Site hosted by Build your free website today!

College Writing 
Final Self-Evaluation

Assignment A: (80 pts total) Assess your growth and your performance for the fourth quarter.  Use the criteria spelled out for each area in the Scoring Guideline below and give yourself a grade for your journal, class participation, progress toward goals, and overall performance.  Be specific, citing examples that connect your performance with the criteria in the rubrics.  Use quotes or examples from your writing, conferences and class as examples.

Support your assessment clearly so it doesn't appear you are giving yourself the grade you want rather than the grade you deserve.  Be thorough.  Do not ignore less positive behaviors such as private conversations in class or missing journal entries.  Your honesty will make the rest of your assessment stronger.

Assignment B: Course Evaluation  (20 pts.)  Part I:  Look at the curriculum guide, the course description, the website and/or your notes from the beginning of the year.  What do you know now that you wish you'd known then?  What else should you have been told at the beginning of the course that would have helped you?  What was clear and useful about the introduction of the class?  What suggestion do you have for making the expectations and content of the class clearer for the students next semester? What suggestion would you make to next semester's students? Part II:  Write a short evaluation of the class.  Be sure to answer the following questions:  What was the best or most useful part of the class this quarter?  What was worst or least useful part of the class?  What suggestion(s) do you have for the course next  quarter or next semester?  Remember, this course is constantly evolving, for example you might pay special attention to the poetry activities which were spread out through the semester this year rather than in a single unit.  Your ideas will be used to improve the course.

Requirements:  Come to the exam period with at least a rough draft of your self-assessment.  If you type slowly begin typing before the exam day.  At the end of the period hand in your portfolio, your journal and your goals and any other evidence that will support your assessment.  I will check your assessment against them.

Suggested Process:  Select an area (i.e. Class Participation) and highlight the descriptions on the criteria sheet that fit your performance to determine a grade for that area.  In a journal entry assess all aspects of your performance using the scoring guidelines on the back of this page.  Repeat this process for each area.  Use your own midterm as a model for what to do again and what to do better this time.

Evaluation:  The final will be assessed in two ways.  First, if your self-assessment is effective you will get the grade you have given yourself.  Second, you will receive up to 20 points for the class evaluation and up to 20 points for each of the other four areas: journals, class participation, goals and overall grade.  The number of points you receive will depend on how thoroughly and clearly you connect you specific behavior to the specific criteria spelled in the rubrics.  Assess yourself for each of the behaviors spelled out on the Scoring Guideline below.

Senior Exams Due: June 12, 2007; Underclassmen Exams Due: June 19, 2007
Senior Early
Exams Due: June 8, 2007; Underclassmen Early Exams Due: June 13, 2007

Return to Home Page

Final Exam Scoring Guideline

Assignment A:

The Class Participation Assessment should accurately evaluate how often the student volunteers (3 pts), with examples (1 pt), how often and well he listens (2 pts), how often and well he helps others improve their writing (3 pts), with examples (1 pt), the degree to which he has private conversations (2 pts), the percentage of time he comes to class (don't forget about days tardy or absent) on time, prepared and ready to work (2 pts), growth or improvement in class participation (2 pts) with examples (1 pt.) and give an overall grade consistent with the descriptions in the Criteria for Class Participation Grades (3 pts).

The Progress Toward Goals Portfolio Assessment clearly states each of the five goals.  It should accurately evaluate each goal using significant, satisfactory, fair and very poor (1 pt each) with explanations that point to specific examples of progress in specific pieces of your writing from any course this quarter.  The explanations quote or summarize the applicable section and discuss the effectiveness of each in terms of the goal (1 pt each).  The assessment evaluates whether you have attached five pieces of writing that demonstrate the progress (2 pts). The overall progress toward goals grade is consistent with the descriptions in the Criteria for Progress Towards Goals Grades (3 pts).

The Journal Assessment should accurately evaluate overall organization - secure journal, dated entries etc. (2 pts), number of entries excluding those written in class (2 pts), length (2 pts), percentage of assignments completed, (2 pts) number and quality of extra entries that go beyond assigned entries with examples (2 pts) , entries that take risks, demonstrate thinking or persistence (2 pts) with examples (1 pt), growth or improvement in the journal with examples (2 pts), ability to meet deadlines for reading and handing in journals (1 pt), comments from a classmate and/or  from a conference with the writing assistantor (2 pts). Give a overall grade consistent with the descriptions in the Criteria for Journal Grades (3 pts).

The Overall Assessment should accurately list the individual assessments (class participation, progress toward goals & journal) listing the grades (6 pts).  It may evaluate the growth or improvement (4 pts) over the quarter or include any other pertinent information, mention future goals or contributions (4 pts).  This is the place to discuss any change or improvement that you have experienced in your writing.  The overall grade must follow logically from the individual assessment grades and the other pertinent information (6 pts).

Assignment B:

The Course Evaluation should offer an example of how the introduction of the class was well done or useful (3 pts), an example of a weakness in the introduction or a specific example of something you wish you had known (3 pts) and a suggestion for improving the curriculum guide and/or class introduction or a specific suggestion for a student next semester (4 pts).  It should evaluate the class stating the best or most useful part of the class, (3 pts), the worst or least useful part (3 pts) and a suggestion for next semester (4 pts).
Return to Home Page