ILLUMINATI COVER-UP -
PROOF: BIBLE IS FACT!
(Part 4)

[Cont. from Part 3]

TESTIMONY OF A
CONDEMNED MAN

        Less than 50 years after Jesus' death and resurrection, a Syrian, IGNATIUS - who was the bishop of Antioch and a student of the apostle John - was thrown to the wild beasts in Rome. At his death, Ignatius left a legacy of seven epistles, IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS OF THE EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH. In one of them, written during his journey to Antioch (where a certain and terrifying death awaited him), he wrote of Christ's death:

        "HE was crucified and died under Pontius Pilate. He really, and NOT MERELY IN APPEARANCE, was crucified, and died, in the sight of beings in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth. HE ALSO ROSE AGAIN IN THREE DAYS...On the day of the preparation, then, at the third hour, He received the sentence from Pilate, the Father permitting that to happen; at the sixth hour He was crucified; at the ninth hour He gave up the ghost; and before sunset He was buried. During the Sabbath, He continued under the earth in the tomb in which Joseph of Arimathaea had laid Him."

JESUS WAS
(IS) REAL!

        JESUS IS NOT A MYTH. He was not an invisible spirit. He was as real as we are, as Ignatius stressed: "He was carried in the womb, even as we are, for the USUAL period of time; and was really BORN, as we also are; and was in reality nourished with MILK, and partook of COMMON MEAT and DRINK, even as we do. And when he had lived among men for thirty years, He was BAPTIZED by John, REALLY and NOT IN APPEARANCE; and when He had preached the gospel three years, and done signs and wonders, HE WHO WAS HIMSELF THE JUDGE was judged by the JEWS, falsely so-called,
(this is important: he is saying Jesus' accusers weren't really Jews!) and by Pilate the governor; was SCOURGED, was SMITTEN ON THE CHEEK, was SPIT upon; He wore a CROWN OF THORNS and a PURPLE ROBE; He was condemned: HE WAS CRUCIFIED IN REALITY, and NOT IN APPEARANCE, NOT IN IMAGINATION, NOT IN DECEIT. HE REALLY DIED, AND WAS BURIED, AND ROSE FROM THE DEAD..."

        Ignatius repeatedly used the expression "not in APPEARANCE." It seemed to be very important to him that his readers understood that he KNEW what he is talking about, and that he was not telling a parable (a fictional story with a lesson in it - such as a myth or a fairy tale), but rather relating a FACTUAL account of something that REALLY happened! So, how do we know that Ignatius himself was a REAL person, and that he knew what he was talking about? From the writings of Ignatius, which are well-documented in his seven Epistles which have been authenticated by numerous historians, both secular and religious. The two main things that make Ignatius unique as a witness, though, are:

                1) The events described in the Bible DURING IGNATIUS' LIFETIME; and
                2) KNOWING HE WAS SOON TO DIE, what reason would Ignatius
                    have to LIE? This happened again and again with Jesus' followers

SAVIOR
FOR ALL

        In an ARABIC manuscript entitled, 'Book of History Guided by All the Virtues of Wisdom. Crowned with Various Philosophies and Blessed by the Truth of Knowledge,' (Whew! What a title!) is found the following quotation from a captured Jewish commander:

        "At this time there was a wise man who was called JESUS. And his conduct was good, and [He] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the OTHER NATIONS became his disciples. Pilate condemned Him to be crucified and to die. And those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that HE HAD APPEARED TO THEM three days AFTER his crucifixion and that He was ALIVE; accordingly, HE WAS PERHAPS THE MESSIAH concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders."

1 CHANCE IN
100,000,000,000,000,000!

        Author and top physiologist Dr. A.C. Ivy answers the skeptics and "scientific" community: "...I am not ashamed to let the world know what I believe, and that I can intellectually defend my belief...On the basis of historical evidence of existing biological knowledge, the scientist who is TRUE TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE can doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ, but he cannot DENY it. Because TO DO SO MEANS THAT HE CAN PROVE THAT IT DID NOT OCCUR...To deny the resurrection of Jesus Christ on the basis of what biology now knows is to manifest an UNSCIENTIFIC attitude according to my philosopy of the true scientific attitude."

ODDS
ASTRONOMICAL!

