
Media used for distraction? 2002 to 2003
Editor's note: April 28, 2002 This is the conclusion of a series. Part one: How the Left Caused the 9-11 Attacks. Part two: Left Eliminated Security Protections for Americans. Part three: .
WASHINGTON The breakdown in America’s security, dramatically revealed in the failures that led to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, did not happen overnight. It was decades in the making.
"Given the role of universities in shaping the ‘liberal’ culture,” writes David Horowitz, "the same powerful anti-American, anti-military, anti-CIA sentiments have prevailed in the left wing of the Democratic Party for thirty years.”
Exhibit A in Horowitz’s booklet "How the Left Undermined America’s Security” is the 27-year tenure of Rep. Ron Dellums, D-Calif., "the first sixties radical to penetrate the political mainstream,” who "was able with the encouragement and cooperation of his colleagues to establish himself as a power and player on both the Armed Services and Intelligence committees overseeing the nation’s security policy.”
David Horowitz, himself an ex-leftist who knows every one of their power plays, says the Berkeley congressman "was an ardent admirer of Fidel Castro’s Marxist dictatorship,” who had said, "My politics are to bring the walls down [in Washington].”
Communist Abetter From Berserkley
Dellums worked "hand-in-glove” with Soviet front groups, proposed scrapping all "offensive weapons,” opposed every U.S. effort to block the spread of communist rule, and in the 1980s "even turned over his congressional office to a Cuban intelligence agent organizing a network of ‘solidarity committees’ on U.S. campuses to support communist guerilla movements in Central America.”
When the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 jolted then-President Jimmy Carter away from his previous rhetoric about "an inordinate fear of communism,” Dellums denounced Carter’s White House as "evil.”
Said Dellums, "We should totally dismantle every intelligence agency in the country, piece by piece, nail by nail, and brick by brick.”
"With full approval of the Democratic Party leadership in Congress,” Dellums chaired a subcommittee that oversaw U.S. military installations worldwide, where he enjoyed a top security clearance.
Ultimately, when Rep. Les Aspin, D-Wis., became Bill Clinton’s first secretary of defense, Dellums succeeded him as chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. Thus, the Horowitz report notes, he became "the most important member of the House in overseeing all U.S. military defenses, controlling their purse strings, and acting as chief House advisor on military matters to the president himself.”
Communist Abetter From Michigan
In the 1980s when the U.S. was fighting a fierce Cold War battle in Central America, Horowitz reminds us, Democrats appointed Rep. George Crockett, D-Mich., to head the House Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs.
Crockett began his career "as a lawyer for the Communist Party in Detroit.” He was the only House member to refuse to sign a resolution condemning the Soviet Union for shooting down a commercial South Korean airliner, KAL 007, "and the only member to vote against a House resolution condemning the Soviet Union for denying medical aid to U.S. Major Arthur Nicholson after he had been shot in East Germany and the Communists denied him medical aid for 45 minutes while he bled to death.”
Dellums and Crockett were prominent in Democrat congressional affairs and, as Horowtiz writes, "probably the most extreme supporters of the Communists in the Democratic caucus.” But they had powerful allies "in their efforts to protect the Sandinista regime [in Nicaragua] and the Communist guerillas.” They were aided and abetted by "House leaders like David Bonior and Senators Patrick Leahy and Chris Dodd, among others.”
The Democrat party’s sharp turn to the left was reflected in the 1972 presidential candidacy of George McGovern. McGovern was a war hero who "had become traumatized by the killing he had witnessed and transformed into a kind of premature peacenik,” as Horowitz puts it. With his candidacy, the radical leftists became more comfortable with the Democrats.
They and their kind had been driven out of the party by Harry Truman in 1948. They found a home that year in the third-party candidacy of Henry Wallace. Though not a communist himself, Wallace’s so-called Progressive Party was "a creation of the Communist Party and under its political control,” writes Horowitz.
Finally, we get back to Clinton, whose flip attitude toward security led to the appointment of the likes of Hazel O’Leary as energy secretary, when vital security measures were scuttled at that agency responsible for America’s nuclear labs.
On Nov. 7, 2001, Clinton shifted fault for the Sept. 11 attacks to "those of us who come from European lineages” who he said "are not entirely blameless.” To buttress his comment, he went back to the Crusades of a thousand years ago.
Horowitz describes this as possibly "the most disgraceful utterance ever to pass the lips of a former American president.”
The party that in 1948 had made Henry Wallace an outcast had now ratified his blame-America-first rhetoric of 1948.

AMERICA is planning to open a new front in the war on terrorism by sending scores of special forces troops to the former Soviet republic of Georgia to help defeat guerrillas linked to al-Qa'eda.
A potentially significant breach between America and its new ally Russia developed as details of the operation were leaked, with Moscow outraged at the prospect of US instructors being deployed in the Caucasus mountains.
Pentagon officials sought to play down the operation's importance but acknowledged that it would mark a widening of the war.
"So long as there's al-Qa'eda anywhere we will help the host countries root them out and bring them to justice," said President Bush, adding that aid to Georgia was "mostly equipment and technical advice".
Between 45 and 200 troops are expected to be flown to Georgia in the next few weeks, and a number of Huey helicopters are already there. The Pentagon emphasised that the soldiers would perform a role similar to the 160 military advisers in the Philippines, rather than engaging in combat as in Afghanistan.
Mirian Kiknadze, a Georgian Defence Ministry spokesman, said: "It is possible that a group of experts may arrive to train our rapid reaction force, which is guarding strategic sites, particularly oil pipelines."
The deployment appalled Moscow, which regards former Soviet territory beyond Russia's borders as very much in its sphere of influence.
Last autumn President Putin gave his blessing to the use by the US military of bases in former Soviet republics in Central Asia but the unprecedented gesture has since left him highly vulnerable to criticism at home.
Igor Ivanov, the Russian foreign minister, warned that the arrival of American forces in Georgia would "further aggravate the situation in the region" and politicians from across the spectrum joined the outcry.
"Now we can see a picture that reminds us of the Cold War when the USSR was encircled by the bases of the US and its allies along almost the whole perimeter of its borders," said Alexei Arbatov, a liberal parliamentary deputy.
But Mr Ivanov also said the American decision vindicated Russia's view that Georgia had become a base for Chechen terrorists. The Pentagon and CIA believe that Arab members of al-Qa'eda have joined Chechen rebels to fight the Russians.
"We have a clear connection between Chechens and al-Qa'eda," a Pentagon official told the Washington Post. "They are potential targets of the global war on terrorism."
Georgia ruled out plans for a joint military operation with America to reassert control over the lawless Pankisi Gorge, close to the border with Chechnya, but Tbilisi officials have appealed for assistance in equipping its troops and intelligence.
"If other countries want to offer help, we would welcome it," Valerian Khaburdzania, the Georgian security minister, said this week.
Keen to increase its separation from Moscow since winning independence in 1991, in recent years Georgia has accepted substantial military aid from America.
A team of 40 American soldiers members visited Georgia recently to assess the capabilities of local troops and helicopters have already been supplied.
"There has been a transfer of unarmed Huey helicopters to assist that [Georgian] government with mobility for their own forces, for their own security," said Gen Peter Pace, vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The suspected presence of al-Qa'eda-linked terrorists in the Pankisi Gorge has been a source of tension between Georgia and Russia.
Last week President Shevardnadze of Georgia, a Soviet foreign minister during the Cold War, said he would consider a joint operation there with America but not Russia.
Syed Kaing Mabbul was a coconut farmer on the exquisitely beautiful island of Basilan in the southern Philippines, the hottest new target in President George W. Bush's global war on terrorism. His misfortune, his mother told us, is that he has the same name as a commander of the Abu Sayyaf, a bloodthirsty group of Islamic extremists financed by robbery, piracy, ransom and - in the past, at least - by Osama bin Laden.
About 150 Americans, the advance party of a force of about 650, are already in the southern Philippines for a six-month 'military' exercise that began formally last Thursday. Their task is to train Filipino soldiers how better to fight Abu Sayyaf, and to rescue kidnapped missionaries Martin and Gracia Burnham of Wichita, Kansas, who have been in captivity for eight months.
Syed fled the island last May, and has been living in a lean-to shack on the outskirts of Zamboanga City, on the island of Mindanao, about 15 miles north of Basilan across a turquoise sea.
Local Muslims took us to meet Syed's mother, Azirah Mabhul. She told us he had been betrayed to the army by seven fellow Muslims who had split a bounty of a million pesos (about £14,000).
'They picked up my son at 8am,' she told us. 'They brought him to Malagutay Brigade Camp, blindfolded him, beat him, stripped him, then hung him upside down for eight hours. They inserted ground-up chilli paste into his rectum to force him to confess to belonging to Abu Sayyaf.'
Azirah said that when she finally located her son, he still couldn't sit down. 'Mum,' he said, 'I just can't take the pain any more.'
In mid-December, Syed Kaing Mabbul was taken, with 79 other terrorist suspects, to a high security jail in the capital, Manila. He hasn't been heard from since.
It was impossible to confirm his story, but Muslim community leaders vouched for his innocence. His case is one of many accounts of harassment, indiscriminate arrest, disappearances, routine torture and killing now producing growing concern over 'gross and rampant human rights violations' against Muslim civilians.
Human rights leaders point the finger at the America's new ally in its global war, the Philippine armed forces. Since 11 September, they say, incidents of abuse have grown, and there is a palpable climate of fear.
'We are the ones who are living in terror,' said the imam of a mosque in a squalid Muslim ghetto on the edge of Zamboanga City. 'This war against terror is just the latest campaign in a 400-year crusade against Islam,' he said, echoing the convictions of the wider Islamic world.
Although the Philippines' five million Muslims comprise a minority in Asia's only Roman Catholic country, they no longer feel on the fringe of the global Islamic community.
Syed's case was just one 'among hundreds,' said Zenaida Sabaani-Lawi, director of Murid, a Muslim organisation which provides micro-finance to local women. 'There have been killings too. It's been getting worse since 11 September. It's as if they now have a license,' she said. 'This is state terror.'
Web Sites With Knowledge Of Yesterday And Tomorrow
IS YOUR LIFE IMPORTANT TO YOU?
Enter Here and get yourBiological and Nuclear Terrorist attack survival program kit
Communism - Not Islam-The Mafia's other Partners
The Plot To Surrender America To The UN
Osama bin Laden's Hit List for 2002 AD
Why are many suffering today? - Mind Control and Electronic surveillance?

Lets begin with some lighter facts in the world today. Then we will get into the big time facts, as well as a comp to this situation regarding Clinton further down in this web site.
Saudis Bankrolled al-Qaeda
Arnaud de BorchgraveWASHINGTON – A book released in France this week documents, chapter and verse, the "axis of evil," but it's not the one President Bush had in mind. It is the axis between Saudi Arabia's Wahhabi clergy and al-Qaeda.
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2002
Roland Jacquard runs the Paris-based Observatory of International Terrorism and is an adviser on terrorism to the U.N. Security Council. He has compiled devastatingly incriminating documents, correspondence and fatwas (religious edicts) found in the rubble of Osama bin Laden's Afghan offices and in al-Qaeda's terrorist training camps. The book is appropriately titled "The Secret Archives of al Qaida."
The U.S. intelligence community presumably has copies of these documents, and then some, but with the House of Saud in deep denial about its clergy aiding and abetting Islamist terrorists, the Bush administration does not wish to rock the already leaky boat of Saudi-U.S. relations. There is a Saudi religious dimension to al-Qaeda that official Washington and other Western capitals have decided to sidestep.
Jacquard's documents include fatwas issued by Saudi and other Gulf religious leaders, including the late firebrand Hamoud Shuaibi, who, according to the author, issued the first religious ruling condoning the World Trade Center bombing. Another fatwa by a Kuwaiti cleric approved suicide attacks as "the most noble rung a Muslim can attain."
'Crashing Your Plane Into an Important Location'
It also mentioned "crashing your plane into an important location that will cause your enemy to suffer colossal losses."
The book, first publicized by the International Herald Tribune earlier this week, also contains an "Encyclopedia of Jihad" on how to be an effective terrorist; how to set up "sleeper cells" in the West; how to put explosives in a hair brush, a stapler, a pack of cigarettes or a ballpoint pen; how to detonate a bomb with a rat in a cage that gnaws at a metal wire coated with blood or fat; and diagrams of construction methods of skyscrapers.
There is also a manuscript that mentions the suicide attack on the USS Cole in Aden in October 2000 by two men in a dinghy "that cost just $10,000." The $1 billion warship was disabled for almost a year, and the repair bill ran to $250 million. The WTC towers and Pentagon suicide attacks are estimated to have cost between $300,000 and $500,000, and the accumulated damage to the U.S. and world economies is thought to be almost $700 billion.
The House of Saud recently dispatched a phalanx of princes of the royal blood to America, where they fanned out in think tanks and television talk shows. They tried to convince their American interlocutors that they had not funded Islamist extremism in Pakistan or Afghanistan; that they have never encouraged extremism anywhere; that they had never given a penny to the Taliban regime, even though Saudi Arabia was one of only three countries (with Pakistan and the UAE) to recognize the Taliban regime ("they asked us, but we said no"); and that the only ticking time bomb in the region was the Bush administration's benign neglect, flavored with an Israeli bias, of the Palestinian-Israeli debacle.
As for Pakistan's thousands of religious schools that teach the virtues of "holy war" against Western infidels, the Saudi government has never given them any money. "Maybe private money," conceded Prince Turki al Faisal, who had run the Saudi intelligence service for 24 years until he suddenly and unexpectedly resigned two weeks before Sept. 11.
The House of Saud's accounting practices would make Enron and Arthur Andersen salivate with envy. They are a now-you-see-it-now-you-don't shell game that allowed King Fahd's youngest son to build himself a $350 million palace outside Riyadh. The deliberations of the unelected, king-appointed consultative body known as the Shura are as opaque as the budget it is not authorized to discuss.
Turki's non-denial denial was as close as the Saudi royal family will come to facing the ugly truth.
He also admitted that bin Laden still enjoys the support of an overwhelming majority of young Saudis. Sixty percent of Saudi Arabia's 18 million population is under 21. As a man who has been the kingdom's top intelligence honcho for a quarter of a century, Turki knows, but cannot admit, even off the record, that radical mullahs have been exporting Wahhabi extremism for years.
The Wahhabi clergy has been the beneficiary of the House of Saud's munificence since 1974, when oil prices suddenly tripled after the October 1973 war. The clergy received untallied billions of ryals to build mosques around the world and spread Wahhabi intolerance. In return for this royal largess, the clergy turned a blind eye to the extravagant excesses of the House of Saud, feathered its nest and consolidated its Muslim dominion abroad.
The only problem with this royal protection arrangement is that for the clergy, America is the enemy, and for the House of Saud, America is a close friend for 60 years and one that saved the kingdom from a fate worse than death when it intervened to turn back Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait.
The Pakistani madrassa network of 15,000 religious schools (7,500 are deemed important) was entirely funded by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. From there, gung-ho wannabe jihadis - John Walker Lindh was one of them - moved west into Afghanistan to join al-Qaeda. Pakistan was thus relieved of the burden of public education so it could spend more on its military budget.
Let us hope Jacquard's "Secret Archives of al Qaida" will persuade Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud, the kingdom's de facto ruler, to muster the will and courage to bring the radical clergy to heel - before radical Islam topples the House of Saud.
February 4, 2002
CIA Files: Defector Reveals Russia’s Secret Plan
In CIA Files: Defector Reveals Russia’s Secret War Plans, Col. Stanislav Lunev reveals the dark side of Russia’s soul -- and their continuing efforts to destroy America. The highest-ranking military spy ever to defect from Russia, Lunev warned the CIA and the FBI that Russia continues to actively plan for war with the U.S. and the West. They didn’t listen then, but they’re listening now.
Hear in his own words what Col. Lunev told the CIA and other national security agencies in a NewsMax exclusive interview.
Col. Stanislav Lunev makes James Bond look like the Hollywood character he is – because Lunev was Russia’s real-life James Bond.
In fact, he was the highest-ranking military spy ever to defect from Russia. He did so in 1992, after Boris Yeltsin came to power and after America and the West believed the old USSR had died.
Col. Lunev told, and continues to tell, America’s CIA, the FBI, DIA and other national security agencies that Russia still posed a real threat and that Russian military and spy officials were still talking, planning and preparing for war with the United States and the West. He revealed they continue to organize, support and sponsor terrorist groups world-wide. He alleged Russia uses organized crime groups to pursue their dangerous agenda.
Col. Lunev’s message went unheeded – until now.
In a stunning two-hour interview with Barry Farber, one of America’s most noted radio talk show hosts, Col. Lunev reveals some of the darkest secrets of Russia.
In CIA Files: Defector Reveals Russia’s Secret Plans, Lunev now shares some of the vital information he shared with his CIA debriefers – much of which has never been revealed publicly.
Here are just a few of the shockers you’ll hear:
Russia’s secret war plans for a nuclear Pearl Harbor attack Use of special operations forces to detonate suitcase nuclear bombs and poison our water supply.
Why Col. Lunev believes Russia has already positioned nuclear weapons on U.S. soil.
A new "earthquake bomb" that was accidentally tested, killing thousands.
Russian spies and sympathizers at the highest levels of the U.S. government and U.S. media outlets – you wouldn’t believe who has been helping the Russians! Old secrets: what every Russian spy learned about the assassination of President Kennedy.
Why Russian intelligence has targeted cultural institutions and are now even undermining our local banks.
Russia’s mafia – just another front for the Communist Party and the KGB. Russia's continued work to help terrorist nations like Iraq, Iran and others. Russia’s continued buildup of strategic weapons as America disarmed.
Russian Expert Who ‘Predicted’ Attacks Warns of New Ones
Dr. Tatyana Koryagina gained some credibility in the Russian media because of
her prediction of an unusual catastrophe that was about to hit the U.S.
She said it would take place on Aug. 19 and would collapse the U.S. economy.
Koryagina is a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to Russian Ministry of Economic Development (Minekonom). She is reportedly close to President Putin’s inner circle.
On July 12, 2001, Pravda published a Page One story on her predictions entitled "The Dollar and America Will Fall Down on August 19? -- That's the Opinion of Dr. Tatyana Koryagina, Who Very Accurately Predicted the August Default in 1998."
In her July interview, Koryagiuna told Pravda: "The U.S. has been chosen as the object of financial attack because the financial center of the planet is located there. The effect will be maximal. The strike waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet instantly, and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear bomb."
Late last month, Pravda re-interviewed Dr. Koryagina to get her take on the events of Sept. 11.
Koryagina made the following key points in an article entitled "Who Will Strike America in Its Back?":
New Strikes Will Come. In the near term, she said, "the powerful group" that masterminded the events of Sept. 11 will make new strikes against America –- of a financial nature and otherwise. She said they will "strike America in the back" and bring it down.
She noted that Americans are consolidating around their government and preparing retaliatory strikes against the "terrorists." However, Americans are trembling about spending. When they understand, after the upcoming new strikes, that their government can guarantee them nothing, they will panic -- causing a collapse of their financial system.
Didn’t Make Serious Mistake. About her forecast of July 12, Dr. Koryagina said, "I did not make a serious mistake. Indeed, between August15 and 20, the dollar started trembling under the pressure of multiple bad news about the U.S. and world economy. And within weeks, the Manhattan skyscrapers fell down. As a result, a significant part of the world financial network was paralyzed. This strike was aimed at destabilization and destruction of America and [in domino fashion] all the countries making countless billions of dollars."
The Powerful Group. Who is behind these strikes? Koryagina claims the U.S. is painting a false picture. She said the operation was not the work of 19 terrorists but a larger group seeking to reshape the world. She claimed a group of extremely powerful private persons, with total assets of about $300 trillion, intends to legalize its power and to become the new world government. The Sept. 11 strikes showed that this group is afraid of nothing -- human lives have zero value for them.
Koryagina again encouraged Russian citizens to cash out dollars.
The Koryagina claims are not easily dismissed, especially her clear indications in the interview before Sept. 11 that the attacks on America’s financial system would be of an unusual nature. Her comments also mirrored similar warnings issued by Russian officials.
Still, this story raises other questions. Did the Russian government know in advance and what was their involvement?
On Sept. 28 the Washington Times reported that "U.S. intelligence agencies have uncovered information that Russian criminal groups have been supplying Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorist network with components for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons."
Of course, the Russian mafia has very close ties with Russia’s intelligence agencies.
It is important to note that Russia is a significant backer of almost every state sponsor of terrorism, some with links to bin Laden’s group. These include Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea and Cuba.
Editor's note: Col. Stanislav Lunev, Russia's highest-anking military defector warns in "CIA Files" new details of Russia's links to terrorists and the nations that support them. To find out more -- CLICK HERE.
Dr. Nemets is a consultant to the American Foreign Policy Council (AFPC). An expert in Chinese-Russian strategic military alliance development, he has spent the last several years researching Chinese and Russian economic and military issues. Dr. Nemets worked from 1986-92 at the Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences. He immigrated to the United States in December 1994.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Dr. Alexandr Nemets
The same Russian government expert who predicted last July that America was about to suffer a "financial attack" –- and encouraged Russian citizens to cash out dollars and buy rubles and gold –- has again surfaced to make more stunning forecasts.
Thursday, Oct. 4, 2001
Russia
War on Terrorism
Why are we spending $Billions to fight this war on terror when we have already paid for the training of crack anti-terrorist troops over the years that aren't being used?
The U.S. military has distinguished itself in Afghanistan - that much is certain. We went into an area in which everyone in the world was singing the praises of the Afghani/Taliban soldier and his staying power (remember Iraq's Republican Guard?).
Common Opinion held that we would suffer the same fate the Soviet Union did (I guess they thought we would be fighting against ourselves, as the Soviets did). But, lo and behold, our military made quick, orderly, efficient work of removing the Taliban and disrupting Al Qaeda.
I seem to recall that this was declared by the President to be a "war against terror." I also seem to remember, somewhere in the deep dark recesses of my muddled mind, that our military has an anti-terrorist capability on which we spend millions annually. So the question in my mind is this: If we have dedicated anti-terrorist forces, why are we using non-classified Special Forces, Air Force and Marines to combat terrorism? Not that they can't do the job. They have done a beautiful job.
Without giving away any classified information, let me say that I am sure we have such an anti-terrorist capability. So after numerous terrorist attacks against the United States and our facilities overseas going as far back as the Reagan administration, where are our vaunted anti-terrorist teams? My fear: They are probably in their training cycles in their compounds. The training these teams go through is effective - the best there is. And they work jointly with Mossad, SAS, CIA, and so forth to track terrorism around the globe. The name of Osama bin Laden was used around these teams long before it became commonplace in the rest of the United States.
Yet these teams never seem to be called upon to do the deed. Oh sure, they gather intel. Sure, they profile. Sure, they track. Sometimes they even participate in missions of indeterminate nature and scope. Perhaps they were even in Afghanistan recently - who knows? Certainly not the taxpayers who employ them. Or the terrorists who are supposed to be "deterred" by them.
Despite the fact that we have built a rapid-deployment system that allows us to deploy these troops anywhere in the world incredibly rapidly, we apparently have failed to use them in a deterrent manner. Deterrence/MAD as a strategy worked on the entire Soviet Union - why wouldn't it work on terrorists?
Instead, we have been known to negotiate, barter, and stall. We flip million-dollar Tomahawk missiles at Al-Qaeda tents. But we don't deploy our bad boys and kill the perps. And we keep the very existence of our anti-terrorist teams classified. So no one knows what they are truly capable of.
Is it a lack of political will on the part of our lawmakers and administrations? In the case of specialized anti-terrorist SEAL teams, is it a lack of conviction on the part of Navy leaders to use that force as it was designed to be used? Have the diseases of Vietnam persisted to this day? Are we really so afraid of the world opinion that we can't use our military as it is designed to be used? Are we afraid to win? After recent events, I don't think the American public will object too much.
The United States needs to use its quick-reaction forces to the limit of their capability. They may even be in Afghanistan now, but is that why we spend what we do to train them? So they can be used as glorified infantry? To occupy ground? There are numerous U.S. military forces better suited for that job.
Our anti-terrorist teams are the shiny tip of the spear, able to go anywhere and execute the mission. They are intended to be the thunderbolt of lightning from the clear sky, that leaves nothing behind but scorched earth where a terrorist organization once stood.
We know most of the terrorist groups in the world, where they train, where they live, and who they are. Why not eliminate them, as President Bush has so eloquently and correctly called for? If we are going to be a world police force, we should be an effective one.
The doctrine of "hot pursuit" has been long recognized in international law. A state in hot pursuit of terrorists has the right to cross borders and bring perpetrators to justice. We do not need to be caught in a quagmire of posse comitatus or "acts of war." Let it be known that the United States will pursue any and all terrorist groups immediately and eliminate them. Then make it stick as a basic element of our foreign policy.
We have the backing of the entire world to an unprecedented degree (as long as it lasts). Let's use that support - publicly and effectively. All it takes is the political will to do so.
Contributing Editor Jon Barrett is the pen name of a Naval Reserve officer who has served in both the surface Navy and Naval Special Warfare. He can be reached at jbarrett@computermail.net.
To most Americans, and certainly to most American soldiers on duty in Europe, the new Euro currency and future military challenges have little or no connection.
While many of us slept away our New Year's Eve revels on Jan. 1, the new Euro took hold and became the common currency for 12 nations in Western Europe. With the 55th anniversary of the post-World War II Marshal Plan coming in a few months, this currency change will signal a new era in economic and political relations between Europe and the United States.
The Marshal Plan pulled Europe out of destruction and its post-war stagnation and ruin. More than a half-century later, the plan has resulted in the continent leveling the playing field with Uncle Sam and the almighty dollar!
Europe has become a conglomerate of nations where national sovereignty has taken second place to economic unity. European leaders envision that this will be in the best interest of their economy and the bottom line - the trading value of the Euro against the dollar. Slowly but surely this economic union is taking on the identity, and certainly the role, of a governing force.
Some observers say the Marshal Plan has come full circle. Others realize, quite perceptively, that the dollar is about to receive an unprecedented challenge *from the unified European market and its unifying currency.
The true long-term effect of adopting a single currency is the creation of a political union. Political unions are symbiotic of their protecting force, even if the force strays a bit. This newly emerging European federal state will ultimately have responsibility for a continent-wide foreign and security policy as well as for what are now domestic economic and social polices.
While each government, and various key political figures, differ in their reasons for wanting a political union, there is little doubt that the real rationale for the European Monetary Union is political, and not, as the masses believe, economic.
Great Britain's Tony Blair, America's staunchest European ally on the continent, is clearly illustrative of my assertion. Blair walks in both camps, or as some say, talks out both sides of his mouth. He vehemently backs every American move. Meanwhile, Great Britain has no plan to eliminate its national currency while certainly considering itself an integral part of The European Union.
The European Monetary Union was created by the ratification of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which called for a future political union. There is no credible, or sizable, country in the world that does not have its own national currency, which is generally considered a fundamental characteristic of national sovereignty. It is also the domestic key to independent financial management and budget policies in any country.
As time goes on, and the European Monetary Union evolves into a more general political union, conflicts will rise from incompatible expectations about the sharing of power. This is absolutely something that the world can bet on.
Without a doubt, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the erosion of Communism in Eastern Europe changed the basis and need for European foreign policy and military collaboration. The United States and Western Europe shared a close alliance for many years and continue to coordinate military undertakings within the NATO structure, primarily in the Balkans.
But many Europeans in positions of responsibility see their economic interests and foreign policy goals differing from those of the United States in many parts of the world, including Eastern Europe itself. Further, the French and German governments want to develop an independent military capability that can operate without U.S. participation or consent. Great Britain is also a strong advocate for European military autonomy, at least in words if not yet in deeds.
Last summer, the European Union announced tentative plans for the formation of a Euro Army, or Euro-Force. Notwithstanding, Great Britain jumped on the bandwagon pledging support and embracing the concept. However, this all seemed to lose steam given the global events of the past eight months. Continued tensions in Macedonia and Kosovo, coupled with the reactions caused by the September 11th terrorist attacks have muted many strong advocates for the rapid formulation of the Euro-Force.
Clearly the movement toward a political merger based on the European Monetary Union with the recent implementation of the Euro currency, will serve to accelerate the development of an independent European military structure. By design, this Euro-Army will be capable of force projection outside Western Europe and supposedly will focus on humanitarian crises. Still, only a fool would believe that this limited role and mission could not ultimately change.
It is my assessment that the attempt to forge a common military and a foreign policy for Europe could be an additional potential source of conflict - both among the member nations, as well as those outside of the group.
It is widely assumed that European countries still differ in their national ambitions. There is no doubt, however, that a Europe of nearly 300 million people with an economy approximately equal in size to that of the United States, could create a formidable military force.
One consequence of a politically unified Europe, with its own independent military and foreign policy, would be the accelerated reduction of the U.S. military presence in Europe. This, in turn could weaken the role of NATO, and perhaps make Europe more vulnerable to attack from outside.
But don't bet on a reduction of U.S. military forces in Europe in the short term. The current presence of American forces in Germany today is almost solely justified by the need to insulate Western Europe from the complicated problems of the Balkan countries. In that regard, NATO and American soldiers are providing security for both the implementation and the competitive value of the Euro currency.
Military leaders both in Europe and Washington prefer to have everyone, including American soldiers themselves, believe that the real reason that they are serving in the former Yugoslavia is to make the Balkans a comfy, warm, secure and thriving place to live. But I beg to differ.
Marshall Tito, even with his iron fist, could not achieve that lofty goal in forty years, so it is neither rash nor defeatist to predict NATO's ultimate failure in the Balkans. The ancillary reasons - big business, defense contracts, research and development, and making money hand over fist, also keep U.S. soldiers on the continent.
Simply put, the implications for the United States and American forces overseas, as well as for all Americans, are that we will sooner or later have to re-think our foreign policy with respect to Europe. All these years after the end of World War II, 55 years after the Marshal Plan, and now more than a decade after the end of the Cold War, this stumbling former punch-drunk continent has risen to a formidable status.
I predict, not as an economist, but as a soldier, that a politically unified Europe will seek a different relationship with the United States. France will be a primary mover behind these changes and in so doing will again turn against us in a way reminiscent of former President Charles de Gaulle, who in the mid-1960s banned the U.S. military from French soil and left NATO in frustration over American interference with French policies toward countries such as Libya, Iraq, Iran and Vietnam.
The United States must recognize that it will no longer be able to count on Europe as an ally in all its relations with third countries. The Europeans, guided by a combination of economic self-interest, historical traditions and national pride, will seek alliances and pursue policies that will likely be contrary to the interests of the United States.
Mutual cooperation between Western Europe and the United States was long an exercise in quid-pro-quo, when the threat of conflict with the Soviet Union dominated international relations, and Europe's interest in containing the Soviet Union coincided with America's. The coming of the Euro currency as a harbinger of political autonomy across the continent sends a remarkably different message: For the United States to assume that similar levels of cooperation will continue to exist - economic, political and military - will be a very serious mistake.
January 29, 2002
The Presidents speach was great! Finally admitting that Iran has been behind the problems in Afghanistan too. As we mentioned over a month ago, Iran was sheltering, financing and training Afghan troops to go against the new government and has aided Bin Laden and the Al-Qaida since the beginning.
Ok, Iraq, Iran and North Korea mentioned as problems, but what about the big boys behind them, China and Russia? Without the financial and weapons backing from them over the years, we would be living in a peaceful world today.
Study the information below and you will get the picture as to where we are headed!
A former Enron top executive found shot dead.
A former top executive of the failed US energy firm Enron who had strongly criticised the company's murky accounting methods was found dead in his car yesterday from a gunshot wound to the head.
John (Clifford) Baxter was found by police on a routine patrol in the affluent Houston, Texas, suburb of Sugar Land at about 2.30am yesterday morning. He was alone in his Mercedes and a suicide note was found.
His death deepens the mystery surrounding the collapse of Enron, which has threatened to engulf the Bush administration, left thousands of workers without jobs or savings and could bring down one of the oldest names in the accounting profession, Arthur Andersen.
Baxter, 43, the company's former vice-chairman, was said to have "complained mightily" about the Enron transactions which hid its vast debts in offshore ventures and eventually led to the company's collapse.
Police said yesterday there were no signs of foul play but would not release the contents of the potentially explosive suicide note until an investigation was complete.
Baxter had been identified by congressional investigators as a potential key witness in the efforts to uncover how the spectacular collapse of Enron, once ranked the seventh largest company in the US, came about. He had reported directly to Kenneth Lay, the former chairman and chief executive of Enron who is a friend and financial backer of President Bush.
Despite reservations about Enron's methods Baxter, who left the company in May, was among the company's top executives who made their fortune from the sale of Enron shares.
He sold $35m in stock options, $9m of that in 2001. He was one of 29 executives who made a total of $1.1bn in the space of a few years and now face a class action brought by former workers who lost their life savings in the collapse.
Baxter, who joined Enron in 1991, was named in a prescient whistle-blowing letter written by a former colleague last August, which warned the company could "implode in a wave of accounting scandals".
The letter's author, Sherren Watkins, wrote that he had complained "to anyone who would listen about the inappropriateness" of dealings with the offshore ventures being used to hide Enron's debts.
Through her lawyer, Ms Watkins said she was "stunned" by Baxter's death and had received no indication that he was depressed or suicidal.
