The two Nation Theory
The two Nation theory was and is a reality, it doesn't matter either indian or other believe it or not. The thing that matter is the people who supported the idea of two separated land are still behind it and fervently trying to consolidate their motherland's position in the world and by the grace of God the Pakistan today is the 6th strongest atomic and military power in the world, its economy is getting better and day by day Pakistan slowly but steadily running on the road of democracy.
Jinnah was a very shroud, intelligent, man of word and principles and most upright person of all his adversaries. His whole life is an evidence of non-violent methods to achieve his goals first as an ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity and later a liberator of a nation which was about to fall into the trap of one nation ideology. When he realized that congress covertly was trying to exploit the western style of democracy. Which is undoubtedly fruitful and without question a great success in a homogeneous society like great Britain and likewise,but not in india, because it is not a country but a sub-continent which was and still is a composition of different ethnicities,races and religions and the big partners were/are hindu and muslim. As we know hindu had and still has overwhelmingly majority in India, would have succeeded to power after British Raj and in all this game muslims were just shifting their bondage of slavery from British Raj to Hindu Raj.
Jinnah was believer of non violence in politics and thus never ended up in jail, because as I said he does not believe in violence and non democratic tools to get his goal, it is therefore he wasn't a jail bird like Mahatma Gandhi and Nehru. Though Mahatma Gandhi preached non-violence, but covertly used violent methods to yield his goal. And if the reader find himself in disagreement with me then I shall ask you all a question, why on earth, at the end of every protest he (Gandhi)ended up in jail which signals either Mahatma was hypocrite of nature or unable to command the masses. There could be two reason, either he had deficiency and lack of ability to convey his message of non-violence to the recipients of the message or he was disabled by the leaders like Nehru and others.
On the death of Quid-e-Azam a well-known congress leader said, If congress had one Quid-e-Azam and muslim league had 50 Gandhi's, 100 Nehru's Pakistan still be an illusion.
Lollywood.khalidmbhatti.com