UFORC CASE STUDY
Alberta UFO Photograph/Debris Analysis
ALBERTA, CANADA 1967
UFO Photograph #1
(C) 1998 The Regents of the University of Colorado*
The Canadian report also concluded from the photographs that the object had a torus or possibly oblate ellipsoid shape, and that at about 2,000 feet, its diameter would have been 40-50 feet and its thickness 11.5-14 feet. The two photos together indicated ascent or the descent, in accord with testimony.”- Investigator Hartmann (IBID p.472)
“From (the) statistical data supplied, the object has a diameter of 40-50 feet and has a depth of 11.5-14 feet…a review of all technical data…indicated a very acceptable degree of compatibility. If the story and photographs are a hoax, then it is a well prepared one, that would require a hoaxer’s part knowledge of photography and possibly photogrammetry to support the written and verbal information…” - HARTMANN (A quote from his interpretation of their report).
“In my opinion, it is basically this problem that makes the ‘Calgary’ photos of no probative value in establishing the existence of ‘flying saucers:’ the photographs cannot be distinguished from photographs of hand-thrown models.” - HARTMANN (IBID p. 474).
A hand thrown object would not display the same characteristics that indicate the distance between the photographer and the UFO, which the Alberta photos demonstrate. *snip* The effects displayed by the distal source have all of the characteristics of the McMinneville UFO photographs. It is what is commonly referred to as image “scattering” and also “reduction in contrast.” The UFO object is scattering more than just its form. I will take this one step further…I propose that some of the reduction in contrast is due to the time warping field that this UFO is generating. This would account for the lack of sharp definition in most genuine UFO photographs. (IBID, p 402)
A NEW THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Whenever matter is present in time and space, it will create an envelope in that continuum, basically warping, or bending the time/space continuum. The occupants of the UFO merely manipulate the energy field surrounding their vessel to create a door, or opening into this parallel universe, from whence comes the gravity field bleed. They are simply manipulating the natural phenomenon to make it work for them.
Our technology has not advanced to the point where we can create a coherent field, due to the problems that the military is having with the production of a stable G-field wave. I hope that they never perfect this. I will do what I can to prevent this from happening and would ask that anyone reading this do the same. The last time I shared with Uncle Tom, they stole my concept and developed a new class of beam weapon technology. The problem is, they are using it for all the wrong reasons.
Dr. Hynek reported to the Condon project that a Fred Beckmann of the University of Chicago “had studied the original slides.” Using a densitometer, Mr. Beckman “concluded that the image was a ‘real’ photographic image, and that there seemed to be some haze in front of the object (that) suggested considerable range.” (IBID page 475)
Another red herring, Hartmann comments on the previous statement that Mr. Beckman made. Hartmann had this to say:
"In view of the shiny nature of the surface, the clear presence of bright highlights, and the relatively high contrast of distant ground details, it would be difficult, in my judgement, to get a clear indication of enough scattering between the observer and the UFO to indicate a distance of the order of only 2,000 feet.” - HARTMANN (IBID page 475)
THIS CASE REMAINS: UNSOLVED
|
__________________________ REFERENCES:1. “Metal Ejecting UFOs” in CONFRONTATIONS: A CHALLENGE TO SCIENCE, © Jacques Vallee
HOME PAGE !
U.F.O. CASE STUDIES !
U.F.O.R.C. NEWS !
HOT LINKS
UFORCE___2000___CORE
_______________A WHITE KNIGHT PRODUCTION_______________