As for any of you readers that have any psychology background, do a personal profile on this man and you will come up with the same conclusion as we have.
Many of us in Heritage have degrees in Criminology and advance Psychology. We have been doing criminal and personal profiles for over 30 years. Our finding after much background research is that "Mr.Baxter" in no way fits a suicidal profile right up to the day of his death. He had family, children, security and plenty of money and good mental and p[hysical health. His few friends that we conferred with felt the same. He did not commit suicide! If there is a letter, it is forced written, faked, forgery and at any rate not willfully written by Baxter! He had to much going for him and all in his favor, but not the senior executives favor at all! Knowing to much in these times is deadly sometime. Read other simular situations further down in the web site.
There may be at least two witnesses to confirm this fact! We will inform all of our findings. Dave W. for Heritage.
She called him a "straight shooter and a man with high moral ethics" who was not comfortable with what he saw going on at Enron.
The calamitous fall of Enron has had a huge impact, stretching from the rules governing the accountancy profession to the policy on funding political campaigns. The collapse is the subject of at least 10 investigations.
Links between the Bush administration and Enron have come under intense scrutiny. Enron was Mr Bush's biggest single backer during his election campaign and played a role in shaping the government's energy policy. (Our investigations on the situation more than satisfy us as to President Bush's inocents in any wrong doing in the Enron case. He definitely did not offer or attempt to offer them any assistance at all. It is our opinion that in this case his hand are totally clean. We would surely say if they were not!
As the company began to sink, senior executives made a number of direct appeals for aid from the US government, although there is no evidence that anyone within the administration offered to help.
According to research published in the New York Times, of the 248 senators and House members on the various committees investigating Enron's collapse, 212 have received contributions from Enron or Arthur Andersen since 1989.
Baxter was described by another former colleague, Michael Miller, as a "straightforward, honest kind of guy, very interested in doing what was right for the organisation".
Enron said it was "deeply saddened" by his death.
FEMA Executive Orders
Some people have referred to it as the "secret government" of the United States. It is not an elected body, it does not involve itself in public disclosures, and it even has a quasi-secret budget in the billions of dollars. This government organization has more power than the President of the United States or the Congress, it has the power to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial, it can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution Not only is it the most powerful entity in the United States, but it was not even created under Constitutional law by the Congress. It was a product of a Presidential Executive Order. No, it is not the U.S. military nor the Central Intelligence Agency, they are subject to Congress. The organization is called FEMA, which stands for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Originally conceived in the Richard Nixon Administration, it was refined by President Jimmy Carter and given teeth in the Ronald Reagan and George Bush Administrations.
FEMA had one original concept when it was created, to assure the survivability of the United States government in the event of a nuclear attack on this nation. It was also provided with the task of being a federal coordinating body during times of domestic disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes. Its awesome powers grow under the tutelage of people like Lt. Col. Oliver North and General Richard Secord, the architects on the Iran-Contra scandal and the looting of America's savings and loan institutions. FEMA has even been given control of the State Defense Forces, a rag-tag, often considered neo-Nazi, civilian army that will substitute for the National Guard, if the Guard is called to duty overseas.
THE MOST POWERFUL ORGANIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES.
Though it may be the most powerful organization in the United States, few people know it even exists. But it has crept into our private lives. Even mortgage papers contain FEMA's name in small print if the property in question is near a flood plain. FEMA was deeply involved in the Los Angeles riots and the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area. Some of the black helicopter traffic reported throughout the United States, but mainly in the West, California, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and Colorado, are flown by FEMA personnel. FEMA has been given responsibility for many new disasters including urban forest fires, home heating emergencies, refugee situations, urban riots, and emergency planning for nuclear and toxic incidents. In the West, it works in conjunction with the Sixth Army. FEMA was created in a series of Executive Orders. A Presidential Executive Order, whether Constitutional or not, becomes law simply by its publication in the Federal Registry. Congress is by-passed.
Executive Order Number 12148 created the Federal Emergency Management Agency that is to interface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning and funding. An "emergency czar" was appointed. FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies. The bulk of their funding has been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic.
Executive Order Number 12656 appointed the National Security Council as the principal body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and would restrict the freedom of movement within the United States and grant the government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and all ports of entry. Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation.
General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a "new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis." FEMA's powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate: The National Security Act of 1947, which allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities; The 1950 Defense Production Act, which gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy; The Act of August 29, 1916, which authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency; and The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.
HURRICANE ANDREW FOCUSED ATTENTION ON FEMA. FEMA's deceptive role really did not come to light with much of the public until Hurricane Andrew smashed into the U.S. mainland. As Russell R. Dynes, director of the Disaster Research Center of the University of Delaware, wrote in The World and I, "...The eye of the political storm hovered over the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA became a convenient target for criticism." Because FEMA was accused of dropping the ball in Florida, the media and Congress commenced to study this agency. What came out of the critical look was that FEMA was spending 12 times more for "black operations" than for disaster relief. It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress, only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979.
FEMA has developed 300 sophisticated mobile units that are capable of sustaining themselves for a month. The vehicles are located in five areas of the United States. They have tremendous communication systems and each contains a generator that would provide power to 120 homes, but have never been used for disaster relief. FEMA's enormous powers can be triggered easily. In any form of domestic or foreign problem, perceived and not always actual, emergency powers can be enacted. The President of the United States now has broader powers to declare martial law, which activates FEMA's extraordinary powers. Martial law can be declared during time of increased tension overseas, economic problems within the United States, such as a depression, civil unrest, such as demonstrations or scenes like the Los Angeles riots, and in a drug crisis.
These Presidential powers have increased with successive Crime Bills, particularly the 1991 and 1993 Crime Bills, which increase the power to suspend the rights guaranteed under the Constitution and to seize property of those suspected of being drug dealers, to individuals who participate in a public protest or demonstration. Under emergency plans already in existence, the power exists to suspend the Constitution and turn over the reigns of government to FEMA and appointing military commanders to run state and local governments. FEMA then would have the right to order the detention of anyone whom there is reasonable ground to believe...will engage in, or probably conspire with others to engage in acts of espionage or sabotage. The plan also authorized the establishment of concentration camps for detaining the accused, but no trial.
Three times since 1984, FEMA stood on the threshold of taking control of the nation. Once under President Reagan in 1984, and twice under President Bush in 1990 and 1992. But under those three scenarios, there was not a sufficient crisis to warrant risking martial law. Most experts on the subject of FEMA and Martial Law insisted that a crisis has to appear dangerous enough for the people of the United States before they would tolerate or accept complete government takeover. The typical crisis needed would be threat of imminent nuclear war, rioting in several U.S. cites simultaneously, a series of national disasters that affect widespread danger to the populous, massive terrorist attacks, a depression in which tens of millions are unemployed and without financial resources, or a major environmental disaster.
THREE TIMES FEMA STOOD BY READY FOR EMERGENCY
In April 1984, President Reagan signed Presidential Director Number 54 that allowed FEMA to engage in a secret national "readiness exercise" under the code name of REX 84. The exercise was to test FEMA's readiness to assume military authority in the event of a "State of Domestic National Emergency" concurrent with the launching of a direct United States military operation in Central America. The plan called for the deputation of U.S. military and National Guard units so that they could legally be used for domestic law enforcement. These units would be assigned to conduct sweeps and take into custody an estimated 400,000 undocumented Central American immigrants in the United States. The immigrants would be interned at 10 detention centers to be set up at military bases throughout the country.
REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, D.C. Even long-standing employees of the Civil Defense of the Federal Executive Department possessing the highest possible security clearances were not being allowed through the newly installed metal security doors. Only personnel wearing a special red Christian cross or crucifix lapel pin were allowed into the premises. Lt. Col. North was responsible for drawing up the emergency plan, which U.S. Attorney General William French Smith opposed vehemently. The plan called for the suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the government over to FEMA, appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and the declaration of Martial Law. The Presidential Executive Orders to support such a plan were already in place. The plan also advocated the rounding up and transfer to "assembly centers or relocation camps" of a least 21 million American Negroes in the event of massive rioting or disorder, not unlike the rounding up of the Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
The second known time that FEMA stood by was in 1990 when Desert Storm was enacted. Prior to President Bush's invasion of Iraq, FEMA began to draft new legislation to increase its already formidable powers. One of the elements incorporated into the plan was to set up operations within any state or locality without the prior permission of local or state authorities. Such prior permission has always been required in the past. Much of the mechanism being set into place was in anticipation of the economic collapse of the Western World. The war with Iraq may have been conceived as a ploy to boost the bankrupt economy, but it only pushed the West into deeper recession. The third scenario for FEMA came with the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King brutality verdict. Had the rioting spread to other cities, FEMA would have been empowered to step in. As it was, major rioting only occurred in the Los Angeles area, thus preventing a pretext for a FEMA response.
On July 5, 1987, the Miami Herald published reports on FEMA's new goals. The goal was to suspend the Constitution in the event of a national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad. Lt. Col. North was the architect. National Security Directive Number 52 issued in August 1982, pertains to the "Use of National Guard Troops to Quell Disturbances." The crux of the problem is that FEMA has the power to turn the United States into a police state in time of a real crisis or a manufactured crisis. Lt. Col. North virtually established the apparatus for dictatorship. Only the criticism of the Attorney General prevented the plans from being adopted. But intelligence reports indicate that FEMA has a folder with 22 Executive Orders for the President to sign in case of an emergency. It is believed those Executive Orders contain the framework of North's concepts, delayed by criticism but never truly abandoned. The crisis, as the government now sees it, is civil unrest. For generations, the government was concerned with nuclear war, but the violent and disruptive demonstrations that surrounded the Vietnam War era prompted President Nixon to change the direction of emergency powers from war time to times of domestic unrest.
Diana Raynolds, program director of the Edward R. Murrow Center, summed up the dangers of FEMA today and the public reaction to Martial Law in a drug crisis: "It was James Madison's worst nightmare that a righteous faction would someday be strong enough to sweep away the Constitutional restraints designed by the framers to prevent the tyranny of centralized power, excessive privilege, an arbitrary governmental authority over the individual. These restraints, the balancing and checking of powers among branches and layers of government, and the civil guarantees, would be the first casualties in a drug-induced national security state with Reagan's Civil Emergency Preparedness unleashed. Nevertheless, there would be those who would welcome NSC (National Security Council) into the drug fray, believing that increasing state police powers to emergency levels is the only way left to fight American's enemy within.
In the short run, a national security state would probably be a relief to those whose personal security and quality of life has been diminished by drugs or drug related crime. And, as the general public watches the progression of institutional chaos and social decay, they too may be willing to pay the ultimate price, one drug free America for 200 years of democracy."
The first targets in any FEMA emergency would be Hispanics and Blacks, the FEMA orders call for them to be rounded up and detained. Tax protesters, demonstrators against government military intervention outside U.S. borders, and people who maintain weapons in their homes are also targets. Operation Trojan Horse is a program designed to learn the identity of potential opponents to martial law. The program lures potential protesters into public forums, conducted by a "hero" of the people who advocates survival training. The list of names gathered at such meetings and rallies are computerized and then targeted in case of an emergency.
The most shining example of America to the world has been its peaceful transition of government from one administration to another. Despite crises of great magnitude, the United States has maintained its freedom and liberty. This nation now stands on the threshold of rule by non-elected people asserting non-Constitutional powers. Even Congress cannot review a Martial Law action until six months after it has been declared. For the first time in American history, the reigns of government would not be transferred from one elected element to another, but the Constitution, itself, can be suspended. The scenarios established to trigger FEMA into action are generally found in the society today, economic collapse, civil unrest, drug problems, terrorist attacks, and protests against American intervention in a foreign country. All these premises exist, it could only be a matter of time in which one of these triggers the entire emergency necessary to bring FEMA into action, and then it may be too late, because under the FEMA plan, there is no contingency by which Constitutional power is restored.
Beware the Government-Media Complex
Michael Savage addressing the Commonwealth Club of California
Monda, May 15, 2000
Introduction by Master of Ceremonies:
"We are proud to welcome you to the live broadcast of Michael Savage's address to the Commonwealth Club of California, the largest public affairs speaking forum in the United States. Since its founding in 1903, the Commonwealth Club has hosted every American president since Theodore Roosevelt, and it has welcomed persons from every field and endeavour, from Clarence Darrow to the Dali Lama. Please welcome Michael Savage."
Michael Savage:
Thank you very much; I'm honoured to be here. My case will be presented to you as though I were an attorney. My thesis is simple. The title is "Beware the Government-Media Complex."
I hope to prove to you that perhaps never before in American history has there been so cozy a relationship between government and media. It is a relationship that transcends left and right. It has nothing to do with race and nothing to do with politics but everything to do with press freedom.
At the outset let me give you a small, capsule, example of what I mean. Many of the speeches to the Commonwealth Club are not only picked up by the local radio stations, such as NPR, but are also transmitted by C-Span, whose broadcasts are paid for by your cable TV payments. Despite the press releases sent to them by my radio station, do you see any of their people here today? No!
I understand my being here is not earth-shaking news. It certainly doesn't compare with Buddy's, the Clinton pooch's, castration, which is making the headlines. But at least some coverage might be appropriate, especially in light of the stature of your organization.
As you know, the media is very badly needed to serve as a thorn in the side of government. In order to keep the government reasonably honest we need the media to be constantly poking at it. However, when the media becomes a thorn in the side of the skeptical private citizen, then it becomes an arm of the government. That's why I say, "Beware the Government-Media Complex."
Let me go to some local stories and show you how it is coloured. When five revolutionary Mexican communists beat a lone, elderly white male in Los Angeles not long ago, they were featured as heros of the revolution in the local San Francisco newspaper. When a mob of homosexuals burned state offices a few years back because one of their platforms was not accepted by Governor Pete Wilson, they were called a collective voice of the oppressed by the San Francisco Chronicle and the Examiner.
When the homosexual radicals broke into San Francisco Republican Party headquarters and terrorised workers and destroyed computers, these terrorists were called valiant, oppressed voices. When agitators for the homeless riot, when they burn trash cans and break the law, they're held up as freedom fighters for the poor by the left-leaning press.
But if one compassionate conservative dares to speak out, he's condemned to the Gulag of media silence, the Gulag of media exile. This startling bias in the media is more threatening to the pillars of our republic than even the most ardent conservative might believe.
It is censorship by default as well. What do I mean by censorship by default? Where the commercial interests of the media moguls are so intertwined with government policy as to create an overly friendly image of government officials and their policies. It may not be as clear as a close conspiracy to bias the news, but it results in the same form of censorship of dissent.
Now this bias is not limited to the left. It is largely a product of left-wing bias when it comes to certain social issues such as Affirmative Action and "gay" rights. But the right also biases the news when it wants to shape fiscal issues to its benefit. Example, Rupert Murdoch and the China scandal a while back.
I first began my file on the government-media complex several years ago. I noticed an alarming bias, and I knew this could sink the ship of truth. Surely other administrations have had their friends in high media places. Still, there were many voices and many views of dissent that found their way into the national media. But now we have a growing media blackout of some serious crimes and misdemeanors, all unsolved to the satisfaction of those with critical faculties of reason.
Which events am I refering to? The loss of confidential laptop computers by the head of the CIA and Albright's State Department. Vince Foster's death has still not been satisfactorily resolved in the minds of many Americans. Waco, where over 80 men, women and children were burned to death. Has anyone been tried and sent to jail for that event, or even been held accountable for it? Whitewater, also still unsolved. Travelgate, Ruby Ridge. What about all of the incriminating evidence in security-agent Gary Aldrich's book, "Unlimited Access"? What about Ron Brown's strange death that concerns so many African-Americans, or TWA Flight 800, or the wholesale give away of the jewels of our nuclear secrets from Los Alamos National Laboratory to the Communist Chinese?
We know about these events because the dam of silence has cracked. But the old media hacks beat their journalistic bongos to the rhythm of fruit flies dancing on a rotten tomato. Who has paid for these crimes and misdemeanors? Who has paid for the execution of Sammy Weaver and his mother? Who has paid for leaking 900 FBI files, and who is being blackmailed by them?
Now although the media's generally favourable coverage of Mr. Clinton's behaviour and politics is the main concern of most media watchers, it is not the only concern. Take any major policy issue, and you're going to see the government official line reflected by the media elite. Let's look at some issues: Affirmative Action; immigration, legal and illegal; the drug epidemic. How often do you hear about these issues?
You hear a constant refrain, for example, about the dangers of tobacco. But how often do you hear about the crack epidemic, the growing use of marijuana, the heroin epidemic? You do hear about it now and then, but what you hear mostly is about tobacco, tobacco, tobacco, or welfare, the so-called homelessness issue, taxes, and the other favourite issues to beguile us. Each and every issue as reflected in the old-line news media – that is, the TV network news and the establishment newspapers and magazines – is a parallel reflection of official Clinton policy.
Listen to this carefully if you will. Tell me if you agree. Hoover Institution historian Robert Conquest said that in the former Soviet Union the press was totally under the control of the state. All editors were members of the Communist Party. Here in the United States of America a frighteningly imbalanced Washington press corps exists. Eighty-nine percent of these apparatchiks of the DNC voted for Bill Clinton in 1992!
Let me repeat, "The media is needed by the public to be and remain a thorn in the side of the government in order to keep the government relatively honest. But when the media instead becomes a thorn in the side of the sceptical private citizen, the media then becomes an arm of the government."
Is this not worrisome? "Beware the Government-Media Complex." They sub-liminally program you as to what they want you to believe, think, eat, wear and attitude. Mind and body control, and maybe your spirit too!
For those of us who still accept the Bible as God's revealed will to man, it's a matter of great concern to see the increasing propaganda for, and emergence of, a New World Order. Briefly put, beginning more than two thousand years ago both Old and New Testaments warned us that the culmination of history would be marked by the reunion of the nations of the old Roman Empire in Europe; the restoration of the state of Israel [and the increasing hostility of all nations toward her]; the implementation of a one-world governmental system; the imposition of a world-wide cashless monetary system; the development of a synchretistic world religion, based upon man, and presided over by a false prophet; the rise to power of a benign world dictator, who [once firmly in control] would eliminate individual freedoms, demonstrate iron-willed ferocity and cruelty, and make himself the object of worship; and world-wide apostacy, coupled with active persecution and execution of believing Jews and Christians. If you're interested, check for yourself in Ezekiel 38 and 39; Daniel 7; Zechariah 12-14; Matthew 24; 2 Thessalonians 4; and the Book of Revelation.
The phenomenal rise of the European Union, the amazing creation of the State of Israel, the increasing surrender of international authority and policing power to the U.N., recurrent and increasing currency and financial crises, and the gradual abandonment of the Biblical revelation on which Western civilisation was built, all give us due warning that very tough and delusive times are coming. We should be as skilled in reading the spiritual portents of the times in which we live as we are in reading the weather, and we should prepare accordingly.
The following carefully-chosen books from various publishers are all solid, informative and factual, and would well repay careful reading. As for ourselves, we're trusting to the grace and mercy of God, and not in the dangerous chimera of "human progress", and we hope that you are too.
EXCERPTS FROM SENATOR JESSE HELMS' SPEECH BEFORE THE SENATE, ON 15 DECEMBER, 1987, WARNING AGAINST THE NEW WORLD ORDER:
"This campaign against the American people -against traditional American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare. It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left.
Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational coporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.
Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a New World Order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles.
The psychological campaign that I am describing, as I have said, is the work of groups within the Eastern establishment, that amorphous amalgam of wealth and social connections whose power resides in its control over our financial system and over a large portion of our industrial sector. The principal instrument of this control over the American economy and money is the Federal Reserve System. The policies of the Industrial sectors, primarily the multinational corporations, are influenced by the money center banks through debt financing and through the large blocks of stock controlled by the trust departments of the money center banks.
Anyone familiar with American history, and particularly American economic history, cannot fail to notice the control over the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency which Wall Street seems to exercise....
The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time. This pervasive influence runs contrary to the real long-term national security of our Nation. It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order.
The viewpoint of the establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the "one-world" view by its critics. The phrase is no longer fashionable among sophisticates; yet, the phrase "one-world" is still apt because nothing has changed in the minds and actions of those promoting policies consistent with its fundamental tenets.
Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.
In this point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece - into being. . . . All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the twin pillars of debt and monopoly. This isn't real capitalism. It is the road to economic concentration and to political slavery."
Interested in reading more, and being warned, about the New World Order? The following books are invaluable and highly readable resources:
•EN ROUTE TO GLOBAL OCCUPATION - G. KAH
•TOWARD A NEW WORLD ORDER - DON MACALVANY
•NEW WORLD ORDER - WILLIAM STILL
•THE UNSEEN HAND - RALPH EPPERSON
•THE ROCKEFELLER FILE - GARY ALLEN
•WHEN THE WORLD WILL BE AS ONE - TAL BROOKE
•NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY- GARY ALLEN
•THE TWISTED CROSS -JOSEPH CARR
•THE NAKED CAPITALIST - W. CLEON SKOUSEN
•WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER- ANTHONY SUTTON
•NOW IS THE COMING OF THE NEW AGE NEW WORLD ORDER - DR. L. CUDDY
•SECRET SOCIETIES AND SUBVERSIVE MOVEMENTS - NESTA WEBSTER
•CIRCLE OF INTRIGUE - TEXE MARRS
•THE SHADOWS OF POWER - JAMES PERLOFF
•DESCENT INTO SLAVERY - DES GRIFFIN
How ready is China to take control of America?
The Multilateral Agreement on Investment:
Someone sent in an article originally published in the New York Times on February 13, 1998 entitled "Top Secret: New MAI Treaty - Should Corporations Govern the World?". Well, I thought, of course not. Now, everyone loves another controversy - and another shot at the Transnational Corporations, so I read it with avid interest. Within about a week or so, the April-May 98 issue of Nexus Magazine arrived, sporting another article entitled "MAIgalomania! The Multilaterial Agreement on Investment". Well, I thought, I have heard of the MAI before - transnational corporations intent on taking over the world, gaining corporate domination over governments, allowing corporations and investors unprecedented legal standing to sue foreign nations. Amazing, I thought, how things have really deteriorated. Then I took a closer look. Now, it cost a lot of money to put a full page ad in the New York Times. A bunch of "patriots" who got together and chipped in the money to protest corporate world dominance? Right? No.
Something else was going on here that seemed to be escaping everyones attention, both on the internet, and even the staff of Nexus magazine. Not everything is always what it appears to be. So, looking down at the bottom of the page in the New York Times, we see that the full page spread was paid for by the "International Forum on Globalization" (IFG) . Hmm, I thought. Globalists Fighting International Corporate capitalism. Well, let's see. International Corporate capitalism is still Global Socialism. So, it would be Globalists fighting Global Socialism? It doesn't figure on its face- what does it really mean? On the IFG Board of Directors "and/or the Committee on Global Finance" were listed the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C, the Transnational Institute in Amsterdam, The Ecologist in London, The International Center for Technology Assessment in Washington, D.C, and the Sierra Club.
Ah, I thought. Sounds like a page out of Dr. John Coleman's Committee of 300. That's odd. I took a look at the article in Nexus Magazine. The article in Nexus was a Part 1 of a briefing by the "Corporate Europe Observatory", headquartered in Amsterdam! So, we have a split happening in what we generally and collectively refer to as the "New World Order". Who are the two sides in this drama?
On one side we have the Anglo-American Hegemony - the United States, England, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand - the "early" globalist New World Order group who set everything up in the beginning - what people generally refer to as the N.W.O. Arising from this group, or as a result of their influence, were the transnational corporations and non-governmental agencies which worked hand-in-hand with the old group. So, both parties - the group fighting the MAI and the group promoting the MAI, can both be categorized as "New World Order".
The "democratic globalists", the more benign camp, somewhat committed to human democratic values (Anglo-American N.W.O.) , is this group who wrote the articles in the New York Times and Nexus Magazine. The extremist N.W.O. movement, represented by the Transnational Corporations, the Global Organizations (UN, IMF, World Bank, etc) - the totalitarian globalists - represent the other side who desires the MAI - Red China represents their model of "success" in terms of the realization of population control, etc.
As a side note for the more eclectic readers, it is the second group who controls the highest technology, including technology with off-planet origin, time-travel technology, Montauk-type technology, and the particle beam devices on the Moon that are affecting the weather patterns being blamed totally on "El Nino." What is causing the split? A combination of factors. The first factor seems to be the Y2K computer problem, which will have an effect on governmental (early N.W.O. group) computer systems and organizational capabilities, to a great degree causing havoc and affecting the ability to manage nations.
This problem, however, extends beyond the original Anglo-American group. The second major factor? China. The transnational corporations have been working to technologically improve Chinese capabilities, as well as establish corporate bases in China, especially during the last two years or so. Notice how the Chinese have been moved into the United States by the corporations and factions within the government who have favored the corporations.
The Chinese have taken over a naval base in California. There is a large Chinese population in Vancouver, British Columbia. The original reactionary New World Order had the idea of Anglo-American world dominance, whereas the extremist New World Order has the idea of global control through their own economic institutions. The extremist side sees the original Anglo-American group as an impediment to the realization of their goal - world dominance through technocratic control, so they are very much prepared to see the United States collapse. All of this is appearing now in the linear time track because of the China issue.
Bill Clinton has basically given ICBM plans to the Chinese, as well as virtually all US patents ---
•TRAGEDY AND HOPE - CARROLL QUIGLEY
•THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT - CARROLL QUIGLEY
Bloody Bill Clinton American Caligula
Rixon Stewart
Bill Clinton is forever finished on the presidential office but he leaves in his wake a trail of allegations that, if true, would rank him alongside some of history’s most notorius criminals. He has been implicated in cocaine use by none other than his younger brother Roger Clinton, himself a convicted drug trafficker. In an Arkansas State Police surveillance audio tape, obtained by freelance journalist Scott Wheeler, Roger Clinton can be heard describing how he smuggled large amounts of cocaine through airports. Most significant were his comments about the then Arkansas State Governor, "Got to get some for my brother; he’s got a nose like a vacuum cleaner."
This is not just groundless speculation .In 1990 Sharlene Wilson, an informant for the Seventh Judicial drug task force in Arkansas, testified under oath that she had supplied Governor Bill Clinton with cocaine. Shortly thereafter the drug task force was closed down and Wilson herself was charged with drug violations. In 1992 she was sentenced to 31 years for selling half an ounce of marijuana and $100 worth of methamphetamine.
Clinton’s misdemeanors amount to more than drug use though, much more One of the first things Clinton did on assuming the presidency was to appoint Patsy Thomasson - a top lieutenant of convicted drug dealer Dan Lasater - as White House chief of personnel. Clinton then installed his friend Webster Hubbel as "shadow" Attorney General, until Hubbel was jailed for fraud. Prior to his becoming assistant Attorney General he had been over billing clients at the Rose Law firm, in Little Rock Arkansas, where he had been a partner with Hilary Clinton.
Then we have the "suicide" of Vincent Foster. As reported in The SPOTLIGHT, featured in the previous edition of The Seeker, Forster had been deeply disturbed by events at Waco and had been in the process of preparing a potentially damming report. So Clinton had good reason to want him out of the way and as many suspect his death was not a suicide; eyewitness accounts by police and ambulance crew members who recovered Foster’s body and official autopsy findings are distinctly at odds.
One of the reasons that Clinton has been able to get away with so much is the compliance of the mainstream media.As one of the few journalist’s who has covered Clinton’s time in office with any honesty and insight, Ambrose Pritchard-Evans noted:
"The Washington press corps has chosen not to report this sort of thing, of course, because it always gives more weight to the utterings of an "official" source, with a title, than it does to the testimony of a common citizen."
As a result Clinton has been allowed to get away with murder. Literally.
Yet he is guilty of far more.He has been implicated in rape, sexual assault, mass murder (Waco) and, as we detailed in a previous issue, War crimes in Iraq and the former Yugoslavia. Indeed it is no exaggeration to say that history may well place Bill Clinton alongside the likes of Nero and Caligula. Here then is a list of people who have been connected in some way with Bill Clinton and who have died in rather suspicious circumstances:
1) Susan Coleman: said to have had an affair with Clinton before he became President. Told friends she was expecting his child and was 7 months pregnant when she found dead with a gunshot wound to the head. Verdict, suicide.
2)Larry Guerrin: killed while investigating the INSLAW case. In brief this involved the US Justice Department using stolen software, modifying it for intelligence purposes and then selling it to foriegn governments and making millions in the process.
3)Kevin Ives and Don Henry: two 16 year old boys who may have stumbled accross drug running operations involving Clinton at Mena airfeild in Arkansas in 1987.Initial reports, by State Medical Examiner Fahmy Malak, suggested that the boys had fallen asleep on the railway line and been crushed. However when the parents kicked up a fuss another forensic report showed Kevin’s skull had been crushed prior to being placed on the track whilst Don had been stabbed in the back.
4)Keith Coney, said he had information on Ives and Henry deaths. Died in a high speed motorcycle crash in 1989,said to have involved a car chase.
5)Keith McKaskle, said to have information on the Ives and Henry deaths. Stabbed to death in November 1988.
6)Gregory Collins, once again said to have information on the Ives and Henry deaths and once again killed, this time by a gunshot wound to the face.
8)Jeff Rhodes was also said to have information on the deaths of Ives and Henry. He was found on a waste heap in April 1989 with a gunshot wound to the head.
9)James Milam also had information on the Ives and Henry deaths but before he could talk too widely he was found decapitated. Once again the State Medical Examiner, Fahmy Malak, ruled the death due to natural causes.
10)Richard Winters, a suspect in the Ives and Henry case had offered to cooperate and give evidence. However he died in a ‘robbery’ which was subsequently proved to have been a set-up.
11)Jordan Kettleson was also said to have information on the Ives and Henry deaths. He was found shot dead in his pick-up in June 1990.
12)Danny Casalaro, a journalist investigating Mena airstrip, the Arkansas coke trade and INSLAW. Had warned his family that he had learnt too much and not to believe it was suicide if he turned up dead. Shortly thereafter he was found in a bathtub in the Sheraton Hotel in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Both his wrists had been slashed, one ten times, all his research material was missing and has never been recovered.
13)Victor Raiser, the National Co-Chair for the "Clinton for President" campaign, died in an airplane crash in July, 1992.
14)R Montgomery Raiser, also worked on the Clinton campaign and died in the same crash.
15)Ian Spiro, said to have supporting documentation for grand jury proceedings in the INSLAW case. His wife and three children were found murdered in their home in November 1992.All had gunshot wounds to the head. Ian’s body later was found in a car in the Borego Desert. FBI reports concluded that he had shot his family and then committed suicide by taking cyanide.
16)Paula Grober, Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf. Killed in car smash with no other cars involved and no witnesses. She is said to have been very attractive and travelled extensively with Clinton prior to her death in December 1992.
All the above died prior to Clinton’s inauguration in January 1993.In its aftermath the deaths not only continued but became even more numerous.
17)Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Todd McKeahan and Conway LeBleu were the only four BAFT men killed at Waco. In an autopsy performed by a "private Docter" all four were found to have near identical "execution style" headwounds. All four had previously been bodyguards for Clinton prior to their deaths in April 1993.
18)Sgt. Brian Haney, Sgt.Tim Sabel, Maj. William Barkley and Capt. Scott Reynolds. Once again all four men had been bodyguards for Clinton prior to their deaths in a helicopter crash near Quantico, Va.Reporters were barred from the scene whilst firefighters responding to the crash had their video tapes seized and a fire chief described a scene where, "security was tight" with "lots of marines with guns."
18)Paul Wilcher was found dead shortly after presenting Attorney General Janet Reno with a report on Waco, Death ruled to "unknown causes. "See extracts from the report in this issue.
19White House deputy counsel Vincent Foster was said to have been preparing a potentially damming report on Waco at the time of his death. As reported in the previous issue he had been deeply disturbed by events at Waco and his death, in July 1993, was officially labelled a "suicide.".
20)Stanley Heard and Steven Dickson were members of Clinton’s Health Advisory Committee. Both died in an air crash in September 1993.
21)Jerry Luther Parks, Chief of Security at Clinton’s national campaign headquarters in Little Rock. He was shot through the rear window of his car, the killer then went to the driver’s side of Park’s car and pumped three more 9mm bullets into him. His family reported that shortly before his death their home had been broken into, despite a top line security system. Park’s had been preparing a dossier on Clinton’s activities, the dossier was stolen.
22)Ed Willey, a Clinton fundraiser, was found shot dead in November 1993.Once again the death was ruled suicide. His wife Kathleen, who was working as a White House volunteer at the time, claimed that Clinton sexually assaulted her when she had approached him, distraught over the loss of her husband.
Indeed allegations of sexual assault and even rape go back a long way with Clinton. As far back as 1969 in fact when Clinton was still a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. A retired State Department employee said he believed a young English woman who claimed she had been raped by Clinton.
"There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma," he said.
"But we were under tremendous pressure to aviod the embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was the last I heard of it."
She is not the only woman who has accused Clinton of rape. Early in 1999 Juanita Broaddrick, an Arkansas woman who worked on Clinton’s campaign when he was attorney general in 1978, told NBC that he had raped her. Claiming pressure from the White House NBC shelved the report.
Then we have the case of Elizabeth Ward, a former Miss Arkansas who claimed that Clinton had forced himself on her shortly after she won the State crown. Last year she told an interviewer that she did have sex with him but that it was consensual; she later recanted saying that she had been threatened by Clinton supporters into claiming the sex was consensual.
And still the killings go on...
23)Dr Roland Rogers a Dentist from Arkansas. Died on his way to the Sunday Telegraph in London to reveal "sensitive" information about Clinton in March 1994
24) Kathy Furguson, a 38 year old hospital worker whose ex-husband was a co-defendant in the Paula Jones case. She died in May 1994, from a gunshot wound to the head, ruled suicide; curiously next to the body were several packed suitcases, as if she was getting ready to go somewhere.
25)Bill Shelton was Kathy’s boyfriend and an Arkansas police officer. He was found on her grave the following month with a gunshot wound to the back of the head. Judged to be "suicide".
26)Alan G Whicher, oversaw Clinton’s Secret Service detail. He was transferred to a field office in Oklahoma City in October 1994.Whatever warning was given to the other BAFT agents in the building (none of whom came to work that day) failed to reach him, he died on April 19 1995 in the infamous Oklahoma City bomb blast.Incidently the families of the victims of the blast are now preparing to sue the U.S. Govermant, saying it had prior knowledge of the bombing.
27)Ron Brown, Commerce Secretary died along with 35 other people on April 3,1996, in an air crash involving Airforce 2. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated and had spoken publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecuters. According to one report he allegedly told Clinton, "he was not going down alone." However his death brought that possibility to an abrupt end. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the back of Brown’s head that resembled a gunshot wound. And we are not counting the other 35 people who died in the same crash.
28)Shelly Kelly, an Air Force stewardess was onboard the same flight, at the back of the plane, and suffered only minor cuts and bruises in the crash. Indeed she was able to board a rescue helicopter without assistance. She died later died in hospital, supposedly from a loss of blood. According to journalist Joe L Jordan, an autopsy revealed a three inch cut over her main femoral artery which was sustained over three hours after all her other cuts and bruises. Thereafter Clinton ordered the bodies of all the victims cremated.
28)Barbara Wise a Commerce Department employee. She was found dead in her locked office, partially nude and covered in bruises, following a long weekend. Officially she is said to have died of natural causes.
29)Christine M Mirzayan, Clinton intern killed on August 1 1998.In the publicity prior to the Paula jones law suit Newsweek revealed that "a former White House staffer" with the initial "M" was about to go public with a story about sexual harassment at the White House. Thereafter Christine was found beaten to death with a heavy object near Georgetown University, Washington.
30)Mary Mahoon was another former White House intern who was about to go public with a story of sexual harrasment at the White House. Before she could though some unknown characters entered a Washington Starbuck’s, where she was working, and shot her dead. Her two assistant’s, Aaron Goodrich, 18 and Emory Evans were taken to a room along with Mary and pumped full of bullets.Mary was shot in the chest, face and back of the head, probably with silencers as nobody in the densely populated area heard anything. Even though the killers left $4000 in the cashbox untouched, the police catagorised the killings as a robbery whilst acknowledging its "execution style".
As reported in the previous issue of the Seeker four members of Delta Force have recently died in training "accidents". They were Lt Col Anthony A. Boyles and Sgt Eric Ellingson, killed in river "training accidents." Master Sgt Gaetano Cutino, killed while "exiting" from a helicopter. And Sgt Jamey Dimase killed while participating in marksmanship training. These were the men who had actually gone into the Branch Davidian compound at Waco and carried out the killings of 86 men, women and children. These men were hardened professional killers, yet even they had been disturbed by what they had been ordered to do and actually done. So much so that given immunity from prosecution they had been prepared to come forward and testify. Although Paul Wilcher does not name them in his report these were the very individuals whose testimony could have demolished Clinton’s Presidency.
During our investigations during those times, we did manage to get a copy of the Waco Report and kept it in our secure holdings in Canada along with all of our past cases.
The following was extracted from a report prepared by Attorney Paul Wilcher, a report based on eyewitness testimony. The members of the very assault team mentioned in the following report had indeed been in contact with Paul Wilcher, via a third party, and given immunity from prosecution they had been prepared to testify. Even though these were hardened professional killers, what they had been ordered to do and actually done at Waco had deeply disturbed them. On May 21st,1993, Wilcher went to present the following to US Attorney General Janet Reno, on June 23rd Wilcher’s badly decomposed body was found in his appartment. Upon discovery his apartment was sealed and searched and all documents removed. That indeed might have been the end of the matter but Wilcher had given a copy of his 100 page report to Sara McClendon, a senior White House correspondent, shortly before his death.
Wilcher had made one critical mistake in presuming the innocence of Janet Reno and Bill Clinton, it was a mistake that was to cost him his life.
In mid 1999 the report re-emerged, whereupon the four members of the Delta Force assault team involved at Waco all died in training "accidents". The fact that they are not named in this report had probably allowed them to live so long. However as soon as the report re-appeared the "accidents" occurred, effectively "silencing their testimony forever."
"What actually happened in Waco, according to the information I have been given is as follows:
1) As early as Sunday afternoon or evening, April 18th (shortly after your conference with President Clinton), calls went in to the Parkland Hospital in Dallas--the very same hospital where President Kennedy was taken after his assassination in Dealey Plaza on November 22nd 1963 -- again, at the hands of CIA professional killers -- to be prepared to receive a large number of serious burn from Waco the following day.
2)On the morning of April 19th, the same Delta Force commando team -- actually, a select group of the CIA’s top professional killers -- which would have carried what I have referred to above the the "penultimate plan," had it been approved -- was on the ground in Waco to carry out all aspects of the "wet" operation planned for that Monday.
3)This mass murder was then to be covered up and made to look like a "mass suicide" -- just like Jonestown -- thereby layering one monstrous CIA lie upon another -- since both Waco and Jonestown were CIA mass murders, and not mass suicides.
4)This Delta Force was composed of 15 men in all, headed by a Lieutenant Colonel who was a CIA liason officer. The group flew into Texas on their own C-130 transport plane , parked it at the Waco or Dallas airport all day, then departed once their "dirty work" had been completed. The plane belongs to Triangle.
5)Among the 15 men in this larger group, there were two (2) smaller operational teams -- thr 4-man team which actually made the insertion into the compound, as described in detail below, and a back up team, which apparently was never used.
6)These were all dressed in black -- black pants, black shoes, black jackets, black gas masks, black gloves -- very poetic for a black or wet operation -- and were dressed to look like all the other FBI officers on the ground -- probably even wearing jackets with FBI insignias on them (though I am not certain of this), so that to any outside observer, there would have been virtually no way of telling these four men apart from any of the other federal officers on the scene at the time.
7)The whole nation watched on TV that morning as the FBI used M1-A1 tanks to punch holes in the exterior walls of the compound’s living quarters. We were later told that at the same time they had battered down these walls, the tanks had also lobbed massive quantities of a very virulent form tear gas into the compound.
8)This tear gas had been designed to be used for crowd control -- i.e, it was so virulent and irritating that even in a fresh air out of doors situation, it was guaranteed to cause people to flee from its presence simply in order to be able to breathe.
9)Now, it was being used in a closed, indoor, living quarters situation where 95 men, women and children were trapped inside. The logical expectation would have been that all 95 of these persons would have fled out-of-doors instantly, just to be able to breath .But strangely, not a single person came out of the compound -- even after this noisome substance had been poured into the compound in enormous quantities over a period of several hours.
10)The logical therefore arises: Why? Why did not ANY of these 95 men, women and children -- particularly the women and children -- instantly flee for fresh air into the out of doors?
The answer we have been given by the news media and the official FBI spokesman is that David Koresh and his cult members had stockpiled and outfitted themselves with gas masks.
TEAR GAS -- AND NERVE GAS -- WERE USED
11)The real truth, however, is much more sinister and cold blooded. For what actually happened here is that the tear gas -- as virulent and noisome as it was -- was only the mask or cover for the real active ingredient being propelled by the tanks into the compound.
What was actually propelled into the compound was a nerve reagent -- a neuro toxin -- NERVE GAS a virulent poisonous substance like curare -- which instantly paralysed and rendered totally helpless and defenceless all of the 95 men, women and children inside the compound -- except for those 9, later rescued, like David Thibideaux, who were on the 2nd and 3rd floor with their windows wide open on both sides, and who were thus spared the deadly effects of this tear gas/nerve gas combination.
For all the others, they could no longer co-ordinate their muscles in the effort required even just to get up, much less flee to the life sustaining fresh air outside, only a few feet away.
This is an extremely serious matter, Attorney General Reno. For it means that here the U.S. military, the FBI, and the Justice Department -- directed by the CIA -- used nerve gas on innocent men, women and children in our civilian population -- and then proceeded to murder them in cold blood, as is set out in detail below. This clearly rises to the level of War Crimes on a civilian population during peace time, an unspeakable human rights violation.
And it was committed by our intelligence community against innocent men, women and children -- simply to bury the truth concerning the CIA’s criminal use of mind control programming to "manufacture" "Manchurian Candidate type" robot assassins whose very existence is an unspeakable outrage, in and of itself.
THE "DELTA FORCE" TEAM ENTERS THE COMPOUND"
12)After this deadly tear gas/nerve gas combination had had time to do its debilitating and paralysing work on all the men ,women and children in the compound, 4-man "Delta Force" team -- actually some of the CIA’s top professional assassins -- made its entry into the compound. Fittingly for a black operation, they were dressed all in black, from head to toe, as stated above.
13)They were dropped onto the roof of the compound by one of the several low-flying, heavily armed military helicopters which hovered overhead throughout much of the day -- while all of the television cameras were focused on the outside of the building at ground level -- for example, focusing on the tanks which had just lobbed the tear gas/nerve gas combination into the building. The actual insertion into the building came at approximately 10:25AM.
14)Before they entered the compound, however, this four man team of assassins had received shots of atropine, the antidote to the nerve gas, so that they, too, would not be overcome and paralysed by it.
15)According to the testimony given before the House Judiciary Committee on the day of your testimony, Attorney General Reno, the fires in the Branch Davidian compound did not become visible until approximately 11:45AM that morning. This means that the team had something in the neighbourhood of one(1) hour and fifteen (15) minutes, or so, in which to do their "dirty work", and then to make their escape.
16)The murder of David Koresh :
One of the first things they did, obviously, was to go into the so-called communications center, just off the kitchen, where they found, and quickly subdued and killed, David Koresh, along with any of his close associates who were nearby. David Koresh was killed with a single bullet to the middle of the forehead , about an inch above the eyes, fired from a distance of about four inches away.
In this regard, an article on page A-3 of The Washington Post, on Tuesday, May 18th,1993, is directly relevant. It quotes noted forensic pathologist, Dr Cyril H Wecht of Pittsburg, who had recently completed an independent autopsy of the bodies of David Koresh and Steve Schneider, one of his chief lieutenants, as saying that the gunshot wound in the middle of the forehead, which killed Koresh, and the gunshot wound in the back of the head, which killed Schneider, are "not typical of suicide."
And no wonder! They were, in fact, NOT killed by suicide at all. This was a calculated, carefully planned, cold-blooded mass murder...
17)From the communications center, the "wet" team then fanned out throughout the rest of the compound, and methodically "took out"(i.e. murdered) all of the other six (6) CIA "sleepers" they would have murdered earlier, in what I have called the "penultimate plan", had that plan been allowed to go forward, plus a number of other persons along the way....
HOW THE FIRES WERE STARTED
18)The remaining task for this "wet" team -- after the multiple murders, described above , had been carried out -- while they were still inside, was to place 3 or 4 canisters of "Willie Peter" (White Phosphorus) in strategic locations throughout the compound in order to start the fires.
These canisters were all equipped with delayed timing devices, all set to go off simultaneously -- apparently at or before 11:45AM, that’s when the fires were actually sighted by outside observers on the scene.
White phosphorus is one of the most fearsome incendiary devices imaginable, and is therefore a favourite of the CIA’s "wet" teams. It ignites instantly, immediately burns with white hot intensity, and consumes, beyond all recognition, everything in its path -- thereby destroying all possible forensic evidence -- and covering, as well as one can possibly imagine, the trail of assassins (like this particular "wet" team) who want to try and claim later that their actual mass murder was merely a "mass suicide" or a "tragic accident."
CIA "wet" teams have also been known to corner their intended targets into a closed quarter, and then throw "Willie Peter" into their midst, so that these victims are instantly immolated right before the teams eyes.
The fire which "Willie Peter" produces is so intense, and the combustion so complete, that victims -- as was the case here in Waco -- can only be identified by their dental records.
But here, because the team itself was inside the closed quarters, they had to use delayed timing devices on the "Willie Peter" canisters -- to give themselves time to make their own exit before the entire compound was consumed in the monumental conflagration we all watched in horror on television.
19)Notice that this explanation of how the fires started comports with the observations on the scene -- with what the television cameras at ground level recorded, and with what the military helicopters and their infrared cameras overhead observed -- i.e., that 3 or 4 fires started simultaneously at different places in the compound. And then these separate fires spread rapidly (because of the wood construction, the straw which was everywhere, the high winds, and the white hot "Willie Peter" incendiary devices which had started these separate blazes in the first place), until they became united into a cohesive whole, involving the entire compound, which became far more destructive than the sum of these separate smaller fires, until it ultimately became a massive conflagration which consumed everything in sight.
One possible contrary explanation, which has been offered by commentators and the "tragic accident theory" advocates, is that the tear gas sprayed into the compound by the tanks...(ignoring the fact that what was injected was NOT just tear gas but a tear gas/nerve gas combination) was itself a combustible substance, that one of the tanks, in punching holes in the exterior walls, had accidentally knocked over a kerosene lantern or container, and that the kerosene had then ignited the tear gas, which resulted in the conflagration.
This "tragic accident" theory, however, simply does NOT square with the known facts, preserved on video tape, because the compound did NOT explode into a massive fireball all at once (as would have been the case if the tear gas itself had been combustible, and had ignited by a torch, like lighted kerosene).
20)The other point to be made here is that, while the "wet" team did kill many of those inside the compound prior to setting the fires(by means of the "Willie Peter" canisters on delayed timing devices, discussed above)
they apparently did NOT murder (at least, directly) ALL of the 86 men, women and children who ultimately died in the tragedy -- meaning that many of those who died were left paralysed by the nerve gas, unable to get up or free themselves from this disaster in progress, and were thus consigned to being consumed alive in the giant conflagration brought on by the white phosphorus.
And those consigned to this horrible fiery fate -- being burned alive -- apparently included men, women and children. NOTE WELL
21)The bottom line here is that 86 men, women and children died -- i.e. they were murdered -- in the Branch Davidian compound on Monday, April 19th, 1993 -- ALL at the hands of the 4 members of this CIA "wet" team, operating under cover of the "Delta Force".
22)The bottom line is also that high ranking officials in our goverment...
-- though NOT yourself, Attorney General Reno, and NOT President Clinton --
...including senior Reagan and Bush Administration holdovers in the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, the Pentagon and the CIA -- all knew in advance of this Waco operation was designed from the start to be a mass murder in which only those few individuals whom the CIA had targeted in advance to be saved would be allowed to survive -- and that ALL of the other 86 men, women and children in the compound would be murdered in cold blood by these CIA Delta Force assassins.
23) I mentioned on page 30 above that one of the uses the CIA makes of its mind control sophistication is to implant memory blocks into the subconscious memories of its top professional assassins -- in order to allow them to live with what they have done, and NOT to be overcome by flashbacks and nightmares of their "handiwork."
Note Well: But I have been informed that those memory blocks are NOT holding very well in this instance and that some or all of the four (4) members of this particular "wet" team are sickened by what they were ordered to do, and what they did, in fact, "accomplish", in Waco on April 19th. To these hardened, seasoned professional assassins, it was all "too easy " The people inside the compound (as a result of the nerve gas) simply "never had a chance."
POSTSCRIPT
On July 1,1993, Gunther Russbacher smuggled the following information out of the prison where he was being held. Russbacher, a top CIA pilot and marksman, was the son of one of the organisations founders and consequently privy to many of its secrets. Significantly he was also a client of Attorney Paul Wilcher and a close confidant. At the time of writing we do not know whether he is still in prison, or indeed whether he is even alive. This is the story of the last day of Paul Wilcher’s life, obtained from a hand written note smuggled out of a high security jail by Russbacher’s wife.
Paul Wilcher Story
1. Paul was picked up at his apt., taken to Vienna, VA where he was questioned as to the Bush, Webster and Carter accounts with London S.W. BCCI
2.He was questioned for approximately 2 hours at which time he was fed pizza. At 3.40 PM on the 18th of June, he was administered .025 mg of Curare via DSMO (as stabiliser).It was applied to the coating of a Pepsi bottle.
3.At the point of death he was beaten to the face to make it look like a mugging...He was then taken to his apt. and as he was in rigor mortis, he was placed on the toilet. He emptied his bowels in another location. The bowel was removed and disappeared. Autopsy serology will show Curare/DSMO in the cardio vascular sack.(peridenum)
The judge in Chicago died the same way Wilcher did. Judge Parsons was being primed and readied to accept a civil RICO filing.
We were scheduled for a filing 6 - 30 - 93. All documents have disappeared!!!
Several others have died because of these issues. Primary causes of death.
a. Bush/Russbacher video of the return flight from Paris in the SR-71.
b. Documents of the BCCI and BNL moves.
c. Audio tapes of interviews by CIA covert operations...65 tapes, 92 hours.
d. WACO and the CIA, Delta Group involvement.
RENO IS IN ALL OF IT!
The Wilcher Report was buried along with Paul Wilcher and for a while things went on as before, in other words the killings went on and on. Then in 1999 the Wilcher Report resurfaced, when Attorney General Janet Reno was told she expressed "total anger". According to unnamed eyewitnesses quoted in the Drudge Report: "Her face was flushed, she was clearly shaken."
In the following months the four Delta Force men died in "training accidents": to quote Paul Wilcher,"to silence their testimony forever."
Gennifer Flowers was a bit smarter. She had a 12 year affair with Clinton, in its aftermath her apartment was broken into and ransacked and she and her mother received threatening phone calls. Realising that she was in danger she assumed a higher profile, launched legal proceedings against Clinton and embarked on a series of media appearances. Smart girl, it was probably this that saved her life, had she not done so she too would have been on this list.
Finally it should be noted that this is only a partial list, for a more comprehensive picture we would refer you to some of the sources listed below.
Sources include: www.genniferflowers.com
Daniel Harris and Teresa Hampton,Capitol Hill Blue
Ambrose Pritchard-Evans writing in The Telegraph and the Sunday Telegraph.
The Drudge Report www.Sudden Instant death Syndrome
Extracted from the Seeker, PO Box 458, Devizes, Wiltshire, SN10 1UL, UK
Question: Would Bill crucify Christ all over again if he had the opportunity?
THE NEW WORLD ORDER & THE ALIEN DECEPTION
There is so much deception going on, especially in the UFO circles etc. This is how it appears to me, from what I have researched. Obviously, you need to make up your own mind. Also, you may know about some of this information.
Where does one start? On the one hand I don't wish to give too much information all at once as I came across all this gradually, but events are moving so fast now that there seems to be little time to present this piece-meal. Just take what you can and if possible keep an open mind about the rest.
Extra-terrestrials/aliens (i.e. not of this earth)
As we know, we live in a world of polarities, therefore there must also be positive and negative extraterrestrials (i.e. not of this earth). However, from what I have learned it would seem that at present the negative ones are not allowed to come here, as this planet is in enough trouble already, i.e. we are in a kind of quarantine. That doesn't mean that some didn't come here at sometime, but in my opinion we don't need to be afraid of an invasion from negative extraterrestrials. As you may have noticed, there is now a great deal of information coming out everywhere about aliens, mostly the frightening kind. Why? I have attempted to explain through this article.
On the positive side, I personally know that there are good extraterrestrials here in the Earth's atmosphere. They say they are simply messengers and teachers. Most importantly, they don't want our worship. To quote Hatonn (a spiritual being/extraterrestrial) "The greatest gift to a Cohan (Teacher) is to have a student learn his Truth - that only God and Being is in the place of reverence and honour. Not worship - respect and honour." I like to think of them as true friends. In reality they are no different from us, just more aware of who they are, i.e. spiritual beings, as are we.
Everything is connected, therefore they are naturally concerned about the state of this planet and how it could affect the rest of this universe.
Man-made UFO's
Information is available about these man-made craft. (See enclosed photocopied article "UFO's The Grand Deception & the Coming New World Order"), where Norio Hayakawa (who has done extensive research of Area 51 in the U.S.) says: "What is most important here, however, is the fact that local residents closest to those areas [of area 51] frequently have reported seeing strange strobes of lights as well as oval-shaped crafts of some kind darting in and out and around the facilities, often after sundown and especially during the wee hours of the morning." Also, from the same article: "...our subsequent joint expedition to the Nevada site in mid-May 1991 was not only successful but resulted in an unprecedented incident. Approximately 18 members of the joint team (including a reporter from a Japanese daily newspaper published in Los Angeles, Kashu Malniche (California Daily News) witnessed and documented a test flight of a strange, brilliantly-lit aerial craft moving silently above the Jumbled Hills early in the morning of May 16, 1991. It was the fifth joint expedition to the area. The videotape footage (a portion of which was shown on Channel 11 (FOX network) 10 p.m. News on October 18, 1991) shows the first early morning test flight of the unconventional aerial craft as it appeared exactly on schedule at 4.45 a.m. above the Jumbled Hills (from the direction of S-4 site), travelling towards the direction of Groom Lake. However, about an hour or so later, our caravan of seven cars (upon returning from the immediate area) was suddenly and brazenly pursued and dangerously harassed by an unmarked, dark military-type helicopter for more than 18 minutes or so...".
Also, extensive research has been done on this by Renato Vesco and David Hatcher Childress who co-wrote "Man-Made UFOS 1944-1994 - 50 Years of Suppression". To quote from the back cover: "This book gives a comprehensive and in-depth look at the early "flying saucer technology" of Nazi Germany and the genesis of early man-made UFOs from the captured German scientists to escaped battalions of Germans to secret communities in South America and Antarctica to today's state-of-the-art "Dreamland" flying machines. Heavily illustrated, it explains with technical diagrams the technology involved."
Genetic engineering
You may have heard about genetic engineering of food etc. We are told it is good for us and so on. It is now coming out that animal organs can be genetically engineered for transplanting into humans. Also, there was a very brief mention of "Identikit sheep" on TV AM news (in the U.K.) a few weeks ago, which was not repeated again so far as I know. Now, this may sound far fetched), but it is only a step further from this to cloning humans or anything from DNA structure. Including aliens (perhaps from crashed craft). When I first heard about this possibility, I thought, this is too way out. However, when one looks at the information about it, plus how it could work with the Elite's plans, it is a different story.
NASA Blue Beam Project
There is a project called "Blue Beam" (see enclosed photocopied information from 'Contact' newspaper dated September 3, 1996, entitled Nasa the Blue Beam Project). Holographic images (created via computers and satellites), are apparently to be flashed across the sky. The religious figure would differ depending where in the world it is seen and by whom. "ELF, VLF, LF waves, the accompanying sounds will be perceived as coming from everywhere."
It involves two things. A technologically simulated "second coming" and the reemmrgence of new "MONTAUK" type projects that have the ability to take up a whole bunch of people as in a "rapture" type of situation and whisk the whole bunch into never-never land. Ironically, portions of the holographic projections have the potential for changing the planet into oneness with God. Unfortunately, this operates on the premise that Man shall somehow become God in human form and control other Men and dictate all actions and thoughts.
The calculated resistance to the new religion, the New World Order and the new "Messiah" will entail human loss on a massive scale in the ensuing "holy wars".The "BLUE BEAM PROJECT" will pretend to be the universal fulfillment of the prophecies of old; as major an event as that which took place 2000 years ago. In principle, it will make use of the sky as a holographic projection screen for space-based laser-generating satellites (star wars). These projectors will project simultaneous images to the four corners of the planet, in every language by region. It deals with the religious aspect of the NEW WORLD ORDER.
The "system" has already been tested. Holographic projections of the "CHRIST IMAGE" have already been seen in some remote desert areas. These have only been reported in tabloid papers, so they are instantly rendered moot. They can also project images of alien craft, aliens, monsters, angels - you name it. Computers will coordinate the satellites and software will run the show-and-tell.
Hollography is based on very nearly identical signals combining to produce and image, or hologram, with depth perception. This is equally applicable to acoustic (ELF,VLF,LF) waves as it is to optical phenomena. Specifically, the "show" will consist of laser projections of multiple holographic images to different parts of the planet, each receiving different images according to the predominating regional religious faith. Not a single area will be excluded. With computer animation and sound effects appearing to come from the depths of space, astonished followers of the various creeds will witness their own returned Messiah in spectacularly convincing lifelike realness.
The various images of Christ, Mohammed, Buddha, Krishna, etc., will merge into ONE after "correct explanation" of the mysteries, prophecies and revelations are disclosed. This "ONE GOD" will in fact function as the "Anti-Christ", who will "explain" that the various scriptures "have been misunderstood"- that the religious of old are responsible for turning brother against brother, nation against nation - that the religions of the world must be abolished to make way for the GOLDEN AGE (NEW AGE) of the One World Religion, representing the One God they see before them. Naturally, this superbly staged, full-scale production will result in social and religious disorder on a massive scale. Wonder what the television transmitters of religious networks will be doing on that day ? But before all this, they have to go through four different steps in order to get to Project Blue Beam.
1: The first step concerns the breakdown of all archaological knowledge. It deals with staging earthquakes at certain precise locations around the planet where supposed new "discoveries" will finally explain (for them) that the meanings of the basic doctrines of all the world`s major religions are "wrong." This falsification will be used to make the population believe that all religious doctrine has been misunderstood and misinterpreted. The falsification started with the film 2001: A Space Odessy, the TV-series STAR TREK, the STAR WARS films, E.T., all of which deal with space "invasion" and "protection". JURASSIC PARK, was to push the theory of evolution. 2: The second step deals with the gigantic space show: 3D optical holograms and sounds, laser projections of multiple holographic images in different parts of the world, each receiving a different image, according to its predetermined original national religious faith. This new "god" image will talk in all languages. As an exemple, the Soviets have manufactured the advanced computers and have programmed them with the minute psychological particles based upon their studies of the anatomy and biology of the human body, as well as their studies on the anatomy, chemistry and electricity of the humain brain. These computers have also been fed with the different languages of the world.
3: The third step deals with telepathic electronic two-way communication, where ELF(Extra Low Frequency), VLF (Very Low Frequency), and LF (Low Frequency) waves will reach the people of the earth through the insides of their brains, making each person believe that his own God is speaking to him from within his owm soul. Such rays, from satellite, are fed from the memory of computers that store much data about the human being and his languages. These rays will then interlace and interweave with the natural thinking processes to form what we call the ARTIFICIAL TALK.
4: The fourth step involves universal supernatural manifestations using electronic means. This step contains three different orientations: The first one is to make mankind believe that an alien invasion is about to occur upon every major city on the earth. This is to push each major nation into using its nuclear capability to strike back. In this manner, it would put each of these nations in a state of full disarmament before the United Nations after the false attack.
The second is to make the "christian" believe that a major rapture is occurring, with a simple "played" divine imtervention of an alleged "good" alien force coming to save the good people from a brutal satanic attack. Its goal is to get rid of all significant opposition to the NEW WORLD ORDER.
The third orientation is a mixture of electronic and supernatural forces. The waves (frequencies) used at that time will allow supernatural forces to travel through fiber optics cable, coaxial cable,electric and telephone lines in order to penetrate all electronic equipment and appliances that will by then all have a special microship installed.
The goal of this step deals with the materialization of satanic ghosts, spectres, and poltergeists all across the globe in order to push all populations to the edge of a wave of suicide, killing and permanent psychological disorder.
After that night of the THOUSAND STARS, HUMANITY IS BELIEVED TO BE READY FOR THEM TO ENTER IN A "NEW MESSIAH" TO REESTABLISH PEACE EVERYWHERE AT ANY COST, EVEN AT THE COST OF FREEDOM...............
Alien invasion.
Looking at the above, one needs to ask why? The Elite, whom it would seem have an agenda towards world control surely would not be spending all this time and energy on something without a reason. I do feel strongly that the Elite are working at creating fear in the populace towards aliens. One only has to look at the increased amount of films etc. about them, often frightening aliens. You may have noticed films about alien invasions. To explain to the populace that we are under threat of an alien invasion, could well be a way to bring the world more easily together under a New World Order.
Alien abductions
If aliens have indeed been cloned (and I believe this can include their natural telepathic abilities as well) it is quite possible that abductees are meeting these cloned aliens with man-made craft and/or receiving a powerful hypnotic suggestion. As regards the implants that abductees have had implanted - it is well known that the Elite are working on 'microchipping' to find missing children etc. Perhaps this is just a step or two up from that? Also, there is so much going on in the scientific field which is kept secret from the populace. I have read, and this makes sense to me, that higher, and Godly, intelligences never abduct against an individual's will, there is always a prior agreement at soul level, sometimes before coming into this life. This would be for some work or mission to be accomplished. Whilst the Elite's agenda may be subtle with some impressive techniques and equipment, it is far from Godly - as power and control is it's hidden agenda.
Ascension/Ascended Masters
As you know, there is a good deal of channelled information, purported to be coming from Ascended Masters. From what I have noticed - and is so often the case nowadays, it looks like some good teachings/information is being intermingled with some disinformation. I particularly include the New Age movement. As regards the Ascension idea, from what I have read (from The Crystal Stair) it looks as though there is to be an ascension of the '144,000' and the three (different) waves, i.e. 3rd to 4th, 4th to 5th and 5th to 6th dimensions. Quoting from The Crystal Stair by Eric Klein (p.56): ".....144,000 is mentioned [in the Keys of Enoch] as being a general estimate of the number of Starseeds or ascended beings who are here at this time.". And on p.40: Beginning with a question: 'Is the ascension process the same as what is described in the Bible as 'People will be taken up into the air,' especially as described by the Christians that mis-interpret the Bible about speaking in toughns which the Greek translation means another language, therefor an interpreter was needed. (The Penticostal movement) began the teaching in the early to mid 1800's. A doctrine of man?'. Sananda: 'Yes, the event that they are speaking of in Revelation is the last wave or the final evacuation process. The way it appears to occur to the innocent bystander is that the person next to you on the bus has just disappeared. And so it says that two people will be sitting together and one will be taken and the other will not. So this is more in reference to the final evacuation. It is the same process that you will undergo. You will be lifted'." (This works conveniently with the Elite's 'Blue Beam' project, as discussed below).
To quote from a Phoenix journal entitled: Ascension or Never Ever Land: "....how does one just ascend? Ascension itself means becoming lighter in weight and frequency as to allow for passage through the density of Earth into higher and less-dense atmosphere or space. This means reaching the point and frequency of "at the least" invisibility through disbursement OR the frequency of illumination (light) or faster than a speeding bullet and only slightly slower than the speed of thought." Again, quoting from the same journal (p.98) "...surprising as it may be to the bunches of 'channels' who tout good old Ashtar as a dashing whiffer-awayer - he will only be involved if the world is set to totally disintegrate and disperse souled energy. Ashtar is 'a command' - a computer centre connection - which comes into play only if final evacuation has to be accomplished." You may have heard evangelists speak of the 'Rapture'. Apparently this is where God just comes to the clouds and we all just float up there, with Christ, on the clouds. (By the way, "clouds" properly translated from Greek is "a large gathering of people")
The word rapture is not mentioned in the bible anywhere. A tradition of man.
Excerpted from:
The Incredible Cover-up, pp. 151-157
By Dave MacPherson
APPENDIX A: MARGARET MACDONALD'S ACCOUNT
[This is Margaret Macdonald's handwritten account of her 1830 Pre-Trib revelation, as included in Robert Norton's Memoirs of James & George Macdonald of Port-Glasgow (1840), pp. 171-176. The italicized portions represent her account as it appears in shorter form in Norton's The Restoration of Apostles and Prophets; In the Catholic Apostolic Church (1861), pp 15-18.]
