TIMELINE OF TREASON
APPENDIX B

IN THEIR
OWN WORDS
[PART b]

[Continued from PART a]

This Article "orders that the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States shall be
superior to STATE and LOCAL laws"! - BRUCE AND ESTHER FINDLAY [30]

[*NOTE: Get it, Folks? It does not say "NATION-State," i.e., United States, Canada, Russia, etc. It says"STATE," as in Ohio, Kentucky, California, etc. - OL]
***
"The progressive social philosophy of education generates confusion and fosters
disintegration. THE SCHOOL SHOULD NOT BE USED AS AN INSTRUMENT TO AGITATE FOR THE OVERTHROW OF EXISTING SOCIETY." - DEAN FRANCIS CROWLEY (Fordham University College of Education) [31]

MARCH

"...America is not allowed to win the war [Korean] though we were put into it by United
Nations action...The chief objective of this United Nations war is to produce a stalemate and
prolong the war instead of achieving victory. Thus, the United Nations in prolonging the war which
might otherwise be concluded acts as a menace to peace." - FRANK E. HOLMAN, President
(American Bar Association)
***
"I want to make one thing clear. THIS WAR AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION is not
being fought way off in Madagascar or in Mandalay. It is being fought here - in our schools, our
colleges, our churches, our women's clubs. It is being fought with our money, channeled throught
the State Department. It is being fought twenty-four hours a day - while we remain asleep.
"How many of you Senators know what the UN is doing to change the teaching of the
children in your own home town? The UN is at work there, every day and night, changing the
teachers, changing the teaching materials, changing the very words and tones - changing all the
essential ideas which we imagine our schools are teaching to our young folks.
"How in the name of Heaven are we to sit here, approve these programs, appropriate our
own people's money - for such outrageous 'orientation' of our own children, and of the men and
women who teach our children, in this Nation's schools?" - SENATOR WILLIAM JENNER [32]

APRIL

In April, Military Government Reserve Units hit Lampasas, Texas - taking over the town,
closing churches, bossing teachers, stationing guards in the classrooms, setting up
CONCENTRATION CAMPS, and jailing businessmen - after holding brief, one-sided trials without "habeas corpus"...The invaders put up posters listing many offenses for which citizens would be punished. One of them states:

"25. Publishing or circulating or having in his possession with intent to publish or circulate, any printed or written matter...hostile, detrimental, or disrespectful...to the government of any OTHER of the United Nations." - UN POSTER [33]

[*NOTE: WHY on earth are they doing this? IS THIS OUR FUTURE? If y'all think this idea is too far-fetched, then consider this: these (American) troops took down the U.S. flag and REPLACED IT with the UNITED NATIONS' flag! What was the purpose of this "exercise" and most importantly WHAT WAS THE MESSAGE? - OL]
***
A former Ambassador shocks Congress with his damning testimony:

"Chiang Kai-shek offered to send 30,000 troops immediately, just as soon as the attack
of the North Koreans took place. Our Government refused to accept them. He not only offered
30,000, he also offered to send as many more as we wanted. I would have taken a great quantity
of them, and put them into the fight, WE WOULD HAVE WON IT in the very early days..."
Senator Arthur V. Watkins (R-UT) then asks if the Free Chinese (Formosa) had a navy. Bullitt
replies: "Oh, yes. As a matter of fact, it has been quite an efficient force, although it is forbidden
to act in any way by fiat of our Government which has given orders to our fleet to prevent it from
stopping the Communist supply ships going up to Korea. They sail right by Formosa, loaded with
Soviet munitions...taking those weapons...TO BE USED TO KILL AMERICAN SOLDIERS in
Korea, and by order of our Government the Chinese Navy is flatly forbidden to stop them..."
Senator Watkins then asks if it hadn't been for that order, was the Chinese Navy powerful
enough to intercept and capture the ships. Bullitt answers without hesitation:
"Certainly, without question, without question." - WILLIAM C. BULLITT (CFR) (former US
Ambassador to both the USSR and France) [34]
***
"There is no possibility of doubting the fact that THE SOVIET OBJECTIVE IS ONE
WORLD..."* - ADLAI STEVENSON [35]

[*NOTE: Although our intelligence community repeatedly warns the President and our military, they choose to IGNORE this critical piece of data! - OL]
***
"The Eisenhower Administration, and particularly the US State Department, go all out to
defeat the [Bricker] Amendment. (WHY???) Leading the opposition is Secretary of State John FosterDulles..."Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law...[T]reaty law can
override the Constitution. Treaties, for example...can cut across the rights given* the people by
their constitutional Bill of Rights." - JOHN FOSTER DULLES (Secretary of State) [36]
***
On April 12th, "a map is adopted by the World Association of Parliamentarians for World
Government which shows how FOREIGN TROOPS WILL OCCUPY AND POLICE THE SIX
REGIONS INTO WHICH THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA WILL BE DIVIDED AS PART OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT PLAN." - DR. DENNIS L. CUDDY, Ph.D. [37]
***
"Although the Bricker Amendment started out with fifty-six co-sponsors, it eventually
goes down to defeat in the US Senate, 42-50, with 4 not voting...
"The defection of Senators William Knowland and Alexander Wiley from conservative
Republican ranks on this occasion is particularly significant, and marks the beginning not only of
Wiley's chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, but also THE DECLINE OF
THE MOVEMENT TO PUT AND KEEP AMERICA FIRST." - JUSTIN RAIMONDO [38] According to "The Congressional Record" the Amendment failed to pass by one vote. - OL

[*NOTE: To begin with, our constitutional Bill of Rights doesn't "give" us anything. It was instituted to PROTECT the rights that GOD gave us from the beginning. Therefore, Dulles is trying to override GOD himself! Secondly, Treaty law CANNOT "override the Constitution" - OL] Consider the following:

ARTICLE VI: THIS (the UNITED STATES) Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under
the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every
State shall be bound thereby any Thing in THE Constitution or Laws OF ANY STATE to the
Contrary notwithstanding."

[*International treaties do not override the US Constitution. We have been flim-flammed, Folks: The US Constitution overrides STATE Constitutions AND (in the United States) ALL international treaties. It's not a matter of interpretation. The US Constitution is very clear on this subject. And when in doubt, check it out:, the ORIGINAL INTENT of its authors is spelled out in many, many of our historical records! - OL] Below are a few examples:

"...By the general power to make treaties, the Constitution...must have meant to except
out of those the rights reserved to the states; for *surely the President and Senate cannot do BY
TREATY what the WHOLE GOVERNMENT IS INTERDICTED (prohibited) FROM DOING in any way." - THOMAS JEFFERSON [39]
***
"The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that IT SHALL NOT
CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION...On natural principles, a treaty which should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be NULL." - ALEXANDER HAMILTON [40]
***
"...A treaty to change the organization of the Government, or to ANNIHILATE ITS
SOVEREIGNTY, to overturn its REPUBLICAN form,W or to deprive it of its CONSTITUTIONAL powers, would be VOID; because it would destroy, what it was designed merely to fulfill, the will of the people." - SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JOSEPH STORY [41]

[*NOTE: But surely that is PRECISELY what our President(s), Vice-Presidents, and Secretaries-of-State HAVE been doing since the Civil War: piece-by-piece, treaty-by-treaty they have turned the governing of our people and our land over to the United Nations and the foreign bankers who now own/control our money, our natural resources, our schools, our media - and even our CHILDREN!! Now, why do you suppose the politicians and the "talking heads" constantly refer to our CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC as a "DEMOCRACY?" Answer: because they want the voters to associate the name "Republican" with "boring," "old-fashioned" and "repressive" - whereas "Democrats" are suppose torepresent "protection" of our "freedoms" and "civil rights!" - OL]

JULY

"If UNESCO is attacked on the grounds that it is helping to prepare the world's peoples
for world government, then it is an error to burst forth with apologetic statements and denials. Let
us face it: the job of UNESCO is to help create and promote the elements of world citizenship.
When faced with such a 'charge,' let us by all means affirm it from the housetops." - "THE
SATURDAY REVIEW" [42] 1953

