JOSHUA’S
NWO
HALL OF SHAME
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS!
"Once to every man
and nation, comes the moment to decide.
In the strife of truth with falsehood for the
good or evil side...
Then it is the brave man chooses, while the coward stands aside.
Til the multitudes make
virtue of the faith they had denied.
Though the cause of evil
prosper, yet 'tis truth alone is strong.
Though her portion be the scaffold and upon
the throne be wrong.
Yet that scaffold sways the future and behind the dim unknown
Standeth God within the
shadow, keeping watch above His own.”
JAMES
RUSSELL LOW
(Written about Slavery in 1845. Will today’s
American accept
enslavement once again?)
Part 5
(*
|
OBAMANATION "OBAMA learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's
model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community
organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to
SAUL ALINSKI, as we approach his 100th
birthday." - L. DAVID ALINSKY, (Son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky) * "TRUE REVOLUTIONARIES do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky
taught. They CUT THEIR HAIR, PUT ON SUITS, AND INFILTRATE THE SYSTEM FROM
WITHIN.. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was
to penetrate existing institutions such as CHURCHES, UNIONS and POLITICAL PARTIES...
"One Alinsky benefactor was WALL
STREET investment banker EUGENE
MEYER, who
served as CHAIRMAN
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE from
1930 to 1933. Meyer and his wife AGNES
co-owned “THE WASHINGTON POST.” They used their newspaper to promote Alinsky....Her series,
called 'The Orderly Revolution',
made Alinsky famous...
"Alinsky’s crowning achievement
was his recruitment of a young high school student named HILLARY RODHAM. She met Alinsky
through a radical CHURCH group.
Hillary wrote an analysis of Alinsky’s methods for her senior thesis at WELLESLEY COLLEGE…"Many leftists
view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some
issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say
whatever it takes to gain power. "BARACK OBAMA IS ALSO AN ALINSKYITE…Obama spent years teaching workshops on the
Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in
Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the DEVELOPING COMMUNITIES
PROJECT...Camouflage is key to
Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of Black churches
in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became
an instant churchgoer." – RICHARD POE (“Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky)
(11/27/07) * “For most of
the 20th century, we had municipal CHRISTMAS TREES,
public displays of CRECHES
and CHRISTMAS GREETINGS
uttered in shops and stores – and America was better for it. “I’m a JEW. I don’t celebrate
Christmas (though they tell me it commemorates the birthday of a Jewish kid).
But I’m not offended by those who do, yea, even publicly. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN
NATION. Christianity is
the glue that holds America together. As a patriot, I defend the public celebration of Christmas
as a public good. “Does anyone
in Israel object to municipal MENORAHS? Do they say, “Oh the
poor Moslems, they must feel so excluded”? ONLY IN AMERICA. “America
is the only nation that has made a fetish of sensitivity and
inclusiveness. But
we’re very selective about that to which we are sensitive. We can have full-frontal nudity and simulated moaning
and gasping on cable TV, but a MANGER scene on the
courthouse lawn is an affront to decency! “We can have
grade-school children indoctrinated
in the more bizarre aspects of the homosexual lifestyle - the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES can
tell a gay gathering that he longs for
the day when two men or two women living together are treated exactly the
same as mom and dad – but CHRISTMAS CAROLS are over the line. “Our
seasonal sensitivity samba is due in part to hyper-concern for the
sensibilities [of] some, and in
part to the fear of law suits. The ACLU is
ever vigilant to LIGHTED
TREES and
other attempts to establish a national church, and ready to pounce. “But there’s another, darker motive. The WAR ON CHRISTMAS is a War on JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MORALITY is a WAR ON AMERICA. Take our president – please! SEASONAL HOLIDAY” - An exclusive commentary
forGrassTopsUSA) (12/13/09) “OBAMA was
planning a ‘NON-RELIGIOUS
CHRISTMAS,’
White House Social Secretary DESIREE ROGERS told a gathering of her
predecessors earlier this month. That included not displaying the traditional
manger scene with other Christmas decorations. The administration later reversed
that decision, which apparently did not
play well in Peoria…” – DON FEDER (On The WAR ON
CHRISTMAS Excerpted from, “We Wish You A Merry MULTICULTURAL, INOFFENSIVE,
INCLUSIVE, SECULAR * The face of China's MAO
ZEDONG,
blamed for the deaths of 50 to 80 million of his countrymen, graces an
ornament on the WHITE
HOUSE CHRISTMAS TREE
for President Obama's first holiday season in residence.
According to BigGovernment.com, the tree also features an ornament adding Obama to MOUNT RUSHMORE! The images,
such as the "transvestite"
character "Hedda Lettuce," are attributed to the work of SIMON DOONAN,
creative director of BARNEY’S
NEW YORK,
whose previous projects have included MARGARET THATCHER as a dominatrix and DAN QUALE
as a ventriloquist's dummy, according to the New York Times. "Why
let a holiday season come between the White House and making some political
statements," Big Government's report asked. "These photos of ornaments on the White House Christmas tree in
the Blue Room were taken just days ago. Of course, Mao
has his place in the White House."
The Times
noted the White House's choice of Doonan to decorate this year was confirmed
by volunteers and florists who gathered to install annual displays…The report
follows a commentary from legendary martial arts champion, actor and
WorldNetDaily columnist CHUCK
NORRIS
on Obama's penchant for rejecting Christianity
and its symbols.” -
By Bob Unruh (“Holiday Blues” – ‘WorldNetDaily’) (12/22/09) * FIRST, even during his campaign for the presidency, OBAMA sarcastically belittled America's Judeo-Christian
heritage and degraded its adherents with trite remarks typical of any
atheistic antagonist: "Whatever we were, WE ARE NO LONGER A CHRISTIAN NATION;"
"The dangers of sectarianism are greater than ever;" "Religion
doesn't allow for compromise": "The SERMON ON THE MOUNT [is] a passage that is so radical
that our own
Defense Department wouldn't survive its application";
and "To base our policy making upon such commitments
[as MORAL ABSOLUTES]
would be a dangerous thing." (See the YouTube video: "Barack Obama
on the importance of a secular government.") SECOND,
PRESIDENT OBAMA has already denied America's rich Judeo-Christian heritage before the eyes and ears of other countries, as he publicly
declared in TURKEY on April 6,
2009,
for the whole world to hear: "WE DO NOT CONSIDER OURSELVES A
CHRISTIAN NATION."
(Who are the "WE" to whom he refers? Would our FORMER presidents
agree with his "WE"?) THIRD, quite contrary to OBAMA's
negative tone and sentiments about Judeo-Christian
belief,
in countless speeches over the past year he has sympathized and supported pro-Islamic theology and practice.. Just recently, he encouraged
Americans "not to jump to conclusions" about the FORT HOOD shooter
being a Muslim extremist. And he refused to say anything when the Muslim
extremist and President
of IRAN
publicly accused the U.S. of actively planning and plotting to stop
manklind’s “real savior:” i.e. MAHDI,
the imam that Muslims believe will be the ultimate savior of mankind. FOURTH, PRESIDENT
OBAMA
has enabled an anti-Christian agenda, unlike any former president, by
revising America's religious history, minimizing the role of religion today,
passing secular-progressive legislation and turning a blind eye to issues
like atheists' lawsuit to remove the national motto ("IN GOD WE TRUST") off of the walls of the new CAPITOL VISITORS CENTER in Washington, D.C., or the ACLU's
disposal of VETERAN
MEMORIAL CROSSES
in the MOJAVE DESERT and at MOUNT SOLEDAD.
Every time PRESIDENT
OBAMA
has had an opportunity to stand for CHRISTIANITY in any way, he has not only denied it but disdained it. A grave manifestation is OBAMACARE's
incorporation to use federal funds to pay for ABORTION
and thereby FORCE PEOPLE OF CONSCIENCE WHO ARE
PRO-LIFE TO PAY FOR THE TERMINATIONS OF LIFE IN
THE WOMB across
the country. (What a tragic piece of legislation to pass in the shadow of the
day when we celebrate the birth of the world's savior, JESUS CHRIST!)
What President Obama,
like many other liberal politicians, needs is a paradigm shift – a new way of
seeing America, which is really an old way. It's the way our founders viewed
America, and it incorporates a good ol' fashioned Christmas PROCLAMATION OF CHRIST’S BIRTH! That America is the one I outline in my new (January 2010)
paperback expansion of my New York Times best-seller,
"Black Belt Patriotism," which is ironically THE SAME CHRISTMAS GIFT
I’M SENDING TO THE PRESIDENT! And there is one gift that I propose the president give this
nation. Since Obama prides himself on being the
technological president, in lieu of his Christmas proclamation this year, I
suggest that he just send out across the nation the online link to a YouTube
video that I had posted under the title, “Ronald Reagan Christmas
Address (12/23/81)”
– CHUCK NORRIS (“Away With The Manger” –
WorldNetDaily) (12/20/09) * OPRAH Without question, OPRAH has
done tremendous good, touching the lives of millions in a positive way. And
for this I salute her. Because she has such a huge heart and compassion,
Oprah tends to take the emotionally liberal side of issues. However, though
well-intentioned, ignoring reality and human nature can be extremely
destructive. A common theme on Oprah's show is that EVERYONE IS A VICTIM OF SOMEBODY OR SOMETHING. Not
all abusers are the product of abuse. History proves some people are simply
evil, and some people are lazy losers. And WHY IN ALMOST TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF
BROADCASTING have we not seen ONE
CONSERVATIVE, "I
am NOT a victim of WHITE AMERICA" BLACK guest on the Oprah show? This is a
huge disservice to BLACK AMERICA. We Blacks (I am Black) are BLESSED to be born in the greatest land of
opportunity on the planet. And yet liberal icons are still filling the
heads of Black Youths with thoughts that THEY ARE VICTIMS OF A SEXIST,
RACIST, AND HOMOPHOBIC AMERICA. Despite
Oprah being possibly the RICHEST
WOMAN IN AMERICA and
America electing its FIRST
BLACK PRESIDENT, the branding of
Americans as RACIST is STRONGER than ever. “So Oprah, my dear friend, I
challenge you. You have announced your program will end in 2011. How about
doing a wonderful thing for not just for Black Americans, but ALL? In your
remaining programs, INVITE
BLACK CONSERVATIVES TO APPEAR AS GUESTS.” – LLLOYD MARCUS (Farewell Oprah:
How About A Gift To Black America Before You Go?) (11/23/09) * “She's the QUEEN of DAYTIME TV, and one of the
richest women in the world, but is OPRAH WINFREY
starting her own religion? The Kosciusko native is under fire for talking up some
controversial beliefs on her show. Winfrey said that she doesn't believe there
is one God, and is now promoting a book that says
Man made God. So
far, more than 3 million people have watched a YouTube video warning
Christians about a growing movement it claims is led by Winfrey. WINFREY's
latest BOOK
CLUB selection is by new
age author ECKART
TOLLE, who
claims GOD could be anything or anyone. It's a controversial belief, but it
isn't new. REVEREND
FRED HAMMOND
leads the UNITARIAN
UNIVERSALIST CHURCH of
Jackson. Winfrey's new idea that there
are many paths to God is one of the cornerstones of
universalism. "We are not focused on the
doctrine, but rather the character and how that person lives
their life as
being the true test of their faith," Hammond said. Hammond said that his
congregation is made up of MUSLIMS, JEWS, BUDDHISTS, CHRISTIANS and PAGANS. They are bound
together not by a book or creed, but by an agreement to follow SEVEN PRINCIPLES, which include COMPASSION and respect for
others. Hammond says UNIVERSALISTS believe how
you act on earth is
the cornerstone of their faith. Some UNIVERSALISTS don't believe in a HEAVEN per
se. "We try to say, 'I don't know if there's [a] heaven but if there is
one, that would be great and if there isn't a heaven,
that's okay.
I've had a wonderful life,'" Hammond said. Hammond, like Winfrey, came
to UNIVERSALISM after questioning CHRISTIANITY. He grew up METHODIST. Winfrey was raised as
a BAPTIST.
Hammond said he welcomes the debate Winfrey brings. "It opens the
doorway for people to start to think and engage their faith. Why do I believe
this? Is it because I am told, or because I have really wrestled with a
question and came up and said I believe
it’s true FOR ME," Hammond said.” – JACKSON NEWS
(WAPT.com – Jackson, MS) (2008) ORWELL “ POWER is
in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in TEARING HUMAN MINDS TO
PIECES and
putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you
begin to see then, WHAT KIND OF
WORLD WE ARE CREATING? It
is the exact opposite of the stupid
hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow
not less, but more merciless as it refines itself.
Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. The old civilizations
claimed that they were founded on love and justice. Ours is founded upon HATRED. In our world there
will be no emotions except fear,
rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we
shall DESTROY – everything. “ Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which
have survived from before the Revolution. We have CUT THE LINKS BETWEEN CHILD
AND PARENT, and between man and
man, and between MAN
AND WOMAN. No one dares TRUST A
WIFE OR A CHILD OR A FRIEND any longer. But in the future there will be no
wives and no friends. CHILDREN will be taken from
their mothers at birth, AS ONE TAKES
EGGS FROM A HEN. The SEX instinct will be eradicated. Procreation
will be an annual formality, like the
renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work
upon it now. “ There will be NO LOYALTY, except loyalty toward the PARTY. There will be NO
LOVE, except the love of BIG
BROTHER.
There will be NO LAUGHTER, except the laugh of triumph
over a defeated enemy.
