Future

WorldWarIII: Why,When,and How of World War III

Click on IntelligenceBriefing above. The Latest Intel is that Ben Ladin has been given Biological and Chemical as well as suitcase Nuclear weopons. The Russians have brokered a deal between the Iranians and Saddam Hussien. Saddam will allow the Iranians to move their armies over his country to attack Isreal with other middle eastern counties. Before the attack from the arabs, the U.S.A. must be brought to its knees. This is where Ben Ladin comes in with terrorist attacks on the U.S. mainland. For sure New York,New York,U.S.A. has been targeted. But do not think that is the only target on the mainland. It is any ones guess who will go to war first the Chinese takeing control of Tiawan or the Arabs against Isreal. The U.S.A. will not be a problem at this time. China is buying Nuclear launch submarines from the Russians.

In the weakness of the USA, the other powers may decide to go to war, not only with us but also in every part of the world that their is any hostility one towards another. This is one possible way: The president of Russia will make a pack with China.(This has already happened in the news; on a financial and political level.March 1999.) Russia will give the USA to the Chinese while Russia will direct most of its conquests to Europe. Russia tells the Chinese to invade Taiwan.(The PRC have warned the U.S. to not place the Tiwanese under our missile defense umbrella.March 1999.) While the US forces go to war to free Taiwan the Russians do a nuclear first strike. (This is not far fethed because the Russian's have been building in the Ural Mountains deep under ground, a very large system of tunnels to save many in the military and civil sectors. They also have a fallout shelter for 90% of the Russian population. The U.S. has a 0% fallout protection for it's people.)The Subs will be off the west and east coasts of America. There will be no warning.

(Some do not want to believe that the Russins will go to war, but I know that they will. READ "Through the Eyes of the Enemy." Author Col. Stanislav Lunev. There have been found the stock piles of Russian caches in Switzerland and other european countries; however the caches in the U.S.A.,in Montana and Michigan and other places have not as yet been found. Also Russia is stockpiling grain, begs for western food, increasing fuel production, stockpiling fuel, continues to build weapons against treaty agreements, expand its deep sea navy, has built the largest nuclear vessel in the world (Peter the Great), as it says it has no money for the rest of the economy. Russia recently entered into an alliance with Communist Red China specifically to undermine the West's dominance as a world power, she refuses to allow any kind of inspections as a condition for western aid, has underground "cities capable of housing over 30,000.March 1999)

Vision by Wilford Woodruff in Salt Lake City, Utah. He writes "... I then found myself wandering about the streets of Salt Lake City and noticed on the doors of every house, including my own, badges of mourning. No one seemed to be passing along the streets and everything was as still as death, except the prayers of the people that could be heard in the houses. I saw no funerals of the scourge or whatever it was, seemed to be under control. I then looked over the country, in every direction as far as I could see, a similer condition prevailed. I then passed eastward above the earth and looking down saw many people coming west, mostly women who were carrying small bundles on their backs. and I thought it strange that there were so few men among them. They were on their way to the mountains and I wondered how they could get there as the railroads were abandoned and the rails were in bad condition. I continued on my way passing through Omaha, Council Bluffs, and Iowa, and saw many women moving about in an excited manner. Sickness and death prevailed on all sides. The inhabitants of Illinois and Missouri were in dreadful condition, the men and women killing each other in the most brutal manner. Next I visited the City of Washington, D.C., and found the place deserted and in ruins. From there I went to Baltimore and on the square, where stands the monument of 1812, dead bodies of the inhabitants of the place were piled in heaps. While there I saw mothers cut the throats of their own children and drink the blood in order to quench their thirst. The waters of the Chesapeake Bay were so befouled from the effect of dead bodies that the water could not be used. Sickness and death previled throughout the city and the stench was something awful. I thought surely that this must be the end of suffering, but when I visited the City of Philadelphia I found the place in ruins and the smell from dead bodies was beyond anything one could imagine. In New York I saw men crawl out of ceilars, ravish beautiful women, kill them and rob them of their jewels. I saw parents eating the flesh of their own offspring and then roll over and die. Looking back while on my way to Central Park I saw fire break out and a heavy wind carried the flames over the city, and all the buildings, wharfs and ships in the harbor were burned. The stench from the burning bodies was carried by the wind across the Hudson River spreading death and destruction wherever it went. The sights that met my view on all sides were so horrible to look upon that it would be impossible for me to describe them. After these scenes had passed I found myself standing on the left bank of the Missouri River, just opposite to where stood the City of Independence and soon discovered that the states of Illinois, Missouri, and part of Iowa had been swept clean of its inhabitants and the surrounding country was a complete wilderness...." He then goes on to describe people traveling to Missouri and building a new city.