"It was first the awful state of the land that was pressed upon me.(1) I saw the blindness and infatuation of the people to be very great. I felt the cry of Liberty just to be the hiss of the serpent, to drown them in perdition. It was just `no God.' I repeated the words, Now there is distress of nations, with perplexity, the seas and the waves roaring, men's hearts failing them for fear - now look out for the sign of the Son of man. Here I was made to stop and cry out, 0 it is not known what the sign of the Son of man is; the people of God think they are waiting, but they know not what it is. I felt this needed to be revealed, and that there was great darkness and error about it; but suddenly what it was burst upon me with a glorious light I saw it was just the Lord himself descending from Heaven with a shout, just the glorified man. even Jesus; but that all must, as Stephen was, be filled with the Holy Ghost, that they might look up, and see the brightness of the Father's glory. I saw the error to be, that men think that it will be something seen by the natural eye; but 'tis spiritual discernment that is needed, the eye of God in his people. Many passages were revealed, in a light in which I had not before seen them. I repeated, `Now is the kingdom of Heaven like unto ten virgins, who went forth to meet the Bridegroom, five wise and five foolish; they that were foolish took their lamps, but took no oil with them; but they that were wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.' 'But be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is; and be not drunk with wine wherein is excess, but be filled with the Spirit.' This was the oil the wise virgins took in their vessels - this is the light to be kept burning - the light of God - that we may discern that which cometh not with observation to the natural eye. Only those who have the light of God within them will see the sign of his appearance. No need to follow them who say, see here, or see there, for his day shall be a s the lightning to those in whom the living Christ is. 'Tis Christ in us that will lift us up - he is the light - 'tis only those that are alive in him that will be caught up to meet him in the air. I saw that we must be in the Spirit, that we might see spiritual things. John was in the Spirit, when he saw a throne set in Heaven. - But I saw that the glory o f the ministration of the Spirit had not been known. I repeated frequent ly, but the spiritual temple must and shall be reared, and the fulness o f Christ be poured into his body, and then shall we be caught up to meet him. Oh none will be counted worthy of this calling but his body, which is the church, and which must be a candlestick all of gold. I often said, Oh the glorious inbreaking of God which is now about to burst on this earth; Oh the glorious temple which is now about to be reared, the bride adorned for her husband; and Oh what a holy, holy bride she must be, to be prepared for such a glorious bridegroom. I said, Now shall the people of God have to do with realities - now shall the glorious mystery of God in our nature be known- now shall it be known what it is for man to be glorified. I felt that the revelation of Jesus Christ had yet to be opened up - it is not knowledge about God that it contains, but it is an entering into God - I saw that there was a glorious breaking in of God to be. I feIt as Elijah surrounded with chariots of fire. I saw as it we re, the spiritual temple reared, and the Head Stone brought forth with shoutings of grace, grace, unto it. It was a glorious light above the brightness of the sun, that shone round about me. I felt that those who were filled with the spirit could see spiritual things, and feel walking in the midst of them, while those who had not the Spirit could see nothing - so that two shall be in one bed, the one taken and the other left, be cause the one has the light of God within while the other cannot see the Kingdom of Heaven. I saw the people of God in an awfully dangerous situation, surrounded by nets and entanglements, about to be tried, and many about to be deceived and fall. Now will THE WICKED be revealed, with all power and signs and lying wonders, so that if it were possible the very elect will be deceived. - This is the fiery trial which is to try us. - It will be for the purging and purifying of the real members of the bo dy of Jesus; but Oh it will be a fiery trial. Every soul will be shaken to the very center. The enemy will try to shake in every thing we have believed - But the trial of real faith will be found to honour and praise and glory. Nothing but what is of God will stand. The stony-ground hearers will be made manifest - the love of many will wax cold I frequently said that night, and often since, now shall the awful sight of a false Christ be seen on this earth. and nothing but the living Christ in us can detect this awful attempt of the enemy to deceive - or it is with all deceivableness of unrighteousness he will work - he will have a counter part for every part of God's truth and an imitation for every work of the Spirit. The Spirit must and will be poured out on the church, that she m ay be purified and filled with God - and just in proportion as the Spirit of God works, so will he when our Lord anoints men with power, so will he. This is particularly the nature of the trial, through which those a re to pass who will be counted worthy to stand before the Son of man. There will be outward trial too, but `tis principally temptation. It is brought on by the outpouring of the Spirit, and will just increase in proportion as the Spirit is poured out. The trial of the Church is from Anti christ. It is by being filled with the Spirit that we shall be kept. I frequently said, Oh be filled with the Spirit - have the light of God in you, that you may detect satan - be full of eyes within - be clay in the hands of the potter - submit to be filled, filled with God This will build the temple. It is not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit saith the Lord. This will fit us to enter into the marriage supper of the lamb . I saw It to be the will of God that all should be filled. But what hindered the real life of God from being received by his people, was their turning from Jesus. who is the way to the Father. They were not entering in by the door. For he is faithful who hath said, by me if any man enter in he shall find pasture. They were passing the cross, through which e very drop of the Spirit of God flows to us. All power that comes not through the blood of Christ is not of God. When I say, they are looking from the cross, I feel that there is much in it - they turn from the blood of the Lamb, by which we overcome, and in which our robes are washed and made white. There are low views of God's holiness, and ceasing to condemn sin in the flesh, and a looking from him who humbled himself, and made himself of no reputation. Oh! it is needed, much needed at present, a leading back to the cross, I saw that night, and often since, that there will be an outpouring of the Spirit on the body, such as has not been, a baptism of fire, that all the dross may be put away. Oh there must and will be such an indwelling of the living God as has not been - the servants of God sealed in their foreheads - great conformity to Jesus - his holy holy image seen in his people just the bride made comely, by his comeliness put upon her. This is what we are at present made to pray much for, that speedily we may all be made ready to meet our Lord in the air - and it will be. Jesus wants his bride. His desire is toward us. He that shall come, will come, and will not tarry. Amen and Amen. Even so come Lord Jesus." Now you have the truth about the "rapture plot."
NOTES
1. At the end of this first sentence Norton adds a footnote which is explained at the bottom of p. 171: "I think I ought not to omit stating that in the course of the memorable evening of which the above paper is a very incomplete outline, one individual was expressly mentioned by name as the future desolater of this land, who at the time (nine years ago) wa s not at a11 pre-eminent as the leader of infidelity, but who has so notoriously and awfully become so - Mr. Owen." The Owen referred to was Robert Owen (1771-1858), described by Friedrich Engels in his Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880) as one of the leading socialists of the earl y nineteenth century. A lengthy article on "Tracing the History of Communes" says Owen established a number the editorial page of the January 10 , 1973, Kansas City Star entitled of communities that were Communistic i n nature. He set up communes in Ireland and Britain; his best-known commune, however, was his American community at New Harmony. Indiana. Margaret, on the same evening she had her pre-trib revelation, mentioned Owen as the future desolater, or Antichrist.
Copyright 1975 by Logos International, All Rights Reserved.
All Rights transferred to:
Omega Publications
P.O. Box 4130
Medford, Oregon 97501
Second Printing 1980.
This Appendix was reprinted with the permission of Omega Publications.
"The Incredible Cover-up" is available for $7.00 by writing Omega
Publications, 1-800-345-0175.
To quote from Little Crow, a Dakota/Lakota on " a Heathen Transition" (whose intent is to preserve and protect the oral tradition): "Ain't none of us going to hell, ain't none of us going to heaven. What we are doing is going into the infinity of our being, the infinity of our creation, which is energy - energy and that's it. Energy has always existed, always shall exist ..... and will continue to exist whether we have that realisation or not...." and "In my culture there is no hell, which is a plus. There is no damnation, which is a plus, and there is no salvation - only life. You transist and you live it again and you transist and you live it again .... until one day you don't have to transist anymore." (Ascension?)
Looking at all the above, I now want to turn again to the photocopied information from 'Contact' newspaper, September 3, 1996 where they quote from New Monitor, No. 12, Vol. 4/4); " 'The NASA Blue Beam Project' ": 'That project is the ability to take up a whole bunch of people as in a 'rapture' type of situation and whisk the whole bunch into never-never land. The calculated resistance to the New Religion, the New World Order (NWO) and the New 'Messiah' will be human loss on a massive scale in the ensuing 'Holy Wars'." It looks highly possible to me that 'ascension' as being put out by the New Age teachings and 'rapture' by the evangelists etc. is an ideal opportunity to be used to the advantage of the Elite's agenda.
To be fair, there are many interesting and helpful teachings in The Crystal Stair. It is a matter of discernment and taking those helpful points and discarding the rest. Also, I am aware that this planet is evolving into a higher frequency, often termed as the 4th dimension Obviously, this will affect the frequency vibration of all life involved with this planet - which is my idea of ascension.
One World Religion is the Elite's ultimate plan!
I am fairly certain that a one world religion is planned under the New World Order. How convenient to have the Blue Beam project showing the various religious figures around the world. Then to discredit them and bring in a One World Religion.
Prophecies/Armageddon etc.
As you know certain prophecies were recorded in the Bible (Revelations, Armageddon etc.). It is my opinion that the Elite are working with these prophecies to further their New World Order agenda. To explain the above happenings as part of Armageddon etc. Of course, if enough people believe Armageddon is going to happen then it will sooner than planed. However, if enough individuals write another script, another ending, it could be different. Also, of course, we create our own reality, so within the world scenario we can create our own situation.
Lastly, I like what David Icke has to say about our situation of world control. What does it say about us? We have gone to sleep and allowed it to happen. So conversely we can wake up and change it.
I do hope all this hasn't blown your mind, as it were - but has been of some interest. When I come across something that I cannot believe or disbelieve I keep an open mind on it, then if the actual scenario happens at least I have some background, something to judge it by, without being so fearful of it. Knowledge is power, providing it is applied in accordance with Universal Truth or Reality. And for those of you that may get bored with the phone talk about 9/11, just go to the next subject after it: The US had already planed the Afghan attack long before 9/11 WTC bombing took place. And Bin Laden knew it too! Enter here and read transcript of telephone conversations during attack. It looks like our friends and enemies know more about American secret technology than even we Americans do! FBI Investigates Foreign Spy Ring –
U.S. Companies Deny Involvement
In the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the FBI reportedly stumbled on an espionage ring that had penetrated the wiretapping system of U.S. law enforcement. Fox News Channel reported that the FBI was holding nearly 100 Israeli citizens with direct ties to foreign military, criminal and intelligence services.
In a follow-up to these reports, the FBI did not deny that such actions had been taken. However, FBI spokesman Paul Bresson would not answer specific questions on the reported espionage.
"We have seen the Fox News segments that aired several weeks ago on this topic and found some inaccuracies with it. Because they are sensitive issues, I do not have the luxury of discussing what precisely was accurate and what was inaccurate about their reporting," stated Paul Bresson, spokesman for the FBI.
"Most of the questions [asked by NewsMax.com] are not directly answerable by CALEA [Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act]. Your questions may be more properly addressed to our National Security Division, which I know would never discuss this with you, unfortunately," stated Bresson.
Employees of U.S. Companies Reportedly Involved
The espionage operation reportedly includes employees of two companies that perform official wiretaps for U.S. local, state and federal law enforcement: Comverse Infosys and Amdocs. Official spokesman for both companies denied any involvement in the alleged espionage ring.
"Amdocs is unaware of any investigation or allegations and has not been contacted by any agency," stated Dan Ginsberg, of the PR firm Porter Novelli, for Amdocs.
"Amdocs has not been involved in any illegal or improper activity," said Ginsberg flatly.
"We know of absolutely no factual basis for suggestions that intelligence agencies or others have misused our products for illicit purposes," stated Paul Baker, spokesman for Comverse.
"In particular, no company employees have been involved in any of the incidents referred to in your December 19 story. Moreover, the reference in that story to a suspected abuse of our equipment in a foiled Los Angeles drug bust was completely erroneous. Our equipment was not involved in any such incident," said Baker.
"Comverse Technology is a New York–based corporation that has been publicly traded for 15 years. It is an S&P 500 and a NASDAQ-100 Index company that has won a worldwide leadership position in telecommunications," noted Baker.
"More than 10 years ago, Comverse established Comverse Infosys Technology as a separate subsidiary to meet the monitoring applications needs of some U.S. customers. This group maintains the high-level security clearances these customers require," said Baker.
"In full compliance with U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) regulations, this subsidiary's operations are completely segregated from all other Comverse businesses and are insulated from any foreign influence," said Baker.
"The board of directors overseeing these operations consists of former high-level military officers, including two retired Air Force generals appointed by the DOD. In addition, the DOD monitors Comverse Infosys Technology's operations to ensure they remain in full regulatory compliance.
"All equipment supplied by Comverse complies with all applicable government security requirements. The notion that 'backdoor' access has been built into the systems is absurd. For more than 10 years, these systems have been sold to customers in more than 40 countries, who have subjected them to rigorous and continuous security testing without a single reported breach," said Baker.
"As with any computer equipment that sits on a network, the Comverse systems are protected by the security measures and access restrictions imposed by the user of the network, whether a government agency or telephone operator. We fully support the evolving CALEA standard, and remain committed to maintaining our industry leadership in providing secure and reliable systems," concluded Baker.
FBI Response Raises Questions
Despite the extensive denials by Amdocs and Comverse, the curious response by the FBI has raised more questions than answers. Sources inside Capitol Hill are investigating the allegations and made no comments on the allegations of espionage at this time. However, the demands for answers continued to grow outside political circles.
"If national security is the overriding issue in the FBI's treatment of this case, the correct response to your questions should have been 'Sorry, we have no comment at this time,'" said Douglas Brown of the Nathan Hale Institute.
"Of course, the most reassuring response would have been 'There's no truth to the stories,' but apparently the bureau can't say that. Maybe the spokesperson is well-informed?" questioned Brown.
"Something is up. One of the things that gave the Fox report added credibility was 'investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse is considered career suicide.' I think it pretty much captures the bizzaro world U.S. law enforcement and intelligence continues to operate in during the post-Clinton years," said Brown.
"Everything is opposite still in their world, since the Clintonistas still control it. The more you screw up, the higher you go. Forget 'The West Wing' and 'The Agency' type shows, 'Seinfeld' reruns do a better job of capturing reality in D.C.," said Brown.
"If the Israelis have used the companies named in the Fox reports for intelligence purposes, it lies somewhere between the Liberty incident and Jonathan Pollard affair for outrageousness. Yet, if true, one has to admire the creativity and ingenuity of Israeli intelligence," said Brown.
Are Israeli Spies in the U.S.?
"First, they have taken advantage of a technically bumbling and compromised law enforcement and counterintelligence community and may have essentially made U.S. law enforcement wiretapping activities a branch of Israeli intelligence. It would be quite impressive if true," noted Brown.
"They have used their technical expertise in-house to identify and exploit cutting-edge technologies and companies. In gaining control over those technologies and companies, they would also have shown a deft handling of merger and acquisitions, personnel recruitment, and playing the capital markets.
"In addition, as publicly traded companies, private and institutional investors from around the world would be funding Israeli intelligence activities. Again, pretty impressive, if true, and really pretty much the model, or a variation of the model, now used by the intelligence agencies of China, Russia and some of our European allies," said Brown.
"If they [the Fox reports] do turn out to expose Israeli intelligence operations, one's admiration for Israeli ingenuity would be more than tempered by amazement at the sheer stupidity and recklessness of the Israelis' actions," noted Brown.
"First, they would have seriously damaged their relationship with the United States on many levels. Since that relationship is fundamental to Israel's existence, not a smart move.
"Second, while Israel, like the prodigal son, will always be able to ultimately rely on America's protection, Israeli high-tech companies are a major target for Russian intelligence and organized crime," stated Brown.
Damage to U.S.-Israeli Relations
"The prodigal son may have left our back door open to some of the most dangerous people in our global village. In other words, Israeli ingenuity in infiltrating and exploiting the U.S. high-tech industry may be seriously undermining the security and power of the country that is, in fact, the ultimate guarantor of its existence. Again, not a smart move," said Brown.
"Finally, if the Israelis are using such a modus operandus for penetrating U.S. high-tech companies and government agencies, it is not a method of operation appropriate or necessary for a close ally to engage in. The risk of backlash and recriminations are much too great. Russian and Chinese use of such methods is understandable and a natural evolution and outgrowth of intelligence operations conducted for decades, but Israel should adhere more closely to the more open and, unfortunately, usually perfectly legal methods used by allies like Japan," stated Brown.
"It looks like Louis Freeh may have another chapter to write in his memoirs – right after the Hanssen chapter," concluded Brown.
U.S. May Help Chinese Biowarfare Labs
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2001
Before the Second World War, Imperial Japan established Unit 731 under the command of Lt. Gen. Shiro Ishii. Ishii and his Unit 731 entered China with one purpose: develop and deploy biological weapons of mass destruction.
Unit 731 operations included poisoning wells in test villages, dropping plague-infested fleas from planes and spraying whole areas with anthrax. By the end of the war, Unit 731 produced a stockpile of more than 200 kilograms of anthrax and developed aerial bombs to disperse the deadly disease over wide areas.
In addition, Ishii's Unit 731 established a test center inside an Allied POW camp in Mukden China. Unit 731 killed hundreds of American prisoners, using them as live targets for biological test weapons.
During his tenure in China, Ishii killed an estimated 200,000 Chinese civilians using plague, anthrax and germ weapons. Gen. Tojo and Emperor Hirohito personally approved Ishii's operations. Ishii, his men and the emperor were never charged with war crimes.
After Sept. 11, 2001, the world turned upside down. China is the only nation bordering Afghanistan that does not support the allied efforts. Even Iran, a longtime foe of the United States, has quietly assisted American authorities with intelligence data.
Yet, China is not listed nor mentioned in any dispatch by official U.S. government sources as supporting the global effort to stop the reign of terror. The new diplomacy between Washington and Beijing is seen as a bribe to convince the communist regime to at least not oppose the campaign along its western border.
News sources report that U.S. State Department officials are seeking to relax sanctions against China in an effort to enlist Beijing's aid in the war on terrorism. The sanctions, imposed on Beijing after nuclear-tipped M-11 missiles were exported to Pakistan, halted the exports of supercomputers sold to suspected military facilities inside China.
Documentation, obtained using the Freedom of Information Act, shows that in 1997 U.S. Commerce officials approved supercomputer exports to Chinese weapons labs without an end use inspection.
In December 1997, U.S. Commerce officials sought permission to inspect Xian Jiatong University prior to the export of a high-performance computer made by Digital Corp. (DEC). American inspectors wanted to verify the Chinese university was not using the computer for weapons research. Instead, all efforts to inspect the site were denied by the PRC government.
In a letter written to Liu Hu, director general for science and technology of MOFTEC (Ministry of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation), U.S. Commerce Department officials noted that they were not given permission to perform the license check.
"We were disappointed at MOFTEC's decision not to allow an on-site end use check and refusal to permit an Embassy representative to travel to Xian Jiatong University at the university's invitation... Because we were unable to work through MOFTEC, we gathered information on the end-user through other sources and have approved the license."
The December 1997 letter to MOFTEC's Liu Hu reminded the Chinese government that it had signed a treaty allowing U.S. representatives to do a "post" export inspection. However, U.S. Commerce officials were reduced to seeking "help" from the Chinese communist government in performing the inspections and sought another meeting to discuss the issue.
In January 1998 the Commerce Department again contacted the Chinese government, seeking approval for verification inspections. The Commerce Department arranged for Bureau of Export Administration Chief Counsel Hoyt Zia to meet with China's MOFTEC to discuss the denied checks on U.S.-made supercomputers.
U.S. Customs Service officials also requested that they attend the January meeting. U.S. Customs Service officer David Brenner asked Commerce Official Mark Bayuk if he could attend the meeting.
Bayuk wrote in a e-mail to Commerce official Matthew Borman, "I told him rather flatly and abruptly, no." Bayuk described Customs Service officer Brenner as "not happy" because Bayuk felt that Customs had no reason to attend the January meeting.
Commerce counsel Hoyt Zia's meeting in January 1998 with China's MOFTEC official, Zhou Ruojun, failed to obtain Chinese permission for the inspections. Commerce documentation of the meeting noted that the Chinese denied all end use supercomputer inspection checks. Chinese MOFTEC officials argued that there "was no formal agreement between the two governments on conducting these checks."
The Chinese delegation also claimed that a 1983 U.S. trade letter agreeing to the checks "was unsigned" in the Commerce December 1997 complaint letter. MOFTEC's Zhou considered the matter "inappropriate" because the letter was unsigned. U.S. officials dropped the inspection issue "rather than engage in a fruitless discussion of the U.S.-side's 'understanding' of the 'intent' of the signed exchange of letters."
The Chinese diplomatic stall also continued for pre-export verification inspections as well. MOFTEC representative Zhou stated that she was "not in a position to talk too much about this." The Commerce document notes "she was unwilling to discuss this [pre-license inspection] issue any further."
Pentagon sources state that Xian Jiatong University is a center for the Chinese army's biological and chemical warfare research. Xian is one of the China's super-key universities directly under the State Education Commission. There are more than 1,000 such universities in China, but Xian Jiatong is one of only 10 sites included in Chinese army-sponsored construction projects.
Xian Jiatong University is located in the remote northwest corner of China near the city of Xian, the site of the underground Terra-Cotta Army of the First Qin Emperor. Xian is also a known location of Chinese Army weapons manufacturing sites such as the Xian Aircraft design bureau, which makes China's H-6 nuclear strike bombers.
The Xian Jiatong sale is the only known U.S. super-computer export associated with Chinese biological and chemical warfare. However, Beijing is known to have more than 1,000 U.S.-made supercomputers at work inside PLA weapon labs.
Pentagon sources are convinced that the Chinese army is using the supercomputer to develop a chemical cluster "bomblet" munition to arm missiles and bombers. Instead of a single warhead, a bomblet warhead would disperse hundreds of miniature biotoxin-filled grenades each filled with a deadly payload over a vast area.
The short-term efforts by the present U.S. administration to bribe Beijing into being a good global citizen are misguided and dangerous. The temptation to enlist China's good will with advanced technology exports overwhelmed the last administration. The result transformed the Chinese army's nuclear weapons labs into state-of-the-art facilities. We cannot afford to make the same mistake again.
Before World War II, China suffered directly under the bio-bomb. Chinese authorities erected a museum in Harbin where Unit 731 engaged in its deadly experiments on living subjects.
The present-day efforts by Beijing to improve on the horrific science of death started so long ago by Imperial Japanese Gen. Ishii is living testimony to the foolishness of mankind.
=======================================
Threat of US strikes passed to Taliban weeks before NY attack as stated by well known international investigative reporters herein.
Jonathan Steele, Ewen MacAskill, Richard Norton-Taylor and Ed Harriman
Saturday September 22, 2001
The Guardian
Osama bin Laden and the Taliban received threats of possible American military strikes against them two months before the terrorist assaults on New York and Washington, which were allegedly masterminded by the Saudi-born fundamentalist, a Guardian investigation has established.
The threats of war unless the Taliban surrendered Osama bin Laden were passed to the regime in Afghanistan by the Pakistani government, senior diplomatic sources revealed to us.
The Taliban refused to comply but the serious nature of what they were told raises the possibility that Bin Laden, far from launching the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon out of the blue 10 days ago, was launching a pre-emptive strike in response to what he saw as US threats.
The warning to the Taliban originated at a four-day meeting of senior Americans, Russians, Iranians and Pakistanis at a hotel in Berlin in mid-July. The conference, the third in a series dubbed "brainstorming on Afghanistan", was part of a classic diplomatic device known as "track two".
It was designed to offer a free and open-ended forum for governments to pass messages and sound out each other's thinking. Participants were experts with long diplomatic experience of the region who were no longer government officials but had close links with their governments.
"The Americans indicated to us that in case the Taliban does not behave and in case Pakistan also doesn't help us to influence the Taliban, then the United States would be left with no option but to take an overt action against Afghanistan," said Niaz Naik, a former foreign minister of Pakistan, who was at the meeting.
"I told the Pakistani government, who informed the Taliban via our foreign office and the Taliban ambassador here."
The three Americans at the Berlin meeting were Tom Simons, a former US ambassador to Pakistan, Karl "Rick" Inderfurth, a former assistant secretary of state for south Asian affairs, and Lee Coldren, who headed the office of Pakistan, Afghan and Bangladesh affairs in the state department until 1997.
According to Mr Naik, the Americans raised the issue of an attack on Afghanistan at one of the full sessions of the conference, convened by Francesc Vendrell, a Spanish diplomat who serves as the UN secretary general's special representative on Afghanistan. In the break afterwards, Mr Naik told the Guardian yesterday, he asked Mr Simons why the attack should be more successful than Bill Clinton's missile strikes on Afghanistan in 1998, which caused 20 deaths but missed Bin Laden.
"He said this time they were very sure. They had all the intelligence and would not miss him this time. It would be aerial action, maybe helicopter gunships, and not only overt, but from very close proximity to Afghanistan. The Russians were listening to the conversation but not participating."
Asked whether he could be sure that the Americans were passing ideas from the Bush administration rather than their own views, Mr Naik said yesterday: "What the Americans indicated to us was perhaps based on official instructions. They were very senior people. Even in 'track two' people are very careful about what they say and don't say."
In the room at the time were not only the Americans, Russians and Pakistanis but also a team from Iran headed by Saeed Rajai Khorassani, a former Iranian envoy to the UN. Three Pakistani generals, one still on active service, attended the conference. Giving further evidence of the fact that the Berlin meeting was designed to influence governments, the UN invited official representatives of both the Taliban government in Kabul and the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. Dr Abdullah Abdullah, the Northern Alliance's foreign minister, attended. The Taliban declined to send a representative.
The Pakistani government took the US talk of possible strikes seriously enough to pass it on to the Taliban. Pakistan is one of only three governments to recognise the Taliban.
Mr Coldren confirmed the broad outline of the American position at the Berlin meeting yesterday. "I think there was some discussion of the fact that the United States was so disgusted with the Taliban that they might be considering some military action." The three former US diplomats "based our discussion on hearsay from US officials", he said. It was not an agenda item at the meeting "but was mentioned just in passing".
Nikolai Kozyrev, Moscow's former special envoy on Afghanistan and one of the Russians in Berlin, would not confirm the contents of the US conversations, but said: "Maybe they had some discussions in the corridor. I don't exclude such a possibility."
Mr Naik's recollection is that "we had the impression Russians were trying to tell the Americans that the threat of the use of force is sometimes more effective than force itself".
The Berlin conference was the third convened since November last year by Mr Vendrell. As a UN meeting, its official agenda was confined to trying to find a negotiated solution to the civil war in Afghanistan, ending terrorism and heroin trafficking, and discussing humanitarian aid.
Mr Simons denied having said anything about detailed operations. "I've known Niaz Naik and considered him a friend for years. He's an honourable diplomat. I didn't say anything like that and didn't hear anyone else say anything like that. We were clear that feeling in Washington was strong, and that military action was one of the options down the road. But details, I don't know where they came from."
The US was reassessing its Afghan policy under the new Bush administration at the time of the July meeting, according to Mr Simons. "It was clear that the trend of US government policy was widening. People should worry, Taliban, Bin Laden ought to worry - but the drift of US policy was to get away from single issue, from concentrating on Bin Laden as under Clinton, and get broader."
Mr Inderfurth said: "There was no suggestion for military force to be used. What we discussed was the need for a comprehensive political settlement to bring an end to the war in Afghanistan, that has been going on for two decades, and has been doing so much damage."
The Foreign Office confirmed the significance of the Berlin discussions. "The meeting was a bringing together of Afghan factions and some interested states and we received reports from several participants, including the UN," it said.
Asked if he was surprised that the American participants were denying the details they mentioned in Berlin, Mr Naik said last night: "I'm a little surprised but maybe they feel they shouldn't have told us anything in advance now we have had these tragic events".
Russia's president Vladimir Putin said in an interview released yesterday that he had warned the Clinton administration about the dangers posed by Bin Laden. "Washington's reaction at the time really amazed me. They shrugged their shoulders and said matter-of-factly: 'We can't do anything because the Taliban does not want to turn him over'." Now we have Good Versus Evil
We are facing a battle of civilization versus one thousand years of darkness. Now if you think I am being extreme and not politically correct enough, you're mistaken. A very hard line was even taken by the liberal Washington Post. It says, "A state of war also means a national commitment. Nurtured by bipartisan cooperation in Washington to attack and defeat the countries enemies. This means more than merely tracking down and arresting individual suspects."
Amen, Amen!
I don't want to hear about them being brought to justice. I want to hear about carpet bombing! This means more than merely tracking down and arresting individual suspects. When I watched Colin Powell speak, I felt the man should be holding onto a velvet rope at the Cotton Club. "What is wrong with these people," I said to myself? Where is the passion? Where is the emotion? Where is the banging on the podium? Where is the pointing of the fingers, saying "we will hunt you down, we will destroy you! All of you and all of yours!"
What is this about "bringing them to justice?" If you were a terrorist you would be laughing today. You would be laughing at the pitiful, helpless giant.
Nothing was done.
You see a nation where Congress yesterday gets up and sings "America the Beautiful." The best that our Congress can muster is a pathetic third grade rendition of "America the Beautiful." After which by the way, one of the most despicable scenes I have ever noticed in my life as an observer of politics occurred. I was astonished to watch Charles Schumer of New York, after the rendition of America the Beautiful, glad handing and slapping other members of congress on the back, smirking at them and doing deals.
You know, "you give me a highway here, I'll give you one there." I couldn't believe what I was watching. Business as usual, business as usual.
Well let me remind you of something. A new era has begun. The era of pornography, the era of Condit, the era of a masturbatory President is over. The era of skateboarders is over. The era of grown men riding around on bicycles with their butts in the air is over. You are facing your future. And this future is not assured.
There is a very good chance that we'll lose our freedom because of this political noose that we have been put in by the politically correct forces in America. They have corrected your mind to the point that you can't even point fingers. You can't even say what's on your lips. You don't know how to say the words Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Sudan, and Libya. You don't know how to ask, "do we have proper war leaders?" A New era has begun, ladies and gentlemen of the Nation. It's an era of good versus evil. It is that clear. We are the good ones and they are the evil ones. They must be snuffed out from the planet, and not in a court of law. Even the Washington Post is calling for an international alliance to eliminate, and I am quoting them now, "eliminate all sources of support for the terrorist networks that would wage war on the United States." That's right ladies and gentlemen. The era of Lewinsky and Condit is over. The e-boom is over. The city of New York was smashed to the ground. The Pentagon was ruptured.
There is another alarming situation. It took our Air Force one hour to scramble fighter jets. What does that mean? It means that everything is in the wrong order of events.
Let me explain.
After the two jets were smashed into the World Trade Center Towers, it took our Air Force one hour to get jets up in the air. What would have happened in a country like Israel, which has been on war footing for a very long time is this; immediately, within minutes, Israeli warplanes would have been airborne. And they would have been able to shoot down that plane that was heading for the Pentagon.
America is beautiful. But we must implore that President Bush rid himself of his new-found advisors. That he rid our government of all the ivy-league liberals, the hold-overs from the degenerate Clinton-era.
It's a new world, that needs a new order. Reaching the parts other empires could not reach!
In return for security in the region, the US will snap up central Asia's oil
January 1, 2002
The United States is engaged in a strategic power grab in central Asia of epic proportions. In previous eras, this sort of expansionism would have been called colonialism or imperialism. It would be portrayed as a dutiful mission to civilise the less fortunate of the world or as a legitimate expression, perhaps, of America's manifest destiny. Now it is simply called the "war against terrorism".
If moral justification were required, there is no need, it seems, to look beyond Ground Zero. Current American certitude of the rightness of its cause is as unshakeable as that of any Victorian missionary society or Palmerstonian gunboat skipper.
Ideologically, the US case appears - to many in the US, at any rate - to be equally unanswerable. Freedom, democracy, security and free trade are the supreme gifts bestowed upon those who acknowledge Washington's tutelage. And are these not the great, universal shibboleths of our time? Proselytising hawks within the Bush administration and Republican party certainly believe so. They see no good reason why any country should be denied such felicity and are determined to extend these benefits to all.
Even if such considerations are set aside, the war in Afghanistan has presented regional political, economic and defence opportunities that the US has long sought and which are now within its grasp. In September 2000, for example, General Tommy Franks - the man who made his name running the Afghan war - was already touring central Asia, waving a military aid chequebook. But on the whole, during the Clinton years, keen US interest in beating a path to central Asia's oil and gas riches remained largely stymied - especially after the 1998 cruise missile strikes on Afghanistan which followed the al-Qaida embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
Only a brief 18 months ago, indeed, the geo-strategic chit-chat was still all about a reassertion of Russian power in former Soviet territories such as Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan. Moscow's newly-installed president, Vladimir Putin, was particularly interested in the destabilising impact of Taliban-backed fundamentalists (whom he linked to Chechnya). "The actions of Islamic extremists in central Asia give Russia the chance to strengthen its position in the region," said a memo from the then Russian defence minister, Igor Sergeyev.
China, worried about unrest among its own western Muslim Uighur minority and alive to central Asia's strategic and economic potential, also moved in June last year to extend its regional influence through a new Shanghai pact.
But in the wake of September 11, and as the US-Russian dynamic in particular changed, Putin agreed (against the advice of some senior generals) to allow the US to negotiate the first, limited base and operational facilities with Afghanistan's neighbours. China, too, while objecting in principle to US intervention, in practice recognised the serious consequences of trying to thwart the US. Both countries hoped to benefit in other ways from helping the Americans - and have done so to a limited degree. The US has begun to treat Putin as a partner, even suggesting a closer relationship with Nato. Rows with Beijing over human rights and trade, after last spring's Hainan spy plane fracas, have been avoided. China's WTO membership has gone through without a hitch.
All the same, both countries increasingly have good reasons to regret their accommodating stand. Having pushed, cajoled and bribed its way into their central Asian backyard, the US clearly has no intention of leaving any time soon. Romantics who believe this demonstrates a commitment to rebuilding shattered Afghanistan can dream on.
The US's top priority remains, as ever, the pursuit and destruction of al-Qaida. That focus is now shifting elsewhere, into Pakistan, Somalia, even Iran. What is left behind in Afghanistan is for "coalitions of the willing", such as the under-powered security assistance force led by Britain, or aid agencies, or UN diplomats, or anybody but the Bush administration to deal with. In short, the former can build nations; the US builds empires.
The task of the encircling US bases now shooting up on Afghanistan's periphery is only partly to contain the threat of political regression or Taliban resurgence in Kabul. Their bigger, longer-term role is to project US power and US interests into countries previously beyond its reach.
