THE

NEWSLETTER

APRIL

2007

Welcome to the

issue of the WEATHERFUN Newsletter


Words From Jerry
Greetings fellow Weatherfun members and welcome to your April issue of the Weatherfun Newsletter and Jerry's Words.
Please excuse the shortness of this month's Jerry's Words. Due to continued health problem I am still not back to 100% health wise, so this will be a short one.
Well, weather wise spring is supposed to be here but we continue to have very cool to cold temperatures here in Rhode Island and snow showers are still in our immediate forecast. Here we are Easter coming up on Sunday and we are supposed to only have temps in the upper 40's for Easter Sunday. Rain Wednesday could end as a little light snow. It sure has been one weird winter. The first part above normal temps with no snow, and the second very cold with some snow. We ended the winter with only about 15 inches of snow. Way below normal for my area.
Again the severe weather is here folks. We have already had several tornado's in the south. As per my post of last week keep in mind that if you are in the line of severe weather rest assured that there is always a Weatherfun member right at the end of your cell phone to give you assistance in pulling up a radar screen and also NWS warnings for your area. This is what the Weatherfun family is all about folks. One family member helping another family member in time of need.
REUNION: The reunion is fast approaching. Because of my health problems I am behind in contacting the Motel to get the information on the rooms, but I hope to do that on Wednesday the third and as soon as I have that information I will pass it your way. I have started to received e-mails from members who will be attending this years reunion, and it looks like a great time folks. Why not head northeast to Rhode Island and join us?
Remember that this is your newsletter. If you have a topic that you would like to see in the next issue why not send it to Bill or me and we will see what we can do about adding it our next issue.
Till next month think spring and the 2007 Weatherfun Family Reunion.

March's Weather
  • 1st: Blizzard conditions from Wisconsin to upper Michigan with up to 20 inches of snow, while in the SE there was severe weather that resulted in 20 deaths with at least 47 tornadoes reported. Alabama and Georgia were the hardest hit.
  • 5th-6th: Arctic air moved across the Great Lakes to the East Coast bringing Wind Chills well below zero. At least 4 deaths were reported in upper New York due to the weather.
  • 8th: An Arctic Front brought frigid weather to the Northeast with several cities setting record Low temperatures. Below zero readings were common.
  • 11th: A wildfire burned 1,000 acres in Southern California helped with dry, hot winds that forced the evacuation of about 200 homes.
  • 12th: Cooler temperature and higher humidity overnight allowed firefighters to gain the upper hand on the Southern California wildfire that blackened more than 2,000 acres and forced the evacuation of 500 homes. Flooding caused by torrential rainstorms swept cars off roads in central Texas causing 2 deaths. Brownsville, TX had 3.3" of rain in 31 minutes.
  • 14th: Much of the country enjoyed milder than normal temperatures with the Southwest reach into the 90s with near record breaking heat.
  • 16th-17th: A Nor'ester brought heavy rain, sleet, snow and freezing rain from Virginia to Maine causing major travel problems on both the ground and the air. Many area away from the coast from New York to Maine had over a foot of snow.
  • 21st: More than 5 inches of rain fell in parts of north central Oklahoma flooding roads, while further north heavy rain and thunderstorms moved through Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan with damaging hail.
  • 23rd: Storms that produced at least 13 tornadoes swept along New Mexico's border with Texas, destroying homes and other buildings and injuring at least 16. While Indiana had areas hit with up to 3" of rain, flooding roadways.
  • 24th: The Pacific Northwest was hit with high winds and up to 5" of rain.
  • 25th- 27th: Summerlike temperatures in the Southeast spread northward to southern New England. While Volatile weather swept through Southern California, delivering downpours, hail, snow, and fierce winds that capsized boats and toppled power lines and trees. Nearly 160,000 customers lost power.
  • 28th: A massive storm system stretched from South Dakota to Texas on Thursday morning with flash flooding in central Nebraska and Kansas and up to 65 tornadoes farther south and in Colorado. Winter storm warnings for most of Wyoming, where heavy snow was blamed for interstate pileups. In central Wyoming's Wind River Mountains, 58 inches of snow from the storm was recorded.
  • 29th: Storms moving across North Texas brought up to 7 inches of rain in areas and led to numerous high-water rescues on flooded roads.
  • 30th: More severe weather from Texas to Oklahoma with flooding rains and several tornadoes.
  • 31st: Thunderstorms hammered parts of eastern and southeastern Texas with a few tornadoes and caused widespread power outages.

CAM OF THE MONTH
St Louis, Missouri Sky View

Links 4 You

Great Cold Wave
of February 1899

Hello New Members
  • cyclesstudies79@yahoo.com
Did You Know?