"...THE SINGLE MOST POWERFUL EDUCATION FORCE IN THE WORLD is at 120th
Street and Broadway in New York City. YOUR CHILDREN'S TEACHERS GO THERE for
advanced training...With one hundred thousand (100,000) alumni, TC (TEACHERS COLLEGE) has managed to seat about one-third (1/3) of the presidents and deans now in office at accredited U.S. teacher training schools. Its graduates make up about twenty percent (20%) of all our public
school teachers. Over a fourth (1/4) of the superintendents of schools in the one hundred sixty-
eight (168) U.S. cities with at least fifty thousand (50,000)populationareTC-trained."-LAURENCE
CREMIN et al [43]
***
"Many of Dewey's educational disciples may be coy or confused, but the master himself
is clear enough in his writings about the implications of his philosophy. IT EXCLUDES GOD, THE
SOUL, AND ALL THE PROPS OF TRADITIONAL RELIGION. It excludes the possibility of
immutable truth, of fixed natural law, of permanent moral principles...Whether you like it or not,
THE EDUCATION BUREAUCRACY HAS RELIEVED YOU OF ALL BASIC DECISIONS about the aims and methods of the schooling in your town. The professors at the center of the system, who have been elected by nobody, control the qualifications of your teachers by fixing them in terms of their own course offerings..." - ALBERT LYND (former teacher) [44]
***
"I am in favor of world government, and of most of the other social aims that
reconstructionalism proposes; but I do not see how the schools can preach world government
unless the American people are willing to have this aim promoted in the schools. At the moment I
do not believe they are...A revolution cannot be brought about through the CONSCIOUS
inculcation (i.e., brainwashing) of revolutionary doctrine in the schools." - ROBERT HUTCHINS (A leading "progressive eeducator") [45]
***
"We must face the facts. Up-and-coming public school educationists are not talking
about substituting one scholarly discipline for another. They stopped talking about that years ago.
They are talking - as clearly as their antipathy for grammar and syntax - about THE
ELIMINATION OF ALL THE SCHOLARLY DISCIPLINES. Can we afford to entrust to men who think and act like this, the power to direct the first 12 years of American schooling?...the years in which young men and women must learn to think clearly and accurately if they are to learn to
think at all." - A. E. BESTOR [46]
***
"...I believe that a movement which abrogates to the educational profession - or to any
other profession or segment of our national life - the awful responsibility of 'social reconstruction,'
is SUBVERSIVE (i.e., treasonous)... that a movement which urges teachers, or any other group of
people, to 'DELIBERATELY REACH FOR POWER AND THEN MAKE THE MOST OF THEIR CONQUEST'*...is SUBVERSIVE. I believe that a movement which BELITTLES OLD,
INHERITED LOYALTIES, AND THE TRUTHS AND VALUES ESTABLISHED BY AGES OF HUMAN EXPERIENCE, is SUBVERSIVE. (And) I believe that a movement and philosophy which aims to CONVERT THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INTO AGENCIES FOR THE PROMOTION OF SUPER-NATIONAL AUTHORITY OR WORLD GOVERNMENT, and which URGES THE SYSTEMATIC ERADICATION - BEGINNING IN THE KINDERGARTEN - OF NATIONALISM (patriotism), decreeing that nationalism and the loyalties which it involves must go, is SUBVERSIVE." - REPRESENTATIVE PAUL SHAFER (MI 1927-1954) [47]

[*NOTE: Shafer is referring to a statement made by Dr. George Counts, professor of education at Columbia University, in his 1932 monograph, "Dare the School Build a New Social Order?":
"That the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest is my firm conviction. To the extent that they are permitted to fashion the curriculum and procedures of the school they will definitely and positively influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation." - DR. GEORGE COUNTS
Check that date again, folks: 1932. This is 2000! How far y'all reckon they've progressed today?! - OL]

***
"WORLD GOVERNMENT...is inevitable. It will be born in one of two ways. It may come
as a World Empire, with MASS ENSLAVEMENT imposed by the victor of World War III; or it may take the form of a World Federal Republic, established by GRADUAL INTEGRATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS." - GIUSEPPE ANTONIO BORGESE [48]
***
"Of course, you know that we at the executive level here were, at one time or another,
active in either the OSS, the State Department, or the European Economic Administration. During
those times, and without exception, WE OPERATED UNDER DIRECTIVES ISSUED BY THE
WHITE HOUSE. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives...The substance [of these
directives] was to the effect that we should make every effort to so ALTER LIFE IN THE UNITED STATES as to make possible A COMFORTABLE MERGER WITH THE SOVIET UNION." - H. ROWAN GAITHER (President of the Ford Foundation) [49]
***
"THERE IS NO SUCH THING...IN AMERICA AS AN INDEPENDENT PRESS. You know
it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did,
you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest
opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar
things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the
streets looking for another job.
"If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four
hours my occupation would be gone. THE BUSINESS OF THE JOURNALISTS IS TO DESTROY THE TRUTH; to LIE outright; to PERVERT; to VILIFY; to FAWN at the feet of mammon, and TO SELL HIS COUNTRY AND HIS RACE for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the TOOLS AND VASSALS OF RICH MEN BEHIND THE SCENES. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." - JOHN "The Dean of his Profession" SWINTONN (former Chief of Staff, "New York Times") [50]
***
Swinton's colleagues, on the other hand, are just as frank - some even going so far as to
boast about it:

"We are going to impose OUR AGENDA on the coverage by dealing with the issues and
subjects WE choose to deal with." - RICHARD M. COHAN (a Senior Producer of CBS political news)
***
"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what WE decide they ought to have." -
RICHARD SALANT (former President of CBS News)
***
"News reporters are certainly liberal (Socialists) and left of center." - WALTER CRONKITE
***
"The New York Times is deliberately pitched to the liberal (Socialist) point of view." -
HERMAN DISMORE (foreign editor of the N.Y. Times)
***
"The news media in general are liberals (socialists)." - BARBARA WALTERS

MAY

"From the rostrum of the UNITED NATIONS, we shall convince the colonial and
semicolonial people to liberate themselves and to SPREAD THE COMMUNIST THEORY ALL
OVER THE WORLD." - SOVIET GENERAL BONDARENKO (Lecture at the Frunze Military Academy in Moscow) [51]

JULY

"...by 'virtue of the authority vested in me' - G. K. HUMPHREY (Acting Secretary of the
Treasury) changes the name of the Bureau of the Internal Revenue, BIR, to Internal Revenue
Service - "TREASURY ORDER" 150-29 7/9/53
***
"In 1953, the Internal Revenue Service is created by the stroke of a pen...However, no
congressional or presidential authorization for making this change has been located, so the
source of authority has to originate elsewhere. Research to which IRS officials have acquiesced
suggests that the Secretary [is] exercising his authority as trustee of Puerto Rico, Trust #62
(Internal Revenue) (see 31 USC 1321), and as will be demonstrated, the Secretary does, in fact,
operate as Secretary of the Treasury, PUERTO RICO...
"By consulting the index for Chapter 3, Title 31 of the United States Code, one finds that
[the] IRS and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms are NOT listed as agencies of the
United States Department of the Treasury. The fact that Congress never created a 'Bureau of
Internal Revenue' is confirmed by publication in the Federal Register at 36 F.R. 849-890 [C.B. 1971 - 1,698], 36 F.R. 11946 [C.B. 1971 - 2,577], and 37 F.R. 489-490; and in Internal Revenue Manual 1100 at 1111.2 Implications are condemning both to IRS and third parties who knowingly participate in IRS-initiated scams: No legitimate authority resides in or emanates from an office which was not legitimately created and/or ordained (commissioned; appointed) either by state or national constitutions or by legislative enactment. See variously, "UNITED STATES v. GERMANE" [99 U.S. 508 (1879)]; "NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY" [118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1866)], etc., dating to "POPE v. COMMISSIONER" [138 F.2d 1006, 1009 (6th Cir. 1943)]..." - DAN MEADOR & THOMAS T. SCAMBOS, JR. [[52]
***
The Korean armistice agreement is signed on July 27th. General Clark, one of the
signatories, laments that he has: "...gained the unenviable distinction of being the first United States Army commander in history to sign an armistice without victory." - GENERAL MARK CLARK [53]