There will be NO ART, NO LITERATURE, NO SCIENCE. When WE ARE OMNIPOTENT we shall have no more
need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be NO
CURIOSITY, NO ENJOYMENT OF THE
PROCESS OF LIFE. All
competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always – do not forget this,
Winston – always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler.
Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation
of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. IF YOU
WANT A PICTURE OF THE FUTURE, IMAGINE A
BOOT STAMPING ON A HUMAN FACE – FOREVER…” – ‘1984’ (“George Orwell” – real
name was Eric Arthur Blair. A one-time “insider” Orwell wrote of the very
real political and social circumstances of his day – and the very real plans
the imperialist elitists had for civilization.) (1949) (*Sounds vaguely familiar, doesn’t it? It seems we are
seeing many of the not-so-subtle-any-longer steps leading to the
International Mob’s long-dreamed-of-takeover in our time. And as for how it
all began, think back to these statements:
"We shall unleash the NIHILISTS* and the ATHEISTS, and we shall provoke a great social cataclysm, which in all its
horror will show clearly to all nations the effect of absolute atheism, the
origin of savagery and of most bloody turmoil. They everywhere the
people forced to defend themselves against the world minority revolutionaries will exterminate those DESTROYERS
OF CIVILIZATION. And the multitudes, disillusioned
with CHRISTIANITY, whose deistic spirits will be, from
that moment on without direction or leadership, and anxious for an ideal but without
knowledge of where to send its adoration, will receive the TRUE LIGHT through the universal manifestation
of the pure DOCTRINE OF LUCIFER
brought finally out into public view, a manifestation which will follow the destruction
of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." - ALBERT PIKE (letter - until
recently, to be found in the archives of the British Museum in London.) (8/15/1871) *
"Isn't the only
hope for the planet that the industrialized
civilizations COLLAPSE? Isn't it OUR* responsibility to
bring that about?" - MAURICE STRONG (Head of the Earth Summit in Rio de
Janeiro) (1992) ( * As you continue down this column,
you will see the many pieces coming together that will identify the
international mobsters of today – and their beginnings … all the way back to
the Old Testament! – OL) * "PACIFISM is objectively PRO-FASCIST. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of
one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real
way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In
practice, 'he
that is not with me is against me." – GEORGE ORWELL * " Political language...is designed to MAKE LIES SOUND TRUTHFUL, AND MURDER RESPECTABLE and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. " – GEORGE ORWELL " Power is not a means, it is an END. One
does not establish a DICTATORSHIP in order to safeguard a
revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. THE OBJECT OF PERSECUTION
IS PERSECUTION. The object of torture is torture. The object of
power is power. " * " WAR is a way of shattering to pieces,
or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea,
materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too INTELLIGENT. " OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (*CHARLOTTE ISERBYT is the consummate
whistleblower! Iserbyt served as SENIOR POLICY ADVISOR in the OFFICE OF
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND IMPROVEMENT (OERI), U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, during the
first REAGAN ADMINISTRATION, where she
first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control
curriculum in America's classrooms. ISERBYT is a former school board director in Camden,
Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of GUARDIANS OF EDUCATION FOR MAINE (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also
served in the AMERICAN RED CROSS on GUAM and
JAPAN during the KOREAN WAR, and in the UNITED STATES FOREIGN SERVICE in BELGIUM and
in the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. ISERBYT is a speaker
and writer, best known for her 1985 booklet 'BACK TO BASICS REFORM OR OBE: SKINNERIAN INTERNATIONAL
CURRICULUM' and her 1989 pamphlet 'SOVIETS
IN THE CLASSROOM: AMERICA’S LATEST EDUCATION FAD' which covered
the details of the U.S.-SOVIET
AND CARNEGIE-SOVIET EDUCATION AGREEMENTS (WHICH REMAIN
IN EFFECT TO THIS DAY) ! She is a freelance writer and
has had articles published in Human
Events, The Washington Times, The Bangor Daily News, and included
in the record of CONGRESSIONAL
HEARINGS. We are honored to have her as a part of P.A.G.E.USA! – OL) “…in 1932 a book was written by WILLIAM
FOSTER, the Chairman of the C0MMUNIST PARTY, U.S.A.
Every single thing that he recommended, including a UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION and NATIONALIZATION OF EDUCATION, etc. has taken place in
the schools of America. And the fact that GEORGE
BUSH wanted to hold onto the U.S.
DEPT. OF EDUCATION is proof that
he is implementing this agenda. And, as I said before, the FAITH-BASED
AGENDA... it was the CARNEGIE CORPORATION
that was the major player in the restructuring of our schools in the Eighties
and Nineties and presently. DAVID HORNBECK, WILLIAM SPADY
- not Carnegie but he carried out the CARNEGIE PLAN,
MR. OUTCOMES (Performance) BASED EDUCATION... I was in the FOREIGN
SERVICE for eighteen years and I lived all over the world and I know
what it is like to live under socialism and communism,
and I don't like this agenda of GEORGE BUSH's.
I especially don't like his FAITH-BASED AGENDA and
I don't like his SCHOOL CHOICE AGENDA, because
when you give tax money to the churches or you give tax money to private
education, that is exactly what happened in socialist/communist
countries...then YOU ARE TAKEN OVER BY THE GOVERNMENT
because of the money.
– CHARLOTTE ISERBYT (Author of
‘The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America...A Chronological Paper Trail’)
(Interview with Paul Anderson on “The Source” - KJRT Radio) (5/20/01) * MARC TUCKER, the master-mind behind today's global school-to-work system, explains the new education
system: "[Our objective] will require a CHANGE in the
prevailing culture - the ATTITUDES, VALUES, NORMS and ACCEPTED
WAYS of
doing things." – MARC TUCKER ("How We Plan
to Do It," Proposal to the New American School Development Corporation -
National Center for Education and the Economy) (7/9/92)
The "DEAR HILLARY" letter, written on Nov. 11, 1992 by Marc Tucker,
president of the NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATION AND THE ECONOMY (NCEE), lays
out a plan "to remold
the entire American system" into "a seamless web that literally extends from cradle to
grave and is
the same system for everyone," coordinated by "a system of
labor market boards
at the local, state and federal levels" where curriculum and "job matching" will be handled by counselors "accessing the
integrated computer-based program." Tucker's
plan would change the mission of the schools from teaching children academic
basics and knowledge to training them to serve the global economy in jobs
selected by workforce boards. NOTHING
IN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH TEACHING SCHOOLCHILDREN
HOW TO READ, WRITE, OR CALCULATE. (*Doesn’t that give one pause to wonder just what KINDS of jobs they are being “matched” for – in which they will
not be required to know how to read, write, or calculate?! – OL)
Tucker's ambitious plan was implemented in three laws passed by Congress and
signed by PRESIDENT
CLINTON in
1994: the GOALS
2000 ACT, the
SCHOOL-TO-WORK ACT, and the reauthorized ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY
EDUCATION ACT.
These laws establish the following mechanisms to restructure the public
schools: v BYPASS ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS
ON SCHOOL BOARDS AND IN STATE LEGISLATURES by making federal funds flow to the GOVERNOR and his appointees on workforce
development boards. v Use a computer
database, a.k.a. "A LABOR MARKET
INFORMATION SYSTEM," into
which school personnel would scan all information about every schoolchild and his family, identified by the
child's social security number: academic, medical, mental, psychological,
behavioral, and interrogations by counselors. The computerized data would be
available to the school, the government, and
future employers. * v Use "national
standards" and "national
testing" to
cement NATIONAL CONTROL of tests, assessments, school honors and rewards,
financial aid, and the CERTIFICATE
OF INITIAL MASTERY (CIM), which
is designed to replace the HIGH
SCHOOL DIPLOMA. (*Don’t forget: this CIM does not require that the
recipient know how to READ, WRITE, or CALCULATE when they “graduate”!! The
first American College, As for children being trained in the government
schools to “serve the global economy” that is a complete reversal of the
original intent of education in this country: HARVARD
in Cambridge was established in 1636 by vote of the Great and General Court
of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and was named for its first benefactor, JOHN
HARVARD of Charlestown, a young minister. During its early years, the
College offered a classic academic course based on the English university
model but consistent with the prevailing Puritan philosophy of the first
colonists. It was established
primarily to train ministers of the Gospel, and to evangelize the northern
Atlantic seaboard. For more than 200 years,
Harvard remained dedicated to CHRISTIAN education. EVERY HISTORICAL IVY
LEAGUE SCHOOL FOUNDED IN THIS NATION HAD THE SAME CHRISTIAN MORAL ROOTS. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, the 6th oldest school in our nation
announced it's opening in the New York
Mercury on June 3, 1754 by the following statement:
"THE CHIEF THING THAT IS AIMED AT IN THIS COLLEGE IS TO TEACH AND
ENGAGE THE CHILDREN TO KNOW GOD IN JESUS CHRIST AND TO LOVE AND SERVE HIM IN
ALL SOBRIETY, GODLINESS, AND RIGHTEOUSNESS OF LIFE, WITH PERFECT HEART AND A
WILLING MIND, AND TO TRAIN THEM UP IN ALL VIRTUOUS HABITS AND ALL SUCH USEFUL
KNOWLEDGE AS MAY RENDER THEM CREDITABLE TO THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS,
ORNAMENTS TO THEIR COUNTRY, AND USEFUL TO THE PUBLIC WEAL IN THEIR
GENERATIONS.” – JN SNOWDY (“Original Intent” -
AC: Associated Content.wps) (4/08/09) – OL) Designed
on the GERMAN SYSTEM, the TUCKER PLAN is to train children
in specific jobs to serve the workforce and the global economy (*as SLAVES! – OL), instead
of to educate them so they can make their OWN life choices…It needs
to be a system DRIVEN
BY CLIENT NEED$$ (not agency
regulations or the needs of the organization providing the services), guided
by clear standards that define the stages of the system for the people
who progress through it, and regulated on the basis of outcomes that PROVIDERS PRODUCE FOR THEIR CLIENTS,
not inputs into the system. take advantage of
legislation on which Congress has already been working to advance the and
secondary * "...the LAST
thing we want our children to be able to do is to live independently
of our society. We don't
want our graduates to have a SURVIVAL VALUE of 100%, because this would make
them FREE to opt out of our
carefully-constructed economic system and do whatever they please. We don't
want them to do whatever they please, we want them to have exactly two
choices (assuming they're not independently
wealthy). GET A JOB or GO TO
COLLEGE. "Either choice is
good for us, because we
need a constant supply of entry-level workers (*Slaves – OL) and we
also need doctors, lawyers, physicists, mathematicians, psychologists,
geologists, biologists, school teachers, and so on...Ninety-nine point nine
percent of our high school graduates make one of these two choices. And it
should be noted that our high-school graduates are reliably entry-level
workers. We want them to have to grab the LOWEST rung on the ladder (*As I said, “slaves” – OL). What sense would it make to
give them skills that would make it possible for them to grab the second rung
or the third rung?"
- DANIEL QUINN ["Schooling: The Hidden Agenda" - speech at a
home-schooling/unschooling conference (2000)]. * “.Is SCHOOL CHOICE a plot to implement the Socialist, Corporate, Fascist, Workforce training agenda for the GLOBAL
PLANNED ECONOMY?
You 'betcha! This decision will succeed in
carrying out the long-standing leftist/internationalist goal of Total Control of all Education (public and
private) through the Dollar. It provides a classic example of what the late SENATOR EDMUND
MUSKIE (D-ME) referred to when he
described how the Democrats, when they couldn't get something controversial
approved, would go to the Republicans for action. Muskie, known as "MR.
METRO," used as an example PRESIDENT NIXON's
implementation of METROPOLITAN/
REGIONAL Government (the UNCONSTITUTIONAL
carving of the nation into TEN
REGIONS), something the Democrats had been
unwilling or unable to tackle or accomplish… [PARENTS] should realize that [this] despicable situation has been
PLANNED FOR OVER 150 YEARS (the DUMBING DOWN was DELIBERATE...the HEGELIAN DIALECTIC at work), in order to get the parents to call for and
accept what is being sold to them as a solution providing freedom of choice,
which in fact is what the internationalists, especially the CARNEGIE CORPORATION, has had planned for at least 75 years. The CARNEGIE CORPORATION's PLAN to change our economic system from free market to collectivist was published in 1934 in its little book ‘CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES.’ Not only did PRESIDENT
REAGAN in 1985 sign agreements with PRESIDENT GORBACHEV to merge the UNITED STATES
and SOVIET EDUCATION SYSTEMS; the Carnegie
Corporation signed even more extensive
agreements with the SOVIET ACADEMY
OF SCIENCE to carry out the same agenda. Let me warn parents and private school
administrators: "Freedom to choose" is exactly the opposite
of what they and the private sector will receive if they take one penny of
federal, state or local tax money to educate children. Believe it or not, SLAVERY IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER, since once the private sector is controlled through
vouchers, thereby creating a partnership with government (CORPORATE
FASCISM), students , having been
psychologically profiled, will be tracked into specific training at an early
age and later into job slots to suit the needs of the CORPORATE SECTOR and the GLOBAL ECONOMY. That is the failed international
socialist quota system that
in essence provides NO CHOICE! Our
children will have no freedom to choose what THEY want for their futures. This is going on right now in the public school sector
due to GOALS 2000, the SCHOOL-TO-WORK OPPORTUNITIES ACT, and the
reauthorization of the ESEA (S.1, the BUSH-KENNEDY "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT.") Some
bright 9th graders are spending 3 out of 5 days a week at the JOB SITE, rather than studying Math, Science,
Literature, History, Foreign Languages, Art, Music, etc. which would give
them a LIBERAL ARTS education, indispensable for upward mobility, freedom,
and an understanding of the world in which they live. Ah...would that ARISTOTLE,
384-322 B.C., could return to express his displeasure with this latest
development. He said "Educated
men are as much superior to uneducated men as the living are to the
dead."
