The dynamic microphone, very similar in form and function to the conventional loudspeaker, is the industry standard for most applications and is seen most frequently in the hands of a singer or presenter. However, situations can arise for which other solutions are required, say for example, if a microphone is to be worn, or if a miniature, high sensitivity or discrete approach is required. In such circumstances, hi-fi quality though possible may not be as important as proximity or placement in respect to the required source.
Proprietary systems can cost hundreds or even thousands, but surprising results can be obtained at a fraction of such costs.
When designing a sound pickup system a number of elements must be decided from the outset. The choice of microphone itself can be important. An omnidirectional type will pick up sound from all directions, whereas an unidirectional or cardioid type will exhibit a directional characteristic. A magnetic dynamic type may suit most applications offering a low internal noise figure. Electret or FET capsules, although offering higher noise, are far more sensitive (a chart comparing typical replacement capsules can be found at the bottom of the page). A choice of power source will be necessary, eg; mains, battery or both. At the same time, monitoring of an output may be required. Rugged water/weather-proofing will be vital for external use. Ideally, a complete system can be pulled out of a river, the water shaken off and be used immediately.
Sub-aqua applications have been seen where an (expensive) microphone is sealed within one or two condoms and then thrown into the sea. This approach is not recommended. A brief description of an inexpensive and effective hydrophone is given near the end of this page.
A radio-link can be useful but can suffer from disadvantages arising from weak signals, break-through, etc, especially if the source is mobile or the working environment is unknown or untested. The detection of an obvious RF source may be undesirable and encryption or frequency-hopping may be required to avoid interception. Code-division multiple-access (CDMA) has been used for many years by the military for covert and secure communications, since it is highly immune to interference, carries a high level of inherent security and can be made to appear indistinguishable from ordinary broad-band noise. Professional systems are available, some at very high cost, and can be very effective. However, unanticipated pitfalls can become apparent very quickly that can render even the best system useless. Most easily the commonest problem to address is how to survive being dropped, especially into water.
To increase directivity, say for video use, a 'zoom' facility will be required. JVC patented a method where FET mics were staggered in a vented tube. These could then be mixed into an amplifier in order to enhance the forward lobe by some 15dB. This system has been adopted world-wide with a wide variety of copies.
Sometimes a wanted signal will be submerged in extraneous noise and the actual placement of a microphone with respect to it's target can often be the major determining factor in terms of the quality of the signal obtained, a fact noted by recording engineers when say the close miking of a musical instrument reduces ambient reverberation giving a dead and lifeless quality to the recording. Electronic filtering and compression can improve intelligibility enormously, but simply piling on the amplification will not. Compact battery-driven systems will run down faster if forced to accommodate large and unnecessary signals. Low frequencies, in particular, can play havoc and these are best filtered out at the input. Roll-offs at -3dB of 1 or 2Hz are not productive if the intended target is, say, speech when 100Hz (-12dB) will give better results. In this case, an upper roll-off of 5kHz will meet most needs.
Since the operating noise level of a system can be largely due to the impedance of the source, the outputs of a number of microphones can be paralleled which then feed the input of a bus summing amplifier. Details of these are often found in the datasheets of specialist audio preamps. The layout of such an array can be important (see Bessel arrays).
Simplicity is often the key to a successful system. With the advent of mobile phones and personal digital audio, recording that was previously dependent on tape as a storage medium, has been made much easier.
Tip: if, during a 'live' performance, conference or public meeting, a lead to a mixer, for whatever reason, decides to short or open-circuit much delay and embarrassment can arise. The following circuit can be left in circuit during use to provide an instant diagnosis. Obviously, the line tested must be devoid of DC.
Naturally, in critical situations, there should always be a backup.
To increase sensitivity, some form of collector that focusses or directs acoustic energy on to a microphone is as important as an aerial is for a transmission receiver, often the overall performance of the system, regardless how expensive, being limited by this. Extreme examples are sound mirrors.
Experiments were tried with horns and parabolic dishes to focus acoustic energy. These proved adequate and, on occasion, interesting, especially when dealing with reflections, or providing a stereo output. Redundant satellite dishes can be re-used, thus reducing design and construction efforts, although perforated types will require 'smoothing'. However, for those interested here are three web-sites that offer advice on constructing circular parabolic types; one a simple technique, another built from cardboard and another for larger sizes. Other forms exist, for example offset types for microwaves, but most constructors will find the circular form easier to build.
Inaccuracies in a dish's form can be overcome by using a funnel to direct reflected acoustic energy to the microphone, thus offering a larger target area or 'throat'.
If the dish radius equals twice the focal length (f=y=1 and x=2), the microphone supports will be flat and easier to mount. However, the dish aperture will present a signal over a 180° arc to the sensor and, whilst this can be useful with solar heating applications, cancelling can occur. Most microphone apertures will normally be less than this, say 90°, in which case a dish diameter of say 2f can then 'waste' acoustic energy (if mic aperture <90° and f=1, then x=<1). A personally preferred ratio that is easy to remember is that if f=1 and x=root 2 (1.4142135), then y=½=0.5, this supporting a microphone aperture of 140° or less. When physically matching a microphone's 'throat' to a dish, substituting a light source for the microphone will easily identify areas of 'spillage' and 'wastage' in terms of literal illumination.
It must be borne in mind that the larger the diameter of a dish (usually some 0.3-1.2m for audio) the greater it's collecting area and consequent sensitivity will be. This must be weighed against the fact that the greater area of a larger dish can be problematic in high wind speeds in terms of mechanical stability. This can be seen in the table below.
Normally a compromise is required to reduce the dish diameter to a reasonable and manageable size whilst reducing cancellation effects and/or shielding the sensor from unwanted noise emanating from behind the dish. Similar considerations are necessary for storage and transport, since most dishes are not collapsible, together with means to easily demount the sensor and it's supports, whilst being able to remount them again with easily repeatable mechanical accuracy. At the same time, it must be remembered that the total acoustic energy from a large collector can easily destroy a delicate microphone if directed at an even intermittent powerful source (see below). In essence, and rather obviously, sensitive microphones require a smaller dish area than less sensitive types. An assumption that a microphone offering 20dB more sensitivity will require 20dB less dish area can be made although an empirical approach is recommended to determine the best match for any given situation, notwithstanding any spanners that Murphy might decide to throw into the works, susceptibility to extraneous noise being but one.
A microphone fed by a dish, apart from it's aperture (the diaphragm area), should be carefully shielded acoustically to prevent audio pickup from all directions other than that presented by the dish to reduce unwanted signals. Similarly, low frequencies, say from vehicles or strong winds, can make a flimsy dish resonate which can modulate and distort the incoming signal. The back can be ribbed to stiffen it, and can have rubber sheeting bonded to it to dampen vibrations. A ring fitted, or a lip formed, at a dish's edge will help to stiffen it and provide a stronger anchorage for the microphone's/dish's supports. Lightweight, stamped 1m dishes are ideal.
A proprietary solution might include a 20" (50.8cm) segmented and collapsible dish, tripod, amplifier with 3-band equaliser, headphones, quick assembly/disassembly, tape record, patch in of a communications device, adjustable volume for each ear, automatic safety shut off at 95 decibels, tripod mount for extended use and powered by 2 AAA batteries that last about 100 hours. In ideal conditions it might be claimed that it is possible to hear a conversation 300 yards away, with a weight of 1½lbs (0.68Kgs).
To increase the aperture diameter of a small FET mic, curved 'funnels' from redundant smoke alarm output transducers proved very effective, although for external use, some physical means of reducing the input of low frequencies may be required. A dynamic type is less prone to be driven into clipping.
Although potentially extremely effective, if discretion is required a dish is probably the least subtle approach possible unless circumstances allow the use of an obvious satellite dish that has been converted, for example. Under these circumstances, benefit can accrue if the dish is remotely steerable, although the system then may become unnecessarily complex, especially if a visual (camera) output is required as a consequence. Transparent (polyethylene, polycarbonate, etc) types can be obtained reducing visibility. However, the presence of these, if detected, will be a certain give-away. Mottled, drab paint finishes (with matching fabric overlays) can break up a dish's outline, with skill, to the point of invisibility.
In one situation, a wide area was covered by aiming a dish at a slight angle to a large wall adjacent to the target area, reflections from which gave the desired results. Architectural curves can give very distinct acoustic qualities to a building, the Whispering Gallery in St Paul's cathedral being a good example. Some chapels seen have curved ceilings that then merge into the walls presenting an unbroken surface. These tend to reflect any music and singing back down onto the congregation. One former Laura Ashley shop that had been extensively remodelled had a 'dish' in the ceiling above the till area. These principles have been observed in earlier times, for example, take Greek theatres or the very ancient Chalcolithic Goddess Temple on Malta which has chambers cut into the rock which to some ears are harmonic, and obviously resonant, like singing in the shower (see sonics).
Some satellite dishes are offset in that the head will not be aligned on the dish's centre-line but, in normal use, will be angled upwards. For audio, invert the dish so that the microphone is pointed towards the ground, thus helping to prevent the pick-up of aircraft noise, etc, and aiding weather-proofing. Offset types, when rotated 90°, can be more effective for stereo arrangements when two funnels are combined in one 'head' to direct sound on to separate mics. Other non-standard formats are workable too, eg;
Alternatively, for long range use, rifle mikes using a single 'barrel' have been used. These will usually consist of a pipe, open at one end with the mic at the other, to isolate the sound source aimed at. Perforations and damping prevent the tube from resonating.
More complex, but arguably more sensitive, is the 'shotgun' design described by James Hollinger and John Mulligan in the June 1964 edition of Popular Electronics (US). In this approach 37 3/8" aluminium tubes, each an inch shorter than the next (36" to 1") were combined in a hexagonal bundle which was then presented via a funnel to a single crystal microphone. Each tube resonates at a wavelength twice that of it's length giving exceptional sensitivity and directivity. In this case, a frequency response of 186 to 13,392Hz is covered (for speech, 24 tubes of 2-25" can suffice). An unwanted signal at a particular frequency can then be reduced by stopping the relevant tube/s. With the active pickup described below, sensitivity was greatly enhanced. To reduce noise further, say from power-lines or transmitters, a silver-loaded epoxy was used to bond the tubes which were then used as the primary earthing point (spiked out-of-doors).
Provided rigidity problems are addressed, there is no reason why plastic tubes cannot be used, although a metallic structure is stronger and less prone to breakage. As a weight/strength compromise, the longest tube only maybe metal. Advantages, in terms of surveillance say, arise from the much smaller profile presented to the target and portability, compared to a dish.
Some success was obtained subtracting signals - one mic was given a small aperture and a target focussed upon whilst the signal from a second 'wide' mic, in close proximity to the first but aimed in a dissimilar direction, gave a second 'background' signal that could be inverted and subtracted from the first. This arrangement can be improved upon to provide a more discreet form than say a rifle mic or dish. A Bessel array can yield a super-sensitive microphone with a spherical radiation pattern.
With some of these approaches it is possible to record conversations through walls (even in stereo) and across streets through a pane of glass, but every consideration must be accommodated to reduce the input of unwanted noise, including that emanating from the operator. Handling can be reduced with a tripod, it then being possible to pan the microphone with ease. This can be useful since wind can carry a wanted signal away from it's source. Physical isolation of elements, via an air-gap, was found to be best. Wind noise can be curtailed by shielding the pickup with fabric. Similarly, despite water-proofing, the sound of rainfall hitting a mic and/or collector will effectively drown out a signal. In some cases some form of remote handling can be advantageous and, if possible, at the outset of a design process should be considered to increase the flexibility of application.
If experimenting with collectors, it is recommended that provision be made for 'heads' (combined microphone and preamp assemblies) to be changed easily in situ. For example, depending on the situation, a low-gain preamp with an electret capsule may give better results than a high-gain design with a dynamic one. Some designs can include both so that if one head is overmodulated into clipping the other can be switched or mixed in immediately.
The validity of constructing an array for a single pickup can be questioned on the grounds of cost and complexity. However, apart from advantages of reduced noise and greater sensitivity, survival of concentrated and rapid pressure transients from, say, a dish, that can easily exceed a mic's design load is also worth considering. A well-made array can 'lose' half, or more, of it's sensors and still function well, whereas the loss of a single mic in a 'single' system renders it dead and, therefore, useless. A removable physical 'mute' can be considered to reduce sensitivity and/or to protect delicate diaphragms from destructive gradients such as those involved with powerful acoustic sources like thunder, jet engines, fireworks, PA systems, crowds or gunfire. A simple trick, borrowed from aligning satellite dishes, dropped the input by 10dB or more by throwing a towel over the array.
A very wide dynamic range of input sound pressure levels, ranging from about 30dB SPL (ambient noise in a quiet room) to over 130dB SPL (pain threshold) can occur. The output of a low impedance (200R) microphone might then typically vary from 20μV to 2Vrms, while it's self-generated output noise would be in the order of some 0.25μV over a 20kHz bandwidth. Ideally since this dynamic range is so large, a preamp's gain should be adjustable so that it can be optimised for the signal levels that can arise in a number of different situations, ie; large signals should be handled without clipping or excessive distortion and small signals should not be degraded by preamp noise.
A good preamp should contribute no more noise to the output signal than does the source impedance. In practice however, it is often considered reasonable to allow a higher level of input noise in the preamp since ambient room noise will usually cause a noise voltage at the microphone output terminals that is on the order of 30dB greater than the microphone’s intrinsic (due to it's source resistance) noise floor. It is eminently feasible to construct designs with a noise floor >20dB lower than a typical microphone’s output from the 30 dB SPL ambient noise level in a quiet room, this being critical if the intended target has a small amplitude.
When long cables are used with a microphone, interference can be expected, especially from mains hum and RF pick-up. To reduce this problem, the outputs of most professional microphones are balanced, driving a pair of twisted wires with signals of opposite polarity. In theory, magnetic fields will induce equal voltages on each of the two wires which will then be cancelled if the signals are applied to a transformer or differential amplifier. Avoiding the use of transformers has several advantages, including lower cost, smaller physical size and reduced distortion. To prevent interaction, signal and power cables should never run alongside each other and if they must cross should do so at right angles.
Ideally, a microphone should be placed in close proximity to a low-noise preamp thus assisting the integrity of the original signal. Both should be integrated into the same assembly, which is then screened, preferably with steel, although larger diameter copper piping with it's associated fittings can be useful.
Below, in approximate historical order, are a number of designs for both single-ended and balanced applications. A considerate approach from the early '70s improved the bias stability and removed the subsonic ringing evident with some designs. The use of MF resistors and separate hum filters in one build reduced the noise floor further, as can the use of ZTX107C low-noise transistors.
Linsley Hood's exploration of his 'Liniac' paid attention to other simple arrangements.
Some microphone (and RIAA) preamp designs have used paralleled arrays (up to 10 have been seen) of input stages to reduce noise.
Older designs might use BC109C/179C combinations, like the input amplifier used in the Revox A77 (below).
Two types that were used frequently in the '80s included the 2SA1085E and the 2SC2547E. Some later designs have paralleled J-Fets, like the 2SK170BL, with a common bias network for a high-impedance input, although a simpler solution might suffice, eg;
and 'bootstrapping' can be employed.
The next design, although simple and definitely not low-noise, proved very effective as a room pickup.
Both crystal mics were mounted 180° with respect to each other (one at each end of the enclosure) helping reduce induced mains noise, and 741 opamps were used with a 50Hz twin-T notch filter, run from a ±12V supply. High overall acoustic sensitivity results with a self-cancelling of unpleasant reverberation effects. Very easy to upgrade.
A JLH microphone preamp from his '82/3 modular preamplifier,
although there are the 'liniac' designs that might interest.
Designs intended for moving coil cartridges can be used offering lower operating voltages, input noise resistances and a more compact approach if using a medium-power input transistor with a low Rbe. This is useful if low-impedance paralleled arrays are used.
One design compared a variety of types, a MJE13007 giving better performance than a BF459, MJE340 or two BF459s in parallel. Noise floors with these types were some 15dB or lower than using a 'standard' low-noise type like a BC549C.
Dynamic microphones are best used with a differential input. Some instrumentation amplifiers can be modified for optimum audio usage.
Used in high quality mixers this low-noise version will also run at the low levels inherent with battery supplies.
For surveillance, the frequency response can be restricted to reduce unwanted input and would normally be used with a limiter or compressor (see NE571 circuit below). For speech, the usual bandwidth is 300-3kHz, although a slightly wider range, or low rate of roll-off (12dB or less), will give a more 'natural' sound (a useful variable low/high pass filter is shown below). On a dish, the gain control would be accessible from the front of the 'head'.
Two applications from the same manufacturer are shown below.
To adjust the CMRR, or Common Mode Rejection Ratio, short both inputs together and apply a signal between these and ground, then set the CMRR control for a minimum signal on the output with a number of progressively higher inputs until no meaningful improvement is obtained.
Low-noise ICs can also help to reduce the component count offering, with care, a succinct solution. Analog Device's SSM-2017 offers typical noise of 950pV (gain 1,000) using a single resistor to set the gain.
The NE5534 opamp has been a personal favourite over many years (still found in nine out of ten CD players as an amplifier in the analogue section) and On Semiconductor's AND8177/D application note gives a good range of designs, although be mindful of the numerous errors that it (Rev. 0) contains.
A similar arrangement, and that for a lower noise spec transformer coupled design, is given in the Analog Devices OP37 (rev. B) datasheet together with useful 'Comments on Noise'. Another arrangement that substitutes the input pair.
This article is useful for circuit details of filters used in noise measurement.
Below are more complex approaches reminiscent of earlier paralleled designs. Refer to the device's datasheets for more detailed discussion.
Brief typical specs of some low-noise opamps are given below for comparison. However, it should be borne in mind that to achieve low voltage noise with a bipolar input, high collector currents may be used at the expense of current noise performance (this being directly proportional to the square root of the collector current) thus the requirement for a low source impedance. With a J-FET input, current noise is considerably less and this should be taken into account in noise calculations.
High frequency types, like the AD797, might require more careful supply bypassing when driving heavy loads. For this reason datasheets should be consulted before using a 'new' IC. There is nothing wrong with testing a variety of opamps in a design to determine which gives the best performance. IC sockets, if used, should be of a high quality (turned pin) but bear in mind that the device dissipation will have to be derated to account for the higher chip-to-ambient thermal resistance.
A discrete JLH opamp with FET inputs is shown below.
High performance low-noise ICs like the PMI SSM-2015/6 are worth considering, although their lower operating voltage limits (±9-12V) may not suit some applications. Low-noise instrumentation types like the INA103 and INA217 can offer excellent performance versus component count.
A compact and sensitive active microphone element consisted of a FET mic (or more paralleled, seven for symmetry) feeding a ZN459, and later SL561, linear IC and have proved very effective, the use of tantalum capacitors offering very compact builds.
A specific bandwidth can be easily tailored to suit the application, and a balanced transformer added. Output impedances are low enough to drive head or earphones directly. Ideally, multiple mics should be matched if an array is used. With a fixed gain of 1000 (ZN459), the input is attenuated physically with baffles, some kind of suspension usually being necessary to prevent pickup of, say, normally inaudible traffic noise which can 'swamp' a system rendering it unusable. Rubber suspensions, as found in some cassette recorders, which cover the entire capsule, bar the opening to the electret membrane, are a good start. Unshielded elements and even moving-coil cartridges can be used to detect sub-sonic and other non-air vibrations.
The following variable filter was used to subjectively determine bandwidths before a fixed type was built.
A fixed 2nd order filter for speech frequencies.
Filters can be cascaded to give steep slopes.
Mains hum and rectification byproducts may have to be removed. To this end 50Hz and 100Hz (UK) filters can be useful. The values then chosen for one circuit can then be easily doubled or halved (paralleled or put in series). When the output of a filter is fed back to a node that is normally grounded the notch width can be varied.
This can be useful when, with temperature drift, f can vary. Although there is nothing wrong with ±5% carbon resistors, for best results use ±1% metal-film resistors and polystyrene, mica or polypropylene capacitors for filtering and equalisation. A low temperature coefficient is considered vital. With the node tied at close to the same potential as the output, the notch becomes vanishingly small and peaking can occur as can oscillation.
A compressor can reduce the distortion from high peaks and these can take a variety of forms
and levels of complexity.
AGC (automatic gain control) ICs are available. For audio a fast attack and a slow decay are usually required. Types like the older 76020 had the attack/decay times set internally. The SL6270 gain controlled microphone preamplifier (VOGAD) compressed and limited the output, reducing overmodulation and clipping.
Some applications may benefit from a variable ratio of overall compression,
A fixed version transformed some cassette decks outperforming the Dolby NE545/646B ICs used.
An interesting IC, the Analog Devices SSM-2167, offers a low voltage microphone preamplifier with variable compression and noise gating, all in a 10-pin small outline package.