AUGUST

"None of the funds appropriated in this title shall be used - (1) to pay the United States
contribution to any international organization (i.e., the UN) which engages in the direct or indirect
promotion of the principle or doctrine of one world government or one world citizenship; (2) for the
promotion, direct or indirect, of the principle or doctrine of one world government or one world
citizenship." - "APPROPRIATIONS ACT of 1954" [54]

1954

Throughout the Fifties and the decades that follow, we are going to see the takeover of
the minds of our young - and how they did it. But, first, let's go back to the Thirties and review the
original plan, which came to light in 1954, during a Senate investigation:
"...THROUGH THE SCHOOLS OF THE WORLD we shall disseminate A NEW
CONCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT - one that will embrace all of the COLLECTIVE activities of men; one that will postulate the need for SCIENTIFIC CONTROL AND OPERATION OF
ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES in the interest of all people..." [This will be accomplished by]
"FIRST AND FOREMOST, the development of a NEW PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE AND
EDUCATION which will be fully appropriate to the new social order; SECOND, the building of an adequate plan for the production of A NEW RACE OF EDUCATIONAL WORKERS; THIRD, the making of NEW ACTIVITIES AND MATERIALS (no more "A,B,Cs"!) for the curriculum." - DR. HAROLD RUGG [55]
***
"...The 'Conclusions and Recommendations' of the American Historical Association's 17-
volume report on education...proposed to consolidate the traditional subjects of history,
geography, sociology, economics, political science, etc. into one composite course, called
'SOCIAL STUDIES'...Completely new textbooks were needed. Ruggs wrote them. ALL
TRADITIONAL PRESENTATIONS OF SUBJECT MATTER WAS SCRAPPED, and a variety of economic, political, historical, sociological, and geographical data was lumped into one
textbook...Five million school children 'learned' American political and economic history and
structure in the 1930s from 14 social studies textbooks Rugg authored. He also produced the
corresponding teachers' guides, courses outlines, and student workbooks." - CONGRESSIONAL
HEARINGS [56] Like so many "Liberals" Ruggs was too egotistical, and therefore, too radical. Not too surprisingly, his plan backfired:

"So blatant was the DOWNGRADING OF AMERICAN HEROES AND THE U.S.
CONSTITUTION, so pronounced was the ANTI-RELIGIOUS BIAS; so open was the
PROPAGANDA FOR SOCIALISTIC CONTROL of men's lives in Ruggs textbooks that the public rebelled... "In 1940, the NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (NEA) began promoting a set of 'SOCIAL STUDIES' texts known as the 'BUILDING AMERICA' series...[as] replacements for the discredited Rugg series. They had been widely adopted when a few years later the Senate Investigating Committee on Education of the California legislature condemned the NEA-sponsored series for subtly playing up MARXISM and DESTROYING AMERICAN TRADITIONS. The Senatecommittee report... '...found among other things that 113 COMMUNIST-FRONT ORGANIZATIONS had to do with some of the material in the book and that 50 COMMUNIST-FRONT AUTHORS were connected with it. Among the authors are BEATRICE AND SIDNEY WEBB, identified with the Fabian Socialist movement in Great Britain.' (The Webbs were playmates of Emma Lazarus - the author of "GIVE ME YOUR TIRED, YOUR POOR..." on the STATUE OF LIBERTY - OL) "Seven years after these disclosures, the texts were still in use in the school systems of several states." - CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS [57]
***
"In view of the absence of a class mentality among workers, it would be reasonable to
assume that it is the problem of eduation to induce such a mentality rather than to take an
existing mentality and base a course of action upon it." - "THE SOCIAL FRONTIER" 2/36
***
"This cruel and cynical admonition to the educators of America to purposefully promote
class strife and bitterness was an open acceptance of Lenin's strategy of 'INCITE ONE AGAINST ANOTHER'...Class hatred is induced in students by presenting American history as a prolonged class struggle." - JOHN A. STORMER [58]
***
"...social science, theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and
control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems...And THE BOOKKEEPER CAN BE
KING if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping. All science is
merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. THE END IS CONTROL. Beyond this
remains only one issue, 'who will be the beneficiary?...'
"In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called 'moral issues' were
raised, in view of the law of natural selection (evolution) it was agreed that a nation or world of
people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence.
SUCH PEOPLE ARE BEASTS OF BURDEN AND STEAKS ON THE TABLE BY CHOICE AND CONSENT...in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it is decided to privately wage a QUIET WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PUBLIC with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many
into the self-disciplined, responsible, and WORTHY FEW.
"In order to implement this objective, it is necessary to create, secure, and apply new
weapons which, as it turns out, are a class of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their
principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name 'SILENT
WEAPONS.'

