Dream of: 25 September 1997 "Identifying Dream People"
I was talking with a thin bespeckled woman (probably in her late 30s) about how I wrote my dreams. I was explaining the way I sometimes identified people in dreams. I explained that sometimes when I wrote my dreams, I would identify the person in my writing, even though I hadn't been sure who the person was when I had been dreaming.
I wanted to give the woman an example, suggesting a scenario in which I saw her, the woman, in a dream. But I couldn't remember the woman's name, and I didn't want to admit to her that I had forgotten her name.
So instead I just made up an example using a "Mr. X." I said that if I dreamed I saw someone in a room, while I was dreaming I might not actually know who the person was. But when I awoke I would realize the person had actually been Mr. X. Now when I wrote the dream, I could use one of two methods. First, I could write that I saw Mr. X in the room. Or, second, I could write that I saw a person who resembled Mr. X, but who I wasn't sure was Mr. X, in the room.
What I wanted to point out was that the second formula was so much more cumbersome, it was better to use the first formula. But at the same time I realized that I had long ago dealt with this problem and that I didn't use either of the two formulas which I had given. The formula that I had already decided to use was to simply say that I had seen a person who resembled Mr. X. This was a truthful formula, which wasn't cumbersome. The only detail that my formula failed to state was whether I had realized in the dream that the person resembled Mr. X, or whether I had realized upon waking that the person resembled Mr. X.
Nevertheless, I didn't mention the formula which I actually used to the women. Instead I continued to argue for the first formula which I had mentioned, the formula which simply said I had seen Mr. X in the room (not the formula which said I had seen a man who resembled Mr. X in the room). I also didn't admit to the woman what I realized was true: that the first way wasn't completely accurate. Instead, my argument was that there was some reason why I had picked Mr. X above all other people in the world, and that reason was sufficient to justify saying it was Mr. X whom I had seen in the room. I said this was "logical." And indeed, my argument did appear logical. Yet at the same time, I could sense a certain flaw in my argument, a flaw which I couldn't exactly pinpoint. I had to admit that even though logical, to say I saw Mr. X in the room, didn't seem completely truthful.
The woman said, "I don't think so."
I didn't like this woman. She was being too picky and too uncompromising. She didn't seem to understand some of the difficulties encountered in making dreams readable.
Dream Epics Home Page
Copyright 2009 by email@example.com