Learn all about the
NOAA All Weather Radio

CONGRATULATIONS

Steve (FL) became a Grandpa for the second time with the arrivial of Ella, who weighed in at just over 7lbs.

Letters to the Editor

The following article was sent in by Alan Cortese. We hope that you find it of interest.

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?
By Timothy Ball

Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.

What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? It would probably be the most important piece of news in the media and would generate a lot of debate. So why is it that when scientists who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years say that humans are not the cause nobody listens? Why does no one acknowledge that the Emperor has no clothes on?

Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.

No sensible person seeks conflict, especially with governments, but if we don't pursue the truth, we are lost as individuals and as a society. That is why I insist on saying that there is no evidence that we are, or could ever cause global climate change. And, recently, Yuri A. Izrael, Vice President of the United Nations sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confirmed this statement. So how has the world come to believe that something is wrong?

Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global cooling was the biggest threat: a matter of faith. "It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our species," wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.

I was as opposed to the threats of impending doom global cooling engendered as I am to the threats made about Global Warming. Let me stress I am not denying the phenomenon has occurred. The world has warmed since 1680, the nadir of a cool period called the Little Ice Age (LIA) that has generally continued to the present. These climate changes are well within natural variability and explained quite easily by changes in the sun. But there is nothing unusual going on.

Since I obtained my doctorate in climatology from the University of London, Queen Mary College, England my career has spanned two climate cycles. Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970's global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific fact. By the 1990's temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I'll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global temperature trends now indicate a cooling.

No doubt passive acceptance yields less stress, fewer personal attacks and makes career progress easier. What I have experienced in my personal life during the last years makes me understand why most people choose not to speak out; job security and fear of reprisals. Even in University, where free speech and challenge to prevailing wisdoms are supposedly encouraged, academics remain silent.

I once received a three page letter that my lawyer defined as libellous, from an academic colleague, saying I had no right to say what I was saying, especially in public lectures. Sadly, my experience is that universities are the most dogmatic and oppressive places in our society. This becomes progressively worse as they receive more and more funding from governments that demand a particular viewpoint.

In another instance, I was accused by Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki of being paid by oil companies. That is a lie. Apparently he thinks if the fossil fuel companies pay you have an agenda. So if Greenpeace, Sierra Club or governments pay there is no agenda and only truth and enlightenment?

Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. I can only consider them from what they imply. They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate. In this case, they also indicate how political the entire Global Warming debate has become. Both underline the lack of or even contradictory nature of the evidence.

I am not alone in this journey against the prevalent myth. Several well-known names have also raised their voices. Michael Crichton, the scientist, writer and filmmaker is one of them. In his latest book, "State of Fear" he takes time to explain, often in surprising detail, the flawed science behind Global Warming and other imagined environmental crises.

Another cry in the wildenerness is Richard Lindzen's. He is an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT. Linzen frequently speaks out against the notion that significant Global Warming is caused by humans. Yet nobody seems to listen.

I think it may be because most people don't understand the scientific method which Thomas Kuhn so skilfully and briefly set out in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." A scientist makes certain assumptions and then produces a theory which is only as valid as the assumptions. The theory of Global Warming assumes that CO2 is an atmospheric greenhouse gas and as it increases temperatures rise. It was then theorized that since humans were producing more CO2 than before, the temperature would inevitably rise. The theory was accepted before testing had started, and effectively became a law.

As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun." Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.

Meanwhile, politicians are being listened to, even though most of them have no knowledge or understanding of science, especially the science of climate and climate change. Hence, they are in no position to question a policy on climate change when it threatens the entire planet. Moreover, using fear and creating hysteria makes it very difficult to make calm rational decisions about issues needing attention.

Until you have challenged the prevailing wisdom you have no idea how nasty people can be. Until you have re-examined any issue in an attempt to find out all the information, you cannot know how much misinformation exists in the supposed age of information.

I was greatly influenced several years ago by Aaron Wildavsky's book "Yes, but is it true?" The author taught political science at a New York University and realized how science was being influenced by and apparently misused by politics. He gave his graduate students an assignment to pursue the science behind a policy generated by a highly publicised environmental concern. To his and their surprise they found there was little scientific evidence, consensus and justification for the policy. You only realize the extent to which Wildavsky's findings occur when you ask the question he posed. Wildavsky's students did it in the safety of academia and with the excuse that it was an assignment. I have learned it is a difficult question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most important question to ask if we are to advance in the right direction.

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (www.nrsp.com), is a Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. He can be reached at letters@canadafreepress.com

We hope that you enjoyed this month's Newsletter. See you next month, and be sure to visit the WEATHERFUN Website but most of all have fun with your weather.
Past issues of the Newsletter can be found at the Newsletter Library

Email to the Newsletter can be sent to either
Jerry or Bill

Click to subscribe to WEATHERFUN

List Owner:
Jerry

Moderators: