Let's start with the most obvious - sex.

In the simplest terms: Women don't like sex

Not in the abstract, they don't. Women like the romanticized "idea" of sex. Thanks to the media/pop culture, sex has become joined at the hip with the concept of "love" when the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

Sorry ladies, but when a man is plowing you doggy style, he's not "making love to you."

This is why women will look at some sappy, slow, "love making" scene by a fireplace on some bear skin rug and refer to it as "hawt sex." If a man watches a scene like that, he remains limp. It isn't even remotely arousing to him. It goes against everything sex is actually about.

I'm convinced that women do not understand what a "sex drive" is. They don't GET what sex IS to a man, which is partly why they say some of the clueless things they do pertaining to sex and relationships and wondering how guys can be so "shallow."

I've seen COUNTLESS women ask the absurd question, "why do guys care about looks?" Are you INSANE? Do you know how male sexuality works? Do you not understand that we get erections through sexual arousal, which is almost entirely the result of attraction to one's physical appearance? Do you think we just make ourselves hard at WILL? Out of LOVE for your PERSONALITY...so we can MAKE LOVE to you and SHOW OUR LOVE for you?

Awwwww, how sweeeet...they're making looooooove.

Women don't get what "horny" means. They don't know what it's like to be so consumed with the need for sexual release that it becomes overwhelming and has the potential to make someone (a man, of course) go to drastic measures for that relief. On occasion, the drive can be so strong that it completes with a man's self control, and many men wind up losing the battle.

They don't truly understand that men go through the drive for sex just about every day, especially if they are exposed to attractive women. Men have a constant need to ejaculate...it's simple biology.

It's not even necessarily that men ENJOY sex...it's just that they CRAVE it. If they can't have sex, they will masturbate. A LOT. By "a lot," I mean, most men will masturbate at least once just about every day.

Women, on the other hand, don't even enjoy sex. They might enjoy "intimacy," or at least say they enjoy it and then complain about the guy for one reason or another later, but they would be just as happy never actually having sex.

Most women will never orgasm during intercourse. But nearly all of them sure FAKE it.

With men, on the other hand, the ratio is damn near 100%. The ones who don't will seek medical attention.

I'm not convinced any women actually orgasm during intercourse. Is what women refer to as an "orgasm" even an "orgasm?"

So for women, there is little incentive to have sex...and it's therefore hard to blame them for their lack of interest.

But that's just simple biology. It just goes unstated because people, both male and female, have deluded themselves into believing in the fraudulent concept of "romantic love," have deluded themselves into thinking men and women are the same except for their little sex parts and a couple of oh-so-minor differences in physical strength and the like, and men deluding themselves into thinking women enjoy sex because thinking otherwise makes for a cynical, lonely, miserable outlook on that aspect of life.

I have had one woman argue with me that men are "socially conditioned" to have a larger sex drive than women. This is, of course, utterly laughable, and just serves as the PERFECT example of a woman not grasping what a "sex drive" IS.

You can not "socially condition" a sex drive. That's as inane as claiming homosexuality is "learned." Sexuality is not learned, it's instinctive. Men are aroused by what men are aroused by. We see something that we find sexually desirable, the blood rushes to our penis, and it activates a part of our brain that craves an orgasm to relieve the excitement.

So while women like to pretend they know what sex is to a guy...they don't.

Shallowness

"Shallowness"...as it's defined by WOMEN, of course, apparently refers to judging a potential mate on one's physical appearance. It's laughable to criticize one for this, as I explained earlier, but it's also sickeningly hypocritical.

Women are just as "shallow" as men. They care about looks just as much, but not because of how it pertains to their sex drive (which they don't have). They care about looks because it is so important to them how they are perceived by others. They want to present an image to the public (mostly other women) that matches whatever fantasy they have concocted for themselves, and the guy needs to possess whatever physical traits match her fantasy boyfriend/husband. If the female thinks a guy will make her look bad to others (unless that is actually her fantasy...sticking it to the onlookers with a socially unaccepted image), she will not be seen with him.

Whereas men will generally just follow their penis and have an open relationship with any woman they find attractive, not caring what other guys think (unless the other guys are interested in her...then it becomes a fight), women won't be with a guy unless it achieves the desired result in how they want others to perceive them.

Women conjure up images and dreams and then do everything in their power to realize them, even if they're not actually enjoyable to them. So long as they're acting out the "idea," they will continue to follow through and tell others they are "living their dream" and pretend they are enjoying their lives. So if a woman conjures up an image of being a pretentious urban chick reading a book and drinking coffee at a local coffee shop, wearing an expensive coat she purchased at the mall and expensive perfume, and then being approached by a "cute" urban guy who dresses metrosexual, she will act on the urge to realize that fantasy.

She'll move to the city, buy the coat and perfume, take up reading (even if she doesn't enjoy it), go to a coffee shop every day and drink coffee (even if she doesn't like coffee), and keep hoping for a guy who fits that ideal to approach her. And if some guy approaches her who doesn't fit that ideal guy from the fantasy (even if he's "attractive"...but let's say this guy is instead "ruggedly handsome" and doesn't wear metrosexual attire), she will reject him...and then...pretend that the reason she rejected him was they have "nothing in common" (well, DUH...you're a chick, he's a dude) or she didn't like his "personality."

Which brings me to another point; the constant effort from women to mask their shallowness.

