Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Web Project Evaluation

Both of the group projects will be graded three ways--

Team members grade each other on participation (20% of project grade)—
How well did each team member perform his/her assigned roles?
How reliable was each team member in fulfilling his/her assigned tasks?

Teams grade other team sites (20% of project grade)—
Each team will evaluate three other web sites for--
Appearance (design, esthetics, inclusion of images for Project 2, etc.)
Organization (helpful, clear purpose, easy to navigate, etc.)
Content (well researched, well written, etc.)
Useful links (links work, are relevant, and add to value of site)
Bibliography (helpful, comprehensive)

TAs grade each site for (60% of project grade)—
Appearance (design, esthetics, inclusion of images for Project 2, etc.)
Organization (helpful, clear purpose, easy to navigate, etc.)
Content (well researched, well written, etc.)
Useful links (links work, are relevant, and add to value of site)
Bibliography (helpful, comprehensive)


Team Member Evaluation Sheet

Name:
SSN:

Please give your team member an evaluation of his/her performance using the following numbers--
1-Very Unsatisfactory
2-Unsatisfactory
3-Satisfactory
4-Good
5-Excellent

How well did this person perform his/her assigned roles in the group?_______
How well did this person perform his/her assigned tasks in the group?________
How reliable was this person in working with the rest of the team?________
How would you rate the overall quality of this person's work?________

Comments:





Team Evaluation Sheet

Please evaluate http://www._____________________ according to the following criteria--
1-Very Unsatisfactory
2-Unsatisfactory
3-Satisfactory
4-Good
5-Excellent

Appearance. On a scale of 1-5
How attractive is the site?______
How many images are on the site?__________
How relevant were the images to the topic addressed on the site?__________


Organization. On a scale of 1-5
How well organized was the site?_________
How easy was this site to navigate?__________
How clear was the presentation of this site's topic?___________

Content. On a scale of 1-5
How well researched was the site?___________
How well written was the text?_________
How well did the site cover its intended topic?___________
As GRG 305 students, how much did this site add to your understanding of the topic?___________

Links. On a scale of 1-10
Did all of the links work?____________
Was the number of links appropriate for the site?_________
How much did the links add to the value of the site?________

References. On a scale of 1-10
Are the references current and up to date?__________
How comprehensive were the references?_________
If you were given a question about this topic on the final exam, would the references help you prepare an essay about this topic?_________

 

Comments: