Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Osmosis Lab

Aleksandar Nelson Nacev

 

Planning A:

 

            Question:  Is it possible to determine which substances will pass through a semi-permeable membrane, and how does the concentration gradient affect the rate of osmosis?

 

            Hypothesis:  By using dialysis tubing and the substances glucose, starch, albumin, silver nitrate, and sodium chloride, one will be able to determine which of these substances will pass through a semi-permeable membrane.  By using differing concentrations of sucrose as a solute, one can determine the affect that concentration gradient has on the rate of osmosis.

 

            Variables:

            First Section:

                        Dependent:  The substances able to pass through a membrane

                        Independent:  The substances used

            Second Section:

                        Dependent:  The rate of osmosis

                        Independent:  The concentration gradient of the solutions

                        Control:  A solution of pure de-ionized water

 

Planning B:

 

            First Section:

 

                        Materials:

 

·        Two sections of Dialysis Tubing

·        Four Pieces of String

·        Two beakers

·        Solutions of Glucose, Starch, Albumin, silver nitrate, sodium chloride

·        Water

·        10 mL pipette and pipette pump

·        Four graduated cylinders

·        Four test tubes

 

Procedure:

 

1.                  Open each section of dialysis tubing and tie one end with a piece of string.

2.                  To one piece of tubing add 20 mL, using the graduated cylinders, of glucose, starch albumin and albumin.  Then tie the other end shut with a piece of string.

3.                  To the other section of tubing add 20 mL of sodium chloride and tie the other end shut with a piece of string.

4.                  Add each section of tubing to separate beakers filled halfway with water.  Label the beakers either combination or sodium chloride.  Make sure not to submerge the end in which the substances were poured into due to contamination of the water.

1.                  Allow the tubing to set for five minutes.

2.                  Add 20 mL of silver nitrate to the sodium chloride beaker and record the visual results of both inside the tubing (relates to silver nitrate) and outside the tubing in the beaker(relates to sodium chloride).

3.                  Take three 3 mL samples of water solution outside of the tubing from the combination beaker and place into separate test tubes.

4.                  In one test tube use a glucose test strip to check for the presence of glucose. Record the results.

5.                  In another test tube add iodine to the solution to test for the presence of starch. Record the results.

6.                  In the last test tube add benedict’s testing reagent to test for the presence of protein.  Record the results.

 

Second Section:

 

            Materials:

·        Six beakers

·        Six sections of dialysis tubing

·        Concentrations of .2 M, .4M, .6M, .8M and 1M of sucrose

·        De-ionized water

·        Graduated Cylinders

·        Stopwatch

·        String

 

Procedure:

1.                  Open each section of dialysis tubing and tie one end with a piece of string.

2.                  To each section of tubing add either de-ionized water, .2 M, .4M, .6M, .8M or 1M of sucrose.  Then tie shut the other end of the tubing.

3.                  Weigh each section of tubing and record values as initial.

4.                  Obtain six beakers filled halfway with de-ionized water.

5.                  Place each tubing section in a separate beaker and start the stop watch.

6.                  At each five minute interval, remove the bags and weigh them recording the results.

 

Data Collection:

            First Section:

 

Visual Results

 

Substance

Visual Result

Glucose

No change on test strip

Starch

Remained an orange-yellow color

Albumin

Remained a blue color

Silver Nitrate

No precipitate inside of the tubing

Sodium Chloride

Precipitate present in beaker water

 

            Second Section:

 

Weight of Bags

 

Concentration

Initial Weight (g)

5 min Mark

(g)

10 min Mark (g)

15 min Mark (g)

20 min Mark (g)

25 min Mark (g)

30 min Mark (g)

Water

20.72

21.34

21.90

22.32

21.79

21.86

22.03

.2 M Sucrose

21.08

22.65

23.47

23.78

24.24

24.34

24.11

.4 M Sucrose

22.30

23.98

24.51

25.22

26.14

26.18

26.82

.6 M Sucrose

22.36

23.96

24.80

25.93

26.32

26.95

27.53

.8 M Sucrose

23.45

25.00

26.48

28.92

29.75

30.95

31.95

1 M Sucrose

23.54

26.50

27.67

27.80

28.84

29.64

30.56

 

Data Analysis:

 

            First Section:

 

·        If glucose passed through, then the water outside the bag would change the test strips color.

·        If starch passed through, then the water outside the bag would change to a dark blue when iodine was added.

·        If albumin passed through, then the water outside the bag would change to a purple when the Benedict’s reagent was added.

·        If sodium chloride passed through the membrane, then there would be precipitate outside of the dialysis tubing.

·        If silver nitrate passed through then there would be precipitate inside of the dialysis tubing.

 

Analytical Results

 

Substance

Visual Result

Did the Substance Pass Through

Glucose

No change on test strip

Negative

Starch

Remained an orange-yellow color

Negative

Albumin

Remained a blue color

Negative

Silver Nitrate

No precipitate inside of the tubing

Negative

Sodium Chloride

Precipitate present in beaker water

Positive

 

 

            Second Section:

 

 

Example:

 

 

Percent Change in Mass

 

Concentration

0-5 min

5-10 min

10-15 min

15-20 min

20-25 min

25-30 min

Water

2.992 %

2.624 %

1.918 %

-2.375 %

.3212 %

.7777 %

.2 M Sucrose

7.448 %

3.620 %

1.321 %

1.934 %

.4125 %

-.9449 %

.4 M Sucrose

7.534 %

2.210 %

2.897 %

3.648 %

.1530 %

2.445 %

.6 M Sucrose

7.156 %

3.506 %

4.556 %

1.504 %

2.394 %

2.152 %

.8 M Sucrose

6.610 %

5.920 %

9.215 %

2.870 %

4.034 %

3.231 %

1 M Sucrose

12.57 %

4.415 %

.4698 %

3.741 %

2.774 %

3.104 %

 

 

Average Percent Change

 

Concentration

Average Percent Change By Mass

Water

1.04%

.2 M Sucrose

2.30%

.4 M Sucrose

3.15%

.6 M Sucrose

3.54%

.8 M Sucrose

5.31%

1 M Sucrose

4.51%

 

 

Conclusion and Evaluation:

 

            First Section:

 

                        When viewing the results of this lab, one can conclude that every substance except for sodium chloride was not allowed to pass through the dialysis tubing.  Consequently in a plasma membrane only sodium chloride could pass through.  All of the other substances, if wished to be utilized by the cell must be brought in by proteins.  This test also proves the existence of proteins in a cell membrane.  One knows that glucose must be brought into a cell for energy, however, the lipid bi-layer will not allow for glucose to pass through.  Thus there must be certain proteins present which act as transport vehicles to allow glucose to enter the cell otherwise the cell would not be able to carry out cellular respiration.  One source of error in this lab could stem from the fact that when the bags were placed into the beakers, if the tops of the bags, where the substances were poured into, touched the water, then the residue left from pouring could contaminant the water thus creating false positives.  To help correct this issue, one should carefully place the bags into the water.

 

            Second Section:

 

                        When our groups results for the average percent change of mass is compared to the class’s average for percent change of mass, one gets the table below.

 

Average Percent Changes of Mass Compared

 

Concentration

Our Lab

The Class Average

Water

1.04%

0.530 %

.2 M Sucrose

2.30%

2.75 %

.4 M Sucrose

3.15%

4.74 %

.6 M Sucrose

3.54%

6.23 %

.8 M Sucrose

5.31%

9.46 %

1 M Sucrose

4.51%

10.3 %

 

When one compares the class data to our lab group’s data, there are some significant discrepancies.  The lower concentrations are fairly similar, however, when reach .8 M and 1 M there is a significant difference in the average percent change by mass. Our peak rate of osmosis occurred in our .8 M solution, the class peak occurred in the 1 M solution.  Therefore, our lab had a significant source of error somewhere.  Unfortunately, I cannot recall our group performing the experiment with any major mistakes.  Perhaps the temperature difference between the morning classes and the afternoon classes caused the significant change in data.  Unfortunately I do not think I can be exactly sure what caused the discrepancy without going through the lab again, but taking the average of the class data does help even out the results.