What SCHOOL CHOICE is all
about is not giving parents a real choice without strings attached; it is
about CONTROLLING ALL CHILDREN (REFERRED TO AS "HUMAN RESOURCES" !),
everywhere on this planet, in order to implement the FASCIST GLOBAL ECONOMY, with 100% participation in the GLOBAL COMPUTER! Why,
otherwise, does one find most of the major players and promoters of school
choice coming from the corporate sector, with the U.S. CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE as the largest and loudest
supporter of all? – CHARLOTTE ISERBYT (“Death
Sentence for Private and Home Education Courtesy of Supreme Court - NewsWithViews.com) (7/8/02) "Conclusions Not only did PRESIDENT
REA he Vision We take *the proposals Bill put before the country in
the campaign to be utterly con In other words, THE OLD CHRISTIAN WAYS AND VALUES
ARE OUT! The new, subjective postmodern ways are in. Already trained to follow FEELINGS rather than facts (and PEER CULTURE rather than
PARENTAL counsel) today's youth are marching happily toward an AMORAL (NO morals), PERMISSIVE (at least for the moment) COLLECTIVE SOCIETY. Many
have already internalized the ground rules for the DIALECTIC process: 1.
Seek "COMMON GROUND" in the midst of today's diversity 2. Show respect, TOLERANCE and appreciation
for ALL beliefs and values (*UNLESS they reflect BIBLICAL
truth – OL). 3. Train everyone to SHARE their
feelings, listen EMPATHETICALLY, and IDENTIFY WITH OPPOSING VIEWS, then
blissfully flow with the GROUP CONSENSUS. IT WORKS!
This process transforms individual thinkers into GROUP thinkers. Since the sense of belonging feels
good, the threat of group disapproval inhibits members from voicing "offensive" views. PANTHEISM “A POST-CHRISTIAN BELIEF
SYSTEM is taking over - one that sees the Earth as a living being
mythologically, as GAIA,
EARTH MOTHER - with mankind as her
consciousness...Such WORSHIP OF THE
UNIVERSE is properly called COSMOLATRY.” -
DONNA STEICHEN (‘Ungodly Rage’) —Donna Steichen, Ungodly
Rage, p. 237 * “The richness and DIVERSITY OF OUR RELIGIOUS
TRADITION* throughout history is a spiritual resource
long ignored by PEOPLE OF FAITH, who are often afraid
to open their minds to teachings first offered outside their own system of
belief. But the emergence of a civilization in which knowledge moves freely
and almost instantaneously throughout the world has…spurred a renewed
investigation of the wisdom distilled by all faiths. This PAN-RELIGIOUS perspective may prove especially important where
our global civilization’s responsibility for the EARTH is concerned.” - AL GORE (‘Earth
In The Balance) (*“Diversity” of WHOSE “religious tradition”? We all know you like to re-invent
history, Mr. Gore, but this isn’t the internet! According to our historical
documents, including the constitution of every one of our states back then,
AMERICA’S religious tradition is CHRISTIANITY – period! Nowhere in any
of our founding documents, or our original historical records will you find
Pantheism, Islam, Buddahism, nor even Secular Humanism. In fact, we weren’t
even Judeo at the beginning. Check out the original founding document:
the MAYFLOWER COMPACT! – OL) "PREHISTORIC* Europe and much of the world was based on the
worship of a single EARTH GODDESS, who was assumed to be
the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among all living things. Much
of the evidence for the existence of this primitive religion comes from the
many thousands of artifacts uncovered in ceremonial sites. These sites
are so widespread that they
seem to confirm the notion that a goddess religion was ubiquitous through much
of the world until the antecedents of today's religions, most of which still
have a distinctly masculine orientation...swept out of INDIA and the
NEAR EAST, almost obliterating belief in the goddess. The last vestige of
organized goddess worship was eliminated by CHRISTIANITY as late as the fifteenth
century in Lithuania.
Gore then quotes de CHARDIN, "'The fate of mankind, as well as of religion, depends upon the
emergence of a NEW FAITH in the future.’ Armed with such a faith, we might
find it possible to RESANCTIFY the earth..." Gore is also
fond of quoting an old Native Indian saying “Will you teach your
children what we have taught our children? That THE EARTH IS OUR MOTHER. What befalls the earth, befalls all
the sons of the earth. This we know - the earth does not belong to man, MAN BELONGS TO THE
EARTH.” - AL GORE (‘Earth In The Balance, pp 258-259) (*America’s history – as is the
history of every man, woman, or child who ever lived on this planet – began
in the GARDEN OF EDEN. There was no “Europe” until after the FLOOD and
worship of Mother Earth didn’t begin until then, either! And because we are so near the
prophetic End and the DAY OF JUDGEMENT, GOD (the one TRUE) has
increased our knowledge – and supplied EVIDENCE – for Creation. We now have
TONS of proof, affirming the Biblical record! What have YOU got for Gaia – or
Evolution? – OL) * In 1992 MAURICE STRONG was the Secretary General of the historic UNITED NATIONS (UNCED)
EARTH CONFERENCE in RIO.
This gathering featured an international cast of powerful figures in the
environmental movement, government, business, and entertainment. Maurice
Strong's wife HANNAH, was involved in the
NGO alternative meeting at the Summit called GLOBAL FORUM '92. The
DALAI LAMA opened the meeting
and, according to author GARY
KAH, to ensure the success
of the forum, Hanne Strong held a three-week vigil with WISDOMKEEPERS, a group of "GLOBAL TRANSFORMATIONALISTS."
Through round-the-clock sacred fire, drumbeat, and meditation, the group
helped hold the "energy pattern" for the duration of the summit. It was hoped
that an EARTH
CHARTER
would be the result of this event. This was not the case, however an
international agreement was adopted - AGENDA 21 -
which laid down the international "SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT" necessary to form a future Earth Charter agreement.
Maurice Strong hinted at the overtly pagan agenda proposed for a future Earth
Charter, when in his opening address to the Rio Conference delegates he said,
"It is the responsibility of each human being today to choose between
the Force of Darkness and the Force of Light." [note: ALICE BAILEY, and BLAVATSKY before her, used these
terms often. Their writings state that the 'Force of Darkness' are those who
adhere to the 'OUT-DATED' JUDEO-CHRISTIAN FAITH; those who continue
along their 'separative' paths of the ONE TRUE GOD. The 'Force of Light' (LUCIFER) in their view, is the
inclusive new age doctrine of a PAGAN PANTHEISTIC NEW WORLD RELIGION. In the NEW AGE OF AQUARIUS there will be no room
for the 'Force of Darkness' and 'Separativeness'.] "We must therefore
transform our attitudes and adopt a renewed respect for the SUPERIOR
LAWS OF DIVINE NATURE," Strong finished
with unanimous applause from the crowd. Despite the
disappointing setback of no official agreement toward a "PEOPLES
EARTH CHARTER,”
Maurice Strong forged ahead, with ROCKEFELLER BACKING, to
form his EARTH
COUNCIL
organization for the express purpose of helping governments implement UNCED's SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT,
which Agenda 21 had outlined. AGENDA 21 was perhaps the
biggest step taken to facilitate any future "enforcement" of a patently
pagan Earth Charter. According to Strong "the
Charter will stand on it's own. It will be in effect, to use an Anglo-Saxon
term, the MAGNA CARTA of
the people around the Earth. But, it will also, we hope, lead to action by
the governments through the United Nations." - TERRY MELANSON (The Earth Charter and the Ark of the Gaia Covenant – Illuminati
Conspiracy Archive) (11/6/01) * On September
the 9th, 2001 a celebration of the EARTH CHARTER was
held at SHELBURNE FARMS VERMONT for the unveiling of the Earth Charter's
final resting place. This "ARK OF HOPE" will be presented to
the UNITED NATIONS, along with its
contents in June of 2002. It is hoped that the United Nations will endorse
the Earth Charter document on this occasion; the tenth anniversary of the UNCED EARTH SUMMIT in RIO . Placed
within the Ark, along with the Earth Charter, were various items called "TEMENOS
BOOKS" and "TEMENOS
EARTH MASKS."
Temenos is a concept adopted by CARL JUNG to
denote a MAGIC
CIRCLE, a
sacred space where special rules and energies apply. Some of the Temenos
Books were created within this magic circle by CHILDREN, who filled them with
visual affirmations for MOTHER
EARTH.
Fashioned with the "earth elements", the Temenos Earth Masks were
also worn and created by children. Inside this
' Ark of Hope' the Earth Charter is handwritten on papyrus paper, and ready
for presentation to the United Nations; the Ark along with it's GAIA COMMANDMENTS "TEN
COMMANDMENTS" – a
new covenant to which Every Nation
Must Adhere. Each panel represents one of the five traditional
elements of pagan worship: WATER,
FIRE, EARTH, AIR and SPIRIT. According
to the Ark of Hope website, the Ark's dimensions are 49" X 32" X
32" and it was crafted out of a single Sycamore plank. THE OBVIOUS MEANING BEHIND THE ARK OF HOPE
IS TO MOCK GOD’S OWN TEN COMMANDMENTS AND THE ARK OF THE COVENANT. In
this context the choice of Sycamore wood for the Ark of Hope's construction
is a revealing one. The SYCAMORE
TREE was sacred to most all
the pagan religions in the middle east during biblical times, and in Egypt
especially: To the EGYPTIANS the Sycamore was a
healing tree; The tomb of OSIRIS was built in Sycamore
wood, and shaded by Sycamore trees; Burial in Sycamore coffins was a symbolic
return into the womb of the MOTHER
GODDESS; The
deceased hoped to live in the Sycamore tree. In the BOOK OF THE DEAD there are examples of
a letter the deceased would write to the GODDESS OF THE TREE,
containing a prayer so that she would provide water and air. The "FOR
LOVE OF EARTH"
day-long celebrations at Shelburne Farms Vermont began with an early morning
pilgrimage during which 2000 or so participants, led by SATISH KUMAR, walked to the "GREAT BARN" where they were
greeted by the sounds of the "SUN SONG" played by musician PAUL WINTER. The Pagan festivities
continued with the words of DR. JANE
GOODALL, SATISH KUMAR and
organizer DR.
STEVEN C. ROCKEFELLER. The
Earth worshippers were treated to dance, music and paintings of several
Vermont artists, after which they joined hands and offered an "EARTH
PRAYER" of
"reverence" and "commitment" to MOTHER EARTH and the "ARK OF
HOPE". Satish
Kumar, who led the early morning pilgrimage at Shelburne Farms, is an
influencial advocate of GAIA. Kumar says that
"contemporary thinkers of the GREEN MOVEMENT are collectively
developing an ecological world-view." The EARTH CHARTER is the green
movement's crowning achievement toward this holistic world-view, and the
practical means by which all of us will soon be held accountable to "DIVINE
NATURE."
According to Satish Kumar,2 this pagan view has
five ingredients: GAIA (JAMES LOVELOCK), DEEP ECOLOGY (ARNE NAESS), PERMACULTURE (BILL MOLLISON), BIOREGIONALISM (GARY SNYDER et al.),
and CREATION SPIRITUALITY (MATTHEW FOX).
"Creation Spirituality" is what had, undoubtedly, taken place at
the Shelburne Farms Earth Charter celebrations. In the words of STEVEN W. MOSHER, president of POPULATION RESEARCH
INSTITUTE: "GAIA is the New Age term
for MOTHER EARTH. The New Age believers
hold that the earth is a sentient (conscious) Super-being, kind of Goddess,
deserving of worship and, some say, HUMAN SACRIFICE (!!!).
Compared to GAIA worship, the simple ANIMISM
(Belief that mountains, rocks, earth, trees, etc. have souls and are
conscious) of primitive cultures is wholesome." ." - TERRY MELANSON (The Earth Charter and the Ark of the Gaia Covenant – Illuminati
Conspiracy Archive) (11/6/01) “The REAL GOAL of the EARTH
CHARTER is
that it will, in fact, become like the TEN COMMANDMENTS.” -
MAURICE STRONG * “Do not do unto the ENVIRONMENT of others what you do
not want done to your own ENVIRONMENT...My hope is that this CHARTER will
be a kind of TEN
COMMANDMENTS, a 'SERMON ON THE MOUNT', that provides a Guide for Human Behavior toward the ENVIRONMENT in the next century.” - MIKHAIL
GORBACHEV (“The Los Angeles Times”) (5/8/97) * Anyone
who has studied the GLOBAL GREEN MOVEMENT has no doubt heard of "GAIA."
Believers in Gaia, or ‘Gaians’ as they often refer to themselves, claim that
the earth is a sentient super-being, an ancient goddess spirit, deserving of
worship and reverence. SIR JAMES LOVELOCK,
in his book ‘GAIA: A new look at Life’,
states that “all of the lifeforms on this planet are a part of Gaia - part
of one spirit goddess that sustains life on earth. Since this transformation
into a living system the interventions of Gaia have brought about the
evolving diversity of living creatures on planet Earth.” Gaians teach
that the "Earth Goddess",
or Mother Earth, must be protected from destructive
human activity. It is this belief that fuels the environmental movement, sustainable
development, and a global push for the return of
industrialized nations to a more primitive way of life. GAIANS claim that “we are part of Nature
and Nature is part of us, therefore GOD IS PART OF US, AND GOD IS EVERYWHERE,
AND EVERYTHING IS GOD.” In reality Gaia is actually a
revival of the “EARTH-GODDESS”
found in many ancient pagan religions. The current GAIA
CULT is a cunning mixture of science,
paganism, eastern mysticism,
wicca and feminism. While researching this subject I
have been astounded by how many prominent environmental leaders, politicians,
scientists, and religious leaders profess a literal belief in Gaia. Gaians appear to have infiltrated every
level of power at the United Nations and risen to prominent positions in many
Governments. I strongly believe that THEY ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS AND DEVIOUS CULT ON THE
FACE OF THE PLANET. The
modern Gaia hypothesis was originally formulated by JAMES
LOVELOCK. Dr Lovelock is one of the world’s most famous and
influential scientists. He has degrees in numerous areas, including medicine,
chemistry and physics. Lovelock worked for NASA during the
1960's as a consultant to the VIKING SPACECRAFT PROJECT. His task was to
develop methods for DETECTING LIFE ON MARS. He claims that while searching
for suitable methods he realised that CONDITIONS THAT ALLOWED LIFE TO EXIST ON EARTH COULD NOT OCCUR
‘NATURALLY.’ THE SYSTEM IS SO WELL BALANCED AND
YET SO DYNAMIC, THAT LIFE ITSELF IS ACTING LIKE A SELF-REGULATING SENTIENT
SUP[ER-ORGANISM. He famously told NASA that there was
no possibility of life existing on Mars and they should cancel their mission.
Lovelock called his sentient, super-organism “GAIA,” after the ancient Greek Goddess of
the Earth. In Greek Mythology it was Gaia that “brought
Order out of Chaos”, a theme commonly quoted in Gaian
texts. Lovelock believed that humans were a key part of this organism. He
claimed that humans had evolved to a point where they had become Gaia’s “global
brain” and “she is now through us awake and aware
of herself. She has seen the reflection of her fair face through the eyes of
astronauts and the television cameras of orbiting spacecraft...” “Still more important is the implication that the EVOLUTION OF HUMANS, with his technological inventiveness and his
increasingly subtle communications network, has vastly increased Gaia's range
of perception. She is now through us awake and aware of herself. She has seen
the reflection of her fair face through the eyes of astronauts and the
television cameras of orbiting spacecraft. Our sensations of wonder and
pleasure, our capacity for conscious thought and speculation, our restless
curiosity and drive are hers to share. "What if “Mary” is another
name for GAIA? Then her capacity for virgin birth is no
miracle...it is a role of Gaia since life began...She is of this Universe
and, conceivably, A PART OF GOD. On Earth, she is the SOURCE OF
LIFE EVERLASTING and is alive now; SHE GAVE BIRTH TO HUMANKIND *and we are part of her." – SIR JAMES LOVELOCK (‘Ages
of Gaia’) (*This
kind of belief first requires acceptance of a scientific impossibility – such
as Evolution. And she obviously wasn’t very good at it: look how long it took
her and how many early models she had to destroy, in order to come up with
ONE specimen! Beyond that, how on earth do the Pantheists – “Gaians” – explain
the existence of the rest of the cosmos? And WHAT “god” is Gaia suppose to be
“a part of”? – OL) This new interrelationship
of Gaia with man is by no
means fully established; we are not yet a truly collective species, corralled
and tamed as an integral part of the biosphere, as we are as individual
creatures. It may be that the destiny of mankind is to become tamed, so that
the fierce, destructive, and greedy forces of tribalism and nationalism are
fused into a compulsive urge to belong to the COMMONWEALTH OF ALL CREATURES WHICH
CONSTITUTES GAIA.” – JAMES LOVELOCK (‘Gaia: A New Look at Life’) (1972) * GAIA worship
is at the very heart of the GLOBAL
GREEN AGENDA. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, AGENDA 21,
the EARTH CHARTER, and the GLOBAL
WARMING THEORY are all part of the Gaians mission to
save "MOTHER EARTH"
from her human infestation. Gaians have succeeded in uniting the ENVIRONMENTAL
MOVEMENT, the NEW AGE MOVEMENT, EASTERN RELIGIONS,
the UNITED NATIONS and EVEN THE LEADERS OF MANY “CHRISTIAN” DENOMINATIONS are behind this vile new form of
paganism. "The earth is not dead matter. She is alive.
Now begin to speak to the earth as you walk. your exhalation. Feel your heart touching upon the
heart of the planet. Say to her whatever words come to you: Mother Earth, I love
you. Mother Earth, I bless you. May you be
healed. May all your creatures be happy. Peace to you, Mother Earth. On behalf of
the human race, I ask forgiveness for having injured you. Forgive us, Mother Earth!
“
* * REMEMBER: "When
you worship the SUN, MOON, STARS, a STATUE, or EVEN YOURSELF, LUCIFER IS LEADING YOU ASTRAY. You are
not to worship THINGS that were created; instead you are to worship the CREATOR. To worship anything other than
the CREATOR is giving
heed to LUCIFER." -
FRITZ SPRINGMEIER ('Be Wise As
Serpents') The PATRIOT ACT One of the most striking features
of the USA
PATRIOT ACT
is the LACK
OF DEBATE
surrounding its introduction. Many of the provisions of the Act relating to ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE were
proposed before September 11th, and were subject to much criticism and
debate. JOHN PODESTA, WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF from
1998 - 2001, has questioned what has changed since then. “The events of SEPTEMBER 11 convinced...overwhelming majorities
in Congress that LAW ENFORCEMENT and NATIONAL SECURITY officials need new legal tools to
fight terrorism. But we should not forget what gave rise to the original
opposition - many aspects of the bill increase the opportunity for LAW ENFORCEMENT
AND THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY
TO RETURN
TO AN ERA WHERE THEY MONITORED AND SOMETIMES HARASSED INDIVIDUALS who were merely exercising their FIRST AMENDMENT rights. Nothing that occurred on SEPTEMBER 11 mandates that we return to such an
era.” – JOHN PODESTA (USA Patriot Act - The Good, the Bad, and the Sunset) (Winter, 2002) * When the legislative proposals
were introduced by the BUSH
ADMINISTRATION
in the aftermath of SEPTEMBER 11th, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT gave Congress ONE WEEK in which to pass the bill – WITHOUT CHANGES. Vermont Democrat PATRICK LEAHY,
CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, managed to convince the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT to agree to some changes, and
members of the House began to make significant improvements. However, the
Attorney General warned that FURTHER
TERRORIST ACTS WERE IMMINENT,
and that Congress could be to blame for such attacks, if it failed to pass
the bill immediately. Extensive and hurried negotiation
in the Senate resulted in a bipartisan bill, stripped of many of the
concessions won by SENATOR LEAHY. SENATOR THOMAS
DASCHLE,
the MAJORITY LEADER, sought unanimous consent to pass
the proposal without debate or amendment; SENATOR RUSS FEINGOLD was the only member to object. Minor changes were made in the
House, which passed the bill 357 to 66. The Senate and House versions were
quickly reconciled, and the Act was signed into law. A letter from the President of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to Members of Congress considering Patriot Act renewal states that the ABA is
"concerned that there is inadequate Congressional oversight of
government investigations undertaken pursuant to the FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT to ensure that such investigations
do not violate the FIRST,
FOURTH,
and FIFTH AMENDMENTS to the CONSTITUTION." - See ABA Resolution
on FISA and EPIC's FISA page for more information. (11/10/05) * Congress announced it would hold hearings
on SUNSETTING PATRIOT ACT POWERS. The hearings ended in June, and
Congress is expected to vote on a finalized PATRIOT RENEWAL BILL within days. According to JUDGE GLADYS KESSLER, "the
record shows that [the FBI's] efforts have been unnecessarily
slow and inefficient." COURT
ORDERS FBI TO RELEASE PATRIOT ACT INFORMATION. A federal judge has ordered the FBI to publicly release or
account for thousands of pages of information about the government's use of PATRIOT ACT powers. EPIC filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the documents nearly
eight months ago. - See the EPIC PATRIOT Act FOIA
Litigation Page. (11/17/05) On December 30, 2005, the Patriot Act provisions - due to expire - were extended
with PUBLIC LAW 109-160 that pushed the date from December
31, 2005 until February 3, 2006. The date of expiration was again changed
from February 3, 2006 until March 10, 2006 with PUBLIC LAW 109-170. - (2/3/06) Representatives Conyers, Nadler, and Scott
introduced two bills today that would amend the Patriot Act and the FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT. The PATRIOT AMENDMENTS ACT of 2009 will enhance reporting and judicial oversight of law PATRIOT ACT REVISIONS Introduced in
Senate: Today, Senator
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
and seven co-sponsors introduced the JUDICIOUS USE OF SURVEILLANCE TOOLS IN COUNTERTERRORISM
EFFORTS
(JUSTICE) ACT.
The bill would amend the Patriot
Act, the FISA Amendments Act, and other surveillance and
intelligence laws. Among other changes, the JUSTICE ACT
would reform the NATIONAL
SECURITY LETTER
process, revise the guidelines for business records orders, eliminate the
catch-all provision for "sneak-and-peek" searches, and add new
safeguards for FISA roving wiretaps. The JUSTICE ACT would also repeal retroactive
immunity for telecommunications companies, and is supported by many civil
liberties organizations. For more information, - See EPIC USA PATRIOT Act, EPIC FISA, EPIC Wiretapping, and EPIC National Security Letters. (9/17/09) The FISA AMENDMENTS ACT of 2009 will place new limits on the government's ability to collect
and store Americans' communications without a warrant and repeals retroactive
immunity. - For more information, see EPIC
FISA, EPIC PATRIOT Act. (10/20/09) PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT A "hate crimes" bill opponents claim will be used to
crack down on CHRISTIAN speech, even
the reading of the BIBLE, is poised to be signed by PRESIDENT OBAMA, a longtime proponent of the plan to
give homosexuals, and others with alternative
lifestyles, SPECIAL PROTECTIONS NOT PROVIDED OTHER CLASSES OF CITIZENS.
The Senate approved the measure 68-29 today after Democrats strategically
attached it to a "MUST-PASS" $680 BILLION DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS PLAN. Most REPUBLICANS, although normally strong supporters of the
U.S. MILITARY, opposed the bill. "The
INCLUSION OF THE CONTROVERSIAL LANGUAGE OF THE HATE CRIMES LEGISLATION, which is unrelated
to our NATIONAL
DEFENSE,
is deeply troubling," SENATOR JEFF SESSIONS
(R-AL) told FOX
NEWS after the vote. The plan also hands out federal money to states and local governments
in pursuit of "PREVENTING"
hate crimes. SENATOR
JIM DE MINT,
(R-SC), said the move is a step toward CRIMINALIZING thought and suggested the bill will be a
threat to those to speak out about their religious faith…The bill - which
CREATES FEDERAL PROTECTIONS AND PRIVILEGES FOR HOMOSEXUALS and other alternative lifestyles,
but DENIES those protections to other
groups of citizens - earlier was approved in the U.S. House. When the
Senate earlier approved a key move, MATHEW STAVER,
founder of LIBERTY
COUNSEL
said, "In…months President
OBAMA
and the Democratic-led Congress have forced on the American people the most
radical and immoral agenda. "THE ADMINISTRATION
AND THE
DEMOCRATIC-LED CONGRESS
are out of touch with the mainstream. They represent the MOST FRINGE EXTREME ELEMENTS of America. They will not be able to
continue their efforts to undermine moral values, socialize the economy and
trash American pride and heritage. The PEOPLE WILL NOT REMAIN SILENT FOREVER," he said. "In its
never-ending quest to shred
America's JUDEO-CHRISTIAN value system, the LEFTl
is planning to hurriedly push through a 'thought crimes' bill," an AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION alert said. "So-called 'hate
crimes' laws are really laws that CRIMINALIZE THOUGHT,
because they punish an individual not for what he did, but for what he THOUGHT.
Politically incorrect thoughts
about homosexual behavior will result in enhanced criminal sanctions under
this law." The AFA
said, "Everywhere hate crimes laws have gone into effect, they have been quickly used to intimidate, silence
and punish PEOPLE OF FAITH, who express deeply-held religious
objections to the normalization of homosexuality. Such laws not only punish
officially disapproved speech and thought, they create TWO TIERS of victims. Under hate crimes laws,
some victims get more protections than others, which violates the fundamental
American principle of EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW," the alert said. "In fact, such laws actively DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HETROSEXUAL CHRISTIANS who
are victims of crime, since they will get less
legal protection than HOMOSEXUAL victims." The AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION said since "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" nowhere is defined in the law,
"this law will give Pedophiles,
Voyeurs, and Exhibitionists special protections, which is why
the bill has correctly been called 'THE PEDOPHILE PROTECTION
ACT.'" * The
so-called ‘HATE CRIME’
legislation begins to lay the legal foundation and framework to
investigate, prosecute and persecute pastors,
business owners, and anyone else
whose actions are based upon and reflect the truths found in the Bible. The MAIN PURPOSE of this
legislation is to ADD the categories of “SEXUAL ORIENTATION” and “GENDER IDENTITY,”
“either actual or PERCEIVED,” as new classes of individuals receiving special
protection by federal law. SEXUAL ORIENTATION includes HETROSEXUALITY, HOMOSEXUALITY,
and BISEXUALITY on an ever-expanding continuum. GENDER IDENTITY
includes such gender-confused behaviors
as CROSS-DRESSING,, SHE-MALE,
DRAG QUEEN, TRANSVESTITE,
TRANSSEXUAL or TRANSGENDER.
