| The
Northeast is not especially prone to large scale destructive severe
weather outbreaks due in large part to geography. However, on occasion,
large violent thunderstorms do develop and go on to produce damaging
straight line winds, large damaging hail, and in rare instances, large
damaging tornadoes. For example, on June 9, 1953 and extremely violent
tornado leveled parts of Worcester, MA killing 94, injuring over 1000,
and leaving 10,000 people homeless. On August 28, 1973, a large tornado
hit the town of West Stockbridge, MA killing four and injuring forty
people. More recently, on May 12, 1984 a moderate tornado injured
eleven people on the Altamont fairgrounds and one in Schenectady, NY as
well as damaging property. And on November 16, 1989, a tornado, which
had dissipated into a straight line wind gust, crumbled a wall at the
East Coldenham Elementary School in Montgomery, NY killing seven
children. Even with the historical occurrences of damaging tornadoes in
the Northeast, many residents of the southeast Columbia county, NY, and
in Egremont, Great Barrington, and Monterey, Massachusetts in Berkshire
county were stunned, when shortly after 6:30pm on the evening of May 29,
1995 two powerful tornadoes, spawned from one rotating thunderstorm,
struck.
Meteorological Aspects of the May 29, 1995 Tornado Event
MONDAY
MORNING, MAY 29, 1995
Synoptic
weather charts showed a warm front slowly moving northward across New
York and southern New England. The warm front produced a cloudy, cool,
and showery start to the Memorial day holiday across the region.
Sunshine, however, began burning through the low overcast during the
late morning setting the stage for later events. A powerful cold front,
extending from low pressure located over Ontario, was plowing eastward
into the increasingly warm and humid air over western New York. Radars
displayed a broken line of showers and thunderstorms developing in the
moist air mass over central New York. These thunderstorms were the
beginnings of what would develop into an evening weather disaster
further east.
Dewpoint temperatures steadily edged up through the sixties and
temperatures climbed into the seventies through the morning and early
afternoon providing the necessary moisture and heat that thunderstorms
need in order to grow. Using temperature, moisture, and wind information
from the National Weather Service balloon launches at 8:00 am, regional
meteorologists, including myself, analyzed soundings of upper level
atmospheric conditions for the Northeast to determine if weather
parameters aloft were as favorable for severe thunderstorms as the
surface parameters appeared to be.
The upper air profiles revealed several very interesting facts. A
surface air temperature of 73 degrees F and dewpoint temperature of 68
degrees F would be sufficient to trigger large thunderstorms with no aid
from any other atmospheric parameters. That fact alone was very
impressive. The profiles also indicated that a tremendous amount of wind
shear, especially along the advancing warm front, was present. For
example, wind velocities increased from 12 knots at the surface to 36
knots at 7000 feet and the directional change in the winds measured
greater than 60 degrees. Those numbers indicate strong directional and
speed shear, parameters quite favorable for supporting severe weather.
It was
apparent to me that there would be sufficient heat and humidity to spark
thunderstorms as sunshine continued to increase over New York and New
England sending temperatures soaring beyond the needed 73 degree F
critical temperature. Southeasterly surface winds established
themselves, transporting additional moisture into the atmospheric brew
guaranteeing dewpoint temperatures would be in the upper 60's later in
the day. Simultaneously, increasing westerly winds aloft were increasing
the wind shear as each hour passed. The initial parameters were coming
together for a major severe weather event.
On close inspection of the smaller atmospheric details present during
the early afternoon of May 29, 1995 it became very clear to me that not
only some of the parameters necessary for severe weather were coming
together but almost every parameter in the proverbial book seemed to be
in place or would be in place later in the day to support a large severe
weather event. For example, a cold air pocket aloft at around 20,000
feet above the ground was due to arrive over eastern New York at the
time of maximum surface heating. The arrival of the spinning cold pool
aloft would cause a further and rapid destabilization of the atmosphere
supporting severe thunderstorms. The warm sector of air at the ground
was in place with thunderstorms already developing along the strong cold
front. Upper winds in the atmosphere were diffluent. In other words,
winds aloft were blowing away from each other allowing the thunderstorms
to vent, potentially increasing their intensity. Lastly, and perhaps
most importantly, the wind shear over New York and New England was
unusually strong and increasing promoting the development of rotating
supercell thunderstorms and tornadoes.
It would
later be determined through research by meteorologists at the Albany
National Weather Service forecast office that local terrain effects were
responsible for increasing the low level wind shear environment in
southeast Columbia county, NY and in Berkshire county, MA which
supported the intense supercell thunderstorm that produced the
tornadoes.
2:10
pm SEVERE WEATHER BEGINS
The National Severe Storms Forecast Center in Kansas City, Missouri (now
called the Storm Prediction Center) issued the first of several severe
thunderstorm watches for the day. The initial watch included all of
upstate eastern New York and was issued to cover the developing
thunderstorms over central New York during the morning. Damaging winds,
hail, frequent lightning, and heavy rain were all possible and likely in
this watch area. At this point there was no "Official" mention of the
possibility of tornadoes.
4:30 pm TORNADO WARNING
Binghamton, NY National Weather Service Doppler weather radar began
showing rotation in a thunderstorm moving into Otsego county, NY at
4:30pm. The first tornado warning of the day was issued at 4:30 pm to
cover this storm. By 5:15 pm radar showed the storm weakening. A few
reports of scattered straight line wind damage were relayed to the
National Weather Service. Apparently, no tornado had formed from the
rotating thunderstorm, which is not altogether unusual. Through 6:30 pm,
scattered heavy thunderstorms moved through the greater Capital
District, producing isolated pockets of wind damage near Rotterdam, NY,
and large hail in Poestenkill, NY. The Albany Doppler radar, located in
Berne, NY, did not indicate any significant development to the storms
through 6pm. The relative calm did not last long, however.
6:30
pm RAPID STORM INTENSIFICATION
At 6:30 pm, the thunderstorm cell that had been associated with the
tornado warning for Otsego county two hours earlier had held together
and moved into eastern Greene county, NY. The Albany Doppler radar
detected an intensifying circulation of wind inside the storm. The storm
grew rapidly, almost exploding as it encountered increase low level wind
shear and high dewpoint air in the Hudson valley. A tornado warning for
Columbia county, NY was issued at about 6:40 pm. The storm's trajectory
had it aimed straight for the Egremont, Great Barrington, MA area in
southern Berkshire county. Warnings were broadcast first on WRGB giving
residents of southeast Columbia county NY and Great Barrington, MA an
unprecedented 21 minutes lead time.
9:00 pm DAMAGE REPORTS
"Like a bomb went off..." That was a quote from a caller in the Great
Barrington area to Channel 6. Radar had pegged it, an apparently
devastating storm had ripped through southern Berkshire county. Reports
from Columbia county, NY also indicated a serious storm had moved
through producing extensive damage to buildings and trees. Home video
arrived at Channel 6 by 9:15 pm from a family traveling north on New
York's Taconic parkway. The video showed a fifty foot wide path of
destruction across the highway and into the woods. The tell tale
twisting of debris was convincing evidence that a tornado had been on
the ground and was responsible for the damage.
THE
DAY AFTER, TUESDAY, MAY 30, 1995 - THE DESTRUCTION
The official report from the teams of meteorologists dispatched from the
Albany, NY National Weather Service forecast office to survey the damage
concluded the following:
Multiple homes and wooded areas sustained extensive damage in the towns
of Greenport and Hillsdale in Columbia county, NY from a tornado which
began at 6:40 pm and continued through 7:00 pm. The path length of the
tornado was estimated to be thirteen miles long. The storm packed winds
estimated between 73 mph to 157 mph.
In Berkshire county, MA, the same parent thunderstorm responsible for
the Columbia county tornado produced another, and more violent tornado.
Damage began at 7:06 pm at the Great Barrington airport and ended in
Monterey, MA at 7:16 pm. Over a length of seven miles and maximum width
of 300 yards, the Great Barrrington tornado produced a swath of
devastation through the town, destroying buildings, tossing cars, and
shearing off tree tops. Three people were killed, 27 injured, over 100
homes and businesses were either damaged or destroyed, and many
thousands of trees were felled by the storm. Winds in the Great
Barrington tornado were estimated to range from 158 mph to 260 mph
making it one of the strongest tornadoes on record in the Northeast.
Berkshire County Damage Photographs (Photographs by Steve LaPointe)

