What exactly was Judge Brock trying to cover up?: Read on to find out.
The plaintiff married an illegal alien for the express purpose circumventing an N.J. law that prevented her from leaving the state with her child of a previous marriage. The law was intended to protect the child's right to see her father (the plaintiff's first husband) who also lived in N.J.. The alien received access to our United States of America for his complicity. Although the plaintiff left this man right after she moved to Florida, she never divorced him and never had the marriage annulled. The plaintiff did try to start the process of annulment in Guatemala where she has wealthy family but never got past filing a certification of facts which is a preliminary step in getting an annulment. Trying to use this certification as proof of annulment is like using a marriage license as proof of a marriage. Still, Judge Brock accepted this document as proof of annulment over my objection and the case is now under appeal.
Perhaps at this point you might be thinking that forgetting to have your previous marriage dissolved before marrying again is just a small over site. But the plaintiff did something else that demonstrates she started the marriage with the end in mind and that she never intended to build a life together with me. She initiated our divorce proceedings in exactly the same way she did with her first husband; by making exactly the same charge in a false domestic violence complaint. The complaint she made was that her first husband and I threatened to kidnap our children. I was arrested, jailed and forbidden to see my son but thank God, I was able to produce and email from the plaintiff to her sister written only 12 hours before having me arrested. In the email she writes "I am going to hit him with charges so damn nasty that he is going to shit his pants". Well guess who the judge was that heard the case. You guessed it; the Honorable Kathryn A. Brock. Judge Brock dismissed the charges against me when she heard the plaintiff admit that the email was authentic she but never punished the plaintiff for making the false charges.
The plaintiff will never be punished for filing false domestic violence claims in two different divorces. She will never be punished for marrying an alien for the sole purpose of taking her first child out of state and away from her father. She will never be punished for taking vows with me while she was (and still is) legally married to this alien. She will never be punished for destroying my health and tricking me into turning over to her all my liquid assets in an attempt to save a marriage that she fully intended to destroy. And she will never be punished for lying under oath. Judge Brock knows all this and still she is suppressing evidence in order to carry out divorce on a false marriage that was never intended to last. Clearly, this judge is desperate to get big alimony and my children's trust fund for the plaintiff no matter what the law says or how it was intended to be used. Further more this judge has used every power at her disposal to try and break my will and get me to drop my claims.
Why does Judge Brock refuse to protect children and refuse to administrate the law? Why does she use her power to harm men and to protect women no matter what they have done? Because she has a personal agenda. There is very little information available about the behavior of judges. This is because people are afraid to come forward. A vicious judge can confiscate all your property, force you to pay more alimony and child support than you have, put you in jail if you can't pay, force you to pay your opponents legal fees, and prevent you from seeing your children. All of these things have been done to me.
Also when Judge Brock discovered that I was asking questions about her, she claimed that I was a physical threat to her and for a short time I was denied access to the courthouse and was unable to defend myself. Fortunately, I was given a quick and fair investigation by the Union County Sheriff's Department and by the New Jersey State Police Central Security Unit and I was allowed to resume my defense.
One time I was jailed for a period of 3 days for giving my child a toy. Fortunately, the matter came before another judge, The Hon. Frederick R. McDaniel, and I was released because it is not illegal to give toys to your children.