Thus Uzbekistan now finds itself home to a permanent American base at Khanabad, housing 1,500 personnel; Manas, near Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan, is described as a future "transportation hub" housing 3,000 soldiers, warplanes and surveillance aircraft; more airfields are under US control in Tajikistan and Pakistan; and the Pentagon has begun regular replacement and rotation of troops, thereby instit-utionalising what were at the outset temporary, emergency deployments.
The temptations for the host governments are plain enough. Military cooperation typically works both ways. With the bases comes US agreement to provide training and equipment for local forces. Economic aid packages and trade agreements then follow. Thus previously neglected Uzbekistan received $64m in US assistance and $136m in US Export-Import Bank credits in 2001. In 2002, the Bush administration plans to hand over $52m in assistance to Kazakhstan, some partly for military equipment. The US security umbrella provides shelter from other predatory powers and effectively entrenches a group of mostly unpopular incumbent regimes.
According to Human Rights Watch, in its annual report published this week, these deals have been cut despite well-documented concern about authoritarian governance, a chronic lack of democracy and respect for human rights - torture of political prisoners is endemic in Tajikistan, for example - and often non-existent press freedoms across central Asia.
For US empire-builders, like imperialists through history, the answer to such contradictions is that exposure to superior values and standards will have an ultimately positive, uplifting effect. Meanwhile, the potential benefits for the US are enormous: growing military hegemony in one of the few parts of the world not already under Washington's sway, expanded strategic influence at Russia and China's expense, pivotal political clout and - grail of holy grails - access to the fabulous, non-Opec oil and gas wealth of central Asia. If the Afghans behave themselves, they even may get to run the pipeline.
A 1998 video produced by the Clinton-castrated Army lectured troops that terrorism was ambiguous and "relative." Now this outrageous example of political correctness is hurting the Bush administration's war on terrorism.
"It is one of the most politically correct, apologetic, anti-American diatribes I've ever seen," an official told the Times' respected reporters Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough.
"You'd think it was produced by al-Qaeda. It begins by stating that the 'Christian Crusaders' were terrorists in their time."
Clinton himself reflected these sentiments in a widely condemned speech Nov. 7 at liberal Georgetown University, where he blamed modern-day Muslim terrorism on Christian Crusades of centuries past.
The video reflects the Clinton administration's moral relativism by equating terrorists with freedom fighters. Anti-Nazi rebels in World War II were terrorists because they blew up bridges, the tape claims. "The analogy is upsetting because the U.S. Army provided assistance to the French fighters, and bridges are legitimate military targets in military operations," the Times noted.
"The video describes terrorists in the most complimentary terms, calling them 'highly motivated, very disciplined individuals who regard us as legitimate combatants,'" the official told the Times. "This suggests good-faith beliefs by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda legitimizes their actions."
Again, Clinton himself displayed this mind-set in a paid speech in October, when he said that bin Laden and his fellow mass-murdering terrorists "are good, they are uncompromising."
Gertz and Scarborough conclude: "The Army video is not just politically damaging. It is expected to cause legal problems for the Pentagon and Justice Department in their efforts to prosecute terrorists involved in the Pentagon and World Trade Center attacks."
And the Clinton legacy continues to this day!
As I mentioned earlier, the concentration camps began being built during the Clinton years, and yes for Americans. Because of hi-technology and the governments now being well advanced in mind-control technology we now have "the end of State Secrets and the beginning of the Secret Police Prison State!
Military personnel will not be aware, as the 21st Century marks the end of the ability of Western military-industrial complex to keep its secrets safe from spying. During the Cold War, MI6, CIA and NSA spied on the Soviets and Chinese, while MI5 and the FBI pursued Soviet and Chinese spies, rather like the glory years of naval might based on battleships, where no-one foresaw the rise of aircraft carriers that could strike at a distance and sink aircraft at will. Espionage still depends on signals intelligence like Echelon American Spy Satelite we spoke of in the past about, and spy and informer networks. But Russian remote viewers can now strike at distant targets, scan the minds of the MI6, CIA and NSA directors, control them with remote influencing, then remotely kill them at leisure ñ even with Pretzels. US RV (as proved by the hunt for bin Laden) based on incomplete protocols and scientific understanding. By the time World War 3 begins this fact may become painfully obvious to US and British military.
It is an open secret that America and Britain are going to take out China as I last year stated that China was one of our greater problems as well are several others I mentioned in this web site and for the following reasons:
The first is that the trillionaire elite need to bulldoze down countries with massive bombing, so their capitalist expansion can continue when that ruined country sells itself to the elite to pay for the rebuilding (the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan).
Secondly, China and India which have large populations are competing with the US and Britain for resources ñ cutting profits for Western shareholders ñ the ultimate sin.
Thirdly, China is arming the Muslim world with nuclear weapons via Pakistan (funded by Iran), which destabilised the Western hegemony.
The war on China will be won easily, Pentagon planners posit. Stealthy B-2s, F117s and F-22 Raptor fighters, aided by Aurora can destroy the Chinese missile defences, command and control and cripple the infrastructure. Aegis Cruisers armed with ballistic missile interceptors will take out Chinese intercontinental ballistic missiles as they flare brightly in the first stages of lift-off; converted Boeing 747s can take out the remainder with the SDI weapons platforms in space to finish the job. Once this is done US and British forces will reply with cruise missiles to take out Chinaís military capacity ñ the nuclear option is now viable as China pressed the button first. ëDamage but not destroyí will be the order of the day, so there are Chinese left to pay the trillions of dollars it will cost to rebuild China.
The only problem is that Russian psychic experts have systematically scanned the minds of US and British Intelligence heads, trawling for new technologies, like anti-gravity, beam weapons, gravity wave generators, electrodynamic stealth. Unlike other technologies, biophysical bioinformational warfare can be used exclusively by Russia; as the first nation in this new field of warfare it can effectively block all development of remote viewing, sensing, killing by any other race. Already many MI5, MI6, CIA, NSA personnel are practically walking zombies, stripped of their biophysical bodies - the bodies needed for biophysical warfare. None of the Western Intelligence personnel realise they no longer have the capability, as they never properly developed it.
This means that Russians now have dominance in biophysical and bioinformational space. During WW3, not only will every secret of the West be known but remote influencing will mean that the Russians can control British and US commanders and the trillionaire elite which own them. The West will never develop counter measures, as the first race to develop this technology can effectively patent it full time by using the fact that each race has a different morphogenetic field and collapsing reality into a chosen configuration where only the master race has access to psychic warfare.
Whether the Russians let China burn is a moot point, but the old post-Cold War dominance of the West is gone. MI6, the CIA and NSA are now superb vessels of information to be scanned at will so any of the so-called ëtop secretsí therein can be remotely sensed. Conventional intelligence networks are now obsolete; akin to the battleships that ruled the waves which are now scrap metal.
On the other hand, MI5 and the FBI ñ the secret police of Britain and US respectively ñ who spy on, terrorise, torture and kill their own population, will have vastly expanded remits in the US-Anglo corporate prison states of the future. September 11th, is to be followed by another so called ëterrorist atrocityí - most probably a suitcase nuke. It is well known that Osama bin Laden bought such devices from the Russian Mafia using Chechen go-betweens. Who actually is behind the next terror attack is a moot point, bin Laden, the US government, Britain and the Rothschilds, MossadÖ The result though will be the same, traumatised by Sept 11th, the US and British public will willingly agree to anything to stop the horror. MI5 and the FBI will have unlimited power. Taking Northern Ireland as a likely starting model for the US, expect to see armed checkpoints everywhere, mandatory ID, searches and houses stripped bare in search of arms caches ñ oh didnít I mention it, the 180 million guns in private possession in the US will have to go. One canít run a corporate prison state with an armed population. Expect most of the American population to accept this passively, the minority will not; they can expect violent repression to enforce the New World Orderís gun prohibition.
Concentration camps are built and ready in the US for the millions of seditious Americans who support an obsolete constitution ñ the camps have been there since Reaganís time. Indefinite detention without trial will be their sentence ñ the British called it internment ñ ask Gerry Adams about the details.
Compulsory Digital Angel implants will make controlling the population easy, the implant will be essential as it will be vital for your purchasing ñ as all money will be electronic (to fight terrorism), your position known at all times and for security reasons you will not be allowed to stray from work or home unless permitted ñ ask the middle-aged Russians for details, they remember the Soviet era. Digital Angel allows ELF modulated on microwave or RF transmitters throughout your city to be targeted accurately at your brain as the intelligence transmitters know your exact location, and the mood of the population can therefore be exactly controlled. It also enables dissident elements, who have a high profile, and therefore cannot be sent to a concentration camp, to be targeted with thermal microwaves so they die in short order, their brains irradiated wherever they go.
MI5 and the FBI have total surveillance of their own countries via CCTV, Magic Lantern (total surveillance of every computer key stroke via a worm sent down your landline), Carnivore, monitoring every email and website you receive or visit, EchelonÖso every inmate of the corporate prison state can be monitored around the clock, then imprisoned or cooked alive if they cause trouble, depending on social station ñ important dissidents are generally microwaved to avoid publicity ñ so beware congressmen and senators if you speak out against progress.
Inmates of the concentration camps make good cheap slave labour so corporate profits can boom ñ with China decimated, cheap labour will be in demand. The docile inmates of the corporate prison state will be routinely implanted with more invasive Digital Angels in the forehead, so brain function can be monitored and controlled via behavioural sets, using the known frequencies for thought and emotion -research pioneered by the NSA - this will enable the total control of the inmate so they become the perfect capitalist ideal ñ mindless slaves. Expect al Qaeda fugitives in Cuba to be implanted and mind controlled, to be followed by US patriots after they rebel against gun control.
In conclusion, post Cold War spies might be useless to the West but it may take them decades to realise they are obsolete. Unfortunately, the secret police are about to become the dominant factor in the lives of every US inmate in the New World Order prison camp called America. Every inmate will be forced to take ëthe mark of the beastí (Digital AngelÖ) whether they like it or not. Christophobia: U.N.'s War on Christianity
January 5, 2001
Some international body of "tolerance" just passed a manifesto declaring that any European nation not wishing to see its Christian heritage obliterated by immigrants is "intolerant" and suffering from "Islamophobia"!
This U.N. commission, under the guidance of that beacon of tolerance, Kofi Annan, compared Islamophobia to the other evils of our time: homophobia, anti-Semitism, racism, sexism and whatever other "ism" the Orwellian Total World Order Twerps (TWOTs) could come up with.
To want to preserve your own cultural and religious heritage is OK for some, but not for European Christians? This "doublespeak" is possible only because of the ultra-tolerance of benign Europeans. Has the pacification of Christians reached the point where illegal immigrants, who are now flooding into host nations, will soon demand not to assimilate but that the native population convert to their religion and their beliefs?
Impossible? What would you term the U.N.'s declaration of "Islamophobia" other than a war on Christianity? And, if the religion of Mohammed can be deemed worthy of verbal protection by the TWOTs of Geneva, why not the religion of Jesus? Can you name even one Muslim nation that is tolerant of other religions?
Is it time for us, the liberty-loving people of the world, to demand that those of us who are being assaulted because of our religious and cultural beliefs demand the attackers be called Christophobes? Study the verbal abuse heaped on John Ashcroft. You will see Christophobia naked and glaring.
The practitioners of this particular inquisition may declare themselves paragons of inclusion and tolerance, but their verbal assaults speak of a blind spot for just one religion.
A former CIA deep-cover agent turns whistleblower at great risk. His shocking allegations expose powerful names controlling the international drug trade in very high places.
Part 1.
Vietnam Special Forces Air Combat Controller; 25-year CIA deep-cover agent; US Army pilot flying classified missions during the US invasion of Grenada; Iran-Contra pilot flying cocaine shipments labelled as medical supplies; and member of the ultra-secret, international G7-run Pegasus "hit team"...this is the extraordinary story of Gene "Chip" Tatum. From sensitive, highly secretive (and hitherto largely unknown) Special Forces covert operations in Cambodia, to wandering CIA asset; through to "black ops" activities in Grenada and Oliver North's Iran-Contra "Enterprise", as well as membership in an international "hit team", Gene "Chip" Tatum has seen it all, done it all and is now telling it all.
Tatum claims to know where the skeletons are buried. Above all, he is aware that his testimony implicates serving and former US Presidents plus a whole list of high-level government officials and others in a welter of nefarious activities - including assassination, blackmail, coercion, gun-running, money-laundering and cocaine-trafficking. Tatum, a lanky Floridian, turned whistleblower following his arrest on a treason charge in early 1995. The charge was both astonishing and patently ludicrous, and was later dropped and replaced by a fraud charge - a drastic step-down. Found guilty, he was sentenced to serve a 15-month sentence.
In March 1996, an additional charge - conspiring to embezzle - was brought against him. Found guilty, he was incarcerated in Jesup Federal Correctional Facility, Georgia, where he is serving a 27-month concurrent sentence. Ensuing press interest resulted in one article appearing in the Tampa Tribune on 4 May 1996. Many questions continue to hang over the conduct of the trial. His defence lawyer refused to call any of the 80 witnesses whom Tatum nominated for the defence. Later, his lawyer freely confessed to having come under pressure from the US Department of Defense.
Tatum says the first charge was a set-up to discredit him following his "resignation" from "Operation Pegasus". The second charge he views with greater scepticism and concern. Tatum's resignation from Pegasus followed his refusal to "neutralise" a leading US political figure in the 1992 US presidential elections. Tatum declares he will not "participate in assassinations of any sort, character assassinations or anything, of American citizens". He goes on to explain that back in 1994, in a telephone conference call involving Oliver North, Felix Rodríguez and the late William Colby of the CIA, he was warned to turn over incriminating documents and tapes he had accumulated for his "retirement". He wryly observes that had he done so, he would probably have been quickly "terminated" in an "extreme" way - a speciality of the Pegasus team of which he was once a member.
Countering this demand, Tatum volunteered to plead guilty on a fabricated felony count and serve a 12-month sentence - so that his credibility would be damaged in the event he ever decided to speak out. His incarceration for the second charge - and especially the six- month sentence of his wife, Nancy - led him to speak out about his life, almost 30 years of which he served as a "black" operative, and to reveal and destroy the command structure of Pegasus. It is an extraordinary story.
"OPERATION RED ROCK"
Tatum has written of his early career in the military, and his involvement in a highly sensitive and classified operation, in an unpublished manuscript entitled "Operation Red Rock". Joining the Air Force in February 1970, he went through Army jump school, escape and evasion training, jungle training, sea survival school and diving school and was assigned along with six others as "Combat Controllers" (the USAF equivalent of Special Forces), receiving his distinctive Special Forces burgundy-coloured beret. From there he was assigned to Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, and then on to Fort Bragg, North Carolina - home of the "Green Berets" - for training in C4 plastic explosives, mines, nuclear, biological and chemical warfare, plus indoctrination in electronic and psychological operations.
Posted to South-East Asia as Airman First Class (A1C) in December 1970, he was assigned as a radio operator on a Forward Air Control (FAC) aircraft attached to Task Force Alpha at Nakhon Phanom, Thailand. In short order he was recruited (an involuntary "volunteer") to "Team Red Rock". The team was composed of eight US Army Green Berets, three US Navy SEALs and two "cowboys" - a euphemism for CIA paramilitary specialists. With Tatum attached, Team Red Rock totalled 14 in all, and was about to be tasked with an operation that came directly from the White House.
In January 1971 the team received a final briefing from General Alexander Haig, who had flown in specially, along with CIA Saigon Chief William Colby - nicknamed by the team as "Mr Peepers" because of his resemblance to a well-known character in a TV sitcom. Haig and Colby outlined the plan, stressing its importance and extreme classification. President Nixon, desperate to quell domestic riots over an increasingly unpopular war, sought to withdraw all US personnel from South-East Asia. Withdrawal would - and, in the end, ultimately did - cause a military vacuum, quickly leading to the defeat of South Vietnamese forces.
During those years, Nixon was also running a "secret war" in Cambodia and Laos. In Laos, a dwindling number of Meo tribesmen, together with covert US personnel employed by the CIA proprietary company, Air America, were battling against superior North Vietnamese ground forces. A much similar pattern was occurring in Cambodia, amid grave fears that the "domino theory" would result if either of these two nations were to fall to the Communist North Vietnamese. Nixon hoped that the vacuum caused by the withdrawal of US covert forces could be filled by native Cambodian forces. Lon Nol, the Cambodian leader, stubbornly continued to resist Nixon's diplomatic overtures to take up the slack, being anxious to hedge his bets and realistic about his chances of survival as Khmer Rouge and Vietnamese forces prepared to swarm in, unhindered by US air power. A plan had been drawn up at the highest levels of Nixon's administration. Team Red Rock were to enter Cambodia's capital, Phnom Penh, in secret and attack the airport and military and civil installations, wreaking as much havoc as possible.
The plan called for the team to parachute into the outskirts of Phnom Penh, carrying captured NVA "Sappers" with them. Taken in unarmed and alive, the Sappers would be "sacrificed" and their bodies left to be discovered by Cambodian forces. A furious Lon Nol would assume North Vietnam was to blame. It was hoped that such an act would stiffen Lon Nol's backbone. With nowhere else to turn, the US puppet would urgently seek US hardware to strengthen his forces and continue the battle. The team members were not told that they, too, were to be sacrificed by their President to ensure that word of the operation never reached the light of day. A detachment of Montagnard tribesmen ("the Yards"), in the pay of the CIA, was assigned to liquidate each member of the team and dispose of the bodies.
The attack went successfully, but the team's suspicion of "the Yards" foiled the betrayal. Using their knowledge of "escape and evasion" tactics, the team decided to trek to the Vietnamese border and back to safety with US forces.1 Casualties thinned out their numbers until only eight of them remained. Soon these, too, were captured by NVA regulars and underwent hideous torture at the hands of Chinese and Russian interrogators.
Ultimately, only Tatum and one other team member survived the ordeal. Convalescing, Tatum was debriefed by CIA station chief, William Colby, and told he would, in future, be kept close to "the Agency". Recruited into the CIA, the yawning door of future "black" operations creaked open. Life would never be the same again for Chip Tatum.
CIA DEEP-COVER AGENT
For the next 10 years or so, Tatum's covert activities were varied. For a while, he worked out of Homestead Air Force Base where he was NCIOC of the tower receiver sight and MARS station. This was the base which then-President Nixon used for his frequent visits to the Key Biscayne, Florida, "White House". Much of this period remains obscured behind a thick blanket of classification. From there, he was stationed in northern Italy, tasked with visiting the border towns of Yugoslavia and Italy. Colby felt that as a young Air Force man, Tatum might be "approached" in these towns for "information". The idea was to make contact with foreign agents and covertly gather information about them and their operations. Later, he was tasked with infiltrating Yugoslavia in order to gather intelligence on potential successors to the then Yugoslavian President Tito.
Tatum was also sent to search for missing US POWs from Vietnam and elsewhere in South-East Asia. By 1976, Tatum was operating out of Lamar, Colorado, in a communications facility called OLAB. His contact there was Don Holmes, president of Valley - a Savings & Loan bank.2 Tatum acted as his courier, shuttling between Lamar and Springfield, Colorado, with transaction files. From there he was transferred to MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida. Shortly before his MacDill posting, Tatum received a call from Colby telling him he was resigning his position as Director, Central Intelligence, and recommending Tatum should deactivate his clandestine CIA activities.
Colby continued, saying that remaining active without Colby there to protect him might place him in personal "jeopardy", as he had powerful enemies in Washington. This warning referred to Nixon, Kissinger and Haig, and Tatum's role in and survival from "Operation Red Rock". Tatum took good notice of the warning and became deactive. Later, in 1979, he requested and was granted entry into a USAF Reserve program. Leaving active military service he moved to Gunnison, Colorado, and took up a position with Bo Calloway, owner of the Crested Bute ski area.
The appointment was arranged by Colby. During 1980 he received a visit from two men who informed him he was being reactivated, but into the US Army instead of the Air Force. He was sent to the US Army Flight School for rotary- wing training at Fort Rucker. From there he was assigned to the 160th Aviation Battalion/Special Forces at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Shortly afterwards, the 160th combined with others to form Task Force 160.
It was in this unit that Tatum played a "spooky" role in the US invasion of Grenada. A photograph of him standing in front of his MD-500 Defender gunship on the beach-head in Grenada, appeared along with a feature story in the Louisville Courier-Journal. Tatum will only say of this episode that he "wasn't there", in the same sense that he "wasn't in Cambodia". At that time he was attached to the US Army's 160th air wing at Fort Campbell. Not only was the Hughes helicopter then not in the Army's inventory, but the 160th didn't officially exist. Jim Malone, of the Louisville Courier-Journal, finds this extraordinary. He has documents showing the 160th was stationed at Fort Campbell, even though officials in the Pentagon continue to deny it - as they deny the wing's role in Grenada. Malone, in a telephone conversation with this writer, advised that the 160th is now stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina - home of the famous Special Forces, the Green Berets. Their mission is to fly "Delta teams" on covert assignments, Malone added.
THE CONTRA COCAINE TRAIN
During 1983, Colby established contact again, advising Tatum he would shortly be contacted by "a man called North". This, as Tatum was to discover later, was none other than Lt Col. Oliver North - the central architect of America's Nicaraguan Contra campaign. Besides fighting a covert war, North was also the link-man in much, much dirtier work. The "Contragate" years teem with well-documented accounts of illicit wholesale gun-running and dope-smuggling. The exposé series published in Autumn 1996 by the San Jose Mercury-Post, entitled "The Dark Alliance", openly finger-points at the CIA and the Reagan administration for turning a blind eye to massive cocaine smuggling. Moreover, the series of articles claims that the explosion of "crack cocaine" in Los Angeles resulted entirely from the Contra leaders-cum-dope peddlers who made vast personal fortunes from their activities.
Today, the official argument remains that the Contras were "freelancing" without the knowledge or consent of their CIA "handlers" or North's so-called "Enterprise". Despite these assertions, mountains of hard evidence point in a different direction. Included in this evidence is an entry from North's own diary which shows his knowledge of cocaine shipments. In stark contrast to these denials, Tatum says that North's "Enterprise" not only set up the cocaine factories and "ran" the Colombian cartels, but was also responsible for masterminding the massive shipments of narcotics into the US. Significantly, he is not alone in making these accusations. A number of those involved in Col. North's operations have subsequently come forward and spilled the beans.
Almost all of these "whistleblowers" have been hounded and imprisoned. Some have died, whilst others have fled. The whole Contra thing, Tatum states, was also being used by an extremely covert group called Pegasus. During February 1985, Tatum was piloting "Dustoff" (Medevac) flights for the US Army's 3/498th Medical Company, stationed at Fort Stewart, Georgia. Two flight crews, including Tatum's, were transferred to Palmerola Air Base, Honduras. Each flight consisted of a pilot, copilot, medic and crew chief. Once familiarised, they assumed the Medevac mission for Joint Task Force Bravo. Previously, in 1984, Tatum infiltrated the 3/498th on the instructions of Lt Col. Oliver North who had established contact under the code-name "Jake" (North had "control" of the 160th air wing and was also deeply involved with the tactical planning of "black ops" missions in the Grenada invasion).
On 15 February 1985, during a flight to La Ceiba, Honduras, he was instructed to contact his local "handler", Major Felix Rodríguez - later to prove a major figure in the Iran-Contra investigation. Rodríguez informed Tatum that in addition to his Army "Medevac" duties he was to support covert "Pegasus" missions. These, he was told, would take priority over his other duties. He was also given his "chain of command": three individuals, any of whom could authorise Pegasus missions.
In addition to Oliver North and Felix Rodríguez, Tatum would henceforward take orders from Amiram Nir, a former Mossad agent and advisor to Vice President Bush. Aviation support for Pegasus missions operated out of Ilopango Air Base, Honduras (home of the CIA proprietary airline Corporate Air Services) plus numerous Contra camps located in the jungles and mountains along the Honduras-Nicaragua border.3 A common feature of all future Pegasus missions was the transport "of large white coolers in and out of the Contra camps". On 26 February 1985, Tatum and his crew were instructed to fly two individuals to one of the larger Contra camps on the Honduran border.
His flight log lists the names of the two individuals as Bill Cooper and Buzz Sawyer, both of whom worked for Corporate Air Services. Following a meeting between the CIA agents and Contra leaders, Tatum was given a sealed cooler, marked "Vaccine", weighing approximately 200 pounds, and instructed to deliver it to a USAF C-130 transport plane at La Mesa Airport, Honduras. Two crew members offloading the cooler accidentally dropped it, breaking the seal. Inside were over 100 bags of cocaine. Tatum resealed the cooler and later watched as it was transferred aboard the C-130, outward bound for Panama.
On his return to Palmerola Air Base, Honduras, Tatum phoned Col. North to advise him of his discovery. North replied that it was "a trophy of war" and that the "Sandinistas are manufacturing cocaine and selling it to fund the military". North closed the conversation by saying that "the cocaine was bound for the world courts as evidence" against the Sandinistas. The whole incident struck Tatum as odd and reminded him strongly of earlier missions dating back to 1983-84 when he was stationed at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, as a Special Operations pilot. Regularly he would trans-ship white coolers, marked as "Medical Supplies", to Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas.
On two occasions he carried similar coolers to Mena Airport, Arkansas. Deliveries of medical coolers to Little Rock AFB were picked up by Dr Dan Lasater - a close confidant of the then Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton. By now, almost two years later, Tatum had decided to document his discovery to safeguard his "retirement". Thereafter, he documented all Pegasus flights on the reverse of his flight logs. This was a difficult time for Tatum, since he had three balls to juggle at the same time. On the one hand he was flying classified active-duty missions for the US Army; on the other, he was flying CIA missions arranged through Mil. Group A (CIA), located at the embassy in Tegucigalpa, Honduras; and thirdly, he was flying Pegasus missions under the control of William Colby, Oliver North and George Bush following his recruitment into Pegasus by Colby in 1986.
Tatum completed numerous missions during his rotation out of Honduras. Picking up and trans-shipping coolers containing cocaine was a regular event. Extraordinarily, this included infiltrating Nicaraguan airspace (Tatum says it was not difficult to infiltrate any country and that "foreign powers" would kill to know how it is done), and landing at Bluefields Air Base with deliveries for placement aboard civilian C-123s and C-130s.4 This mission was followed by a brief stint in Colombia, where he was assigned to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration's "War on Drugs", only to discover the DEA was heavily engaged in narcotics trafficking.
THE "BOSS HOG" LIST
One of the most flamboyant individuals involved in the cocaine trail from Columbia through Honduras to Panama and on into the United States, was Barry Seal. Seal flew an assortment of aircraft, offloading shipments of weapons in South America and picking up deliveries of cocaine for his return flight to the US on behalf of Col. North's Enterprise. His primary base of operations was Mena Airport, Arkansas. A CIA "asset", Seal was later arrested and became a DEA informer. Prior to his killing in 1986 - allegedly by a Medellín cartel assassination squad in revenge for informing on them - Seal openly boasted he had information that implicated high-level government officials, including then-Vice President Bush, in the Enterprise's narcotics-trafficking business.
Tatum would soon get to meet Barry Seal and become close friends. Tatum recalls being present during a meeting between Oliver North, Felix Rodríguez, Amiram Nir and General Alvarez from Honduras, when North stated that Vice President Bush was going to have his son Jeb arrange "something out of Columbia". This conversation focused on Barry Seal's increasingly notorious activities. When Tatum later heard Seal had died, he immediately understood who was behind the killing. The discussion also made it clear that VP Bush, Governor Clinton and his three respective "handlers" were knee-deep in the cocaine venture and making fistloads of money. Unknown to all those present, Seal had earlier provided Tatum with a list of names of those high-level government officials deeply involved with or responsible for controlling the narcotics business. Seal called them the "Boss Hogs".
Tatum has kept this list a tightly-held secret until recent weeks. The list cites the surnames only, and is reproduced above, as I received it, complete with misspellings as written. I have appended their full names and titles in brackets.
"BOSS HOGS" UNITED STATES
Casey (William Casey, Director Central Intelligence)
Clair-George (Clair Elroy George, Head of CIA's Central American Task Force)
Bush (Vice President George Bush)
Kissinger (Dr Henry Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates; former US Secretary
of State; former National Security Adviser)
Haig (General Alexander Haig, former Secretary of State)
Greg (Donald Gregg, former National Security Adviser to VP Bush, Ambassador to Korea and alleged joint "Controller" of Panama's Manuel Noriega, along with William Casey)
Clairage (Duane "Dewey" Clarradge, CIA)
Fernandez (Joseph Fernandez, CIA Costa Rica Station Chief)
North (Lt Col. Oliver North, National Security Council aide)
Singlaub (John Singlaub, CIA covert operator)
Colby (William Colby, Director Central Intelligence, 1973-76)
Secord (Richard V. Secord, regarded as a "brilliant" CIA black operative)
Weld (William Weld, head of Criminal Division, US Department of Justice; instrumental in "blocking" Senate investigations into narcotics, according to testimony of former Senate special investigator, Jack Blum)
Rodriguez (Felix Rodríguez, CIA officer with close connection to VP Bush)
Peroot (General Peroot, Defense Intelligence Agency)
Most, if not all of these names are readily familiar to Contragate investigators and journalists covering this story. Allegations regarding the involvement of former President George Bush in the cocaine business are by no means new - they abound in plentiful supply. The fact that Bush pardoned a number of his closest advisors, who were facing criminal prosecution and possible imprisonment, late on Christmas Eve 1992, just weeks before Bill Clinton's inauguration, left a sour taste in the mouths of many. If prosecuted, they clearly would have fingered the President himself.
PEGASUS: DIRTY MONEY LAUNDERING
But Tatum's story takes us even further along the dark road of power, greed and corruption. During l986, he had left Honduras and set up a money-laundering business in Watertown, New York State, close to the home base of the Army's 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. The location was chosen with care. With access to Fort Drum's telephone lines for secure communications, he was assigned a Cherokee-140 fixed-wing aircraft,5 used to ship personnel and supplies across the Canadian border under radar cover. His tenure with these companies lasted from 1986 through to 1990. This was a pure Pegasus operation.
It was at Watertown that Tatum was provided with a civilian cover in the form of three construction companies: American National Home Builders, American Constructors and American Homes. Funding was provided by Henry Hyde, an Illinois Republican politician and well known as the CIA's "black money" man. Hyde provided a US$250,000 line of credit with Key Bank, Watertown. Although Tatum was listed as the president in all three companies, in reality all were under the control of Ben Whittaker, a lawyer from Rochester, New York. Whittaker, Tatum says, is closely associated with Tony Wilson of the Wilson family who owned Xerox Corporation.
They are extremely wealthy and "friends of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers". In addition, he was also closely associated with South Eastern US Investment Group (SEUS) - an investment bank in Savannah, Georgia - from 1985 through to 1989. Another proprietary he was involved with was Irving Place Development, a service organisation of Irving Bank and Trust Company.
Cocaine proceeds were laundered through these companies by an ingenious use of construction loans. In response to a question asking why the "drug-related money" was placed in "Arkansas, Colorado and Ohio", Tatum simply explains that he doesn't know why, adding that "It was being done before I got there. I assume banking laws and whether or not Bush had people in his pocket in these areas."
He does explain that the primary figure involved in the laundry exercise in Arkansas was "Jack Stephens". Jackson Stephens, owner of Worthen Bank & Trust Company, is closely aligned with President Bill Clinton. Tatum states that "...Clinton received the cash and divided it up between Stephens and [Dan] Lasater to clean it up. Stephens' company [Worthen Bank] was used as the guarantor, providing 'warehouse' lines of credit."
Developing this theme in more detail, Tatum explains that the Enterprise was receiving drugs in exchange for the guns they supplied to the Contras. The raw product in the form of coca leaves was supplied by the Colombians and pressed into large cube-shaped bales and then shipped to Nicaragua and Honduras.6 All the "product" was pre-sold and the delivery into the US "guaranteed". This eventually resulted in the sale proceeds being pre-paid to Panama, under Noriega's control. Some of this money was washed through banks and other companies operating in Panama and elsewhere. The rest was sent to Arkansas, Ohio and Colorado.
Thereafter, the dirty money was filtered via construction loans with permanent "takeouts" "arranged by banks and mortgage- lenders". These, in turn, were later sold to Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's - negotiable US Federal Mortgage Securities that are traded globally on a daily basis. Each laundry "cycle" lasted from six months to a year. The result was dirty money transformed into good, clean, US currency.
This system wasn't arbitrary or accidental. One initial "test-bed" was a small residential mortgage lender named Carl I. Brown (CIB) in Kansas. Others were larger, and still others became national. All were ultimately destined to be purchased by a bank (proprietary) from Japan within a specific time-frame, 1996, as part of ongoing Pegasus plans. Eric Brown, the son of the founder of CIB, was heavily involved in these activities. Three additional companies were involved, to Tatum's knowledge: US Homes, Pulte Homes and Richmond Homes. All became very successful, providing "the American dream - as VP Bush put it in a meeting in 1987".
