1
If we look at what has happened in the world during
the past hundred years, and what is still happening today, the exhibition of the
negatives in human character is discouraging: so many weaknesses and cruelties,
animalities and jealousies, pettinesses and stupidities.
2
Animal man has been violently on the rampage in our
times, robbing, hating, attacking, destroying, and killing. Spiritual man has
remained weakly in the background. Reasoning man has oscillated between the two
poles, sometimes sensitive to higher ideals in the guidance of his thinking,
more often selfishly blind to any other welfare than his own.
3
All sincere well-wishers of humanity are today
distressed in heart and doubt-ridden in mind. Baffled and bewildered, they stand
before the complex spectacle of this disordered age. Doubt is a figure always
pictured by the ancient world with a bandage across her eyes. This is the exact
condition of our age.
4
Whoever looks around at the world of the past half
century, at its negativity, its folly and insanity, its horrors, may say that it
is a wicked world, that man is incorrigibly evil. It would be fairer to
introduce a note of balance and refer to the existence of Yin and Yang in life,
in the universe, and consequently in human character.
5
It is the work of evolution in our time to bring to
the surface of thought and action the most ferocious instincts and darkest
bestiality which many men still hide beneath their civilized exterior. But such
an outbreak of evil is destined eventually to modify evil itself, to tame those
instincts and subside the bestiality. The night is darkest just before dawn.
6
The evil things we have seen and still see all
around us in contemporary humanity have come to the surface only to be carried
off again. The decadence of human society and the degeneration of the human race
which shadow contemporary history, are signs of the scum arising out of the
human subconscious. But they arise only to be cleared away. Out of this
clearance there will later come an awakening to the Good, an appreciation of the
True. In this sense their darkness is an inverted precursor of the light, the
worse which makes a way for the better. It is a token that the cycle of
materialism will eventually turn on itself and yield to a cycle of spirituality.
7
If the world's present state is so ugly and
menacing, we ought not to blame it as a failure on the part of God but rather on
the part of man.
8
The monstrous cruelty and baleful influences which
have shown their detestable faces in world history from time to time, are
reminders of how far man has yet to go in fulfilment of the World-Idea.
9
In large regions of the earth it seems as though
moral darkness has enveloped mankind. Although a fair appraisal requires us to
examine how far this swing of the pendulum against established religion
represents rebellion against its superstition and imposture and how far it
represents a real loss of conscience and deterioration of character, there is
still enough residue of evil to instigate apprehension as to the future course
and results of this situation.
10
Anyone who has travelled this wide earth knows
that there are greedy men who are like ferocious tigers, and smooth-tongued
women who are as dangerous as devouring serpents. The evil of such people lies
not so much in the character which they reveal as in the character which they
hide. It is the suave dissembler who reproduces the words of goodness without
its heart and who cynically divorces creed from conduct that we must fear,
rather than the man who has "scoundrel" stamped all over his face and actions.
We are not apt to be on our guard against a silky voice, saintly manner, and
smiling lips, but when these things hide a devil's heart of dark intentions, we
are in peril of being undone.
11
It is true that the respectable often hides the
rotten.
12
Whether they call it evil and sin with the
Christians, or ignorance and immaturity with the Hindus, or insufficiency of the
good with the Platonic thinker, or weakness and failure, or the blindness of
materialism, the presence of deplorable or horrible or criminal tendencies need
not be denied. They are in the world, but then, other better nobler and purer
tendencies are also there.
13
There are savage creatures, moral monsters, and
insane animals who look like men but have only partially entered into the human
species in their passage up from lower ones. Having human faces and limbs,
digestive and sense organs, is not enough to render them worthy of human
classification.
14
If there is so much more interest in the spiritual
truth, there is also much more interest in its sinister reversions and
perversions, in black magic, satanic forces, the misuse of drugs and the abuse
of sex, witchcraft, sorcery, influencing others through mental means for selfish
ends, and worship of the powers of darkness. Young naïve and unbalanced persons
seeking occult thrills and excitements, or recklessly curious about (to them)
psychical novelties, are brought into foul malignant circles where their
character is degraded and their understanding twisted.
15
The sinister spread of black magic, witchcraft,
sexual perversion, and drug addiction in our own time is menacing. Some of their
votaries are consciously worshipping demonic powers, evil as such, others only
because they have been misled into the belief that it is the Good.(P)
16
We find that the character of these black
magicians contains much of cruelty and hatred. To inflict suffering on others
gives them pleasure: and this is not necessarily a reference to those who have
studied what is technically known as "black magic." It may also refer to
cold-blooded scientists and politicians, misguided idealists and statesmen,
obsessed drug addicts and one-sided vivisectors.
17
The world today, more fiercely than ever, is a
battleground for this ancient conflict between Right and Wrong.
18
Various kinds and degrees of madness have appeared
in the world in various expressions - in the forms of immorality, in the
frictions of politics, and in the teachings of religion.
19
If there is infinite love in or behind the world,
there is also infinite suffering in the world, as Buddha noted.
20
The evil forces have stirred up evil events and
provocative crises, and striven to get the masses to react to them in an evil
way.
21
If you could trace out the intricate ramifications
of the effects of all your actions, you would find that the good ones were
eventually shadowed by evil, and the evil ones brightened by good. This idea may
seem strange when first heard of, and may require some analysis to make it seem
plausible. But if you ponder on it, you will begin to understand why modern
European thinkers like Schopenhauer and Spengler and modern Hindu seers like
Atmananda and Vivekananda reject the belief that the world's evil is growing
less as much as they reject the assertion that it is growing more. If we compare
the general moral level of different centuries, some sort of a balance between
the good and evil can be seen. If we are to look for any striking advance in the
good, we shall have to look for it not in the masses but in single individuals
who are seeking and nearing the Overself. This is because our planet is like a
class at school where the average standard remains not too widely different. The
progress and deterioration which appear at times do not alter this fact, since
they appear within these maximum and minimum levels and shift about from one
part of the planet to another. There is no room here for undue optimism but
neither is there any for undue pessimism. The savage of low degree may be taught
the tricks of science until he can shoot from atomic artillery instead of from
stringed bows, but he still remains a savage. Recent history has shown this
plainly and revealed civilization as a fact in technics only and as a myth in
morals.
22
Coming events cast their good or evil
configuration beforehand upon calm, sensitive souls. That the unseen hand of
destiny is unfolding the vivid scenes of a unique drama is evident to them. That
the contemporary currents of world-throbbing happenings are but presages
indicating that a radical shift-over in human existence is upon us is also clear
to them. In geological history, earthquakes are a means adopted by Nature to
restore a disturbed equilibrium. In human history, wartime world-upheaval is
both karma's way of attaining equilibrium in an unbalanced society and
evolution's way of making another spurt forward.
23
The opposition has its role to play in this
world-crisis. Even while obeying its own evil nature, it is frightening half of
mankind with its menaces and undermining their confidence in keeping alive for a
reasonable period.
24
These are the forces which foment hatred and
disrupt society, which deny truth and garble fact.
25
We are victims of a civilization which does not
know where it is going, trivial in purpose and corrupt in character.
26
Strife or hate, dissension or violence rears its
fearsome face in every quarter of the globe, like some hydra-headed dinosauric
monster.
27
We dwell in chaos and violence, in a world that
knows no peace without and feels none within.
28
The lunacy which has poured into the political
demagogues and their followings, the pseudo-artists and their audience, has
spread into the religio-mystics and their believers.
29
The evil which is present in the world may show a
new, exaggerated, and deceitful form but in itself is no new thing. On the
contrary, it is an ancient thing. Plato predicted that if one of the gods came
to this earth, he would not be allowed to live. His ethical ideals would be
rejected in practice. His physical presence would be removed in murder.
30
The universal despair which has crept over the
world - a world which has watched the sayings of many years dwindle or disappear
within a year or two, which has found its jobs become daily less secure -
induces people to draw a slender comfort from that hope which is supposed to
spring eternal in the human breast. The hope formulates in the possibility of
hearing that Fortune's wheel will now turn for them. Perchance the fates will
relent tomorrow, relentless though they have been in the past. The old stand-bys
such as religion and a good bank-balance are going or have already gone. Can one
blame them if, in their anxiety, they summon planetary support to allay their
fears.?
31
We are struggling into a finer epoch. But because
we are and have been struggling blindly, the course of events has and had to get
worse before getting better.
32
From one point of view, the atomic bomb has
created wholly new problems. From another point of view, it has only pushed to
the front for urgent dealing quite old ones. Both are correct.
33
The second world war now belongs to the past. Yet
nobody feels that peace has come, everybody fears what the future might bring.
None of us is living happily ever after.
34
Evil men and dangerous forces thrive today as they
did in Nazi days.
35
It is the danger and tragedy of our generation
that just at the time when man's power to injure his fellows has reached its
peak, the religious checks and controls of hurtful propensities have fallen to
their lowest influence.
36
Internal disquiet and external disorder
characterize our times.
37
Inside himself, the Good the True and the
Beautiful may seem to be the governing forces; but outside himself, in the world
of toiling and fighting men, the Bad the False and the Ugly may seem dominant.
38
Mankind has proved itself unworthy to handle
powers of atomic destructiveness and unable to manage its affairs without
stupidity or its relations without evil-doing.
39
Life today is filled with too many cares or
uncertainties for anyone in any part of the world to enjoy complete happiness.
40
Although our practical duty involves resistance to
evil, it should be clear that such resistance is itself an evil, but it is the
lesser of two evils and a necessary result of the imperfect side of human nature
today. It plays the same part in each individual's life that a police force
plays in the social life. The presence of the policeman is an indication of the
presence of the criminal. With the development of human character, criminal
tendencies would disappear and with them police forces. But we cannot anticipate
that time so far as the immediate present is concerned, although we ought to
deal with the crime in the most enlightened way possible.
41
The malevolent energies and destructive forces
which have been abroad in our time tell us how strong is the evil that lies
mixed with the good in humanity's heart.
42
He need not have a low opinion of the human race
to conclude that there is sufficient evil in it - whether petty or serious - to
make a sloppy sentimental idealization of its character just silly and perilous.
43
The upsurge of interest in Eastern religion and
Western cults is welcome, and may help a turn to the Good; but it has its
negative side in a matching interest in Evil with a capital E.
44
These evils, sufferings, and calamities exist for
all, the good and the bad; such is the human lot.
45
Whether in politics or in society, there is
widespread double-talk, publicly upheld untruth, and differing views expressed.
46
Boehme's illumination opened his eyes to the depth
and extent of the evil in man. He became very sad over it. Today nobody needs to
become illumined in order to see the same thing.
47
If some men wish to withdraw from the world,
disgusted with its repeated brutalities and malignancies, need we wonder?
48
Because the universe is a manifestation of the
Divine, it must be divinely guided. Therefore its history must be divinely
controlled. What has happened in human world affairs so recently and so
dramatically is not outside the divine will. What is happening today is just as
much inside it.
49
The degenerative process which replaced the
universal-mindedness of Goethe by the fanatic narrowness of Goebbels, the calm
wisdom of the earlier man by the obscene insanity of the later one, is a subject
for reflection.
50
The good and the evil in man are such
long-associated partners that co-operation of the good alone between men is
impossible. At some point of their contact, in some way, the reptilian evil will
creep in and make its unpleasant discordant presence felt. Hence universal
brotherhood is only a beautiful dream, to be shattered upon awakening to the
ugly facts.
51
The lives of so many good men in our time have
moved inexorably to disaster, like the gloomy story of a Greek tragedy, that the
helpless but friendly onlooker may well wonder where God is.
52
A period so filled with confusion and so rife with
evil, drives thoughtless people to more sensuality and materialism but
thoughtful ones to more aspiration and higher values.
53
The real enemies of mankind today - as in the
recent past - are doctrines which have issued from the womb of hate and greed,
suspicion and violence, and grown only to spread hate and greed, suspicion and
violence. For the inevitable harm of such thinking is as self-destructive as it
is socially destructive.
54
If they could penetrate, by some mystical insight,
the awful horrors and repulsive episodes which mar modern history, they would
find something unimaginably grand, beautiful, and wise behind it all, unseen and
undreamt by the human agents responsible for this misery.
55
It is unjustified escapism. Postwar sensualism is
as much a form of escapism as postwar ashramism.
56
Folly and evil play the most powerful parts on the
contemporary world stage.
57
If we look at the large panorama of twentieth
century history, with its tortures and devastations, its epidemics and
destructions, its famines and depopulations, above all, its menace of horrors
yet to come, we can see how trivial a thing in fate's eyes is personal life, how
unimportant in them is personal emotion. What does fate, God, Nature, care about
the little histories, the little loves, the little griefs of pullulating humans,
who must appear in those same eyes as hardly more noteworthy than pullulating
ants! There are millions - nay, billions - of these men and women who are so
like each other in their basic natures and desires, that it does not make any
difference to the planetary Mind or the protoplasmic Force whether some of them
die or survive, mate or frustrate, are ecstatically happy or dully miserable,
stay perfectly whole or limp hideously maimed.
58
The fact is that the world finds itself today very
nearly spiritually bankrupt.
59
Snobbishness is only misplaced reverence. Any good
that is misplaced easily becomes an evil. The older nations were permeated with
this evil far too much.
60
The world approaches insane chaos and convulsion
at most, perilous conditions at least.
61
The fault lies not only with the criminal but also
with the society which created the conditions which tempted him to enter
criminality.
62
There is such insecurity and instability, so much
demoralization and so much discontent.
63
Are human life and human destiny ruled by mere
chance or by iron law? If by chance, then our race is wholly at the mercy of
evil men, but if by law, then we may hope to see the pattern of ultimate good
eventually show itself in its history as these men and all men are steered back
to righteous courses by suffering and intuition, by revelation and reflection.
64
The fact that human character as a whole seems not
to have improved in our time does not mean that it will fail to improve in the
future. Human virtue is only in its infancy and will one day attain its
maturity. Human goodness in essence is indestructible because the divine soul in
man is indestructible.
65
There is in the very midst of humanity today,
albeit hidden and awaiting its hour of manifestation, that which is the very
opposite of what has already manifested itself through the evil channels. There
is divine pity as against barbarous cruelty, sublime wisdom as against
materialistic ignorance, altruistic service as against aggressive selfishness,
and exalted reverence against hard atheism. There is the recall to a forgotten
God. There is redemptive grace. There is a hand outstretched in mercy to the
worst sinner, and in consolation to the worst sufferer. Those who are mystically
sensitive feel its presence even now, however intermittently.
66
Too many people hold, whether consciously or
unconsciously, the materialistic belief that they are here on earth to satisfy
their material desires only, and that they have no higher responsibility.
67
This is no time for smooth words that hide the
true state of affairs, no time for shallow optimism that screens the precipice
along whose edge we are walking. Humanity passed through the five-year agony of
life-and-death conflict against Nazi attempts at world domination because it
earlier hugged the delusion either that the danger did not exist or that it was
very slight even if it did exist. It cannot afford to repeat that error. The
peril in which it now stands from materialism - whether avowed, open, or
disguised, supported by out-of-date science, or molded from out-of-date religion
- is just as grave in its own way because of its terrifying spiritual and
physical consequences.
68
The materialistic view of man, which would regard
his life-functioning as a set of physical processes only, which would condemn
him to an absolute lack of spiritual awareness, must die or man himself will die
with it.
69
Materialism leads to a faulty interpretation of
historic events and a one-sided interpretation of personal ones.
70
Most of the modern civilizations which are based
on materialism and take no account of the spiritual nature of man are building
towers of Babel which, when they have reached a certain height, will topple
down. The greater the height, the larger the number of broken pieces. The
creativity of these civilizations is illusory; they seem to be productive, but
they are really destructive, for since they do not conform to the World-Idea the
karma they are making must inevitably bring all this about.
71
The gods of quiet virtue and spiritual wisdom have
had fewer votaries than at most other parallel periods of our history, while the
grinning demons of brazen pleasure and materialistic pursuits have been far
busier. Folly holds the field. Despite all the scientific backwardness and
primitive character attributed to them, there was always a place in most of the
civilizations of antiquity - and there still is in the Orient - or the sage or
the prophet. In the West there does not seem to be one for him today - on the
contrary, he is too often met with unjust suspicions and hopeless
misunderstanding and so can do nothing else than crawl into his shell. This
accusing fact that our society has no place for him, sets no importance on him
and perceives no value in him, is of itself enough to damn it for having strayed
so far from its higher purpose. There is something seriously wrong with a
civilization which thinks that the effort to come into Overself-consciousness is
an abnormal and even an insane one.
72
It is a stupid and narrow outlook which equates
the desire for material progress with the pursuit of materialism.
73
We have passed out of the centuries of
superstitious belief in fossilized creeds only to pass into the centuries of
superstitious belief in credalized fossils - such as the materialistic
conception of Man, the crude notion that might can ultimately conquer right, the
ignorant acceptance of a belief in the inferiority of all Oriental knowledge.
74
Whether we take the industrialized machine-ridden
civilization of Europe or that of the United States, in the end they are setting
up the same goals - the creation of a slavery to technology which can only end
in nervous breakdown and physical illness.
75
When a people is concerned only with material
things, and when their desires are wholly confined to them, it is proper to call
them materialists.
76
To regard all material improvements as a move away
from spirituality, to assert that science, and the industries based on it, is
absolutely evil, is unfair and untrue.
77
The grim needs of war pushed technological advance
ahead at an amazing speed. This advance may be used either to make us more
materialistic or to make us less so. In itself it is neutral.
78
There is a line of connection which can be traced
from the appearance of gentle Jesus to the terrors of the Inquisition. There is
another line which can be traced from the work of pioneer scientists like
Galileo and Bacon to the work of atomic scientists like Einstein and
Oppenheimer. If Jesus' gospel was a message from God, science was a different
kind of revelation from God. Both Inquisitional tortures and Hiroshima's horrors
are evidences of what men have done to the fine things entrusted to them. It is
for the men themselves to undo their misdeeds and not wait for a Saviour to do
it. The responsibility is theirs.
79
It was the prevalence of superstition in all
departments of human life, activity, belief, and thought which brought about the
needed counter-culture of the exact sciences. But under the various
superstitions there was not seldom some measure of covert fact and hidden truth.
Science has itself become, because of its one-sided, self-made limitation, and
through refusal to depart from materialistic views, a sort of superstition.
Technical skill, verified experiment, and laboratory research are necessary and
valuable, but their presence ought not to be used as an excuse for abandoning
everything else which ought to be considered. Hence we witness today such evils
as the pollution of nature and the poisoning of human nutriment. There is no
other way out now than to compensate for the missing elements, to broaden
culture in a basic way - a coexistence previously believed to be impossible.
80
Man looked into the mysteries of the atom when he
was too selfish to use it rightly, too ignorant of the higher laws to use it
wisely - that is, when he was unworthy and unready. He is in such danger today
that many regret he ever did so. But he could not help it, could not have done
otherwise. The mind wants to know; this is its essential nature: it was
inevitable that what began as simple childish curiosity should end as rigorous
scientific investigation. Nothing could stop this process in the past. This was
the warning of Greek, European, and American history. It is now the warning of
Chinese, Southeast Asian, and Indian history, where seemingly static
civilizations become more dynamic.
81
When science serves politics only, and both are
unguided by knowledge of the higher laws governing mankind, then both, in this
age of nuclear weapons, put mankind in danger of nuclear annihilation.
82
Where the nineteenth-century Westerner displaced
religion by science, the twentieth-century Westerner is increasingly being
faced, through the unexpected results of nuclear science, with having to refind
interest in religion, recover the truth in religious teaching, and regain the
peace in religious experience.
83
The scientists conceived the atomic bomb, the
heads of government financed it, and the military used it. This was the triple
combination which brought humanity to its present plight. Admittedly, they did
this with the best intentions and under the stress of seeming outer necessity.
But the fact still remains that it was they who created the danger for all of us
and it is they who now seem unable to free us from it.
84
It is necessary for man to be reminded of his
comparative nothingness when his intellect swells into dangerous arrogance. With
the triumphs of atomic research and the gadgets of mechanical civilization, he
has reached such a point. He will not have to wait long to see that the failure
to balance them with moral and spiritual advance will bring its own punishment.
85
The scientist who foresees a happy abundant future
for mankind (because of technological advance) while so many of his colleagues
are preparing the weapons to wipe out the species itself, is either insane or
incapable of non-specialized thinking.
86
If the scientific gropers-in-the-dark were allowed
fully to explore, and their political masters to exploit, the atom until all its
energy were released, our Earth would either blow up into pieces and all mankind
with it, or else have its atmosphere so poisoned by radioactivity as to make any
life within it impossible. But it is not in the World-Mind's World-Idea that
this shall be allowed. The so-called progress of man in this direction will be
arrested. He will be allowed to injure himself, since he insists on playing with
these dangerous forces, but not to destroy himself.
87
This one event has dominated the intelligent human
mind in the mid-twentieth century more than any other. This release of the
atom's energy has forced a rethinking of the human position in politics,
society, health, and economics.
88
The social, economic, and political problems which
have developed with the development of science, and its use in industry, have
reached their ultimate in the hydrogen bomb. This is the Frankenstein monster
which will destroy its master, if he does not soon renounce all nuclear weapons.
89
The worth to mankind of an invention or a
discovery depends on the uses made of it. If these are warlike and destructive
to an appalling degree, then it might have been better for mankind to have
continued in ignorance.
90
The world has moved too far from the quest of
religious values to the quest of earthly ones; it is passing too quickly from
faith in the myth to faith in the machine.
91
Many have been forced to stop and think about the
failure of science to improve man despite its success in improving his tools.
For the nineteenth-century naïveté about "progress" which had believed one would
inevitably lead to the other, has been exposed for the foolish thing it is.
92
Progression forwards, which is what we have
witnessed in this scientific age, is not the same as progress.
93
The end of all one-sided growth is usually
catastrophic. This is true of the outer world of science as of the inner world
of man himself. If the wonderful achievements of the scientist in controlling
physical energies have now become highly dangerous to man, this is simply
because they are unbalanced by equal knowledge of his own nature and equal
achievement in controlling it.
94
The greater the pressure produced by this machine
age, the greater is the revolt against it. Foolish materialists call this revolt
escapism. Whether it appears as a turning to the arts or to mysticism, it is the
cry of the human soul seeking to remember again that it is a soul.
95
If every invention which has benefited the human
species has also introduced evils or disadvantages not present before, too often
that has been due to human misuse or greed, materialism or ignorance.
96
I know there is some belief that not only has
human capacity been extended by modern scientific knowledge but also that human
character has been improved by modern civilization and culture. I doubt that
this is so.
97
As modern technological civilization increased in
power, the size of its problems increased too.
98
Even without a war the mere belief that they have
to go on improving their nuclear knowledge by experiments and nuclear weapons by
tests is leading to a disastrous result - the poisoning of the entire human race
and the damaging of its organs, or its children's organs, and the deforming of
its next generations.
99
Of what use are all these vaunted conquests over
Nature if they are all to be lost again in a vast man-made calamity?
100
Control of mind by electronic machines is being
actively sought by researchers without conscience, devoid of ethics, sorcerers
using twentieth-century science.
101
Man's success in using his knowledge of the
working of the external world can come only if it is linked with the knowledge
of the working of his own psycho-physical mechanism and function. For if the
first leads him into self-destruction, as it is now doing, the second can
control and safeguard him against such an ill destiny.
102
To believe that the old past was quite barbaric,
that the new present is quite civilized, as do those who pin all their faith to
the "progress" brought about by science, shows definite ignorance of the past
and lack of insight into the present. Moreover it also shows a dangerous lack of
humility, dangerous because the first need of humanity is to be humble, is to
confess its failure and admit its weakness.
103
Technological triumph, if held in equilibrium by
spiritual intuition, can lead to a glorious civilization, but without such
intuition, it can lead to mankind's destruction.
104
It is not enough for our civilization to express
the discoveries arising out of scientific knowledge. It must also express the
ethics arising out of spiritual knowledge.
105
The forces of evil which are unloosed upon the
world attain their maximum potency with the attainment of maximum hatred. Hence
revolution based on hatred is not foolish; it is criminal.
106
Movements or men spreading hate or promoting
violence to achieve a religious, political, or social aim fall into an ancient
error - that the release of evil passions can increase and not hurt the general
welfare.
107
I prefer evolution to revolution in political
affairs. All revolutions are born of violence, hatred, and assassination whilst
the attempt to establish and maintain them leads to oppression and despotism
until their karma is exhausted. Evolution moves more slowly but also moves more
peacefully, more bloodlessly.
108
Those who seek reform are too often too
impatient: so they resort to revolution or violence. The price then may be
exceedingly heavy. Even where the reform has been successfully brought about by
such means, the success was due chiefly to other factors.
109
The vengeful hate-filled hysteria with which
black leaders, leftist revolutionaries, and political fanatics try to arouse
their young followers can only destroy them spiritually.
110
Agitators work up passions and hatreds and lead
mobs to commit violent acts. It is thus that the first Alexandrian Library in
ancient Egypt was destroyed.
111
Those youngsters who call hysterically for
proletarian revolution, fill their minds with hate at the same time. This is as
destructive to themselves as it is hurtful to others. If social injustices are
repaired in the wrong spirit, new injustices replace the old ones. "Seek ye
first the Kingdom of Heaven, and all these things shall be added unto you." That
is, seek first the revolution in man himself, and then your quest of
social justice will be aided by higher forces.
112
Those who demand liberty in order to destroy
liberty itself are often in the noisy minority which claims that any attempt to
protect liberty is an attack on "civil liberties"!