        Peter Stoner, one-time Chairman of the Departments of Mathematics and Astronomy at Pasadena City College, and a well-respected author, examined the following incidents in the life of Christ, which were prophesied in the Old Testament:

                            1) Born at Bethlehem [Micah 5:2]
                            2) Preceded by a messenger (John the Baptist) [Isaiah 40:3]
                            3) Would enter Jerusalem on a donkey [Zechariah 9:9]
                            4) Would be betrayed by a friend (Judas Iscariot) [Psalms 41:9]
                                and sold for 30 pieces of silver [Zechariah 11:12]
                            5) The silver would be thrown into God's house [Zechariah 11:13]
                                and used to buy the Potter's Field to bury strangers [Zechariah 11:13]
                            6) He would stand dumb before His accusers [Isaiah 53:7]
                            7) He would be crucified with thieves [Isaiah 53:12]
                            8) His hands and feet would be pierced [Zechariah 12:10]

        Basing his figures on the science of probability, Stoner and his associates compute the possibility of the above prophecies coming true: "...We find that the chance that any man might have lived down to the present time and FULFILLED ALL EIGHT PROPHECIES is 1 in 1017 (1 chance in 100,000,000,000,000,000)."

GOD'S AUTHORSHIP
CONFIRMED

        Stoner illustrates it by telling us to "...take 1017 SILVER DOLLARS and lay them on the FACE OF TEXAS. They will cover ALL of the state TWO FEET DEEP. Now MARK one of these silver dollars and stir the whole mass thoroughly, all over the state. BLINDFOLD a man and tell him that he can travel as far as he wishes, but he must pick up one silver dollar and say that this is the RIGHT one. What chance would he have of getting the right one? "Just the same chance that the prophets would have had of writing these eight prophecies and having them all come true in any one man, from their day to the present time, providing they wrote them IN THEIR OWN WISDOM." (But they DIDN'T!)

        After finishing his computations, Peter Stoner presented his unquestionable conclusions: "NOW THESE PROPHECIES WERE EITHER GIVEN BY INSPIRATION OF GOD OR THE PROPHETS JUST WROTE THEM DOWN AS THEY THOUGHT THEY SHOULD BE. In such a case, the prophets had just ONE CHANCE IN 1017 of having them come true in any man, but they ALL came true in Christ. This means that the fulfillment of these eight prophecies also proves that GOD INSPIRED THE WRITING OF THOSE PROPHECIES to a definiteness which lacks only one chance in 1017 (WHEW!) of being
absolute."

DOCUMENTS
AUTHENTICATED

        In 'Evidence That Demands a Verdict,' Josh McDowell presents over 60 Old Testament prophecies concerning the life of Christ that were fulfilled. But, the actual figure runs into the hundreds: In 'The Basis of Christian Faith,' Floyd Hamilton tells us that "Canon Liddon is [the] authority for the statement that there are in the Old Testament 332 DISTINCT PREDICTIONS which were LITERALLY fulfilled in Christ." On considering only 48 of those prophecies, Stoner says, "...We find the chance that any one man fulfilled all 48 prophecies to be 1 in 10157. The odds of ALL the Bible prophecies coming true in the life of one person...is ONE IN 87 FOLLOWED BY 93 ZEROES!" (But, they DID - in the life of JESUS!)

        Thousands of scientists representing all different faiths, and coming from all over the world - many of whom began with completely humanistic and secular (worldly) views about the Bible - have authenticated the AGE of the documents that contain the prophecies - and all scientific records - including secular ones - agree that there was indeed a man named "Jesus" who was born, lived and died during the EXACT period described in the Bible! The ONLY contention between them is Jesus' DIVINITY. In almost every case, it isn't really a matter of questioning it for scientific reasons - but because they don't WANT to belive Jesus was God's Son. For that would mean that GOD IS REAL
and they would then need to change their lifestyles!

BIBLE WRITTEN WHILE
JESUS YET LIVED!

