Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Wednesday, October 23, 2002 AD

Main Street Plaza

Salt Lake City, Utah

What is the right thing to do with Main Street between South and North Temple Streets? It has been changed. That is indisputable. But there are matters that need to be resolved.

  1. The State of Utah? True.
  2. Salt Lake City? False.
  3. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? False.
The State of Utah owns the Main Street property.

Salt Lake City forfeited any right to property because it was a racketeer influenced corrupt organization and its property was seized by the State of Utah on November 28, 1997 AD, 14 days after Martial Law was declared by the governor of the State of Utah.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with all other churches in Utah, forfeited its property to the State of Utah for engaging in racketeering activities. Church property was seized on November 28, 1997 AD, 14 days after Martial Law was declared by the governor of the State of Utah.

  1. Yes? False.
  2. No? True.
Salt Lake City owned no property at the time of the purported sale. The purported sale was void.
  1. The State of Utah? True.
  2. Salt Lake City? False.
  3. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? False.

The State of Utah owned the Main Street property at the time of the purported sale.

  1. Gold and silver Coin? False.
  2. Irredeemable Federal Reserve Notes or Irredeemable United States Notes? Perhaps, indirectly?
  3. Irredeemable bank credit? True.
No gold or silver coin was offered or accepted, therefore there was no sale. Irredeemable Federal Reserve Notes and irredeemable United States Notes may have been indirectly involved, but they are unconstitutional and void. Fictitious checks, drawn of fictitious accounts, that are not redeemable in gold and silver coin, were used for the purported sale, which was a racketeering activity transaction that was unlawlful and void.

  1. Yes? False.
  2. No? True.
The purported sale was unconstitutional and void.

  1. Yes? False.
  2. No? True.

Jurisdiction over property rights is in the district court of the State of Utah, not in the federal courts. The purported sale was a racketeering activity transaction and is unlawful, unconstitutional and void.

The United States Grand Jury, meeting at 350 South Main Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, twice indicted the Federal Reserve Bank in this district, first (vote: 18 to 0) on February 16, 1982 AD, and second (vote: 16 to 4), on July 7, 1982 AD, for issuing notes not redeemable in gold and silver coin, with intent to defraud, in violation of the constitutional law of the land.

"U.S. Attorney", Brent D. Ward, who was accepting false securities of the United States as compensation for his services, concealed the first true bill of indictment and filed a motion to dismiss the second indictment which was dismissed by "judge" David K. Winder who was also receiving false securities of the United States as compensation for his services. Both were participants in the racketeering activities of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

Because of such racketeering activities there are no courts, district, appeals, or supreme, that have judges who receive undiminished compensation in gold and silver coin, and therefore, there are no courts vested with the judicial power of the United States. U.S. Constitution, Article III.

All of the so called judges or justices thereof are engaged in racketeering activities by using the false securities or other false obligations of the United States, falsely made, issued and circulated with intent to defraud, in violation of 18 USC 371, (conspiracy to defraud the United States), and 471, 472, 473 which are made racketeering activities under 18 USC 1961, and prohibited under 18 USC 1962 and 1963. The lawyers, judges and high priests have laid the foundation for the destruction of this people. The oath breaking law enforcement officers participate in and support organized crime.

    Olene S. Walker is not the secretary of state of the State of Utah, and the office of lieutenant governor is unconstitutional, therefore the UTAH VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET for the November 5, 2002 AD, General Election, certified by Olene S. Walker on August 30, 2002 AD, is not an official publication of the State of Utah, and is false and fraudulent (election fraud).

    No candidates, constitutional amendments, or initiative qualified to be on the general election ballot for November 5, 2002 AD. The judicial retention election "law" is unofficial, unconstitutional and void.

    David E. Yocom and Aaron D. Kennard willfully refused to enforce the Oath of Office law in 1989 and 1991 respectively, and allowed unofficial misconduct to continue in Utah in violation of UCA 76-8-203 (1974), resulting in the dissolution of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of government of the State of Utah and the Utah State Bar, so there are no attorneys authorized to practice law in the State of Utah.

    No new laws have officially been enacted since 1974, nor has the Utah Constitution been officially amended since 1974. Falsifying a public record or account is a felony under UCA 76-8-414.

Sherrie Swensen is not the Salt Lake County Clerk and she, and all other unofficial county clerks likewise, has put out false and fraudulent election information for the November 5, 2002 AD, general election. No candidates or propositions qualified to be on the official ballot. Write-in votes only are official.

The purported members of congress and the employees thereof, and the purported president of the United States and all employees thereof, also are engaged in these racketeering activities, which includes all branches of the armed forces of the United States, which places all nuclear weapons under the control of racketeer influenced corrupt organizations.

  1. Yes? False.
  2. No? True.
The parties named do not have standing, they are all involved in racketeering activities.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a racketeer influenced corrupt organization, and its clients are likewise involved in racketeering activities and are not essential parties to the purported suit. No property changed ownership as a result of the purported sale of the Main Street property, therefore the civil rights questions are moot.

The State of Utah is an essential party but was not named in the purported suit. Michael O. Leavitt is not the governor of the State of Utah, having failed to file his oath of office with the secretary of state, and he leads racketeering activities in the State of Utah.

Ross C. Anderson is not mayor of Salt Lake City. Tyrone Medley, who did not file an oath of office with the secretary of state, falsely administered the oath of office to Ross C. Anderson, January 3, 2000 AD, so Ross C. Anderson has no official standing as a party in the purported case, and he leads racketeering activities in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Lawrence Rey Topham is mayor of Salt Lake City, but was not named in the suit. Remember August 11, 1999 AD, a warning from the Lord!

ss:

THE CONSTITUTION - HOME PAGE
Federalist Papers No. 10.