113
If those who denounce the world so strongly
would then go on to renounce it, their attacks would be more convincing. The
fact that most of them continue to stay in it, to live among all its evils (and
attractions), is sufficient answer to their criticisms.
114
The mistake is to be so affected by the evils as
not to see the good, so eager to destroy what is wrong that the right is
destroyed along with it.
115
They are not evil in the fundamental sense of
the word, all these men who commit crimes to further what they believe to be a
righteous cause: they are mistaken.
116
It is significant that Communist leaders like
Lenin despised all schools of spiritual thought, denounced religion, and scorned
metaphysical reflection. This is now the nominal inheritance of half the world,
most particularly the so-called workers' class.
117
If social justice means that every man, however
deprived his background, should have a chance to develop himself and to better
his standards of living, then it is certainly a good thing. But if it means the
forced regimentation of everyone, the compulsory equalization of everything, the
denial of individuality and the destruction of freedom, then it is surely a bad
thing.
118
If we only pause to consider that half the
entire human race has fallen under the enforced leadership and tyrannical
domination of those who would limit man to his ego and reality to matter, we may
see how urgently necessary is an arrest to this downward trend. The world is in
a state of spiritual crisis.
119
Where the physical body is cherished as the sole
reality and made the sole basis for social and political reform, where
hate-driven men advocate physical violence as the sole means of effecting
progress, be sure of the presence of evil forces, dangers to society, ignorant
opponents of truth, and enemies of the Light.(P)
120
It is very meaningful that the filthy abuse
which Lenin put into his writings against the idealist metaphysicians like
Berkeley is no longer able to detain Soviet psychologists and philosophers in
the utter blindness which he left them as part of his spiritual legacy. More and
more they begin to question the nature of consciousness as well as its
relationship to the external world, more and more they investigate borderland
experiences like telepathy and hypnotism. On the question of consciousness'
relationship to the brain they are now arguing quite widely, but, for obvious
reasons, they remain unable to come to definitive conclusions on which all could
agree. They are not satisfied with the completely materialistic answer and yet
dare not venture into the purely mentalistic one. Meanwhile they go on debating,
and so long as this continues, it is spiritually much healthier than their state
of thirty years ago. Problems are being stated and solutions are being
discussed. If the Leninist inheritance overshadows it all, that cannot be helped
in a totalitarian Communist country. At the present stage of history the truth
must be left out in such a land, but it cannot be left out forever. Out of all
their mental and verbal activity, the Russians will have to draw a little nearer
to it intellectually. What is happening on a deeper plane is outside their
knowledge.
121
No materialistic organization of society can
prevent the appearance and development of spirituality in the individual, but it
can create the conditions which will obstruct the appearance or hinder the
development of spirituality.
122
The intellect, uncontrolled by intuition and
unguided by revelation, has spawned the two great masters of our time - Science
holding the atom bomb and Communism holding revolution. Science, which in the
last century promised so much, gave us the terrible problem of atomic war
instead. Its ardent advocates pointed at it only yesterday as the road to our
salvation. Today it has become the road to our destruction. This is not to say
that it was a false light, but that we mistook its proper place and claimed too
much for its human possibilities. We let it run away with us and with our
religion. We lost ourselves and our bearings. It made us regard Nature as
self-operative in a solely mechanical way. It left life on earth without
spiritual meaning, without moral purpose. Communism is the other
heaven-promising panacea which has helped to make this earth a little hell.
There can be no worthwhile future for humanity if it accepts the leadership of
men, such as Communists, who regard conscience as a disease. The Communist
insensibility in practice to human suffering accords ill with its vaunted
idealism in theory. Communism's twisted ethic of wild hatred, its hard cruel
face, its blind slavish obedience to a brutal organization which cares more for
itself than for the workers it was supposed to save, its insane preachments
against religion and denial of life beyond matter, have brought enough suffering
to make its claims sound absurdly exaggerated. But the intellectual movement
which produced Science and the social movement which produced Communism will not
continue unchecked. They are approaching the utmost limit possible. The violent
materialism for which they are responsible will culminate in the next
Armageddon, which will not only end them, but also end the epoch itself.
123
Excerpt from an article in a Czech magazine on
contemporary Czech literature: "Those ideals which were formerly given to the
world by prophets of religion, headed by Jesus the Nazarene, are now practically
applied by scientific socialists beginning with Karl Marx." Such is the
plausible self-deception into which so many intellectuals have fallen. This
quotation shows a grave lack of understanding of religion, of the prophets, and
especially of Jesus. The distance between the Nazarene and the author of the
first Communist Manifesto is not merely horizontal, it is vertical. The two men
stand on different levels, belong to different worlds.
124
The presence of hatred as one of its animating
ingredients is a moral disadvantage to any social movement. This is one reason
why modern Communism is built on an unsure foundation.
125
The organized politico-economic substitutes for
organized religion have hardly proved any better when put into active life
rather than mere theory. They have introduced much hate, misery, oppression,
persecution, superstition, and war, like the other.
126
In connection with the Cultural Revolution of
the 1960s, Mao Tse-tung wrote that the working classes would from then on take
over leadership in all activities. That is to say, the least fitted by natural
mental development, experience, and acquired education would dictate what was to
be taught in philosophical and similar reflections about life, man, and history,
if indeed such subjects would not be dropped altogether as unpractical, hence
useless. The Peking Institute of Philosophy, a leading one in China, stopped
publishing its journal Philosophical Research in 1966.
127
The fundamental mistake which is responsible for
the harm and evil and misery caused when these teachings of economic equality
are put into harsh practice, is to do so in separation from the teachings
concerning man's spiritual life and spiritual needs. If the two were joined
together then the fanaticism, delusion, and brutality of such practice would
eliminate itself.
128
It is inevitable that a group which espouses
belief in atheistic materialism will also espouse belief in the use of force and
violence to establish itself and its views. If there will be no peace, it is
because they do not really want it.
129
The most frenzied exponents of materialistic
values today are those who have developed enough intellect to lose their faith
in the hypocrisies of conventional religion but who have lost their true
intuition along with their false belief. Such are the leaders and advocates of
communism everywhere. Thus the good in their development is offset by the evil.
The result is spiritual chaos and social turmoil for the masses who follow them.
Since both the religious and their rebels have contributed to this situation,
there is no remedy save in a clearer insight on the part of both.
130
It is impossible to reconcile the criminal
ethics and materialistic ideology of Communism with the lofty ethics and
mystical ideology of philosophy. There is no communication and every disparity
between them.
131
The itch to meddle in other people's affairs and
to mind their business for them is an ancient one. It was rightly reprimanded by
the Bhagavad Gita in India and by the Tao Teh Ching in China. It
reaches its extreme degree in tyrannies like the German Nazi and the Russian
Communist, where state interference in the people's lives, culture, religion,
and freedom becomes intolerable.
132
The Evil Spectre of Communism (Essay)
Abundant living will belong to the twenty-first rather than the twentieth
century. Years must pass before even Europe alone can restore its shattered
economy. For a number of years there will be immense and tragic shortages of
food, clothing, and other necessities. The era of abundance is, therefore, not
an immediate possibility. The postwar years are necessarily filled with
privation for many millions of people.
Now this may be done and these problems may be solved by peaceful discussions and mutual agreement, which is the philosophic way, or by bitter strife and physical violence, which has been the common way. The first seeks the general welfare whereas the second seeks a partisan victory. The advantages of the philosophic way of speeded up evolutionary change are manifold in the economic sphere. The afflicted world's need is not more hatred but less, not more warfare but more co-operation. Philosophy is opposed to all doctrines of class hatred. It believes that the situation today requires an integral multi-class outlook. Its opposition to the old-fashioned materialistic propaganda for abrupt social change is not to its egalitarian aims but to the preaching of hatred as a personal ethic and the advocacy of violence as an instrument of attainment. For both hatred and violence are the voices of the beast in man. An age sickened by the horrors of scientific warfare ought not need to witness the furture horrors of scientific revolution. But it is hard to persuade them that reconstruction is a saner and safer path to take than revolutio, the ballot-box wiser than bloodshed, and that our duty is not to imitate the terrorists but to build peacefully a better order suited to sensible kindly and decent human beings. It cannot accept hatred as an inspiration to social betterment. For it knows that we cannot gather grapes off thistles nor human happiness off the tree of hatred. The history of mankind has shown what psychology always knew, that the hater will start looking for new human objects of his hatred, new enemies, as soon as the existing ones have been, in his horrible modern terminology, "liquidated." The ugly passion of hatred, having been developed and nurtured, will still exist and still seek an outlet as soon as it can persuade the mind to interpret conditions in its favour.
This is why the Buddha said: "Hatred ceaseth not by hatred. It ceaseth by compassion." If philosophy advocates the peaceful way of quickened evolution and dynamic progressivism as against the violent way of abrupt revolution, it is because it knows that the moral evils which are introduced by brutality - not to speak of the physical ones which inevitably follow from it - constitute too high a price for the benefits received. For if the latter tend to disappear, the former tend to become stabilized. A great social change which stimulated hatred, passion, selfishness, and materialism would negate the ultimate purpose which lies behind all social evolution - the spiritualization of human character. A better society, to be based on goodwill and co-operation, cannot be reached by arousing hatred and selfishness. The defense that ends justify means is a self-deceptive one. It is for the votaries of philosophy to follow the right path and to abstain from brutal or bloody methods, especially as we know that whilst conditions create them, there will always be others who are naturally inclined towards the transplanted barbarism of Communism.
Russia is today the homeland of Communism. Her achievements, sacrifices, and struggles during World War II, unexpected as they were and so valuable in giving other nations a respite of time to eliminate their own unpreparedness for the Nazi aggressions, forcibly brought Russia's thought and fate to the whole world's attention. By reason of her exceptional geographical position, with one foot in Europe and another in Asia, Russia would have been a suitable mediator between the cultures of both continents and an especially suitable interpreter of Asiatic wisdom to European minds, had she not been formerly so cut off from the rest of Europe by her intellectual and industrial backwardness, her difficult language and her deliberate exclusion of foreigners. The course of recent history, and especially wartime history, delusively appeared to be bringing these hindrances to an end. Given entirely different leadership, there might have been within the Slavonic republic the impending gestation of new spiritual-practice culture, of a spiritually aspiring economic order. Russia and Germany constitute the two largest national populations in Europe. If the old Slav mysticism and the vanished German idealism could have been reincarnated in new non-materialistic, uncorrupt, and undistorted forms, there would have been hope for Europe. But the criminal leadership which existed actually destroyed this chance. This was all the more regrettable because, before the revolution of 1917, the Russians were particularly reputed to be a religious and mystical people whilst their literature was known to reflect these attributes. However, the explanation is easy. Russia was then a land of peasant communities with very few towns. Because their daily work keeps them in constant touch with nature, the peasant classes everywhere in the world have more religious emotion and mystical feeling than the others. But because they are also the most illiterate, the least educated, the most economically depressed an least travelled of all classes, their religion is more virulently intolerant and stupidly superstitious and their mysticism more medievally anti-rational and emotionally unbalanced than are those of other classes. All these undesirable features were prominent in pre-revolutionary Russia. The type of mysticism which can best flourish today and best meet the modern need can arise and develop only in more advanced countries, where the agricultural and industrial classes are more evenly distributed.
What is happening inside the Russian soul must interest us because it is important to us. The direction taken there is deciding the fate of other peoples as well as that of the Russians. They are a remarkable people, a bridge between Asia and Europe, and it would have been fitting that out of their tremendous sufferings and sacrifices there should emerge a happier country. Everything had depended on how far the Russians could overcome their greatest defect - fanatical lack of balance. Had they done this quickly enough, they could have risen to the grand height of a spiritual-material civilization. But, because they failed, because they listened too long to the evil voice of Communism, we have the danger of a third world war.
We should feel sorry for the Russian masses, who are blind dupes of their leaders, where the real evil resides. The inspiration of Russian leadership has been brutal hatred and camouflaged materialism, as well as the selfish preservation of their own power. But the law of compensation makes the masses responsible for their surrender and obedience to such criminal leadership. Their years of sacrifice in blood and comfort profit them nothing. They are sacrifices made in an evil cause. Those whose whole attitude is quarrelsome and carping and hating and irresponsible can contribute only unscrupulous criticism and hysterical destruction towards life. They are eager to obstruct and even destroy, but never to create, to co-operate, or to build. The Communist leaders, as distinct from their blind dupes, are the poisonous scorpions of society.
Their fanatic hostility to all spiritual enlightenment is inspired by the same dark forces that inspired the fanatic hostility of Nazism. The second world war was the epochal struggle between the unseen powers of evil working through mesmerized Germans and barbarized Japanese and the unseen powers of good instilling ideals of decency into other peoples. This inner war between good and evil goes on at all times; the military world war was but a dramatic outward representation of it. That - the real war - is not ended. We must beware of those who never went to Germany and never wore a swastika on a brown shirt, but who nevertheless imbibed the Nazi spirit and wore the swastika in their hearts. They have reappeared in Russia. Those unseen spirits which animated, prompted, and inspired the Nazi leaders are now performing the same office for the Communist leaders. It would have been better for Europe if the Communists and their twins, the Nazis with their slippery morality, had never existed. It is an unendurable thought; nevertheless, the truth must be faced that we shall have peace only by having war. The dangers to which humanity was exposed did not all vanish with the Nazis' defeat. Those unseen powers still exist. What they could not achieve through a straightforward conflict, they will desperately try to achieve through a confused one. This indeed is the next phase of experience through which we are about to pass and which we shall have to endure.
Nevertheless the presence of an evil tyranny in both Russia and Germany ought not to blind us to the vital difference between their forms of government. In Russia, Stalin's dictatorial control was expounded and accepted theoretically as a purely temporary measure on the road to full democratic freedom, whereas in Germany Hitler's dictatorial control was expounded and accepted as an ultimate ideal in itself. The dangers to which Nazism exposed the human race were immeasurably larger than those to which Communism exposes it. For no matter how brutal, how violent, and how materialistic Communism became, it always remained in theory an anguished and desperate attempt - however ugly in form - to win justice for the underprivileged and to compel the social whole to accept responsibility for their unavoidable sufferings. But the ultimate trend of the Nazification of Europe could only be the animalization of Europeans. All that gives dignity and worth to human beings, all their ethics and rationality, all their art and idealism would have disappeared under Nazi reign within a generation or two. The disfigured form of man would thenceforth bear a close resemblance to the worst kind of beast, albeit a cunning one, whose God was Hatred. If we must compare the two evil systems, Bolshevism had this superiority at most, that it arose under the inspiration of great hope, whereas Nazism arose under that of great despair and revenge.
But alas, just as the arising of Nazism earlier forced the world unwillingly into a struggle to the death, so the leaders of Communism are now forcing the world into the same kind of struggle. The human race is being made to chalk out a boundary line and to take sides in preparation for the inevitable.
The responsibility for this degeneration does not lie with those who still believe in the ideals of freedom and truth, but with those who reject these ideals. The guilt does not lie with those who seek to defend themselves against the aggressions of an evil doctrine, it lies with those who spread this doctrine by every means, including the most criminal means.
It is better, indeed, that the face of Communism should be seen for what it is, with all its malignant cruelty and materialistic criminality, than that the world should continue in complacent blindness to the danger in which it stands. Ever since the war ended we have tried to make peace or effect compromises with this dark force, but to no avail. It does not want peace because it does not believe in peace. It is committed to the doctrine that it must fight for the soul of humanity - which soul it seeks to enslave for its own evil purposes.
The frightful shape which the next war would necessarily take may make us wonder whether it would be better for humanity to save its body at least, by appeasing the powers of evil or by surrendering to them. But is it only for the body's sake that we are upon this earth? If there were no higher purpose to life than preserving the body, such appeasement and such surrender might be worthwhile. But we know that there is such a purpose, that we are here for soul development even more than for any other kind. If appeasement and surrender are the only price at which we can purchase peace, then the still small voice within answers, "War is still better - even if costlier."
The effort is one thing, whilst its effect is another. We must estimate the Bolshevik achievement by its practical results rather than by its theoretical claims. We must keep close to earth in these matters and test the printed page by the human scene. And if we do this without paying uncritical homage to the dynamism it has shown, we find that Bolshevism has dragged men's souls in mire and their bodies in prison - for Russia became nothing else - and the economic lot of the peasant and the workman is no better, and generally is far worse, than it is in most capitalistic countries. Russia suffered the painful consequences of her own barbarities and fanaticisms, and she has pruned her communistic ideas of some of their extremism. She found by experience that it was an error to withdraw the profit motive entirely. Human nature being psychologically what it is, sufficient financial inducement had to be given to evolve personal efficiency and enterprise and to encourage new inventions. She found that any economic order which ignored the inequalities of capacity and qualifications, talents and minds among its members, could only be a half-success and must be a half-failure. Men require the energizing motive of more pay for more work or higher pay for higher type of work. Men must have rewards for extra labour or extra talent, which means they must own possessions and get privileges in unequal degrees. Any economic scheme must frankly face and accept this psychological fact, otherwise it would set up a perpetual friction between the individual and the state. Russian Communism was compelled, by initial failures in obtaining adequate production, to give more remuneration to skilled workers and to institute hierarchic organization in factories. Moreover the ever-present need of stimulating general human evolution requires the offering of rewards to draw out the varied possibilities lying latent within man, the holding-up of baits to make him re alize the fuller stature of his being.
The crude kind of socialism which would erect the state into a tyrannous dictator, create an order of bureaucratic parasites, and organize every detail of the mental and physical existence of its unfortunate victims, is intolerable to intelligent people who rightly wish to exercise their personal initiative, to develop their creative abilities, to attain self-responsibility, to achieve economic independence, and to think for themselves. Only those who possess slave-mentalities can fail to be opposed by temperament to any totalitarian form which would compel every man to walk in standardized step with all other men, which would dictate how he should think, live, talk, work, rest, and marry, and which would reduce all society to a dead monotony of uniformity. Such a system is the kind which can suit only a people which has made materialism its religion. On the other hand, a system which would allow room for diverse forms of living, which would encourage and not stifle individual initiative, and which would lead men to liberation and not to enslavement is the kind which is based on the right comprehension of existence. Man cannot live by Marxism alone. A system which deprived its citizens of their personal initiative and individual enterprise would thereby deprive society of valuable gifts. The delight of creative self-expression and personal initiative ought to be encouraged and not chilled, as it is under Communism. It is better for a man - and consequently for the nation - that he should farm his own little piece of land in economic and individual freedom than that he should be a mere labouring "hand" under State employ on a mammoth agricultural enterprise. The notion that slavery becomes innocuous when it is slavery under a bureaucratic State instead of under a particular master is a notion to be repudiated. The worthwhile values which have been so far derived from a free system should not be sacrificed, even though the system itself may have to be brought up-to-date. It must defend itself against the hard dogmas which would destroy individuality. Nobody who loves liberty can be happy if he is numbered, regimented, dragged about, and enslaved by a cold, unfeeling, abstract entity called the State. The intellectual mistake of destroying personal freedom in order to achieve the ends, alone renders Communism unacceptable to the philosophic mind. The emotional mistake of effecting such destruction violently and brutally renders it still more unacceptable.
He who loves freedom to follow a spiritual path and values independence of mental outlook will not care to be rigorously controlled at every step of his work and for every hour of his intellectual life by any bureaucratic regime. When, for instance, writers, artists, and clergymen have to serve the State first and truth, beauty, or God afterwards, they can do so only at the cost of forfeiting the authentic inspiration which these ideals provide. They must be free or the community will get not their best but their worst work. The extinction of intellectual and spiritual liberty, the destruction of personal self-respect, and the disregard of the sacredness of individual life are definite evils. Philosophy is opposed to totalitarianism in all its forms because it believes in the necessity of preserving human dignity, human freedom, and human individuality, within proper limits. Unless there is respect for such aspirations, spiritual growth will be hampered. To a totalitarian order, things are more important than men, frontiers than the people behind them, and the State than its citizens. But to a true philosophy, men in their final essence are creatures with divine possibilities, human dignity is sacred, inviolable, and human individuality is to be sacrificed only at God's behest. This development is one of the last things that a totalitarian state can wish or permit. Therefore, the practice of true religion, mysticism, and philosophy, which leads to the development of man's spiritual individuality, could only end in collision between the seeker and such a state. Consequently, the latter could afford to sanction the existence only of a false, nationalistic, materialistic, pseudo-spiritual teaching or, in the end, prohibit it altogether. Fatalism has crept into economic thinking in the most vicious and distorted form, the form of Communism. According to this doctrine, history's course is predetermined: the capitalistic phase of society cannot avoid being followed by the chaotic phase of its own dissolution, and that, in its turn, cannot avoid being followed by the Communistic form of a rigid reorganization. This is a materialistic caricature of the doctrine of fatalism, which in its true form as karma has so far entered only into the spiritual thinking of the West. This Marxian view, that is to say, the short-sighted view, is too simple to be true. Life is more complex than that. It is true that Demos is astir and seeks at the least to better his lot and at the most a paradise on earth. When a man passes through a long period of unemployment or earns too little for adequate support of his family, he begins to feel despairingly that society has no use for him. This bitterness weakens his ethical sense and renders him liable to fall into the illusion that any social change, even a violent one, is necessarily a change for the better. If, instead of making proper efforts to remove the deficiencies and elimina te shortcomings, we merely seek for plausible pretexts to justify them, then we ought not to be astonished when disaster comes. Those who feel that economic reform is the most urgent duty facing humanity have usually opposed the mystical movement. They have done so on the grounds that it diverts attention from the real (that is, the economic) issues, that it enfeebles the urge towards social improvement and individual ambition, and that it leads to sleepy, dreamy complacency. Karl Marx's criticism of religion, that it had become a mere appendix of bourgeois thought, had some truth in it for his own times. But today many religious leaders have been aroused to the danger and are sincerely striving to bring the social order into line with religious ethics. They are no longer falsifying religious ethics by striving to bring them into line with the social order.
Yet the solution Communists offer is philosophically unsatisfactory for it is born out of crude materialism, based on venomous class hatred, and stiffened by bureaucratic tyranny. Their ultimate aim, however, is a good one only insofar as it is the elimination of capitalism's defects, such as avoidable unemployment, extreme poverty, and social injustices, but their means and methods are very bad. There is only one real capitalist - Nature - one real proprietor of the earth and all that therein is, and consequently all the children of earth are its rightful heirs. We usually forget that we have no ethical right to possess what we have not toiled for. This is overlooked by society as a whole and we, as individuals, take shelter beneath the common sin. For sin it is, albeit only one of omission. Those, however, who have cast aside the conventional view can see it for what it is. That which this earth produces is for all. Every man has his birthright in what it stores or gives forth, a lthough not an equal birthright to every other man's. This, surely, is Nature's view, although man in his ignorance has developed other ideas upon the matter and so brought great misery upon his fellows and great nemesis upon himself. The world is for our temporary use and does not constitute our eternal property. Whoever thinks otherwise - whether it be a single individual or a community of individuals called a "nation" - and excludes all others from consideration, whoever thinks he has a full right to eat whilst others have a full right to starve, whoever cannot identify himself with the suffering people of his own or another country, will be tutored by pain and instructed by loss. We are all stewards, not proprietors, and own nothing in reality. This was pithily expressed by a highly advanced Indian mystic of well-deserved repute. He was the Jain Mahatma Shantivijaya who lived on Mount Abu until he died during the War. When one of his devotees, a rich l andlord, came to him and complained of having been robbed of some jewels, the yogi observed, "Perhaps Nature regards you also as a thief. Perhaps she thinks you have no more right to appropriate such a large piece of land than you think the other man has to your jewels?" The same idea was beautifully expressed in a verse by my revered Irish friend, the late A.E.: "How would they think on, with what shame, all that fierce talk of thine and mine, if the true Master made His claim, the World He fashioned so divine. What could they answer did He say, 'When did I give my world away?' "
But there is a great distance from such abstract reflections to the concrete realities of contemporary social and economic life. The whole structure of laws and rights is based on these realities. And this is as it should be, for humanity, at its present stage of evolution, can best express itself and serve itself in that way. The anarchist would ignore them because he is one-sided and the Communist would violate them because he is unscrupulous. Philosophy does not object to any effort to remold society for the common welfare, but welcomes it.
No amount of academic sophistry can justify a system which permits the few to have more food than they can eat and forces the many to have less food than they need to eat. No amount of legal enactment can justify the ownership of a hundred thousand acres of land merely because five hundred years earlier some ancestor seized it. These ancient wrongs must be redressed. Both altruistic sentiment and political strategy - no less than karmic adjustment - demand such a revision, although the attempt to do so by violent means would introduce far worse wrongs.
In this momentous task, we have to prepare a blueprint - not of the ideal State which we would like to see arise, but of the actual State which can arise under the given circumstances. This means that we must follow a middle path. Any other way will be either too realistic or too idealistic and will lead to failure. For we must find not only what is theoretically right but also what is practically possible.
We cannot and we ought not do away wildly, abruptly, and violently with our social environment. Without it we would be savages. Those vanished men of the past had to learn arduously how to live on earth, how to adapt themselves to it. Think of what it would mean to be born into a world where no houses existed, no land was cultivated, no roads had been cut, no books were available, no shops could be found, no tools had been made, no machines invented, no knowledge and no art were known! All these and infinitely more exist today and constitute our surroundings, our civilization; but they did not spring up in a single night. They are the inheritance which we owe to a long trailing line of Egyptian, Asiatic, and European ancestors living and working and dying for countless centuries. They are our own racial past. We cannot dismiss this legacy without descending anew to the most barbarous existence. There are grave defects in this environment, it is true, but the young rebel who wishes to tear ever ything down in order to remove these defects, will also remove treasures bought at a price which will take the toil of millions through centuries to pay again. The past efforts of man appear in our present environment. Let us use it, but use it wisely. It is here to serve us. We need not be afraid to improve and alter it. Unbalanced hot-heads who say that such improvement and such alteration is only possible through complete destruction of what is the present order so that what may be shall rise on its ruins, have misread history.
But there is a right as well as a wrong way of doing this. The only proper way is by persuasion, by the persuasion and education of social conscience and by the uplift of social morality to loftier standards. Such reforms can be brought about only in an atmosphere of goodwill and calmness, not in an atmosphere of hatred and brutality. Man must choose which God he will serve, the God of hatred or the God of love, for he cannot serve both. He must effect these changes not by brutality or by blood, but by the gentler persuasions of reason and goodwill, slower though they necessarily are. Wisdom prefers to see needed reforms and overdue changes brought in by peaceful and not violent means, by the acknowledgment of their ethical need rather than by submission to materialistic values.
Orthodox Communism is a typical nineteenth-century product. The doctrine arose out of a completely materialistic view of history. It was formulated in an age when the mechanistic conception of life had captured the thinking world. It led naturally to an ethic of hatred and violence. It excluded all consideration of the higher destiny of men. Consequently it is emotionally unbalanced and intellectually unsatisfactory. The evil lies less in the doctrine itself, which is a confused mixture of nonsense and wisdom, of justice and crime, than in its human leaders. They are men without a conscience and maniacs entrenched in the seats of power. They trade on this confusion of doctrine to suborn the masses who lack the capacity to understand the inner source of Communism and its inability to redeem its promises. They achieve for themselves positions of power because they mercilessly push aside and trample all who are hapless enough to stand in their way.
He who thinks in terms of class hatred and class murder reveals himself as being naturally neurotic or malignant. As such he is unfit to lead people into a better condition than before and can only lead them into a worse one. The average Communist is unfit to lead a people or govern a nation. He is an extraordinary compound of keen critical thinking and irrational obsessions and class prejudices; consequently his thinking is distorted and unbalanced. He lives in a private Marxist world of his own, which he stupidly imagines to be a real world. But the greatest defect in himself and the greatest danger to others is the powerful hatred which actuates him and which has made him in fact a pathological case. He has become semi-insane because he cannot escape from it.
Both the Nazi and Bolshevik revolutions failed to bring a better society, a happier healthier and more honourable world for the underdog, because they failed to recognize that the only way this could be achieved was by leaders of disinterested character and superior quality descending to the service of the lower classes. The reconstruction of the world's social and economic order cannot succeed if it comes from the mentally ungrown and ethically immature masses themselves. This has been clearly demonstrated by the melancholy history and comparative failure of the brutal Russian and German attempts. It could not be achieved by leaders of inferior character and merit rising from the ranks of the masses. The right way of social-economic progress is from the top downwards and not from the bottom upwards. The fruits of wisdom cannot come from below. But this does not mean they come from the aristocracy of blood; they can come only from aristocracy of mind and character. The masses will be best serv ed by the man who disdains their approbation and waves aside their applause. For intellectual awakening of a people does not begin as an awakening of the masses; it begins as an awakening of the educated classes and proceeds downwards to the people. The masses must naturally follow more intelligent leaders, assimilate the ideas which are earlier embraced by their betters but which are gradually filtered down and thus rendered more acceptable. For it is not the ignorant blind toilers who can perceive the crowning principle of right reconstruction; they can perceive only their immediate needs, not their ultimate ones. Therefore the creation of a new order must not come from below but from above. It must come from the intellectual cream, the spiritual elite of society - from those who can reflect philosophically and serve selflessly and act calmly. They stand on the mountain peak, as it were, and see clearly what ought to be done whereas the masses ar e herded on the plains and can only run hither or thither as their emotions drive them.
The Communists cannot be regarded as sane, normal people; they are mentally in a psychopathic condition. Consequently they leave themselves open to submoral influences, and that they fully absorb these influences we may judge from the fact that they do indeed come to believe that the end justifies any means, however evil. It is a sophistry common alike to criminal gangsters and to totalitarian dictators that the sacrifice of ethical restraints and the aggressive use of brutal methods are quite justified by the achievement of success in their aims. Such callous belief, however, has a hundred times been proven worthless by history. Any totalitarian or revolutionary regime which, dead to humanitarian impulses, would brutally bring death and suffering and misery to millions now alive in order to bring prosperity and comfort and power to future and fortunate millions yet unborn, which would deny pity and peace to those in its midst in order to bestow them on those who are remote and unseen, is tryi ng to purchase a possibility at such a tragically high present cost that it is not worth having. This is why philosophy says that the same change which, when naturally evolved tomorrow will be right and successful, may be arbitrary, premature, and disastrous today if it can be got only by violence and brutality on a vast scale.
The terrible human cost of these totalitarian and brutalitarian changes is at least equally as important as the economic cost. The resulting success or failure of these changes must be measured by broken hearts and broken bodies as much as by flaunting figures and astronomical statistics. To say that what the world needs today is only a new economic system is as fanatical and unbalanced as to say that it needs only a new dietetic outlook. It does need both these things, and needs them brought into reciprocal balance as well, but it certainly needs something else even more - a new spiritual outlook. The moment we have the understanding or courage to lift our public, economic, political, and social difficulties to the higher levels of religious, mystical, or philosophic insight and thus meet them with full consciousness, that moment they will all be solved. After all, the best laws people can obey are not the dried parchments of written statutes but the living ethical forces of jus tice, goodwill, truth, and service. A country which has such a real ethical foundation will get all the social economic and political reforms it needs as and when it needs them; no murderous revolution will be necessary whenever change must be made to adapt itself to new conditions. Back of the state laws there will then always be unwritten laws shaping them automatically and naturally.
The regimentation of the masses on a solely materialistic basis would enslave them in a different and, to some misguided people, more bearable form than the capitalistic order has already; but still it would enslave them. Any system which forcibly regimented the masses in order to guarantee their basic necessities could doubtless succeed in doing so. But if it would fill their stomachs it might still leave their souls empty.
When the inner life of mankind suffers from acute starvation it becomes inevitable, under the law that governs thought, that his outer life will, in time, also suffer acute starvation. There is this difference: that whereas the inner hunger, being spiritual, is unconscious, the outer hunger, being physical, is conscious. If civilization is dying it is dying because it has no vision, no ideals, no spiritual life. It is not dying because of the War; the War merely accelerated the process which started in prewar days. The storm is upon us and there is no shelter from it.
133
War is a leveller which spreads suffering with a
wide swathe. It is also a teacher which pulls men up sharply and forces them to
look at their lives and, even more important, at themselves.
134
War is the normal state of wild beasts.
If human beings engage in it too, that is because they have not got rid of the
tiger and wolf within themselves.
135
Although war itself is full of horrors it must
not be forgotten that it has an obverse side. In some ways it acts like the
old-fashioned surgical operation of blood-letting. All the moral scum in
humanity's character rises to the surface, concentrated mostly amongst the
totalitarian gangsters, but it rises only that it may be seen for what it is and
cleared off. The sufferings of mankind have an educative value and tend to
adjust the sins and excesses of mankind. It is the ultimate tendency of evil
forces to destroy themselves from within as well as to suffer destruction from
without through the mysterious operation of karma. Materialism reaches its final
culmination in the social and personal crises generated by war. By displaying
its own horrible results before humanity's very eyes, it is, by reaction,
awakening many sleeping mentalities to the need of a spiritual outlook.
136
In a world which has the conflict of opposites
as part of its inherent nature, peace is an illusory goal. Nor in reality is
there even such a thing as neutrality and nonalignment.
137
If brute force really ruled this world then the
Romans would still be ruling the Britons, and the Huns who sacked Rome would
still be ruling that beautiful city. The Persian troops would still be masters
of Egypt and Alexander's troops would still be the masters of Persia. But brute
force is a success only in the beginning and a failure always in the end.
138
It is true that some wars seem to have achieved
a creative result, but how much more painlessly, bloodlessly, could not the same
result have been achieved by nonviolent methods. It might have required a longer
time, more patience, but the cruelty and horror and loss of war would have been
avoided.
139
We may watch the democratic nations trying to
prevent open conflict with the totalitarian ones, but all they are succeeding in
doing is merely to put off the inevitable clash from one year to another. They
cannot succeed because it is in the nature of things that between good and evil
there must be conflict. The evil ever seeks to destroy the good, and the good
must defend itself ever. It could not happen otherwise.
140
The fears which war engenders and the
deprivations which it causes are painful. Yet for those who are too attached to
outward things they are often necessary teachers. Out of the fears, great
heroism has been learned; out of the deprivations, great unselfishness; but
those who respond to such lessons are too few, the influence of the lessons
themselves too ephemeral.
141
When it is said that war is a purifying agent,
it is not meant that our morals are purified; on the contrary, war notoriously
makes them temporarily worse. By enthroning passion and displacing reason, by
generating wild fears and brutal hatreds, the very smoke of war tends to smother
those civilized self-disciplines which make for decent living during the normal
times of peace.
142
This is a world of struggle. The word "peace"
has only a relative meaning. The notion that a society, a civilization, or an
individual can exist in a continuously inert state is an illusory one. As soon
as one kind of war ends, another kind of war begins. A peace of endless
stagnation is impossible. The last kind of peace is that wherein the forces
which must inevitably contend against each other are properly balanced.
143
A great war brings humanity to an emotional
crisis. Such a crisis shakes it out of complacency and indifference toward
religious values.
144
War, with its frightful threat to life and
possessions, its dreadful menace to personal relations, forces mankind to revise
long-established attitudes for better or worse. If it opens one door to atheism,
it also opens another door to religion and still another to mysticism.
145
We live in a state of perpetual war. Back and
forth go the ghostly armies of construction and destruction. Sometimes one and
sometimes the other holds the field in triumph.
146
It is easy for those who are addicted to the
worship of force and violence to misread history and fall into partial or
complete error. They do not understand why an individual or a nation must become
and stay strong from within if victories are not to turn into whips which one
day lash back at the victor.
147
The Roman Eagle flew high into the sky of power
but in the end fell ingloriously to earth. The Indian Lotus flourished long
before yet lives today still. Why? A civilization based on higher laws will
always survive where one based on violence will not.
148
The crushing of finer moral qualities like
mercy, pity, calmness, and forgiveness, which war brings about, helps to
inaugurate a more materialistic period after the war.
149
War always brings about the brutalization of
most of the men who fight in it and yet, paradoxically, the spiritualization of
a minority.
150
The memory of slain relatives and the sight of
crippled ones teaches terrible lessons. Only the fanatic or the ruthless will
refuse to absorb these lessons and will see in those very sufferings a stimulant
to revenge, an inducement to plot for further war.
151
Although war ennobles many people by providing
them with larger motives and wider outlooks through the union of all individuals
in a common aim, although it forces them to make personal aims secondary and
subordinate to the common welfare, it still brutalizes them. It arouses bestial
passions and forms evil characters. It is still an evil and destructive
enterprise which takes away more than it gives, lowers more than it elevates.
152
The bitter lessons of war may be learned aright
but they may also be soon forgotten.
153
What man, what country can feel safe so long as
thermonuclear weapons remain in existence? But if they are banned what of the
lesser horrors which War Departments have developed - germs, gases, rays, and
other obscene nightmarish things?
154
If Atlantis went to its grave under the impulse
of violent eruptions that rocked the world, the Atlantean use of atomic power
for warlike purposes lay behind the eruptions themselves.
155
If men had better character and more intuition
they would not and could not accept such horrors, even in the name of
self-defense.
156
War disrupts customs, dissolves morality, and
destroys art. It alters fate and reveals the good and the bad in human
character. It is the severest test both of a man and a nation. It shocks
religion, blacks out mysticism, but confirms philosophy. When the usefulness of
a tradition is at an end both men and events attack and disintegrate it. The
longer the war went on, the less did it become probable that the old order of
thought could be restored after it.
157
If war comes, the blame must fall not only
outwardly on the men and policies which provoke it, but also inwardly on the
passions and greeds and egoisms which influence leaders and led alike.
158
When there is more of hate than of goodwill
between two nations, and for a sufficient time, it is inevitable under the law
of compensation that physical war will break out between them.
159
War, being ultimately the expression of the
mind's errors and the heart's passions, can only be stopped by getting at it in
the places where it starts: in the mind and the heart themselves. Its cause
being primarily internal it cannot be cured by an external remedy. This means
that neither organized religion nor organized politics can save the world from
the ruin that awaits it. We may wish them well in their attempts but we cannot
help seeing facts which all history causes us to see. The guns and bombs, the
gases and tanks of modern war are only the symbols of man's inner disorder. The
reality behind them is his ignorance of spiritual laws, his blindness to the
fact that all war is a consequence and not a cause. All the national days of
prayer and the eminent ecclesiastics who led them have failed to stop two world
wars in our time. And they failed because they were trying to escape from a
consequence whilst leaving the cause untouched.
160
The sufferings that World War II brought to so
many have deeply shocked us but the significance of those sufferings must also
be examined from a fresh standpoint. In all the theories offered to a bewildered
world concerning its own woes, there is much anxiety and alarm at the symptoms
but little search for the causes. If people accept a deceptive world-view as the
Germans did and as the Russians do, or a defective one as so many others did and
do, they must also accept the troubles and disasters which go with it.
161
We must push the spade of enquiry deep down into
the earth that surrounds the roots of this problem of wars and riots,
aggressions and crimes, rather than be content with a mere surface view. The
evils that menace our existence will then be found to grow out of two roots:
ignorant egoism and unchecked emotion. The one is unnecessary, the other
unreasonable.
162
Each of the world wars which afflicted mankind
was the inevitable self-earned effect of causes previously set going. The
unerring law of karma brings whatever good or evil recompense is deserved. The
debit account of wrong done is allowed to run on until the end of the page and
then it has to be totalled and the balance entered to adjust the total. The
great famines, like the great wars, which afflicted and still afflict mankind,
constitute part of this adjustment, part of the payment which mankind is forced
to make by the higher governing law of karma. Their causes are as plural as the
causes of the wars, although on the deepest level there is only the same single
cause of human ignorance leading to human wrong-doing. One of them is the
refusal of mankind to utilize the earth's grain harvests for its own direct use,
diverting them instead to the use of animals deliberately bred for slaughter and
then eating the grain indirectly in the form of those animals' corpses. Such a
way of supporting l ife is both utterly unnecessary and utterly cruel. The life
of innocent creatures cannot be taken upon such baseless grounds with impunity.
Retribution has hit mankind again and again in the past, with the weapons of
hunger, disease, and war, and it is hitting them again in the present. No
reorganization of agricultural methods on more efficient and more productive
lines, no re-arrangement of trading relations, no governmental subsidies in
cash, tractors, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, or equipment will save mankind
from suffering famines and enduring starvation if it does not face the real
challenge and meet it. A radical change of life is demanded from it, a repentant
change of heart is the only way to win back Nature's smile. It must stop this
unjustified murder of helpless living beings, murdered merely because they are
lower in the scale of evolution. It must accept the perfectly sufficient diet of
grains, cereals, vegetables, pulses, fruits, nuts, and dairy pr oduce which will
enable it to live with less suffering and more health, less punishment and more
conscience, than a meat diet permits.
163
Life brings man what he needs, which is
sometimes what he desires but at other times what he fears. The modern world
badly needed a shake-up, and got one. However, it received only what it
deserved. The war descended on it in accordance with karmic law. When nation
arose against nation, it was only an end-expression of the innate selfishness
which had been actuating them. We must expect such situations, for they are the
natural and inevitable consequence of all that has happened before. Unless the
war has brought a vivid realization of the truth of the law of compensation, it
has not brought any spiritual progress. But it is too much at this time to
expect the modern world to understand the cause of its tribulations. What
valuable ethical and psychological significances, what striking illustrations of
the inexorable law of retribution, could be drawn from the war!
164
The evolutionary pressure upon humanity is not
to give up its fratricidal warfare, although it will eventuate in that, but to
give up the aggressive selfishness in which such warfare has its roots.
165
If the nations cannot settle their differences
peacefully it is because the ego in them is too strong, the passions too
violent, and the antagonisms too blind. The differences must be faced on deeper
than physical levels, and the refusal to do this on the grounds that such are
idealistic and not practical results in superficial and not true considerations
and results.
166
How hard it is to get people to draw accurate
conclusions from their experience one can read from the annals of history. Again
and again the people of one nation race or religion who have been subjected to
persecution by a different one, have failed to behave justly and tolerantly when
the turning wheel of destiny put them later into power.
167
The gusts of hate or anger or greed which blow
men off their mental balance, blow them eventually to war.
168
In spite of the spiritual messages which have
been given to mankind by the great prophets, the savagery of war still continues
to show the strength of the animal in man.
169
If their compassion for helpless animals is so
small that they will not give up eating flesh, by what right do they call upon
God to show compassion toward them and stop war?
170
The world war was not only the consequence of
the desecration of the Egyptian graves, of course. It was much more a
consequence of the evil thoughts and feelings which exist in men's hearts and of
the spiritual ignorance which exists in their minds. The desecration was itself
only one of the symptoms of that ignorance.
171
Evil desires and unjust acts were the seed: the
horrors of war were the fruit. The awful retribution which fell upon whole
nations was impelled and guided by the power behind the eternal and immutable
law of consequences. Up to a certain point, it could have been modified and even
prevented, but beyond this point nothing could annul its appointed course.
172
Let us blame none but ourselves. This holocaust
was needed in order to bring humanity fully to its senses, to purge its
materialistic atheism of its pride, and to show it how hollow and hypocritical
was its facade of civilization.
173
When we penetrate these social, economic,
political, educational, and national problems to rock bottom we find that they
are really ethical problems.
174
Virgil, the Roman, dreamt of universal peace.
Many today entertain the same dream but at the same time they are contradicted
by piled-up evidences of the violence in human nature, the strife engendered by
blind self-interest, the killing instinct that is a heritage from the animal.
175
So long as egos come into conflict with one
another, so long will nations do the same. We are to expect the brutal carnage
and concentrated massacre of war until and unless we are impelled to renounce it
at last as a method of removing affronts to justice.
176
For those whose inward eyes were sufficiently
open to see what was happening behind the scenes and beneath the surface of
things, World War II was a war not only on the military and political planes but
also against those powerful evil spirits whom the apostle Paul called "The
rulers of darkness" practising "spiritual wickedness in high places." That is to
say, it was also a war against a demonistic incursion into human affairs
unparalleled in human history. We were not merely fighting deluded Germans. We
were also fighting unseen evil powers.
177
When the New Year of 1919 dawned, Europe
particularly and mankind almost everywhere believed that what had been lived
through was the most dreadful war in all history. When, however, a score of
years later a second war was spelled in letters of red fire across the
frightened face of this planet, the whole world was lost in bewilderment.
Governments and nations stood aghast at the spectacle of the failure of their
own baffled and bewildered struggles to escape from the spider's web of terrors
into which they had fallen. They gazed perplexed upon an amazing scene such as
the past had never known. A period precisely like unto it was looked for in vain
through all the known records of time.
A surface view of the war informs us that mankind was sacrificed on the blood-stained altar of one man's insensate ambition in Europe and of one clique's militaristic passion in Asia. A philosophic view, however, informs us that this is only partly true. There was very much more behind the war than this simplification suggests. Activating all the other factors and rising from the uncharted depths of human consciousness, there was a cruel psychic attack upon humanity itself, upon all its best hopes and finest prospects, upon everything that had raised it from kinship with the teeth-bared beasts to companionship with sacred intuitions and holy thoughts. And to bring this attack to the completest possible triumph, it was directed against both the bodies and minds of men, against their whole being....[several lines were deleted here in the notebook - Ed.]
The second is the opposition which it encounters from invisible creatures who dwell in a supernatural sphere of utter darkness, who do not belong to its kingdom but who have psychic points of contact with it and ranges of influence over it. This sphere constitutes an element in Nature which is averse to man's upward movement and hostile to his higher characteristics. We do not have to go back to the great religions of antiquity for testimony to its real existence; the recorded experiences of scientific psychical researchers of modernity can provide that too.
It was more difficult for most people to understand correctly what was at stake in the war and what indeed were the forces aligned behind it when the struggle first started than after it had passed progressively through some of its earlier phases. Not till Hitler had overrun nearly all of Europe was it quite clear to everyone except the emotionally foolish or the selfishly biased that the aims which inspired him were such that humanity's whole future was at stake. Those who said World War II was a continuation of World War I were partly mistaken. It was so in a military sense only but not in any other sense. Those who chose to see this as a war between rival exploiting Imperialisms only were blinded by their own emotional complexes. All this terrible holocaust of suffering did not occur in the defense of Euro-American life and liberty alone; it also occurred in the defense of the life and liberty of generations to come throughout the five continents. All were taking part in events of the profo undest historical character.
Why did the dark forces choose our own generation for the launching of their attack? Why did they not choose the seventeenth, eighteenth, or nineteenth centuries? First, never before could such an operation be so effective in result, for never before could a single movement reach so many human souls on a planet-wide scale and at the same moment in time. Hitherto, only a limited area or a particular race could be its objective; now all areas and all races are within its scope. Second, never before was a choice of roads so fateful in its ultimate results. The directions travelled now, the turn given to the stream of events during these few momentous years, the decisions taken by mankind's leaders in this stupendous crisis, will govern the fate and shape the social, spiritual, economic, cultural, political, and personal history of the whole world for many centuries to come.
These reasons combined to make the dark forces attach supreme importance to choosing that time for their attack.
178
Many believed, even up to a decade ago, that
humanity was ready for its next important step forward. But the Nazis showed
that millions were equally ready for its next important step backward. Hence we
must not overestimate the power and scope of the idealism that so fortunately
proved triumphant in the end.
179
It was not merely the fate of this or that
country which was at stake; it was the fate of all mankind. Only an inadequate
comprehension of its background and an imperfect perception of its consequences
could limit its significance to anything less than a universal one.
180
Humanity escaped from the most fearful danger,
the most awful evil of its modern history. The gospel of hate failed to capture
it, but only just failed.
181
There is really another unseen and vicious
struggle beneath the visible one, a desperate aggression against the soul of
humanity itself of which the war became an outward symbol.
182
War came with the thundering gallop of the Four
Horsemen. Its deafening tumult all but drowned the whispers that came from the
higher regions of man's own heart. It threatened to engulf humanity and to
vanquish its soul. No earlier war has had such profound effects on human lives
just as no earlier war has touched so many human lives. Millions of men and
women have been forcibly dislodged from their own homes and even their own
countries and have had to fit themselves in with strangers or with foreigners.
Hitler has heaped sorrow after sorrow upon this unfortunate generation to so
stupendous a degree that history cannot parallel the record. Yet, the end of
this miserable tragedy has been a victory of the forces of light over those of
darkness. Thus, we who live today have lived to see the dramatic vindication of
the moral law.
183
They suffered and fought so bravely in the hope
that evil might not dominate the world.
184
It was not only a war to save what is physically
most precious - our lives and homes - but still more a war to save what is
spiritually most precious - our ethical values. For it is true to say that no
man could be a hardened Nazi with any sincerity and yet possess an ethical
outlook on life.
185
The era of Nazism meant the crucifixion of love
in the Nazis themselves.
186
The issue is whether they wish to take their
place with the evolutionary forces or against them. The Nazis did the latter and
lost.
187
We may frankly admit that those who opposed and
fought Hitler were not entirely disinterested in their motives and that they
made many mistakes out of selfishness in the past. But this must not blind us to
the fact that later the commission of several of those mistakes was frankly
acknowledged and an attempt made to atone for them even though under the duress
of danger and loss.
188
Mussolini told the Italian troops whom he sent
to fight in Russia: "We shall triumph because history teaches that peoples which
represent the ideas of the past must give way before peoples which represent the
ideas of the future." What he said of history was true but what he predicted of
Fascism was false. It was false because there is no future for the glorification
of brute force, elevated though it be to the pedestal of a philosophic doctrine,
in a century which is getting sick and tired of war and which is growing more
enlightened and more rational.
189
Kersten relates that at his first meeting with
the Gestapo chief, he found a copy of the Koran on Himmler's night table, and
that the holy book of the Moslems accompanied the dread little man on all his
travels.
190
Hitler came into power at Berlin in the very
same month and the very same year that Roosevelt came into power at Washington.
The timing was both symbolic and karmic.
191
We have fought this war against military
aggression. But we have yet to realize that it has also been fought against
mental aggression. The Nazis invaded first the minds of their own people and
later those of the people of the countries they occupied. The Japanese Fascists
did precisely the same. For some years before the war the Japanese Government
prohibited the possession of short-wave radio sets. Consequently the Japanese
people were unable to listen in to foreign broadcasts, were unable to hear any
expositions of the democratic standpoint and were inoculated solely with the
same kind of totalitarian poisonous falsehood with which the Nazi government
inoculated the Germans. This planned object of casting the mind of the entire
Japanese nation into the desired mould even took the extreme measure, so curious
to the occidental observer, of a "thought control" police, with its
extraordinary mission of jailing anyone for thinking the wrong thoughts!