"In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the lower class elements of the
society must be brought under total control, i.e., MUST BE HOUSE-BROKEN, TRAINED, AND ASSIGNED A YOKE and long-term social duties from an early age, before they have an
opportunity to QUESTION THE PROPRIETY of the matter. In order to achieve such conformity,
THE LOWER CLASS FAMILY UNIT MUST BE DISINTEGRATED by a process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment of government-operated day care centers for the occupationally orphaned children.
"The QUALITY OF EDUCATION to the lower class must be of the POOREST sort, so
that the moat of ignorance isolating the inferior class from the superior class is and remains
incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class
individuals have little - if any - hope of extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This
form of slavery is essential to maintaining some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility
FOR THE RULING UPPER CLASS

"When a 'silent weapon' is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts to its
presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via
economic) becomes too great and they crack up. Therefore, the 'silent weapon' is a type of
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social
energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses..." - "TOP SECRET:
SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS" [59]

[*NOTE: The public cannot understand this kind of weapon, or this kind of war, so they ignore any
questions or suspicions that arise - and dismiss those who try to warn them as "extremists" and "conspiracy nuts." And as the elite have predicted, THE PEOPLE DECIDE IT IS EASIER JUST NOT TO THINK ABOUT IT. After all, this is the Fifties, and this is America: the freest, most prosperous nation on earth. If something was going on, it would be all over the news - wouldn't it? - OL]
***
"Today the path to TOTAL DICTATORSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES can be laid by
strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or the people...We have a
well-organized political-action group in this country, DETERMINED TO DESTROY OUR
CONSTITUTION and establish a one-party state...(It has a) foothold within our Government, and its own propaganda apparatus...One may call this group by many names. Some people call it
socialism, some communism, some collectivism. I prefer to call it 'DEMOCRATIC
CENTRALISM'...The important point to remember about this group is not its ideology, but its
organization. It is a dynamic, aggresive, elite corps, forcing its way through every opening, to
make a breach for A COLLECTIVIST ONE-PARTY STATE.
"It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without our
suspecting the change is under way...This secret revolutionary corps understands well the power
to influence the people...by an elegant form of brainwashing...We see this, for example, in the
innocent USE OF WORDS LIKE 'DEMOCRACY' IN PLACE OF 'REPRESENTATIVE
GOVERNMENT' (Constitutional Republic)...It conducts tactical retreats but only the more surely to advance its own secret goal...I know...of the Alger Hisses who planned it that way...Dr. Wirt, of
my state, told us in 1934 that THE PLANS WERE ALL DRAWN, THE TIMETABLE
ESTABLISHED...The revolutionary cabal and its allies...designed the overall strategy. They broke
the whole up into precisely measured parts and carefully timed moves, which appeared to be
wholly unrelated... "Someone, somewhere, conceived the briliant strategy of REVOLUTION BY ASSEMBLY LINE. The pattern for total revolution was divided into separate parts, each of them as innocent, safe and familiar looking as possible. But...when the parts of a design are carefully cut to exact size, to fit other parts with a perfect fit in the final assembly, the parts must be made according to a blueprint drawn up in exact detail.
"The men who make the blueprints know exactly what the final product is to be...this
assembly line revolution is like a time-bomb...It is ready to go off, but it is not going to be set off
until the time is ripe, until a switch is pulled. The switch is not to be pulled UNTIL THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE CONDITIONED OR CONVINCED THAT RESISTANCE IS
HOPELESS..." - SENATOR WILLIAM JENNER (IN) (Speaking in support of the Bricker Amendment) [60]
***
"...perhaps COMMUNISTS had wormed their way so deeply into our government on both
the working and planning levels that they were able to exercise an inordinate degree of power in
shaping the course of America in the dangerous postwar era. I could not help wondering and
worrying whether we were faced with open enemies across the conference table and HIDDEN
ENEMIES who sat with us in our most secret councils." - GENERAL MARK CLARK [61]

