Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Michael Poon's Shrine of Neurology

HOME

CONTENTS

CONTACT US

HOME
SEARCH
INTRODUCTION
BIOGRAPHY
CONTENTS
WEBSITE PROBLEMS
CONTACT US

Outcome of coma in ICU

(for hypoxic cerebral injury)

05 November 2004

Outcome of coma in ICU 

1.     abnormal brainstem response (abnormal pupil, corneal, oculocephalic)

2.     no withdrawal to pain

3.     no verbal response

4.     creatinine >132.6 umol/l

5.     > 70 years

coma persisting for more than 3 days with 4/5 factors has poor outcome (5% probability of survival at 2 mths)

 

The role of EEG in prognosis of anoxic cerebral injury. 

Grade 1. “Near normal”

Excellent prognosis unless  “locked in”or alpha pattern coma 

Grade 2. Theta dominant

If reactive the prognosis is very good

If nonreactive survival is usually accompanied by neurological

sequelae

Grade 3. Delta dominant

If reactive the prognosis can be good

If non-reactive the prognosis is grave provided drugs and hypothermia

excluded.

Grade 4. Burst suppression & continuous bilateral periodic sharp waves

Prognosis grave if drugs and hypothermia excluded

Often associated with clinical myoclonus.

Grade 5. Isoelectric

Prognosis grave if drugs and hypothermia excluded.

 

Alpha pattern coma 

Anterior predominance

Unreactive alpha frequency activity.

Rare survivors but only if brain stem reflexes intact

 

Theta pattern coma

Usually elderly

5 Hz theta with low amplitude burst suppression morphology

Grave prognosis

 

Spindle coma

Usually head injury, rarely anoxic injury

resembles stage II sleep

prognostically benign.

 

The role of EEG in coma prognosis in anoxic injury

The difficult group are grade II nonreactives and grade III. These are also the most common groups.

SEPs are useful to further define the prognosis in these groups

 

The role of SEPs in anoxic cerebral injury and severe head injury

The bilateral absent of the “thalamo-cortical” wave forms (N19, N20, N1)signifies that the patient will not recover to better than PVS (persistent vegetative state)………….100% specificity

However sensitivity is low (20-30 %).

Hence the interest in the N70

 

N70

      Madl et al

“Of 113 patients with a bilateral N70 peak latency >130 msec or absent all but one had a poor outcome”

Sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 97%

      Sherman et al

Using a bilateral N70 peak latency > 176 msec all had a poor outcome

Sensitivity 78% and specificity of 100%

 

 

SSEP, CSF CK-BB & awakening after cardiac arrest

(Sherman et al.  Neurology 2000; 54(4):889-94)

awakening defined as following commands or comprehensible speech

CKBB>205 U/l at 48-72hrs sensitivity 69% specificity 100%
Bilateral absent N19 sensitivity 53% specificity 100%
Bilateral N70 >176 msec sensitivity 67% specificity 100%
CKBB, N70, N19 or combo sensitivity 78% specificity 100%