       EXAMPLE: For thousands of years people have believed that the Bible was written several hundred years after the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus. But, the discovery of hundreds of Hebrew and Aramaic scrolls put that theory to rest permanently. Now the fact that the so-called "DEAD SEA SCROLLS" were discovered in eleven caves in Qumran (approx. 10 miles south of Jericho), and further south at Murabba`at, Seelim, and Masada is old news. But, I bet you weren't told how much these scrolls AUTHENTICATED THE KING JAMES BIBLE - nor some of the more interesting and important facts that came out of that discovery. Such as:

        According to Emanuel Tov ('The Oxford Companion to the Bible' 1993), "...Their antiquity, disputed at first by a few scholars, is now beyond doubt, and dates BETWEEN 250 BCE (Before Christ) and 70CE (After Christ)* have been secured by carbon-14 tests, archaeological evidence, and paleography. The scrolls are kept in the Rockefeller and Israel Museums in Jerusalem, and ONLY THE MAJOR ONES ARE SHOWN TO THE PUBLICW...Some of the artifacts found near the scrolls are identical with artifacts found in the community buildings. Furthermore, the sectarian (non-religious) writings found in the caves describe the lifestyle of a community that would suit the buildings."

        [NOTES: *Do you understand the significance of these dates? Jesus died and was resurrected in 35 AD. This collection spans a period of 252 years before Jesus' birth to a mere 35 years after His death and resurrection (can you remember 35 years ago? I certainly can - quite clearly!). That means that parts of the Bible (the New Testament) were written WHILE JESUS WAS STILL ALIVE - not several hundred years later (when memories have dimmed)! Considering we know that more than 500 people personally saw Jesus after His death, some of THESE writers must have been EYEWITNESSES TO HIS RESURRECTION!!
       WThere's that name again: ROCKEFELLER (America's #1 Agent of Satan)! I have only one question for Mr. Rockefeller: Which parts of these scrolls are you NOT permitting the public to see? And WHY?? - OL]

A NEW LOOK
AT THE PAST

        "Among the scrolls found in Qumran and at Masada are several Hebrew and Aramaic apocryphal* and pseudepigraphalW works," reports Tov. [These were] "previously known only in ancient translations or from medieval sources...the books of Julilees, Enoch, Sirach, and the Testament of Levi are now known in their original Hebrew or Aramaic form...Similar scrolls from the beginning of the second century CE have been found in other places in the Judean Desert...In eleven Qumran caves, roughly
190 biblical scrolls have been found...With the exception of Esther, ALL BOOKS OF THE HEBREW BIBLE ARE REPRESENTED AT QUMRAN, some by many scrolls (Deuteronomy, Isaiah, Psalms), others by a single copy.

        "The great majority of the scrolls are written in the Aramaic script, while sixteen are written in the paleo-Hebrew (or Old Hebrew) script. Most of the scrolls have the same spelling as the Masoretic Text (MT), but a significant number are written with a previously unknown form of spelling, which frequently uses letters to indicate vowels. Some scholars argue that the scrolls displaying this special spelling were written by the Qumran scribes, for all the sectarian scrolls are written in this spelling as well. The Biblical scrolls from the Dead Sea area show what the Biblical text looked like in the last three centuries BCE and the first century CE..."

        [NOTES: *"The word 'apocrapha'...is used to designate a group of important religious writings from antiquity that are not universally regarded as belonging to the authentic canon of Scripture."
       W"The word 'pseudepigrapha' is the transliteration of a Greek word meaning 'with false subscriptions,' referring to books written under an assumed name'." - Oxford Companion to the Bible]

WHAT? NO CARD
CATALOGUE?!

        "...the textual picture presented by the Qumran scrolls represents a textual variety that was probably typical for the period. Although most of the scrolls have been analyzed, the nature of the collection of scrolls found in the Qumran caves is still not known. While some scholars continue to refer to the contents of these caves as the 'library' of the sect, others consider it a haphazard collection of works deposited there for posterity in the difficult days of the destruction of Jerusalem in 67-70 CE...

        "Biblical, apocryphal, and sectarian works were found in the same caves...some scholars believe that the sect's concept of scripture was more encompassing than the collection that eventually became the Jewis canon."

A MATTHEW'S
ORIGINAL?

        If what you have read so far hasn't sufficiently blown your mind, check this out: in his April 2001 "Personal Update," Chuck Missler of Koinonia House has an article about an amazing discovery of fragments possibly from the ORIGINAL Book of Matthew:

        "In the late 19th century, Charles B. Huleatt, an Egyptologist, acquired three small fragments of papyrus that were unearthed in Upper Egypt and subsequently bequeathed them to his Alma Mater, Magdalen College, Oxford, in 1901. These three segments contain the Greek text of Matthew's Gospel, Chapter 26, verses 23 and 31. There are a total of 24 lines, text on both sides. (This implies that they were part of a codex - a book with pages rather than a traditional scroll, which was written on the smooth side only. These were beginning to make their appearance during the Gospel period. In his final letter, Paul requested Timothy to bring his notebooks to him.)

VERBATIM
RECORD

        "In 1953, Colin H. Roberts, a notable British papyrologist, declared that these papyrus fragments were probably from the late second century A.D. It would be [more than] 40 years later (1994) that advanced technology would reveal that these three small fragments are apparently the OLDEST New Testament manuscripts in existence, CONTEMPORANEOUS WITH THE APOSTLES THEMSELVES AND OTHER EYE WITNESSES! In 1994, Dr. Carsten Peter Thiede, Director of the Institute of Basic
Epistemological Research in Paderborn, Germany, used a scanning laser microscope to more carefully examine these fragments, P. Magdalen Greek 17/P64,' as they are formally designated. A scanning laser microscope can now differentiate between the twenty midrometer (millionth of a meter) layers of papyrus, measuring the height and depth of the ink, and can even determine the angle of the stylus (pen) used by the scribe.

        "Dr. Thiede compared the fragments with four other known references: a manuscript from Qumran, dated to 58 A.D.; one from the Herculaneum, dated prior to 79 A.D.; one from Masada, dated between 73-74 A.D.; and one from the Egyptian town of Oxyrynchus, dated 65-66 A.D. He astounded the scholastic world by concluding that the Magdalen fragments were either an ORIGINAL from Matthew's Gospel, or an IMMEDIATE COPY, written while Matthew and the other disciples and other eye witnesses WERE STILL ALIVE! Matthew's skills in shorthand (an essential requirement for a customs
official in a society devoid of printing, copiers, and the like) are evident in his inclusion of the extensive discourses, which he apparently was able to record VERBATIM (word-for-word!). The Magdalen papyrus discovery is distinctive in that it was dated on the basis of physical evidence rather than a literary theory or historical suppositions. This is just an example of how advanced technology can reveal discoveries IN EXISTING ARTIFACTS."

LIBERALS LACK
CREDIBILITY

        Renowned Jewish archaeologist Nelson Glueck wrote: "It may be stated categorically that NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERY HAS EVER CONTROVERTED (opposed, disputed) A BIBLICAL REFERENCE." (Whew! Now THAT is quite a statement!) Another archeologist, William F. Albright, states "...Discovery after discovery has established the ACCURACY of innumerable details, and has brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a SOURCE OF HISTORY...Until recently it was the fashion among Biblical historians to treat the patriarchal sagas of Genesis as though they
were ARTIFICIAL CREATIONS of Israelite scribes of the Divided Monarchy or tales told by imaginative rhapsodists around Israelite campfires...[but] archaeological discoveries since 1925 have changed all that. Aside from a few die-hards among older scholars, there is scarcely a single Biblical historian who has not been impressed by the rapid accumulation of data SUPPORTING the substantial historicity of patriarchal tradition."

        Millar Burrows of Yale observes: "The excessive skepticism of many LIBERAL theologians stems not from a careful evaluation of the available data, but from an enormous PREDISPOSITION against the supernatural (and yet these same skeptics have no trouble at all embracing aliens, ghosts, "ascended masters," and Eastern religions - and believe it or not - Lucifer!)...On the whole, however, archaeolgical work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the RELIABILITY of the Scriptural record. More than one archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible increased by the experience of excavation in
Palestine...THE PICTURE FITS THE FRAME; THE MELODY AND THE ACCOMPANIMENT ARE HARMONIOUS. The force of such evidence is cumulative. The more we find that items in the picture of the past presented by the Bible...are compatible with what we know from archaeology, the stronger is our impression of general AUTHENTICITY. Mere legend of fiction would inevitably BETRAY itself by anachronisms and incongruities."*

        [NOTE: *Throughout the years, HUNDRED of archaeologists have attested the authenticity of the Scriptures - BASED ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDS (HARD evidence). If this were any other subject, in a court of law this would be a slam-dunk! Should we ignore all these finds? WHY? We certainly have no problem accepting anything the United Nations-sponsored evolution scientists claim. And they have NO "hard" evidence to back up their claims. Again and again, they admit (almost always "off-the-record!") that they are simply "theories," and yet the general public accepts them as FACT and doesn't question them or demand proof. Have we all become so BRAINWASHED, we dare not ask questions? - OL]

AN EXTREMELY
MULTICULTURAL BIBLE

        F.F. BRUCE observes: "Any part of the human body can only be properly explained in reference to the whole body. And any part of the Bible can only be properly explained in reference to the WHOLE BIBLE." At first glance, the Bible appears to be simply a collection of literature. But, according to Josh McDowell, if we examine the circumstances under which the various Biblical documents were written, we find that "The authors of the various books wrote in DIFFERENT PLACES, such as the wilderness
(Moses), prison (Paul), Patmos exile (John), etc. The biblical writings were composed on THREE DIFFERENT CONTINENTS (Africa, Asia and Europe), and in three DIFFERENT LANGUAGES (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek).* The contents of the Bible deal with many controversial subjects. Yet, the Bible is a unity. From beginning to end, there's one unfolding story of GOD'S PLAN OF SALVATION FOR MANKIND...through the person of JESUS CHRIST. - John 14:6 The UNITY of the Bible is a strong argument in favor of its DIVINE inspiration."

        To illustrate how incredible this is, find 10 people from your area, with similar education, speaking the same language, from the same culture (a neat trick in itself these days!) and ask them to separate and write their opinion on only ONE controversial subject. When they have finished, compare their conclusions. Do you think they will agree with each other? Of course not! But the 40 WRITERS of the Bible, with extremely diverse educational backgrounds, speaking three different languages, and from many different cultures, writing on hundreds of subjects, managed to achieve complete HARMONY, which CANNOT BE EXPLAINED by coincidence or collusion. Even the French skeptic, ROUSSEAU, saw something different in the Scriptures: "I must confess to you that the majesty of the Scriptures astonishes me; the holiness of the evangelists speaks to my heart and has such striking characters of TRUTH, and is, moreover, so perfectly INIMITABLE, that if it had been the invention of men, The 'inventors' would be GREATER THAN THE GREATEST HEROES."

        [NOTE: *If this really was a matter of collusion, as the skeptics claim, HOW on earth did these writers communicate (and by the way, they weren't multi-lingual) over thousands of years across three continents?! So much for the theory that a group of men somehow got together (Where? WHEN?) and "made it all up" (the Bible), so they would be able to "keep the people in line." You know, when you think about it, the ONES WHO ARE SELLING THIS LINE (the media, anti-Christian advocates and organizations) sure have a lot of room to talk about "brainwashing" to "keep the people in line," don't they?
        Two FACTS we should bear in mind: The Bible has been read by more people and published in more languages than any other book, and according to 'The Cambridge History of the Bible,' "No other book has known anything approaching this constant circulation." This includes the Torah, the Koran, Shakespeare, Homer, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, etc., etc. Also, none of the other prophets, i.e., Buddah, Muhammad, etc., have ever claimed to be the Son of God - only JESUS did. In addition to the above, no one has ever been able to prove one LIE in the Bible. But, there is more. I have already
proven that the Bible is SCIENTIFICALLY correct. Now, I will show you once again that there is also very REAL (we would call it "hard" in a court of law) evidence to prove the Bible is HISTORICALLY correct. And if THAT is true, on what basis should we deny its DIVINITY?

THE LAW
THAT NEVER WAS

        Concerned over a rumor that a particular DENOMINATION would be recognized as the official "state church," the Danbury Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut sent a letter to President Jefferson, expressing their fears. On January 1st of 1802, President Jefferson sent his response: "I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the FREE EXERCISE thereof,' thus building a WALL OF SEPARATION between Church and State."

        Not being a Baptist himself, President Jefferson chose a phrase they could readily identify with to reassure them. The actual meaning becomes very clear when read in the context that it was written. Here is the ACTUAL wording:

WALL INTENDED TO
PROTECT CHURCH

        "When they have opened a gap in the hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world, God hath ever broke down the wall itself...And that therefore if He will eer please to restore His garden and paradise again, it must of necessity be walled in peculiarly unto Himself FROM THE WORLD..." As historical researcher and Constitutional expert David Barton explains it: "According to Williams, the 'wall of separation' is to protect the 'garden of the church' from the wilderness of the world.' That 'wall' is...introduced as, and understood to be, a ONE-directional wall PROTECTING THE CHURCH FROM THE GOVERNMENT..." Everything in our country has changed as a result of this particular phrase, causing us to be stripped of the Constitutional protection of our God-given rights and placed under a SOCIALIST DICTATORSHIP. I cannot stress this strongly enough: this phrase does NOT come from the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, or even the Bill of Rights - Supreme Court rulings and Bill Clinton's protestations, notwithstanding. As you have seen, this much-cited phrase actually comes from Thomas Jefferson's PRIVATE correspondence with a church!

        A LETTER???!! Dear Lord in Heaven: Our God-given rights were stripped, our country turned into a Modern Day BABYLON, and condemned to the fate of Sodom - all because of a PRIVATE LETTER?!!! Surely, this is all just some kind of a legal misunderstanding? Not a chance! We are talking about the Supreme Court, for crying out loud! Their job is to interpret the constitutionality of congressional bills - NOT MAKE LAW. Only the Congress can do that - not even the President with his "executive orders," let alone the Supreme Court! They have failed miserably! Are we to believe that each of them reached their supreme positions of power being completely ignorant of the US Constitution - the "SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND?" Read it for yourself. The Constitution is not written in incoherent legalese! The First Amendment is quite simple and very clear:

THE SUPREME
COURT'S AGENDA

        "Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE thereof." (What part of "NO" do they not understand? Even toddlers can figure THAT word out: mine learned that immediately after "Ma-ma" and "Da-da!") How much clearer could they have made it? If you look up the backgrounds of the Supreme Court of the 1960s, you will find that it was comprised of admitted and documented Marxists and Communist-sympathizers, who - knowing EXACTLY what the Constitution says - deliberately began its destruction through outright LIES! They didn't want US to know the truth, so they made their ruling - then REMOVED THE STUDY OF
THE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS FROM SCHOOL.

        Don't believe it? Ask your kids how often - or IF - they study the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights today - and if they can tell you where the phrase "separation of church and state" comes from. 99 times out of a 100, they will tell you it comes from our Constitution! Let's face facts. The Supreme Court is following their own personal agenda: the deliberate and systematic removal of the Constitutionally-mandated protection of our God-given rights, in preparation for a Socialist (read "Communist") world government. So, how far back does this plan go? All the way back to the GARDEN OF EDEN:

BIRTH OF MASONRY:
(aka the "Illuminati")

        In William T. Still's 'New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies,' we read that "Masonry can be traced back more than 5,000 years to the secret societies of the ancient Egyptian priests. Masons who visit the tombs of ancient Egypt are astounded by the RELIGIOUS symbols painted upon the walls. There displayed before them are the same grips, signs, postures, symbols, and even the apron,* used for their own initiation. But some Masonic authors claim even greater antiquity. One Masonic writer claims it is older than any religion today and states that it originated in 'remote antiquity...The Order existed...as a compact, well-organized body long before the building of the oldest
pyramid.'

        "According to General Albert Pike, head of American Masonry in the late 1800s, and still today regarded as the guiding light of modern Masonry: 'With her tradions reaching back to the earliest times, and her symbols dating farther back than even the monumental history of Egypt extends...it is [still the same as] it was in the cradle of the human race, WHEN NO HUMAN FOOT HAD TRODDEN THE SOIL
OF ASSYRIA AND EGYPT'."W

        [NOTE: *This is a mockery of Genesis 3:7 "And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons."
       WThis would take it back to before The Flood - in fact, probably all the way back to Cain and Abel. In other words, SHORTLY AFTER THEY WERE THROWN OUT OF EDEN! - OL]

SLOUCHING
TOWARDS
ARMAGEDDON

        The most amazing and undeniable thing about the Bible (and the thing that separates it from other so-called "holy books") is its unerring PROPHECY. Aside from the ones concerning JESUS' birth, death and resurrection, it specifies with 100% ACCURACY the things that are happening in the present day AND - the FUTURE of this planet clear to the END OF THE WORLD (as we know it)!

        To prove it, I am going to present some of those prophecies and show you how they are being carried out today TO THE LETTER (I remind you again that these prophecies were written thousands of years ago - long before some of these things were technologically possible)! When I have finished with them, I will show you how YOU CAN CONTROL YOUR OWN FUTURE!

