Posts By: John Stracke
Date | Post | Topic |
06/28/2010 | Why is it that chemistry, | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
04/19/2010 | Other twists | More iPhone PL lockdown... Goodbye Scratch! |
04/20/2010 | I'm not saying it's the wrong decision | More iPhone PL lockdown... Goodbye Scratch! |
04/09/2010 | Long-term implications | iPhone PL lockdown |
04/09/2010 | Don't count on it | iPhone PL lockdown |
03/10/2010 | Yes, but | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
12/01/2009 | Early GCC: I can vouch for that | Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software |
12/01/2009 | Regrets | Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software |
10/30/2009 | Difference in emphasis | Liskov's list of papers |
10/30/2009 | Links | Liskov's list of papers |
10/15/2009 | Buggy GC | Safe Garbage Collection = Regions + Intensional Type Analysis |
10/09/2009 | Broken link | Haskell in the real world: writing a commercial program in Haskell |
10/07/2009 | Filet-o-Fish | Compilation to C, a definitive guide? |
10/15/2009 | Not a good sign | Create Your Own Programming Language (book) |
08/13/2009 | Fear | Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof |
08/13/2009 | Well, sure | Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof |
08/13/2009 | Lisp, too | Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof |
07/28/2009 | So does '|COMMON LISP| | Resolved Debates in Syntax Design ? |
07/23/2009 | Not necessarily a stack | Apollo 11 Source Code on GoogleCode |
06/04/2009 | Next 700 | Peter Landin |
05/11/2009 | Wrong | Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? |
04/14/2009 | Meta time | Scala Lift Off 2009 |
04/09/2009 | It varies a lot | Jonathon Shapiro Wraps Up BitC |
03/31/2009 | Might other languages borrow this? | PLOT: Programming Language for Old Timers |
04/01/2009 | Not Objective-C | PLOT: Programming Language for Old Timers |
03/27/2009 | Confluence? | The Art of the Propagator |
03/30/2009 | Got it, thanks. | The Art of the Propagator |
01/13/2009 | Really? | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/13/2009 | Fixnum vs. bignum | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
10/23/2008 | But that's the point | BEE3: Putting the Buzz Back into Computer Architecture |
10/23/2008 | ...but it might not be that cheap | BEE3: Putting the Buzz Back into Computer Architecture |
10/23/2008 | Erlang? | BEE3: Putting the Buzz Back into Computer Architecture |
10/23/2008 | Yes, very much like RAMP | BEE3: Putting the Buzz Back into Computer Architecture |
10/22/2008 | A different sort of challenge | Adequate bootstrap for compiler with defmacro? |
09/15/2008 | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/15/2008 | Not the Haskells I've seen | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/16/2008 | Hmm | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/16/2008 | Debugging | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/17/2008 | Still doesn't work | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/17/2008 | (a) I don't have any mutable | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/17/2008 | Good point | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/16/2008 | Interesting, but... | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/17/2008 | Interesting, but not a solution for me | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/18/2008 | You're right | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/19/2008 | Ooh | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/19/2008 | Tricky | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/03/2008 | Quite slow, actually | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/03/2008 | Boehm GC | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/06/2008 | Good ideas | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/06/2008 | Lisp multiple values make it easier | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
09/23/2008 | Nice! | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
08/05/2008 | 1963 specification | JOVIAL: Stand up Schwartz |
11/20/2007 | Lots of them | Samurai - Protecting Critical Data in Unsafe Languages |
11/21/2007 | Netscape/Mozilla | Samurai - Protecting Critical Data in Unsafe Languages |
11/07/2007 | The halting problem for types | Universal Type System |
10/24/2007 | Anthropologist | Different results in the unit root test. Why? |
10/11/2007 | Yes, but | Examples of large-scale functional language projects |
10/09/2007 | Rangoon | Leave of absence |
09/27/2007 | It does have WiFi | OLPC to sell to public |
09/26/2007 | Not necessarily | Tim Bray and Erlang |
09/28/2007 | Why copy? | Tim Bray and Erlang |
09/06/2007 | Not what he meant | Q: Modularizing SQL? |
09/06/2007 | You may be right | Q: Modularizing SQL? |
07/27/2007 | Where is it? | Seam from PLT perspective |
07/02/2007 | Interesting, but not convincing | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/03/2007 | Stacks and type inference | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/03/2007 | Stacks and type inference: Citations | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/03/2007 | Yes, but | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/06/2007 | That turns out not to be the case | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/06/2007 | Never necessary | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/03/2007 | Stoddart & Knaggs: just a beginning | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/03/2007 | Cat: well, not quite | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/06/2007 | Sorry about that | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/06/2007 | Economic choices | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
07/06/2007 | Yes and no | Forth in hardware ("not dead yet") |
06/22/2007 | What's to discuss? | Standing on each others' feet |
06/26/2007 | Pass-by-name is not Python | Katahdin: Modifying your programming language as it runs |
06/27/2007 | Didn't know that | Katahdin: Modifying your programming language as it runs |
06/13/2007 | Oh, good! | User names |
06/27/2007 | Stateless both sides | Trickles: A Stateless Network Stack for Improved Scalability, Resilience and Flexibility |
11/17/2006 | Abelson | De-Scheming MIT? |
02/02/2006 | C++ refs: You'd think so, wouldn't you? | The Next Mainstream Programming Languages |
01/06/2006 | Conflates clients | The new old or The "Return" to Concurrency |
10/17/2005 | Certainly possible | Object Oriented Programming + Referential Transparency |
05/05/2005 | Too many cooks | Let's make a programming language! |
01/20/2005 | Amateurs, indeed | OOP Is Much Better in Theory Than in Practice |
01/21/2005 | Lists and tuples | OOP Is Much Better in Theory Than in Practice |
01/21/2005 | Hobbyist magazines | OOP Is Much Better in Theory Than in Practice |
10/06/2004 | Or lack of message? | Shoot-out: most annoying compiler error message |
09/03/2004 | Encapsulation with closures | Higher order versus Object order |
LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |