Within most religious and spiritual doctrines, there is another hidden message which is beyond belief, process, path and the teaching of personal endeavor. It is a revelation out of which can arise a radically different perception of reality. By exploring the essence of various traditional and contemporary practices and attempts to expose the myths that surround the mystery to which they aspire. It can suddenly and apparently happen, that a very deeply subtle "awakening" can occur to the individual whom had once been convinced that their "I"/"me" required a seeker to seek, that which cannot be sought. Liberation of a separation of Self happens when the death of the "I"/"me" happens by exposing itself, from a story of the "I"/"me" that was just another conditioned response, also inferred and self-perpetuated by other individuals, personified by their contracted sense of self-inflicted neurosis. It also reveals the way in which seeking for fulfillment can only reinforce the sense of continuously reaching out for something that has never been lost. The dynamic of this communication is essentially energetic, and this can nullify the mind's needs for ideas and answers and dissipate the contracted sense of Self and a reluctance to experience unconditional freedom, triggered by a fear-based reaction or response to any attempts of Self-inquiry.

This message is not new . . . and yet, it is also very rarely spoken, heard, or understood. Its fundamental essence and content is to be found in the apparent history of seeking originating in Advaita Vedanta, Non-dualism, a particular Zen Buddhism and Christian mysticism. These subjects are explored in more liberally-minded schools and are certainly part of the University curriculum. This message also embraces recent discoveries of quantum physics, neuro-science and biology.

Richard Ty Trevino's story began, upon given a birth name and a birth rite. Then the indoctrination of conditions as a 'me' began as a story, and the character as a 'me' with a birth name and a birth rite, began to carry-on by developing all the seemingly apparent appearances of characteristics that are associated with an individual person, as though, in that separateness there was a one-of-a-kind originally individualized person that was separate from What Is and What Is Not Empty Fullness, appearing as All That Is and All That Is Not Empty Fullness. These are one of several ways that the separation of self seemingly happens. Individuality is then expressed by a 'me' as their story develops. The individualized 'me' then branches off into 2 other parts. Those parts are the seeker and the witness. The seeker spends all of the me's time that the me's embodiment will expend to exist temporally temporary, according to the qualitative attributes of the me's consciousness and/or mental capacity, to either seemingly appear to be remaining trapped within an embodiment that is bound to embodiment, for a finite number of days, months, and years, within parameters of linear time, or simply to seemingly become involved in an entirely different type of reality frame, that is apparently appearing as though altogether differently configured, compared to a physical matter reality frame that supports embodiments/avatars/action figures/units of local qualia consciousness energy forms. A historical(his-story)/herstorical(her-story) database, that is accessible by a 'me', that did not fall away/collapse or die, can seemingly appear to return to this or some other type that, as an appearance of physical matter. That can then seemingly begin to restart an entirely new story (reincarnation) until the sense of separation as a 'me' has fallen away/dissipated/died while it has the apparent appearance of embodiment intact or when there is no longer cognizance of self-realization, as a partially liberated self-realized being. The ability of a 'me' to apprehend memories, is how the 'me' accesses its own his-storical story or her-storical story database to see if there is something else that the 'me' can do and know about justifying its very existence. That is not necessary to replace being with knowing and doing. When you are being, without focusing on knowing and doing, as the innocence of a child, this is the original state of being-ness, prior to the mental thought system claiming that you are a separate non-existent individual entity, that is separated from 'What Is and What Is Not Empty Fullness,' when that was never the case all along.

The seeker will embark on missions to make every effort of reporting back to the 'me', with information regarding how and why the 'me' separated from self in the first place. The seeker always gathers and collects information for the 'me', so that the 'me' can say he/she has gained a degree of knowledge, regarding 'What Is and What Is Not Empty Fullness' that is unknowable by any-body for that to be so. If the 'me' seemingly happens to fall away/collapse/dissipate whilst still apparently appearing as various animations of embodiments, this can then lead the 'me' to a sudden or subtle and every degree in between, as a sort of appearance as a death/transitional-recognition that their 'me' was an illusory construct as a dream about the story of:[insert your birth-name here]. Self embodiment within 'What Is and Is Not Empty Fullness,' is also part of this reality frame, as a type of collective consciousness, that is Absolute liberation with or without the apparent appearances of embodiment. Eventually,[insert your birth-name here] will recognize and/or self-realize that their 'me' has collapsed/fallen-away/died, and now there is self-recognition that there is partial liberation happening, as an appearance of what is seemingly appearing real to 'What Is and What Is Not Empty Fullness,' as[insert your birth-name here] doing something. Everything and no-thing is dreaming that it is:[insert your birth-name here] doing something. What [insert your birth-name here] thinks they do next, is simply being done. [insert your birth-name here] is the dreamings used to give all the meaning that reality will ever reveal to an action figure that is simply engaged as being that at all times, as a natural state of being-ness. In the "Isness" there is aliveness. 'What Is and What Is Not Empty Fullness' is appearing and happening for nobody, for no apparent reason, and for no apparent purpose, as All That Is and All That Is Not Empty Fullness. It is simply what is appearing to be happening, as an apparent appearance of what is always happening. Self-inquiry can provide a witness with connectivity to the collective consciousness that is self, after partial liberation, since self cannot get out of self. There is partial liberation in embodiment. Absolute liberation happens, once there is no longer an embodiment appearing as an embodiment, that had been presumably supporting and enacting upon partial liberation for that to apparently appear as happen-ings. Absolute liberation happens whilst the witness remains in partial liberation, until the witness collapses and there is no longer the apparent appearance of embodiment."

***THE AWAKENING PROCESS***

"Once a salt doll went to measure the depth of the ocean. It wanted to tell others how deep the water was. But this it could never do, for no sooner did it get into the water than it dissolved. Now, who was there to report the ocean's depth? What Brahman is cannot be described. In samadhi one attains the knowledge of Brahman -- one realizes Brahman. In that state reasoning stops altogether, and man becomes mute. He has no power to describe the nature of Brahman."

Empty Fullness Productions© 1999-Infinitudinal Complexification All rights reserved ***

Search Engine Submission - AddMe