THE COMING NEW
SATANIC ORDER

        "And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. For MANY SHALL COME IN MY NAME, saying, I am Christ; and shall DECEIVE MANY. and ye shall hear of WARS and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
        "For NATION SHALL RISE AGAINST NATION, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be FAMINES, and PESTILENCES, and EARTHQUAKES IN DIVERSE PLACES. All these are the BEGINNING of sorrows." - Matthew 24:4-8

        At the end of this Special Report - we will name and examine those who are currently coming in The Messiah's name. Their stories are fascinating - especially in the way that they personify the Biblical descriptions of the AntiChrist and his army of lesser false messiahs!

PREPARING FOR
GLOBAL SLAVERY

        Back in 1806, Prussia created a new educational system. Professor Johan Fitche of the University of Berlin explained that the children would be taken over and told what to think and how to think it. In time GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH HEGEL took over Fitche's chair at the university.

        To Hegel, the world is a world of reason. The State is Absolute Reason and the citizen can only become free by worship and obedience to the STATE. According to Hegel, the State is the "MARCH OF GOD IN THE WORLD"* and the "FINAL END." This "final end" has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the state. Both Fascism and Communism have their philosophical roots in Hegelianism.

        [NOTE: *"March of GOD?!" Now, that's quite a line coming from the man who had the audacity to pronounce God "DEAD!" And exactly when was it that God died and left Hegel and the Humanist (atheistic) Liberals in charge?! Who notified you? I want you to PROVE it!! - OL]

A COMMIE
PROPHECIES

        Do these statements have any relevance today? Read your paper. Watch the news. Then ask yourself: If this wasn't the Son of God, how did these "church leaders" know what was going to happen thousands of years in the future? even the "great" Miss Cleo can't do that. And she certainly doesn't have the Bible's accuracy: 100%!

        Back in 1848, Friedrich Engels (co-author of the "Communist Manifesto" made an amazing statement: "THE NEXT WORLD WAR* will make whole reactionary peoples disappear from the face of the earth. This, too, is progress. Obviously, this cannot be fulfilled without crushing some delicate national flower. But without VIOLENCE and without PITILESSNESS nothing can be obtained in history."

        [NOTE: *the NEXT?! THERE HADN'T BEEN ANY WORLD WARS yet! Kinda gives one the idea that Engels may have known something the rest of us didn't! Like maybe he was privy to future information (12 YEARS LATER!):

PIKE'S
MASTER PLAN

        In 1860 (140 years ago. Talk about patience!), the LEAGUE of JUST MEN revealed their "MASTER PLAN" for creating a One-World government: "Albert Pike (an American general) was recruited into the Conspiracy to come up with a Master Plan... Strangely, Pike's Plan so closely followed the sequence of events prophesied thousands of years ago, that it would almost seem as if he was TRYING to follow the Bible! Check it out:

                WORLD WAR I will be to...destroy the house of the Czar of Russia and to
                   make Russia a breeding ground for Communists and atheistic beliefs.

(MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!)

                WORLD WAR II [will be] fought to drastically STRENGTHEN Russia. Then
                    there will be a balancing of power until the time is right for World War III.

(MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!)

                WORLD WAR III is...to be between ISRAEL and the rest of the MIDDLE
                    EAST, forcing the entire world to choose sides (between God and
                    Lucifer)...when the Nations of the world are at their weakest point, the
                    Conspiracy plans to 'call in their chips' and take full control."

(As I said: STRAIGHT OUT OF THE BIBLE!)

EVOLUTION
By DESIGN

        The media are constantly pushing EVOLUTIONARY "evidence," and I have a big problem with their methods: they announce these so-called "findings" as though they are gospel (from God's lips to their ears!) but when you break it down, it turns out to be either fraudulent or just another "theory." By the way, you'll never hear them mention the fact that when CHARLES DARWIN was dying, he admitted evolution was just a theory, and he was NEVER able to find even one shred of evidence that it was true! Did you know that - along with Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels - Darwin was hired and promoted by
John D. Rockefeller - and the "League of Just Men"? Darwin was not the originator of the ideas that have led to the abandonment of belief in the existence of objective, transcendent truth. Darwin's theory of evolution not only discredits the Biblical version of how man came to be, but it also "proves" the "inferiority of women."