PEGASUS: ASSASSINATION & NEUTRALISATION
Tatum has gone into considerable additional detail regarding the role of Pegasus as he knew it. He believes Pegasus was established during the Eisenhower years as a secret group inside the CIA to spy on that agency on behalf of the President. At some point - believed to be after the assassination of President Kennedy - Pegasus went AWOL from direct US Government control and came under the direction of an international Board of Directors which Tatum alleges now includes George Bush and Henry Kissinger. The directors of Pegasus meet once a year in secret conclave following G7 meetings. The group has "representation" from a number of intelligence agencies throughout the world. Included are the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) as well as agents from British, Israeli, Turkish and Danish Intelligence plus "others who performed various functions for Pegasus".7
The mission of Pegasus, Tatum explains, is "to 'align' world leaders and financiers to our [US] policies and standards". One of Tatum's Pegasus duties included flying "Archer Teams" (four-man hit teams) in his helicopter to their insertion point.8 He states that Enrique Bermudez was assassinated in 1991 by a Pegasus team, adding he "was shot in the back of the head while walking down the street...from about 150 yards". Bermudez, known as "Commander Three Eight Zero" was the senior Contra leader. Tatum received two broken ribs when he came under small-arms fire during the assassination.9 Following the Nicaraguan war, Bermudez sought a prominent position in the new government. Spurned by President Chamorro, "Commander 380" tried to pressure George Bush to intercede on his behalf, threatening to expose Bush's role in the cocaine trafficking enterprise.
According to Tatum, Bush ordered his disposal. Another Pegasus assassination was that of General Gustavo (Dr Gus) Alvarez Martinez, the "cooperating" Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief, Honduras. Alvarez was assassinated in 1989, following his demand for a bigger split of the cocaine profits. Tatum also describes his involvement in the assassination of Amiram Nir, the former Israeli Mossad agent who went under the assumed name of Pat Weber. Nir was scheduled to testify to the Senate subcommittee and it was feared he would reveal the truth. He perished, following the shooting-down of his aircraft with missiles from Tatum's helicopter.
Other "neutralisations" verge on the bizarre. An individual who must remain nameless for a variety of reasons - but whose name is known to this writer - underwent an experience that is both horrific and chilling. Readers are warned that what follows is not at all pleasant. For the sake of ease, I shall call this individual "Mr X" or, simply, "X".10 Mr X was a leader of one of the largest CIA-backed Contra groups. He recently testified before the US Senate Intelligence Committee.
Formerly, X was a senior executive in a South American subsidiary of a leading US soft drinks corporation. During his Senate testimony, he denied any knowledge of CIA involvement in the narcotics trade, adding that condoning such activity would have been foreign to his way of life. Not so, says Tatum. Mr X had been recruited into the CIA by then-Director William Casey, with the assistance of Oliver North. In 1990, when Nicaraguan leader Daniel Ortega announced there would be "free elections", X was ecstatic. He began jostling for position and asked President Bush to ensure he be given a prominent position in the new government - in return for his years of toil at the behest of the CIA and the Enterprise.
The pressure came in a form that Bush could not ignore. Failure to help his friend would result in X's intimate knowledge of Bush's involvement in the dope trade being made public. His threat left Bush with a sour taste. A Pegasus team was assigned to "neutralise" him in early 1990. Mr X, Tatum states, "fancied himself a lover of women. Tall, large-breasted blondes were his favourite. It was determined that, if effectively neutralised, [X] could be an asset. Therefore, it was decided that intimidation would be used to control [X]." They chose to use the drug Scopolamine, which also went by the nickname "Burundanga" or "the Voodoo drug".
The drug is extracted from the pods of a flowering shrub that grows in remote regions of South America. In its processed, powdered form, Scopolamine is "void of smell, void of taste". When properly administered "it causes absolute obedience" without this being "observable by others". Importantly, the target will not recall any of the events that occurred during the period they were under the spell of the drug. In outlining these details, Tatum adds that it is important to administer the drug in the correct dosage, for he has known targets to die from too high a dose. Others have "remained under the influence of Burundanga for up to three weeks".
Precise dosage can be achieved by liquid ingestion, the powder being readily soluble. Ingestion via cigarettes is also an optimum method of ingestion. It is fast-acting and takes no more than 20 minutes to work. Tatum states that X was invited to spend a relaxing weekend at a luxury hotel as a guest of his friend George Bush. His host for the weekend was a trusted 18-year veteran field-intelligence officer. The evening started with cocktails and was followed by a fine meal. "'Nothing but the best' were the orders." Following the meal, he was ushered into the suite of a "blonde bombshell" supplied by the CIA. Mr X had already ingested a dose of Burundanga during pre-dinner cocktails. X was gallant with the blonde as they both moved into the bedroom where video cameras were already set up in one corner.
In short order, the blonde had X standing naked in front of her and began to indulge his desires. All the while, the video cameras whirred. Slowly stripping off, the "blonde" revealed his manhood in all its glory. Mr X was instructed to reciprocate the favour and perform fellatio. He obliged, his intimate activities recorded at 24 frames a second on videotape. Tatum says the male prostitute was hired from a bar in New York and killed that same evening. Two weeks later, X - wholly unaware of the events of that evening - was visited in Nicaragua. He was presented with a copy of the video footage, along with instructions. Tatum says that X can never allow that video to be seen: "Not only does it reveal his homosexuality, but it also reveals his bestiality and satanic worship rituals." As frame after frame flicked by, X reportedly wept, forced to watch himself kill his homosexual "lover" and then engage in the most grisly cannabalistic ritual imaginable. Neutralised, Mr X became a leading member of the Nicaraguan government a few short weeks later.11
PLANNING FOR RETIREMENT
Since 1985, when he first became aware of the Enterprise drug- smuggling, Tatum began collecting documents, audiotapes and videotapes for his "retirement". He was acutely aware that most deep-cover agents do not survive long in what is a very dirty game at a high-stakes poker table. Tatum says that, in 1992, President Bush instructed him to "neutralise" presidential runner Ross Perot, but he refused to do so. Tatum turned over a copy of an incriminating tape to President Bush, explaining that it would not be released - providing that he, his family and Perot were kept safe. He also told the President that copies of the tape had been placed in six different locations worldwide, saying, "if I didn't contact these capsule-holders by a certain time each year, they are to be sent to the addresses on the packaging". He closed the conversation by stating that when he originally "placed the packages, I gave explicit instructions that if I asked for them to be sent back to me, they were to send them to the addresses on the packages." This, Tatum reasoned, would avoid intimidation or torture.
Endnotes
1. Tatum has provided me with a variety of documents covering his military and CIA career from 1971 through 1986 when he was discharged from the US Army. His discharge papers outline a series of military decorations and campaign medals including "The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device" and the "Vietnam Service Medal" (there are many others). Appended to these papers is a medical report, signed by Major Charlie Talbert, which outlines Tatum's various injuries gained during his military career and includes notations describing his capture and torture in South-East Asia. Major Talbert reports that these injuries were treated in June 1972, and adds that Tatum's medical records are incomplete "as details on this are classified". I queried Tatum on the date, which should have been recorded as 1971. He responded, saying it was definitely 1971 and that the Army doctor only had "Secret" security clearance whereas Tatum had "Top Secret" clearance (confirmed in other military records, dated 1972, in my possession). Tatum avers that this discrepancy was the result of a typographical mistake on the part of the Army doctor. Moreover, Tatum's covert role in the CIA is additionally confirmed by other military papers provided to me. In one dated 1974, Tatum's assignment orders were "cut" by a Lt General USAF (name redacted) who was Chief Military Intelligence Adviser to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Other corroborative documents in my possession include a US Army payslip dated 1985; a copy of an "Inmate Request Form" on the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, showing Tatum was being detained on a "treason" charge; assignment papers to the 3/498th Medac at Fort Campbell, dated 12 April 1984; copies of media news articles describing the attack onPhnom Penh; a news report and photograph of Tatum in Grenada; a Special Forces USA MEDDAC Mission Request Form dated 6 April 1985, detailing Barry Seal's "Boss Hogs" listing; plus hard copies of Tatum's flight logs during his Honduras "rotation", additionally supported by photographs of the original flight logs. I also have a copy of a TWIX message from the Commander US Forces, Honduras (Task Force Bravo), stating to his superiors that "It has become increasingly evident during the past six weeks that Medevac A/C, in direct support of JTFs, in some cases are being utilised for other than Medevac requirements and are being controlled by other than Medevac Officials." Tatum says he obtained a copy of this message from his Pegasus controller.I also have a copy of Tatum's full book manuscript, "Operation Red Rock", together with a letter he sent to William Colby, dated 6 March 1996, which threaten: "I will not only write about the missions but about the NWO timetable and planned events, including a chronology. And I will name names. "I have other documents that I am not permitted to reveal but which corroborate missions in South America.
2. The word "contact" is not meant to imply that Don Holmes was a CIA type.
3. Tatum says that, through 1985, "aviation support" for Pegasus was primarily out of Palmerola Air Base, Honduras. Ilopango Air Base is in El Salvador and it had "operational" support.
4. Tatum adds that he had limited flights to Bluefields Air Base, Nicaragua, but "primarily the military aircraft used were USAF C-141s and C-130s at Palmerola, La Mesa and San Lorenzo, Honduras. At San Lorenzo there were also civilian aircraft, including civilian C-123s."
5. In addition to flying rotary-wing aircraft, Tatum was also competent flying smaller fixed-wing craft. He had access to both at Fort Drum.
6. Tatum adds in this connection that they were "supplied with leaves and paste called 'bazooko'...the reason for that was because they were not supplying the paste fast enough, so they needed the leaves to make up for the time. The leaves were brought from Peru."
7. I wrote this sentence based on information provided to me and also extracted from a long list of Q&As prepared by author Rodney Stich for Tatum's attention (and now in my possession). In reviewing this article for errors and omissions, Tatum stated that "there were no US DEA or ATF agents in Pegasus". This appeared to conflict with an earlier reply to one of Stich's questions which stated, in part, that "DEA was represented. We had DEA agents, ATF agents." Naturally, I wanted this clarified and asked Tatum to explain this quite significant amendment. He replied, advising that "there were joint missions where DEA and ATF agents were used...they were not officially part of Pegasus". Nancy Tatum advises that since Chip Tatum was in prison at the time he answered questions submitted by Stich, the "misunderstanding" was hers.
8. Tatum adds that he also "flew fixed-wing, multi-engine props and jets...for the various missions" and he was not limited to rotary-wing aircraft.
9. These injuries occurred during the departure of the "Team", six hours after the assassination itself, when they came under anti-aircraft fire as they flew low-level across the border. Tatum was wearing two Kevlar (lightweight body armour) vests which absorbed the impact of incoming rounds.
10. Tatum has provided me with the name of this individual, a well-known politician. He also asked that I consider excising this account from the article, for a variety of understandable reasons. I have elected to keep it, as I believe it is both an important and highly significant account.
11. I phoned and spoke with Ron Lard, an official at the DEA HQ, Virginia, to ask about the properties of Burundanga. He was unable to provide any information. However, through other sources I can confirm that this drug is well known to cause both amnesia and a zombie-like trance in which the target follows all orders. Dr Camilo Uribe, head of Bogotá's toxicology clinic, says "it's like chemical hypnotism". See Wall Street Journal, 3 July 1995.
Part 2.
During his 22 years as a deep-cover CIA and DIA operative, Gene "Chip" Tatum saw or participated in a remarkable series of covert operations. Foremost in his mind are the years 1986-92, when he operated for a group he called "Pegasus". This group operated on behalf of the US and other governments, undertaking tasks that ranged from narcotics smuggling to assassinations. The name "Pegasus" was, in fact, a 'cover' designation used by Tatum to protect himself against possible prosecution. Earlier this year Tatum revealed the true structure of the group and explained why he felt the need to conceal it. Timing was all important. In a message to this writer, Tatum stated, "It has now been well past the five-year statute of limitations which could have come back and haunted me.
That date was January 22, 1997. On January 21, 1992 I walked out of the Jupiter Island meeting to which I referred earlier." Few individuals, even now, are aware of the significance of Jupiter Island. Located on the Atlantic coast of Florida, just a few miles north of Palm Beach, the island measures a mere half a mile wide and nine miles long. According to authors Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin, island residents read like a "Who's Who" of the Anglo-American establishment. Many have close connections to the intelligence apparatus and not a few are, or have been, members of the notorious Skull and Bones Society, a secretive and influential Masonic lodge formed at Yale law school.1 Interestingly, many of the early residents, including Averell Harriman and Prescott Bush-George Bush's father-were strong supporters of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist Party prior to World War II.
Even in recent years, George Bush continued to have unfinished work with Nazis domiciled in South America, Tatum says-especially while the world's eyes were turned towards Saddam Hussein and Iraq during Desert Storm. That, however, is another story. Jupiter Island boasts hyper-security.
All vehicles are tracked by sensors placed in the roads and every housekeeper, gardener or other non-resident is required by ordinance to be fingerprinted and registered. Residents themselves are carefully screened prior to being permitted to purchase real estate (many purchase by invitation, it is thought) and one of their primary duties as good residents is to perform active 'surveillance' to ensure the island remains secure.2 It was here that Tatum met with and discussed sensitive projects with then Vice President and later President Bush, at the residence of his mother, Rose Bush.
SECRET GOVERNMENT APPARATUS
The so-called Pegasus group's organisational structure, as provided by Tatum, demands recounting in detail. The various presidential orders, which led to the formation and operation of the covert activities in which Tatum and others participated, are significant for they constitute a secret government within a government. This is the power that hides behind the open face of democratic government. Some have called this power base "the Octopus". Activities include high-level narcotics trafficking, illegal transfers of ultra-high-tech weaponry, money laundering on a massive scale and an odd "hit" or "alignment" to keep wobbly-kneed individuals on the straight and narrow.
It was in 1981, according to Tatum, that "President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive number 3 (NSDD-3) which authorised the Vice President to chair the Special Situation Group (SSG). The Special Situation Group was a division under the National Security Council (NSC). One entity formed to support the SSG was the Terrorist Incident Working Group (TIWG), established in April 1982 by authority of President Reagan in NSDD-30. This group consisted of representatives of the following: Director of Central Intelligence, Department of Defense (DoD), FBI, NSC staff and others as required.3
Tatum explained that, "The purpose of TIWG is to provide SSG with direct operational support. TIWG then recommended to the President that a Terrorism Task Force be formed and chaired by the head of SSG (the Vice President). Reagan approved NSDD-138 in April 1984, which extended TIWG's arm and ability to form sub-groups. As a result of NSDD-138 was the formation of the Operations Sub-Group (OSG). The Sub-Group was a select NSC-DoD-CIA-FBI-foreign intelligence agency which operated so as to bypass the regular operations of intelligence/military/law-enforcement agencies. OSG was formed in February 1986."
Having revealed the framework of the authorising presidential directives necessary for the conduct of these covert operations, Tatum then detailed the nitty-gritty of the OSG: "I was an operative for OSG from April 1986 through January 1992. When I was operating under the authority of the OSG I would report directly to the OSG, not to the CIA or DIA. This 'secret government' apparatus, built by Bush from 1981 to 1986, was able to draw upon assets from the CIA, the DoD Special Operations units and the private sector. Using the private sector clause, Don Gregg, VP Bush's National Security Advisor, included a representative from British Intelligence and Israeli Intelligence.
To date I have called this group 'Pegasus' in an attempt not to divulge its true identity until I was on safe ground. Although most of the missions performed by OSG-2 are classified, the existence of the organisation is now declassified." Until Tatum forwarded these details, the existence of more than one OSG was unknown. In fact, Tatum has now revealed the existence of three OSGs. OSG-1 was headed by Ted Shackley and was "our anti-narcotics group".4 OSG-2 was the anti-terrorism group and OSG-3 was "our 'alignment' group". Tatum was originally posted to OSG-2 which was commanded by Col. Oliver North.
The third group, OSG-3, was commanded by Richard Secord. Following the exposure of Oliver North's role in Contragate in 1987, North resigned as head of OSG-2 and his spot was taken over by Secord. Tatum moved up to command OSG-3 at the same time. All three OSGs answered to those individuals who sat on the TIWG. General Colin Powell represented the Department of Defense; William Casey, the CIA; and Donald Gregg, the National Security Council. "FBI guys rotated in and out," Tatum says. "It was like they couldn't get anyone," he concludes. Representing British Intelligence was Sir Colin Figure. Formerly head of MI6, Sir Colin transferred in 1986 to become "Security Coordinator", one of the top slots at the Cabinet office under the premiership of Margaret Thatcher. He retired in 1989. Amiram Nir represented Israeli interests until his assassination by an "Archer" team led by Tatum-at the request of high-level Israeli individuals-in 1988.
Any of these six could "call a mission". In addition, George Bush could do likewise. Of significance, too, was the occasional representation on the TIWG of Lord Chalfont. The British lord was an adviser on "Mid-East affairs" between 1986 and 1990. From the moment Chip Tatum was recruited to the OSG, he was posted to upstate New York where he established a number of cover businesses.
One of these was Cedar Shores Estates, Inc.5 This was his base of operations throughout the next six years.6 It may be no more than sheer coincidence that the name of the company is similar to Cedar Holdings, a British company that had a relationship to former British Conservative Party Treasurer, Lord (Alistair) McAlpine. Author Peter Jones, in an unpublished book, looked in some detail at the business activities of this Conservative Party "Grey Eminence" and leading Freemason.7 Of no little interest was the author's detailed connections of numerous companies that he believed were involved in all manner of dark activities. Interestingly, these included a company called Leisure Circle that has a sinuous connection to Sir John Cuckney, one of the central figures of the Scott Inquiry into arms sales to Iraq.
Whilst these connections are admittedly tenuous, to say the least, it should be noted that Tatum's upstate New York operation was also involved in shipping the most sophisticated weapons across the border to Canada. Not least are the known connections between Oliver North's related gun-running operations that saw dirty money being laundered through the British Channel Islands and the London-based BCCI (Bank of Credit and Commerce International). Money laundering was one of the principal activities of Col. Oliver North.
THE "SUPERBILLS" STING
One operation of which Tatum has knowledge concerns the so-called "Superbills" or "Supernotes" sting. Years earlier, in the late '60s or early '70s, the CIA had secretly provided to the Shah of Iran a perfect set of printing plates that could reproduce US$100 bills without blemish. Also provided was an intaglio printing press. This special printing press ensures that the etched plate meets paper with tremendous force, creating the distinctive embossed feel of a genuine banknote. In addition, the Shah was also given the ink and banknote-quality paper, enabling him to produce perfect counterfeit US dollar banknotes. The Shah later fled Iran and left the plates and press behind in his confusion. The whole caboodle sat in the mint at Tehran, according to some experts.8
According to Tatum, a deal was arranged in the early to mid-'80s between VP George Bush, Panama's Manuel Noriega and the Iranian leadership. A sum of US$8 billion deposited in the Banco Nacional de Panama on behalf of Colombian cocaine king Pablo Escobar was "lent" to George Bush. Of this, US$4 billion was shipped by plane to Iran where it was exchanged at a ratio of one good bill for two counterfeit bills. On the return trip, the 707 aircraft's cargo container carried two shrink-wrapped pallets containing $4 billion each.
The 707 arrived at Howard/Albrook Air Force Base in Panama where the pallets were offloaded under armed guard of the Panamanian military. The counterfeit notes were re-deposited into Escobar's account at the Panama central bank. Under no circumstances could the counterfeit bills be permitted to leave the bank vault-for fear of devaluing the US currency with forged notes-and active steps would later be taken to ensure this. The other half of Escobar's "good" money was placed into the hands of Nana DeBusia, the grandson of Guyana's first democratic leader. DeBusia was chosen by the CIA's William Casey to launder the massive sum into numerous bank accounts under the joint signatures of VP George Bush and Director Casey.
The next leg of the operation was to retrieve the $4 billion exchanged with the Iranians for the Superbills. This was facilitated by the supply of military equipment, arms, ammunition and replacement parts for weapons systems. This part of the deal was arranged by Col. Oliver North on behalf of the CIA's William Casey. The results of these complex manoeuvres were twofold. On the one hand the CIA acquired $4 billion via the arms sales, for use in future black operations, without the need to rely on congressional oversight or authority. If later caught, Tatum says "...the CIA can report the source of funds as being from an arms transaction with Iran".
Some of these funds were then used to support the Contras, whilst the rest disappeared down the ultra-black hole of the Company's covert finances. Meanwhile, Nana DeBusia had begun laundering the remaining $4 billion through various banks, including the Vatican Bank.9 For his trouble, DeBusia was entitled to take a commission amounting to $200 million.
The remaining $3.8 billion was then secreted in private, numbered accounts around the globe and controlled by George Bush and William Casey. The operation was complete apart from some necessary mopping-up which occurred over the following years:
In 1989, Pablo Escobar was targeted by an intensive US-Colombian "War on Drugs" campaign. He fled into hiding, in fear of his life. Eventually, in 1993, he was tracked down and killed in a police shoot-out. A British TV documentary revealed that the "Cocaine King" was gunned down while attempting to escape and was probably unarmed. The campaign waged against Escobar ensured he could not withdraw the $8 billion in Superbills. Following his death, the quantity and quality of cocaine shipments from Colombia immediately increased manifoldly, giving lie to the "War on Drugs".
Also during 1989, Panama's General Noriega was captured in the US invasion of Panama. Noriega was later convicted and placed in US federal prison under constant guard to ensure his silence.10
Penultimately, Nana DeBusia was indicted on 32 counts including bank fraud and thereby effectively silenced.11
Earlier, in 1987, DCI William Casey died of a brain tumour-just days before he would have been required to attend the Senate hearings into the Contragate affair.
According to Tatum, only one figure emerged unscathed: George Bush, who alone retained control of $3.8 billion in laundered funds. Obviously, the CIA still retained control over the balance of their $4 billion share of the 'sting' operation. It is of considerable significance that this operation has been corroborated by another source whose credibility is not in question.12 This individual was present in Tehran during many of these events, and was later posted to another sensitive location in this connection. Moreover, it has additionally been revealed that Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) was heavily involved in the Superbills sting.
That BNL was an intrinsic part of Oliver North's so-called "Enterprise"-in reality, the OSGs of the Terrorist Incident Working Group-is beyond doubt.13 However, the question remains: What did George Bush intend to do with his 'black' $3.8 billion? What was the ultimate purpose of the operation? Perhaps some of the money was to be used to grease palms and otherwise finance Bush's bid for the presidency following the completion of President Reagan's second term. Maybe it was used to finance other lucrative projects. Perhaps it was to be used to inject financial muscle into another, grander scheme, of which Tatum has recently spoken, involving George Bush's "scope and mission" paper for a New World Order.
A copy of the "scoping" paper supplied to Tatum by George Bush outlines the formation of a Corporation whose purpose is to "...provide a central network of information, analysts and strategists on an international basis in pursuit of world order and economic stability". The "scope" of the Corporation involves four features:
Centralisation of informational services;
Analysis of data by region-specific analysts;
Provide recommendations based upon analysts' reports by international experts;
Provide international master plan for world growth and economic stability.
The Corporation is to be privately owned with a board of directors "consisting of twelve members, elected annually by the shareholders". In addition there are to be five departments: "Data Resources; Political Management; Economic Manage-ment; Military Management; Environmental Management".14
THE COMPLETE "BOSS HOGS" LIST
But it is in the realm of narcotics trafficking that Tatum is most vociferous. Part 1 of this article recounted the names of high-level US individuals, given to Tatum by Barry Adler Seal before he was killed in 1986. Seal called this the "Boss Hogs" List and it included senior individuals in 11 different countries who, Seal claimed, controlled the global narcotics network. The complete list is reprinted (including spelling mistakes), on the reverse of a flight log:15
EL SALVADOR
Duarte Balestaros Maty
HONDURAS
Suazo Cordoba Alverez
MEXICO
Salinas brothers Albrego
COUNTRY UNKNOWN
Santa Cruz Echeverri Bolinik
NICARAGUA
Colaro Borge Bermudez Commanders: Fernando Franklin Martin Chamoro Pastora Nora (a woman) Lacayo
ISRAEL
Rabin Kimchi Nir (P. Ben or Guatamalian [sic.] arms dealer for Israel) Harrari
COLOMBIA
Ochoa Leder Navarro Richardo Duran Sarmiento
SAUDI ARABIA
Fahd Prince B [Tatum believes this to be Prince Bandar]
IRAN
Gorba
PANAMA
Noriega & his brother Harrari
UNITED STATES
Casey Clair George Bush Singlab Kissinger Colby Haig Secord Gregg Weld Clairage Rodriguez Fernandez Peroot North
US STATES
Arkansas: Clinton Young Louisiana: Edwards (Barry's buddy) Marcellas family Kentucky: Gov. in pocket
FULL CIRCLE
In a very real sense, Chip Tatum's story has now gone full circle. In March 1996, Tatum wrote to former Director of Central Intelligence, William Colby. Readers will recall that it was Colby who originally recruited Tatum into the CIA in 1971 and set him on his career as a covert intelligence operator. Since that time, Tatum developed a fondness for the super-spook, and Colby, in turn, played the role of mentor. In his letter, Tatum asked Colby to write a foreword for his book, Operation Red Rock, which he had completed just two months earlier. But there was another purpose in writing to the former DCI.
Four years earlier, when Tatum resigned his OSG command, he had volunteered to plead guilty on a felony charge in order to discredit himself. This was part of Tatum's strategy of survival, as he was aware that one didn't resign this particular team and remain alive for long. The fact that he had collected a body of evidence (including video and audio tapes and other related documentation) as 'life insurance', gave muscle to his negotiation. At that time he had not planned to reveal any of the details that he has now provided. In the event, his offer was taken up and he served a prison sentence of just over one year. That is where matters should have ended.
However, having served his sentence-thus complying with his part of the agreement-both Tatum and his wife, Nancy, were subsequently arrested and charged with another misdemeanour. Tatum got angry. His letter to Colby stated: "I have always kept my word with you. I told you that I would discredit myself. I don't need your help to accomplish this. But to charge Nancy with a crime, and expect me to allow this, is beyond my comprehension." He angrily continued: "I know that North and Rodríguez are the fuel for this, but haven't you warned them that I wouldn't sit still for this?" He then added: "I do not blame you for this; I am disappointed that you have allowed the 'Pond Scum' to control you!"
There then followed a warning: "The second book that I have already started will contain my movements from 1980 through today. I will not only write about the missions but about the NWO [New World Order] timetable and planned events including a chronology." Ominously he added: "And I will name names. You must detach yourself from these people!"
Tatum then continued by outlining how he would enter evidence for his forthcoming trial and warning that if disallowed for reasons of classification, then "a Special Prosecutor will be required to investigate the information, and the videotape tells no lies." He added: "I also had stills and an audio clip of a meeting added to the video. Out of respect for you I have kept your name out to this point, but if you don't separate yourself from these terrorists I will have no choice but to reveal your involvement also.
Either way, the group will be exposed-by the media or by the investigating committee. Either way, they're out of gas!" Tatum closed the letter by saying: "Mr Colby-you've done too much for your country to be disgraced in the manner that these men will be." Less than two months later, the former DCI was reported missing. By Monday 6 May 1996, Colby's body was found. It was later reported that Colby died following a "canoeing" accident on the Wicomico River, Maryland. Tatum and many others (including this writer) doubt this.
Throughout his life, Colby had an all-abiding fear of water. It would have been entirely out of character for him to step voluntarily into a boat, let alone a canoe. Despite this, Colby's death officially remains an accident. This has come as no special surprise to Tatum, who recently stated to this writer: "I knew the OSG were bulletproof when one of our targets, a 25-year-old, was reported to have died of a heart attack. His name was Al-Jarrah." That, however, is another story.
POSTSCRIPT
At 3 pm on Friday 4 April 1997-shortly after publication of Part 1 of this article-Chip Tatum was roused from a mid-afternoon snooze and told to report to the warden of his prison. He was informed that he was being released-less than midway through his 27-month sentence-with immediate effect, following an appellate court decision that found his conviction by Judge Adams to be illegal.
The Tatums are now freely enjoying together the sunshine and cajun cooking of Florida, as Chip turns his attention to beginning a new career-his first real job-hunting in 26 years. "Spy stuff" will not form part of his job-search efforts. Meanwhile, he has written and published his Chronicles that detail many of his allegations.15
Endnotes:
1. Tarpley, Webster Griffin and Chaitkin, Anton, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography, Executive Intelligence Review, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
2. ibid.
3. Additional standing members were the Department of State and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NSDD-30 was classified "Secret". Now partly declassified, the redacted sections nominated NSC staffer Col. Oliver North responsibility for "antiterrorist operations". This included so-called "active measures" to "deter or pre-empt terrorist attack", and established the administrative framework for "CIA projects aimed at killing leaders of radical Islamic organizations". As such, it was an illegal presidential directive. My thanks to Steve Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, Washington, DC, for providing research extracts of these and other NSDDs drawn from Christopher Simpson's book, National Security Directives of the Reagan and Bush Administrations (Westview Press, San Francisco).
4. Shackley's involvement in the narcotics industry is legion. Not least, Col Bo Gritz-the most highly decorated Special Forces officer in history-has spoken of his encounter with the Burmese warlord Khun Sa. Housed in the centre of the "Golden Triangle", Khun Sa is one of the world's leading exporters of raw opium. In an interview captured on camera, the warlord stated that his primary contact in the heroin business was the CIA's very own Ted Shackley. Shackley worked closely with Mafia chief Santos Trafficante, according to Khun Sa.
5. Tatum has stated that it was routine for all the OSG operatives to establish their own businesses as "covers". Funding was provided as a line of credit with the Key Bank of Central New York, Watertown, New York state, by Republican Harry Hyde. The company was formed by attorney Ben Whittaker. Legal representation was through O'Hara and Crough in Syracuse, NY. Tatum also operated through a number of other similar "fronts". These included Progressive Structures, Inc., Irving Place Capital & Development, and American National Home Builders.
6. Tatum has provided me with a number of documents of this proprietary company, including details of incorporation, board minutes, bank statements, legal billings and copies of cashed cheques. In addition he has also provided documents relating to other front companies he was involved with.
7. Jones, Peter, The Obedience of Australia, privately published, 1995. This book covers in considerable detail Masonic business connections that are shadowy to say the least.
8. For additional details see the article by Fredric Dannen and Ira Silverman, published in the New Yorker, 23 October 1995.
9. Tatum says DeBusia laundered this sum through banks in London. Coincidences abound in this story and they may be no more than coincidences. However, I think it is worth citing Gerald James, former Chairman of Astra Plc and one of the principal figures in the Scott affair and arms sales to Iraq. In his book, In the Public Interest (Warner Books, 1996), Gerald James has reproduced an internal company memorandum referring to the massive British-Saudi Al Yamamah arms deal in which a sum of US$4 billion is mentioned in connection with a bribe to Saudi Prince Bandar, a nephew of King Fahd. The memorandum stated: "This 4 bil US was mentioned in connection with M. Thatcher's son." Interestingly, the sum of $3.8 billion is mentioned in the Kerry Report that looked into the Iran-Contra affair.
10. One of the principal prosecution witnesses against General Noriega was Gabriel Tabóada. Arguably, without Tabóada's testimony (he was regarded as the "star witness") the prosecution case against Noriega may well have failed. Tatum has provided this writer with a number of private letters and other documents written by Tobóada. These clearly show that Tobóada was "coached" by the prosecution in what to say and, more significantly, what not to say. Tobóada's correspondence makes it clear he was aware that the prosecution case against Noriega was severely flawed by perjury-a fact known to the prosecution team. Today, Tobóada lives in fear of his life-a state of affairs that the US Department of Justice dismisses out of hand.
11. Following the intervention of the CIA, DeBusia was acquitted on all counts. Effectively discredited, he will continue to maintain silence.
12. Private communication with this writer.
13. See Alan Friedman's The Spider's Web (Faber & Faber, 1993) for a more detailed role of BNL in the Contragate affair. I have been reliably informed that significant portions of Friedman's original manuscript were excised by a wary publisher.
14. It is impossible to judge the veracity of this document for a number of reasons. Principally, the name of the Corporation is not stated and the document itself is typed on blank A4 paper running to three pages. Readers must make of it what they will.
15. A copy of the original flight log is in this writer's possession.
16. The Tatum Chronicles, an A4-sized, softbound manuscript, can be ordered by credit card by telephoning (352) 330 1650 (in USA) or +1 (352) 330 1652 (outside USA). It is priced at USD$19.95 plus postage and handling. The Chronicles contain reproductions of Chip's flight logs with notes (front and back), along with an eye-opening commentary.
About the Author:
Born in England, David Guyatt is a freelance investigative journalist with the Heritage International Investigations group, whose former career in stockbroking and banking gave him the background that inspired his research into the shady world of international weapons financing, drug-running and money laundering. His current research interests are focused on military/intelligence mind-control programs and non-lethal weapons systems, as well as the hidden influence of elitist groups around the globe.
COMPELLING EVIDENCE THAT THE SEPTEMBER 11 TERRORIST ATTACKS IN THE USA WERE ORGANIZED, AT LEAST IN PART ,BY USA AUTHORITIES, AS AN EXCUSE TO START AN ALREADY PLANNED WAR IN SOUTH ASIA, AND AS AN EXCUSE TO BEGIN THE BIGGEST ATTACK ON CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE WEST SINCE THE FACIST ERA.
THIS EVIDENCE COMES IN 4 PARTS. PART 1 DEALS WITH EVIDENCE THAT THE PLAN TO ATTACK AFGHANISTAN WAS ALREADY IN PLACE WELL BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11. After reading all the evidence above and below, email us your comments! Please. Email address at bottom of web site!