This manifests itself in two ways:

1. Transferring judgments of a guy's physical appearance to his personality. If some physically unattractive guy begins flirting with a woman, and she doesn't have some strange fantasy about rebelling against what she perceives to be "social expectations" by dating an "ugly" guy, she will reject him and then would justify it to anyone who asked by claiming it had something to do with his personality. Commonly, you will hear the girl tell her friends, "he was creepy." How common is THIS scenario?:

"He's staring at you." "Oh, he's creepy." (Translation: He's UGLY, but I don't want to appear shallow, so I'll just pretend to judge a guy I've never met by his personality, which I can ascertain is really bad from the fact that he has the NERVE to keep looking over at me).

2. They are disingenuous in how they rate a guy's looks. All one needs to do (and there has been actual research done on this as well) is look at hotornot.com and check the website's ratings figures for the different sexes.

The cumulative rating score (ex: 8.7, 9.5, 9.9) is based on where the person rates versus all other members of that person's sex. If a male or a female is an 8.7, that means they have a better cumulative score than 87% of all males or females on the website.

Now take a look at, for instance, a "male" 8.7, vs. a "female" 8.7. The 8.7 scoring male's ratings will demonstrate that most of the women (I suppose some men may have rated them as well, but unless they're gay, I suspect it's pretty rare for men to rate other men) have rated these men between a "3" and a "5." In other words, the vast majority of women claim they consider this guy mediocre to ugly, yet these mediocre-to-ugly ratings are still better than the scores for 87% of the men on the website. Think of the poor fellows who are a 7.3...or a 6.2.

Now, flip over to the women on the website. A "female" who with an 8.7 cumulative will have mostly 7's, 8's, and 9's. This means that the men who rated her actually acknowledged that she's attractive.

Are women being honest when they basically say that practically no guys are "hot?" In a sense, perhaps they are, as they have no sex drive...but the reality is, this is just another form of deceit from females to serve their purpose.

When a woman sees a guy who, if she were being honest, would be a "7" (if we were to take the honest MALE'S ranking of a female of identical attractiveness, hypothetically speaking), she will rate him a "3" or so. Then, she gets to make hilariously deceitful claims to make herself appear "deep and sophisticated." Things like, "When I met him at first, I thought he was ugly. BUT THEN I GOT TO KNOW HIM, and he became really attractive to me!" GEEEEeeee...how sweet. The guy with the obviously "gorgeous" smile who has a good physique and "dresses well" just suddenly became attractive to you after you got to know his wonderfulll personality (which involves doing keg stands at his local frat party and telling his "bros" he's getting a new BMW from his parents next semester).

Women can frame dating a perfectly attractive guy as if it's some sort of "charity case"...where she saw past his physical unattractiveness into the DEPTHS of his soul. How NOBLE of you.

"Yeah man, I'm gonna go play some xBox, dude." PERSONALITYYYYyyyyyy.

In these two ways, women perpetuate the myth that men are shallow pigs and women are such deep, sophisticated human beings.

When a male rejects a female (which is RARE, since men do nearly all of the actual pursuing), you know what he'll tell his friends? "Eh, she's ugly." All right there, out in the open. It's honest and at no point does the guy pretend that there's something wrong with her DEEP DOWN as a person, and that's why he rejected her. He doesn't have anything against her personally, he just doesn't want to have sex with her because he does not find her physically attractive. You'll never hear a male refer to an ugly female as "creepy" for flirting with him. The guy will find a way to remove himself from the situation and it would be understood WHY by any guys who had seen what she looks like. If a guy asked him, he'd just tell him that she's ugly. Or fat. Or whatever. End of story.

And at no point would the guy be upset that an ugly female flirted with him. It still boosts his ego. Men don't whine about women hitting on them taking "valuable time out of their day" and having to "beat women off with a stick." The concept is laughable, and goes back to the "men crave sex, women don't" reality I talked about before.

Now, guys WILL throw around the word "psycho," but this is usually reserved for ex's. Perhaps, at times, it's not justified, but having seen how so many women behave around ex's, I have to think there's often a good reason for that remark.

Still, even if there isn't, it has nothing to do with her physical appearance and everything to do with him just being tired of her because she pisses him off, for whatever reason.

And when men date the hot chick, they admit they're dating a HOT CHICK. They're quite proud of it.

There is actually a third way in which it manifests itself (hey, this is an ongoing epiphany): It goes a little something like this.

Morbidly obese female opens her mouth and says, "_I'M_ perfectly healthy. This is a perfectly healthy weight for a woman. But guys just want MODELS who are rail thin! They ignore women who aren't supermodels!!!"

This is the token line of an obese female...looking for sympathy, support, and in complete denial. It's like being an addict, I'd imagine.

The reality is, NO, that's utter BS. We don't rule out women who aren't supermodels. We are DESPERATE for sex, and any woman who is even remotely attractive to us will suffice. TRUST ME.

All we ask is that you aren't OBESE. Is that so much to ask? NO, it is NOT healthy. No male over the age of 10 is going to say, "I'm not fat, I'm just big-booooooned."

And the thing is, even obese women will have suitors. That's how desperate some males can get.

But women love to play the victim, so they rant and rave about how a HEALTHY woman should look like Roseanne in the 90's, and then the fact that women who are morbidly obese don't have many male suitors is a sign of male SHALLOWNESS.