        "...Darwin's role was to dignify these ideas with (so-called) 'scientific' backing and to make them accessible to the average man in terms he could understand," observed Jane H. Ingraham. "His shattering 'explanation' of the evolution of man from the lower animals through means EXCLUDING THE SUPERNATURAL delivered the coup de grace to man's idea of himself as a created being in a world of fixed truth. Confronted with the 'scientific proof' of his own animal origin and nature, Western man, SET FREE AT LAST FROM GOD,* began the long trek through Scientific Rationalism, Environmental
Determinism, Cultural Conditioning, Perfectability of Human Nature, Behaviorism, and SECULAR HUMANISM to TODAY'S INVERTED MORALITY and TOTALITARIAN man."

        [NOTE: *WHOOPIE!FREE! (thank Darwin almighty?) Free at last: No more Ten Commandments. No more Golden Rule. No more Conscience. Whee! Party time - like at the Foot of the Mountain, maybe?! Oops! Well, maybe that's not such a good idea: remember what happened to THEM? - OL]

GOO GOO! GA GA!
GRRRRRRRRRR!

        Darwin's influence is being embraced by Liberals throughout the world. As a result some of the more outrageously sexist and chauvinistic writers and "experts" are now gaining credibility: Gustave Le Bon (a pioneer in the collective behavior field) wrote that "even in...the most intelligent races...are a large number of women whose brains are closer in size to those of GORILLAS than to the most developed male brains. This inferiority is so obvious that no one can contest it for a moment; only its degree is worth discussion...

        Women...represent the most inferior forms of human evolution and...are closer to CHILDREN and SAVAGES than to an adult, civilized man.(!) They excel in fickleness, inconsistency, absence of thought and logic, and incapacity to reason. Without a doubt there exists some distinguished women, very superior to the average man but they are as exceptional as the birth of any MONSTROSITY, as, for example, of A GORILLA WITH TWO HEADS; consequently, we may neglect them entirely. Re-evaluation of the conclusion that females are less intelligent finds both major flaws in the evidence that 'proves' women's inferiority and in major aspects of evolution theory." (Aw, shucks! I'll bet you say this to all the women!)

KEEPIN' THEM
IN
THE BEDROOM

        "Darwin teaches that human sex differences are due partly to sexual selection, specifically because men must prove themselves physically and intellectually superior to other men in the competition for women, whereas WOMEN must be superior primarily in SEXUAL attraction...

        "Because 'the strongest party always carries off the prize,' the result is that 'a weak man, unless he be a good hunter...is seldom permitted to keep a wife that a stronger man thinks worth his notice'."

A LOWER
FORM

        Well, judging by how little women wear these days - and how sex-starved they are being portrayed - apparently women BOUGHT Darwin's teachings! But, why in heaven's name would any woman in her right mind choose Darwin's view of them, when God compares them to 'a CROWN' and describes their value as 'ABOVE RUBIES'?! In contrast, Darwin compares us to animals and lower forms of life:

        "...Since humans evolve from animals, and 'no one disputes that the bull differs in disposition from the cow, the wild-boar from the sow, the stallion from the mare...the males of the larger apes from the females,' the same must be true with human females...Further, some of the traits of women 'are characteristic of the LOWER RACES, and therefore of a past and lower state of civilization..."*

        [NOTE: *MERCY! Would somebody please explain to me why FEMINISTS - who are always yelling for "equal rights" and claiming they can do anything a man can do as well as he can, or better - would even consider embracing this idiot and his even more idiotic "theories?" Kinda makes me wonder if Darwin might have had a point, after all: just how dumb CAN we get?! -OL]

[Cont. in Part 5]

SOURCES

'Ancient Secrets of The Bible' by Charles E. Sellier & Brian Russell - Dell Publishing 1994
'Beyond and Back' by Ralph Wilkerson - Bantam Publishing - 6/77
"The End Times & Victorious Living" Edited by Joseph R. Chambers, D.D., D.S.L. 5-6/01
'Final Warning: Economic Collapse and the Coming World Government' by Grant R.
Jeffrey
- Harvest House Publishers 1996
The Holy Bible, King James Version
'New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies' by William T. Still - Huntington
House Publishers - 1990
"Personal Update" Edited by Chuck Missler - Koinonia House 12/97; 4/01; 6/01

HOMEPAGE