Some
games - like a few of the classics - that I have posted on my website have
generated a great deal of e-mail.
(I now average around 20-to-35 e-mails ... EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!)
One game, (Pillsbury-Lasker, CS1904); has generated so much e-mail that I have lost track of just how many people have written about this game. I used to have a text file with around 70-80 e-mails that I have saved as concerns this one game. (It became corrupted and I had to delete it - when I had my big computer failure ... and change~over in May, 2004.)
I worked quite a bit of time preparing some games ... in fact, some files and analysis are the result of many YEARS of work!
This
is why it bothers me so much when someone accuses me of poor preparation, or says
I have not done my homework.
(This
includes one former editor of 'Chess Life' magazine, and one
{former} USCF Policy Board member!!!)
Below
is something one friend sent me. It hit the nail .... RIGHT ON THE HEAD!! So I
decided to reproduce it here.
(I think he originally wrote this for the bulletin board on Chess Cafe's web site.)
MESSAGE
TEXT:
|
So where does all this ... ... ... "stuff" come from? {See just below.}
(Many
normally reliable writers and chess historians have all ascribed to the
idea that Pillsbury's
great {and long} "eight year wait," was a lie, a
myth, or even a complete hoax.)
"The
Book of Chess Lists, Second
Edition,"
|
So now we know where the idea of the myth comes from ... and GM Andy Soltis is not the only one, I am fairly certain that Edward Winter has also endorsed this theory as well. (And there are many more parties ... to this particular crime.)
So ... if I have to choose between a source ... who is hypothesizing, (many, many years later!) ... and between a writer who was there when the event actually occurred; I will take the eye-witness account ... EVERY SINGLE TIME!!!!!
******************************************************************
Further, I have done VERY EXTENSIVE research on the life of Pillsbury. I own virtually every book ever printed on his life. (At one time, I was considering doing a book on this player - but I never found a publisher for this project.) I have done detailed reading on sources that come from "The White Collection," in Cleveland Ohio. I have had friends send me many documents from the Library of Congress, in Washington, D.C. I have received copies of letters, books, and magazine articles from literally all over the world. I also used to have a {nearly} complete copy of Pillsbury's medical records. And I own one of the biggest personal libraries in the South. So what I am about to say can hardly be considered conjecture or hearsay!
I
think Pillsbury was an optimist. (He told his doctor that - at least,
initially - he did not believe the diagnosis.
Later he told the same doctor that he believed he would eventually
overcome the disease - that took his life.)
He
told many people - including Hermann Helms - that he would one day play a
match with Lasker ...
for the "World's Championship," and I am sure that he
believed that he would win it. He obviously was
saving MANY opening ideas for just such a meeting.
He
analyzed MANY of his opening ideas with different American chess players.
This was not a wide
group, but I believe it included Hodges, Napier, and maybe even
Marshall. (And maybe Helms as well.)
(He also analyzed ideas with
many of the players from Boston, {Barry?}
... where Pillsbury spent most of his life.)
Soltis even admits that Pillsbury analyzed this variation ... to the point of OBSESSION! {sic}
As
for why he did not use his opening idea immediately, this is VERY
easily explained. At first, he may
not have felt it was sufficiently ready. Later, he may have passed up
an opportunity to play it, because
it was being saved for a possible World Championship Match. (With Dr.
Em. Lasker, of course!)
When
CS1904 finally rolled around, perhaps Pillsbury had finally realized the
truth. Either he knew he
was very ill, and he might not have many more chances ... or he even
realized that he could be dying.
Whatever the reason - and only Pillsbury can say
for sure - we do KNOW two things about this game,
because they were reported in the newspapers of that day. #
1.) Pillsbury played the opening VERY
rapidly, (unlike many of his other games at this event). #
2.) That Em. Lasker immediately sank into
a deep thought, and that he fell further and further behind on the
clock as the game progressed.
We
also KNOW that CS1904 was NOT a good tournament for (THE
ILL) Pillsbury, and that he lost
quite a few games. We also KNOW that he scored a DEVASTATING TRIUMPH
over Dr. Lasker.
All the evidence seems to point to the fact that Pillsbury HAD prepared this line very deeply ... and that it resulted in one of his greatest and finest victories!
***************************************************************************************************************************************
---> Stay tuned for more interesting chess facts and news.
Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby, 2013. All rights reserved.
[ Home ] [ Annotated Games ] [ Odds-&-Ends ]
Page created: Wednesday; July 14th, 2004. This page was last updated on 01/04/13 .