It’s nice to see one of the many new faces of
Conservatism basically take an action from within the liberal playbook and lump
one set of people together (atheists) with mass murderers of the 20th
Century (Hitler, Stalin, Mao) [See article W. W. J. K. Who Would Jesus Kill,
March 10th, 2004]. Funny
how on September 13th, 2001 at the end of her article she states, “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert
them to Christianity.” And
that’s from the token Conservative Fem whose face is plastered over pictures
of the Constitution. So, she’s
advocating becoming just like the Taliban and al Qaeda?
It sure seems it. Is this
what’s at the top of the neo-Conservative trash heap these days?
My they sure are getting desperate to spread their ultra-right agenda
with an Ayn Rand wannabe and that’s probably offensive to Ayn Rand,
considering she was more intelligent and had her own ideas. Now Ms. Coulter, she spews the same venomous rhetoric that
her comrades spew. Not a single
original thought. Is this woman
that stupid that she can’t for the life of her articulate her own thoughts and
ideas?
Now according to
her, or more appropriately her keepers, say that anyone who was against the war
are traitorous. Well now, I guess that means Teddy Roosevelt was a traitorous
bastard. Poor guy, didn’t he know
you MUST follow lockstep with your President despite that you feel he may be
wrong? And that he has no
obligation to listen to the people? Liberals
are by far no more traitorous than the Cons.
If Liberals are indeed traitors then so are the Cons.
Once she realizes that maybe there’ll be some hope for her, but I doubt
it. There has been no word from her
or her comrades about Dubya using haunting images of 9/11 in his ads.
Had this been a Liberal no doubt that the GOP Storm troopers would be
trying to get them pulled and the Lib candidate punished.
You would hear the howling of Rush Limbaugh and Sean. Hannity griping
from how they’re using it for political gain to how disgusting it is.
Since it’s one of their boys, it’s ok.
Even Bill O’Reilly, the so-called Independent that walks the Con line,
has no problems with it, but surely if it were a Liberal who did this he would
be self-righteous about it saying the same things his cohorts have already said.
Now lets examine a
quote from September 17th, 2003 from her article Here’s A Traitor,
“Allende was an avowed
Marxist, who, like Clinton, got into office on a plurality vote.” Interesting, but unlike Bush they weren’t chosen by the
Supreme Court because of an absolute screw up with ballots caused so much
mayhem. Why is it that Cons both
neglect the fact that this whole mess took place in a state (out of ALL 50
states) that was governed by Jeb Bush, Dubyas brother and that the Supreme Court
then chose Dubya? No Con has tried
to even neither explain that nor investigate it, but yet they’re supposedly
the most ardent followers of the Constitution.
It doesn’t take a real genius to figure out that they don’t care a
lot about the Constitution, but about their hold on power.
Which I’m sure can be said about all politicians from both sides.