My guess is that by 2004 the world will not be the same as it is now. The people of the world will be so frightened after the war that they will be willing to give up all freedoms in exchange for safety. The whole world will accept the plan. For three and a half years there will be the greatest reconstruction ever taken by the human race. Then Martial law is imposed upon all nations. The Mark is required to buy or sell. A small number of people will refuse to take the Mark, and they will not be allowed to buy or sell. Eventually all who refuse will be persecuted, many will be executed.

Here is a interesting prediction from Damian Thompson, auther of The End of Time. One final prediction of Thompson bears quoting in full: "In the next few years, the old world order will disintegrate and a global government will be formed by a leader who, although handsome and charismatec, is the spokesman for forces of evil. His sinister machinations will lead to a Third World War in which half the world's population will perish and a new American or Russian nuclear device called a 'space bus' will plunge into the sea, killing a third of all sea creatures. A Chinese army of 200 million will do battle with the new world government, and dead bodies will be piled as high as mountains." The fact that Thompson is a secular writer makes his predictions all the more eerie, since they come so close to what the Bible tells us what will actually happen during the time of the end.

From "Intelligence Digest" :We have always been deeply pessimistic about the prospects for peace in the Middle East, but this pessimism has at least been tempered in recent years by our belief that the Arab/Iranian war party would not or could not exercise its war option until the early years of the new century - and during the time remaining, it was still possible that Amerecan diplomacy could succeed in establishing a stable balance of power in the region capable of maintaining the peace (or, at least, the absence of war) indefinitely. However, intelligence received in thes office during the past few weeks points to a greatly reduced time-frame. There is now evidence to support the view that the Middle East's moment of truth could come as early as the second half of 1998-and the reason for this is as dramatic as the news itself. "Few would disagree that the danger of a new Arab-Israili war has been brought considerably closer by recent Russian actions." There is every possibility that Moscow, for whatever reasons of its own, has made a decision to precipitate an Arab-Israili war within that time-frame. The evidence for this conclusion is laid out in full in the first of this week's "Briefings". None of the evidence is conclusive (it would be strange if it were), and even if our assessment is correct, the point of no return has not been passed. However, few would disagree on seeing the evidence that the danger of a new Arab-Israeli war has been brought consideraby closer by recent Russian actions. The next 18 months in the Middle East will be fraught with danger, and it will take statecraft of the highest possible order on the part of the USA if a catastrophic war in the Middle East involving chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons is to be avoided. There are four main reasons why we have previously argued that the next Arab-Israeli war is unlikely to occur before 2000. The first of these is that there is no logic in going to war before every possible concession has been wrung out of the enemy by peaceful means - and for all their public opposition to the peace process, those in the Arab/Iranian war party have always understood that negotiation a return of the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and possibly even the Golan Heights made much more sense than fighting for them. So, we have argued, war was never likely to come before the end of the peace process, sometime after the year 2000. Now, however, the felling in the war camp is that most of the major concessions have been gained. No one believes any longer that the Israeli army will come down off the West Bank watershed, abondon the Jordan valley, or retreat from the Golan Heights - all or any of which would be worth waiting for. Israel's previous Labour government might have been moving in this direction, but it lost the election last year by a 10% margin of the Jewish vote, and opinions have hardened still further as a result of the recent suicide bombings. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might be unpopular, but there is no Jewish mandate for further territorial retreat. Although the gains achieved by the Arabs at the negotiating table are worth having (there are 40,000 armed Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza), little more can now be gained - and much could be lost if pressure on Palestinian Authority leader Yasser Arafat to crack down on the Islamist terrorists of Hamas and Islamic Jihad were to lead to a Palestinian civil war. The second brake on an immediate Arab-Israeli war has been the need for the Arab states and Iran to neutralize Israel's nuclear deterrent. There are increasing indications that this has, in effect, been done even without the acquisition of a major nuclear capability by any of the Arab states or Iran. Recent intelligence has shown that Syria has far more Scud C missiles (armed with advanced-type chemical warheads) than previously thought. Most important, the latest intelligence shows that Syria has an unusually high proportion of launchers to missiles (2-to-1 instead of the usual 10-to-1). This will enable Syria to launch a barrage of missiles at Israel in one go. With such a capability, Syria might legitimately think that Israel would not dare use its nuclear arsenal. Third, since Israel sighed a military pact with Turkey in early 1996, we have argued that Syria cannot possibly go to war with Israel until Turkey is neutralized. there are only two ways this can be achieved, and both are being tried. The first is to change the nature of Turkey's government. Ankarn does face an increasing threat from the fundamentalist trend, so much so, in fact, that our latest information is that the Turkish army has been making preparations for an Algerian-style Islamis Uprising. The second way of neutralizing Turkey is through Russia, and it is this prospect that is most worrysome. There is now a destinct possibility (openly aired by Turkey's former prime minister Tansu Ciller) that Turkey could find itself at war with Russia over the supply of Russian S-300 missiles to cyprus by the end of 1998. Turkey has said delivery of the missiles would be a cause for war with Cyprus; Russia has said it intends to deliver by the end of 1998, and now respected former Turkish prime minister Tansu Ciller, who was also foreign minister in the last government, has warned that unless there is a change in policy "Turkey is going to war with Russia." But why would Russia want to provoke a war with NATO member Turkey? It is possible (we will put it no higher than that for now) that Russia has made a strategic decision to make a last-gasp bid to regain its former superpower status by providing the Islamic world with the means to defeat Israel and reconquer Jerusalem. What is the evidence for this? We know already that Russia is actively arming both Syria and Iran. We know that it is intentionally heading for a confrontation with Turkey over the seemingly small issue (for Russia) of supplying air-defense missiles to Cyprus. And there is something else: The final reason why we have previously assumed that the fimal Middle-Est show down is still some years away is because of America's support for Israil and the still-fresh lessons of Saddam Hussein's ill-fated adventure into Kuwait. We have long argued that the best way to neutralize America would be by using nuclear-armed terrorests to blackmail the U.S. into inaction, but we have also assumed that id is unlikely that any of the Iranian-controlled terrorists groups yet has that capacity. Until now, that is. Whether or not any of these suitcase nuclear bombs have actually gone missing is now almost irrelevant. After Lebed's statment, what American president is going to call the bluff of a terrorist group that says it has one (or more) of these bombs (described by Lebed as "ideal for nuclear terror") which it is going to explode in an American city (or cities) in the event the U.S. moves to protect Israel against an Arab/Iranian assault? Launching its own first strike. With Turkey possibly geading for war with Russia, with Iran and Syria arming themselves with deadly unconventional weapons and the means to deliver them, and with the Palestinians moving toware an armed intifada in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the temptation to strike first will become intense, as has been openly hinted at by Prime Minister Netanyahu. At Netenyahu's 11 September meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, he pointed out that Iran would have acquired enough ballistic-missile technology "within a year to 18 months" so as not to require outside assistance. And because of this, bothin the meeting in private, and outside the meeting in public, Netanyahu warned: "There must be an appropriate response in the time that remains." In other words, both Israel and Iran, and Turkey and Russia, are on an 18-month countdown to war. 1998 is beginning to look like a year to fear." Joseph de Courcy, Intelligence Digest, 19 September, 1997.

A nuclear event on U.S. soil would drastically change our way of life. Certainly the Stock Market, which is now the preferred "savings" vehicle for millions, would crash. A war would at the very least would certainly cut off oil to this country and cause economic turmoil. It is also possible that this opportunity will be seized by the One-World elitists to advance their cause. A nuclear event on our soil would cause the President to declare Marshal law, suspend the constitution.