PART 1
Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani diplomat has said that senior US officials told him in mid July, that they planned to attack Afghanistan by mid October, at the latest, before the winter snow set in. ( BBC report by by George Arney Sept 18, 2001).
People with military experience, and my own research into the timeline of previous, comparable military campaigns suggest that it would simply not be possible to organize a military operation on the scale of that launched by the USA against Afghanistan, in the space of 25 days, which was the time between September 11, and the beginning of the attack on Afghanistan. It doesn’t matter how angry the USA might have been, it’s just not logistically possible. There are those who have suggested that the USA is always ready to attack anybody at any time. This simply isn’t possible, even for a country with the powerful resources of the USA. As a comparison, the time taken for the USA to be ready to attack Iraq in 1991, was 4 1/2 months. The attack was not delayed by attempts to find a negotiated settlement. Negotiations took place during the time that the USA was preparing for its attack. The attack took place as soon as they were militarily capable of doing so.
And if it is to be suggested that the US military really is so astonishingly razor sharp, that it is able to organize an operation like this in 25 days, then this is wildy inconsistent with their unbelievable lack of readiness on the morning of September 11. This will be discussed in part 2, and cross referenced back to the point that I have just been making.
Thirdly, it is preposterous to suggest that the USA can have identified the culprit behind the September 11 attacks within the time, that they claim to have. While it’s reasonable that a list of suspects would immediately spring to mind, it is another matter to be so certain of someone’s guilt that you are prepared to attack another country on the basis of that suspicion. It is instructive to review the timeline of the "investigation" into September 11. Within a few hours, Bin Laden was already being named as the main suspect. Within 12 hours, it was being claimed that they were "almost certain" of Bin Laden’s guilt. Within a few days, they were proclaiming his guilt as 100% certain, using the expression, "his fingerprints everywhere", and were already threatening to attack Afghanistan. This is clearly ridiculous. It’s not even enough time to set up a committee to discuss the personnal and logistics of the investigation. This will be discussed in more detail in part 2, and again, cross referenced back to this point. But it is clear already, that at the very least, USA authorities didn’t care who did September 11. They were happy to use it as oppotunity to attack anyone at whom it was convenient to point the finger, and we have information which alleges that they were already making plans for Afghanistan.
These 3 points, when taken together, form a compelling scenario that the attack on Afghanistan was already planned prior to September 11. This does not, in itself provide absolute proof that the USA was involved in organising September 11, that will come in part 2, but it does already put it forward as the most plausible explanation. If we accept that the attack on Afghanistan was already planned, then, in order to believe that the USA was not involved in organising September 11, we have to believe that the most spectacular terrorist attack in history just happened to occur at a time which could not have been better, from a propaganda point of view, for a war which the USA had already planned. While this is possible, it isn’t really probable. It’s just too convenient.
It will clarify things, to list the possible scenarios, that arise at this point, assuming that we accept that plans were already in place to attack Afghanistan:
1) The USA had nothing to do with the September 11 attack, and was genuinely suprised by it, but saw the propaganda oppotunities for its forthcoming war, and considered this to be more important than identifying the real culprits.
2) The USA did not have anything to do with organising the attacks, but knew in advance that they were coming, and deliberately allowed them to happen, for propaganda reasons.
3)The USA was actively involved in planning September 11, as part of an integrated plan, which involved the coming war in Afghanistan.
While I have not yet presented specific evidence for any of these scenarios, common sense tells us, if we accept that the attack on Afghanistan was preplanned, then scenario 3 is the only plausible explanation. Scenarios 1 and 2 require us to believe that the convenient timing of the terrorist attacks was just by chance. In respect of scenario 2, it might be suggested that the date of mid October was itself, planned around the terrorist attack which they knew was coming. But this doesn’t make a lot of sense either, because the date of mid October is explained in a far more plausible manner, by the allegations of Niaz Naik, and we would have to believe that US intelligence about an attack which they were not involved in was so specific, that by July, two months before Sept 11, they were already planning the date of their attack on Afghanistan around it. This is highly improbable. If we accept that the attack on Afghanistan was already planned, then Scenario 3 is the only credible explanation. For us to deny that the attack on Afghanistan was already planned, we must believe 1) That Niaz Naik is lying. 2) That the US was able to organise the attack within a time which defies accepeted military logistics, and 3) That since they cannot possibly have known who the real culprit was, within a few hours, they chose Afghanistan simply because they wanted to be seen to be doing something, and Bin Laden was an easy scapegoat.
The evidence which is presented in part 2, will interweave with these scenarios with constant cross referencing, and demonstrates conclusively that active collusion by US authorties in the planning of the attacks is the only possible explanation.
PART 2
On the morning of September 11, the largest aviation crisis in the history of the world took place. Before continuing, it is relevant to examine the standard proceedures which take place in the event of a hijacking, the approach of an unauthorised or unidentified aircraft, the failure of communications, or any other unscheduled aviation activity, regardless of whether any immediate threat is perceived. The air force is alerted and jet fighters are put into the air immediately. According to a report on a Russian website, the commander in chief of the Russian air force says that such a situation can be responded to in about 1 minute. In fact, he said that the terrorist attack on Sept 11, should have been impossible to carry out, if normal security proceedures were in place, and claimed that Russia itself had easily dealt with a similar situation there, although he declined to give any details. The purpose of interception is to closely shadow the plane, thus giving exact information about its movements, possibly keeping radio contact, and perhaps learning more of the pilots situation or intentions. It also provides the oppotunity, but not the obligation, to force down or shoot down the plane, if it becomes apparrent that it’s intentions are hostile. Interception itself, is not an agressive move. There are standardised signals, which are part of the aviation code, which an airforce pilot will give to a civillian airliner if radio contact is unavailable. When pilots are off course and disorientated, the fighter pilot will guide them back to the correct course. But the airforce also has a record of having previously forced down, or shot down civillian aircraft which were behaving in a manner which was considered to be a deliberate agressive flouting of aviation rules, likely to present a danger. While the end result of September 11, large commercial airliners flying into buildings, is unprecedented, the events leading up to the crashes are routine. Planes off course, transponders not working, reports of hijackings. Such events are handled regularly by the US airforce with expert efficiency. Normally, interception of these planes would have been well and truly in place, before it became apparrent that their intentions were hostile. What is unusual about September 11 , is that these normal airforce proceedures, activated automatically, and without the need for high level authority simply didn’t happen. The routine proceedures were waived for every one of the planes involved.
The 4 hijacked planes were all being tracked on Federal Aviation Authority radar, and air traffic controllers across the country were in communication with each other. Since no junoir officer would have the authority to override the interception routines. the failure to activate them, can only have come from orders to that effect, from the very highest levels. In the case of the plane which struck the pentagon, United Airlines flight 77, It should have been intercepted, as it approached Washington, by fighters from Andrews airbase, a mere 10 miles from the pentagon. In fact in should have been intercepted a lot earlier than that. By 9.05 at the very latest, the Pentagon knew that two hijacked planes, had struck the world trade centre, and that at least one more hijacked plane was at large. It may not have been clear by this time, that flight 77 was headed to Washington, but it was clear that a terrorist attack of massive proportions was taking place, and that at least one more plane probably had intentions to strike somewhere. The fighters at Andrews airbase stayed on the ground. By 9.25 at the very latest, it was clear that this plane was headed to Washington. The Andrews airbase fighters stayed on the ground, and whichever squadron was responsible for covering the area where the plane was originally hijacked, had also failed to activate. At 9.41, just 2 minutes before the plane struck the pentagon, two F16 fighters from Langley airbase, were dispatched to intercept it. Langley airbase is 130 miles away!They had no hope whatsoever of intercepting it. Meanwhile the fighters at Andrews airbase stayed on the ground!The official story is that no fighters were available at Andrews that day. This is clearly a lie. The specific mandate of the fighters at Andrews airbase, is to protect WashingtonDC. And if none were available, how did they miraculously appear in the sky over Washinton DC, a few minutes after the pentagon was hit? And do they seriously expect us to believe that the Pentagon is only defended on a part time basis? Another official story is that, they thought at the time, that the plane was targeting the White House. So what? Isn't that even more reason to have activated the airforce? And if that's what they thought, why was the White House, not evacuated until 2 minutes after the Pentagon crash? As far as I can make out the timetable, that's about 10 minutes after the plane would have flown past the target, which they allegedly thought it was heading to! Overall, 45 minutes passed between the time that Flight 77’s transponder was turned off, (which is when automatic interception proceedures should have begun, even on a normal day), and the time that it crashed into the pentagon. That there was no interception, is all the more incredible, given that at the the time it’s transponder was turned off, it was already 10 minutes since one hijacked airliner, United airlines flight 175, had crashed into the world trade centre, and about 5 minutes, since it had become known, that a third plane, American airlines flight 11, had been hijacked. At 9.03, flight 11, also hit the world trade centre, and still no movement at Andrews. By 9.25, there was no doubt that flight 77 was headed to Washington, and still no movement at Andrews, and no evacuation of either the Pentagon or White House. But the Andrews fighters got into the air, and the evacuation of the White House took place, just for show it would seem, immediately after flight 77 had completed it’s mission. So this plane, at a time when a security crisis of huge proportions was taking place, was able to turn off its transponder, change course, and fly 300 miles, being tracked by radar the whole way, without being intercepted. And then approach the nations capital, fly past the white house, and crash into the pentagon, without even being challenged. At 10.10, it was known that a fourth plane, United airlines flight 93 had been hijacked. This was also spared the normal practice of interception. It crashed in Pensalvania at 10.37. (Note:There is some discrepency between different information sources, about the exact times involved with this one, I will confirm the exact time in a further update, once I can establish it for certain. )It’s difficult to say exactly what the official stories are, concerning the failure to intercept the two planes which hit the WTC, because the stories keep changing, but it is has been admitted by Norad that it was alerted to a hijacking as early as 8.35, but didn’t activate any airforce action until after the pentagon was hit, while at the same time admitting that interception of civilian aircraft by jet fighters is a routine proceedure. Their story regarding flight 93 is that they could have shot it down if they had wanted to. This is most unconvincing. If they "could have shot it down", then why hadn't they at least gone through the routine proceedure of intercepting it and checking it out? They had 27 minutes to do so, and after all, there had already been 3 suicide crashes that morning. Exactly how were they going to shoot it down? With a plane which wasn't there? With a long range missile, when interception by fighters would have been far more safe, and would have also provided the possibility of forcing it down, and also given the oppotunity to check with greater certainty that that was the only option? And when were they going to shoot it down? How long were they going to wait? Vice president Cheney, in response to questioning about this bizarre scenario, has deliberately tried to confuse interception with shooting down, trying to create the impression, that the reason nothing was done, was because officials were agonizingly biting their nails, over whether to take the dramatic step of shooting down a plane full of innocent civillians. Cheny knows very well that interception, while giving the oppotunity to shoot down the plane, does not commit one to that action. And also, at the same time that Cheny is spinning this smokescreen, they're telling us that the only reason interception didn't happen in the case of flight 77, is because no fighters were available at Andrews. Make up your minds!And also, that in the case of flight 93, that they "could have shot it down" even though no interception had taken place, which could only be interpreted as meaning that they were prepared to use a missile. If that's the case why such agonising over the process of interception? And how does Cheney's statement reconcile, with Norad's admission that interception is a routine proceedure?
There is no possible explanation for these events, and the extraordinarily garbled confusion of unconvincing cover up stories, except that to say that someone very high up in the Airforce or the Bush Administration was determined to nobble the air force and make sure that the attacks were successful. We will now turn our attention the president, and demonstrate conclusivley that he was involved.
At 8.46, as the first plane hit the world trade centre, the President was at a Florida elementary school, mingling with teachers and children. It is curious to say the least, that 14 minutes later, at 9.00, it seems that no one had informed the president of the emergency which was unfolding across the nation. Not only had the world trade centre been hit, air traffic controllers were aware of at least one more hijacked plane at large, and may have been aware of 2 by this time. It must have also been apparent by this time that the air force was standing idly by, waiving normal proceedures of intervention. At 9.00, the president had settled down with second grade children, and was reading about a litttle girls’s pet goat. At 9.05, two minutes after the second attack on the WTC, Andrew Card, the presidential chief of staff, whispered something in his ear. According to reporters at the scene, the president "turned briefly sombre. " Others who claim to have seen footage of this event describe his reaction as more like a nod of confirmation to something which he had been expecting. It becomes even more unbelievable. The president did not react by leaving the school, convening an emergency meeting, and intervening to ensure that the airforce did it’s job. He did not even mention the extraordinary events occurring in New York, but simply continued with the reading class, at the same time as, at 9.06, the NY police department was broadcasting "This was a terrorist attack. Notify the Pentagon" (NY Daily News Sept 12). The situation, then, at 9.05, is that at least 3 planes have been hijacked this morning, and are known to be on terrorist suicide missions, two have already struck their targets, with spectacular effect, at least one is known to be still in the air, the airforce is doing nothing, and the President, who has apparently only just been informed, decides to continue reading to children about a little girl’s pet goat!
He continued to read about pet goats for another 24 minutes!
In an interview for newsweek, Bush recalls the moment he was told. "I'm the commander in chief, and the country had just come under attack. " So why did he continue to find pet goats such a fascinating subject for the next 24 minutes? Doesn't this prove that at the very best, he's unfit to be in charge on matters of national security, and at the worst, indictable for treason?
By 9.30 the president had had enough of pet goats and decided that it might be time to say something about the terrorist attacks, but not to do anything about them. Rather than calling an emergency meeting, or taking direct command of the airforce, or at least demanding to know what the hell was going on with the airforce, he decided to stay at the school, and give a television address to the nation, to tell them what everybody already knew, that there had been an "apparrent terrorist attack". A totally useless response, a blatant evasion of his duty to do everything possible to take command of the situation, even at the same time as flight 77, known, more than half an hour ago to have been hijacked ,had now reached Washington, being tracked by radar, and the Andrews fighters were still on the ground. Bush either didn't know, and didn't want to know, or knew but didn't care. By 9.35, as the president was wasting his time with the pointless address to the nation, the third plane was over Washington, had flown past the white house and, all the time being tracked by radar, done a 360 degree turn over the Pentagon, which is not being evacuated, even though staff there have already heard about the twin attacks on the World trade centre, and were already nervous about also being a target, even before this plane approached Washington.
Forty minutes after the pentagon crash, when it became known that, yet another plane, Flight 93 had been hijacked, this was also not intercepted, and the president again failed to intervene in the treacherous inaction of the airforce. He was clearly involved in active collusion to ensure that the attacks were a success. To suggest that such actions were simply a result of incompetence and confusion is not credible. But for those who wish to cling to this implausible explanation of incompetence, I now cross reference back to part 1, and the point about it not being credible that the USA could organise the attack on Afghanistan in a mere 25 days. If we are asked to believe that the USA military is so razor sharp, that it can execute an operation of this type within a time that defies what is known to be logistically possible, then how can we be simultaneously expected to believe that the same country is capable of such a staggering, inconceivable level of incompetence, in instituting routine domestic security measures? It allowed, without even a challenge, the success of an attack, which the commander in chief of the Russian airforce claims, should have been impossible to carry out. Was this blundering, useless, confused thing, called the US airforce, suddenly, in the space of 25 days, transformed into a lethal, efficient fighting force, that has reduced the Taliban to nothing, in impressively quick time? The two scenarios are mutually exclusive. To give any credence whatsoever to the posibilty that the highly successful, and well organised attack on Afghanistan was organised in 25 days, as a response to September 11, we must then, on the balance of the evidence, accept the events of September 11 as conclusive proof of collusion, which creates the thorny problem of why there was a retaliatory response to something which USA authorities were themselves involved in. Or alternatively, if we are to give any credence whatsoever to the possibility that the events of September 11 were innocent incompetence on a staggering scale, we must be highly suspicious, to say the least, that the attack on Afghanistan was already into an advanced stage of planning by Sept 11, in which case we are again asking ourselves to believe that the most spectacular terrorist attack in history just happened, by co-incidence, to take place at a time which could not have been more convenient, from a propaganda point of view, for the already planned war. Just the raw facts of what actually happened on the morning of September 11 are by themselves enough to conclusively prove that USA authorities were involved in collusion. But there is a deeper pattern to the evidence which hammers this home even harder.
The pattern that is emerging, so far, is that if we wish to believe that USA authorities are innocent of any involvement in Septemeber 11, and that the attack on Afghanistan is genuinely a response to the events of that day, we find ourselves, in every aspect so far examined, in the awkward position of having to continually choose, one after the other, the scenario which common sense tells us is the least likely, rather than the most, further complicated by a tangle of mutually exclusive scenarios, whereas, when we postulate the opposite theory, everything falls into place, as perfectly obvious events. In the light of this evidence, there appears to be no rational, objective basis why we should not be suggesting with some confidence that USA authorities were involved in September 11, and had pre planned the attack on Afghanistan. The only basis for refusing to do so, seems to be based on preconceived bias, rather than a genuine attempt to examine the evidence objectively. And if it is to be claimed that the evidence for collusion, is over-ruled by a belief that no country would do that to its own citizens, then it must be pointed out that the contemplation of terrorist attacks on US citizens by the CIA is a matter of public record. The previously classified "Northwoods" document demonstrates that in 1962, the CIA seriously considered the possibility of carrying out terrorist attacks against US citizens, in order to blame it on Cuba. The plans were never implemented, but the favoured option was the shooting down of a US civilian airliner.
And there’s plenty more: The problem of the mutually exclusive scenarios regarding the competance, or lack of, concerning the US air force, repeats itself in relation to US intelligence services. How is it that they can have had no warning whatsoever of the largest, most difficult and complicated terrorist attack in the history of the world, but then be allegedly able to nail the culprit, almost beyond doubt, in less than a day, and beyond any doubt at all in 2 days? If they genuinely had no warning of the attack, then we can only assume that they are lying, when within 2 days, thay claim to be so confident of Bin Laden’s guilt, that they are already threatening to attack Afghanistan, in response. Or if they had some forwarning of the attack, even if it was not specific, if they were allegedly on the alert for "something" from Bin Laden, then the inaction of the president and the airforce on the morning of Semptember 11 is confirmed even more conclusively, if that’s possible, as collusion rather than incompetence. Strong supporting evidence for the allegation of forewarning and collusion, is presented by a curious aside to the Pentagon attack. The plane which flew into the Pentagon, had it done so a week earlier, would have flown into exactly the right spot to cripple the Pentagon’s key operations and kill many important senior staff. But, allegedly by fortunate co-incidence, the Pentagon had done a major reshuffle just a week before. (Source, CNN TV report on the morning of Sept 12, Australian time) All the important people and operations had moved to other side, and the unimportant people and operations had moved to the side which was hit. Very little real damage was done to the important operations of the pentagon. They swapped sides a week before the attack! This is powerful evidence that someone very high up in the Pentagon knew that the attack was coming. Once again, to postulate otherwise means choosing the least likely explanation on the basis of a preconceived conclusion. How many times are we prepared to do that?
Now, we turn in detail, to the totally unsubstantiated allegations against Osama Bin Laden:
Remember that from day 1, there has not been a shred of publicly available evidence against Bin Laden. We had, in fact, up until mid December, nothing but the continued repetition of his name, as if by repeating something often enough, we can somehow make it true.
Then came the video tape, which, is a complete joke. This is an age of technology where film of crystal clear quality can show Forest Gump shaking hands with JFK, where simulated cyclones can be animated into a movie set, where dinasours, extinct for 200 million years can be shown so clearly, that you would swear they were there. All this is done with such startling reality, that the only way we know it’s not true is that we have pre-existing knowledge that it’s a fake.
By comparison, the video tape of Bin Laden, is of such poor quality that we have no way of even knowing for sure whether it’s actually him on the tape. In feature movies of top quality, it is common practice to use a stand-in to replace the real actor for much of the filming. An extra of similar hight and build, is given the same clothing and hair style, and the two are virtually indistinguisable. Such a substitution would be even easier on a poor quality video. And when the main charachter has a long beard, a headress, and loose clothing, it's an absolute snap. On the Bin Laden tape, the poor quality prevents any analysis of whether the dialogue is genuinely live, or overdubbed. We also have had to rely on translations of dubious independence. The timeline of when and where the tape was allegedly made, and where it was allegedly found is also, although possible, somewhat perplexing.
Allegedly, it was made in Kandahar on November 9, and found in a house in Jalalbad. Jalalabad fell to anti-taliban forces on November 14. This means that there was only 4 days in which the newly made tape could have been taken from Kandahar to Jalalabad, which was already under fierce seige and serious threat by then. So, we are asked to believe that upon making the tape, someone almost immediately, for no apparrent reason, took it to Jalalbad, which was about to fall, and then conveniently left it there, to be found by anti taliban forces. It’s not impossible, but it does have the strong smell of a set up. Also, according to the Weekend Australian of Dec 15/16, the sequence of real time events had been reversed on the tape. This means it must have been edited. Why, and by whom? (A question not examineed by the press of course, although I suppose we should be grateful that at least it was reported.) Also, did the date stamp of Nov 9, as reported on television, refer to the date of the filming, or the date that the edited version was finalised? If it was the former, which would seem to be more likely, then this leaves even less time for it to have been taken from the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar to Jalalabad, which was on the point of being overrun. It's highly supicious. Or was it edited by US authorities? They've been forced to admit that the "translation" they've released is doctored. Of course they don't state it in those terms but try to cloud it in euphemisms. "The tape is NOT a verbatim translation of every word spoken during the meeting, but it does convey the messages and the information flow" says a department of defense spokesman. "The translation is what it is. We made it very clear that it's not a literal translation" says the pentagon. But will the pentagon work at a more complete translation? No. Will the full transcript be released to the public? No.
To be objective, none of this proves that the tape is a fake, but equally, it’s authenticity can hardly be claimed as proven either. And even if it is genuine, we've been given a selectively edited version of it. If this is the only evidence against Bin Laden, then the case is in an awful lot of trouble. And what other evidence is there?
It’s no surprise, therefore that no formal charges have been laid against Bin Laden. The normal practice of the law is that it’s neccesary to actually have evidence, in order to lay charges.
The irony, is that if the tape is genuine, it only serves to prove that Bin Laden was NOT the mastermind behind the attacks. While it would indicate that he had some prior knowledge of it, and was therefore, by definition involved in some capacity, he clearly states(if we accept the tape as clearly stating anything) that he was told about the impending the attack 5 days before it happened. If that’s the case, he can’t possibly have been the main organiser. Who told him about it? Presumably the person(s) who actually organised it, still unknown, but definitely not Bin Laden. In all the frenzied outrage against Bin Laden that this convenient tape has engendered, it seems that very few people have actually viewed the tape carefully enough to ask the important question that flows from Bin Laden’s admission to have been told about the attack 5 days in advance. Who actually organised it?
Tape or no tape, if we think clearly and logically about the likelihood of Bin Laden being involved, we actually find that it’s impossible, unless he was involved in the capacity of collusion with US authorities, or at best, in the context of the USA knowing all along what he was up to, and deliberately allowing him to do it. The point has already been made about the ridiculously short span of time which passed, before Bin Laden was pronounced guilty, and the fact that this sets up mutually exclusive scenarios. If he was involved, then it can’t have been a surprise, which in turn proves beyond any doubt that the inaction of the airforce and the president on September 11 was collusion, rather than incompetence. But the evidence doesn’t end there. It is curious to say the least, that no other suspect was ever even contemplated, however briefly (even though the US has plenty of enemies.) This becomes downright suspicious if we think clearly about the logistics of actually setting up a real inquiry into the events of September 11. Firstly, let’s put it in context. It took 17 years to catch the unabomber, and it took 7 weeks of investigation into September 11 merely to confirm the nationalities of the 19 alleged hijackers, while the person who masterminded the whole thing was allegedly known within a few hours. I don’t think so!
Now, imagine that we’re actually trying to set up an inquiry into September 11 in the first minutes after the attack, while the dust is still settling. And it would have had to have been literally, in the first minutes, because they claim to have had him nailed within a few hours. Who did this terrible thing? While a list of suspects might spring to mind, it’s not as if we could walk outside and see the letters "Bin Laden" written in clouds up in the sky. Was not Saddam Hussein also a suspect? Libya? A Palestinian group? Cuba? Russia? China? Local right wing militias? Anti-globalisation fanatics? Syria? Someone completely unknown and unexpected? etc etc. The list of possibilites which would spring to mind would be huge. Bin Laden would have only been one of these. Where do we start, in setting up such an inquiry? Firstly, we obviously need to recruit people with aviation expertise to the inquiry. But they must also be people with appropriate security clearances. Start drawing up a list of possible people who might be useful in this context. We need people with architectural expertise, to examine the exact nature of the collapse of the world trade centre. Was it only the planes which caused the collapse, or were explosives also used? Again start making a list. We need people who’s main field is airport security. Did someone in the airports deliberately let the hijackers through? Start drawing up a list. We need people with financial expertise to try to trace where some of the considerable funds needed for this operation came from. Start drawing up a list. We need to examine immigration records and cross reference these with the granting of pilot’s licences. We need an urgent review of internal security, in case it was an "inside job. " Such a review is a delicate operation to say the least.
As you can see, it’s quite a task, simply to start drawing up the lists of possible suspects, possible personnel for the inquiry, and the main angles of investigation for the inquiry.
Then all of these people have to contacted, and gotten together in a group, or at least hooked up with communications to each other. But hang on! Aircraft are grounded. Even the president's having trouble getting around. Many communication networks are down, many financial instutions closed, and large parts of New York and Washington are inaccessible. And the whole country's crawling with security blockades. How do we get hold of the people we want? How do we get them all together, and start delegating responsibilities? Did they all miraculously happen to have been hanging out together, in the one place, which was also the place where the inquiry co-ordinater was hanging out, so there was no need to wait till people could get back from other assignments, in various parts of the US, or overseas?
To have even drawn up a list of possible suspects, prospective personnel, and basic strategies for the inquiry, within 2 days, would have been an astonishing, perhaps impossible task, under these circumstances. To have actually held a meeting of the senior agents to be involved in the inquiry, within less than 3 days would probably have been impossible. And yet, by this time, the US had already claimed to have held it’s "inquiry" , and established Bin Laden’s guilt. How? Was anything, ever, more obviously, a set up?
And then, once the basic parameters of the inquiry were established, and the nuts and bolts of the everyday research and investigation were begun, in however many weeks it would have taken to get to that stage, it’s not as if all the inquiry personnel just sit around and say "what do we think? Bin Laden?" and everyone says "yeah", so the team leader phones the president and says "Bin Laden" and the president says"that’s good enough for me" and immediately threatens to attack Afghanistan. Extensive field work, and computer work would have to be done. The reports would have to be written up, summarised, checked for security clearances, printed, and given to the president and his top advisers, who would have to read at least the summaries, and then discuss them with the invetsigation panel. And all this was done in less than 12 hours, in a country which was in chaos and confusion at the time? This is one of the most preposterous suggestions of this whole affair.
And even in the unlikely event that any evidence whatsoever, could have been gathered in this time, it’s one thing to start to focus on a main suspect and feel that you may be getting close to a conclusion, but it’s another altogether to be so certain that you’re threatening a war over it. It simply isn’t possible. And even if it was, it again sets up the mutually exclusive scenario, of how someone could have organised such a huge operation in total secrecy, such that it took authorities completely by surprise, but at the same time have left his "fingerprints everywhere", evidence lying around in copious quantities, to the extent that guilt was obvious within a few hours, even under the difficult circumstances that Amercia found itself in, for several days after the attack.
Tony Blair confirmed that this whole thing is a lie, with a careless statement made at the beginning of November in response to polls showing that support for the war was falling in Britain. He said. "There is no doubt about Bin Laden’s guilt. The evidence against him, first a trickle, then a flow, has now become a torrent. " (World news page on nine MSN website)This statement was made nearly two months after Septemeber 11. The key words are "trickle", "flow" "now" and "torrent". Since they were already procaliaming Bin Laden almost certainly guilty, within a few hours, Blair is inadverdently admitting that it was a lie. Did the evidence progess from "trickle"to "flow" to "torrent" all in a few hours? This would seem a very strange way to describe such a process, especially, when the phrase was not employed until nearly two months later, and was described as "has NOW become a torrent. " So, he is inadverdantly admitting that they were already declaring Bin Laden guilty, and threatening Afghanistan, at a time when the evidence was still only a "trickle". His words after all, not mine!(They somehow knew at the time that it would become a "torrent" "later?) But a "torrent" of evidence is apparently still not sufficient to lay any formal charges, or release any of this "torrent" to the public?
An important question remains to be cleared up. The pilots were obviously on a suicide mission, which is known to be a common theme amongst Middle Eastern, Islamic terrorists, but totally foreign to American culture. It is difficult to believe that Americans, or those loyal to the US would knowingly participate in a suicide mission. But this doesn’t present any real problem for the scenario which has been postulated. The obvious explanation is that some of the hijackers were genuinely hostile to the USA, and were participating in an attack which they thought would damage the US, unaware that they were pawns in a double play, and were part of a larger CIA plan. In fact, in late November, media reports began to emerge, that some of the hijackers may not have been aware that they were about to participate in a suicide mission. I don’t know how this evidence has emerged, or what the basis of it is, but that’s what’s been reported. (ABC Newsradio report) This would fit very neatly with the rest of the information we have. Some of those who were not aware that they would be committing suicide, would have been the CIA operatives, probably ordered to set up the terrorists and take part in the hijacking, while being kept in the dark about the full extent of the plans, while those who were knowingly committing suicide, were those genuinely hostile to the USA. (If this is the case, the final moments of the black box flight recorder data, would make interesting listening, to say the least. Is this why it’s being kept so quiet?).
It is clear that this could not have been organised without the use of pawns, who thought that they were about to strike a blow against the US. This is where Bin Laden fits in. He deceived and sacrificed his own people in the same way that the Americans involved, deceived and sacrificed their's. The evidence that Bin Laden and the CIA are in active co-operation in this atrocity will become clearer in part 3. This might also explain the otherwise incomprensible scenario of Bin Laden producing an incriminating video tape, and then immediately taking it to a place where it was sure to fall into American hands.
PART 3
In fact, there is plenty of evidence to implicate Bin Laden, but the problem is that it also implicates the Bush Adminsitration, the CIA , George Bush senior, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and The United Arab Emirates. The official story about Bin Laden is that of terrorist monster, with a fanatical hatred of the USA and it’s allies, and as being estranged from the rest of his wealthy Saudi family, who are friendly to the USA. The terrorist monster part is correct, but the rest of it could not be further from the truth.
Bin Laden is well known as being a CIA operative. He had a close working relationship with the CIA in the 1980’s. This isn’t denied by anyone. The claim is that they have since fallen out, but this story is a lie.
For a start, many of the US military installations in the Middle east, to which Bin Laden allegedly has a violent objection, were actually built by Bin Laden’s construction company. There is a continuous history of close business ties between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family, stretching back more than a decade, and continuing to this day. (Wall Street Journal Sept 27 2001 and www.thedubyareport.com/bushbin.html ) The Bush Administration has attempted to throw a smokescreen over this by claiming that the rest of Bin Laden's family has disowned him, but as we shall see, this isn't true. The Bin Ladens are significant investors in the huge arms dealing firm Carlyle group which, by it’s own boast, stands to make a lot of money from the Afghanistan war. George Bush senior is a significant figure in Carlyle group. Other major investors, or senior executives include ex British PM, John Major, James A Baker, who was secretary of defence, under President Bush Sr., Colin Powell, and former secretary of defence and deputy CIA director Frank Carlucci, who is a fomer college classmate of current defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld. A quote from Carlyle's company profile at hoover's online.
"Carlyle's directorship reads like George W Bush's inaugural ball invite list. " "Can you say military-industrial complex? The Carlyle goup can. "
Neither can it be claimed that Bush senior was unaware of the Bin Laden’s shareholding. He has met the Bin Laden family at least twice, in 1998 and in 2000, long after Bin Laden had already been officially declared by the USA as the most wanted man in the world, for alleged terrorist activities. Why was George Bush Sr. meeting with this man's family, when the official story was that the Clinton administration had already declared its determination to eliminate Al Qaida and Bin Laden at any cost and by any means neccesary?
In 1995, US authorities named Bin Laden as a co-conspiritor in the 1993, WTC bombing. But a year after this accusation, when the Sudanese government had Bin Laden in custody and offered to extradite him to the US, the US govenement said it was not interested and told the Sudanese government to let him go to Afghanistan. Since then, the US government has declared Bin Laden as the main suspect in terrorist attacks on two US embassies, and for attacks against a US warship and a US military barracks in the the Middle East (one of those which Bin Laden’s construction company helped to build). And yet he was allowed to invest, via his family, in Carlyle group and George Bush senior was meeting with his family as recently as 2000. It is a lie that Bin Laden is estranged from his family. Bin Laden is known to have talked regularly with his mother and with other family members during this time of alleged estragement. In fact when Bin Laden was hospitalised in Dubai, in July 2001, he is known to have been visited by family members. And what was the most wanted terrorist in the world doing in a Dubai hospital anyway? Why wasn’t he immediately arrested, instead of being given hospital treatment, and then allowed to go free? During this hospitalisation, he was also allegedly visited by the local CIA agent, and by several prominent Saudis and Emiratis, also US allies. (Le Figero Nov 1 2001)
Furthermore, Bin Laden’s Al Qaida network, is known to have fought alongside Nato forces, in the Kosovo liberation army, a terrorist group supported by the CIA. It is no co-incidence that the Australian, David Hicks, who has been arrested for fighting for the Taliban, has fought for Al Qaida in both the Kosovo Liberation army, and the Taliban. So it appears that Bin Laden’s Al Qaida is our enemy in Afghanistan, but our ally in Yugoslavia. Apparrently, Al Qaida is a liberation force in Yugoslavia, but a terrorist group everywhere else. Furthermore, Pakistan, another of our allies in the "war against terror" has also long been a supporter of Al Qaida, and it is no coincidence that David Hicks also received training in Pakistan. And we already know that Sept 11 was at least partially funded by a Pakistani sheik, highly placed in the Pakistan secret service. He has not been indicted or even pursued. Given that it was known that Bin Laden’s family visited him in hospital in Dubai, it is curious that the Bush admistration and the media continue with the lie that he is estranged from his family. While this may be merely curious, it is scandalous that several members of the Bin Laden family were in the US on September 11, and were allowed to leave a few days later, without any questioning, given that the US had already declared Bin Laden guilty without trial (or even charge).