192
If we consider the recent history of the Far
East, we shall see the same inexorable force of karma at work. It is known in
certain circles that following the historic events of the l850s' when the
Japanese were forced by foreign warships to open their ports to foreign
commerce, a secret council of the most powerful noble families decided to
revenge themselves on the Westerners as soon as they were in a position to do
so. To bring this about they resolved on a twofold program. The first part was
economic, the second was military. It was at this council too that the plan of
sending capable young men to the West to master its industrial commercial
military and naval secrets was first formulated and at once implemented. The
economic part of this program eventually was completed, and an amazed world
witnessed Japan's industrial and commercial triumph in successfully placing
goods - which a century ago she had not even heard of - at ridiculously low
prices in markets and bazaars thr oughout the five continents. The second part
of this superlatively ambitious program which came to a climax with the war
sought first to drive the whites out of their Asiatic possessions and then to
place all Asia including Siberia, China, and India within a mammoth Japanese
empire. The Japanese war lords bear the onus of having brilliantly conceived and
patiently executed this master plan for domination of the nations. The "Tanaka
Memorial," with its infamous doctrine of conquest through "blood and iron," is
evidence of such a blueprint for conquest when each succeeding stage of the plan
was brought to a successful conclusion. What is the inner meaning of the spirit
which actuated this secret council and the successes which followed it? The
obvious reply to this question is that Japan was hysterically driven by a
subconscious intellectual and physical inferiority-complex to seek revenge. This
is correct but it lies upon the surface of history and does not touch the d
epths. For still more wa s Japan raised up in Asia by the same karmic forces
which raised up Hitler in Europe.
193
The history of the melancholy capitulation to
German arms or to German terrorism or to German bribery of the smaller
countries, one by one, during World War II is a history of the disaster of
suicidal disunity. Standing shoulder to shoulder, speaking and fighting
simultaneously, they could have put up a vigorous resistance - sufficient to
have brought worthwhile external aid in time. Further, the tragedy of France's
quick catastrophic fall before the onslaught of Hitler's legions was twofold. On
the mental side it was a tragedy of shameful treachery in high places, of
divided counsels and clashing leadership, of corrupt politicians and
conservative generals, and finally of national inability to rise above narrow
interests. Even the military defeat of France was largely a stage-managed
affair. A few highly placed French Nazis as good as betrayed their country to
the German Nazis. Their intentions were good but their understanding was bad.
The consequences of these defects appeared in the half heartedness with which
she wasted the valuable opening weeks of the war, those weeks when Hitler was
attacking Poland, and in the suicidal spirit of indifference and lack of
conviction which permeated the army. On the physical side it was a tragedy of
out-of-date technique and inferior equipment, of inability to understand that
men could no longer hold out against machines. The Old Staff, wedded to the
Maginot line as they were, did not perceive how rapidly it had become antiquated
strategy. For armoured motorized divisions and blitzkrieg tactics had largely
destroyed the value of line and position fighting. The plane, the tank, and the
parachute, massed in synchronized attack, were the symbols of modern warfare -
but the significance of this symbolism was only half-understood. The fact is
that France was defeated from within even before she was attacked from without.
Finally, during that fateful September of 1939, there was the pathet ic
spectacle of Polish generals - twe tieth-century men with nineteenth-century
minds - honestly and sincerely attempting to oppose Nazi tank offensives with
cavalry charges!
194
Mussolini was acquainted as a young man with the
Buddhist mystical doctrines and did a little reading on them, but he flatly said
in the end he did not want them because they were enervating to his ego. When
Rosita Forbes, the well-known traveller, once asked Mussolini, "Do you believe
in God?" he answered, "No, I do not believe in any power other than my own. If I
did I should be smashed." He was interested, for the avowed object of developing
his personal force, in the study and practice of Tantrika yoga. This is a system
of yoga which originated in Bengal but is now prevalent chiefly in Tibet. It
easily becomes an instrument to serve personal ambitions.
195
The evil forces working through mediums are
cunning enough not to show their true ultimate aims all at once. These become
clear to the observer only by successive stages, only gradually. Whoever has
critically studied the ways of evil spirits will know that they first lure their
mediumistic victims or gullible public along the path of self-injury or even
self-destruction by winning their confidence with a series of successful
predictions or favourable interventions. When this confidence has been well
established, these dark forces then reveal their real intent by persuading their
victims, through gigantic lies or false predictions, to commit a final act in
which everything is staked on a single throw. The unhappy dupes invariably lose
this last throw and are then overwhelmed by shattering disaster. This occurred
in Hitler's case with his sudden attack on Russia in 1941. He then stated his
belief that Moscow would be reached within six to seven weeks. But his soldiers
never reached Moscow. His invisible guides had indeed betrayed him. How true are
Shakespeare's words from Macbeth, Act 1, Scene 3: "But 'tis strange:/ And
oftentimes, to win us to our harm,/ The instruments of darkness tell us truths,/
Win us with honest trifles, to betray us/ In deepest consequence."(P)
196
Hitler was a man who had been born with a
natural faith in selfishly used occultism. On the one hand, his hypnotic forces
were of a superlative order whilst on the other, he had completely surrendered
himself to the direction of intuitive influences; next, he was a clairvoyant
visionary and dynamic worker who both saw the coming of and sought to
materialize a new epoch for mankind.
We may regard the appearance of a Hitler sitting on his Bavarian peak and menacingly surveying the European scene as a phenomenon as evil as a tiger looking for prey. We do so because he appears such a strange inversion of all that is elevated in human character. Millions still regard him as a devil incarnate because he wounded their best feelings or behaved towards them in monstrous ogre-like fashion or stretched them on the rack of mental or physical torture or shattered their domestic comfort or brought horrible sufferings down upon them. He is loathed as a base and brutal megalomaniac who wielded his power by creating fear, exploiting prejudice, and falsifying facts.
197
It was a part of Hitler's evil mission to draw
the Germans into a trap of moral self-destruction. The bait was worldly
aggrandizement based on an unscientific and arrogant racial exclusiveness,
narrower and crueler than any the world has ever seen. Such a bait was eagerly
swallowed. All the Satanic strength of the Nazis was concentrated on its
accomplishment. The result was ruin and chaos, complete and final, for the
entire German people. And over the dismal scene that was the prostrate body of a
once-proud nation lay the shadow of that ruthless colossus with feet of clay -
Hitler!
It may be nowadays a platitude to declare that the Germans have failed to recognize any higher moral law than "Might is right," yet it is the sad truth. The first tragedy of the Germans is their failure to learn from experience. How to revive their moral faculties which have been deadened by blind obedience to evil leaders is another problem. The Nazis with their savage mentality and terrible might, have lost their high priest, Hitler. But they have lost neither their vindictiveness nor their arrogance. They are unteachable. Every thoughtful person must feel uneasy about mankind's future. He will remember that late in 1944, when the Russian army had already invaded German soil, Hitler's Chief of Staff, General Guderian, told a gathering of cheering adolescent youths, "We shall wage war again even if we are defeated." He will remember too that when Rudolf Hess told his British captors, "If we are beaten this time, we shall fight a third war and win," he was not only speaking for himself but also for millions of young Nazis.
198
Nazism, for all its humbug, pretense, and
imposture, was essentially the dangerous incarnation of a totally evil force,
dedicated to serve the criminal instincts and lustful appetites of its
adherents. It was an attempt to lead the masses into spiritual perdition. Its
massed power found a perfect focal point in the mediumship of Hitler and his
traffic with unclean spirits. There is no doubt he had given his active consent
in full consciousness at every stage of his career to the evil forces which were
swaying him. He could not be held irresponsible for them to any degree
whatsoever. The terrible forces of malevolent design and fierce hatred operated
through him and all his Nazi plotters. Hitler's insane lust to degrade the human
mind and destroy its ideals was, to those who were clairvoyant enough to pierce
the psychic veil, nothing less than the outcome on the physical plane of these
violent attempts by diabolic forces to possess us for their own evil purposes.
The dark forces which ensouled the Nazi leaders strove to promote animosity,
bitterness, jealousy, and greed, and to inflame the most bestial elements of
mankind. Attacking the human soul from another angle, Nazi theory and practice
drastically curtailed or totally denied the free exercise of the human entity's
highest rights - to think, to speak, to choose between right and wrong, and to
worship God. The spiritual dangers to mankind which resided in a Nazi victory
are awful to contemplate. Never before had its inner life been so satanically
invaded. From the very first, the guiding hands of the Powers of Darkness were
in evidence when the use of ruthless force became the Nazi rule, because the way
of brutal compulsion belongs to the unseen destroyers, the adverse element in
creation.
But the long battle between the instruments of Light and Darkness is not at an end. The dark powers have sought to prevent the emergence of a more enlightened era. They have tried to do this through the virulent and violent German Nazis but failed. They will try to do it again. The re-alignment of the Nazi-minded and their antagonists will now take place in a lesser form inside many countries. The forces of evil did not sound their retreat with the downfall of Hitler. The anti-Nazi powers are gathering great strength but they will have to face a fresh alignment of these opponents. The struggle will next be so fundamental and against such irredeemable vicious enemies then as it was during the war itself.
199
Hitler talked of setting up a United States of
Europe, an idea which he borrowed from Napoleon. But whereas Napoleon wanted to
unite Europe in peace, prosperity, and intellectual progress, Hitler wanted to
unite it in misery, enslavement, and intellectual retrogression. Napoleon sought
out the intelligentsia wherever his armies went but Hitler imprisoned, tortured,
or killed them wherever his Gestapo could catch them. Napoleon in his heart
fought for the extension of democracy whereas Hitler in his materialism fought
for the extension of Germany's boundaries. Napoleon's troops marched to the tune
of an international ideal of freedom from medieval fetters whereas Hitler
marched to the tune of national greed. He spread his brown horror of carnage and
corruption all over Europe, whilst Liberty lay dying in a dungeon. He saw truth
indeed but only to distort and pervert it. He talked like a sage of "the
nothingness and insignificance of the individual human being," but whereas the
sage use s this truth to point the way to individual liberation, Hitler used it
to point the way to individual enslavement. His self-proclaimed inspiration was
spurious, his sociological insight was chimerical, and only he himself knew how
much his reiterated pacifism was a fraudulent camouflage. It is true that he
first animated the German people into a feverish activity, but instead of
directing their prodigious efforts toward worthy ends which could have made
millions happier, he directed them toward ignoble ones and made more millions
more wretched than any other dominant group had ever done in history. Hitler's
talk of a new order meant in his own mind an order under which Germany enslaved
feudalistically but exploited modernistically every other nation.
200
Hitler's private conversations, even more than
his public declarations, amply reveal that he clearly realized that. He not only
saw much of this but, in his brutal and ignorant way, tried to construct this
new order by deliberate planned effort. He set waves in motion. "The Nazi
movement has finally closed the Feudal Age forever," he once declared privately.
"All these tremendous changes are inevitable and it is National Socialism alone
which understands their significance and works actively for a new era. Our task
is to remake the world on modern and unprecedented lines. We alone possess the
vast imagination and creative willpower to get out of the common somnolence of
living in the antiquated past and attempt it successfully." Amid all his obvious
charlatanry, Hitler was something of a clairvoyant. But his mental eyes being
diseased, he could see only distorted visions. Consequently, he not only
caricatured, degraded, and falsified ideas which were originally sound, but
instead of understa nding that the greatly needed historical upheaval was to be
brought about for the universal benefit of all mankind, he could understand only
that it was to be brought about for the exclusive benefit of the Germans. Hence
his evil visions led in the end to miserable failure where they might have led
to the success that attends the perception of dynamic historical inner
necessity, and his idealism became so grossly limited and distorted that its
artificial achievements constituted a curse and not a blessing for mankind.
What, at a time when contemporary history was so drastically at work, could have
become a movement for ending world enslavement, what the time-spirit demanded
for the uplift of all men, Hitler was willing to concede only for the selfish
aggrandizement of a particular group of men. This is why he achieved the
gigantic success that he did and why it was followed later by equally gigantic
failure. He could have rendered an incomparable servi ce to the world but
instead rendered an in comparable disservice to it. For the new age he tried to
usher in was immeasurably worse than the old one. Nazi victory would have
spiritually put the evolutionary clock back for centuries. It would have meant a
spiritual defeat, a moral degeneration, and an intellectual black-out.
201
Childhood, adolescence, and the threshold of
adulthood represent the most impressionable periods of the human being's life.
The possibilities of uplifting moral character, improving thinking power, and
unfolding mystical intuition during such periods are much more than most people
believe. Hitler fully realized this truth and turned it to suit his own devilish
purposes with such startling success as to vindicate its immense importance. He
falsified science and mutilated history, but his greatest harm was to poison the
minds of the younger generation with that most dangerous of all infections -
hatred. He cunningly taught millions of young boys and girls to think daily and
solely of the righteousness of his cause until they came to believe in it with
the strong faith that an earlier generation gave to God.
202
There is a historical connection between the
Jews, Egypt, India, and ultimately Atlantis which carries a story that curiously
repeats itself. What Hitler did to the Jews was done under purely psychic
guidance, for he was an excellent spiritistic medium and knew it. He almost
daily took a half hour or so to go into semi-trance and get his guidance,
inspiration, and spirit-communications.
203
The Director General of Archeology of India
visited Germany shortly before the war. He told me there were twenty-seven
university chairs of Sanskrit in Germany prior to the Nazi regime. Under Hitler
they did next to nothing for there were hardly any students to use them!
204
The growth of totalitarian beliefs before that
fateful September day in 1939 when the first bombs broke upon Europe again,
however much and however rightly it is to be deplored, is not to be dismissed as
an historical accident. Powerful causes must have lain behind it. The
philosophically minded have to probe beneath the surface and find why
totalitarianism succeeded in having for a time the fatal appeal which it did.
And - leaving aside such success as it gained through wielding the bloody clubs
of brutal violence and barbarian terror, as well as its offering of a speedy
solution of harassing economic difficulties - among these reasons we shall find
that it represented a half-formed substitute in the popular mind for the
religion which it had lost. We shall never understand the meaning of
totalitarianism's appeal unless we begin to understand that it was not only the
outcome of a few evil men's crooked personal ambitions, but also the outcome of
a falsely directed religious instin ct.
205
At the very outset a contemplation of Hitler's
significance is faced by an intricate interweaving of separate questions such as
the psychological character and philosophic place of his personality, the
function of war, the play of historic, economic, and political forces, and so
on. He stood in such an intimate relation with his age that valuable lessons may
be drawn from its study.
What was Hitler? We all know about the rapid and remarkable progress of this ex-corporal in a Bavarian regiment to the citadel of continental power, but what was his psychological and philosophical significance? It would be a mistake to regard him as an arrogant if ignorant man who, by starting the Nazi party at Munich, merely sought to complete the logical chain and conclude the chauvinistic work initiated by his predecessors and contemplated by the unteachable Army High Command. He sought to achieve something tremendously larger, something of which the mere expansion of Germany was but a part, although a most important part.
Instrumental puppets of Destiny like him are pushed forward at the appointed time on the stage of historical events, allowed to play their parts, and then are doomed to disappear. Hence although Hitler gained the temporary empire that he sought, spread from the Arctic to the Aegean seas as it was, it fell rapidly from his grasp when the inevitable karmic reaction came into play. When the tides of karma turned against him, he met first with frustration and then with failure. And the destruction of effete forms does not take so long a time as the construction of new ones. Therefore we could confidently have looked forward to an early end of that chaotic period. The doom of the terror-filled Nazi regime was preordained. The other agencies that were to complete this historical drama were being groomed for the dramatic epilogue.
Because the thoughts of millions of people were concentrated against him; because thought is a potent power which tends sooner or later to objectify itself; because all these millions were thinking destructively and antagonistically against him; because such a tremendous volume of intensely one-pointed thought has never before been known in world history; because all this power, which clutched him and his people like an octopus, was bound to materialize eventually; a complete defeat for Hitler's military and civilian armies and a complete collapse of Hitler himself were inevitable, even though his crooked cross had been bombastically carried right through the entire continent of Europe. Those who knew the occult powers of thought and the inner workings of karma knew also that nothing was surer than the nemesis which would fall inexorably upon this barbarous man and his gang, for their vast violation of moral laws. He sowed and therefore unfailingly reaped the worst destiny which any man of the twentieth century has yet made. Even during his lifetime his own arrogance turned eventually to anxiety and that again to despair. And when his pilgrimage to perdition was at an end with his career, he had to undergo a preliminary purgation in the only hell that there is, the hell of the awful dream of forcibly receiving the suppressed hatreds of his victims, the terrible post-death nightmare of re-witnessing their agonized experiences from their standpoint. It were a dozen times better for Hitler and his misguided helpmates to have died early than to have lived long. For the evil destiny they made for themselves during those extra years of life will be nothing more than so much extra suffering they will have to endure.
206
Hitler sat upon his Bavarian peak and cunningly
meditated in his diseased vanity how to sit upon all Europe itself and gain the
chauvinistic glory he thirsted for. He finally translated his dream into
visibility, but only to find in the end that he had sat upon a volcano in which
all the peoples of Europe burst forth in the mightiest revenge-seeking upheaval
history has ever known.
Many people became so depressed by Hitler's early and easy recurring victories as to believe that he would win the war, and they became so deceived by his High Command's facade of ruthless efficiency as to believe that he was utterly invincible. Apart from other factors of internal weakness, they often overlooked one which was of immense importance: the mental one. They did not notice the invisible deterioration of the nerve of the German people, the hidden breaking of morale, and the spread of social neurosis. Underneath even the egoistic bombast of the Nazi Party members themselves, there gradually grew up a psychosis of fear, a malady of jittery nerves, and a palsy of flagging will. The German mind generally became more and more filled with confusions and anxieties, with inability to defeat growing doubts. The passage from these concealed cracks to a sudden and open national nervous breakdown, as the realization of useless suffering and needless loss became clearer, was therefore only a mat ter of time.
207
Hitler successfully dealt out iconoclastic blows
not only at the conventional political religions and military ideology of his
time but also at the conventional theories of economics of his time. A Germany
ruined first by defeat and then by inflation, a Germany filled with the misery
of six million registered unemployed and their families was turned by him into a
Germany everywhere busily at work, filled with new activity, throbbing with new
enterprise. What though this was done as a preparation for war? It could have
been done - just as easily - if Hitler had been less evil-minded, as a
preparation for peace, and the factories which made guns and tanks could have
made harmless useful goods instead. But the fact is that the factories ceased to
remain empty, the workers ceased to remain idle, and the wheels of industry
began to go round again. Aside from what he stole from the Jews, this was done
without importing fresh capital from abroad. But greatly to increase the
productive cap acity of the country without first greatly increasing the capital
of the country was an impossible feat according to the orthodox doctrines of
economics. This historic accomplishment exposed the foolishness of those stupid
and selfish doctrines which had made money, the physical token of exchange, into
the one and only symbol of wealth, which had tried to perpetuate the antiquities
and heartlessness of capitalism. Our social and economic ills must be healed.
Yet they cannot be healed by the old medicines any more than by the new poisons
of Hitler.
208
The war was a test which showed humanity (and
those who observe it) just where it stood. It showed up the hidden evil as well
as the hidden good, revealed the lurking weakness and the unused strength. If
true religion had prevailed in Germany, the Nazis with their selfishness,
aggressiveness, and trickery could not have prevailed also. But this test was an
extreme one. We need not fear that fresh Hitlers, more Mussolinis, are always
going to arise. They will not. Dictators and their dictations are but transient
instruments of the world-changes which mark the last years of a dying age. The
world did not encourage the initial monstrous acts of Hitler, but neither did it
oppose them. This was evidence of its own inner weakness. It is true, Hitler led
his people finally to humiliation and ruin but that does not absolve the world
of having contributed to the possibility of the Hitleristic regime. He was our
tutor, raised to cause suffering to himself, his people, and ourselves, that the
world might learn the futility of materialism, greed, envy, and selfishness.
209
Hitler confused statecraft with stagecraft.
Hence, his love of taking the limelight with a new sensation every now and then
before the war! But with the turn of the tide of events in his enemies' favour,
Hitler was singularly silent. His speeches became rare and even then were filled
with feeble evasions of the true and terrible situation into which he had led
those who so blindly followed him. For nothing was so formidable as its facts.
He twisted arguments and tortured words - but there were its facts staring
everybody in the face. His judgements became faulty, his new ventures ill-fated,
even his fresh conquest of territory proved in the end to be a fresh burden he
had to bear. Hitler's procrastination in attacking England immediately after
Dunkirk was the beginning of that series of colossal mistakes which he was led
to commit and which themselves led first to a process of crumbling and then to
his downfall. Like all his lesser prototypes, he was ruined by his own
ambitions. Thus Hit ler, the arch-destroyer, has himself been destroyed.
210
In becoming the unparalleled monster which he
did become, Hitler was a traitor to the human race. For he sank back to the
cruelty, passion, and rage of the wild-animal kingdom but added to them the
mental profits of his sojourn in the human kingdom, all its perverted thinking
power, without however showing those finer qualities which even animals possess.
Those who talked with him were often appalled by the hatred and vindictiveness
which punctuated his coarse criticisms. Such swift and strong passions had to
find an outlet and this was provided by the cruel, aggressive, and brutal acts
which marked his rule. He was a votary of violence. In the field of
international diplomacy, his brutality was marked by crafty artfulness. It took
some time before the contrast between his suave, disarming speeches and his
violent, ferocious deeds became evident. He dwelt in an atmosphere of pure evil,
and hatred was the natural air he breathed. When it came to expressing it, he
wielded a really wicked tongue. He not only flayed the skin off those who stood
in his path but thereafter proceeded to disembowel them. The hate-poisoned
atmosphere which he created throughout Europe, both amongst his sympathizers and
his victims, was his worst legacy.
211
Why did the Nazis quickly proceed to clamp down
all freedom of speech and to shoot or shut up in concentration prisons all the
intelligentsia? It is simply because truth can afford to encourage criticism,
whereas falsehood fears it. Nazi Germany proved the irony of human
suggestibility, that there, where truth was most absent, the people were led to
believe it was most present. The Nazis invented pretexts for invasion as they
invented history for propaganda. They did this because it was useful to them.
Their followers, however, honestly believed both pretexts and history because
the hypnotic power of suggestion had influenced them. If we remember the
mentally dark and morally savage state of Europe during the long stretch of
centuries between the time of Justinian and the twelfth century, that period
which has been well named the Dark Ages, we can picture something of the New
Order which Hitler wanted to inaugurate. Had he triumphed there would have been
no further philosophy for a generation. From national falsehoods to
international deceptions, his work of instilling darkness into men's minds went
on unimpeded. The ideal of a government with clean hands and clear conscience
was not only utterly alien to him, but also utterly despised by him. He raised
brigandage to the status of statesmanship! His faithful satellites and partners
in treachery busied themselves feverishly to explain away the deceptions and
duplicities which lurked behind Hitler's words. First the German nation believed
his fabrications, then large numbers in other nations believed them. It
illustrated how those who begin by disdaining reason, end by accepting
absurdity. Most people have only dimmed spiritual lights but here we have the
awful case of men with wholly extinguished lights, without retaining the
slightest trace of reverence for spiritual values.
212
Impulsive immature youth could not fail to see
that farcical outworn ideas were still being imposed on the people. It was
natural that in countries where the economic structure was quickly
disintegrating and where emotions are always strong they should fall victim to
the impassioned voice of iconoclastic demagogues like Hitler. He disregarded the
old idols which had lost their charm and began to construct new but not better
ones, for their hollowness was hidden behind cheap gaudy tinsel. He invested
these materialistic and militaristic gods with the glamour of messianic
religiosity and thus satisfied both the political and inner yearnings of the
young at a single stroke. Today's call is for inspired leaders and inspired
teachers; today's need is of institutions that will serve rather than exploit,
and concepts that will ennoble rather than degrade. The new currents of life
need new molds in which to flow, new institutions through which to reveal
themselves. The task ahead of them is vitally im portant and extremely difficult
but also tremendously inspiring.
213
Hitler is to be seen not as he was first hailed,
that is, as the re-creator of his country, but as the unconscious instrument of
Nemesis, as a vulgar channel for inescapable historic forces. Above all human
dictators rises the unnoticed figure of their dictator - karma! Even this
vile unspeakable Hitler was a punitive instrument in the hands of mankind's
karma, a sadistic agent of planetary self-earned fate.
214
Did Hitler, as some assert, sit in communion
with spirit-forces before he gave those electrifying speeches in the stadium at
Nuremburg? And was the building erected for this purpose a copy of the Temple of
the Sphinx? What is the evidence for these assertions? That Hitler was a medium
and that he did sit for periods in this kind of trance is known.
215
Since ancient times the swastika, turning
clockwise, symbolizes universal creation, but turning anti-clockwise, it
symbolizes universal destruction.
216
After Hitler rose from being the Madman of
Munich to a dizzier success as the Barbarian of Berlin, he did not fail
frequently to refer to himself in his public speeches as being the instrument of
a God-ordained mission, the holy co-worker with Divine Providence. "I can only
thank God Almighty for giving me the strength and knowledge to do what had to be
done," he told the Reichstag in the midst of the war. He spoke of the mission
which Providence had entrusted to him. But in the end his mission turned out to
be nothing more than an insane desire to exploit the bodies of all non-Germans
and enslave the minds of all Germans. He talked in public of relying on the
Almighty God but actually in private relied on the Almighty Gestapo. He spoke,
too, of the New Order he was creating which would unify Europe. But in the last
scenes it turned out to be merely the old tyranny in new disguise. In his book
Mein Kampf Hitler preened himself on being an astute psychologist. So far
as the appeal to a ll that is basest and worst in men was concerned this is
undoubtedly true. But so far as the understanding of all that makes up the
pattern of human existence was concerned it is undoubtedly false. In the end he
showed himself to be the worst psychologist history has yet known. He was astute
enough to hit on the urgent need of mankind for dynamic leadership, its acute
yearning for a Moses to bring it out of the confusion in which it found itself.
