Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Popular Mechanics, September 1964

Special Report: Cockpit-Testing the Legendary Channel-Wing

by Kevin Brown
(continued)

Three specific configurations, with three specific missions, are now on the horizon. Custer foresees a single-engine version (his first pilotless model was single-engine) for private use or small-scale business use, able to land on farms or remote forest areas where no airports exist.

He also foresees the most exotic configuration of all, a channel jet without any wings or tail section. The engine would be buried in the fuselage, with the scoop in the nose and exhaust in the tail. Channels would then be put in both the nose and the tail, doubling, he says, the lift capacity, because the craft would be, without any external appurtenances, a flying bullet, getting directional control by swiveling the tail channel, the way missiles control direction by swiveling the tail nozzles. The Devore firm, however, sees a "fantastic future" for a four-engine, two-channel passenger plane that could be the long-sought replacement for the venerable DC-3. Carrying 20 passengers, it could drop into and fly out of airports with no more than 300 to 500 feet of runway, making scheduled stops at just about any small town in the world. The engines, they said, are already built--turbines paired to drive one propeller through a gear box. The gears would allow the props to be turned either way, clockwise or counter-clockwise.

Has Orders for Planes

But that's all in the future. Custer claims he already has 40 orders for CCW-5s in its present configuration (at about $75,000 each). Interest runs high among oilmen and foresters who must land in remote areas and patrol long stretches at slow speeds. Whether it's the CCW-5 or some future version, the channel wing--after nearly a lifetime of effort, by one self-educated man--seems at last to be getting off the ground. We asked Custer how he could keep faith in one idea for so long. How did he keep going after each disappointment?

"At first I just got mad," he said, without bitterness. "Then I realized that I was just too far ahead of my time and went back to work."

If he was, or still is, too far ahead of his time, time alone will tell. If he was, then he'll join the long ranks of American pioneers who worked in obscurity and were lionized in death. If he wasn't and his channel wing never really gets off the ground commercially after such a long, lonely agony of devotion, then, to coin a phrase, it will be a flying shame. continue to pictures...


page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | pictures
HomeHome | Inventor | Concept | Story | Today | Site map