Under the Act, neither “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” are really
defined. HOW can a law be
enforced, if the new classes receiving special protection remain undefined? THE SEXUAL BEHAVIORS CONSIDERED SINFUL and IMMORAL BY
MOST MAJOR RELIGIONS will be elevated to a PROTECTED “minority” Class under Federal Law
behaviors. – TRADITIONAL VALUES
COALITION (S 1105 Legislative Analysis) The AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA) has published 30 such sexual
orientations that, because of
Congress’s failure to define “sexual orientation,” will arguably be protected
under this legislation. These 30 orientations are listed in the APA’s DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS (DSM-IV), which is used by
Physicians, Psychologists, Social Workers, Nurses, and Psychiatrists
throughout the U.S. It is considered the Dictionary of Mental Disorders. Those 30 sexual orientations include behaviors that are FELONIES OR MISDEMEANORS
in most states or CAN RESULT IN DEATH. Among those Sexual Orientations are: FRONTEURISM Which
involves a man approaching an unknown
woman and rubbing up against her
buttocks. This is Criminal behavior; Incest - Which is a Crime (Sex with a Daughter or Son); Necrophilia
- a Crime (Sex
with a Corpse); Pedophilia
- a Crime (Sex
with an Underage Child); Prostitution
- a Crime in most
states; Voyeuism -
Which is a Criminal offense in most states.
Zoophilia - (Beastiality) Which is a Crime in numerous states; NON-CRIMINAL SEXUAL
ORIENTATIONS include such
behaviors as: Apotemnophilia -
Sexual Arousal from the Stumps of an
Amputee; Autogeynephilia - the Perception of a Man as being a Woman; Coprophilia - Sexual Arousal from Feces;
Transvestic Fetishism - Intense Sexually-Arousing Fantasies, Sexual Urges, and
Behaviors Involving Cross-Dressing Urophilia - Sexual Arousal from Urine. Currently,
the only place in federal law where “sexual orientation” is defined is in the
1990 “HATE CRIMES STATISTICS ACT.” In that law, “SEXUAL ORIENTATION” is defined as “consensual homosexuality or heterosexuality. Over time, homosexual activists have expanded this definition to include bisexuals and transgendered individuals
(Cross-Dressers, Drag
Queens,
Transsexuals and She-Males).
The term LGBT (Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender) is the acronym currently used to describe this expanded
definition. Ultimately, a PASTOR’S SERMON, an AUTHOR’S WRITINGS, or TALK-SHOW
HOSTS/ GUESTS’
comments concerning homosexuality could be considered an incitement to violence and punished severely. Once the legal
framework is in place, it will only be a matter of time before PASTORS
and other CHRISTIAN leaders will be persecuted for quoting
from the BIBLE…The SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH will
be justified by the claim that such speech “incites” individuals to commit
violence against HOMOSEXUALS,
CROSS-DRESSERS,
etc. Any remarks about homosexuality, such as reading BIBLE passages, PREACHING on
these passages, telling a person they
can come OUT of the homosexual lifestyle, etc., may be deemed critical remarks and may be ruled to be OUTSIDE
THE BOUNDS OF FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS for PASTORS, BUSINESS
OWNERS and INDIVIDUALS… Under the GUISE of “hate crime” prevention, the so-called HATE CRIMES BILL S. 1105, will also do the following: · CRIMINALIZE
so-called “hate speech,” which is any
speech that is critical of
homosexuality or gender confused behaviors. · ELEVATE Homosexuality
and GENDER-CONFUSED BEHAVIORS such as Cross-Dressing,
Drag-Queens, Transsexualism She-Males, etc., to the status of FEDERALLY-PROTECTED minorities. These behaviors will be considered EQUAL
TO RACE and given the same protection under federal law. · Interfere
with LOCAL law enforcement and use
scarce federal resources by
elevating every ALLEGED incident of
“hate” against a Homosexual
or Cross-Dresser into a federal
crime. · Fund
UNBALANCED, BIGOTED AND OFFENSIVE ANTI-CHRISTIAN CURRICULUM AND
MATERIALS for CHILDREN K-12,
COLLEGES, and COMMUNITY GROUPS, etc. – TRADITIONAL VALUES
COALITION S. 1105 falsely claims in The Findings, without any evidence, that “the incidence of violence motivated
by the actual or perceived race, color, national origin, religion, sexual
orientation, gender, or disability of the victim poses a serious national
problem.” FBI
STATISTICS
from 2005 (the latest available) reveal that THERE IS NO NATIONAL EPIDEMIC OR HATE AGAINST MINORITY
GROUPS OR AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS: According to the FBI, in 2005 there were
ONLY 5,190 HATE CRIMES directed against ALL persons. Of this figure,
only 1,171 were SEXUAL ORIENTATION BIAS CRIMES. Out of this 1,171: ·
301 were
listed as “INTIMIDATION.” ·
333 were
listed as “SIMPLE ASSAULT.” ·
177 were
listed as AGGRAVATED ASSAULT! There was ONE FORCIBLE RAPE and NO MURDERS BASED ON SEXUAL
ORIENTATION in 2005. ·
1 FORCIBLE
RAPE; 30 ROBBERIES; 10 BURGLARIES; 27 LARCENY-THEFT; 2 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT; 1
ARSON; 275 DAMAGE/ VANDALISM; 3 OTHER; 5 CRIMES AGAINST SOCIETY. NATIONWIDE there
were 862,947 AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS against ALL persons. (Source: FBI Crime in the United
States 2005, Aggravated Assault) In a nation of 300 MILLION, this
is NO “EPIDEMIC” OF HATE AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS
that needs federal involvement in local law enforcement. - Source: Tables 2 and 4, FBI Hate Crime Stats (2005) * "HATE SPEECH' and 'HATE CRIME' as legal categories usher in the
concept of POLITICAL
CRIME - as un-American a proposition as there can be. America's survival depends on the
unequivocal rejection of political crime." - BALINT VAZSONYI (Who lived in
Hungary under NAZI and later COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP) P.E.T.A. (People Exterminating Thousands of
Animals!) Since
the inception of PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS [PETA] in 1980, INGRID NEWKIRK has loudly renounced the torture and
killing of a myriad of animals, including Cows, Minks, Monkeys, Elephants,
Fox, Pigs and Chickens. Hundreds of thousands of animal sympathizers,
horrified by dramatic exposés, rushed to join PETA's ranks to end the suffering. But for a
quarter of a century Newkirk was conspicuously silent on
the slaughter of hundreds of millions of Companion Animals at Municipal Pounds. PETA
was mum on the tradition of executing man's closest friends and
housemates: DOGS and CATS.
However all of that changed recently. In the wake of a growing global cry to
end pound deaths, followers and foes alike demanded PETA
take a position. Slow in coming, they finally got their response. It was
nothing short of explosive.
In 2003 we learned for the first
time that Ingrid
Newkirk
- tireless defender of animals - has another face. During the 1970's her
chosen profession was "dog catcher" and killer. She was so good at it she rose
through the ranks to become DIRECTOR OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA's high-kill
pound, where she reigned for some years. There, under her rule, untold thousands more died. The
next revelation is even more appalling: Newkirk has never stopped killing.
Not only is she non-apologetic about her murky past, she quietly continues
her murderous avocation. She turned PETA's
Norfolk, Virginia headquarters into her own personal killing field. There she
hauled in more than 17,822 Puppies, Kittens, Dogs and Cats since 1998 and executed 14,419 of
them. This does
not include WILD
ANIMALS -
in 2005 alone, PETA admits to killing 141. IN 2005 NEWKIRK KILLED 90% OF
HER DEFENSELESS CAPTIVES AND ADOPTED ONLY 6% -
a ratio far worse than almost any pound in the country. Reportedly, PETA
has been busy ROUNDING UP THOUSANDS
OF ANIMALS STATEWIDE from Vet Offices, Pounds, Rescues and Guardians; leaving
each group with the indelible impression the donated animals would be adopted; then procuring
and warehousing enough CHEMICALS to
kill thousands;
and finally, disposing of all those bodies without anyone catching on…The latter was probably the most challenging task for a
notorious organization that for decades has been vehemently protesting
the killing of animals AT ANYONE ELSE’S
HAND. Some dead bodies presumably wound up in a HUGE FREEZER, which cost PETA $ 9,370, according to
a tax return. (What
else would
VEGANS do with a walk-in freezer?) Others mysteriously popped up in COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS at Shopping
Centers.
Each known drop was on a Wednesday in the wee hours, about 30 Carcasses per load, THE BODIES ALWAYS ENCASED
IN HEAVY-DUTY, BLACK PLASTIC BAGS. These regular “deliveries” were first
noticed 18 months ago. – “INGRID NEWKIRK – PETA’S SHAME” * During all of 2008, PETA found adoptive homes for just SEVEN pets. JUST 7 ANIMALS – OUT OF 2,216 IT TOOK
IN! PETA just broke its own record! Why would an animal
rights group secretly kill animals at its headquarters? PETA’s continued silence on the
matter makes it hard to say for sure. But, from a COST-SAVING standpoint, PETA’s hypocrisy isn’t difficult to understand: Killing
adoptable cats and dogs – and storing the bodies in a
walk-in freezer until they can be cremated – requires far less money and
effort than caring for the pets until they are
adopted. PETA
has a $32
MILLION ANNUAL BUDGET.
But, instead of investing in the lives of the thousands of flesh and blood
creatures in its care, the group spends Millions on MEDIA CAMPAIGNS,
telling Americans that EATING
MEAT, DRINKING MILK, FISHING, HUNTING, WEARING LEATHER SHOES, and benefiting from MEDICAL RESEARCH PERFORMED ON LAB
RATS are all “UNETHICAL.”
The bottom line: PETA’s leaders care more about cutting
into their advertising budget, than FINDING HOMES for the nearly SIX PETS they kill, on average, EVERY SINGLE
DAY! A myriad of PETA employees reported similar incidents regarding PETA's regular practice of SETTING TRAPS
across several counties not only for STRAY CATS,
but for those that were known to be part of TNR colonies supervised by local
rescues. HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS were hauled into PETA's headquarters and
killed. Many allegedly had COLLARS and TAGS, but
OWNERS WERE NEVER CALLED BEFORE THE ANIMALS WERE KILLED. – PETA KILLS ANIMALS
(1/16/10) * I often receive phone calls
from frantic people who have surrendered their pets to PETA with the understanding that PETA
will "find them a good home."
Many of them are led to believe that the animals will be taken to a nearby
shelter. Little do they know that THE PETS ARE KILLED IN THE PETA VAN before they even pull
away from the pet owner's home…PETA
REFUSES TO SURRENDER ANIMALS THEY OBTAIN TO AREA SHELTERS FOR REHOMING. If only the celebrity
"deep-pocket" donors on the west coast knew that THEIR DONATIONS
WERE GOING TO KILL ADOPTABLE CATS AND DOGS here
in Norfolk. – DANA CHEEK (Director of the
Norfolk SPCA) * They came to the office last
Wednesday and picked up the cat and two kittens," he told
ROANOKE-CHOWEN reporters immediately after the arrests. "They were just
kittens we were trying to find homes for. PETA said they would do that...So
imagine my surprise when I learned they allegedly dumped dead animals in a
trash bin later that same day." He said the animals “were in good health and were very adoptable, especially the
KITTENS.”
Proctor was asked to examine one of the dead animals taken from the PETA
crime scene. “The animal that I found was A VERY HEALTHY SIX-MONTH
PUPPY THAT HAD BEEN KILLED THAT DAY,” he told TV station WNCT Channel 9. "It was a six month old LAB MIX and appeared to be in very, very
good shape...and HE HAD RECEIVED SOME TYPE OF INJECTION IN
HIS FRONT RIGHT LEG,"
he said. “PETA
WILL NEVER PICK UP ANOTHER ANIMAL FROM MY PRACTICE.” – PATRICK PROCTOR,
DVM (Ahoskie Animal Hospital) This is a good time to revisit a comment
from INGRID
NEWKIRK's
mentor because it puts today's events in perspective: "WE ARE NOT ESPECIALLY
‘INTERESTED’ IN ANIMALS. NEITHER OF US HAD EVER BEEN INORDINATELY FOND OF
DOGS, CATS, OR HORSES IN THE WAY THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE. WE
DIDN’T ‘LOVE’ ANIMALS."
– PETER SINGER (Acknowledged Founder of the
Animal Rights Movement). POPULATION CONTROL "THE COMMON ENEMY OF HUMANITY IS MAN. In searching for a new
enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that POLLUTION, the
threat of GLOBAL WARMING, WATER SHORTAGES, FAMINE and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused
by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior
that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is HUMANITY itself." - Club of Rome, (Premier
Environmental Think-Tank; Consultants to the United Nations) * "A ONE WORLD
GOVERNMENT and ONE-UNIT MONETARY SYSTEM, under a
permanent NON-ELECTED, HEREDITARY OLIGARCHY, who SELF-SELECT
from among their numbers in the form of a FEUDAL SYSTEM as it was
in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by RESTRICTIONS
ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN per family, DISEASES, WARS, FAMINES, until [a mere] 1 BILLION people (*Out of our current population of 6 AND A HALF BILLION – in other
words 5 AND A HALF BILLION OF US MUST DIE!), who are useful to the ruling
class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the
total world population. There will be no middle class, only rulers
and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of WORLD
COURTS practicing the same UNIFIED CODE OF LAWS, backed
up by a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT POLICE FORCE and a ONE
WORLD UNIFIED MILITARY to enforce laws in all former countries, where NO
NATIONAL BOUNDARIES SHALL EXIST. The system will be on the basis of a WELFARE
STATE; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government
will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple
be STARVED TO DEATH or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who
wishes to KILL them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be
prohibited." – DR.
