Comparative Social Inclusion Policies and Citizenship in Europe
Towards a new European Social Model
A TSER thematic Network
Summary of Work Programme
For additional information, see the
SEDEC/CSIP pages at PERC
This project aims to explore and evaluate social inclusion policies in contemporary European
society in comparative perspective through a structured programme of network-based social
inquiry. Apart from the INPART-partners, the following participants contribute to the network:
-
the Interdisciplinary Centre for Comparative Research (ICCR), Vienna, Austria;
-
the University of Middlesex, London, United Kingdom;
-
the University of Bremen, Germany;
-
the Centre for Research and Information on Democracy and Autonomy, Paris, France;
-
the Fondazione Felicita Enrico Bignaschi, Milan, Italy;
-
the Social Research Unit, Helsinki, Finland;
-
the School of Social Work, Lund University, Sweden.
The network is co-ordinated by the University of Sheffield. For further information, please
contact:
Maurice Roche
University of Sheffield
PERC
Elmfield Lodge, Elmfield
Northumberland Road
Sheffield S10 2TY
United Kingdom
E-mail: m.roche@sheffield.ac.uk
1. Objectives
This network project aims to make a contribution to the search for a new European social
model as a frame of reference for developing and evaluating alternative forms of socio-economic policy concerned with social inclusion within the European Union, both at national
and EU level.
Furthermore, the project aims to analyse and evaluate contemporary socio-economic policy
and processes. It will focus on types of policy which emphasise civil society's role in work and
welfare policy. In particular, it will focus on policies concerned with atypical and innovative
forms of work and employment. Its work will proceed by means of cross-national comparative
contextual and policy reviews and also reviews of casestudies. We believe that these studies
will have much to tell us about the key strategic socio-economic policy questions facing the
EU and EU member states.
The project will explore and test the following general hypothesis: Social inclusion policies
which give a positive and constructive role both, on the one hand to flexible forms of work,
and also on the other hand, to principles of social inclusion, citizenship and civil society -other
things being equal (e.g. material resources)- are perceived as being more effective and
succesful by policy-makers, policy-implementers and policy-recipients than tradtional forms of
social policy which marginalise these principles and which marginalise and even penalize these
forms of work.
By addressing, exploring and assessing the hypothesis the project aims to develop an analysis
of the inclusionary potential of a range of European social models and, relatedly, a citizenship-based approach to the evaluation and future development of social inclusion policies within EU
member states and also at the EU level.
2. Objectives
1. To explore and assess the hypothesis the project will address both the national and the EU
level in its work programme and in its four Work Packages (WP's). In WP1 it will begin by
analyzing European social models in terms of their commonalities and their common and
increasing responsiveness to EU economic integration and the creation of a multi-layered EU
socio-economic policy space. It will continue by critically reviewing relevant typologies
relating to the major types of modern social model in European societies. Among other things
it will compare the role of contextual conditions in these social models, particularly the
response of these models to structural changes and transnational conditions and factors such as
globalisation and Europeanisation, and the impact of these factors on national experiences of
exclusion problems and inclusionary needs. It will also compare the role of concepts of work,
civil society and citizenship and the inclusionary potential of these social models. The review of
social models and work/welfare regimes will include consideration of the contemporary
relevance of influential versions such as Esping-Andersens typologies of welfare capitalism and
the subsequent debates and developments of these typologies. Within this review it will
consider current perspectives and debates on the claim that, in addition to the various northern
european social models, a distinctive southern european model exists.
2. Given this background the project will test the hypothesis in more detail (in Work Packages
2 and 3) by exploring and evaluating policy frameworks, policies and practices across the
majority of EU member states which aim to promote social inclusion through new approaches
to work and welfare. Its reviews of policy cases will particularly focus on those emphasising
flexible and innovative forms of work and related forms of welfare, and the development of the
role of civil society in general in work and welfare policy. The various forms of work and
welfare to be considered include parttime employment, work in the informal economy and the
black economy, local work exchange and trading systems, the temporary employment of
migrant labour and local community and family-based welfare and work. The project will focus
on the participation of people in these fields in terms of some of the main categories of social
division and disadvantage, namely class, gender, age and ethnicity. It will consider the situation
of young people and also, to a lesser extent of ethnic minorities in particular. It will consider
the support that such participation provides for people to enter, re-enter or engage more fully
in the formal economy and formal employment, including formal training. It will consider
issues of multicultural integration relevant to this participation. It will consider the general
implications of such participation for people's social inclusion and for the development of
social inclusion policies.
3. The project will culminate in Work Package 4 which will summarize and coordinate the
work of WP's 1, 2 and 3 in relation to a review of the prospects for the future development of
EU-level social inclusion and citizenship policies and related research.
|