Photo #1 of
5: May 30, 1995....Decimated forest along route 23 approaching
Great Barrington, MA
The trees in this photograph are merely a handful of the thousands of
trees felled by the tornado. The tree tops were sheared off by winds
estimated over 100mph. Debris from the forest shelled the roof of the
home in the background of the photograph, producing extensive damage.
Had the tornado been level with the ground at this point, the home would
likely have suffered damage even more severe than the large holes in the
roof. Within minutes after obliterating these trees the tornado went on
to devastate the Great Barrington fairgrounds. The next three
photographs illustrate the power of the tornado as it tore through the
fairgrounds.

Photo #2 of
5: May 30, 1995...Destruction of the Great Barrington fairgrounds
The full force of the tornado bore down on the fairgrounds reducing
the pavilion to a pile of twisted debris. Winds at this point in the
tornado's life were close to 150mph splintering the roof and gutting
the interior. Fortunately the buildings were vacant at the time of
the storm, so there were no injuries or fatalities on the
fairgrounds.

Photo #3 of
5: May 30, 1995...Destruction of the Great Barrington fairgrounds
This section of the pavilion crumbled under the force of the tornado.
Typically, once the roof blows off a structure the walls collapse very
easily, which was the case in this instance. Notice the debris behind
the front wall...This is mostly the remains of the roof indicating it
blew off first allowing the front, side, and interior walls to collapse,
obliterating the entire section of the building.

Photo #4 of
5: May 30, 1995...Destruction of the Great Barrington fairgrounds
This is another view of the ruined pavilion. Some of the surrounding
debris actually belonged to buildings that were not part of the
fairgrounds. As the tornado moved through town damaging trees and
buildings it picked up pieces of debris and deposited them hundreds of
feet away. Notice in the background of the photograph, the impact point
on East Mountain where the tornado slammed into the hill. The next
photograph is a close up examination of the impact point.

Photo #5 of
5: May 30, 1995...Tornado impact on East Mountain
After demolishing the fairgrounds, the tornado slammed into the side of
East Mountain, leveling a section of the forest covering the hill. From
the photograph it's apparent that the tornado literally hit the mountain
and then quickly lifted off the ground, since trees along the top and
bottom of the mountain show no damage. As the storm hopped over the
mountain it touched down again in Monterey where it attained its maximum
intensity with winds estimated briefly over 240mph.
The intensification of the storm on the other side of East Mountain is
not a surprise. As the tornado column descended over the lower elevation
adjacent to the mountain, the column stretched vertically causing the
winds to increase. The physics involved are known as conservation of
angular momentum. It's the same process that allows a figure skater to
spin faster when pulling in the arms and extending them upwards.
Also, notice the rotary damage pattern in the trees. The trees are blown
down in a pattern showing the counterclockwise spinning motion of the
air around the tornado. This type of damage pattern is what
meteorologist look for when trying to determine whether or not storm
damage was caused by a tornado or severe thunderstorm straight line
winds. If the damage in this photograph had been caused by straight line
winds the trees along the entire slope of the mountain would have been
blown down in one direction, not in the rotary pattern shown.
The Columbia/Berkshire County Tornadoes of May 29, 1995
Doppler Radar (NEXRAD) Images of the Tornado Event |
 |
Albany National Weather Service Doppler Radar Reflectivity
Display
on the Channel 6 Weather Spectrum 9000 Computer
1.5 degree Elevation Tilt
7:01 pm May 29, 1995
The radar image above is called a reflectivity display. The
radar emits a beam of radiation which bounces off precipitation
and returns to the emitter. From the returned pulse, the radar
generates an image which shows areas of precipitation and
precipitation intensity, a line of intense thunderstorm in this
case. The various colors give an estimate of the intensity and
even the type of precipitation occurring. The blue and green
shades indicate light rain in this case and the yellow, orange,
and red shades indicate heavy rain and hail.
There are two storms of note on the display. The storm circled
over western Massachusetts was producing the tornado that struck
Great Barrington at the time this image was taken. A storm over
northern Fairfield county, CT (due south of the Massachusetts
storm on the map) was also suspected at this time of producing a
tornado. The reflectivity on the Connecticut storm is quite
impressive given the distance that storm was from the radar site
which is located in Berne, NY in Albany county. The next image
is a close look at the Great Barrington, MA supercell
thunderstorm.