But being himself mentally unbalanced he could and did lead it into only more
and not less mental confusion, more and not less physical misery.
217
Even amid the wartime turmoil there were some
who found their way - however intermittently and fragmentarily - to the deep
peace of the spiritual life. To have achieved this during such a period is a
good augury, for consider what these individuals will be able to achieve in the
somewhat more leisurely and quieter postwar period. Within the atmosphere of
inner peace, they will be able to continue their progress into the knowledge of
the profounder realities of life.
218
Although the war aroused a number of people to
mystical seeking, it was unfavourable to mystical practice. It broke into the
privacy of the individual's life, introduced the communal pattern of living, and
in many cases destroyed one's chance for a long period of getting any solitude
at all, and - even much more - of that precious creative silence which is
indispensable for the mystical life.
219
It was hard to study metaphysics during the era
of bursting bombs, almost impossible to practise meditation during the din of a
six-year war. The call then was to action in the service of menaced humanity, to
prayer in the deepening of personal faith, and to endurance of ideals amid a
planet's trembling and rocking.
220
The war, with its abnormal excitement, physical
hardship, and enormous suffering - and especially its loss of privacy - made
meditation difficult, unattractive, and, to most people, even impossible. It can
be said therefore that the art of meditation was one of the inevitable
casualties of the war. Although the tumult, violence, and extroversion of the
time made it more needed than ever before, unfortunately the opportunities and
conditions for its practice became more difficult than ever before. The general
shake-up of wartime broke the even lives of many aspirants. Many, if not most,
were forced into entirely new and often uncongenial environments with apparently
uncongenial companions. They may have deplored the inability to make any
spiritual progress under such conditions, but they were wrong. Progress is not
solely a matter of having the time and solitude, the freedom and quietude for
study and meditation. Nor is it dependent solely on forming contacts with
like-minded people . Other factors are also concerned. Indeed, insofar as it
showed them how the unfamiliar so-called materialistic half of the world lived,
insofar as it drew them out of complacent attitudes and smug intellectual ruts,
insofar as it shattered ignorance of realities - however hard or ugly - that
form important parts of human experience but which had previously been fled
from, the change was not a useless one.
221
Throughout the stress of the war period the
human mind was tuned to a pitch of constant anxiety and the human body was often
subject to pain or hardship. Nerves need to be healed. External peace must be
matched by internal peace. The time for a wide-scale establishing of meditation,
whose liberating practice brings peace and whose right pursuit weaves a necklace
of noble thoughts around the neck, is at hand.
222
Only a small percentage of the mystically minded
could escape the influence of the war. Most could not adopt the ivory tower
attitude but had to look problems straight in the face.
223
Only after the guns of war are silenced do most
men and women have the leisure in which to receive the instruction and appraise
the worth of philosophy.
224
Many people found no compensating good at all in
the tragedy of World War II. Most Europeans lost more or less of their
possessions, such as money, property, relatives, home, security, even life
itself. What was this but a compulsory self-mortification, a forced renunciation
of the world, an involuntary detachment from earthly things? The ascetics,
would-be saints, and God-seekers of all lands and times have practised a
precisely similar renunciation but they did it voluntarily. They gave up the
external life in the hope of finding a better one internally. Millions of people
during the war who tried to cling to their earthly things and life, as well as
the few who did not, were forcibly detached from both. This created the feeling
of being tired of living, of the hopelessness of seeking satisfaction in
transitory existence, and of the instability of all external situations. Such a
drastic experience forced them to think, to wonder at the meaning of it
all, and thus, to a microscop ic extent, to seek after Truth. And what is
one here on this planet for if not for this same purpose? It is humanity's
school.
225
Let us not submit to the feeling of utter
despair which would paralyse all efforts at self-improvement or at
world-improvement. The recent wars have given birth to much pondering by many
persons about the meaning of life, although most of it is as yet inarticulate.
If they could see the meaning of the events which have crashed into life during
recent years, they would see that the evolutionary trend is carrying them away
from crass materialism and unbalanced externality.
226
The war was a cause of bringing people to the
quest of the Overself and its serene blessedness. The aftermath of uncertain
peace is bringing more. For they find so much present insecurity of life and
possessions, so much uncertainty of future, that they turn to the Quest for
peace.
227
Where they will not make a beginning to go out
of their negative side, out of their lower nature, life itself is forcing them
out of it. Where they will not let others educate them into a larger
understanding, the violence of events is starting to teach it.
228
The metaphysical basis of altruistic proposals
is, in part, sound enough. It teaches that we must clearly negate the illusions
of individual existence if we would arrive at the truth of individual existence.
The greatest of those illusions is that, in the external world, an individual
stands separate, apart and alone. He does not. He cannot. Hence when the war
compelled entire nations and entire classes within a nation to co-operate in
many different ways in order to win it, this dire necessity showed them the
virtue and value of co-operation. It made every individual realize that he was
not merely a separate individual alone but also a member of an interdependent
community. That is to say, the individual began to work for the common welfare
because it was essential to his own welfare, too. At first he did it
involuntarily and unavoidably, but he did it. And through the actual experience
of doing so, a few individuals began to appreciate the ideal itself. But they
were only the few: for the many, when the war ended, the outer stimulus to such
an attitude also ended. So the altruistic ideal quickly sank below the horizon
again.
229
We are not suggesting that anyone should embrace
the fatalism so characteristic of the Orient; we are suggesting only that one
should arrive at a more balanced view of life. The lack of it forced soldiers
and civilians alike to learn through the sufferings of experiences what they
could have learned through the calmness of reflection. The perilous situations
of wartime brought about a vein of fatalism in many minds to whom it was
hitherto unknown. It made them realize for the first time how small is the
circle of freedom in which the human will operates. Those who so arrogantly
defended the extreme freedom of the human will in the past are losing their
following, as the opposite idea of extreme fatalism creeps into the Western
hemisphere from Asia.
230
This belief in an inevitable destiny had largely
gone from the modern mind, until the activities of Hitler and the atomic menace
began to put it back there.
231
It is as misleading an oversimplification to
assert that the war has made men more spiritual as it is to assert that it has
made them more materialistic.
232
Those who hold the thought that the postwar
world can continue to hold the materialistic outlook of the prewar one without
destroying itself hold an illusion. It would be pleasant for many to be able to
do so comfortably, but that assuredly is not happening and those who look
forward to it are merely cultivating self-deception.
233
After the shattering of great cities and the
uprooting of agonized millions, smug unthought-out ideas began to disappear
along with smug unthought-out lives. Disillusionment crept into the air. With
the hoarse tumultuous roar of ack-ack guns, the need of a new conception of
human existence sounded in human consciousness.
234
The war and preparations for it aroused everyone
to the need of re-adjustment to the new problems which it raised. Such a
re-adjustment cannot be effected by escapist meditation alone nor by blind
action alone nor by merely intellectual reasoning alone. What is needed to meet
these problems successfully is a combination of all the three. This is one of
the foremost lessons of the war.
235
Such a historical crisis gave millions of people
the chance to make a fresh start in moral life.
236
The coming of peace will affect different
sections and divergent groups variously. Some will turn more than ever towards
scepticism in thought and sensualism in conduct. Others will take the greatest
interest in political reforms and economic changes and regard these as
all-important for society and the individual. A third section will become aware
of their spiritual poverty, feeling an inner void which, do what they will,
cannot be evaded and which they will have to fill by religious revival or
mystical practices.
237
Those who thought that the gamble with death
which war brought to almost the entire younger generation, called them to snatch
hastily at brief, trivial frivolities, or even entitled them to cast moral
restraints impatiently aside, naturally outnumbered those who were brought by
the same tragic gamble to a more serious and spiritual outlook and a more
disciplined and elevated conduct. It is the easier way to forget danger in
feverish but transient pleasure, the harder one to remember it in stern,
ennobling self-dedication.
238
Although these widespread wartime changes are
leading to greater individualization, this is not an affirmation that the
break-up of family life is at all desirable. The moral dangers which such a
dislocation would lead to have already been revealed in the war's effect on many
young people. Family life is an indispensable social safeguard, the most
valuable medium for promoting right moral attitudes amongst those who are
passing through the stages of childhood and adolescence. A true
individualization of the human entity will not destroy but rather conserve all
that is best in the family spirit.
239
More and more people are striving to realize the
divine presence within themselves. But although markedly larger than was the
case before the war, their number is still all too few.
240
Thus, out of the pain and death of war, one
section of humanity has learnt to cherish the finer values of life and to
nurture those attributes which distinguish them from the animals, whereas
another section has become more selfish, more destructive, and more sensual. The
limited degree of free will which both possess has been used for advancement by
the one and for debasement by the other.
241
The stupendous trials of this war and the
perplexing chaos of this period have demonstrated the need of inner support as
the placid relaxations of peace had never done. Those who have found such
support for the first time, who have wrested such profit from their misfortunes,
who have alleviated their earthly grief by newly learned lessons of religious,
mystical, or philosophical import, represent those who have responded to the new
evolutionary influence of our transitional age.
242
If it will lead to anything it will lead to a
greatly altered world. The religious and cultural problems which follow in its
wake cannot be dealt with in the old way. Men feel the need and utter the demand
for a rational realistic revision of religion and a broadening of science and
outlook which will be iconoclastic in scope.
243
The war has passed over our heads and left us
with three groups of religious attitudes: people who believe in the reign of
higher laws, people who disbelieve in it, and (the largest group) people who
half-believe in it.
244
The evolutionary forces are against those who
would cling to the comfortable prewar egotisms and materialisms. Inability to
draw correct lessons from recent experience still being widespread, they may try
their utmost to do so but will only gather fresh miseries for their trouble.
They must either move their thinking with the new times and their morality with
the new ideals or endure the consequences.
245
The war produced two different reactions among
people. Either it uplifted them or it degraded them.
246
The terrific shocks which nations and
individuals received during the war aroused them to the imperative need of
finding new ways of life. The breakdown of old supports was most marked. What
people would not do voluntarily was expedited by the painful hammer-blows of
calamitous karma into urgent birth.
247
A large class has emerged from the war which has
had its lower nature strengthened by the grim experience. It does not care for
serious truths or noble ideals.
248
Some men have begun to think about life. They
want to know its meaning and to trace out its purpose. The world upheaval, war,
and crisis have forced them into situations which showed up their ignorance of
both.
249
The world wars have hardened hearts, brutalized
natures, and externalized interests. That is, they have made people more
materialistic. But on the other hand they have also brought Orient and Occident
into closer touch, so that the cultures of both have widened. Our spiritual
knowledge has been enlarged and aesthetic life has been refined.
250
The prewar structure of society, being built on
the sands of a merely external and materialist view of life, was unable to
withstand the storms of war and began to come down with a crash.
251
Spiritual beliefs which were merely the result
of wishful thinking, which were not based on impersonal and factual analysis of
the human situation, were sharply challenged by the war and its aftermath. Those
who held them had either to let them go and reconcile themselves to the real
perspective or suffer vainly and uselessly for them. They had indeed to face the
stark reality without any comfortable illusions. The medieval sleep which kept
the eyelids of certain people conveniently half-closed to what was happening all
around them was painfully ended. The era of destructive violence and brutal
terrorism through which they have been passing marks the failure of orthodox
religions and the futility of clinging to materialist ways of living in this
twentieth century of light. The old ways are being left behind but the new way
has not yet been found. There are those who have been looking for a new hope for
mankind to arise out of the universal carnage and in contrast to its terrible
background. Th e hope itself has varied with the temperament which entertained
it. With some it is a new economic order, with others it is a religious revival,
and so on. Meanwhile, the work of destruction continues apace. Although the
world's tempo has been immensely quickened, the crisis in human thought and the
distress in human life did not come upon us suddenly. There were forebodings,
warnings, precursors, and indications.
252
The potentialities for moral evil which lay
until lately within the world crisis would, if realized, have maleficently
determined the worldly and spiritual fate of humanity for generations to come.
This terrible possibility has only partially been averted by the defeat of the
demon-obsessed Nazi leaders. The victory which came to the Allies was a physical
one. It must also be completed by a mental one. For the seeds of greed, hatred,
falsehood, and envy which the Nazis spread through the five continents are being
further spread by the Communists. Violence and hatred have flared up anew and
thus given the evil forces a fresh chance to destroy mankind.
253
So many men and women were forced to ask
themselves why they had fallen into such a horrible situation. Such
self-questioning, if done coolly and impartially, might have prepared the way
for a better reception of philosophical views. One of its results would be that
they were painfully aroused to their spiritual impoverishment. For the mere
coming of war revealed the failure of the old order of thought.
254
Only when the war forcibly parted many of them
from most of their possessions, both animate and inanimate, did they even begin
to become aware of the tragic instability and transiency of earthly life.
255
The shattering events of war and its aftermath
smashed some of religion's supports and weakened taste for metaphysical ideas.
Values which were necessary to ethics were lost.
256
The sufferings of war did not have a morally
purifying effect on all people but only on some people. On others they had a
morally degenerating effect - on profiteers, for instance, and on those who
sought relief in a lower sensualism than they had hitherto known. Again, if the
war ennobled some soldiers with sacrificial ideals it brutalized others with
violent instincts. Consequently, there are now two general groups, one which has
advanced spiritually and one which has worsened spiritually. If the first is
readier to accept such ideas, the second is readier to reject them. The position
with which we are thus faced at the opening of peace is somewhat confused.
257
Since World War II the Orient as a whole has
been moving away from its spiritual traditions and sources at a speed far more
accelerated than the prewar one.
258
The realism of the terrible war conditions
cannot therefore be without effect upon the character of the present writings.
At least these conditions have moved us to bring down to earth the loftiest
flights of thought, they have compelled us to insist upon all reflection having
a practical bearing upon life, and they have made us recognize the duty of
improving the physical surroundings of men no less than the more important duty
of improving their minds.
259
The so-called peace is full of tensions: it is
an armed truce.
260
The glamour of war-born idealism has gone. The
apathy of peace-born realism has replaced it. Humanity has not generated a new
incentive nor worked consciously for its own betterment.
261
During the war many men and women found stimulus
to self-sacrifice and contact with an ideal but after the war they lost both.
262
Those who learned the spiritual lessons of this
war by the time peace arrived were able to profit by mystical presences which
manifest themselves. But those who missed these lessons have to share the
responsibility for the further troubles which are occurring to themselves
individually and to humanity collectively.
263
If the war has not matured their attitudes
towards life, its agony has not been productive.
264
Fear and suspicion are filling the minds of
whole nations in this postwar world, robbing the individual of whatever little
peace of mind he had left.
265
World War II has forced the speed and
strengthened the thoroughness with which inevitable changes in our personal
lives must be carried through. This terrible, ghastly fact of World War II
towers above everything. It is teaching us all better than any book. But alas,
its lessons are negative. It cannot teach us what really IS. How petty are so
many aims amid the unfolding of this gigantic world-drama.
266
The separation of the human ego from its divine
principle has reached its utmost depth in our time. Hence we have witnessed,
both in Nazi propaganda and in Nazi atrocities, an evil never before known. But
the evolutionary working is causing an abrupt about-turn. The moment is ripe for
the beginning of a new trend towards the attainment of the Overself
consciousness.
267
The problem of how to keep moral integrity in a
morally corrupting world has grown harder after the war, and not easier.
268
The fortunes of religious faith will not be
geographically equal. In the democratic countries which fought for moral ideals
and emerged victorious from the struggle, such faith will grow strongly and
widely, whereas in the Axis countries which met with defeat, it will grow weakly
and sparsely.
269
If some people have become more spiritual and
others more sensual because of their wartime experiences, there are still others
who have become more selfish. The war has lowered their ethical standard and
increased their envy, greed, and malice.
270
Their faith has been unsettled but it has not
found anything new to rest on.
271
How few people are really teachable? What has a
decade of suffering taught humanity? The war is now a memory but millions of men
and women are exchanging fresh illusions for old ones, millions of others are
sharing bitter disillusions without any deep understanding of them.
272
There is one group which, tutored by horrible
sin, has found that life is not what sentimentality-based religion led it to
suppose, and another group which, tutored by horrible suffering, has found that
it is not what progress-worshipping materialism led it to suppose.
273
The "peace" has become a breeding ground of
moral despair and emotional resentment, of political chaos and spiritual
degeneration.
274
We have only to take note of the ill-will and
ill-feeling everywhere present to discover how greatly the past war and the
present crisis have lowered the moral temperament of humanity.
275
In the war period, when millions were overborne
by sorrow and loss and fear, the quest's practical worth in conferring inner
serenity and outer courage justified it.
276
War tests character and reveals how far it has
grown or how far it has degenerated. If the crisis smashed illusions and
uncovered weaknesses, it also showed up surprising goodwill and revealed
unsuspected latent strength. Even the horror and tragedy of this period left a
train of effects not altogether bad. The comfortable inertia and prewar
halfheartedness of the people Hitler disturbed, joined with the stimulus of
opposition to him, roused some of their own latent forces into fresh activity
and shocked them into the striving for their ideals. As the war proceeded they
came to see that they must change their approach to many other problems too.
They became conscious of other sins of omission - such as the economic and
social. They began to think and talk of a better world which must be built after
the war. Their triumph will consist not only in this but also in preserving the
ethical values which the Nazis lost. If war came as the world's karma, its
bloodshed suffering and destruction b rought some mental illumination to those
who responded to it rightly. Through such tribulations properly endured, the
character of mankind begins to be purged and merely selfish motives to desert
them. The new ideals which have passed through such pains of travail are
themselves the heralds of a brighter, happier, and wiser new age of world
history that will manifest itself in the not-too-distant future.
277
The close of war also closed Europe's lordship
over the rest of the world. Her grand cycle has ended. The future is not with
her. She has been exhausted by the effort of war and distracted by its aftermath
of internal conflict. The political, economic, mechanical, and cultural
initiatives of modern civilization are already falling from her faltering old
hands and being picked up by young and vigorous hands. This is due, in part, to
much of the best character and capacity from Europe being drawn off and
collected in America.
278
The disappointments of this postwar era, which
was expected to bring an era of peace but has brought only more threats of war,
have turned more and more Europeans to seek comfort or guidance in religion,
mysticism, or philosophy. This is noticeable in several countries but especially
in England, France, Germany, Denmark, and Holland.
279
That the observance of religious practices
largely declined before the war was a notorious fact. Their revival during the
war should not have its real character mistaken. Suffering men and women felt
the urgent need of religious support during the war's tensions. In many cases it
has led to a durable conversion. But with the tensions relaxed, they feel the
need of a more discriminating conversion. If they are to enter a period of
spiritual seeking, this will be all the more reason for being somewhat wary of
the spiritual offerings that will make their appearance. The new era is bringing
new religious ideas, new spiritual attitudes. Many of them are valuable and
constructive but others are wildly false and useless. Therefore critical
judgment and not indiscriminate acceptance is needed here. Religio-mystic cults
will have their vogue but will help us only to the extent that they are sound
and balanced.
280
How much faith will remain in the sequence,
after war and postwar upheaval, is yet to be seen. But of this we may be sure:
that through this titillating process and its own wartime sufferings, postwar
religion will become purer, truer, and more accommodating to modern needs. The
toiling masses usually have little time for prayer and devotion, and still less
time for mystical meditation and metaphysical study, so organized religion is a
necessary way of taking care of their spiritual needs. In the fellowship of
occasional public worship and through the sacramental means of grace, their
emotions are uplifted, their hearts consoled.
281
The same churches which were filled during the
nerve-shattering tensions of war, are being emptied by the softer relaxations of
peace; the entangled superstitions, illusions, and exploitations which the
converts had to accept hastily along with their reborn trust in God are
beginning to dissolve, partly as an aftermath of the dissolution of wartime
dangers or urgencies and partly as a consequence of the resurgence of a cooler,
more discriminating judgement. The great spiritual revival which so many
expected as the result of this latest war has not materialized. It is saddening
to observe that so vast a flood of wartime misery and suffering flowed over
humanity only to leave so little a mark of spiritual arousal behind it.
282
An important consequence of the inner
significance of the war is that the external onset of peace marked the beginning
of a new struggle. The unseen forces of darkness and enlightenment naturally
re-arrayed themselves and re-aligned their supporters again inside all countries
soon after peace had removed the former dangers which threatened them. The
military victory has not concluded the war but only brought about a change in
the external character of the conflict. The planet once more became a
battleground between two rival attitudes, the stubbornly materialistic and the
spiritually decent. The first will fight hard for domination, the second will
enter the last trench and will defend itself and its future. At first it is
assuming in most countries the aspect of nothing worse than a bloodless
political strife. Yet it will be none the less bitter for all that, its later
developments none the less bloodier. For all those who through selfish desire or
materialistic miscomprehension wish to cling to the dying age and to resist the
coming age of new ideas and a better life for mankind, the war's lessons will
again have been of little avail. They will consequently have to bear the bitter
karma which such resistance must necessarily generate.
283
What happened in the two years following the
war's end decisively influenced what would happen in the next twenty years.
284
The outbreak of war, as well as the course which
it took, led humanity into self-revelation, both individually and collectively.
It forced millions, who were formerly satisfied with the pleasanter mere
frivolities of life, to confront the grimmer and uglier realities of life.
Problems which, through inertia or selfishness, individuals and nations did not
want to face, were brought forcibly to the surface. The war widened men's
outlooks, liberated them from narrow prejudice, offered the chance to expand
their limited experience, correct their imperfect judgements and teach them what
peace-time had never taught them. It could have awakened many out of their
narrowness and widened their horizons and stretched their attitudes, but the
chance was not taken. This terrible ordeal, by breaking up crystallized forms
and weakening selfish organizations, gave a greater freedom to human
intelligence to exercise itself and to new ideals to express themselves. But was
this freedom properly used?
285
All this war and crisis offers a moral challenge
to humanity, a last chance to choose the right road. Yet many have failed to
perceive this and have "escaped" into sensualism and materialism. But it is only
a false escape. Those to whom that great struggle was but a temporary
inconvenience, who looked forward to a return backward to so-called normal
times, are deaf to the twentieth century's voice, and blind to its significance.
They may be too stubborn to learn its moral lessons, as they were too stupid to
learn the lessons of the previous peace. They may try to resist them, but they
will needlessly suffer.
286
The war mentality arising out of the killing
instinct did not disappear with the proclamation of peace. The immense spiritual
danger with which it menaced humanity did not end with the ending of war.
287
The evil forces which have inspired Nazism have
been defeated. But the defeat is not irretrievable. The military victory was
essential but the mental victory will now be no less essential.
288
As in those momentous days that preceded the
declaration of the war which it was a moral duty to wage against Nazi
wickedness, so in these fateful days which have followed the declarations of
peace, the situation in which humanity finds itself driven by the course of
events offers it a choice of two alternatives. Two roads open up before it and
each leads in a very different direction. Upon which of these diverging ways it
is now taking depends whether it is going to rise or fall spiritually, no less
than whether it is going to experience more prosperity or more poverty, ultimate
war or peace. When war and crisis have so crushed humanity that its hopes have
almost completely vanished and its outlook almost wholly blackened, it seeks
sordid forgetfulness in drink and sensuality or noble relief in religion and
mysticism. Thus the future of one large section is moral collapse and of another
section, moral uplift. The confused postwar generation is being divided into two
groups. The first comprise s those people who are going down and becoming worse.
This group, being more sensual and material, are becoming more brutalized, more
addicted to violence. The second comprises those people who are going up and
becoming better. Those who are only just entering it look for a guiding faith,
an inspiring leadership, to enable them to rid themselves of uncertainties and
futilities. Time will henceforth increasingly develop their character and
aspirations. The world-crisis has brought about the first stirrings of
spirituality in the hearts of these people. But to clarify and intensify these
feelings, some time will be needed.
289
It is questionable whether humanity has learned
enough from its ordeal in the last war and the present crisis. Since its return
to a more spiritual outlook is foreordained, it may have to be accomplished at
the price of a third world war.
290
The Mind back of things has not allowed the
discovery of the atom bomb to be made just at this particular time without
sufficient reason for doing so. Humanity is being prepared for the next fated
move in its inner life. And that is a lessening of selfish materialism, an
increasing of spiritual co-operation. The instrument used is a physical one
though the net result will include a psychological one. Only if the fear
generated by the unprecedented danger of this discovery attains such a
tremendous magnitude that it overwhelms all other base emotions, is it likely to
lead to the unshakeable determination to make the fresh moral start that is
needed. The method of persuasion has changed radically. Where the spiritual
teachers have failed to bring home their lessons to humanity, the atomic bomb
may do so. It has forced these alternatives upon us: either the nations of the
world must change their moral attitude towards each other or they must
annihilate each other.
291
The atom bomb leaves no alternatives between
self-reform and self-annihilation. Humanity's situation is critical urgent and
grave. For human attitudes must be changed, and changed quickly. Yet human
feelings are unprepared unwilling and unready to make this change.
292
Where the inner attitude of goodwill is lacking,
there no real success can be achieved in the estrangement of war.
293
We were told the possession of nuclear bombs
would act as a deterrent against aggression. But it could only be a temporary
one. For arms races usually end in collisions, which themselves end in war.
294
Where are the purified characters, the ennobled
minds, which have come out of the past two world wars? They exist, of course,
but only as individuals. In the mass, more people were brutalized, more lost
their faith in ideals and ethics than kept it. A third world war could produce
only a still greater and graver deterioration. This is why the cause of peace
must be helped - now, while there is yet time.