For monitoring purposes, head or earphones may be required.
IC options to drive headphones include the TDA2822, LM386, TDA7052, TBA820M , LM380 or the class D MAX4297 (>83% efficient). A discrete low-power design intended for solar use can be found here and a simple but adequate design is shown below.
A suitable tone control for this can be found here.
When prototyping, habit has dictated that two preamps be built, then if a problem arises or modifications are made to one, immediate comparisons with the other can be made. Invariably, it is found that a completed (stereo) 'twin' is a good idea and, once tooled up for one PCB a second made at the same time is quicker and easier than repeating the process at a later date.
If mounting axial-leaded resistors in an upright position to reduce PCB area, the longest lead should be connected to the least impedance 'seen', thus reducing the area of a 'sensitive' high impedance side. The same can be said of polystyrene caps which if marked at one end indicates that wire is connected to the outermost foil and is then ideally connected to the least impedance. Stripboard can be useful to about 5MHz. Finish board by cutting runs to minimum length required and binding unused strips to ground. Tinning connecting runs will reduce impedances. Finished and tested PCBs should be cleaned and tropicalised as a matter of course, since greasy fingerprints can lead, in time, to corrosion.
If enclosing or say potting in epoxy to waterproof, bear in mind capacity of cables, if their cores are exposed, to draw water along them.
Soldered connections on microphones can be varnished and the 'face' or diaphragm end can be covered with a water-proof fabric, such as Goretex, which can be glued in place. Capsules should ideally have a metal case, but if plastic is unavoidable this can be given a couple of coats of nickel-loaded paint which can be bonded to the 'head's' metal-work.
Whatever combinations are built, the primary aim is for the lowest possible signal to noise ratio. For best results avoid carbon resistors and use low thermal coefficient 1% metal oxide/film types. If budgets permit, precision wire-wound types can be used. Be mindful that some ceramic capacitors are microphonic and if subjected to movement or contact can act as pickups in their own right! For the same reason both microphone and preamp should be mounted in a soft suspension within a screened enclosure. Although two-part foams can be used for filling, etc, something as simple as bubble-wrap can be very effective, and even better!
If a complex design is envisaged, ensure ease of disassembly for servicing as a priority.
Commercial thick-film modules are available, the Bang-Campbell MM2-5347 microphone preamplifier being but one example. The MAX9810 offers a very small electret condenser microphone cartridge preamplifier, replacing the traditional FET.
Uwe Beis has an interesting page describing the investigation of a low-noise preamp design.
Problems with RF and mains breakthrough should not occur provided normal screening, bypassing, etc precautions are taken. However, if long lead lengths prove troublesome, clip-on ferrite rings can be retro-fitted at each end.
Temperature ranges encountered during external use can play a major role in performance. A number of ICs are more prone to instability at elevated operating temperatures and normal operating life of circuitry will be reduced. The electrolyte of many electrolytics will freeze at around -30°C reducing their effective value to zero. For this reason the doubling of an electrolytic's design value is advised. Wind-chill will substantially reduce a system's temperature further, frozen moisture can then 'stiffen' a diaphragm. Thus, the consideration and use of a wider than normal operating temperature range is desirable. Extreme conditions may require ancillary cooling and/or heating systems, although simple precautions like shielding a system from a hot sun can suffice.
The Crown PZM, using the pressure zone principle, is well known for it's excellent characteristics, especially for recording. This however is simply an omni-directional capsule mounted close to a hard, flat surface which shields in one direction and reflects in another. This gives, approximately, a -3dB rear lobe and +3dB forward lobe, giving an apparent 6dB 'gain'. Improved bass response will be given if the mic is suspended above performers mounted on a metre square sheet, perspex improving 'invisibility'. This solution is more suitable than, say rifle or parabolic mics, whose more directional characteristics can pick up the movements of scene shifters and other stage crew.
Electrostatic microphones can offer good sensitivity and high frequency performance. However, their reliance on a high voltage supply (200V) and other factors can be researched by the reader since they may not readily suit the majority of needs.
A microphone intended to record the song of Drosophila (fruit fly) and other small insects, using a modified low-cost Radio Shack electret capsule is described by H. C. Bennet-Clark, of Oxford University's Department of Zoology ('A Particle Velocity Microphone for the Song of Small Insects and Other Acoustic Measurements', 8 August 1983).
Electret membranes are charged and can collect dust. If an extended low frequency response is not required, the head should be covered with a fine cloth dust shield.
Piezo discs, though limited as pickups, can be used to construct effective hydrophones cheaply. A Loughborough University design (Bender 2), for dolphin whistles, basically takes a 28mm dia ceramic transducer epoxied to the centre of a 3-5mm thick x 60mm dia polycarbonate blank. Sandwiched with another blank separated by a lubricated 40mm dia x 3-5mm 'O'-ring, the thicker ring being better, the two blanks are then clamped together with nylon bolts, bearing in mind the propensity for seawater to 'eat' metals. The cable exit is sealed with epoxy. The preamp should have a high input impedance (1M or more), -3dB roll-offs at 2kHz and 24kHz with a gain of 40-50dB for a line level output or headphones and 10-20dB for a mic input. Some physical means may be found necessary to limit the noise of constant cable/boat movement, although this may defeat the object since little can, or should, be done about curious and playful cetaceans.
With bats the target bandwidth is 15-120kHz (wavelength 22/3mm), 40kHz (8mm) being a common frequency. Although the author is likely to be corrected, evidence apparently exists for 'regional accents' amongst animals, including cows, so in-built flexibility is recommended to accommodate these. Major considerations, apart from choosing an effective sensor, due to the low signal levels, are dividing the wanted signal to an audible level whilst retaining information about variations of amplitude and short duration bursts (as can be the case with dolphins and other animals that employ ultrasonics). Using conventional frequency dividers, these can be lost. An 'advanced frequency division bat detector' can be found here. Oscillators and mixers are used in heterodyne bat detectors, so self-contained AM tuner ICs can offer concise solutions.
Given the directionality of ultrasonics and the natural mobility inherent with bats, it is suggested, for more detailed results, that a fixed array is used that covers a large area known to be frequented by bats, long-term recordings (dusk-dawn) then being made. These can be searched for periods of peak activity, and adjustments decided accordingly.
Animals can be sensitive to 'intrusions' in to their space. A microphone and tripod appearing on a forest or woodland floor can provoke challenges, thus informing most wildlife in the area that something is amiss then altering the dynamics that one wishes to be captured, nightingales, for example. Rodents might find something nice and new to chew. An all-metal (preferably non-reflective) and waterproof construction is desirable which can be hidden in undergrowth.
Piezo transducers can also be used to detect mechanical vibrations, eg; from engines, or to trigger systems. Successful experiments were tried fitting a drummer's synth to the drummer, via a dozen or more discs hidden on various parts of the anatomy.
Lasers can be used to pick up the vibration of a distant picture frame's glass. An ultrasonic carrier will ease the detection of the return beam. A high-pass audio filter should be used to eliminate extraneous LF noise.
A similar arrangement can act as a sensitive seismometer, the more normal form being a large coil fixed to the inside of a metal screening cylinder around a large suspended magnet, the cylinder being fixed to the ground. Multiple coils set at intervals around a heavy speaker magnet can offer directivity but with reduced sensitivity. To overcome this, groups of two or more coils can be wired in series. Because of the magnet's mass the bandwidth of these devices is usually sub-audio.
Some interesting 'piezo' cables, used by the military for example, were considered as guitar pickups and whilst combinations, with high-impedance preamps, were tried, retrospective mounting proved problematic (not a problem for custom designs).
During live performances interesting reverberation effects were introduced using open-reel tape decks fed by room mics and a PA's mixer, the delays between record and play heads creating effective ambiences, some of subtlety, which were then retained on the tape. An African drum group's perambulating performance was enhanced by mics set up for the next band picking up the reverberation from the hall.
Typical specs of low-cost replacement capsules are shown below. Crystal microphones can demonstrate a high sensitivity but are reliant on a high (<1M) input impedance which can deteriorate the S/N ratio (mains, RF pickup, etc). However, the low frequency roll-off at transducer level is useful in reducing unwanted LF noise. Low sensitivity dynamic mics are best suited for close vocal/instrumental use and larger dishes.
In professional systems audio is often fed via a differential line which offers high noise immunity. Sometimes a simple solution is required to provide a symmetrical line output from a device that has none, eg;
To assist in overcoming insertion losses and/or increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, the transmission medium may be 'overdriven'. For example, some IC solutions (eg: SSM2142/3P balanced line driver/receiver) will have an input gain of 2 and an output gain of 0.5. A gain of 5 is used by another design shown below.
The capacitance between the shield and cores can prove problematic if a long input cable run is required. A method is shown below of driving the shield to overcome this.
Loading an input with an inductor and resistor can greatly reduce tendencies to oscillate with low impedance (<10R) loads.
A few other circuits used to send audio signals over long lengths of cable. Basic implementations can use 741 opamps.