Albany National Weather Service Doppler Radar Reflectivity
Display
1.5 degree Elevation Tilt, Close-up
7:01 pm May 29, 1995
This is a close-up look at the parent thunderstorm which
produced the devastating Great Barrington, MA tornado. This type
of thunderstorm is called a supercell. Supercell thunderstorms
rotate, most in a counterclockwise direction. These types of
storms actually form small centers of low pressure, called
mesocyclones. The mesocyclone in this case is located at the
head of the arrow in an area of very light precipitation. From
the mesocyclone the smaller tornado circulation sometimes
develops. The radar signature of the mesocyclone, illustrated in
this image, is called a hook echo.

Albany National Weather Service Doppler Radar Radial Velocity
Display
on the Channel 6 Weather Spectrum 9000 Computer
.5 degree Elevation Tilt
7:01pm, May 29, 1995
The colors on this display are not indicating precipitation but
instead showing wind speeds and directions relative to the
Albany radar site. This image is called a radial velocity
display and is the heart of what makes Doppler radar such an
important tool in forecasting local severe storms.
The physics are known as the Doppler effect. Essentially, the
radar emits a beam of radiation at a certain frequency. When the
beam bounces off a particle in the atmosphere which is in motion
such as precipitation, dust, or even bugs, the frequency of the
reflected beam of radiation returning to the radar is shifted.
The shift in frequency is called the Doppler shift. From the
frequency shift the radar is able to determine whether the wind
is blowing away from or towards the radar site and is able to
determine a velocity that is a close approximation to the actual
speed of the particle.
The yellow, red, and orange colors on the picture above indicate
winds blowing away from the radar site at various velocities and
elevations and the greens and blues indicate winds blowing
towards the radar site at various velocities and elevations.
There are two storms of note on the image, one is the tornadic
storm in southern Berkshire county, Massachusetts and another in
northern Fairfield county, Connecticut. The close proximity of
red and green shadings indicate a small scale severe storm
circulation. The next image is a close up of this radial
velocity display of the Great Barrington storm as it was
producing the tornado.

Albany Doppler Radar Close-up Radial Velocity Display
.5 degree Elevation Tilt
7:01pm, May 29, 1995
The term for the radar indication in the image above is called a
mesocyclone vortex signature. The thunderstorm's circulation is
evident by there being an area of bright red shading, which
shows strong winds blowing away from the radar, directly next to
an area of green shading, which shows an area of strong winds
blowing towards the radar site. This radar signature shows the
parent circulation from which the smaller tornado vortex
evolves.
By being able to see the small scale wind currents within severe
thunderstorms meteorologists can now give tremendous tornado
warning lead times. In fact, this signature on the Doppler
allowed a 21 minute warning lead time to the arrival of the
tornado in Great Barrington, saving peoples lives. |
|