295
No nuclear war can be a righteous war. Its
support can only be contrary to Christian ethics and its consequence to human
welfare. It is evil, and nothing, no cause and no situation, can make it good.
296
They must recognize the fact that the only way
to stop wars is the change of heart and mind from the state which breeds them.
297
It will be a war not merely for the triumph of
one empire against another, but in reality a desperate struggle for the survival
of true civilization, which would necessarily include the survival after the
war.
298
It is astonishing that the terrifying peril into
which the manufacture of atomic bombs has plunged the fate of mankind, brings
from most people little more response than apathy.
299
If a nuclear war - so far unknown - should
happen in our time and leave as its aftermath most of mankind dead and much of
the planet devastated, nobody should complain about such a result. Everybody had
years of warning but its deterrent effect was too small against immense
stupidity, indifference, cruelty, short-sightedness, and wishful thinking.
Neither the memory of past agonies (in two world wars) nor the imaginary picture
of coming ones would then have been strong enough to teach us the dreadful
lesson.
300
There is always a formula less costly than war
if men of goodwill try to find it.
301
World war is not at any time a rigid preordained
fatal inevitability, but only a probability.
302
The striking way in which the modern world is
moving toward its doom is not accidental but predetermined. Yet this terrible
inevitability is not imposed from without by arbitrary power. It arises from
within, from the world's own characteristics.
303
During the First World War, a sex-ridden
civilization which had sought intense pleasures found intense pain. Did it learn
the implicit lesson? No! It plunged more wildly than ever in the quest of sexual
joy, only to find still worse agony in the Second World War. The more it has
wasted the gift of life, semen, the more it has lost the essence of life, blood.
Semen is white blood. Nature has punished man's careless dissipation of the one
with a forced loss of the other. The time has come to teach the lesson of sexual
responsibility in clear words. If humanity refuses to learn and obey spiritual
laws, the horror of a third world war, compared with which the second will be
mere child's play, cannot be escaped.
304
It would be agreeable and pleasant to share such
optimism about the non-inevitableness of war, but it would also be
self-deceptive.
305
The year-and-a-half after Hitler disappeared
brought the chance to make a new world or else the probability of having to
prepare for a new world war.
306
When the terrors and horrors of one war fail to
have the effect of arousing people to thinking for themselves instead of in a
mass, that is to say, of seeking truth individually, then the war will repeat
itself again and again.
307
If the war comes, it will have been brought by
the erring nations upon themselves. If the war is not to come, they must change
their ideas and their actions now.
308
Some believe that war might come in a few years'
time; it might also come in only one year's time; but it would be folly to deny
that it might not even come at all.
309
If no efforts at all had been made on
both the physical and mystical planes to counteract the threatened
conflict, it could have broken out in the Cuban crisis year. The situation is
still an anxious one but it is not a hopeless one. Piety alone will not suffice
to meet it, just as politics alone has already failed to do so. But the mystical
efforts are being kept up. War is not inevitable. No one knows the outcome of
the tremendous struggle going on between the atheistic hate forces and the
constructive love forces on the mental level. The intercessory and contributory
meditations of a few knowledgeable sages afford whatever real hope exists today.
If the peoples and leaders fail to respond to those contributions, they will
then have to carry the responsibility for its destruction.
310
It is folly not to see that war is inevitable,
folly to blind oneself deliberately to what is coming merely because one dreads
it.
311
While our human interest and nature shudder at
the thought of such war, our human wisdom and insight have no doubt it will take
place.
312
The danger is not only that a third world war
will come, but that it will come during the old age even of those who reached
manhood in the first world war.
313
None of the wars which mankind have hitherto
suffered was Armageddon, for the last war was fought out fully and extended its
devastations only in three continents and partly on the fourth, but the fifth
was not affected in the same way. When Armageddon comes, it will devastate all
five continents.
314
The mass of people does not take to truly
spiritual concepts. Extroversion, egoism, and preoccupation with personal or
worldly affairs keep out any interest or attention in such concepts. Only the
crushing shock of atomic war will provide an impulsion toward them from without.
315
Even the new polarization of attitudes which is
emerging as a consequence of the war, is confused rather than clear-cut. The
ghastly tragedy of this confusion would show itself at its very worst in
Armageddon. In the Second World War the issues between good and evil were
clear-cut and easily discernible. But in the third world war they would be
confused, chaotic, and mixed.
316
It does not require much perceptiveness to
perceive the inevitability of Armageddon. This fear haunts millions today and is
one of the impulsions to the search for spiritual comfort, in one group, and the
search for forgetfulness in pleasures, with the larger group.
317
We may face the tragic inevitability of a third
world war with fear and gloom or with calm and resignation.
318
Politicians do not seek, and do not find, the
real issues behind the apparent ones: this is one of the reasons why their very
remedies merely cover up the causes, and repress only the symptoms. The time
comes when what is evaded comes also to the surface and must be faced, when the
illusions can no longer be hidden, when the chronic accumulated toxins break out
all over the body politic, bringing severe troubles, maladies, and sickness.
319
So long as those who lead nations or rule
peoples have wholly or partially inadequate understanding of the profounder
significance of human existence, so long will those nations and peoples be led
from one painful blunder to another.
320
This postwar world is hard to live in. We are
paying the price for the visionless selfishness, the voracious greeds, and the
stupid materialism of the past decades. It was for us to become aware of the new
undercurrents of thought and feeling and to become conscious of their import. If
we failed to do so it was because our intuition needed improvement. The
distressing record during the past two decades of a leadership which lacked both
realism and idealism partly explains the inevitability of this war. The blind
incompetent and materialistic men who helped to write this record hugged their
errors and deluded themselves into looking for the foe everywhere but in their
own minds. The world is in such grim chaos because it has had materialistic
leaders and no spiritual leadership.
321
Mankind cannot be fashioned in actuality into
goodness or wisdom overnight - let alone the godlike exemplary image of which
scripture speaks. Not even the most powerful adept can do that. Much of the
preaching, most of the idealistic teaching, is hardly relevant to the human
situation as we find it in the world today. Only clear thinking, and even
clearer non-thinking intuition, can see the picture, not only as it is, but also
in its wholeness. Without some knowledge of the World-Idea, those who hold
public office, those who lead their countries, merely grope their way under the
delusion that they see it. This does not mean that knowledge of this truth
provides all the needed and perfect solutions of the problems. The egoistic
attitudes and blindnesses, the narrownesses, the greeds, hates, prejudices,
animosities, passions, and violent emotions of the people would still continue
to block the way and obstinately obstruct the wisest and best of leaders,
creating a karma that will have to o perate, a destiny that brings back what is
put forth. This is not to say that a fine leader's presence and power are as
nothing; they mitigate the bad effects of mankind's own past making, and they
initiate new constructive efforts which will penetrate the future.
322
The few statesmen, rulers, or politicians by
whose decisions history itself is now being made, who control tremendous power,
are the ones who need guidance and wisdom, prophetic warning and personal
awakening if they are not to lead their nations - and with them all mankind -
into the abyss of colossal catastrophe. If anything is to be done to save the
world, it must be done through them - the masses of men will be more likely to
follow where they go. If you say that the problem is too big for anyone to
solve, you imply that nothing ought to be done to help these leaders find right
direction. If you say, with Aldous Huxley's Grey Eminence, that "mystics
who interfere in politics only make matters worse," I reply that unpractical
visionaries, unbalanced fanatics, narrow sectarians, and inexperienced meddlers
certainly do so, but practical, balanced, and mature mystics do not. History
proves this point. Philosophy rejects both objections. Even where there is only
a sma ll hope of avoiding the tragic outcome of present conditions, it must take
the chance offered.
323
When monsters devoid of human pity, inspired by
terrifying hate, become leaders of a people, and are followed by them, the
presence of the dark opposing principle in nature becomes very evident.
324
The fact is that a situation has arisen for
which the military leaders are totally unprepared, one which was never foreseen
in all their courses in strategy and tactics, and before which the political
leaders also are bewildered.
325
In former times, compromise was a prudent and
practical proposition. But in our time it will not succeed. The leaders of
humanity must either adjust themselves to truth or find themselves, and their
nations, smitten with disaster or catastrophe.
326
The makers of war cannot alter themselves
suddenly into the makers of peace. It is useless to look to politics for the
cessation of strife when it is itself based on strife. It is wiser and more
logical to look to those who have found their own inner peace.
327
The need of a twentieth-century sage to guide
twentieth-century people is plain. For people are seeking truth and yearn for
happiness where it never has been and never can be found - that is, in
materialistic thinking and selfish living.
328
The extent to which any single man is able to
force world events today is small. Unseen forces of universal law are, on the
contrary, using gifted individuals to control, influence, and fulfil the destiny
of mankind.
329
No leader will appear to set the whole world in
order for no man has any other answer that will be more effective than the
Golden Rule, which mankind has known since before Jesus' days but failed to
apply. If such a man is to be more successful he will have to demonstrate more
spiritual Power.
330
The people who compose a community and the
leaders whom they follow make its character as good or as bad as they themselves
are. Only wild fanatics can expect to build a perfect society out of imperfect
materials.
331
When the name of democracy is used as a shield
to destroy democracy - while claiming its freedom - it is ridiculous to play the
simpleton and ignore the reality of what is actually happening.
332
By using wrong methods, or even by using right
methods at the improper time, the leaders of a nation attain the very opposite
of what they strive for. It is for this reason that today the search after peace
is bringing them farther from it. A very old Far Eastern text, the Book of
Changes, declares, "If the military defense of a state is carried to such
extreme that it provokes wars which annihilate the state, there is failure."
333
If the rulers do not respond to this last chance
which has been offered them, they will not be given another. For there is a
limit to the length of karmic rope which keeps the nations in an uneasy peace.
But if they do respond to the warning uttered and accept the counsel offered,
help will come - miraculous and abundant help. For if there is no tragedy graver
than the tragedy of such rejected Grace, there is equally no blessing happier
than the blessing of accepted Grace.
334
Too many of history's great leaders were at the
same time mankind's great misleaders. For they took too many people down the
easy but evil path of violence, which revealed destruction and dealt out death
at its end.
335
A few months before he was murdered, at the end
of that terrible period of Hindu-Muhammedan riotings, anarchy, and massacre,
Gandhi exclaimed: "I do not want to live in darkness and madness; I cannot go
on."
336
The dictator, the politician, and the journalist
must take part of the responsibility for leading the masses to this lugubrious
situation.
337
It would be a mistake to believe that salvation
in any crisis depends on a quantitative element. Humanity could be helped by
only a handful of men who found and lived in the higher consciousness, provided
it were willing to follow the guidance and respect the enlightenment of these
men.
338
If it were not for the presence of a few human
lights in our world, and for their mostly silent but sometimes open activity,
that world would have deteriorated spiritually, morally, to an extent far below
what it has done.
339
Mankind has entered a new cycle, one wherein
each man must learn something of the truth for himself. In former cycles he did
not need to bear this responsibility. In the present one, he must accept it.
340
A time like the present should not be used as an
excuse to escape into the past but as an inspiration to bring in the future.
341
The economic and political reconstruction of the
world is a vitally important task, but its ethical reconstruction is
immeasurably more important. The former touches the surface of life only, the
latter touches its very core.
342
While our mental attitude remains what it is, no
solution is possible. We meet hatred with hatred, suspicion with suspicion, fear
with fear. Even nuclear disarmament would only ease the world's crisis and not
end it, would only put off the urgency and acuteness and still leave the problem
of enmity where it is. Among the ancients, Indian Buddha, Chinese Lao Tzu, and
Syrian Jesus gave their solution. Buddha explained the operation of a higher law
when he pointed out, "Hatred ceases not by hatred but by love." And the Western
world has heard often enough (but does not practise) what Jesus taught on this
matter.
343
The philosopher must look very far into human
history and very deep into human nature when seeking the ultimate sources of
human error and human wrong-doing. He must look farther than their social,
economic, and political courses. This done, he will trace them to the
animalistic instincts inherited from pre-human and primitive human incarnations.
As long as these instincts remain undisciplined, and as long as the higher
nature is not more eagerly cultivated, so long must we expect to witness the
strife which produces war - whether between nations or inside them. It is quite
proper to make the necessary remedial efforts through social, political,
educational, organizational, and other means, but their benefits will disappear
in the end if they are not made side by side with the effort to teach the
necessity of liberation from these instincts by the appropriate mental and
spiritual techniques. The more numerous the individuals who can find peace and
joy inside their own hearts, the more wi ll the dangers and horrors which
threaten mankind be curbed.
344
There is no perpetual peace anywhere on this
planet, only perpetual strife. But it is open to man to take the violence, the
murder, and the war out of this strife. He may purge it of its savage beast
qualities.(P)
345
The greatest spiritual needs of the modern world
are more depth and more width. It needs to deepen its field of consciousness so
as to include the true spiritual self and the divine laws governing life. It
needs to widen out into loving thoughts and compassionate deeds. With right
ethical ideals and sound nonmaterialistic ideas the external activities which
will fill the postwar stage would then bring true progress to mankind. But with
unworthy ideals and false ideas humanity would only fall into greater disaster
and eventual destruction.
346
Without knowing the real and hidden causes of
the malady of war, we cannot find the real and lasting cure of war.
347
The great Cuban crisis of 1962 resulted in a
situation which brought about a postponement of the menace of World War III, but
did not, fully and finally, avert it. All efforts to obtain peace may succeed or
not succeed - the results are variable - but any effort to establish peace
permanently cannot possibly do so fully and finally until the human race comes
into a larger obedience to the higher spiritual laws.
348
If philosophy can do nothing for the peace of
the world, then it is worth nothing. But it can do something. Indeed, if
the politicians and militarists would recognize its inner worth, its private
firsthand knowledge of the higher laws, it could redeem civilization from the
evils and horrors of war.
349
We may find any number of excellent arguments
against war. We may demonstrate conclusively that war as a process for achieving
national aggrandizement is now entirely unnecessary, because applied science has
opened the way for every nation to increase its wealth many times. But if
arguments alone were sufficient to convince rulers, then war would have
disappeared when the first flood of League propaganda was sluiced out on the
world. The fact is that something more than the appeal to reason is required,
for man contains passions, prejudices, greeds, and fears also.
350
You must batter down the barriers which wall in
your view of life. You must stop thinking in terms of your own country alone.
You must learn that the frontiers of England, of America, of India, lie far
beyond England, beyond America, and beyond India. You must open out your
philosophical horizon and bring your thinking up to date. Know that this century
demands that the Indian peasant learn that his fate is inextricably bound up
with the fate of the British factory worker, and both with that of the American
trader.
351
When chaos and disorder, violence and
materialism become widespread, the spiritual forces reassert themselves, restate
the truth, and inspire a renewal of faith, religion, and mysticism.
352
A society which is based on a hierarchy of
wealth, position, appearance, and worldly skill is unbalanced and cannot
function properly or healthily or fully. It must look deeper and add inner
spiritual correspondences to these things.
353
The political conferences to prevent or end war
appear ridiculous; they are foredoomed from the start: selfishness and
insincerity render them futile.
354
The hope for a lasting peace - so often
unrealized - can become satisfied but only by looking for it in a new direction
- within.
355
The world situation is very unpromising.
Humanity has not learned as much as it ought to have learned from its terrible
sufferings of recent years. Or, as in certain countries, it has even learned the
wrong lessons and become more selfish, more brutal and violent, and more
unco-operative. There is no escape, no new shortcut through political or
economic change out of the chaos in which the nations find themselves, other
than the oldest one in history - which is to avoid evil, to do good, to believe
in God and the moral laws.
356
The deplorable state of the world today
testifies silently to the widespread spiritual ignorance which is at the root of
the trouble. Class hates class, group strives against group, selfishness is
prevalent everywhere - this situation could only arise amongst creatures
ignorant of the higher purpose on this earth. Consequently, to help make
available knowledge of the truth and to elevate moral character constitute the
noblest task to which any man could devote himself.
357
The way of arbitration - like the way of
contractual treaties - for the purpose of avoiding war presupposes a loyal
respect for promises and a level of simple honesty, an expression of obligations
in deeds rather than oratory which, we know now from painful experience, does
not exist in imperfect humanity. It is merely wishful dreaming to propose it as
the practical alternative to war. The brutal realities of our situation have to
be squarely seen without illusion. Nor is the bringing of the system of military
naval and air defense to ever-increasing magnitude an effectual alternative. The
same procedure is sure to be followed in the opposite camp. The result one day
in some moment of emotional reaction to tragedy or of national cupidity will be
an explosion of all these massed and concentrated engines of violence.
358
Sloppy sentiments about human brotherhood are
not at all needed to pad out the plain fact that all of us ought to work with
goodwill for the general good.
359
The dark possibility that destroys our future
can give place to a brighter one only when enough philosophically illumined
people are to be found in each country. Nor need they be many - a few in each
city would throw out enough influence to bring about this change. It is the
tragedy of our age that philosophical thoughts should be classed with idle
dreams when they are the most practical of all today.
360
The present situation shows the utter failure of
religion to control men; it will never be more than a temporary palliative;
TRUTH alone can solve all national and international problems as much as it
solves the personal ones. But truth is based on intelligence and mankind's
intelligence still lags remarkably behind. So the adepts contribute their little
bit towards enlightening others and wait with the terrible patience of those who
think in terms of aeons, not years alone. The growth of intelligence will come
through evolution, and then man will learn his personal responsibility for all
deeds under the laws of re-embodiment and compensation; later he will learn that
he cannot separate himself from the ALL, that the same Mind runs through us all,
and that humanity is just a big family wherein the older members are
responsible for the welfare of the younger ones, the rich for the poorer, and so
on. Universal compassion will then be the only right outlook for a properly
educated man. Wh ere would Hitler's crude racial separatism or Russia's equally
crude hatred of the bourgeoisie be then?
361
This divine consciousness dissolves inveterate
prejudice and removes embittered passion. But no human will can manufacture it.
The world must acknowledge a higher authority than fleshly desire and evolve by
self-striving beyond its present materiality before the Overself's grace will
confer such an exalted state.
362
Without trying to indulge in overoptimistic
claptrap, it may nevertheless be predicted that, as the twenty-first century
advances, human life will change both physically and culturally in an astounding
way.
It is true that no particular war can possibly end all war. It is the untamed animal in man which causes all his personal fights, tribal aggressions, and national wars. It is the spiritual nature of man which urges him to live peaceably and harmoniously with his fellows. That man can rid himself of external bloodshed without troubling to rid himself of its internal causes within himself, is one of his intellect-born illusions. It may be kept at a distance for a longer time than before but it cannot be kept there permanently while the passions of hatred, anger, and greed thrive in his heart. But it is also true that his instruments of collective violence have now become so destructive, so terrible, and so cruel that their very results are forcing him to contemplate abandoning such violence altogether, and to turn towards peaceful discussion for the settlement of his disputes. Human conflict has reached its most violent expression in this war [WWII] of staggering planetary dimensions and unheard -of scientific destructiveness. But it helped to quicken the dawn of a day when the soldier's sword and the airman's bomb will be found only in such places as the "Chamber of Horrors" at Madam Tussaud's Museum in London. Such extreme violence was an evolutionary necessity to convince him that he must cease to tolerate war, that he must find a more refined - that is, more mental - method of carrying on his struggles, that he must come into the consciousness of world citizenship, and that he must create international institutions commensurate with such a broader consciousness.
Such thoughts have begun to circulate within his consciousness, but they will circulate forcibly only whilst the horrors of the last war are still easily remembered. It would be wiser and prudent to realize that a long night must precede this full dawn. A fresh generation or two will not feel the force of this remembrance, and then passions which breed war may overcome it and prove stronger than whatever mechanical organization to preserve itself society may have brought into being for its self-protection. This is so because sustained thought is creative and returns to us, in part, in the events which meet us as we travel through life. Nevertheless, we have indeed started to move onward and upward to that degree of ethical maturity which shall surely come when we shall have controlled these passions sufficiently to fight our quarrels around a conference table and not on a battlefield and which shall transform history from a record of national warfare into a record of international welfar e.
Is it really a paradox that the first practical step in forging an armour for such self-protection against war must necessarily be a moral and not a physical one? There must be deep unflinching sincerity behind the will for peace. We yearn for a war-proof world; but when we come to consider the practical means of protecting mankind from further wars, we shall discover that insofar as they are not counterweighted with ethical principles and psychological understanding also, they may become as dangerous to us through creating a false sense of safety as the old League of Nations became for a similar reason. One of the half-conscious tasks which destiny placed in the war's hands was to show the world's face to itself. In the result it unmasked a gargoyle before an affrighted audience. For instance, when Hitler denounced the League of Nations as a humbug, we turned our ears away. Yet he was not wrong as he was not quite right. For those who know what really went on behind its public conferences and pleasant speeches, know also that too much unscrupulous intrigue, political greed, and ethical insincerity were covered by its fine verbal facade of idealism and morality. The closure of Suez and its withdrawal of oil would have brought Mussolini's Ethiopian adventure, for instance, to an abrupt close. But this needed a sincerity which was lacking. The betrayals of Manchuria to Japan, of Ethiopia to Italy, and of Czechoslovakia to Germany were lapses in international morality whose consequences ruined the League. Its ethical failure was inevitably followed by its physical failure.
Not that the basic conception of a League of Nations was a bad one; on the contrary, it was magnificent! But it was one thing to invent machinery to check the outbreak of war and quite another to find the mental outlook large enough to work such machinery. For the new institution itself did not change their old outlook. Geneva witnessed both the birth of a great idea and the death of a grand hope. The League perished because it put heads together but not hearts. It was to be expected that a machine of the character of the League of Nations would work badly at first, but it was not expected that it would ignominiously fail to work at all. Only a few anticipated this failure. They were the few who comprehended that the mental reality behind a thing is more formidable and important than its material appearance, that the inevitable karma of so much past aggression, exploitation, cruelty, and selfishness could not be easily circumvented without a real change of heart.
The League of Nations was only an idea. It never came to life because it was never given the chance to do so. And it was never given the chance because each of its members thought of its own country first and the League second, because each brought its nationalistic interests right into the League chambers and kept them there as the foremost purpose of its presence, because none had the consciousness of really being what all pretended to be - a united commonwealth. We, however, have the splendid chance to make it something more than an idea. For most statesmen now realize that some kind of arrangement which will honestly carry out its task of preventing aggressive war and not merely talk about doing so, which will comprehend that the duty of stronger nations is to protect the weaker ones and not to exploit them, must paradoxically be one of the products of this terrible time. Thus Nazism, which was fundamentally opposed to the idea of a just peace, unwittingly and unwillingly contributed to its stabilization.
We must begin a new effort by realizing that the guns may stop shooting but this is not enough to make a peace. We need something more. We need a reconstructed society where the moral and physical causes which may ultimately set guns shooting again will themselves be liquidated. We must proceed by understanding that the historical and geographical accidents which divide one people from another, one class from another, one nation from another, have fostered dislike, suspicion, and even hatred in the past. The limited nationalistic outlook can no longer be accepted uncritically. The developments of modern scientific civilization have filled it with contradictions and imperfections, with dangers and inadequacies. In its prewar form it has become antiquated. It must now be revised and brought into line with postwar needs. Every major situation today is not only a national one but also an international one. Nations will have to broaden their outlook and give up some fraction of their nationalistic fervour not merely for the benefit of all but more so for their own individual benefit. And they will have to do this not only because the war's practical lessons have left them no alternative, but also because their moral evolution has left them no alternative. The necessity of curbing the power and authority of competitive nationality in the interests of international welfare is plain. Nazism and Fascism represented indeed in one aspect the last furious struggle of nationalism become aggressive and bellicose in an endeavour to save itself from impending and enforced limitation.
The animosities and prejudices, the rivalries and hatreds, of the old-fashioned nationalistic outlook must be replaced by the co-operative outlook of a new internationalism. Whether we like it or not, we are in the process of swiftly becoming a world community. The quicker we cut out the time-lag between the dissolution of our prejudices and the realization of our evolutionary needs, the less painful will it be. The sympathetic interest in foreign peoples, the feeling of connection with the wider human race, is something new in history but it is something which has come to stay. No continent can now afford to forget - as it has so often in the past - that it is a part of the same planet as the others. The great globe whose monstrous size frightened medieval minds has shrunk to a little ball which man now plays with. The war has taught more people more geography than any school ever did. This is not merely something to make us smile but also something to make us think. For it has fo rcibly brought home to them the fact that life today is an international affair, that they are being brought into ever-closer relations. We have to realize that we are approaching the middle of the twentieth century and not the middle of the eighteenth. Wireless, cable, telephone, steamer, railway, and printing press have made a new international relationship both necessary and possible but they have not yet made it actual.
The technological and commercial developments which have dissolved so many of the physical divisions in the present may be used, if we wish, to foster friendship, understanding, and goodwill in the future. The problems which have to be settled are now too large to be settled successfully on a prewar basis. A new international order must be instituted as being the only effective way to deal with them. Henceforth, the major events in every country must be looked upon as an integral and inseparable part of the planetary situation. The separate peoples are today too interdependent to carry on successfully with anything short of such an order. Every people is a part of a social organism and must share the general fate of that organism. If such a federation is still far off, it is near enough that a third world war will precipitate it overnight. For the difficulties of achieving it are really less than the difficulties into which another great war will plunge everybody. One must take a realistic vie w of the situation, yes, but one need not throw all one's idealism overboard to do it.
