The American Scientific Revolution (of 1987)
Santa Barbara News-Press
Santa Barbara, California
Monday, March 9, 1987
Reader Views
Atom smasher collides with other research
Thank you for publishing the McClatchy News Service
article about the $4.4-billion super conducting supercollider
recently proposed by President Reagan.
Beside the issue of the "pork barrel" nature of this project
coming up for a siting decision four months before the
next presidential election, I wish here to raise the issue
of a potential "sciencegate" type coverup of information
invalidating the physics upon which it is based.
Since the University of California is coordinating California's
lobbying efforts to obtain this site, and since UC also
coordinates the laboratories which have developed all of
the U.S. nuclear weapons, I must ask why UCSB's Institute
for Theoretical Physics (whose research feeds the nuclear
weapons labs) has for over five years stonewalled the
discussion of new discoveries in physics which clearly indicate
that some fundamental concepts of modern physics are
incorrect and that particle physics must undergo thorough
re-interpretation.
Some of these new discoveries were discussed this past
weekend at UCSB in the California Student Solidarity
Conference workshop called "Revolutionary Energy
Alternatives" about new proven electrical power
technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power.
The work of Joseph Newman, who has the backing
of 30 technical experts and 11 U.S. congresspeople
in his fight for a U.S. patent, was presented along
with mention of the research of Santa Barbaran
Bruce E. DePalma.
Six months ago I submitted the reports from the
national government of India and Stanford University
professor emeritus Robert Kincheloe, which verify
the reality of DePalma's "n-Machine" discovery, to
UCSB's Institute for Theoretical Physics and Physics
Department.
Why has there been no response?
David Crockett Williams
Santa Barbara
---------end of retyped text