Newly Appointed District Court Judge Brad Menhiem of Dothan, Alabama and Judge Patricia Warner Denies Tompkins Discovery Request, while attempting to cover up Family Court Corruption In Montomgery, Alabama . Order Issued (12-15-100 code of Alabama) , Alabama Statuture , When the courts fail you, Never Give Up !.
Attorneys Debra Poole, Mitch McBeal, Tyler Coxs violates Judge Brad Menhiem order, relating to disclosure of Juveniile records to third party to discredit Tompkins.
1. Debra Poole Documents. 1, 2,
2. Drummond's admits that the Crook Warner is a liar, see documents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
3. Judge Brad Menhiem of Dothan Ala, Ignores 5th discovery request to cover up corruption. 1, 2,
4. Mitch McBeal, Knowlingly and willfully lies about the truth. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, if you need a good liar and crook in the family court system, Mitch is the guy to see if you want your case fixed.
Witnesses in the Tompkins custody cases have alleged murder threats, false allegations of child abuse and false allegation of threatening a State court Judge to bar him from his children.
(The Murder Petition, click on this link)
Access to juvenile witnesses granted: The admission into evidence of portions of a defendant’s testimony at a dependency hearing concerning the victim was not error. The Court of Criminal Appeals reasoned that the confidentiality rules which govern juvenile proceedings and records are designed to protect the juveniles in juvenile proceedings, not the privacy of witnesses. See Bombailey v. State, 580 So. 2d 41 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990).
Access granted: A television station’s news report about a 15-year-old runaway whose puppy had been stolen and tortured did not constitute an invasion of privacy. The court found that the public had a legitimate interest in the story. J.C. and C.C. v. WALA-TV, Inc, 675 So. 2d 360 (Ala. 1996).
Alabama state court overturned the conviction of two newscasters for violating a state law that prohibits disclosure of information in juvenile records. They had broadcast the name of a juvenile charged with murder. Although the newspaper had obtained the name from a confidential source, the judge reversed the lower court's ruling because the juvenile's name had been revealed before the broadcast in a bond hearing.
The Alabama Supreme Court (1996) held that a television station's news report about a 15-year-old runaway whose puppy had been stolen and tortured did not constitute an invasion of privacy. The court found that the broadcast of the juvenile's identity and runaway status did not constitute an invasion of privacy because the public had a legitimate interest in the story. See State v. Ozbirn, cc-930148, Dist. Franklin City., Ala., dismissed, Feb. 3, 1994) and J.C. and C.C. v. WALA-TV, Inc., 675 So.2d 360 (Ala. 1996).
FREE SPEECH AND WEBSITES :
SEE the following links as the law relates to alleged criminal defendants:
Links No. 1 http://www.lawyersweeklyusa.com/archives/pdf/usa/04/carmichael9928750.pdf