JOHN COLEMAN (‘Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300’) (1992) * THE SHEER MAGNITUDE AND COMPLEX WEB OF of DECEIT SURROUNDING
THE INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THIS CONSPIRACY is mind boggling, even for the most
astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and skepticism towards the
topic, unaware that they have been conditioned
(brainwashed) to react with skepticism by institutional and media
influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations:
The TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE OF
HUMAN RELATIONS
in London. Author and de-programmer FRITZ SPRINGMEIER (The Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines) says that most
people have built in "slides" that short circuit the mind's
critical examination process, when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "SLIDES," Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for A CONDITIONED
TYPE OF RESPONSE WHICH DEAD ENDS A PERSON’S THINKING AND TERMINATES DEBATE OR
EXAMINATION OF THE TOPIC AT HAND. For example, the mention of the word
"CONSPIRACY" often solicits a slide response with many people. (Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how the ILLUMINATI employs highly tuned and extrememly
sophisticated MIND CONTROL (MC) training programs that BEGIN THE PROGRAMMING PROCESS WHILE THE INTENDED VICTIM IS STILL WITHIN
THE WOMB (!)
Mind Control is a much greater problem than most people realize. According to
CISCO WHEELER, a former Illuminati mind control
programmer, there are 10 MILLION
PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED AS MIND-CONTROLLED SLAVES, using trauma-based MC programs with names
like MONARCH
and MK ULTRA. The newer, non-trauma, electronic
means of MC programming that grew out of the MONTAUK
PROJECT,
may include millions more. AL
BIELEK,
who played a principle role in the development of the MONTAUK PROJECT, said
that there likely 10 million victims of Montauk-style mind control
programming worldwide, THE MAJORITY LOCATED IN THE USA. He also said that THERE ARE COVERT MONTAUK PROGRAMMINING ‘CENTERS’ IN EVERY MAJOR CITY IN THE U.S.) – KEN ADACHI (“The New World Order (NWO): An Overview” –
educate-yourself.com) (11/30/09) * In 1961, the KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION ordered a "TOP SECRET"
study to determine what problems
(?!) the United States would face if the world moved from an era of war to a
golden age of peace. In other words, how to bring America into the NEW WORLD ORDER. By 1963 the selection of the
specialist had been made. This study group consisted of 15 experts in various
academic disciplines who were selected for their expertise in their various
fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear survival
retreat called IRON MOUNTAIN. In the same year that this "Top
Secret" study was called, 1961, The DEPARTMENT OF STATE put out a
publication (#7277) called "FREEDOM FROM WAR, THE
UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR A GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A
PEACEFUL WORLD." This publication describes a three step program to disarm the American military, shut down
bases and have ONE MILITARY UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS. This "military" would be the WORLD
WIDE POLICE FORCE
to be used as "PEACE
KEEPERS"
throughout the world. The plan would include that "all weapons of mass destruction" be eliminated with the exception of "those required for a UNITED
NATIONS (!) PEACE (!) FORCE" (page 12 paragraph one). In order to
"keep the peace, all states will reaffirm their obligations under the UN
Charter to refrain from the threat of use of any type armed force" (page
16, Paragraph eight) To support the UN Charter, THE AVERAGE CITIZEN WILL NEED
TO BE DISARMED; SO THEY CANNOT DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST THESE “PEACE
KEEPERS." You don't have to watch much news to see that today, the UN
forces are used as "peace keepers" throughout the world, DISARMING
people, so THEY CAN’T DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENTS. To
quote SARAH
BRADY,
Chair of Handguncontrol, Inc. "Our Task of CREATING
A SOCIALIST AMERICA
can only succeed, WHEN THOSE WHO WOULD RESIST
US HAVE BEEN TOTALLY DISARMED." – PAULA DEMERS (“Iron Mountain: A Hoax Or Betrayal?” - Wisdom And Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND) (c1999) * Forced abortions. Mass sterilization.
A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American
citizens. The tyrannical fantasies of a madman?
Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the
United States? Or both? These ideas (among many other
equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren whom
Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and
Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science
and Technology - informally known as the United States' Science Czar In a
book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science
policy in this country wrote that: v Women could be forced to abort their
pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not; v The population at large could be
sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking
water or in food; v Single mothers and teen mothers should
have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise; v People who "contribute to social
deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to
exercise reproductive responsibility" - in other words, be compelled to
have abortions or be sterilized. v A transnational "Planetary
Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the
most intimate details of Americans' lives - using an armed international
police force. POWER & POLITICS The NATIONAL PARTIES and their PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATES, with the Eastern Establishment assiduously
fostering the process behind the scenes, moved closer together
and nearly MET IN THE CENTER with almost IDENTICAL CANDIDATES AND PLATFORMS,
although the process was concealed as much as possible, by the revival of
obsolescent or meaningless war cries and slogans (often going back to the
CIVIL WAR…The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals
and policies, one, perhaps, of the RIGHT and the other of the LEFT, is a
foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers.)
Instead, the two parties should be
almost identical, so that the American people can “THROW THE RASCALS OUT ” at any election, without leading to any profound or extreme shifts
in policy…Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired,
unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace
it, every four years if necessary, by the other
party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies. – CARROLL QUIGLEY
(Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time – New York: Macmillan
pp. 1247-1248) (1966) * "GOVERNMENT: If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your
property will be confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property,
you will be arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed.
If you defend yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These
procedures are known as the RULE OF LAW." - EDWARD ABBEY * "...the argument for liberty
is not an argument against organization, which is one of the most powerful
tools human reason can employ, but an argument against all exclusive, privileged, monopolistic
organization, against the use of coercion to prevent others from doing better." - F.A. HAYEK * "...Although the political
liberty of this country is greater than that of nearly every other civilized
nation, its personal liberty
is said to be less. In other words, men are thought to be more under the
control of extra-legal authorities, and to defer more to those around them,
in pursuing even their lawful and innocent occupations, than in almost every
other country." - JAMES FENIMORE COOPER (*Particularly in the case of "Executive Orders," "laws" made by the Supreme
Court, and all so-called "politically
correct" mandates made by agencies and other "NGOs" - all of which are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! – OL) * 1. "POWER is
not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." 2. "Never go outside the
expertise of your people. When an
action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is
confusion, fear and retreat..[and] the collapse of communication. 3. "Whenever possible, go outside
the expertise of the ENEMY.
Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens
all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by
seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.) 4. "Make the enemy LIVE
UP TO ITS OWN BOOK OF RULES. You can kill
them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian
church can live up to Christianity." 5. "RIDICULE is
man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule.
Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage." 6. "A good tactic is
one your people ENJOY." 7. "A tactic that drags on too long
becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in
any issue for only a limited time...." 8. "KEEP THE PRESSURE ON,
with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for
your purpose." 9. "The THREAT is
usually more terrifying than the thing itself." 10. "The major premise for tactics is
the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon
the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the
reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the
campaign." 11. "If you push a negative hard and
deep enough, it will break through into its counterside...EVERY
POSITIVE HAS ITS NEGATIVE." 12. "The price of a successful
attack is a constructive ALTERNATIVE." 13. Pick the Target, FREEZE
IT, PERSONALIZE IT, and POLARIZE IT.
In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as
universalities. One is that the OPPOSITION must be singled out as the target
and 'frozen.'... – SAUL ALINSKY (‘Rules For
Radicals,’pps.127-134) * A good example of Political Hate Speech follows: “At the time of the winter solstice, let reason prevail. There are NO
GODS, NO DEVILS, NO ANGELS, NO HEAVEN OR HELL. There is only our natural world. RELIGION IS JUST A MYTH & SUPERSTITION THAT HARDENS HEARTS
AND ENSLAVES MINDS.” A political
candidate in the primary election for the office of Comptroller in Illinois
has filed a lawsuit against the state, charging it officially expressed
"HATE" AND "HOSTILITY" TOWARD CHRISTIANITY
and other religions that include a belief in GOD, by allowing ATHEISTS to post a sign in a state building at
Christmas. It was placed in the Illinois
Capitol Building, through which GOP comptroller candidate WILLIAM J. KELLY, a cable television executive, was
required to travel for his responsibilities as a candidate. "The FIRST
AMENDMENT of the United States Constitution, in conjunction with the 14th AMENDMENT, forbids state action that has the
effect of disapproving, inhibiting or evincing hostility toward religion,"
the lawsuit, filed in the Northern District in Illinois, said, "The
United States Supreme Court has specifically held, for instance, that the
Constitution affirmatively mandates ACCOMMODATION
not merely TOLERANCE, OF ALL RELIGIONS, and FORBIDS HOSTILITY toward any
…" Kelly named
ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE JESSE WHITE, who is responsible for enforcing
state property regulations, as defendant. "The language in the sign at
issue stating 'Religion is just a myth and superstition
that hardens hearts and enslaves minds' is speech that evidences disapproval
and hostility toward religion," the case continues. "Further,
that speech is attributable to the defendant by virtue of the defendant
approving the sign, despite the ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE expressly prohibiting the sign, and by its placement
of the sign next to the described displays in the Capitol Building." "We need to stop the hate
speech against Christians
and all religious people," Kelly said in a statement released along with the announcement
about the lawsuit. "It
is this attitude of hate that has enabled the stripping of religion,
tradition, and history from our holidays, our history books, and our culture
in general. PERHAPS ATHEISTS
NEED SOME SENSITIVITY TRAINING." The case
seeks declaratory relief and permanent injunction. "I wouldn't be
allowed to go around and make hateful statements about other religions,"
Kelly told WND."The totality of the language of the sign is hostile and
inflammatory to ALL RELIGIONS, including but not limited to Christianity,
Catholicism, Judaism, Islam and others that worship God and/or
believe in the concepts heaven and hell," the case claims. According
to a CBS report, it was Kelly who at
Christmas was escorted from the Capitol Building for turning the sign around so that it could not be read. He was
escorted away by Capitol police and was the subject of an incident report.
Kelly said then the sign was "hate speech," and the lawsuit
documents that allegation. "Kelly
turned the sign, so that the sign was face down. Kelly did so, in part, on
the basis that the sign constituted hate speech, and because the defendant's
approval and placement of the sign in
violation of the Constitution and its own governing law violated the
Establishment Clause's prohibition against government disapproval of
religion," the lawsuit explains. But the sign is part of a routine
campaign run by the FREEDOM
FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION,
which puts them near nativity displays across the country at Christmas. Foundation
spokesman DAN
BARKER
told CBS at the time that Kelly was escorted
away from the Illinois Capitol that he, in fact, was right: "He's
kind of right, because the last couple of sentences do criticize religion,
and of course, the beginning is a celebration of the winter solstice. But
that kind of speech is protected as well – speech that is critical and speech
that is supportive,"
he said. * Illustrating the “do
as I say, not as I do” attitude of today’s “tolerance”-loving liberals, one wag came up with this: “Hm; in
order to "let reason prevail," let us consider how such a sign
might look when pushing a different message; consider this hypothetical
placard, which could have been erected directly in front of the MENORAH
in the rotunda: At the time of the MASS OF CHRIST, let the SON OF GOD
prevail. THERE ARE NO LAWS, NO ACTS THAT CAN SAVE
YOU FROM HELL.
There is only the divine salvation that comes from the KING OF KINGS. JUDAISM IS JUST A MYTH AND SUPERSTITION THAT
BEWITCHES BELIEVERS AND DAMNS SOULS. Does anybody believe that such a (purely hypothetical) sign would be allowed under the Illinois state Capitol
dome? Obviously not, because it is not so much an expression of faith as AN ATTACK ON OTHER PEOPLE’S FAITH.” The
commentary continued: "FFRF plants their pugnacious sign like Cortez
planting the flag of Spain in Aztec Mexico: Wherever it stands, it's a deliberate and truculent affront to
religions other than atheism…as even the foundation's co-president
agrees!" Officials said the case has been assigned to JUDGE REBECCA
PALLMEYER. Kelly is among six candidates in Tuesday's primary. He is facing
Orland Park Village Trustee JIM
DODGE
and former State Treasurer JUDY
BAAR TOPINKA
for the GOP nomination. Democratic candidates are state REP. DAVID E. MILLER, former State Deputy Treasurer RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI and
lawyer CLINT
KRISLOV.
WND reported when the
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION suggested people complain to the post office about a stamp
honoring MOTHER TERESA. The FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION also challenged the PRAYERS AT PRESIDENT OBAMA’S INAUGURATION. – BOB UNRUH (“Faith Under Fire: Atheist Hate Sign Blasted in Lawsuit” –
World Net Daily) (2010) PRESCRIPTION DRUGS The following
interview is unusually long for this column, but it is so important, that I
didn’t want to shortchange any of this vital information – especially since
we have so little time left before this will be yanked: DR. STRAND: “I have
been in the practice for 31 years of my medical career and I think all physicians
appreciate the inherent risks all drugs present to their patient. We are
always weighing the risk of medication, or the risk of adverse drug
reactions, to the health benefits they can obtain. So what really got my
attention was an article written in THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN MEDICAL
ASSOCIATION back in 1998, in which they showed that PROPERLY PRESCRIBED MEDICATION, PRESCRIBED
AND TAKEN PROPERLY, is the FOURTH
LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH in the country. Then, when
you add the improperly prescribed medications to this that are not taken
properly, that is another 80,000 DEATHS making it the THIRD-LEADING CAUSE OF
DEATH. Yet, no one in this country is talking about it. WE
DON’T EVEN KEEP STATISTICS ON IT. Yet, all other researchers present the fact
that OVER HALF OF THESE DEATHS COULD
BE AVOIDED if people just knew what to do. So I
think that was the purpose and reason for writing the book. It's just to WARN
PEOPLE THAT THEY DON’T NEED TO TAKE SO MUCH MEDICATION. If you really need to
take medication, take it. But I have always had the philosophy: YOU
SHOULD TAKE MEDICATION AS A LAST RESORT, NOT A FIRST
CHOICE. DO NOT HAVE
BLIND FAITH IN THE FDA, THE PHARMACEUTICAL
INDUSTRY, THE DOCTOR OR THE PHARMACIST. You need to take some personal
responsibility to protect yourself and your loved ones from an adverse drug
reaction. “There is a chain of events that
occurs. You will find that you have to rely on the pharmaceutical industry to
perform the studies. They are the one that are required to perform them. The
FDA reviews those studies, looking for obvious health benefits or an
effective medication and balances it against the risk the medication
presents. Then you have to have a doctor who understands all of that and
prescribes it properly. You have to have a pharmacist who is going to fill
that prescription, and then the patient takes it and must take it properly.
So this chain of events is always occurring. THE PROBLEM THAT MOST PEOPLE HAVE
IS THAT THEY JUST TRUST THE
PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, THE FDA, THE DOCTOR AND THE PHARMACIST, and
they just have that blind faith, which I try to point out in the book. As I
go through the first part of the book, you can’t read without starting to
realize what the truth is. The truth is that, yes, they are doing their best
job, but there is still an inherent risk for taking medication, and we have
to be aware of that.” – DR. RAY
STRAND, M.D. (Author of ‘Death By Prescription’) MIKE: “So I
would encourage readers to just check out the first 20 pages of DEATH
BY PRESCRIPTION. I don't think they will ever look at their medicine
cabinets the same way again.” – MIKE ADAMS
(The Health Ranger - “Live With Dr. Ray Strand” – Interview – Truth
Publishing, International, Ltd.) (2005) DR. STRAND: “That’s
true, you know. I always use one thing that really points out the fact, which
is that, ONCE THE FDA
APPROVES THE MEDICATION OR A DRUG for
use by the general public, THEY KNOW LESS
THAN HALF OF THE SERIOUS ADVERSE
DRUG REACTIONS, when
that drug is released. It is just impossible to know them all. Well, they
find out, and the next question should be, "How do they find out the
others?" Well, it's owing to you, the public, or what I call in my book,
“the great clinical trial.” It is YOU who
finds out. “But it is a voluntary reporting
system. Less than one percent of these
adverse drug reactions are really reported back to the FDA, because
DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
REPORT THEM back. It is voluntary. Then, it is reported to a committee in the
FDA that has no authority. Once enough of these red flags come in on a drug,
then they'll send it back to the original committee that approved the drug in
the first place. I do not feel that they have an unbiased representation when
they look at this. That’s why OVER 99
PERCENT OF THE TIME ALL THAT HAPPENS IS A CHANGE TO THE DRUG LABEL, OR WHAT
WE CALL A PACKAGE INSERT. This usually goes unnoticed even if they send out a "DEAR
DOCTOR" LETTER WARNING DOCTORS about these drugs, and that they better
be careful here. There have been studies that show DOCTORS
DON’T PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO THAT. So it’s not a very good system. MIKE:
Yes, and just to clarify - because I think the force of what
you just said is easy to miss if people aren’t paying attention - there is
really no process in place, NO mandatory
process, to report dangerous, even fatal, side effects from these
prescription drugs. Is that what you are saying? DR.
STRAND: That’s what I am saying. I list a
lot of the drugs in my book that have been taken off of the market. One of
them, the first non-sedating, called
SELDANE, did not come off of the market for 12 YEARS, even though they
started to realize that – WHEN YOU COMBINE DRUGS LIKE ERYTHROMYCIN
WITH SELDANE - which will be a COMMON COMBINATION because of allergies,
colds and sore
throat - they
had an unusual side effect called SUDDEN
DEATH. It took
12 years to find this out and actually get it off of the market. So it’s
a very poor system, and we are seeing drugs being pulled. BAYCOL was
another one pulled from the market because of multiple damages, kidney failure and death. It was
taken off about two years ago. So you start to look at the process, and it’s
really not a very good one. MIKE: The timing of all this is quite interesting, because,
SINCE THE TIME YOUR BOOK WAS PUBLISHED, THE MARKETING AND PROPAGANDA ABOUT
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS HAS SKYROCKETED. DR. STRAND: It was even before that. As a physician, I always was
amazed when the pharmaceutical industry
started ADVERTISING their products to the general public. My gut reaction
was, "Why are they doing
that?" Because people need a PRESCRIPTION to get the medication they are advertising. MIKE: Yes. DR. STRAND: When I did the research for the book, it was really
interesting to find out that various studies show that BETWEEN 70 TO 90
PERCENT OF THE
TIME WHEN A PATIENT COMES IN TO THE DOCTOR AND ASKS FOR A SPECIFIC DRUG THAT
HE SAW ON A COMMERCIAL OR IN AN ADVERTISEMENT, HE WALKS OUT WITH A PRESCRIPTION FOR THAT VERY DRUG. So the
drug companies know that it is effective, and it doesn’t really shine a great
light on physicians and their prescribing habits…I mean that's what it is all
about. They will actually make an appointment specifically for an advertised
drug. Whether it's the PURPLE PILL, an allergy medication, VIAGRA - or all of
the impotency medications that are out there - people come in and
specifically ask for them. You see it all the time. It happens every day in
our practices…What you are finding is that PHYSICIANS HAVE PRETTY MUCH BEEN
PHARMACEUTICALLY TRAINED and were disease-oriented. So PHYSICIANS FIND THEIR COMFORT
IN WRITING PRESCRIPTIONS. They understand their drugs, at least most of them
do, and that’s what they are trained to do. We are looking for disease and
the treatments that we know we can prescribe. But what has happened is that the
art of medicine has kind of gone by the wayside, because we do not spend time
with patients. We don’t TEACH THEM how
they can best AVOID high blood pressure medication, or
cholesterol-lowering drugs, or diabetes medication, because number one;
we don’t have time, and number two; we don’t believe the changes they can
make will be effective. We want to rely on our medication, despite the fact
that every time I go to a medical meeting, they are always talking about a FIRST-STEP
THERAPY. If someone comes in with high blood pressure, or
elevated cholesterol, or they are starting to become diabetic, you should at least give these people a chance on
healthy lifestyle changes, so that they don’t have to take the medication -
that’s called first step therapy. But I am sorry to say that
I think most physicians just give this recommendation lip service,
while, in actuality, they WRITE THE PRESCRIPTION. That’s what is happening.
It is partly demand by the people and the patients, but it is also due
to our TRAINING, and BEING INUNDATED BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL REPS WHO COME INTO
OUR OFFICE PROMOTING THEIR PRODUCTS. MIKE: I have heard a statistic that says the pharmaceutical companies spend an average of $10,000 PER
YEAR, PER PHYSICIAN, just marketing to the physicians in the United States. DR. STRAND: Well
that wouldn't surprise me, because if I could line up pharmaceutical reps or
the detail people who come in my office, I could see as many as TEN OF THEM, AS
COMPARED TO ONE OF MY PATIENTS. You have to limit
them(!),* but they're there, selling their wares. They know
it’s effective because they wouldn’t spend the money if it didn’t work. FREE SAMPLES are
another thing that they spend a lot of money on - much more than people realize.
So it’s a concern. We are seeing this more and more, and there are problems
that are coming up. I just feel that WE HAVE AN OVER-MEDICATED SOCIETY
BECAUSE OF ALL THE PRESSURE TO USE MEDICATIONS. (*Mercy! No
wonder PATIENTS have to WAIT SO LONG to be able to see their doctors!
And just think how many MORE doctors there are today, from when we
were kids! Can you imagine what it would be like if these sales reps WEREN’T
“limited?!!” – OL) MIKE: With this over-medication, do you think that there is
any looming backlash or some kind of crisis that is going to occur? DR. STRAND: Well, yes. We are already seeing it with the ANTIBIOTIC use and abuse that has been
going on. For years, since the advent of SULFA and PENICILLIN, we
have been able to come up with newer compounds and molecules to fight off
infectious disease. But we are running out of these new products as we are
starting to see more and more resistance to these antibiotics. It’s a
major concern for hospitals and doctors, and there was a tremendous effort
placed in the 1990s through the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, and
various health organizations, to make people aware of the overuse of antibiotics on viral colds.
Through that ten-year period they were really excited to see that antibiotic
use had dropped by one-third. But what was really interesting was that the
office visits for those same problems dropped by one-third. So what really
happened was that THE PEOPLE, THE PARENTS, BECAME MORE AWARE OF WHAT WAS
A VIRUS AND WAS NOT. THE
ANTIBIOTICS DON’T HELP VIRUSES, so they didn’t just take their
kids into the hospital or the office. But when they finally did go into
the office, the percentage of
antibiotics prescribed by doctors never changed. So it really was owing
to people becoming more aware, and that was an encouragement to me in writing
the book, because WE NEED TO START EDUCATING THE PATIENT ABOUT THE USE OF
MEDICATION start. They could become more proactive with their own health,
and if they do take medication, they could take it more wisely and avoid
these adverse drug reactions. I have an email newsletter that
comes out monthly, and it's about various subjects. People can go to
releasingfat.com and sign up for my FREE
NEWSLETTER newsletter. It's there, and it's available. I have raystrand.com, where
they can see my nutritional recommendations, and that is more of a membership
webpage. Plus, it has some basic information. MIKE: I just want to point out how remarkable it is that you have been classically trained as an MD
through medical school and with all the experience of clinical practice, but YOU ARE ABLE TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN MIND AND REALLY SEE
THE BIG PICTURE HERE. That is not so common today. How does that happen,
and what sets you apart? DR. STRAND: Well, what happened was that my wife had suffered from
a disease called FIBROMYALGIA CHRONIC FATIGUE, and we
had lived with this for twenty-plus years. In the 80s and 90s, she just
started to go downhill. Every year, she got worse and suffered more pain and
more fatigue. In 1995, she came down with serious PNEUMONIA, and we were able to get through that, but she was left
with serious CHRONIC FATIGUE; she really couldn’t get out of
bed for more than one to two hours a day. This went on month after month
after month, and in spite of seeing four different specialists and being
placed on NINE DIFFERENT MEDICATIONS, she really did not improve. I
didn’t get much hope from the doctors. Well, at that time, someone gave
my wife some NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS - which I strongly did not believe in at that time. I was a
typical doctor, and I thought that it would just create expensive urine or be
a waste of money. But I told my wife, "Honey,
you could try anything," because we were just not helping. When that
happens to your family, it really hits home, being a physician. I have to
admit that, within weeks, she got better. Within
months, she was OFF OF ALL HER MEDICATIONS, and within about five or six
months, SHE WAS
BETTER THAN SHE HAD BEEN IN NINE OR TEN YEARS! That got
my interest and caught my attention, and that’s when I started researching.
So I have been researching nearly ten years now on this subject, and I AM
FINDING A WEALTH OF INFORMATION THAT I
WAS NEVER TAUGHT IN MEDICAL SCHOOL. …I am not a conspiracy theory
expert, but I really believe that WHEN PEOPLE START TO UNDERSTAND
THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF SUPPLEMENTATION, PEOPLE WILL BE TAKING LESS
PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS. So there is a great debate out there because the
pharmaceutical industry would like to get all of the vitamins off the show.
It is an economic decision. THEY’D RATHER SEE PEOPLE TAKING DRUGS. MIKE: I am one of the people who talks about that and, like
you, I don’t think it’s a conspiracy.
