Area 51 Scientist Dr. Dan Burisch
Page 62 Vol. 5 OR http://www.rense.com/general51/reply.htm
"So we have echoes of the Epic of Gilgamesh where the hero Gilgamesh set out on a quest for the secret of immortality, and got tantalizingly close to success before being robbed by a wily serpent." http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-12.htm Gilgamesh? Perhaps it is fitting for it was Gilgamesh that has been said laid the first stone for the temple of Ishtar, a name from which the word "Easter" may be derived. This man is truly thinking, or at least writing from inspiration! Whilst I am not the offspring of a goddess (lol!), being 3/3 humbled-human, it is said that he may have seen the abyss. Indeed, poor Gilgamesh. This abyss resides in the statement above, involving a quest for the secrets, as the Fruit of the Tree of Life is such that would bestow immortality. Thus, the fruit is guarded from all human beings, by the Cherubim, to be bestowed only by Christ as a gift. In this case, though, the wily serpent is not conjured as the robber, but again (as was in Eden) as the tempter. It sets, within the darkest of human infatuations, as a swirling helix awaiting its two mates, through our empathy toward it. There it sets, being lost and awaiting its´ mating with the dualism of our present circumstance, begging for completion as the three columns of the Divine Sephiroth. Indeed, poor Gilgamesh, the wily serpent comes! As to the next statement:
"No mention of Pleiadians, Sirians, Andromedans, Arcturians, the Galactic Federation, etc., mentioned by numerous other researchers exploring theextraterrestrial presence( Surely, I cannot account for the agendas others. Again, all I can say is what I have seen, read, and heard. I have to admit that I found it a bit disconcerting that Dr. Salla, with his litany of impressive origins and destinations, may have left from the list (not having been briefed on any "membership statistics" for any Galactic Federation), those from Orion. Those, as I have been told, (may) continue the spiritual side of humanity. But to speak of such things, may engender further accusations: such as being "spiritual" in the time of "great aspirations" of those that would place themselves above the stars of heaven. Indeed I know that it would have been important for me to justify everyone´s agenda, but to do so would require that I lie to them. For as much as it would have made people feel better (as much as self satisfaction carries us through our lives), I have opted not to do that.
"Disclosure that is made with the Dan Burisch scenario at its core, is something that is so highly contrived, that it would amount to little more than two small steps forward followed quickly by one large step back. At the end, we wouldn´t know if we were better off or not. After five decades of secrecy over the extraterrestrial presence, humanity deserves a more honest reckoning of what has been happening behind the scenes with the extraterrestrial presence, and an unambiguous step forward into a post-disclosure world."
Do I sense something? ;) The term "contrived" gives this away. The block above would necessarily posit knowing the truth (if linked to the first and second sentences of it), for without that, the statement "more honest" should not have been uttered. But, I do agree, in part. One group is, in fact, attempting to mold the future of humanity, for evil purposes. I fear that is not what he meant though. Rather, I hear, "Disclosure that is made with everyone´s (including Dr. Michael Salla´s) scenario at its core, is something so important that it would amount to a giant step forward." Be careful though, as someone in that group may just be a Jedi and offer the Galactic Rights of the Wookie to the fore! Unfortunately, not everyone is right, as others may well argue of me. The democracy of the human does not instill the truth. I am not saying that there are no aliens, and positing just the extraterrestrials of an uncertain future. The size and complexity of our beautiful universe would strongly argue fortheir existence, only that my work has not involved them. The "Tau-9 Conference for the Preservation of Humanity" is an event, for humans (not aliens), where our own dirty laundry, created by our unwashed hands, will be sorted out. It's okay, Bill. If you have to placate them, do it. You will see them relax and enjoy themselves and their philosophy. I have been working as hard as my body and spirit will allow, for them too, even so that they may enjoy themselves with their musings. It´s not just for the people that would agree with what has been said.
Can you really imagine the governments that are "in the know" telling the world the truth? What does that mean, telling the world? Everyone? Hand it to the United Nations? Does it mean getting everyone´s input or acquiescence, or just those that have struggled within the community of UFO researchers, or those members of the Cult of Great Men? Further, could one speculate as to how, given the time line we have, humanity (as a whole) could come to a decision? What rubric would one set to meet, how would one mediate to equanimity, what process would give way to total equality? Look at our world. Bear witness to our own history, present conditions, and to the structures and strictures we have built around ourselves, ostensibly for self protection, on both personal and global scales. Ought we to have everyone suspend their (let´s say) religious convictions, in order that they may deal with the issues? If not, how? We have 8 years for a solution to be found. This solution, in toto, will not cure the ills of humanity, but it will, with the help of God, put a band-aid over some of its errors. Sadly, as much as I believe in the involvement of everyone in the destiny of humanity (and I really do) by the time the debating would end, it would be too late. Sometimes reality dictates that some must simply stand up and act. They (as I) are available for judgment afterwards. We´ll see, on the morning of December 22, 2012. I hope to watch the Sun rise and know that all the work, of those now toiling, is being greeted with laughter by those that have always "known better." That is enough for me and all I ask in return for my small part: to know.
Do I believe that people should be told? However possible, sure. I think they should be told everyone´s perspective, even those of poor insiders, that struggle daily, while trying to help. It is not truth that I hear and read most of the time, but fear. With truth, we always step forward, sometimes painfully, but yet ever forward. We should listen to everyone, and debate credence from their statements. While we should act with caution, we should not be afraid to step forward, for fear of the boogeyman waiting in dark places. Such fear of the boogeyman does not serve humanity, but is simply another excuse not to act, to keep ourselves where we are, comfortable in our positions of self-grandeur. We know who that serves. We should not lose sight of the truth and the struggle for it, not even by means of the hatred for government, no matter how much it has lied to us - and it has.
I have appreciated reading Dr. Salla's words, wish him all the blessings from God, and ever look toward to having the opportunity to chat with you in person again. You may communicate this letter to whomever you wish. I do wish for freedom, and even as my bus pulls toward its destination, I hope for it. I feel a little work left in me. May God grant this world peace and love.
Truly,
Dan"
From: "Dr Michael Salla" Date: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:54 pm
Subject: Letter to Dr Dan Burisch Page 62 Vol5
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/26
Tuesday, April 13, 2004
Dear Dr Burisch,
Thank you for kind response to my short article [attached below] and
I´m glad that you enjoyed the Gilgamesh metaphor for the unique
situation in which Providence has placed you.
As you know, what
sparked the quest for immortality by Gilgamesh was the death of his
good friend Enkiddu. Enkiddu was the only individual of King
Gilgamesh´s contemporaries that matched the King in strength and
manly virtue, and in their mutual friendship Gilgamesh had found
something that went beyond the superficial loyalty and fealty of his
subjects, and had found a `true friend in the sense of what the
Greeks called `philia or brotherly love.
With the death of Enkiddu,
Gilgamesh set off on his quest for immortality so that he and others
would never again have to experience the loss of a `true friend´.
So what we have in the Gilgamesh myth is a story of deep friendship,
of overcoming the frailties of human life, and even the mitigation
of human suffering. So we have here echoes of Prince Siddartha who
set off on his own noble quest to mitigate human suffering.
Dan (I hope you don´t mind me being informal here since I hope we
can continue to correspond) I wish to inquire about
your `friendship and experience with J-Rod where he performed a
kind of mind-meld with you where your mind was flooded with
information on the origins of life. No doubt this information has
played an important role in your subsequent research into the Ganesh
particle, and appears to be something that you highly value.
Perhaps, more significantly this information appears to be very
highly prized by the controllers within the institutions of the
Committee of the Majority/MJ 12 which puts you in this unique
position of perhaps being the catalyst for disclosure of the
extraterrestrial presence on our planet.
My question about your mind-
meld encounter simply is did J-Rod ask your permission? Did he
enquire as to whether you would accept the information he wished to
share with you? In that sense, was he being a `true friend´ in
passing on that information to you? I ask because I have observed a
distinct pattern in the way the J-Rods or `Grays as more commonly
known, interact with humans. The reports on the human and J-Rod
interactions are quite varied ranging from the most sublime of
spiritual experiences, to what many would consider to be
exploitative. Nevertheless, the one common thread in these
interactions is that the J-Rods simply don´t ask permission when
they initially interact with humanity. Permission or consent,
typically comes after the first interaction which is forced or a
result of compulsion upon an unwilling human subject.
Now you might inquire what´s the relevance of asking permission if
what is gained is mutually beneficial and uplifting, and isn´t the
result an important criterion for friendship rather than the process
of asking force? My response is asking permission is demonstrating a
respect for human free will, a recognition that the choices we make
are the ingredients of human maturity as a species, rather than the
end results of our human labors. By simply interacting with humans
where the J-Rods took unwilling human subjects into their ships,
downloaded their advanced information into humans, performed
their `biological improvements´, and a variety of other `mutually
beneficial´ projects, all typically done without first asking
permission, the J-Rods were demonstrating a remarkable absence of a
characteristic that is an important criterion for true friendship.
You may ask whether I´m setting a rather high standard for how
extraterrestrials might interact with humanity, and whether we
should just accept that mode of interaction chosen on by the J-Rods
for passing on their information which in the end is `mutually
beneficial´. I raise this issue since I do question whether the J-
Rods can be `true friends´ for humanity, and also wish to propose
that there are another extraterrestrial races that have demonstrably
shown a greater capacity of being the true friends of humanity.
You may not be aware that on February 20-21, 1954, President
Eisenhower met with a delegation of humanoid extraterrestrials
commonly described as `Nordics´ which I will hence use as a `general
description´ for those extraterrestrial races that physically appear
sufficiently like modern humans as to blend in without being
recognized. The evidence for the Eisenhower-Nordic meeting has been
quite sparse as might be imagined given the secrecy over all things
extraterrestrial, but when all this disparate information put
together it makes for a compelling case that such a meeting took
place. I have subsequently learned that the meeting was even filmed.
I've compiled the evidence that I could find into an article on my
website: http://exopolitics.org/Study-Paper-8.htm
A significant fact is that the meeting occurred eleven days before
the testing of the largest Hydrogen bomb ever by the US. The Bravo
Test took place on March 1, 1954 at Bikini Atoll, and had a 15
megaton yield. The meeting with the `Nordics did not go well since
they apparently asked that the U.S. end the testing of the hydrogen
bomb, yet offered no technological assistance in return, but
only `spiritual advise´, and believed that humanity had still not
reached sufficient moral maturity for the advanced technologies
the `Nordics´ possessed. It appears that the Nordics were not
interested in reaching an agreement with the Eisenhower
administration based on `mutual assistance´ agreement, since they
presumably were not motivated by what the national security agencies
had to offer. The Bravo Nuclear Test indicated that national
security officials, in particular those within the Committee of the
Majority, thought that they could get better terms from another
extraterrestrial race that would be more open to participating in an
agreement based on `mutual assistance´. The treaty you refer to you
in your reply –"Tau-9 Conference for the Preservation of Humanity"
was I believe one aspect of this process. Now in exchange for their
technological assistance, the J-Rod/Grays were given the right to
conduct a limited biological program based on a variety of
conditions that have subsequently been disputed by both sides in
terms of compliance and led to military conflicts according to a
number of whistleblowers such as Bob Lazar, Phillip Corso, Phil
Schneider, Bill Cooper, Michael Wolf, et al. You are in a better
position than I to comment on the accuracy of what has occurred and
the contents of the treaty, but I would like to offer some comments
about what I have observed from the nature of the interactions
between the `Nordics who first met with President Eisenhower and
the human contactees who have subsequently reported on the Nordics.
The contactee reports between the `Nordics and humans typically
follow a pattern that can be found in such classic cases as George
Adamski, Billy Meiers, Enrique Rincon and more recent cases such as
Jay Solomon. I have subsequently heard from others who choose to
remain anonymous about their contact experiences. Based on my
research I believe that there is an active military-intelligence
campaign to suppress information on these `contact´ cases, as
opposed to `abductions´ involving J-Rods which by and large are
allowed to be disseminated in UFO circles. This suppression of
contactee reports makes it difficult to gain a sufficiently large
sample of cases on which to draw firm conclusions. Nevertheless
there is enough information that points to the `Nordic
extraterrestrial´ contact experience having the following
characteristics for the contactee: 1. heightened interest in
extraterrestrials; 2. establishing telepathic communication
with `Nordics´; 3. physical meeting with Nordics; 4. subsequent
physical sightings of Nordic ships; 5. voluntarily going on board of
a extraterrestrial ship; and 6. Nordics give assistance to the
contactee to disseminate his/her experiences to a wider audience.
Now this appears to be a classic contact pattern and the thing which
strikes me as most significant in this process is that
the `contactee´ is asked for permission by the `Nordics´ when moving
through these various stages which is indicative of a high degree of
respect for human free will. I believe this is very significant and
indicates that the `Nordics display a key characteristic that
indicates that they are capable of being humanity´s `true friends
in the sense of philia or brotherly love. This of course contrasts
with my earlier comments about humanity and the compulsory nature of
the initial interaction with J-Rods, and leads me to your own rather
unique situation.
You are not doubt aware of the way in which information about your
experiences has been allowed to leak out to the general public, and
in the way in which you have been allowed to be interviewed by phone
and in person by individuals outside of the compartmentalized
network of black projects. This is quite unique and I have never
heard of any other case where this has occurred, and suggests that
you are indeed the subject of an `insider´ supported initiative to
disclose the extraterrestrial presence on terms that might be
considered to be favorable to the Committee of the Majority.
One can
read many motivations into this but what I see is that this as an
effort by the Committee to legitimate the historic decisions they
have taken to work with the J-Rods, and establish agreements based
on mutually beneficial projects.
I am very concerned that the result of a disclosure done in this way
will be to legitimate the `spin´ on human - extraterrestrial
interactions that puts the Committee of the Majority in a favorable
light. I suspect that the Committee does not intend to release
information on the failed diplomatic negotiations with the `Nordics´
involved in the 1954 Eisenhower meeting, or at the very least cast
this in the light of an obscure group of extraterrestrials not
willing to participate in mutually beneficial projects. This would
be most unfortunate since in my view, it is these extraterrestrials
that have shown they are most capable of being humanity´s true
friends, since they recognized that the fruit of any technology
agreements would not be beneficial to the human condition simply
because we were not yet morally mature enough to deal with this
technology. Subsequent history has show the truth of this since all
the technology achieved through interaction with the J-Rods/Grays
has been kept secret, and we still for instance consume fossil fuels
when there are alternative technologies that are secretly available.
Public disclosure is more than just revealing information on the
secret extraterrestrial presence on our planet, and of the `mutually
beneficial´ projects that have been embarked upon. Disclosure is a
rite of passage which marks an important milestone in human
maturation where we enter into the greater galactic community. If
the general public is given information about extraterrestrials that
is sanitized of any mention of the earlier meetings that occurred
with the Nordic extraterrestrials, or casts a negative light on them
for their refusal to participate in `mutually beneficial´ technology
programs, then that would be most unfortunate. What we would have
instead is a sanitized disclosure process based on a utilitarian
principle of `mutually beneficial´ projects, that resulted in much
abuse by the Committee of the Majority in terms of how the fruits of
these projects were dispersed. The J-Rods are complicit in this by
virtue of their participation in these agreements, even though it
was the decision of the Committee of the Majority not to distribute
these technologies. This might be simply viewed as the J-Rods
respecting the will of the leaders of the secret political
committees set up to interface with the public, yet the behavior of
the J-Rods in the abduction process suggests they are not champions
of human free will.
I hope that by sharing these ethical and exopolitical insights with
you, you may incorporate some of these into your efforts to promote
a more transparent disclosure process. It appears that you have been
chosen by the Committee of the Majority to play a significant role
in disclosure of the most important event in recent human history. I
hope that the fair mindedness and great integrity you have shown in
your responses both to me and to others, influences you in giving
some of the issues I have raised a fair hearing in what lies ahead.
I feel that Providence has placed you in a unique position and that
you have the necessary gifts to promote an outcome for the highest
good of all. I wish you well in your efforts.
In peace and friendship
Michael E. Salla, PhD
www.exopolitics.org
Anonymous C.
4/19/2004
2:13 pm EDT
Re: Dr. Burisch and His Enigma: Volume 6:) Page 19
From: "Dr Michael Salla" Date: Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:23 am
Subject: Further Communication from Dan Burisch
Warm Greetings,
I´ve had a further communication from Dr Dan Burisch
via his Assistant Director which has been kindly forwarded to me by
Bll Hamilton, Director of Skywatch International.
