How to Argue with a Non-KJV Reader
So you have your booklets
and you've already studied "to shew thyself approved" (II Timothy 2:15).
What do you do now? This guide will take you through all the steps in
dealing with a heretical non-believer:
Step #1 - Introduce verse comparison literature.
Step #2 - Call into question the salvation of the person you are
talking to, and warn them about dangerous people in his family and church.
Step #3 - Raise your voice.
Step #4 - If you get no response, raise your voice higher, and
keep sending the person creepy-looking booklets, so they can understand
the danger they are in.
The Two Failsafe Arguments
The above steps will work in most cases. However, there are two
situations that might cause you trouble, for which we have developed what
we call the "failsafe arguments," which are as follows:
Special Situation #1 - In some instances, a person might
note that the Alexandrian Cult has no members and never meets, that the
differences between the KJV and New Versions are so slight that they don't
make a difference, or that NIV reading churches are not satanist. In this
case, you should use the Subtlety Argument. Simply counter
by saying, "Well that's just because the Devil is so subtle and
deceptive." In other words, it's such a good conspiracy that it can't be
proven.
Special Situation #2 - There might be other times in which
you start losing an argument. For example, the KJV-reading apostate might
use better logic than you are or show a better command of the facts. When
this happens, don't try to outmaneuver your opponent! Simply use
the "You Prideful Scholar" Argument. Claim that your
opponent is relying on his own knowledge instead of trusting God, and
accuse him of using intellectual tricks to confuse you.
By using the subtlety argument and flatly denying the validity of
academic scholarship, you will make your claims completely untestable,
and therefore impervious to scrutiny. You'll never lose an argument!
Return to the Main Page
|