The first uses old GPO telephone handsets and can be used over cable runs several kilometres in length. A version hard-wired to a treehouse used a ni-cad (PP3) supply with solar trickle-charging.
Two duplex circuits used for sending two signals in opposite directions down the same length of cable.
Intended to provide an isolated signal from a live TV chassis (separate secondaries on common transformer) the next circuit has been adapted to drive an optic-fibre (separate supplies) through a high-noise (industrial welding) environment.
A long-term voice-activated surveillance system used solar charging and an infra-red transmission medium (LED) focussed by a short internally reflective tube. The entire transmission unit was weatherproofed and successfully disguised as part of the immediate environment remaining undetected for more than a year. The slightly larger reception unit, based on solid-state recording with time/date stamping, was positioned amongst nearby trees. The memory, based on an USB flash drive, was replaced by an identical unit when required, 8Mb equating with 3 hours recording time (300Hz-3.2kHz). Speech is quite intelligible when infinitely clipped, in other words zero crossing information is sufficient to characterise a word. This allows the use of a simple comparator to reduce speech to a single serial bit stream, eliminating the need for analogue to digital conversion.
There have been very many ways of deriving secret access to communications and this can be a fascinating area of study. Probably the most famous was provided by the Russians who gave the American embassy in Moscow a Seal of the United States of America which was hung in the Ambassador's office. A tight microwave beam was then passed through the building and the seal. A resonant cavity in this modulated the beam with the sound in the room. Equipment in another building then detected the resulting signal. This operated for years before being detected, quite by accident.
Contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org
especially if you want additional content to this page
or if you find any links that don't work. Don't forget
to add the page title or URL. Take care!
Back to sound, index or home
ℼⴭ∧⼼楴汴㹥⼼敨摡ⴾ㸭ਊ猼牣灩⁴祴数∽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩≴ਾ⼯睏敮䥲ੑ慶彟楯影捰⁴‽〵晩 彟楯影捰㹴ㄽ〰簠⁼慍桴昮潬牯䴨瑡慲摮浯⤨ㄪ〰⠯〱ⴰ彟楯影捰⥴ ‾‰ 慶潟煩ⁱ‽潟煩ⁱ籼嬠㭝弊楯煱瀮獵⡨❛楯影摡偤条䉥慲摮Ⱗ䰧捹獯崧㬩弊楯煱瀮獵⡨❛楯影摡偤条䍥瑡Ⱗ䤧瑮牥敮⁴‾敗獢瑩獥崧㬩弊楯煱瀮獵⡨❛楯影摡偤条䱥晩捥捹敬Ⱗ䤧瑮湥❤⥝潟煩異桳嬨漧煩摟呯条崧㬩⠊畦据楴湯⤨笠瘊牡漠煩㴠搠捯浵湥牣慥整汅浥湥⡴猧牣灩❴㬩漠煩琮灹‽琧硥⽴慪慶捳楲瑰㬧漠煩愮祳据㴠琠畲㭥漊煩献捲㴠搠捯浵湥潬慣楴湯瀮潲潴潣⼧瀯睯敮楲敮⽴瑳獡猯氯捹獯獪㬧瘊牡猠㴠搠捯浵湥敧䕴敬敭瑮䉳呹条慎敭✨捳楲瑰⤧せ㭝猠瀮牡湥乴摯湩敳瑲敂潦敲漨煩⥳⥽⤨⼊⼯⼯⼯䜠潯汧湁污瑹捩ੳ慶束煡㴠张慧ⁱ籼嬠㭝弊慧異桳嬨弧敳䅴捣畯瑮Ⱗ✠䅕㈭㐱㈰㤶ⴵㄲ崧㬩弊慧異桳嬨弧敳䑴浯楡乮浡❥愧杮汥楦敲挮浯崧㬩弊慧異桳嬨弧敳䍴獵潴噭牡Ⱗㄠ洧浥敢彲慮敭Ⱗ✠摳瀯畡歬浥汢❥崳㬩弊慧異桳嬨弧牴捡偫条癥敩❷⥝昨湵瑣潩⡮ †慶慧㴠搠捯浵湥牣慥整汅浥湥⡴猧牣灩❴㬩朠祴数㴠✠整瑸樯癡獡牣灩❴※慧愮祳据㴠琠畲㭥 朠牳‽✨瑨灴㩳‧㴽搠捯浵湥潬慣楴湯瀮潲潴潣‿栧瑴獰⼺猯汳‧›栧瑴㩰⼯睷❷ ⸧潧杯敬愭慮祬楴獣挮浯术獪㬧 瘠牡猠㴠搠捯浵湥敧䕴敬敭瑮䉳呹条慎敭✨捳楲瑰⤧せ㭝猠瀮牡湥乴摯湩敳瑲敂潦敲木ⱡ猠㬩紊⠩㬩ਊ⼯⼯⼯䰠捹獯䤠楮楴污穩瑡潩⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯ਯ慶祬潣彳摡㴠䄠牲祡⤨慶祬潣彳敳牡档煟敵祲㴠∠㬢瘊牡氠捹獯潟汮慯彤楴敭㭲ਊ慶浣牟汯‽氢癩≥慶浣桟獯⁴‽愢杮汥楦敲氮捹獯挮浯㬢瘊牡挠彭慴楸‽⼢敭扭牥浥敢摤摥㬢瘊牡愠杮汥楦敲浟浥敢彲慮敭㴠∠摳瀯畡歬浥汢≥慶湡敧晬物彥敭扭牥灟条‽猢⽤慰汵敫扭敬猯畯摮搹栮浴≬慶湡敧晬物彥慲楴杮彳慨桳㴠∠㐱㐸㤹㐶㐶携㔹㌹捣㍣〱㈷っ㥡㑦挶㘶戸㌲㜷ぢ∶瘊牡氠捹獯慟彤慣整潧祲㴠笠搢潭≺∺敨污桴⽜摡楤瑣潩獮Ⱒ漢瑮牡敧≴∺䌦呁栽慥瑬♨㉌䅃㵔楤敳獡獥㈥愰摮㈥挰湯楤楴湯♳㍌䅃㵔畳獢慴据╥〲扡獵≥∬楦摮睟慨≴∺浥楡扡獵≥㭽ਊ慶祬潣彳摡牟浥瑯彥摡牤㴠∠㐵ㄮ㠹ㄮ⸰㠱∱慶祬潣彳摡睟睷獟牥敶‽眢睷愮杮汥楦敲氮捹獯挮浯㬢瘊牡攠楤彴楳整畟汲㴠∠睷湡敧晬物祬潣潣⽭慬摮湩⽧慬摮湩浴汰甿浴獟畯捲㵥潨獵♥瑵彭敭楤浵氽湡楤杮慰敧甦浴损浡慰杩㵮潴汯慢汲湩≫㰊猯牣灩㹴㰊捳楲瑰琠灹㵥琢硥⽴慪慶捳楲瑰•牳㵣栢瑴㩰⼯捳楲瑰祬潣潣⽭慣浴湡椯楮獪㸢⼼捳楲瑰ਾ㰊捳楲瑰琠灹㵥琧硥⽴慪慶捳楲瑰㸧 慶潧杯敬慴‽潧杯敬慴籼笠㭽 潧杯敬慴浣‽潧杯敬慴浣籼嬠㭝 昨湵瑣潩⡮ †瘠牡朠摡‽潤畣敭瑮挮敲瑡䕥敬敭瑮✨捳楲瑰⤧†朠摡獡湹‽牴敵†朠摡祴数㴠✠整瑸樯癡獡牣灩❴†瘠牡甠敳卓⁌‽栧瑴獰✺㴠‽潤畣敭瑮氮捯瑡潩牰瑯捯汯†朠摡牳‽用敳卓⁌‿栧瑴獰✺㨠✠瑨灴✺ ਫ††✠⼯睷潧杯敬慴獧牥楶散潣⽭慴⽧獪术瑰樮❳†瘠牡渠摯‽潤畣敭瑮朮瑥汅浥湥獴祂慔乧浡⡥猧牣灩❴嬩崰†渠摯慰敲瑮潎敤椮獮牥䉴晥牯⡥慧獤潮敤㬩 ⥽⤨⼼捳楲瑰ਾਊ猼牣灩⁴祴数✽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩❴ਾ朠潯汧瑥条挮摭瀮獵⡨畦据楴湯⤨笠 †潧杯敬慴敤楦敮汓瑯✨㤯㤵㌶㤵⼶乁彇〳砰㔲弰晤❰㍛〰㔲崰搧癩札瑰愭ⵤ㐱〵〲㐷㐸㜰ⴰ✰⸩摡卤牥楶散木潯汧瑥条瀮扵摡⡳⤩†朠潯汧瑥条攮慮汢卥牥楶散⡳㬩 ⥽⼼捳楲瑰ਾ㰊捳楲瑰琠灹㵥琧硥⽴慪慶捳楲瑰㸧 潧杯敬慴浣異桳昨湵瑣潩⡮ †朠潯汧瑥条搮晥湩卥潬⡴⼧㔹㘹㔳㘹䄯䝎慟潢敶㝟㠲㥸弰晤❰㝛㠲〹ⱝ✠楤灧摡ㄭ㔴㈰㜰㠴〴〷ㄭ⤧愮摤敓癲捩⡥潧杯敬慴異慢獤⤨㬩 †潧杯敬慴湥扡敬敓癲捩獥⤨素㬩㰊猯牣灩㹴ਊ猼牣灩⁴祴数✽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩❴ਾ朠潯汧瑥条挮摭瀮獵⡨畦据楴湯⤨笠 †潧杯敬慴敤楦敮汓瑯✨㤯㤵㌶㤵⼶乁彇敢潬彷㈷堸〹摟灦Ⱗ嬠㈷ⰸ㤠崰搧癩札瑰愭ⵤ㐱〵〲㐷㐸㜰ⴰ✲⸩摡卤牥楶散木潯汧瑥条瀮扵摡⡳⤩†朠潯汧瑥条攮慮汢卥牥楶散⡳㬩 ⥽⼼捳楲瑰ਾਊ猼牣灩⁴祴数∽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩≴ਾ昨湵瑣潩⡮獩⥖笠 †椠ℨ獩⥖笠 †††爠瑥牵㭮 †素ਊ††⼯桴獩氮捹獯獟慥捲彨畱牥⁹‽祬潣彳敧彴敳牡档牟晥牥敲⡲㬩 †瘠牡愠䵤牧㴠渠睥䄠䵤湡条牥⤨††慶祬潣彳牰摯獟瑥㴠愠䵤牧挮潨獯健潲畤瑣敓⡴㬩 †瘠牡猠潬獴㴠嬠氢慥敤扲慯摲Ⱒ∠敬摡牥潢牡㉤Ⱒ∠潴汯慢彲浩条≥琢潯扬牡瑟硥≴猢慭汬潢≸琢灯灟潲潭Ⱒ∠潦瑯牥∲∬汳摩牥崢††慶摡慃⁴‽桴獩氮捹獯慟彤慣整潧祲††摡杍敳䙴牯散偤牡浡✨慰敧Ⱗ⠠摡慃⁴☦愠䍤瑡搮潭⥺㼠愠䍤瑡搮潭⁺›洧浥敢❲㬩ਊ††晩⠠桴獩氮捹獯獟慥捲彨畱牥⥹笠 †††愠䵤牧献瑥潆捲摥慐慲⡭欢祥潷摲Ⱒ琠楨祬潣彳敳牡档煟敵祲㬩 †素ਠ††汥敳椠愨䍤瑡☠…摡慃楦摮睟慨⥴笠 †††愠䵤牧献瑥潆捲摥慐慲⡭欧祥潷摲Ⱗ愠䍤瑡昮湩彤桷瑡㬩 †素ਊ††潦瘨牡猠椠汳瑯⥳笠 †††瘠牡猠潬⁴‽汳瑯孳嵳††††晩⠠摡杍獩汓瑯癁楡慬汢⡥汳瑯⤩笠 †††††琠楨祬潣彳摡獛潬嵴㴠愠䵤牧朮瑥汓瑯猨潬⥴††††††ਊ††摡杍敲摮牥效摡牥⤨††摡杍敲摮牥潆瑯牥⤨⡽昨湵瑣潩⡮ ††慶⁷‽ⰰ栠㴠〠業楮畭呭牨獥潨摬㴠㌠〰††晩⠠潴⁰㴽猠汥⥦笠 †††爠瑥牵牴敵†† †椠琨灹潥⡦楷摮睯椮湮牥楗瑤⥨㴠‽渧浵敢❲⤠笠 †††眠㴠眠湩潤湩敮坲摩桴††††‽楷摮睯椮湮牥效杩瑨††††汥敳椠搨捯浵湥潤畣敭瑮汅浥湥⁴☦⠠潤畣敭瑮搮捯浵湥䕴敬敭瑮挮楬湥坴摩桴簠⁼潤畣敭瑮搮捯浵湥䕴敬敭瑮挮楬湥䡴楥桧⥴ ††††⁷‽潤畣敭瑮搮捯浵湥䕴敬敭瑮挮楬湥坴摩桴††††‽潤畣敭瑮搮捯浵湥䕴敬敭瑮挮楬湥䡴楥桧㭴 †素 †攠獬晩⠠潤畣敭瑮戮摯⁹☦⠠潤畣敭瑮戮摯汣敩瑮楗瑤籼搠捯浵湥潢祤挮楬湥䡴楥桧⥴ ††††⁷‽潤畣敭瑮戮摯汣敩瑮楗瑤㭨 †††栠㴠搠捯浵湥潢祤挮楬湥䡴楥桧㭴 †素ਊ††敲畴湲⠠眨㸠洠湩浩浵桔敲桳汯⥤☠…栨㸠洠湩浩浵桔敲桳汯⥤㬩紊⤨⤩㬩ਊਊ楷摮睯漮汮慯‽畦据楴湯⤨笠 †瘠牡映㴠搠捯浵湥敧䕴敬敭瑮祂摉∨祬潣䙳潯整䅲≤㬩 †瘠牡戠㴠搠捯浵湥敧䕴敬敭瑮䉳呹条慎敭∨潢祤⤢せ㭝 †戠愮灰湥䍤楨摬昨㬩 †映献祴敬搮獩汰祡㴠∠汢捯≫††潤畣敭瑮朮瑥汅浥湥䉴䥹⡤氧捹獯潆瑯牥摁䙩慲敭⤧献捲㴠✠愯浤愯⽤潦瑯牥摁椮牦浡瑨汭㬧ਊ††⼯匠楬敤湉敪瑣潩੮††昨湵瑣潩⡮ ††††慶‽潤畣敭瑮挮敲瑡䕥敬敭瑮✨晩慲敭⤧††††瑳汹潢摲牥㴠✠✰††††瑳汹慭杲湩㴠〠††††瑳汹楤灳慬⁹‽戧潬正㬧 †††攠献祴敬挮獳汆慯⁴‽爧杩瑨㬧 †††攠献祴敬栮楥桧⁴‽㈧㐵硰㬧 †††攠献祴敬漮敶晲潬⁷‽栧摩敤❮††††瑳汹慰摤湩‽㬰 †††攠献祴敬眮摩桴㴠✠〳瀰❸††⥽⤨ਊ††⼯䈠瑯潴摁䤠橮捥楴湯 †⠠映湵瑣潩⡮ ††††慶‽潤畣敭瑮朮瑥汅浥湥獴祂慔乧浡⡥戢摯≹嬩崰 †††瘠牡椠晩㴠搠捯浵湥牣慥整汅浥湥⡴椧牦浡❥㬩 †††椠晩献祴敬戮牯敤‽〧㬧 †††椠晩献祴敬洮牡楧‽㬰 †††椠晩献祴敬搮獩汰祡㴠✠汢捯❫††††楩瑳汹獣䙳潬瑡㴠✠楲桧❴††††楩瑳汹敨杩瑨㴠✠㔲瀴❸††††楩瑳汹癯牥汦睯㴠✠楨摤湥㬧 †††椠晩献祴敬瀮摡楤杮㴠〠††††楩瑳汹楷瑤‽㌧〰硰㬧 †††椠晩献捲㴠✠愯浤愯⽤湩敪瑣摁椮牦浡瑨汭㬧 †††ਠ††††慶摣癩㴠搠捯浵湥牣慥整汅浥湥⡴搧癩⤧††††摣癩献祴敬㴠∠楷瑤㩨〳瀰㭸慭杲湩ㄺ瀰⁸畡潴∻††††摣癩愮灰湥䍤楨摬 楩㬩 †††椠⡦戠⤠ †††笠 †††††戠椮獮牥䉴晥牯⡥摣癩慬瑳桃汩⥤††††††⥽⤨紊ਊ㰊猯牣灩㹴ਊ猼祴敬ਾ⌉潢祤⸠摡敃瑮牥汃獡筳慭杲湩〺愠瑵絯㰊猯祴敬ਾ㰊楤⁶瑳汹㵥戢捡杫潲湵㩤愣敢昶㬶戠牯敤潢瑴浯ㄺ硰猠汯摩⌠〵愷㜸※潰楳楴湯爺汥瑡癩㭥稠椭摮硥㤺㤹㤹㤹㸢 †㰠ⴡ敓牡档䈠硯ⴠ㸭㰊ⴡ㰭潦浲渠浡㵥猢慥捲≨漠卮扵業㵴爢瑥牵敳牡档瑩⤨•摩✽敨摡牥獟慥捲❨㸠 †††††㰠湩異⁴祴数∽整瑸•汰捡桥汯敤㵲匢慥捲≨猠穩㵥〳渠浡㵥猢慥捲㉨•慶畬㵥∢ਾ††††††椼灮瑵琠灹㵥戢瑵潴≮瘠污敵∽潇∡漠䍮楬正∽敳牡档瑩⤨㸢 †††††㰠是牯㹭 †††††㰠瑳汹㹥 †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲††††††††楷瑤㩨㤠㘱硰††††††††慭杲湩›‰畡潴㠠硰††††††††潰楳楴湯›敲慬楴敶††††††ਊ††††††潦浲栣慥敤彲敳牡档椠灮瑵笠 †††††††栠楥桧㩴㐠瀰㭸 †††††††映湯楳敺›㐱硰††††††††楬敮栭楥桧㩴㐠瀰㭸 †††††††瀠摡楤杮›‰瀸㭸 †††††††戠硯猭穩湩㩧戠牯敤潢㭸 †††††††戠捡杫潲湵㩤⌠㑆㉆㥅††††††††潢摲牥›瀱⁸潳楬䈣䉂䈸㬸 †††††††琠慲獮瑩潩㩮戠捡杫潲湵ⵤ潣潬〳洰慥敳漭瑵ਬ††††††††††††††潣潬〳洰慥敳†††††† †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲湩異孴祴数∽整瑸崢笠 †††††††眠摩桴›〱┰††††††††††††潦浲栣慥敤彲敳牡档椠灮瑵瑛灹㵥琢硥≴㩝潦畣††††††††潢摲牥挭汯牯›䄣䐲㔰㬴 †††††††戠捡杫潲湵ⵤ潣潬㩲⌠晦㭦 †††††††戠硯猭慨潤㩷〠〠硰ㄠ瀲⁸㐭硰⌠㉁い㐵††††††ਊ †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲湩異孴祴数∽畢瑴湯崢笠 †††††††瀠獯瑩潩㩮愠獢汯瑵㭥 †††††††琠灯›瀱㭸 †††††††爠杩瑨›瀱㭸 †††††††漠慰楣祴›㬱 †††††††戠捡杫潲湵㩤⌠䙄䍄䙃††††††††潣潬㩲⌠㘴㜳㐳††††††††楷瑤㩨ㄠ㔲硰††††††††畣獲牯›潰湩整㭲 †††††††栠楥桧㩴㌠瀸㭸 †††††††戠牯敤㩲渠湯㭥 †††††素 †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲湩異孴祴数∽整瑸崢昺捯獵縠椠灮瑵瑛灹㵥戧瑵潴❮㩝潨敶Ⱳ †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲湩異孴祴数✽畢瑴湯崧栺癯牥笠 †††††††戠捡杫潲湵ⵤ潣潬㩲⌠㕁䕃㘵††††††††潣潬㩲⌠晦㭦 †††††素 †††††映牯⍭敨摡牥獟慥捲湩異孴祴数∽整瑸崢昺捯獵縠椠灮瑵瑛灹㵥戧瑵潴❮⁝††††††††慢正牧畯摮挭汯牯›㔣䄲䑅㭆 †††††††挠汯牯›昣晦†††††† †††††㰠猯祴敬ਾ †††††㰠捳楲瑰ਾ††††††畦据楴湯猠慥捲楨⡴笩 †††††††ਠ††††††††⼯搠瑥牥業敮攠癮物湯敭瑮ਠ††††††††慶敳牡档敟癮ਠ††††††††晩⠠祬潣彳摡睟睷獟牥敶湩敤佸⡦⸢摰∮ ‾ㄭ †††††††††猠慥捲彨湥⁶‽栧瑴㩰⼯敳牡档㈵瀮祬潣潣⽭⽡㬧 †††††††素攠獬晩⠠祬潣彳摡睟睷獟牥敶湩敤佸⡦⸢慱∮ ‾ㄭ †††††††††猠慥捲彨湥⁶‽栧瑴㩰⼯敳牡档㈵焮祬潣潣⽭⽡㬧 †††††††素攠獬†††††††††猠慥捲彨湥⁶‽栧瑴㩰⼯敳牡档㈵氮捹獯挮浯愯✯†††††††† †††††瘠牡猠慥捲彨整浲㴠攠据摯啥䥒潃灭湯湥⡴潤畣敭瑮献慥捲敳牡档⸲慶畬⥥ †††††瘠牡猠慥捲彨牵‽敳牡档敟癮猫慥捲彨整浲††††††楷摮睯漮数⡮敳牡档畟汲㬩ਊ††††††敲畴湲映污敳 †††††素 †††††㰠猯牣灩㸭 †††㰠ⴡ攭摮猠慥捲潢⁸ⴭਾਊ††搼癩挠慬獳∽摡敃瑮牥汃獡≳猠祴敬∽楤灳慬㩹汢捯Ⅻ浩潰瑲湡㭴漠敶晲潬㩷楨摤湥※楷瑤㩨ㄹ瀶㭸㸢 †††㰠牨晥∽瑨灴⼺眯睷愮杮汥楦敲氮捹獯挮浯∯琠瑩敬∽湁敧晬物潣㩭戠極摬礠畯牦敥眠扥楳整琠摯祡∡猠祴敬∽楤灳慬㩹汢捯㭫映潬瑡氺晥㭴眠摩桴ㄺ㘸硰※潢摲牥〺㸢 †††㰠浩牳㵣⼢摡⽭摡愯杮汥楦敲昭敲䅥灪≧愠瑬∽楓整栠獯整祢䄠杮汥楦敲挮浯›畂汩潹牵映敲敷獢瑩潴慤ⅹ•瑳汹㵥搢獩汰祡戺潬正※潢摲牥〺•㸯 †††㰠愯ਾ††††搼癩椠㵤愢彤潣瑮楡敮≲猠祴敬∽楤灳慬㩹汢捯Ⅻ浩潰瑲湡㭴映潬瑡氺晥㭴眠摩桴㜺㠲硰∠ਾ††††††猼牣灩⁴祴数∽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩≴搾捯浵湥牷瑩⡥祬潣彳摡❛敬摡牥潢牡❤⥝㰻猯牣灩㹴 †††㰠搯癩ਾ††⼼楤㹶㰊搯癩ਾ㰊ⴡ⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯⼯ ⴭਾ猼牣灩⁴祴数∽整瑸樯癡獡牣灩≴搾捯浵湥牷瑩⡥祬潣彳摡❛汳摩牥崧㬩⼼捳楲瑰ਾਊ搼癩椠㵤氢捹獯潆瑯牥摁•瑳汹㵥戢捡杫潲湵㩤愣敢昶㬶戠牯敤潴㩰瀱⁸潳楬㔣㜰㡡㬷挠敬牡戺瑯㭨搠獩汰祡渺湯㭥瀠獯瑩潩㩮敲慬楴敶※湩敤㩸㤹㤹㤹∹ਾ搼癩挠慬獳∽摡敃瑮牥汃獡≳猠祴敬∽楤灳慬㩹汢捯Ⅻ浩潰瑲湡㭴漠敶晲潬㩷楨摤湥※楷瑤㩨㌹瀶㭸㸢ऊ搼癩椠㵤愢汦湩獫潨摬牥•瑳汹㵥昢潬瑡氺晥㭴眠摩桴ㄺ㘸硰∻ਾ††††愼栠敲㵦栢瑴㩰⼯睷湡敧晬物祬潣潣⽭•楴汴㵥䄢杮汥楦敲挮浯›畢汩潹牵映敲敷獢瑩潴慤ⅹ•瑳汹㵥搢獩汰祡戺潬正※潢摲牥〺㸢 †††††㰠浩牳㵣⼢摡⽭摡愯杮汥楦敲昭敲䅥㉤樮杰•污㵴匢瑩潨瑳摥戠⁹湁敧晬物潣㩭䈠極摬礠畯牦敥眠扥楳整琠摯祡∡猠祴敬∽楤灳慬㩹汢捯㭫戠牯敤㩲∰⼠ਾ††††⼼㹡 †㰠搯癩ਾ††椼牦浡摩∽祬潣䙳潯整䅲楤牆浡≥猠祴敬∽潢摲牥〺※楤灳慬㩹汢捯㭫映潬瑡氺晥㭴栠楥桧㩴㘹硰※癯牥汦睯栺摩敤㭮瀠摡楤杮〺※楷瑤㩨㔷瀰≸㰾椯牦浡㹥㰊搯癩ਾ⼼楤㹶ਊਊ