[Continued in PART c]

SOURCES
30] 'YOUR RUGGED CONSTITUTION' by Bruce and Esther Findlay - Stanford University Press 1950
31] SPEECH at a Barnard College forum in New York City 2/52
32] "THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD" 3/20/52
33] 'GLOBAL TYRANNY...STEP BY STEP' by William F. Jasper - Western Islands 1992
34] Senate Internal Security Subcommittee - "INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC RELATIONS" (Hearings) 4/8/52 - "The
Congressional Record"
35] "FOREIGN AFFAIRS" 4/52
36] "TREATYMAKING AND NATIONAL UNITY" address delivered at the regional meeting of the American Bar
Association, Louisville, KY 4/11/52; recorded in "Treaties and Executive Agreements" (Hearings on S.J. Res. 1 & S.J.
Res. 43) 2/3/4/53 Y4.J89/2:T71/2
37] 'AMERICA 2000/GOALS 2000...' Id
38] "THE BRICKER AMENDMENT" by Justin Raimondo - Committee Against US Intervention in the Balkans
[http:\\www.antiwar.com\essays\bricker.html]
39] 'A MANUAL OF PARLIMENTARY PRACTICE' by Thomas Jefferson - Clark & Maynard 1873. A standard
handbook used in both the House and the Senate.
40] 'ALEXANDER HAMILTON AND THE FOUNDING OF THE NATION' by Richard B. Morris - The Dial Press 1957
41] 'TREATIES VERSUS THE CONSTITUTION' by Roger Lea MacBride - The Caxton Printers, Ltd. 1956
42] "THE CLIMATE OF FREEDOM" 7/19/52
43] 'A HISTORY OF TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY' by Laurence Cremin et al 1954
44] 'QUACKERY IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS' by Albert Lynd 1953
45] 'THE CONFLICT IN EDUCATION IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY' by Robert Hutchins 1953
46] 'EDUCATIONAL WASTELANDS' by A.E. Bestor 1953
47] 'THE TURNING OF THE TIDES' by Paul Shafer and John Howland Snow 1953
48] 'FOUNDATIONS OF THE WORLD REPUBLIC' - University of Chicago Press 1953
49] To Norman Dodd (father of Senator Chris Dodd), director of the Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt
Foundations - "The Congressional Record"
50] SPEECH before the New York Press Club 1953
51] As revealed by Colonel Jan Bukar (Czech intelligence officer who defected to the West) at Executive Hearings
before the House Committee on Un-American Activities, 5/13,14/53, "SOVIET SCHEDULE FOR WAR" - "The
Congressional Record" - United States Government Printing Office
52] "PUBLIC NOTICE..." Id
53] 'FROM THE DANUBE TO THE YALU' by Mark Clark - Harper & Brothers 1954
54] "APPROPRIATIONS ACT 1954" - Department of State, Justice, and Commerce , Public Law 195, Section 110 -
83rd Congress, 1st Session 8/5/53 - "The Congressional Record"
55] 'THE GREAT TECHNOLOGY' by Dr. Harold Rugg 1933
56] "SPECIAL HOUSE COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE TAX-EXEMPT FOUNDATIONS" (Hearings) - 83rd
Congress 1954 "The Congressional Record"
57] Id
58] 'NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON...' Id
59] "TOP SECRET: SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS" (an introductory programming manual - Operators
Research Technical Manual. Author(s) and training facilities unknown 5/79
60] "THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD" 2/23/54
61] 'FROM THE DANUBE TO THE YALU' Id

BACK TO PAGEUSA TIMELINE OF TREASON


JOSHUA REPORT HOMEPAGE