pol.health (6.6.27)

the politics of health care

. a new study finds that 
fat-wallets-are-normal doctors who think they are god
( and servants of the pharmaceutical kickback )
are the leading cause of preventable deaths in america
-- www.mercola.com
 ( a medical doctor specializing in osteopathy, and preventive lifestyling )

. real health care is prevention 
-- using science --
which begins by assuming we're both wrong,
and being open to debate,
to continuously test our beliefs 

...
. the problem with this approach,
is that we may not be at liberty to 
talk about the real problem;

for example, 

psychiatric patients who are "(helped) with atypical anti-psychotic drugs
may prefer to conceal their medical profile,
but without knowing that, you would not know why 
the Atkins laughably-easy diet is not an option;
only real sweaty discipline would work in this case .

BTW
patients who tend toward obesity on psychiatric drugs
 are doomed to hyper.insulin.emia,
-- and clogged arteries --
unless they are also put on an ultra-low calorie zone diet .

. I feel like there is surrealistic justice in a universe 
where a god is puppet-master over us all
because look what the god has directed:

. it was a typical modern promoter of 
the fat-is-normal diet,
who also 
will likely get osteoporosis 
because they insisted on a normal-calorie, normal-glycemic index diet 
that resulted in high insulin levels
 -- because of [/]abnormal stress or the use of "(normal) processed foods

and who also 
will likely die of calcium-clogged arteries 
because 
they insisted on throwing calcium supp.s at a
 high-insulin, low-magnesium problem

( but it was doctor-recommended !
-- and so was the skyrocketing escalation of america's insurance premiums )]

the politics of religion (6.6.27)

a constitution for protecting children
--rather than business interests

. I redesigned the constitution to protect the rights of both civilians,
states, and children as well !

. some laws that give special status to the spouse 
have been arranged under the assumption that the norm will be that 
the married parents decide one or the other will stay home 
to take care of the children, 
and thereby declaring a dependency on the other parent;

. it is this dependency that the marriage laws seek to accommodate

. the federal constitution should have a negotiable part 
that a state`s constitution may override only if 
that state`s legislature obtains a supermajority to do so

. the federal`s negotiable part should include this:

. this nation has had a long tradition of bible-based religion;
 however,
law is about what can be believed by all of us,
which naturally implies 
that if this constitution is to reach a concensus with every religion, 
it can be based on the bible only in so far as it 
rationalistically interprets the bible as being 
concerned with our collective welfare into the indefinite future
(rather than some bizarre notion of an afterlife 
-- it should be noted that the christian intention of that belief
has simply been to attract every conceivable superstition under one tent,
-- a noble if not impossible undertaking )

. we recognize that the bible's law was primarily concerned with 
prevention of infectious diseases; 
any sexual activity that results in the transmission of a disease 
will not be tolerated except where a group makes a pledge of marriage
such that the disease they are willing to live with 
does not spread outside the group 
. marriage is defined as a group's pledge to limit unsafe sex; 
it can be extended by adding members to the marriage,
 but it cannot be terminated by divorce: 

. unsafe sex with someone outside the marriage 
automatically merges their marriage groups 
unless they are quarantined
( this inhibits newly-created, insidious diseases, the way hiv emerged; 
you can't test for what you don't know about yet; 
thus, there is no safe way to allow free "(marriage-hopping) .
)

. there are many reasons why a group would want to declare a dependency 
( esp'ly one that designates to each member a primary guardian); 
any legal language that gives special status to a spouse 
equivalently gives the same status to an individual`s primary guardian
. marriage is not a declaration of dependency; 
marriage and dependency are independent legal contracts

. we recognize that regardless of a marriage's sexual orientation,
a parenting group that is allowed to raise children in privacy 
is statistically bound to engage in behavior that the public will not condone, 
and being subject to the shame of secrecy, 
some of these misguided children will be psychologically damaged;
thus,
parenting pledges are always made with some public group, 
independent of (sexual) marriages and dependendencies

 . unlike marriages (which default to self)
 and dependencies (which default to one`s childhood guardian 
else the state`ombudsman),
 parenting requires a pledge to document which public group 
is playing an active role in each child`s development

. the chosen public group is the child`s primary guardian:

 they are responsible for ensuring 
that migrating parents transfer control to another documented public guardian

. every mother is required to obtain a national id card for each child,
 and to declare a public guardian group at that time 
( which defaults to the current state's Child Protective Services ); 
the national id card contains no information other than 
biometrics needed to authenticate the identification, 
in order to avoid fraud such as identity theft