I had an interview
on the George Noory Show on April 15 in which Dr Burisch was invited
to appear and this invitation has been extended to him. I also
intend to reply to the following message so I hope we continue to
hear more from Dr Burisch, and that a public dialogue is maintained.
In peace,
Michael Salla, PhD
*********************
Dr. Salla,
I have been authorized to send you a response to your reply to Dr.
Dan Burisch. For now, Dr. Dan is being restricted as to what to
communicate so his Assistant Director has been kind enough to
attempt a reply on his behalf.
To: Dr. Michael Salla
From: Marcia McDowell, M.A. OpDir Proj Lotus (PD/SF)
Re: Follow-up comments to your letter to Dr. Dan BC Burisch
Dr. Salla,
Dr. Dan Burisch has been made aware of your recent letter, and as
his ability to communicate with anyone outside our ´community´ has
been severely restricted due to recent events, I have been asked to
try to relay his thoughts, as well as the position of the research
team with respect to your well crafted and thoughtful letter.
True friendship appears to be a thread winding its way throughout
the body of your letter. And indeed, Dr. Burisch values true
friendship very greatly. It is a rare and treasured gift, to be
cherished as we wander through the difficulties of this world.
Perhaps, the number of true friends we acquire in this lifetime is
intentionally kept to a small number because of the fact that we
feel so moved by that relationship that we often suspend our own
best judgment in order to preserve and foster a deepening of that
bond.
However, in the case of Dr. Burisch, and indeed most of us involved
in this research, the raising of true friendship over best judgment
cannot be permitted, no matter how tempting it may be, since those
aspects of friendship such as mutually beneficial projects, good
manners, apparent respect and assistance can all be a ´glamour´
obscuring a hidden agenda.
Even if that hidden agenda appears to be full of virtue, such as the
mitigation of human suffering, it comes perilously close to reaching
out, or touching the Fruit of the Tree of Life; an action which
cannot be condoned by anyone on this project.
Comparing Dr. Burisch to Gilgamesh or Prince Siddartha who set off
upon the noble quest to mitigate human suffering, or to seek
immortality so that nobody would ever again have to experience the
pain of loss of a ´true friend´, is tantamount to a carefully
disguised maneuver to direct or guide his caring and humanity-loving
nature in a direction which appears on the surface to be worthy and
full of great virtue.
Actions (conversion of the observational nature of this project into
a technology of any form) even to alleviate human suffering, or the
pain of loss in such a manner would be tantamount to touching the
Fruit of the Tree of Life.
As to the question of whether the J-Rod asked permission before
flooding Dr. Burisch with mental images - Dr. Burisch regards this
as a personal matter between the J-Rod, himself and God.
And finally, disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence, regardless
of whether it concerns the factions of the J-Rods with which we have
become familiar, or other extraterrestrial entities which are
unknown to us at this time, it is Dr. Burisch´s position that such a
disclosure is not an issue over which he has any unique position
which might help to promote a particular outcome.
We in this project agree that we have been placed in a very unique
position: we have been chosen by the Majestic 12 to perform an
important task, albeit a humbly small task when considered in the
overall panorama of Terrestrial and Exopolitical agendae. But beyond
that, we have been chosen by The Creator, as evidenced by the
Spiritual Entities surrounding this Project that help to guide our
small steps. They always remind us to honor the admonition to ´look
but not touch´ the Fruit of the Tree of Life which we have been
given the honor to study. It is unwise therefore for any of us to
believe that Providence has placed us in a unique position whereby
we could help promote any particular outcome, since by so steering
or manipulating the observations, or our actions concerning those
observations, we might ignore the very founding Tenet upon which our
work has been sanctioned by the Creator of All Life.
While we are always moved to consider the ethical and moral
questions surrounding disclosure and our work on the Lotus, we will
not continence any maneuvering with regard to any aspect of our
observations, our actions, or our conclusions. This we do with
respect for the Creator of Life and in humility as human beings.
Sincerely,
NOTE: This not-for-profit site's creator, is not accountable for commercials.
Marcia A. McDowell, M.A.
Bill Hamilton
Executive Director
Skywatch International Inc.
www.skywatch-research.org
Fiat Lux et Veritas
~=~ RETURN TO FRONT PAGE ~=~
