A. FEDERALIZATION OF LOCAL, COUNTY, AND STATE POLICE
1. CITIZENS shall vote on the federalization of local police and all local enforcement
a. any citizen who has ever been offended by local authorities unjustly votes YES
i. this includes criminal elements who may not have been felony convictions
ii. this shall not exclude any citizen and there shall be a truly democratic vote
iii. there shall be no characterization made against the lobby to have this done
iv. scare-tactics and false claims about State's rights shall be disallowed as false
2. THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS THE TOTAL FEDERALIZATION OF LOCAL
AUTHORITIES
3. THE SECONDARY GOAL SHALL BE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FEDERAL "INTERNAL-AFFAIRS"
ESTABLISHED TO PROVIDE DECISIVE AND WHOLE AND AUTONOMOUS OVERSIGHT AND REVIEW
OF ANY AND ALL COMPLAINTS AGAINST OFFICERS BY IMPARTIAL PARTIES AS PROVEN IMPARTIAL
a. This secondary goal shall be considered PRIMARY GOAL if point (2), above, cannot
be ratified
b. Multiple channels of "witness protected" anonymous contact shall be established
including email addresses provided for the reporting of police abuses OF ANY KIND
IN PARTICULAR REPORTS OF POLICE MENACING CITIZENS or otherwise abusing their
power
without ensuing prosecution or other similar violations shall be reviewed by an
autonomous independent federal body
i. the email and other contact points shall welcome video-tape and audio evidence
in any amount and of any kind which assists this federal group in assessing
the veracity of claims made against officers
ii. all claims against officers IN PARTICULAR those which are in situations where
the claimant is not being prosecuted SHALL BE VIEWED SPECIFICALLY AS TRUE
UNTIL
PROVEN FALSE, or, at the very least, shall be reviewed seriously and
without the pretense that the police officer(s) are innocent
c. Any evidence of police corruption or menacing or abuse or stalking of citizens
regardless of whether prosecution occurs shall be made public on the world-wide
internet AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CLAIMANT, TO INCLUDE IDENTIFICATION OF THE
OFFICER AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
B. ESTABLISHMENT OF A CIVILIAN CONTROLLED AND PRIVACY-GUARANTEED SURVEILLANCE NETWORK
a. DISTRIBUTED WIDE-AREA VIDEO AND AUDIO FEEDS (i.e. webcams with infrared night vision)
SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE MONITORING OF SERIOUS VIOLENT
CRIMES AND IN PARTICULAR
MENACING, HARASSING, VIOLATING, OR OTHERWISE IMPROPER ACTIVITY OF POLICE ET AL
b. A PANEL OF GUARANTEED INDEPENDENT CITIZENS SHALL PARTICIPATE IN A "KEY-RING-CRYPTOGRAPHY
" SUCH THAT THE PANEL MUST VOTE UNANIMOUSLY TO "UNLOCK" THE PRIVACY-ENSURED ENCRYPTED
VIDEO AND AUDIO FEED FROM THE SURVEILLANCE PERTAINING TO ANY COMPLAINT REFERRING
TO POLICE ABUSE OR ALTERNATIVELY ONLY TO SUCH COMPLAINTS OR INVESTIGATIONS AS MERIT
THE UNLOCKING, SPECIFICALLY SERIOUS VIOLENT CRIMES PERFORMED BY CITIZENS.
i. in other words, any police abuse including police menacing IN ANY CASE, shall
be
available for a vote to unlock the privacy-ensured data
ii. AND, in other words, NO CASE of any crime other than one of a serious violent
nature may be IN ANY CASE unlocked even by the panel of citizens, as a rule,
in order to further ensure privacy
iii. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES shall the unlocking of video or audio data lead to ANY
prosecution OR ANY OTHER ACTION related to ANY OTHER than those PARTICULAR AND
SPECIFIC acts which enabled the unlocking of this private audio or video
c. CRYPTOGRAPHIC PROTECTION "LOCKING" THE VIDEO AND AUDIO SHALL BE MILITARY-GRADE FOR
THE
ENSURING OF THE PRIVACY OF ALL CITIZENS AND TO ENSURE THAT ONLY THE GUARANTEED
INDEPENDENT PANEL OF CITIZENS MAY EVER BE CAPABLE OF UNLOCKING THE VIDEO OR/AND AUDIO
i. multiple layers of various cryptographic privacy ensuring shall be employed
IN PARTICULAR including cryptographic methods ON THE CAMERA HARDWARE to ensure
the centralization and storage of the data cannot be intercepted and decoded
during transmission by MALICIOUS AUTHORITIES seeking (who surely shall seek) to
ATTACK the framework for surveillance which citizens control
ii. THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY shall certify the protective grade of the cryptography
to exceed that required to protect the citizen controlled surveillance network
from an "FBI-grade" attack on that privacy data (which surely would come)
iii. THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY shall respond to attempts to breach the civilian
controlled surveillance network, as a matter of securing THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the protection of "her" citizens as they use this
PURELY DEFENSIVE means of data collection toward that very same purpose
C. THE MEMBERS OF THE PANEL OF CITIZENS CONTROLLING BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE THE UNLOCKING OF SECURED
PRIVACY INFORMATION VIDEO AND/OR AUDIO ACQUIRED BY THE CITIZEN CONTROLLED SURVEILLANCE
NETWORK SHALL BE TO WHATEVER DEGREE NECESSARY PROTECTED FROM INFLUENCE OF ANY KIND
ON THE PART OF ANY BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT WHETHER FEDERAL OR LOCAL OR FOREIGN BY
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY AS A MILITARY CONCERN EVEN IF THE THREAT TO THE
CITIZEN PANEL IS FROM ONLY A LOCAL AUTHORITY
i. THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY in-as-much-as legislation has exempted "CIA" from
posse comitatus AND AS IT SHALL BE RELIEVED of such IN THIS MATTER, has an
established set of "attack arms" capable of destroying any personal or mechanical
asset in any branch of government throughout the world, and is therefore the only
appropriate agency for this mission in the defense of the citizens of the United
States of America
ii. The "CIA" is also the only agency in the national security circuit capable of
ubiquitously breeching any level of privacy safeguards totally and easily, and
also the only one authorized or suspected to do so, and as such, has the responsibilty
to be the ultimate "gatekeeper and key holder"
of the entire nation AND is also
an agency generally trusted to review itself even apart from congress (their power
is such that not trusting them is totally impossible)
iii. A separate avenue of registering events considered to be attempts at compromising
or otherwise manipulating or destroying the civilian panel shall be established
to allow the civilian panel in control of this privacy information (by vote of course)
to be assured that their integrity as well as their person shall be protected
from any adversity caused by their participation
REGARDLESS OF THE SOURCE
OF THE ATTEMPT TO COMPROMISE IT.