I think it's just CORPORATE GREED. I mean, they want to make more money. DR. STRAND: Oh, yes! It's an economic decision. In my book, DEATH
BY PRESCRIPTION, I have a chapter called “Deadly Partnership.” A lot of people don’t realize that in 1992 Congress passed a law called the "USER-FEE" LAW, which required pharmaceutical companies to actually
pay a user fee, so that the FDA could review their drugs. This
was a quarter million dollars per new drug application. Well, that has grown
so much by now that THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IS ACTUALLY CONTRIBUTING OVER
HALF OF THE FDA’S BUDGET. So, instead of the FDA being an isolated group that
really scrutinizes all of these drugs, they have actually formed a PARTNERSHIP!. There
is pressure on the FDA now not so much on, "How should this drug be approved?" The attitude
has changed to, "How can WE
get this drug approved?" We see this, and there is a
great deal written in many studies. So it has really changed the atmosphere
of drug approval, and I think it is going to come back to haunt us, because
it is a very poor system. I think that the pharmaceutical industry, being a
very powerful, very wealthy industry, is really flexing its muscles in all of
these avenues, such as ALTERNATIVE HEALTH and INTEGRATED
MEDICINE. They are all being attacked and put down by doctors. But the
pharmaceutical industry needs to start paying attention, because there is so
much literature now that supports
the health benefits. They can't just keep ignoring it… MIKE: One
of the latest drugs to earn a lot of popularity and receive a lot of
advertising funds are the STATIN class of drugs. It
seems they are being marketed as miracle drugs to treat practically
everything. I have even heard physicians say, "I am taking them every
day for the rest of my life - whether I need it or not." DR. STRAND:
Well, I never saw this report, but I read in The New York Times that
they actually said we should be putting
it in the WATER. MIKE: Yes,
I saw that as well. DR. STRAND: Here
is a very classic thing: They just lowered the recommended level of LDL
CHOLESTEROL, or the bad cholesterol, to be below 70 in high-risk
people. Well, I have not seen less than 4 or 5 percent of my patients have
LDL cholesterol below 70. In other words, ALMOST EVERYBODY WOULD THEN BE ON STATIN DRUGS. This
is a real shot in the arm of the pharmaceutical industry, because they have
got a government agency – ABOUT NINE LEADING PEOPLE IN THIS INDUSTRY – MAKING
THESE RECOMMENDATIONS. Well, then you find out that AT LEAST
SEVEN of these nine physicians WHO WERE
MAJOR KEY PEOPLE ON THE STUDIES AND RECOMMENDING THESE CHANGES WERE RECEIVING MONEY AND, FOR SOME OF THEM,
PRETTY GOOD STIPENDS FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. MIKE: A
big surprise, right? DR. STRAND: Yeah,
a big surprise. So that is how it is being done, and they keep lowering it.
All that means is that more and more people have to be on medication. But,
you see, HEART
DISEASE IS NOT A DISEASE OF CHOLESTEROL.
OVER HALF OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE HEART ATTACKS ACTUALLY HAVE NORMAL CHOLESTEROL
LEVELS. Heart disease is an inflammatory disease of the artery. LDL
CHOLESTEROL IS NOT EVEN BAD. It only becomes bad when it becomes oxidized or modified by an excess of FREE RADICALS.
So you start to look at all the causes
of inflammation, which are caused by an excess of free radicals caused by
DIABETES, HYPERTENSION, CIGARETTE SMOKING, FATTY MEALS, HIGH-SUGAR
MEALS, HIGH-GLYCEMIC MEALS - these will cause
your arteries to go into spasm because of the inflammation four to six hours
after a meal. You start to look at homocysteine, and LDL cholesterol is a
factor that's oxidized. You put them all together, and almost all of those causes of
inflammation can either be significantly reduced or eliminated by the healthy lifestyles that I have recommended on my web pages. So
what the physicians and the medical community are going to do is to come up
with ways to reverse the inflammation after it has already begun, whereas in
preventative medicine, wellness and health, it's going to be, "How do we AVOID the
inflammation in the first place?" That’s going to be the big war
that you are going to see in the next 10 years.” MIKE: And
that’s raging right now. DR. STRAND: Oh,
yes. MIKE: I
want to come back to statin drugs, because I'm reminded of a full-page
advertisement that I saw for a brand-name statin drug, which essentially said
that healthy lifestyle changes aren’t enough. You can follow the right diet,
you can exercise, but it’s not enough. YOU NEED STATIN DRUGS. I found
that message quite shocking. DR. STRAND: They
have always been very good about saying that you should use statin drugs only
after a trial of healthy lifestyles. That’s kind of been the standard
approach, but that doesn’t surprise me at all. I feel this is where we are
going. The sad thing is that STATIN DRUGS ARE NOT THAT
SAFE. I mean, I can’t tell you how many patients I've had to take
off of those drugs because of MUSCLE
ACHING, MUSCLE WEAKNESS, OR BECAUSE THEIR LIVER ENZYMES WENT UP. What
happens is that you struggle with this, and YOU ARE
TAKING STATIN DRUGS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. The
other thing is that a lot of people do not realize the fact that STATIN DRUGS - while they do block the
production of cholesterol – ALSO BLOCK THE PRODUCTION OF A VERY
IMPORTANT NUTRIENT CALLED COENZYME Q10. There are some studies appearing
in the medical literature hinting to the fact that Once you have been on these
FOR OVER EIGHT YEARS, you significantly increasing your risk of cancer. CoQ10 is a very important
nutrient for our immune system, and it PROTECTS OUR BODIES FROM CANCER AND ILLNESSES. So
I find that this is a really sad situation, because it’s the promotion of
drugs. I strongly believe that the new recommendations are not right, that
this is not the way we should be going. Yes, LDL cholesterol and oxidized LDL
are a problem, but it is only one in about a dozen problems you have to address
when a patient who is either at high risk for heart disease or has had a
heart attack comes in. We are not paying attention to the fact that IT IS
INFLAMMATION THAT WE HAVE TO BE WORKING WITH; NOT CHOLESTEROL. MIKE: Interesting.
So once again, we're back to the grand experiment: AMERICANS ARE GUINEA PIGS.
Ten years down the line, we might see astonishingly negative side
effects from statin drug use, right? DR. STRAND:
Well, I think so, too. I think we are seeing them already. But you know what?
See, WE DON’T KEEP STATISTICS. WE DON’T SEE ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS APPEAR
ON DEATH CERTIFICATES. We just don’t do it.
It was the studies that had to actually come up with [the statistics]. I
think that’s why physicians don’t even believe the statistics that I am
telling. In my book, DEATH BY PRESCRIPTION, I
give a tremendous bibliography. It documents
everything that I say, and it's there. All they have to do is go and look
at it themselves. But we need to pride ourselves, as physicians, to become
more active in looking at third-party information. WE DON’T NEED
ALL THESE NEW DRUGS. If someone comes out with a
blood pressure medication, the next time you turn around, we've got ten on
the market. Or these new ARB BLOOD
PRESSURE MEDICATIONS - I think there's six or seven of them
out there. We've got 15 NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES, and there's not
really much advantage of one over the other. I call them "ME TOO" DRUGS; they
all just come out. So we need to go with the "TRIED AND
TRUE" ones, because once a drug's been out over five years, we know
most of the adverse drug reactions. Doctors are familiar with them, THEY COST
LESS AND THEY ARE JUST AS EFFECTIVE Occasionally, they'll come up with a new
molecule or a new compound that is a revolutionary new drug. But that doesn't
happen very often. Probably LESS THAN ONE PERCENT of the time… MIKE: I
have one last question for you, Dr. Strand. You mentioned that you're
writing a book on OBESITY AND DIABETES. Would you like to
give a few hints of what people might find in that and when it might be
available? DR. STRAND: What
we're finding is that the problem is INSULIN RESISTANCE. Here, again, the
recommendation started thirty years ago. Because the problem was fat and
cholesterol, we went to a high-carb, low-fat diet, thinking this was the
healthiest diet in the world. Not only has heart disease not come down, it's
going up. What we're finding is that THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS BY
THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY HAVE CREATED OUR OBESITY AND DIABETES EPIDEMIC. The CDC came
out last year and said that a child born after the year 2000 will run over a
30 PERCENT risk of developing diabetes at some time in their lifetime. If they
happen to be BLACK or HISPANICi, it's going to be nearly 50 PERCENT. It's all
because of PROCESSED
FOODS, HIGH-GLYCEMIC FOODS AND FAST FOODS that this is happening. People have to understand that there
are GOOD CARBOHYDRATES out there, and we need them, because they contain our
antioxidants, minerals and vitamins. We need our FRUITS
and our VEGETABLES. They aren't the bad culprits - it's the processed
carbs. NOT ALL FAT IS BAD. We're learning
that there is good fat.
Taking OMEGA-3
fats, MONO-SATURATED fats and VEGETABLE FATS IN THEIR HEALTHY STATE WILL
ACTUALLY LOWER LDL CHOLESTEROL. They lower total
cholesterol and raise your good HDL. For proteins, it's the same
thing. There is good protein out there, and there is bad protein. So my book
pretty much focuses on EATING A HEALTHY DIET
THAT DOES NOT SPIKE YOUR BLOOD SUGAR, and it talks about
exercise. It is just MODEST EXERCISE that
gets your body moving. It's also about, of course, taking what I called "CELLULAR NUTRITION" which,
as I explained earlier, is just a good, complete and balanced nutritional SUPPLEMENT
that’s high in quality. MIKE: It
seems that the implied message in all of this - if you'll allow me to paraphrase
- is that obesity and diabetes are almost universally PREVENTABLE. DR. STRAND:
Correct. A lot of people don’t understand that when you spike your blood
sugar, you over-stimulate insulin release, because the body has to control
blood sugar. INSULIN drives the blood sugar
into the cell to either be utilized or STORED AS FAT. The
blood sugar drops dramatically. In at least a majority of the population, it
drops below normal. So it gets into the low-blood-sugar range. Our bodies
have to get it back up, so in order to try to raise that blood sugar back to
normal, it stimulates the release of several hormones: CORTISOL, which is a stress hormone; ADRENALINE, the fight-or-flight
hormone; GLUCAGONS and GROWTH HORMONE. But YOU ARE
LEFT WITH AN UNCONTROLLABLE HUNGER. Many people talk about CRAVING and EMOTIONAL EATING. It's something that has happened because of
this vicious cycle, and we usually crave another high-glycemic or sugary
meal. So we keep doing this, and we
tend to eat 80 PERCENT MORE CALORIES THAN WE NORMALLY WOULD if we learned to
eat in such way that you don’t spike your blood sugar. When people just
understand this, they feel good. THEY CAN EAT; it’s not a low-calorie diet.
They just eat WHAT THEY WANT, and they learn to eat the RIGHT KINDS of food.
You start to EXERCISE, and you improve insulin sensitivity. Pretty soon YOU
START TO RELEASE FAT. Your body won’t hold onto fat, and that’s why I called
it "releasing fats." People can actually get a copy of the book at releasingfat.com,
which is available now. MIKE: For
those reading, you can also check out raystrand.com. Dr.
Strand, I want to thank you so much for sharing your time and your wisdom
with us today.” – MIKE ADAMS (The Health Ranger -
“Live With Dr. Ray Strand” – Interview – Truth Publishing, International,
Ltd.) (2005) PRIVATE PROPERTY
“THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE
PROPERTY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT GUARANTEE TO FREEDOM, not
only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because
of the control of the means of production is divided among many
people acting independently that no one has
complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what we do for
ourselves.” – FRIEDRICH A.
HAYCK * "If
we would have CIVILIZATION and the
exertion indispensable to its success, we must have property; if we have
property, we must have its rights; if we have the RIGHTS OF PROPERTY, we must
take those consequences
of the rights of property which are inseparable from the rights
themselves." - JAMES FENIMORE COOPER * "Property rights are not the rights of property; they are the rights of humans
with regard to property. They are a particular kind of HUMAN
RIGHT." - DAVID FRIEDMAN * "Both FREE
SPEECH RIGHTS and PROPERTY
RIGHTS
belong legally to individuals, but their real function is social, to
benefit VAST NUMBERS of people who
do not themselves exercise these rights." - THOMAS SOWELL * "It is
precisely THOSE THINGS WHICH BELONG TO ‘THE PEOPLE’
which have historically been despoiled - WILD CREATURES, the AIR,
and WATERWAYS being notable
examples. This goes to the heart of why property rights are socially
important in the first place. PROPERTY RIGHTS MEAN SELF-INTERESTED
MONITORS. No owned
creatures are in danger of extinction. No owned forests are in danger
of being leveled. No one kills the goose that lays the golden egg when it is HIS goose." - THOMAS SOWELL * “The ABUSE
OF EMINENT DOMAIN has become a national plague, and the INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
is fighting to end it.” THE BOSTON GLOBE For half a century, unrestrained
local and state governments have taken private property not for "public uses"-
such as for bridges or public buildings - as permitted by the Constitution, but for PRIVATE businesses in the
name of "ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT."
Private homes and businesses have been bulldozed, replaced by newer
businesses and homes owned not by the public, but by private, POLITICALLY
POWERFUL INDIVIDUALS AND CORPORATIONS. (*Collectively known as “the Elite” –
or more accurately, “the International Crime Bosses”! – OL) The INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE began its fight
against “EMINENT DOMAIN” ABUSE by successfully defending VERA COKING, an elderly widow from
Atlantic City, against the condemnation of her home by a state agency that
sought to take her property and transfer it (at a bargain-basement price) to
another private individual: DONALD TRUMP.
Trump wanted the property for a limousine parking lot for his
customers - hardly a public use. Until IJ began fighting eminent domain
abuse, the presumption was that people like Vera would lose. But thanks to
our path - breaking work in the court of law and the COURT
OF PUBLIC OPINION,
Vera won. The Institute set an important precedent that it continues to build
on to this day, PRESERVING PROPERTY
RIGHTS NATIONWIDE.. The Institute’s cutting-edge
property rights litigation also extends to challenging the ABUSE OF CIVIL FORFEITURE LAWS and WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF HOMES AND
BUSINESSES. We also team up with PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN of the UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL to weigh in on
landmark property rights cases before the U.S. SUPREME COURT. – THE INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE (*Another excellent organization that is representing
American citizens in unlawful forfeitures and “eminent domain” abuse cases is
the Paragon Foundation. I recommend it highly! More information about them
and an example of some of their work can be found below under “2nd
Amendment” They are mostly famous for their property rights cases, but they
aren’t limited to them. Check them out! – OL) End of Part 5 Thank you for coming! All emphasis unless otherwise noted
is mine. I encourage you to check the information found here for
yourself and then please, please pass it on to everyone you
care about! Part 6 will be coming soon. – Your OUTLAWLADY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||