The FBI has repeatedly complained that it has been muzzled and restricted in its attempts to investigate matters connected to Bin Laden and Al Qaida, and has expressed frustration at the apparrent refusal to allow it to fully investigate the events of September 11. Enter Here) It will be no surprise if Bin Laden miraculously escapes to another country, giving the US the excuse to attack there. At the time of writing an update to this, (Dec 20 2001), my guess is Iran. Let's see if I'm right.
PART 4
Some miscellaneous peices of information, and observations, which contribute to the scenario outlined above. Normally, whenever an airplane is hijacked or crashes, there is extensive media coverage given to the recovery and examination of the black box flight recorders. I have followed this issue closely in the media, and do not recall at any stage, hearing even one word spoken about the black box data. This is highly unusual. Is this information being censored? A possible reason for this has already been alluded to.
In the first few hours after the attacks, there were immediately reports on CNN about insider trading on the New York stock exchange. That is, it seems that some very large investors had known in advance of the attacks and sold off before hand. There was media speculation that the terrorists involved, may have profited from their actions. For "terrorists", subsitute, "Bin Laden". Within a few hours, the media was already into an unquestioning hysteria of Bin Laden bashing. Bin Laden must have been insider trading, we were told. A tautological loop had already been established. Whoever had done the terrorist attacks had been insider trading. Since we knew that Bin Laden had done the attacks, then it must have been Bin Laden who was insider trading. Since we knew that Bin Laden had been insider trading, that proved he did the attacks. We were assuured that invstigators were already hot on the trail of this vital question. The figures on the New York stock exchange do seem to clearly indicate that SOMEONE was insider trading. But who? For authorities with full investigative powers, this should be one of the easier aspects of the investigation. And if it could be found who was insider trading, that gives us a good idea about who knew about the terrorist attacks before hand, which gives us a pretty good idea about who did it. Is is curious then, that this issue dissappeared from the media, almost as soon as it was raised, and was never heard of again, the bold promises that investigators were on to it -- forgotten as soon as they had been made. Surely, this would be the chance to nail Bin Laden’s guilt. And it is information which could be released publicly, because it would not have security implications. And yet this aspect of the investigation (if it is still proceeding at all) is being kept very quiet. One can only assume, that it began to turn up answers which US authorities did not want anyone to know. Given what we know about the close business relationship of the Bush and Bin Laden families, this is hardly surprising.
However, one financial fact which is known, is that a convicted Pakistani terrorist, highly placed in the Pakistani secret service (our allies in the "war against terror") wired $100,000 to Mahomed Atta, named as the leader of the Sept 11 group, shortly before September 11. (ABC Newsradio report)Although this fact is known, and publicly available, the USA is quite uninterested in pursuing any action against this person, in spite of President Bush’s huffing and puffing that "if you fund a terrorist, you are a terrorist." Not in the case of our allies, it seems. The Sheik was forced to resign his position, once his involvement in September 11 became known. Forced to resign? No retaliatory bombing of Pakistan until they hand him over? No labelling of Pakistan as a terrorist state? On the contrary, the USA is becoming quite cozy with the only country in the world (apart from itself), against whom there is incontravertible evidence of having been involved in September 11. The USA has been prepared to pound Afghanistan into the ground, despite having not a shred of evidence against Bin Laden, while showing a total lack of interest, in pursuing an individual whose complicity in September 11 has become a matter of public record, not denied by anyone. The US is also totally uninterested in pursuing the country which harbours him. In fact it considers that country to be a close ally in the war AGAINST terrorism!
On reflection, it is also curious how little real damage was done to the USA, by the September 11 attacks. It is worth reflecting on what probably could have been achieved by the hijackers, had they really wanted to do the maximum possible damage. It seems to me that a plan to organise the hijacking at such a time that they could have crashed a plane into the senate or congress while it was sitting, thus wiping out a significant part of the USA’s government in one hit, could have been just as easily achieved, as what they actually did on Sept 11. Or crashing the planes into a nuclear power plant, causing a catastrophic meltdown and release of radiation, as well as serious disruption to power supplies. It is not credible to suggest that these plans were not carried out, because they thought the security would be too tight, considering that they were confident enough to go for the pentagon.
In the final analysis, in spite of all the shock, horror, and grief caused by September 11, not one member of the US administration was killed, or injured, not even a single senator, congress member, or governor, or any local official. No damage was done to military capability, and no damage to power, trasnsport, communication or water supplies. In fact, the damage was so trivial, that the US was(allegedly) able to organise a war in record time, despite having had a plane crashed into the pentagon. (Funny about how that reshuffle a week before, meant that the Pentagon was able to get on with business, almost unhampered!) While the loss of (civillian) lives, and the symbolic and psychological damage to general public was enormous, in the larger scheme things, the attacks, while giving the US a huge propaganda weapon, made zero impact upon the USA’s ability to continue its role as an aggressive world superpower. This would seem to be an extraordinarily poor return, considering the near technical perfection of the operation, when the damage could have been devestating, simply by choosing the targets more sensibly.
IMPLICATIONS
It needs to be realised that the war in South Asia is more than just a continuation of US foreign policies which are estimated by disgruntled ex-CIA personal to have murdered (as of 1990 )a minimum of 6 million civillians around the world, in covert CIA operations ,over the previous 30 years, and to have , at any one time, been sponsoring terrorist organisations in around 50 countries. ("The Praetorian Guard" by John Stockwell) Up until now, people in the West have been safe. The game has now changed. Not only have they randomly murdered thousands of their own citizens, for the purpose of unleashing a new intensity in the wave of terrorism against people in South-Asia and the Middle East, but they are using those very same murders as a lever to reduce the rights and freedom of speech in the west, to levels not seen since the fascist era.
Consider the following domestic developments since September 11.
In the USA: Laws for indefinite detention without trial, charge or evidence, laws which any Third World dictator would be proud of. Unlimited power to monitor and freeze finances. Unlimited power to monitor and intercept email and internet traffic. Hugely increased funding for covert law enforcement agencies, as well as sweeping new powers of arrest, surveillance and telephone tapping. "Terrorist" organisations to be defined according to political belief not according to any evidence that they are prepared to use terrorism. My understanding is that anti-globalisation activists, such as Naomi Klein, can now be classified as terrorists under the new laws. I have been told that the president of the American Greens party is now banned from air travel. Foreigners accused of terrorism to be tried in military, rather than civilian courts, with no public scrutiny of the trial, and no right of appeal, and the power to monitor conversations between the accused and their solicitors. (That’s if they even get a trial)
In Britain: Tony Blair has attempted to introduce similar laws. The House of Lords has frustrated some of them, but nevertheless sweeping rollbacks of civil liberties have been acheived. A senior member of the British cabinet recently described civil liberties as an "airy fairy thing of the past, in the post-
September 11 world. "In Australia: laws for 48 hours detention of anyone, without legal representation, even if they are not suspected of terrorism, but may have information which might be useful. At the time of writing this, it had been recently announced that the Australian government will shortly freeze the finances of 200 individuals and organizations, decreed by the US PRESIDENT as being supporters of terrorism. My understanding is that there will be no charges, evidence, trial or right of appeal. In the west now, anybody who is accused of terrorism, automatically loses all civil rights, and anybody can be arbitarily accused.
Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin would approve enthusiastically.
All of this would be scary enough, even if it were genuinely an over-reaction to an act of foreign terrorism. When you realise that these laws are being drawn up by the same people who actually organised the act of terrorism which triggered it, the scenario is truly chilling.
And on the subject of the USA president, it should be noted that for the first time ever, the man who won the US election was not appointed president, while the man who LOST it, was. When this is added to the extraordinary resources which were poured into George W Bush’s republican nomination push, against other candidates, who were far better qualified to take on Gore, followed by an election which was clearly rigged, it becomes obvious that George W Bush was always going to be president, no matter what. It is therefore clear that this plan goes back well before November 2000. Whether or not the September 11 atrocities had been specifically planned by then, I can’t say, but it’s clear that the wider agenda had been. Note that the current, unelected president is the son of a man who is a major shareholder in the huge arms corporation Carlyle group, which is set to profit from this war, the same man who is an ex-director of the CIA which helped to put the Taliban in power in Afghanistan, and the same man who was meeting with Osama Bin Laden's (not estranged) family, presumably for business purposes, as recently as 2000. The scandalous aspect here, is that the President is the presumed heir to a fortune being amassed on the back of this war, and it would appear that the alleged target of the war is also set to make a tidy profit. Along with the secretary of state. A conflict, scripted by the protaganists, where they are the only people who don’t get hurt.
WHY?
The profit motivation for Carlyle group has been mentioned . In fact Donald Rumsfeld, is already telling European countries that they need to boost defence budgets. I'll bet that Carlyle group, and Rumsfeld's old buddy, the chairman of the company, will get a tidy share of it. Colin Powell appears to have the snout in the trough as well, unless he's severed all his former ties with Carlyle group and disposed of his shareholding, in which case I apologise. Can someone find out if this is the case?The president's father will certainly be making a lot of money, out of increased European defence budgets. (Incidently, Bush senior's grandfather was also an arms dealer, and didn't mind doing business with the Nazis.) But the wider agenda is the pursuit of the huge unexploited reserves of oil and gas under the Caspian sea. They are currently owned by Russia and Iran, I would suggest, not for much longer if the USA has it’s way. It has been US policy since at least 1996, that a pipeline to carry this gas and oil to the Indian ocean, for transport to the West, must be built through Afghanistan. Whoever controls Afghanistan, controls the Caspian sea reserves. For years now, US covert foreign policy has been to sponsor terrorist organisations in the south of the former Soviet Union, in order to nibble away the area of Russian territory which borders the Caspian sea, and Afghanistan. This process is now almost complete with breakaway governments having been succesfully formed in Kazakshtan, Turkemenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Krygyzstan, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Only the the area to the North of the last two, now needs to be broken off, for Russia to lose it’s territorial rights to the Caspian Sea. Please note that I have no problem, in principle with local regional governments being formed to free people from the hegemeony of large powers such as Russia, but the reality is that the local breakaway movements, which may have been genuine in their origin, have been distorted into self-interested terrorist movements by covert CIA action, and the new autonomous countries will now simply become subject to US hegemony, rather than Russian, and rather than being genuine expressions of local culture, identity and self determination, will be dominated by local tyrants and terrorists doing corrupt deals for the sake of their own power. The US is more than happy to talk business, in fact that’s the whole idea of setting up these local tyrants. Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, at the time, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, proudly described his policy achievements in Afghanistan, in the following terms:
The USA, by stirring up local uprisings, did everything possible to goad the Soviets into invading Afghanistan, and once it had achieved this, then backed the other side (The Taliban). This had a twofold purpose. It wasted Soviet resources in a long war of attrition, which they couldn’t win, and it destabilised a part of the world which was strategically important, to the USA
Some direct quotes from Brzezinski:
"We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would. "
"Regret what? The secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap, and you want me to regret it?The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to president Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving the USSR it’s Vietnam war."
So, the 20-year civil war which has ravaged Afghanistan, and caused such apalling death, poverty and misery, was a deliberate policy on the part of the USA, who backed the Taliban all the way through, and is now giving them, their final "reward. " Furthermore, the last quote from Brzezenski is a tacit admission that much of the antagonism towards the West, amongst Muslims, was deliberately engineered by the US, as part of its destabilisation plans for the Middle East and South Asia. I won't go into this, any further, but considerable coverage is given to this aspect of the history, at the first website referred to, at the end of this document. This US plan is so far-reaching that they may find it neccesary to pound the whole of South Asia into the ground, in order to achieve it. One way or another, they must control all of the aforementioned countries, as well as Iran and Pakistan. Some are likley to cave in out of a combination of intimidation and bribery, as is so far the case in Pakistan. Others may need to be attacked. The September 11 events gave the USA a blank cheque to attack any country in the world, simply by uttering the word "terrorist". The three latest countries(at the time of writing this) to be named as targets in the war against terror, are Yemen, Somalia and Sudan, three countries we’ve heard very little about, previously, in relation to terrorism. But surpise, surprise, one only needs to glance at a map of the world, to see their strategic significance. Somalia and Yemen, between them, form both sides of the mouth of the gulf of Aden, which is the entrance to the Red Sea, and the Suez Canal, and therefore, the shortest route, between Europe, and the Indian ocean, where it borders South Asia. Control of these countries, by the US would also place extra pressure on Saudi Arabia, and Eygpt to continue with US-friendly policies. Sudan forms most of the southern edge of the Red Sea. Iraq is strategic because it borders Iran on the west. The September 11 attacks also give the US and allies such as Britain, a blank cheque to roll back civil liberties to the extent that any of their own citizens, who might make a fuss, can be silenced, simply by uttering the word "terrorist". It also places extreme pressure on other allies, such as Australia to do the same. Presumably, they remember the bitter lesson they learned about the power of domestic opposition, during the Vietnam war. When President Bush said "You are with us or against us," it was a thinly veiled warning to every other country in the world, including Australia, that unless the US recieves absolute unquestioning obedience, anybody is fair game.
Doubtless, all world leaders, including Australia’s, have heard the message loud and clear. It would also appear that the ALP heard it loud and clear. During the election campaign, Kim Beazley was falling over himself, to make it clear that an ALP government would obey the US totally, and without question. His motivation may well have been more than simply oppotunistic electoral popularity. The USA’s actions in Afghanistan, are not only directly stategic, they are delivering a stark warning to every other country in the world, that they must be obeyed.
SOURCES
Anything which I've neglected to directly reference, can be found with full referencing on the web sites mentioned below, except for some things which were heard on the radio. Where possible, I've tried to write down at least some clues for these, so that a persistent searcher may be able to find them in Archives. This is not designed to be a serious academic work, with academic credentials. It’s designed to expose the truth. Those who wish to do the work to verify this information, in an academically acceptable format, will find it easy enough to do so. While the case does pivot around a number of key facts, a lot of it is also common-sense interpretation, of general knowledge. The Bush administration has left a huge trail of evidence about September 11. The main reason that it has not become obvious to the majority of people yet is, apart from the obvious influence of the media, that everyone has been too shocked by the speed and brutality of the events to think clearly. For myself, it took about 2 weeks for the shock to begin to wear off sufficiently, for things that should have been obvious at the time, to become so. Once the initial breakthrough is made, in this regard, the inconsistancies and implausible explanations begin to develop from a "trickle" to a "flow to a "torrent".
For example, this cracker was reported on the ninemsn website on Nov 28. An article saying that US officials had received information that Bin Laden may be planning a major terrorist attack on US energy facilities, in particular gas pipelines. However, the very same article reported that the "noose around Bin Laden’s neck" had tightened, to the point that he was pinned down to a 30 km2 area, running for his life, constantly on the move, in a desperate bid to avoid death or capture. Pardon me, but exactly how does anyone launch a sophisticated terrorist operation against targets on the other side of the world from this position? Only people in a deep state of shock could fail to see that this is a ridiculous lie. And the next day it was reported that he "may" have chemical or nuclear weapons (although they admitted, late in the article of course, that they didn’t actually have any evidence of this at all). So this man, allegedly desperately on the run, is carrying truckloads of intercontinental missiles and missile launchers, constantly between cave and cave? And they’re not being picked up by US spy sattelites, which we were earlier told could detect the faintest trace of heat in a cave where he may be hiding? Or does he have some sophisticated radio network, sending out instructions to supporters, to launch attacks from safe undisclosed locations? Signals which his supporters can pick up, from somewhere far away, not under US control, but somehow can’t be picked up by the US and British forces which have him surrounded, like a "noose around the neck"? The lies and inconsistencies in this campaign are so obvious, that I suspect that those behind it are going to need a sophisticated strategy of continuing to keep people in a state of constant shock, fear and confusion, otherwise the obvious truth will come out. The anthrax campaign springs to mind. And the continual false alarms about renewed attacks from Bin Laden(remember the golden gate bridge false alarm!), and continual, totally unsubstantiated rumour-mongering about nuclear or biological attacks. Soon there will be attacks on other countries, along with a torrent of propaganda about the terrorist threats from whatever villain is identified as the latest evil murderer, who must be hunted down at any cost. Perhaps Bin Laden has now outlived his usefulness and will now be killed, although it is more likely that he will conveniently escape to another country, giving the perfect excuse to for the US attack there.
This will all add to the confusion, the fear, the distraction. The ball must be kept rolling at any cost. If neccesary, they can always launch more terrorist attacks against their own people, to renew the shock and fear. After all, they are playing for the highest possible stakes. Not only what they stand to gain, which was their original motive, but now, given what they’ve done, Bush senior, Bush junior, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers and probably quite a few others, all face the possibility of charges of treason and murder and would almost certainly face death penalties.
I’m not sure what can be done, but the first step, is that people must know the truth. Our Investigations of the facts had to be done! Sincery, His End Time Watchmen
*** "In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the TIMID join him. For then it cost NOTHING to be a Patriot." Written by Mark Twain ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Patriot defined: A person who loves his country and zealously defends it and its interest. Written by Noah Webster 1828 ………………………………………………………………………………………………… A true Patriot is not anti-government, anti-religion or anti-racial but is anti-what is wrong in our society today. He will support any leader whether it is church or government, if they will uphold God's Law and the Constitution as originally written and abide by their powers. While vigorously opposing those that do not! Within a short time, maybe 100 years after The Bible and The Constitution were originally written, man took it upon himself to alter and change the original interpretations to meet his personal needs of desires, lust and greed. Remember too, "Satan's" (four hidden dynasties) that he uses to control mankind is; The Political System - Religious System - Financial System - Educational System. The "Religious System" has used the fear tactic, or fear God, rather than the original meaning of to reverence Him and Love Him. Through the hell fire doctrine, and other doctrines of man, not of God. The organized religious system managed to keep mankind in fear and darkness for centuries. Thereby controlling man. See Revelation 22:18-10 and Ephesians 6:10-18 Then go to: Enter Here> *The "Political System" has used politics in the forms of organization, legislation, taxation, education, the media, entertainment, finance and the religious system to control its citizens. Now since the 1940's, the greatest organization for controlling mankind has come into play. The UN (United Nations). The citizens of the World have been deceived from the beginning, into thinking that the United Nations is a peace organization, committed to solving conflicts before they start using "legislation" instead of war to solve international disputes. When in reality, the UN is one of if not the greatest threat to our liberty and freedom! See (Liberalism) at: Enter Here
The New World Order: Did you know that soon we would no longer be under the guidelines of the "Original Constitution! Read the TRUTH about the UN and study each and every link on this entire web site. Then you will finally get the whole picture that they did not want you to see! When you do, get the whole picture, will you be ready for a solution? Even if it means total commitment, for what you believe. Just as Jihad - Muslim's commitmentment. They believe and are willing to surrender their lives for their beliefs! It is time to think and act on your beliefs. Truth about the UN:Enter Here
Fellow Patriots: I have been called a "redneck" by many! So be it, everyone has freedom of thought, don't they? Some may feel a bit threatened by the actions that some of our operatives took this past week. But it was strictly for our own information! Two of our men polled or questioned with their permission, "100 Muslims" here in the US, Canada and Mexico. A Summary of the questions of their opinion and personal feelings on the attack on America and Jihad? Their ages ranged from 18 to 67 years of age and all men. Summary of answers: 93% or 93 out of 100 gave these answers in common. They all knew of the one-day coming Jihad. (Holy War against America). Most of them feel strongly that Usama bin Laden is the Savior or Prophet that was promised in their teachings, to lead the one billion Muslims in Jihad, prosperity and freedom from the influence and control of the infidel. The non-Muslim or Christian world that has held them captive for so long. We asked, how did we hold captive the now one billion or more Muslims and why? Not one had an answer! It was as if they were all hypnotized or programmed by their leaders to believe without question or proof. They also said that they are totally willing and will, when called to do so, give their body and life as a weapon to kill for Ala. (God) Just like the Japanese in world war two. We asked if this was a teaching of Muhammad and Islam or bin Laden and the Taliban. They said it was taught since they were young and never changed. They seemed to speak with total commitment and without any fear or conscience, as we understand it at all! Fellow Patriots, we are in big trouble! Or are we? Do you know any man more committed than a good old fashion American Patriot? Haven't we been fighting the battle of faith and truth with our very lives for hundreds of years? Have we really ever lost yet? NO! And now is not the time to start! We can and will fight them on there own terms. And bring the battle to their home grounds too! They made a big mistake thinking that they could scare God's children in this great Promised Land of ours into submission. There are a lot of wishers and talkers out there. But likewise, there are still some doers left that still enjoy our freedoms. Read again about all of you Heritage Soldiers of God:Enter Here and see where you really fit in! We, so called "red necks" PATRIOTS, I like better, have a lot of good "battle talent" among our ranks. Plenty of Guns munitions and know how. Because through the brothers and the NRA, we have continued standing up for our Constitutional rights. Even when great con artist like the "Clintons" tried to rob us of them and sell us out to The New World Order, an original communist organization. We have hi-tech computers, access to the same knowledge and satellite imaging that the military uses and I believe more guts and experience. Though some of our brothers are presently in uniform and protecting our Country the best way they can for now! Don't forget our brothers are in all walks of life! Bankers, lawyers, judges, doctors, nurses, teachers, ministers and preachers, cooks, law enforcement officers, military and don't forget the ones who feed us, dress our wounds and care for us both day and night with a silent love, "our wives". Yes, we are ready to back our Government in this fight against a very dangerous enemy! And we will protect our homeland, families, friends, government officials and every other true American in this land. Regardless of Race, Religion, Color or Creed. We will show the enemy, that we can and will have the highest moral standards in the world once again! We don't need roll models like the "Clintons" to influence and corrupt the morals of our children any longer. The Patriots soon will be singing "March on Christian Soldiers and the Battle Hymn of the Republic" once again. I feel it in my bones, don't you? The Heritage Group is yet a small group. You can read about our statement of purpose that we have lived by for over 30 years. Dear readers and good citizens of the World: As many of you know, we have been publishers of many Web-Sites in many languages around the World since 1999. We publish from all over the world.
Our main purpose and message is to inform all mankind of important world situations as they happen and where they fit in prophecy of today. As well as where we fit in Prophecy of today. To offer to the public valuable "FREE" software and services. To assist all mankind everywhere in the strugle for life, health, happiness, prosperity where and when possible. To investigate and fight against terrorism, crime and corruption world-wide. The on-line and private full time Study and Educattion regarding prophecy and where we are on "God's callender" today. To keep you informed on "news and many personal subjects" of interest to all, and to do our best in assisting the world to help maintain "peace and security" in troubled times. In this we have given it our all. Our time, health, finances and in many cases our own life.
We are a private, independent, and a self supporting organization. Most are well educated and trained in all fields of law enforcement, military, and private business and occupations of every major catagory in the world. We began our united world-wide venture to assist and observe mankind in 1968.
Our past and present force of independent operatives numbers 7,000 world-wide. Our group consist of all men except a team of two women.
When one dies or is killed, he is replaced with the best possible trained replacement.
Although our main occupation is International Private Investigations, we all specialize in many different fields or occupations. Therefore we have specialist in each professional field in order to be the best undercover or covert operatives.
Since 1970, by unanimous decision, we decided to keep most of our activities secret from the world. To this day, other than a few public law enforcement and government leaders and agencies throughout the world and former clients, except on a need to know basis, we have managed to remain anonymous.
Our parent company, Heritage International is a member of the United States Chamber of Commerce and most individual operatives are members in various professional trade organizations, societies, medical and legal organizations etc. We are registered with Dun & Bradstreet under a parent holding company name which is given out to clients only, on a need to know basis.
We have been totally self supporting and funded. No government grants, outstanding corporate loans or assets other than personal and individual small business office assets and homes. We are all independent agents and responsible for our our personal State or Country tax liabilities and licensing where and when necessary.
All of us are now over the age of 50 years and with Heritage for at least 25 years. Some of us like myself (Don Huard)are disabled due to on the job wounds and injuries while in the line of duty. I now only assist in the publishing of our web-sites and WWW distribution. Due to being self supporting and the decission to maintain low profiles in life, none of us are of any great financial wealth. Due to the recent terrorist activities, and past, our commitments to mankind and the on going world war, along with our international travel and investigations expences, we are nearly out of all personal and reserve funds, savings and past donations from former clients and services payments. Or accounts receivables as you might put it. As I mentioned, some of us suffer great pain daily due to disability, injuries and the continuece of our services which we are each totally dedicated and committed to no matter what it takes.
Ninety percent (90%) or more of our works to this day have been without pay, due to the nature and privacy of the investigations, the inability of individuals to pay for services rendered, as well as our duties and loyal commitments to mankind.
Even though many of us have been injured on duty, even unjustly at the hands of our own authorities sometimes, or military that we may have assisted, none of us has ever been involved or filed a civil suit or demand for funds do to liability of others at any time in our history. Law enforcement throughout the world have been legally liable in many of the situations too!
We ourselves suffered the pains both physical and financial in order to maintain our high standards and principles.
Any and all Federal, State, Local or Country civil suits that may ever have been lodged or filed against us over 30 years has been won in our favor. In most cases we acted pro-per or defended ourself or company without legal defence.
Truth always wins, is what we believe!
If you will take the time to read some of our web-sites, you will personally know what we are about and our commitment to man-kind. Each and every one of us always believe that God will take care of our needs. So without begging or borrowing, we feel that there are some readers out there that will hear and understand our financial needs.
In prayer and faith, we will waite to hear from you.
Meantime, everyone please keep us in your prayers. We are not getting any younger and we are trying to achieve what many feel may be impossible. I am sure you know what we are saying.
BROTHERS, we need to organize so quickly in 2002 that the enemy will never know where we came from! We need Generals with leadership abilities, Captains to mange men, Sergeants to teach men the battle plans and toughen them up! A Central communications and individuals with excellent computer and communications experience, health care professionals and soldiers that have no fear of this evil enemy we now confront. Then with all of the weapons, tools and equipment etc., we need a lot of "sincere and committed financial backers" that we can "depend on". As soon as we have a good crew of top men and organizers, we will contact each other and plan a place on the West Coast of the United States in a lower population area to meet and begin "training". Volunteers and financial backers, begin sending in donations to our PayPal Account now! Click on Logo below or on the "FREE Terrorist Survival Package Offer Page" and follow instructions.
For only $500.00 USD we will send you the "total plans along with the US addresses and tel. no.'s where to buy the parts in the USA to construct your own Electronic Mind Control or Brainwashing Unit. Itemized plans and everything you need for the total construction of your own unit. Total cost is only in the hundred's of dollars and not thousand's of dollars. The CIA and Military as well as the enemy has spent $billions to construct the very same electronic tools to control you. We spent millions! As a free bonus we will send you the total plans to construct a Brain wave receiver that will monitor all brain waves from Delta- .5 Hz, Theta wave- from 4 Hz, Alpha wave from- 8 Hz, Beta wave from- 13 Hz to abnormal Gamma wave of 26 Hz and up. With this unit you can control all of the brains inner and outer activisties totally! Now the final bonus is the total plans for a Electro Magnetic Frequency (ELF) wave Oscillator. You then can explore the effect of Low Frequency waves on the human mind via auditory stimulation. With tools like these in your hands, they will never gain control of you, your family and friends mind ever again. You can have them built by a computer or electronics technician or if you are a handy man, have all up and running in less than 90 days. This offer will be good for as long as the government allows! To purchase just go to the PayPal logo below in lower portion of this web site and click on it. Then send $500 USD by credit card, bank check, no COD's or set up your own free paypal account. Send to Email Address: sirdonald7@aol.com or sirdonald@37.com. After completing payment, just send Email to above Email to: sirdonald7@aol.com and in subject line enter your payment or order number and the date and time sent. Also your exact mailing address to send parcel by special delivery. Upon confirmation of payment from Paypal we will immediately post your parcel. Send extra if you want parcel insured. Our PayPal program is 100% secure! But if you want total confidentiality, just send and bank certified check for $500.00 USD to Heritage Works Trust at 200 Lakeland Drive, Lakeside, Oregon 97449 USA. Be sure to enclose all mailing instructions! True value is in the millions. For confidential and security reasons, we cannot send via Email or fax. US priority mail only! Once you built the first units, you can build more and sell retail at $2,195.00 each or wholesale at $1,395.00 each. Sell to Psychologist, Doctors, Clinics, Schools, Colleges, Wall Mart and many other businesses. You can protect you and your family and make a good income at the sames time. Act now before too many get the same idea. I built my own units and they are great. Security, mind control, protection and fun as well as profitable if you want. We would do it too, but we have too many programs on out plate now. We will design a web site that will promote and sell your business or products. And people will want to read and see your web site! For sure! You will have world-wide coverage at no extra cost! Your web site will be promoted and updated monthly and entered on over 1500 major search engines, 22,000 local search engines - millions of bullitin boards and advertising links and FFA pages world-wide. In short, the whole world will have access of what you have to say, sell, advertise and promote. We will set you up with your own company professional Email Address totally FREE for life of service. (A $99.00 a month value! Totally FREE) Billions will be made on the Internet this year! Get yopur peace of the action. Only those who take us serious today, will prosper tomorrow. The cost is the same for all. Initial set up is $150.00 usd and $50.00 a month for updates and continuous world-wide promotions. This is for a 1 year agreement. Cancel anytime if not 100% satisfied! Or just one time, $150.00 set up and $100.00 for 1 month at a time. All world-wide promotions disigned and entered onto the world-wide web two weeks after receipt of payment and instructions. All promotions will be pre-approved by you! Either way, you save hundreds or thousands of dollars with hi-tech advertising, over your present local advertising. Advertising that reaches hundreds of millions rather than just thousands. You will also increase your profits ten-fold. Start today, it is the way of the future and great prosperity. Time to stop thinking small and grow. Send letter of agreement and Company and or product particulars with set up fee and 1st month's payment by bank check, along with name and contack phone and Email if you have one. to Heritage Works Trust - 200 Lakeland Drive - Lakeside, Oregon 97449 USA Fed. ID # 93-6311525 Dun & Brad ID # 11 836 6681 Tel: 541-759-3280 Why Pay for Detective Services Secrets kept by you alone. Save $10's of thousands of dollars each year. Locate e-mails, phone numbers, or addresses.
Get a Copy of Your FBI file.
FIND DEBTORS and locate HIDDEN ASSETS.
Check DRIVING and CRIMINAL RECORDS.
Locate old classmates, missing family member, or a LONG LOST LOVE.
Do Background Checks on EMPLOYEES before you hire them.
Investigate your family history, birth, death and SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS!
Discover how UNLISTED phone numbers are located.
Check out your new or old LOVE INTEREST.
Verify your own CREDIT REPORTS so you can correct WRONG information.
Track anyone's Internet ACTIVITY; see the sites they visit.
Explore SECRET WEB SITES that conventional search engines have never found.
Discover little-known ways to make UNTRACEABLE PHONE CALLS.
Check ADOPTION records; locate MISSING CHILDREN or relatives.
Dig up information on your FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS, or BOSS!
Discover EMPLOYMENT opportunities from AROUND THE WORLD!
Locate transcripts and COURT ORDERS from all 50 states.
CLOAK your EMAIL so your true address can't be discovered.
Find out how much ALIMONY your neighbor is paying.
Discover how to check your phones for WIRETAPS.
Includes instant ONLINE UPDATES for 24 months
Abd Al-Rahim Muhammad Sa'id Ali Hasan
Khalid Ibn Muhammad
Al-Juhani Ramzi Binalshibh
VIDEO
2 minutes 11 seconds
mpg (29.1 mb)
rm (229 kb - stream)
asf (371 kb - stream)
Unknown Individual Three individuals appear in video clip. Their order of appearance is listed below:
Muhammad Sa'id Ali Hasan,
Abd Al-Rahim, and
Khalid Ibn Muhammad Al-Juhani.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FBI Home Page | Larger Images | Get Realplayer
Director's Statement| Seeking Information
IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION CONCERNING THESE PEOPLE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL FBI OFFICE OR THE NEAREST AMERICAN EMBASSY OR CONSULATE, OR SUBMIT A TIP VIA THE FBI TIPS AND PUBLIC LEADS FORM.
ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
DIRECTOR
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535
TELEPHONE: (202) 324-3000
These men may be in Canada or the USA now! Watch for them, there is a bounty on them too! We are Bounty Hunters here at Heritage.



Search the Bible:
in:
using:
Include Study Tools
HELP
Free search engine submission and placement services!