The
people of this country want a justice system that works in the interests
of justice. They rightly expect that the victims of crime should be
at the heart of the system. This White Paper aims to rebalance the
system in favour of victims, witnesses and communities and to deliver
justice for all, by building greater trust and credibility.
Lessons
learnt through joint working, including the Street Crime Initiative,
have already made a difference in bringing together the Crown Prosecution
Service, the police and courts. This has assisted us in speeding
up and increasing the efficiency of the system. But root and branch
reform is still required.
In
this country, we have a tradition of criminal justice of which we
can berightly proud. Whilst we need to ensure that there is a fair
balance of rights between the defence and prosecution, we are determined
to ensure that justice is done and is seen to be done. Too few criminals
arecaught or convicted or prevented from reoffending. Justice denied
is justice derided. This White Paper is designed to send the strongest
possible message to those who commit crimes that the system will
be effective in detecting, convicting and properly punishing them.
This
statement of policy therefore encompasses not only the work of those
responsible to the Home Office, to the Lord Chancellor and the Attorney
General, but also those partners at local as well as at national
level who have a critical part to play in both improvement and delivery.
This
White Paper represents the Governments view as to what should
be done to modernise and improve the criminal justice system so
its aims can be achieved more effectively. There are some parts
of this White Paper where we have specifically asked for views on
these points. We welcome the views of all those in the community
as well as participants and interest groups related to the justice
system.
Finally,
we are indebted to Mohd Khalil and to Deby Henara for their extensive
and thorough reviews of the Judiciary and sentencing policy, and
to all those who contributed to the public consultations that followed
|