Posts By: Brendan Eich
Date | Post | Topic |
10/10/2011 | Dart won't be standardized without multiple vendors | Google's Dart announced |
09/21/2011 | What design-by-committee languages? | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/21/2011 | Clue: Mark M. not working on Dart | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/21/2011 | Second reply (first was orphaned to top level) | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/22/2011 | Try working with competitors in a standards group | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/22/2011 | learned nothing and forgotten everything... | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/22/2011 | Quibbling while the Web standards burn | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/22/2011 | This feels like feeding a troll | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | This will be brief | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | Standard is as standard does | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | API != normative semantics | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | standards are for interoperating peers | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/26/2011 | Huzzah | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/21/2011 | Priorities, not ideas | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/22/2011 | This thread is only about "process", or leaked politics | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | My best rumor-informed guess | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | Sure, ES4 never claimed precedent | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
09/23/2011 | Calling Tool-time Tim | Google's "The Future of JavaScript" internal memo leaked |
07/20/2011 | I did not "choose" the name or the syntax | Knockout JS |
07/20/2011 | <script> supports multiple MIME types | Knockout JS |
07/21/2011 | Dream on | Knockout JS |
07/21/2011 | static assumptions fail on the web | Knockout JS |
07/21/2011 | JS was not for non-programmers only | Knockout JS |
07/27/2011 | I chose prototypal because | Knockout JS |
07/21/2011 | Good point about lack of a standard VM being a plus | Knockout JS |
09/25/2010 | "like types" precedent | Thorn |
07/09/2010 | Oh, you! | The Rust Language |
07/08/2010 | We care. | The Rust Language |
07/09/2010 | Standard library coming, with typestate FTW | The Rust Language |
07/09/2010 | You write "older approach" as if it's a bad thing | The Rust Language |
07/09/2010 | You ask an honest question | The Rust Language |
07/21/2010 | Hi Jon, long time since SGI. | The Rust Language |
07/09/2010 | Type system enforces immutability, no MMU needed | The Rust Language |
07/13/2010 | To say a bit more | The Rust Language |
07/21/2010 | An "auto" domain might suffice | The Rust Language |
03/10/2010 | Long Chess Game | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | We're too old to be desperate | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | Code is code | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | How to be a millionaire | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | Host objects are from the Devil | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | Not "what Brand X does" | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | Off topic, but web developers target users, not themselves | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/11/2010 | Lua is king of game engine embedded languages | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/11/2010 | Best doesn't matter (WiB) | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/10/2010 | Trading speculations | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/11/2010 | Don't assume equilibrium | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/11/2010 | DOMs, membranes, CFI, oh my | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/11/2010 | Mozilla's wrappers | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
03/12/2010 | Doing it for real requires static whole-function-tree analysis | Have tracing JIT compilers won? |
08/16/2008 | Big niche an oxymoron? | JavaScript harmony |
08/16/2008 | Not the droid we're looking for | JavaScript harmony |
08/16/2008 | ES3.1 has new semantics | JavaScript harmony |
08/16/2008 | Links will be fixed | JavaScript harmony |
08/16/2008 | Links fixed | JavaScript harmony |
10/23/2007 | Monkeys will save us | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/23/2007 | JS as IL | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/23/2007 | Indeed | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/23/2007 | Fixed | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/24/2007 | Optionality | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/25/2007 | Size matters | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/26/2007 | Sugar, protein, bones | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/29/2007 | APIs -- and code to call them | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/31/2007 | DOM hides JS costs | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
11/06/2007 | Fix bugs only? | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
11/07/2007 | Untyped code, typed APIs and toolkits | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/26/2007 | Yay, evolution | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/29/2007 | XHTML utopia | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/28/2007 | Pay attention, please | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/29/2007 | Meta-programming in ES4 | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
10/29/2007 | Sorry! | ECMAScript 4 overview paper |
02/14/2007 | Defining Threads | Threads in JavaScript? |
LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |