The Official Site of The Great Brandoni

Home   |    My News   |    Me   |    Friends   |    Family   |    Calendar   |    Message Board   |    Band   |   Writings   |    Art
 ~ NEWS
  Special Reports
  Goings On
  Family
  Friends
  Opinion
  Entertainment
  Speak Out
  Weather
 ~ INFO. ON ME
  Likes - Dislikes
  Statistics
  Family
  Friends
  Writings
  Art
  Band
  Blog
Written on July 2, 2003
28 Days Later - movie, 4 stars
Curiosity got the best of me, and I had to see "28 Days Later" opening weekend. I have enjoyed all of Danny Boyle's films, from the nail-biter Shallow Grave to the comedies Trainspotting and A Life Less Ordinary. Boyle used actor Ewan McGregor in his first three films and they rose to fame together. Then he came out with the big budget film "The Beach" with Leonardo DiCaprio which essentially flopped (although I quite enjoyed it myself). Now he's back to a low budget film with a bunch of nobodies filmed with a digital camera. What this means is that people who are expecting a big budget scare-fest with a lot of glamorized action and violence are in for a big surprise.

The movie opens with scenes of ultra-violence flashing before the eyes of chimpanzees (a la "Clockwork Orange"). A group of activists enter and release a few of the primates only to be attacked by them releasing the deadly virus "rage".  28 days later England is a only a ghost of itself. Most of it's living inhabitants are vomiting, savage killers. Jim who has been in a coma finds all of this out the hard way. He wakes to find a barren city with picture memorials eerily close to those after 9/11 then is confronted by some of the infected. When he meets other survivors they must figure out what's truly important, if merely living is enough.

The cinematography actually is quite beautiful at parts and the actors are believable. You may even recognize a couple of the actors: Brendan Gleeson had memorable roles in "Braveheart" and "Gangs of New York" and "Christopher Eccleston" was in Boyle's first film "Shallow Grave" and was the "bad guy" in "Gone in 60 Seconds". I was also pleasantly surprised at how subtle the movie was. It also raised some interesting questions about man's capacity for inhumanity and it's impulse towards aggression. I think if you were a fan of "Signs" you should also enjoy "28 Days Later". Although "Signs" was a better film, they both had genuinely scary moments, raised philosophical questions and were subtle in their approach.

Warning: If for some reason you haven't seen a trailer for this movie, don't! I hate it when trailers contain a scene from a later part of the movie. Also... I have no idea why people take children to rated R movies like this. Don't! I hate hearing kids voices during these movies. Besides Jim waking up naked from his coma (full frontal nudity) 28 Days Later definitely has it's share of violence.

 


Goings On | Family | Friends | Opinion | Entertainment |Special Reports

© 2003 , Brandon Christison