We have in the past enlarged the meaning of the word "patriotism" from a merely local to a tribal significance and then from a tribal to a national one. We must in the present enlarge it once again. It is no longer enough to be only Fiji Islanders or Frenchmen. We must also, and alongside of that, be world patriots. The political frontiers which separate one country from another separate them also from prosperity, peace, and advancement. The time will surely come one day to pull them down, when the United States of the World will come to birth as a single entity. The ultimate evolution will certainly be towards a universal humanity.
The immediate evolution is towards a consciousness that we are all human beings just as much as we are tribesmen or race members. This need not mean the total destruction of national sentiments and the total wounding of national vanities. It need not necessarily exclude an enlightened patriotism or a balanced devotion to a particular national or racial group. It would exclude, however, the hatreds, the prejudices, the dislikes, and the intolerant fanaticisms bred by false patriotism and narrow insularity. Just as a larger circle does not exclude the smaller concentric one contained within it, so loyalty to mankind as a whole need not exclude the lesser loyalties to race, creed, and class. What it does is to subordinate them. Each people could carry on its own autonomous existence and independent activities within the framework of an international association. The rights of freedom and self-rule need not be menaced by the broader rights of such an association. When the forms, interests, and arr angements of mankind become internationalized, the benefit will be moral as well as material. For group selfishness, false national pride, and racial prejudices will be forced down into second place behind human fellowship and common welfare. The administrative essentials of a fully developed new international order must consist of a world legislature, a world executive, and a world tribunal.
Most people are now much more ready for the widening in loyalties which world-order schemes would involve, but they are not at all as ready as they should be. Thus, they unnecessarily deprive themselves of the clear advantages of such an order and go on foolishly enduring the troubles of the old order. That we are moving toward some kind of single World Commonwealth is certain. That we are not emotionally ready for it is also certain. For the events and inventions which are pushing us forward are ahead of our ideas and ideals. The tragic needs of our time do not find a commensurate mentality to meet them. The Europeans, for example, cannot be persuaded to renounce their state sovereignties, cannot be made into common citizens of a frontierless continent against their will. How much more will this be the case with a world-citizenship scheme? But in the end humanity will find itself unable to keep the peace between its diversified groups without creating a separate paramount international associ ation - be it central, federal, or league. A world organization which can legally settle international disputes and which possesses the armed power to enforce its decisions or to resist aggressions cannot ultimately be avoided. Men, in their present stage of moral evolution, cannot be effectively governed without the use of some kind of physical coercion nor can their national disputes be settled without some means of physically enforcing decisions. The peoples are being evolved from within and driven from without to the point where only a world association will fit their political needs.
Such an authority would possess the usual administrative powers. First, it would be a legislature whose jurisdiction would extend over the whole field of international matters and regulate by agreed laws the political, commercial, and cultural relations between the States. Second, it would be a tribunal where final judgement would be pronounced upon disputes, aggressions, and alterations of frontiers. Third, it would be an executive equipped to maintain order and enforce laws actually worked out to preserve peace. But besides the necessity of preventing possible internecine wars the practical advantages of such a common authority are so obvious that the administrations of the otherwise independent units will sooner or later be forced by developments to accept it. Such advantages would include a customs union, a common currency, a common transport system, and probably a common armed force. But the danger here is that a paramount supranational power may develop into a tyrannous suprastate. It ma y be that adequate checks and safeguards can be devised by statesmen against it, but in the end it can be overcome only by overcoming the moral and mental defects in men which could cause it.
If men are not evolved enough to support such an ideal institution as a world family of democratic nations, they are not so low that they cannot support the beginnings of such an institution. If a nation is unwilling to be its neighbour's keeper, it ought at least be willing to be its neighbour's helper. It is inevitable that as men become more truly spiritually minded they will become more internationally minded. And this is certain to reflect itself in turn in their political systems. The end of such a process can only be the formation of an international commonwealth. Hence, every political measure which promotes this end is a right one and every measure which obstructs it is a wrong one. But it must be also well-timed or it will defeat its own end. The League was ill-timed. The right time for a solely regional scheme was after World War I. Instead, too much was attempted by way of the League, which inevitably failed. But after World War II a regional scheme alone would likewise fail. The p resent suggestion adapts itself to this factor of proper timing.
It was predicted in The Wisdom of the Overself that the principle of co-operation would be the only principle to emerge from all the postwar conferences as being effective enough to solve their thorny problems. It will have many possible spheres of application but the first and major one will be in the direction of peace. So we venture to predict again that failure of international co-operative action to create and sincerely to sustain some kind of an assembly of representatives drawn from the different nations, will lead directly to the catastrophe of a third armed conflict more terrible than this planet has yet known. It could lead to this in one and a half to two decades. Metropolitan cities would not be able to escape heavy bombing and wide destruction. Such an honest and determined assembly of nations would be better protection for every country than any army, navy, or air force.
The ultimate evolution of the twenty-first century will be toward a democratic world association, acting through an international parliament, an international tribunal, and an international executive, which would impartially regulate, coordinate, and boldly envelop the entire economic resources of the planet as a whole. When all nations can thus share equitably in the common wealth and productivity, one of the prime causes of war between them would completely vanish. Past events have tragically proved the truth of these statements. Many of the calamities such as monetary collapse, trade depression, and labour strikes which descended on classes, masses, and nations were caused by their failure to recognize the immense power of the principle of mutual help and by their inability to meet the events of this historic turning-point with the understanding they demand. The first nation to recognize the one and to meet the other will do much, not only for herself, but also for all other nations. Both m oral development and practical exigencies will require us in the end to subscribe to the fundamental truth that prosperity, no less than peace, is one and indivisible. But, unfortunately, we are not yet emotionally ready to climb such a height. We must expect, therefore, that different kinds of troubles will plague us from time to time as the penalty of ourunreadiness.
363
We have to accept the solid fact that men do not
change overnight, that starting new institutions and necessarily filling them
with the same old faces that we already know, will not and cannot bring about a
new world. Until we begin to recognize this and start working for new hearts and
new minds even more than for institutions, we shall not come near to solving our
problems.
364
Today, the mission of philosophy is a planetary
one, for truth is needed everywhere, and for the first time can be transmitted
everywhere. We speak here in terms of geographical fact, for vested religious
interests and totalitarian political despotisms still continue to serve their
masters, the darker forces of evil, by obstructing the contemporary planetary
enlightenment.
365
Unless humanity recognizes that demonic powers
are loose in its midst, are inspiring hatred violence suspicion and greed, it
will not go down on its knees to ask help from a power greater than and beyond
itself.
366
Unless we look behind the world's problems into
the real and spiritual problems which they reflect, we cannot properly
understand them or solve them.
367
The human situation which has emerged from the
cataclysms and anguish of war and crisis, still shows insufficient spiritual
awakening. And yet this awakening - and this alone - is the only instrument of
our salvation that is worth looking for because it is the only one which is not
doomed to be destroyed. All other instruments may be effective in ordinary
times, but we are living in exceptional times. Today they can offer only the
illusion of success or happiness with the actuality of failure or misery.
But so few people are fortunate enough to have the time, leisure, energy, and opportunity for spiritual culture, that the awakening from social lethargy is often the first sign of any awakening at all. The social awakening may nowadays be a troubled upheaval rather than a smooth progress. But human egoism and passion being what they are at the present evolutionary stage, this is inevitable. However, the awakening must be understood as the first part of a deeper awakening from spiritual slumber which is yet to come. We must see in all this social renovation a necessary preliminary and unavoidable preparation for the subsequent spiritual one. When the political, scientific, and economic reorganization of the world which is going on before our eyes culminates, when more settled conditions begin to prevail again, men will realize that materialism has brought them its best and worst. And realizing, they will turn to discovery of their inner needs. Therefore we may expect no general spiritual awaken ing in our own lifetime whilst this external new era is being established, but after that such an awakening will surely come because it is evolutionarily due. Thus there is room for both an optimistic and a pessimistic outlook; neither alone is quite true. If we look only at the next few years, there is gloom all around; but if we look through them to some decades farther ahead, there is light.
368
Those who believe in a sudden religio-mystical
revival to change mankind almost overnight, are far from philosophy. But still
they are only being foolish. Those however who not only believe this, but also
believe that it is they or their particular religious organization that will
help to bring about the revival, are also being self-conceited.
Just as the Germans were presented with the choice between Hitlerian revolution and democratic evolution as well as the chance of escaping a misery so much worse than the one Hitler offered to save them from, so humanity today has both choice and chance. The real decision is between obedience to a spiritual leading or denial of it.
With all too many people, both among the vanquished and the victors, everything within themselves remains as before the war. If anything, they are even spiritually emptier than before, because the negative feelings of bitterness, resentment, selfishness, suspicion, or violence have now taken hold of their hearts.
If we look the situation of contemporary humanity fully in the face, putting aside suggestion and propaganda, we shall have to confess that its salvation will never be brought about by the little mystical groups and large religious sects.
The "Kingdom of God on earth" is not a political concept but a personal one. Its realization will never be found outside but only inside the individual mind and heart.
369
The descent into materialism will be
intellectually checked by science reversing its own nineteenth-century
conclusions; the lapse into immorality by the vivid demonstration of its tragic
results in recent national and individual history; the fall into irreligion by
the uprise of a more personal and more mystical faith.
370
The first social goal which philosophy sets
before its votary is the dropping of class race and creed prejudices - not, be
it remembered, of their actualities. Although racial differences must be taken
into account, cultural variations must be recognized and the contrasts of living
standards must be noted; although the oneness of mankind is a metaphysical and
not a physical fact and although its mystical unity is not its practical
uniformity, all this is no excuse for racial prejudices and hatreds or for
unfair partialities and discriminations. In the case of the colour bar, this has
been particularly cruel in the past and will be dangerous in the future. He must
be too wise, too tolerant, and too decent to be caught up by the fanatic
nationalisms, the unashamed savageries, the battling brutalities, the social
hostilities, the racial animosities and religious intolerances of unenlightened
men. Whoever breathes the rarefied atmosphere of truth can only regard with
sorrow those who insist on breathing the murky fogs of overweening race
nationality sect or colour discriminations. Whoever practises the philosophic
discipline is walking the path to the consciousness of being a world citizen. He
cannot help but be a confirmed internationalist. This is a logical and practical
result of his knowledge and attitude. He sees clearly that we are all children
of the same supreme Father, all rooted in the same infinite Mind, all brought
together on this planet to carry out the same noble tasks of self-regeneration
and self-realization. Consequently he is friendly to men of all nationalities,
all races, all countries. They are not disliked suspected or hated, ignored
neglected or ill-treated because in the flesh they happen to be foreigners. He
sees that the truth is there are no Englishmen, Frenchmen, or Germans but only
human beings harbouring stuffy mental complexes that they are English French or
German. Nevertheless the man who has liberated himself from this fleshly materi
alism need not cease thinking of himself as a citizen of his particular country.
But he will alongside of that think of himself as a citizen of the world.
371
In devoting time to spiritual reform, we go to
the root of all other reforms. If men get rid of their spiritual ignorance it is
inevitable that they will more quickly get rid of undesirable conditions in
every other department of their life. Nowadays we must especially guard
ourselves against the one-sided unbalanced doctrines, the selfish degrading
ethos, and the false materialistic ideas which have so widely permeated the
political, cultural, commercial, and religious terrain of our time. No Marxian
magic and no financial wizardry can turn a planet peopled by men and women still
dominated by hates, greeds, selfishnesses, and lusts into a physical utopia.
Ultimately the experience of all history, both individual and national, teaches
the lesson that physical well-being alone is not enough. It contributes towards
the true happiness of man on earth but does not complete it. The welfare of the
body is not an end in itself but only a means to a higher end. Hence philosophy,
in its consideration o f the methods to be used to achieve such an end, says
that external re-arrangement of social forms will not of itself bring about
fully satisfactory results. A re-arrangement from within is equally if not much
more necessary.
372
Only those who refuse the lessons of mankind's
historic past can suppose that peace, which it has never had for more than short
periods, will suddenly bloom all over the earth and remain here continuously, in
defiance of the violent and destructive instincts which still lurk in mankind.
373
The opportunities to wage war can be brought
under international control by external means, and within our time they will be
so brought when mankind is driven by necessity to take such a measure for the
sake of the race's own survival. But the psychological causes that urge men to
wage war - these remnants of the animal left in man - can only be dealt with by
internal means.
374
This drawing-together of the different peoples
out of their earlier isolation, which modern civilization has brought about, has
not only increased their knowledge of each other but also increased their effect
upon the lives and fortunes of one another. Out of this has grown the complexity
of contemporary political, economic, and racial problems. What one nation does
is liable to affect not only its neighbours but also far-away nations to the
point of actual war. Therefore, there is much greater need of learning for what
purpose all the human race has been placed on this earth than there was in
earlier and more isolated times.
375
Not any military, political, or economic
preparation - whether defensive or aggressive - has any hope for mankind's true
protection, if it does not include learning and obeying these higher laws. There
are healing, restorative, guiding, and protective forces amid us even today,
trying to reach the human race and to penetrate the dense, dark conditions
surrounding it. If they are recognized and received in time, it will be saved
from a frightfully destructive event. But if human blindness and inertia prevent
this from happening, the penalty will have to be paid.
376
In the heart's deepest place, where the burden
of ego is dropped and the mystery of soul is penetrated, a man finds the
consciousness there not different in any way from what all other men may find.
The mutuality of the human race is thus revealed as existing only on a plane
where its humanness is transcended. This is why all attempts to express it in
political and economic terms, no less than the theosophic attempts to form a
universal brotherhood, being premature, must be also artificial. This is why
they failed.
377
None of the Powers, great or small, has been
able to resolve the world crisis. It drags on through the years, getting
aggravated with each year. This is because all the Powers try to resolve it
against the wrong background, using ideas and methods which may have formerly
been right but now are obsolete and inapplicable. This is the Nuclear Age. It
requires a totally new approach.
378
If God's in his heaven and all's well with the
world, are we in error to attempt reforms where they are obviously needed or to
right wrongs where they are heavily oppressive? No - this is no error, for the
attempt itself will then be induced by the divine presence.
379
Men who have lost the sense of life's spiritual
significance, and who do not even have any insistent questions about it, will
not respond to such events in the correct way.
380
Hitherto religion has provided the ordinary man
with the truth in a form he was capable of comprehending. But owing to the wider
spread and quickened evolution which he has undergone in recent centuries, he
has become capable of comprehending more deeply that which was formerly kept
apart from popular religion and reserved for mysticism, the next higher form.
Consequently it is no longer enough to limit him to merely religious dogmas and
practices; these must now be intermixed with mystical doctrines and practices
also. It is a fact that war and crisis have multiplied by many times the number
of mystical seekers. But the new group is still, relative to the total
population, extremely small, insignificant and uninfluential. Yet the benefits
of mysticism could be of untold help to countless others. The temporary
forgetfulness from current turmoils and personal burdens which mental quietism
offers its votaries should prove attractive to quite a number of persons in
these times. For the need of pe rsonal, firsthand experience of the soul is
greater today than ever before. Therefore the importance of this work is
unquestionable.
381
So many are discussing the new economic world
which they hope, expect, or demand to emerge during the postwar period, and so
few the new spiritual world without which it can only be a failure. The truth is
that both are needed, that one without the other will be an imperfect incomplete
thing.
382
Because we live in an era of flux, we need a
better-exercised intelligence and intuition to negotiate it aright.
383
The real war today is within the human mind. The
real choice is between allegiances being made there. As individuals give
themselves up to, or cleanse themselves from, the base emotions, they carry on
this inner war.
384
The interminable quarrels over ownership of
countries will always produce recurring wars. So long as Nature's proprietorship
is ignored and unacknowledged, so long will men and nations stake out their
selfish claims to perpetual possession.
385
It is an inexorable fact, which no politician
can controvert by other facts but only by windy oratory and glib promises, that
the causes of international tension friction and war will never be removed
except by removing the egotisms, the greeds, the wraths, and other negatives
from man's nature. Until then, we shall get rid of one old cause only to find a
new one springing up in its train.
386
Until they inwardly recognize and publicly
realize the overriding importance of thought and feeling in these matters, their
remedies will be illusory, their hopes denied, and their forebodings fulfilled
by the course of events.
387
Those who are led by religious enthusiasts to
expect a miraculous conversion of mankind to goodwill peace and wisdom
overnight, expect the impossible and are preparing themselves for bitter
disappointment. Human character grows gradually; it does not improve by magical
transformation. It is better to be realistic, to face the unpalatable truth,
than to surrender ourselves to wishful thinking and be deceived thereby. For
emotion and passion are still the real rulers of mankind, say what you will.
388
Human society has always had its problems and
even more so in our times. But the larger the number of problems the larger the
number of agencies seeking to solve them grows. Why do we have to solve every
problem with which the world is confronted? Why can't we leave them alone,
indifferent, and attend solely to our own problems? Why must we meddle in
affairs we ill understand? The answer is that we fail to see that the world is
itself the great problem for which there is no solution.
389
There can be no perfect solution to the world's
troubles because there can be no permanent one. All changes, all is transient.
390
There would be more peace in countries and
between nations, in families and between neighbours, if people stopped meddling
in other people's affairs or interfering in each other's lives or fanatically
forcing their doctrinaire ideas and beliefs where these are repugnant.
391
Most eloquent of all is Emerson: "Love is the
one remedy for all ills. We must be lovers and at once the impossible becomes
possible. Our history for these 1000 years has not been the history of kindness
but of selfishness. Love would put a new face on this weary old world, in which
we dwell as enemies too long. Love will accomplish that which force could never
achieve. Once or twice in history, kindness has been tried in illustrious
instances, with signal success."
392
Lao Tzu wrote this parting advice to the
civilization he forsook:
393
Censorious minds have doubtless much to pick on
which is wrong or rotten in our society, but until they have something better to
replace it with, some really worthwhile alternative, of what use is the
destruction and liquidation of that which has been built up?
394
The spiritual progress of man winds upward by
devious routes, by slow wanderings, and by periodic lapses. But its ultimate
character as progress remains assured. Slowly, out of all these wartime
reflections and peacetime crises, these dangers, agonies, and calamities, the
world is becoming aware that it must find for its day-to-day activities a strong
support, a better faith, and a truer ideology.
395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 When men misuse their liberty to commit crime, we withdraw it and put them in
prison. But legal punishment has two grave defects: it makes no provision for
moral re-education alongside of the physical punishment, and it makes no
difference between the repentant sinner and the nonrepentant one. The criminal
is simply a man who has misinterpreted life, failed in self-discipline, accepted
the suggestions of an evil environment, or been hurt by a hard social system. It
is not enough to enforce retribution. Society must help him straighten his
life-pattern, improve himself, and re-establish his ethical sense. Prisons
should be not merely penal institutions but also educative ones. Every prisoner
should be brought under some system of instruction that would elevate his
character - instead, as often happens, of debasing it still further.
It is far easier to degrade oneself than to uplift oneself. Every criminal
knows that. The process of manufacturing a criminal is simple and easy. He
commits his first crime and then, in order to save himself from its effects, he
has to commit a second one. Once again he has to save himself from the effects
of this one in turn and so commits a third crime. In the end he slides down a
long slippery slope and becomes a hardened criminal! Only forethought for others
or fear of the consequences for himself will save a man from taking the first
ominous step. It is because men have insufficient forethought or insufficient
knowledge of the consequences that they become criminals.
Or else, after the first punishment, instead of trying to understand the
lessons of their sufferings, they nurse under-surface resentments which later
explode and injure their whole life. It seems to offer an easier way out than
the sterner path of moral repentance and honest endeavour. But they fail to
foresee that it is no way out at all, that the selfish new crimes merely revive
and worsen the hateful old tribulations. With every wrong step they take, they
walk nearer and nearer to that calamity. What their befooled minds do not know
is that even if they pass from successful crime to successful crime,
nevertheless - under karmic and evolutionary law - they will later pass from
painful retribution to painful retribution.
All this can be as true of nations as of an individual. Instead of meditating
on the defeat that overtook them, they actually meditate on the victory that
they themselves nearly overtook. Even when punishment is catastrophic and
overwhelming, the very immensity of it creates a strong egoistic passion for
self-justification, leaving room for only few and faint signs of any real change
of heart. Such moral declension is as low and saddening as it is too often
repeated by history. Every criminal nation which is at all curable must be
brought to understand the moral degradation into which it fell when it blindly
followed a path of pillage or violence. They learn little, understand little,
and take to themselves few lessons from experience. They suffer, but their
suffering is misread and misinterpreted. Here, for those who still doubt the
truth of reincarnation, is one more argument in its favour. No single lifetime
is enough to provide the necessary range of varied experience and to bring human
de velopment to an optimum of moral perfection - not even twenty lifetimes would
be enough.
All aggressive persons and antisocial criminals reveal by their attitudes
that they are still children in the understanding of life. There are two schools
of thought as to their treatment. They have done wrong and must be punished.
They have done wrong but must be forgiven. To state the problem in either of
these drastic ways alone and let it go at that is dangerously to oversimplify
its complications and difficulties, nay, is indeed misleading. For both these
statements are true yet are so only in their own places. The first, presented by
the cynics, advocates rigorous punishment. The second, presented mostly by the
religious idealists, advocates a complete forgive-and-forget policy. The first
is sadistic, the second sentimental. Both are unwise. Philosophy avoids such
extremes and finds a sensible middle way between them. It says we must not push
the criminal farther down the road of wrong-doing by evoking his spirit of
revenge through unduly harsh treatment. Yet we must not let him walk dow n it of
his own accord by letting him believe that wrong-doing brings no retribution at
all.
A merely sentimental view of this problem will not really help us or them. A
thoroughly psychological view will not only save us from further depredations
but also save them from falling again into their own worst self. A misplaced
adherence to emotional upsurges will, however, prevent us from correctly
perceiving the true facts of this complex problem. It is the dictate of wisdom
that we shall not forget, but it is also the dictate of compassion that we shall
forgive. Little sectarian minds can only oppose these two as antitheses, whereas
large philosophic minds can hold them harmoniously together. There is some
confused thinking in the minds of pious people about the question of
forgiveness. Criminal aggressors - whether they be single individuals or whole
nations - need to be punished as much for their own moral benefit as for the
physical protection of society. If through sentimental emotion they are left
unpunished, then we render them a disservice. For they will fail to learn the
age-old lesson that crime does not pay. Not that they will really escape from
the inevitable come-back of karma, but when perpetration of crime is swiftly
followed by proportionate punishment, the moral lesson involved is brought home
to the wakeful consciousness much more effectively than when the same lesson is
brought home to the subconscious at a later period or in another birth. There
are times when a naughty child asks for and deserves spanking. Just as we do not
hate a child even when performing such punitive operation, we ought not to hate
the erring criminals who have put their energies into wrong channels even when
we are restraining or punishing them. It should be done in the spirit of
education, impersonally, calmly, without hatred, but with firm inflexible
determination to teach them the lesson of their own experiences - the truth that
barbarity does not pay.
There are brutes in human shape. That all the links between the baboon and
men have not been lost is plainly proved by the very existence of these
creatures. They will respond only to a language which they can understand:
disciplinary punishment, firm repression. Their twisted minds must be surgically
operated on, which means that they must be made to feel something of the pain
which they made others suffer. Therefore those who through false sentimentality
or wrong religion would here use kindness make a profound mistake.
But, object some religious and most mystical persons, ought we not to show
mercy? Ought we not to forgive a sinner? Yes, we ought to forgive because we
should comprehend that he sins through ignorance of life's unwritten laws. But
the scriptural injunction to forgive enemies is often misconstrued. We ought to
show mercy and forgive sinners but we should do the one at the right time and
the other to the right person. Otherwise, we merely misplace these virtues and
thus convert them into vices. It When we witness the return to life of a criminal's sleeping conscience, the
remorseful recognition of wrong-doing, and the honest admission of guilt, when
he expresses genuine sorrow over his crimes and shows forth sincere repentance,
it will be right and proper to treat him mercifully and forgivingly. In the
moment when he truly repents, to our joy and his profit, in that same moment we
must extend forgiveness and help him start a fresh and better life. But those
other individuals who do not do any of these things, who merely smart with
resentment and thirst for revenge, their treatment must be stern and punitive.
Unless and until they do repent thoroughly, wise justice has no option but to
treat them firmly. This treatment is helpful to their purification. A
sentimental neglect to administer this tart medicine will only morally harm them
in the end, let alone expose the world to a repetition of their crime.
The guilty must learn that everything has to be paid for. But the dearness or
cheapness of the price they must pay should depend partly upon the measure of
spontaneous repentance and amendment which they themselves bring forth. For
there is always the divine message which, if they will tardily heed and obey it,
can mitigate their unhappy lot. And that message says, "Repent, and be
redeemed!" But repentance must run deep, into open deeds and secret thoughts, if
it is to be karmically effective. Its reality must be proved by abundant
evidence. The criminals have to pay today for what they have done yesterday. But
if they have acknowledged their error, if they are genuinely remorseful,
repentant in heart and mind and deed, if they strive spontaneously to make what
amendment for the past it is still possible to make, then in that case new karma
will manifest itself side by side with the old and thus modify their miseries.
For although it is true that part of their future already exists even now, owing
to karmic causes which they themselves set going, it is equally true that until
the events of that future crystallize into the space-time world they are always
liable to be modified by any fresh karmic causes which are introduced into their
own domain.
How many can take this essential step of a moral about-turn? Can we awaken a
criminal in jail to a sense of his personal failure and moral shame? Because he
has suffered the humiliation of retribution, there is always the probability of
comprehending that there is a better way. And because he is a human being, there
is always the possibility of ethical recovery and moral improvement. Those who
believe that they can solve such a problem as criminality on a merely practical
basis alone are wrong. Experience will teach them that it is inseparable from a
moral one, too. For if the criminal really repents, then our duty is to forgive
him. A moral shift on his part should lead to a practical shift on ours.
We may forgive criminals and yet punish them for wrong-doing, if that be our
duty, or place them under such external limitations as will prevent their
further wrong-doing, if that also be our duty. The two are not contradictory. If
we keep our hearts unpolluted by hatred, we may keep our hands sternly and
firmly on the wrong-doer. This is included in what the Bhagavad Gita
means when it defines the higher yoga as being "the skilful performance of
action." The skilfulness here meant is obviously not the technical kind but
rather the mystical power to remain inwardly detached whilst doing worldly duty.
During the war, it became necessary for philosophic students to learn how to
fight a cruel aggressor in the right spirit; they had paradoxically to learn how
to deliver without anger or hate hard blows against him whilst feeling profound
pity for his moral darkness.
But philosophic students are few. It is useless to ask humanity in its
present state of evolution to behave on this high plane. A sage (and perhaps
those who try to follow him) would not find it difficult to extend his
compassionate goodwill to all criminals - indeed he would find it difficult not
to - but it would be too much to expect that everybody else is capable of
extending it.
430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 But with the advent of the atomic and hydrogen bombs the method of fighting
for any cause, even a righteous one, has become the greater of two evils where
formerly it was the lesser. Where self-defense may lead to certain and suicidal
self-destruction, we begin to pause, to consider, and to hesitate.
Any investigation of the destiny of nations from a philosophic point of view
shows that the appearance of an aggressive invader on a people's borders must
have some underlying karmic cause deeper than the obvious political or economic
one. Just as the appearance of a certain unpleasant event in an individual's
life is often due to corresponding faults or weaknesses in him which need to be
remedied, so the invader's appearance points to deficiencies or errors in the
invaded nation's inner life. They too need correction. There is no escape from
this inner duty, and so long as the weaknesses remain so long will troubles
appear or assaults threaten.
Until the nations achieve this moral development, they can hope only to
restrict the violence and area of war, not to eradicate it. Such a restriction
can be brought about by external means only by an international policing army,
just as society's crime is restricted by local police. This single army to
replace the many armies implies some kind of a world government. Yet national
feelings are everywhere still unwilling to sacrifice themselves to a
supernational government, and there is some ground for the refusal. There is no
other prospect of its arrival than through a third world war, whose aftermath
would unquestionably be the birth of a world government to control international
relations, leaving the separate peoples free to pursue their own policies in
regard to internal ones. This is the only alternative path to peace, terrible
though it be.
Meanwhile what is the duty of the spiritually awakened individual, as apart
from the unawakened nations? Has the time come for him to practise a new
approach? Does the old one of meeting violence with violence belong to the
animal world? Then what is the new one which belongs to the human world? Must he
cease to take life, withdraw from this course of endless slaughter, and seek
protection from the higher powers by offering up even the will to live itself if
needs be? The individual alone can test the truth and worth of this newer moral
concept. For support of it offers no early likelihood of attaining sufficient
strength as a political power. Philosophy can give no lead in the matter. The
decision is a personal one. Each must decide for himself.
483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503
Many leaders such as Churchill, and even the
Pope, have talked of a new world to be built. Their aims are excellent but it
will not suffice to change things externally alone; people must be educated
aright, which means they must be educated in truth. The time to sit in seclusion
or to enjoy one's inner peace all alone will then have gone. Service and Action
will be the keynote. The justification of the higher philosophy is what it can
do ultimately, not merely what it can think. It alone has a sane view
because it alone knows the need of a sound foundation in correct thinking plus
an active effort afterwards, erected on such a foundation. How hard this
ultimate teaching is as a way of life until one becomes habituated to it! For he
has to feel that all the world is but a dream, even horrid wars, and yet he will
have to know it as actual and act as though it were real. For ultimately it is
real. Just as all the events, people, and objects of a dream are after all
nothing but Mind, in es sence, because they are ideas and Mind is their reality,
so in this world we have to understand that that which is regarded as Mind,
unified, all around us
So much progress that men hope for from a
science-based, politically guided civilization turns out to be a chimera. There
is no good that science gave them without its costly price, no promise held out
by political shifts without its revelation of the evil in man. Real peace, true
progress, genuine prosperity can come only by a different road.
Those utopians who look for a quick abatement of
human selfishness - and a consequent quick abatement of all the ghastly evils,
sins, and crimes which come out of it - look in vain. But what cannot come
quickly on a mass scale can, and will, come from scattered individuals.
First the killing instinct will have to go, then
the fighting instinct will have to follow.
To eliminate the frictions in the world it would
be necessary to eliminate those between human beings.
Those who do not know that human evolution moves
through double rhythms of ascension and declension, talk cheerfully of an
increasing spiritual revival moving triumphantly to the complete change of our
species. But the fact is that what we see are vestiges of medieval faith rather
than a rising spirituality.
Even if the world crashed in a nightmare of
hate, evil, and ruin all around us, those who gave their allegiance to Goodness
and Wisdom were not wrong nor their efforts a total failure.
The nations can use nuclear energy to explode
bombs or they can use it to power engines: they must choose between these two
alternatives. If they try to evade the choice and to have both, they will end by
losing both in the annihilation of nuclear war.
An age which has found a surer and swifter way
to destroy the human species has done so because it gave so much enquiry, so
much thought, to the nature of the atom. Why cannot it give a fraction of that
enquiry and that thought to the nature of mind, when the consequences would be
so much more useful?
Is there, can there be, such a thing on earth as
a paradise without sin? The answer is that it does not now exist and that it can
exist in the future only if it is also a paradise without any people!
It was the Stoics who wrote that the wise man
will not waste his energy and years in futile political endeavours if he finds
his environment too corrupt.
One need not be a materialist to reach the
conclusion that perfect solutions of social, economic, or religious problems
simply do not exist; there are only palliatives, not panaceas.
The quietude on this planet grows less and less;
the noise and turmoil more and more. The need of this inner life becomes greater
but the possibility of realizing it becomes smaller. Yet the problem is not a
new one; only a recurring one. Two thousand five hundred years ago the gentle
old dreamer Lao Tzu wrote of it.
The course of nihilism, as travelled by the
intelligent classes of our time, ends either in bitter communistic materialism
or unprincipled anarchic amoralism or retrogressive Catholic or Hindu mysticism.
But do any of these neurasthenic terminals offer an adequate solution of the
modern man's problems, a comfortable home for the modern consciousness? Whoever
is fully alive to twentieth-century needs and trends, cannot say that they do.
What can we gain by moving back in time? The
crossroads at which we stand must be faced, not run away from. The attempt to
renounce our times and leave our century will be severely defeated by the grim
facts of these times, the harsh events of this century. There is no sanctuary in
medievalism.
Neither reason nor goodwill were able to force
Europe to adopt a wiser and purer form of religion, so utter impoverishment and
bloody war had to force her to think. Only an overwhelming realization that such
a change is supremely urgent, supremely essential, and supremely fundamental, if
civilized society is not to break down completely, will compel this
reconstruction. And the situation created by entry into the postwar period
provides this required but dearly bought realization. And what is true of
Europe, which suffered most during the war, will be true in a lesser degree of
other parts of the world.
A highly exaggerated mystically sponsored Golden
Age of the remote past is as supposititious as a materialistically sponsored one
of the near future is unrealizable.
It is a silly mistake which some mystically
minded enthusiasts fall into, that everybody is soon going to follow mysticism!
The only basis they have for this assertion would appear to be that they move
within a tiny circle where everybody is following mysticism and that they are
judging the larger world outside by what is happening inside the circle.
The pathway of greedy acquisition upon which
humanity now stands must be left for wise co-operation. The old motives will not
work today.
Destiny is at work and all the multitude of
prayers to God are not going to save humanity from what it creates for itself.
Nothing could have been more ironic than the bombs falling on Warsaw Cathedral
when more than a thousand worshippers were inside praying for God's protection
on Poland.
The war period has shown how uncertain are all
materialistic standards, how much they are at the mercy of military political
and economic shifts. It must therefore articulate in thoughtful minds a quest of
higher standards which shall transcend such uncertainties and shifts.
Because humanity must find the solution to their
troubles within themselves, all the so-called solutions offered from without
have proved disappointing. And because the attempt to find scapegoats in other
men, other political parties, other doctrines of belief, and other nations is
really an attempt to relieve themselves of this personal responsibility, they
have so far failed to find an end to their troubles.
Those inspirers of evil-doing and racial
animosity who fondly believe that they can protect themselves against the forces
of spiritual evolution which are stirring within the consciousness of mankind,
are dwelling in an atmosphere of futile make-believe.
To outgrow the instinctive cravings of the
primitive animal-man and to supplant them by the noble aspirations of the
well-advanced truly human being, is the only way to guarantee peace on
earth.
We shall have to renounce this fetish of
achieving absolute agreement and full unity among those who differ from each
other in fundamentals. Human nature and human mentality being in the present
unregenerate and diverse condition as they are, it is futile to pursue an
unrealizable ideal.
The attempts to prevent war and unify the
nations can meet with no success while we make no attempt to discipline the
violent impulses and greedy calculations which cause war. Only when human
evolution has gone farther, and the brute's instincts have been sufficiently
disciplined in us, shall we drop war. But the clash of egoisms will still
remain. Our frictions and battles will continue; their outer form will, however,
change for the better and be lifted to a plane more truly human and beyond the
merely animal.
If present-day world misery demonstrates
anything at all, it demonstrates the failure of the materialistic outlook, the
futility of expecting peace and prosperity from purely material sources, the
danger of ignoring the stubborn fact that personal character counts most in the
making of a people's happiness. The old way of sheer materialism has been tried
and found to end in a dangerous morass. The new way of a nobler life and deeper
faith does not look so tempting. Yet other way there is not except to sink in a
still deeper morass.
Communism could be defeated and Socialism
avoided if the appeal they make to the discontented could be eliminated. This in
turn requires the cause of discontentment be itself eliminated. That cause is
the too unequal distribution of (a) profits (b) income and (c) capital. The
remedy for (a) is to make labour an equal partner with capital in the sharing of
profits by a system of co-partnership. The remedy for (b) is to fix maximum and
minimum incomes. The remedy for (c) is inheritance reform.
Whatever benefit has come from politics
physically has had to be paid for spiritually, for it has poisoned human
relationships.
In the end society is only a society of separate
persons; in the end we come back to the individual human problem.
There is much demand today for various rights in
their totality. Can the right to freedom be fully given to maniacs and
murderers? Can the right to free expression in speech and writing be given at
those who spread hatred or immorality? Can the right to education be given at a
level beyond the capacities of those who make it? If life is to be orderly, if
crime is to be contained, then there must be limits as well as rights.
There is no other way left for us today than the
way of looking right through the facts of the contemporary situation, to their
underlying significance, their foundational cause, if we are to understand it
aright. We must have the courage to acknowledge them for what they are. We must
have the strength to be pessimistic if pessimism is required by truth. We must
have the humility to confess our errors.
When we understand the forces which work behind
the curtain of history, we stop groping.
Crime and punishment
The punishment of crime should be of such a
nature as to be materially useful to society and morally useful to the criminal.
Crime and Punishment (Essay)
An alternative to physical punishment, such as
flogging, for brutal crimes of violence would be to put the criminal upon a
semi-starvation diet. His bodily weakness would then affect his mental
aggressiveness, would reduce and counter it.
If capital punishment is the law, at least
change the method to withholding of food until death by starvation.
Pacifism: general, non-nuclear ethic
A prominent American pacifist stated that
"someone somewhere must make a start to end war." This is true and laudable and
certainly a needed reminder to mankind of its higher goal, but the problem
involved in the current world crisis is not solved as simply as that. Just as in
philosophic practice the ultimate view has to be coupled with the immediate one,
so here with human nature in its present stage of evolvement, the recognition of
the basic difference between a just and an unjust war must be given.
A philosopher is a pacifist in the sense that he
does not practise violence against other living creatures. But he is not an
uncompromising pacifist. He does not consider the use of arms wrong in all
circumstances. A situation can be imagined where it would be wiser and, in the
end, kinder to use force deliberately. Yet the general fact remains that the
history of warfare is a history of the manifestation of man's lower nature, his
bestial nature, and his evil nature. As he grows spiritually he will organize
more and more for peace, less and less for war.
He allows other creatures the right to live,
even to the point of eating no meat, but if they encroach on his own right, and
endanger his own survival, then he will defend himself as resolutely as other
men. Nor is the situation changed if these creatures are not animal but human.
Pacifism is useful as a protest against human proneness to resort to violence,
so he sympathizes with it in specific cases. But its usefulness ends when
unscrupulous aggression seeks to triumph and needs the education of defeat.
The pacifist movements naturally attract
intellectuals and artists, ministers of religion and humanitarians. But they
also attract the sinister and subversive elements who try to direct, guide, or
secretly control them, to make them serve their own antisocial destructive
purposes. The presence and prominence of genuine idealists along with these
pretended ones create confusion in the public mind. How can a movement be bad
which is supported by such good men? That they are being used as a cover for the
activities of bad men who spread falsehood and preach hatred is not so easily
seen.
The classic objection which was so often thrown
at Gandhi, is still a sound one. "Would you stand by, in your adherence to the
ethic of nonviolence, and allow your wife, mother, or sister to be raped without
lifting an arm to protect her?" The man who pushes the nonviolent attitude so
far that he will not even help save the victim of such an attack, is a
doctrinaire, the victim of his own misapplied fanaticism. Nature (God) can be
very violent at times: it is not always peaceful.
On the mystical level, all war is evil and all
pacifism is good. On the philosophical level, the universality of this rule
vanishes. We there rise from a judgement based on pure feeling to a judgement
based on its integration by intuition with pure reason, the result of which is
intelligence.
If pacifism is to mean the acceptance of evil
then it cannot be enough.
Gandhi's advice to the young man that he should
still practise absolute non-violence if someone attacked his sister, is not
perfect. He would better have advised the use of force unless the young man were
so developed that he could successfully defend her without it and unless the
assailant were so sensitive that non-violence would bring out a response in him.
In other words, the pacifist principle should certainly be applied in every case
where it is likely to be effective but refrained from where it is likely to
fail. It is not a principle of universal applicability.
Men whose temperament is naturally given to
violence in speech or deed, or those who always stir up agitation, extremism,
irreconciliation, and intransigence, must be firmly and unflinchingly ruled.
Weakness would be folly.
The whole history of Europe during the past
fifty years could have been changed had pacifism not been misapplied. After
Lenin seized power in Russia the leader of the Socialist Revolutionary Party,
which not only had a majority in the Constituent Assembly but controlled more
regiments than the Bolsheviks, refused to put up any resistance. He said,
"Russian blood must not be shed." If strong action had been taken then Lenin
could have been thrown out and the loss of freedom in so many countries - half
the world - prevented from happening.
It may be asked why the counsel to practise
nonviolence was ever given at all by saints and prophets. Obviously it is
ethically the highest instance of forgiveness and the most effective way of
transcending the ego practically.
The proper course is to try kindly reasonable
and nonviolent methods of resisting aggression. If they fail then forceful ones
become the only alternative. But they should not blur the goodwill which must be
felt towards all men, including enemies.
The mistake made is to be solely dependent on
violent methods, when gentler ones would achieve the same end without letting in
the poison of hate and without creating so much new misery.
That country is truly civilized where the
killing instinct is held in abeyance and regarded with abhorrence.
Pacifism in light of nuclear threat
With the world as it is and in mankind's present
evolutionary condition, it would be imprudent to reject violence at all times
and during all events. But to reject the violence of nuclear weapons would be
the highest prudence.
In earlier eras the duty of armed resistance to
armed aggression was both a practical and moral one. In the present era changed
conditions require a revision of this duty.
The evil passions of men produce wars which, in
this nuclear age, can end only in destroying both sides alike. Therefore for
rulers even to talk of the possibility of taking part in such war today is sheer
madness.
The threat of nuclear bombing has created a
situation so entirely new that the old ideas about defense have to be scrapped.
Formerly it was logical and morally right to meet violence with violence, but
now it is suicidal and morally wrong to do so.
In the past, international aggression
accompanied by force had to be met by national defense accompanied by force. The
resultant war was, unhappily, inescapable. It was bad, but it was better than
surrendering to evil. In the present, this is no longer true. The use of nuclear
forces in war is a completely immoral act. It is so not only because the scale
on which it annihilates men, women, and children alike is unheard of, but also
because the aftermath which succeeds it will be so savage as to be worse than
the communism or capitalism such a war sets out to destroy. The means used being
wrong, the end result will be equally wrong, besides being unwanted and perhaps
unexpected.
What the Bomb has done is to show up war for the
evil thing that it is. Are its warnings to pass unheeded simply because we do
not wish to be troubled by such sombre morbid thoughts?
The greatest value of the atomic bomb, after its
compulsory prevention of war, is its compulsory abolition of frontiers. It
renders them meaningless. It makes a world authority inevitable. It renders a
merely international league insufficient. Only a world federation and world
authority will suffice to meet it. With this change in media, all military
manuals became obsolete overnight. What gunpowder did to the bow and arrow,
atomic bombs have done to gunpowder. The political struggle to secure strategic
frontiers has now lost all meaning. For there are none.
We are told that adequate means of defense must
be maintained, else the evil powers arraigned against us will overwhelm the
liberties, the justice, the religion, the decencies we hold dear. We are told
further that the policy of unilateral nuclear renunciation is a policy of
surrender to those powers. The answer is that those who support the traditional
way of defending those liberties - the military way - are today the real
enemies, since the traditional way will lead inescapably to war, which in turn
will lead to their total destruction, and our partial destruction. Those who
claim that the next war will not necessarily be a nuclear one, talk like fools.
When such power is within the reach of men, they will act like human beings,
with all the weakness of human beings to resist great temptation, to grasp it.
If it is not rejected now, in the calmer atmosphere of peace, it will certainly
not be rejected later in the tenser atmosphere of war. If the unilateral policy
is not accepted now, the penalty will inevitably follow.
War is no longer the same. The revolution which
has taken place in it is so absolute that it has not merely destroyed an old
form of war, but war itself. That which will take its place is the murder of
half of mankind and the suicide of the murderers.
The weapons of physical warfare are also the
symbols of man's hates or greeds, suspicions or fears. So far as the first of
these negative emotions is concerned, Buddha neatly put the point: "Hatred
ceaseth not by hatred; it ceaseth only by love." This lesson of two world wars
must be extracted, and extracted quickly, if a third world war is to be avoided.
And in the face of atomic extinction, the practice of nonviolent pacifism, which
is the outer expression of love, is not mere sentimentality but the highest
rationality and practicality.
The nonviolent way to bring peace to the world
is today the only way even though in the pre-atomic age it may not have been.
For under this menace of nuclear weapons war cannot be prevented, nor peace
attained and maintained, by the traditional arms race.
Is it practical and realistic to turn this earth
into a gigantic incinerator? Yet that is just what those leaders who insist on
making and piling up atom bombs are doing. Nothing could be more practical than
throwing all those satanic bombs away - if in the meaning of practicality we are
to include actions which promote our survival.
The practice of nonviolent pacifism at this
juncture of history where the menace of atomic warfare is so unprecedented, is
not mere surrender. It is a new way of fighting which uses spiritual weapons
instead of physical ones. But whereas atomic warfare would destroy both
antagonists and bring barbarism, this new way will save both. It will save their
lives and their civilizations. More, it will give a tremendous spiritual boost
to the side which tries it first and ultimately give some uplift to the other
side too.
In renouncing war for such reasons we do not
necessarily renounce evil for good. We simply choose between evils and abandon
what has now become the greater evil for a lesser.
So long as this enormous distrust of each other
remains, so long will the desire for disarmament on both sides fail of
realization. There is no likelihood that it will not continue to remain.
Therefore if this failure is ever to be brought to an end, what cannot be
reached by both sides agreeing together must be reached by one side acting
alone. That is, the goal of full disarmament can only be reached by stages, and
this is the first stage. It has some unsatisfactory and disconcerting features,
it raises new doubts and fears, but all that is outweighed by the enormous gain
of preventing a nuclear war.
We are confronted by the power of evil in
formidable array and menacing guise. We cannot ignore it for it forces itself
aggressively into our lives. We may not, without being untrue to our ideals,
respond to its crude and cruel emotional and intellectual attacks with the same
weapons, with hatred, greed, contention, with the rejection of God, morality,
and truth. This we admit. But to its threats of physical attack we consider
ourselves entitled to use the same physical weapons. We refuse to let ourselves
be dragged down to evil's own low plane inwardly but we are willing to let
ourselves be dragged down outwardly. Why this difference? If the one is wrong,
the other is also wrong. A sharp logic requires us to hold firm heroically in
nonviolence, and not to copy the ways and weapons of our antagonists.
If the course suggested here offers great risks,
as it does, it is justified by the incontestable fact that to hold inflexibly to
the old one offers immeasurably greater risks of spilling death upon us all. The
pattern of fighting in war has been followed since history began. It is a
familiar one and was safe enough to follow in the past, for both antagonists
survived. But now in this nuclear age, it has lost its safety, for both know
that they are unlikely to survive a nuclear war. A new and unfamiliar pattern is
needed and must be created, and that quickly. Time is running out.
The alternative choices are both evil, but not
equally evil. Either we disarm and seek peace on the best obtainable terms - no
matter how crushing they may be - or we continue the nuclear armaments race
until it eventually and inevitably ends in nuclear war. Under the first choice
we may find ourselves - if the worst happens - in a situation hardly short of
virtual surrender. Its consequences may include atheistic education for the
young and the disappearance of all that is fine in our civilization. But it
would continue to survive and after some time reciprocal influences would begin
to appear. Under the second choice, in fighting to defend our way of life by
atomic weapons, we would be using an evil means to attain a good end.
There will be risks either way, so why not take
the risk of peace rather than of war?
History will continue to repeat itself so long
as men believe that force and violence are the only ways of achieving security,
so long as no nation has the moral courage to apply spiritual truth.
In one sense our time is a challenge to change
old ways of thinking about war. It is a time to draw on spiritual resources
until we see it in a new light, a spiritual light, which should induce us to
banish it once and for all. It is a chance to avert calamity and create
opportunity. There is no escape. If we do not rise to the new requirement, much
of our civilization will be eclipsed and most of us will vanish from the scene.
Since war can no longer serve as a useful
instrument of either attack or defense, it should be dropped from all thinking
and planning for the future, regardless of what other nations do.
Is mankind to be condemned forever to murder on
a national scale, is war to become an eternal state of affairs? Or will some
nation be heroic enough, wise enough, to break the vicious circle?
The saying, "War is not so burdensome as
slavery," was correct but only pertinent to all eras prior to the present one.
The first nation which will dare to apply this
truth to its own affairs and relationships will draw a dividing line through the
world's history. It may have to suffer although not in the same way, nor to the
same extreme extent, as did Telemachus, who was stoned to death in Rome's Arena
but accomplished his mission of putting an end forever to combats between man
and beast. But this nation will prove that the vicious circle of war unending
can be broken, that bloody combat of people against people can end.
If pacific and nonviolent methods will fail to
produce, in most circumstances, any immediate successful result, they cannot
fail in the long run, if patiently practised, to impress the adversary by their
example - hitherto unknown to and unconceived by him.
Nuclear war is immoral. This alone is sufficient
for one side to refuse to engage in it, whether or not the other side takes
advantage of such refusal.
In the absence of an impartial and effectual
world-authority, the only alternative to war as a means of settling disputes is
renunciation of the right to kill.
Man has been forced against a wall built from
the results of his own actions, that is, karma, and made to face two
alternatives: either he goes on preparing defensively or aggressively for war or
starts the new course of preparing for peace.
The remedy is simple to formulate, although
political and military leaders who find it unpalatable will assert that its
result would be worse than war. It is this: cease manufacturing both atomic
bombs and other atomic weapons; cease using the atom for military purposes in
any way. This may seem startlingly unrealistic but it is the only way to escape
an otherwise inevitable fate, too terrible to describe even in outline.
What Napoleon, Tamerlane, Genghis Khan, the
Caesars, and all the aggressive warrior-rulers known to history combined could
not kill during their entire lifetimes, can be killed in less than a minute by
the weapons of twentieth-century man.
The only way to put an end to any possibility of
atomic conflict is to put an end to atomic weapons. It is as simple as that.
The way of disarmament may fail to be accepted
but it is the only way open to us that could avert war, within the very limited
time available.
What is the opposing quality to the violence of
today? Not merely nonviolence - a negative one - but gentleness - a positive
one.(P)
Is the true patriot only the man who puts his
faith in brute force, harsh violence, and tragic destruction? Is there no love
of country in gentler ways? I venture the claim that the man who keeps himself
above war passions, who seeks and finds the Overself's inner peace and then
distributes it in his country's mental atmosphere, is worth more to the State
than the man who places his reliance on murderous weapons.
What Gandhi did for India we need someone to do
for the whole world. The freedom from colonial status which he achieved by
nonviolent means is a small thing compared with the freedom from the menace of
atomic warfare which must be achieved if civilization is to continue.
The problem of our proper reaction to war is a
difficult one. The duty of defending ourselves against, or rescuing the victims
of, a murderous assault seems to be a moral one and just as applicable to an
international scale as to an individual one. It seems right and reasonable to
believe that open aggression should be resisted and even, to a certain extent,
punished.
Constructive alternatives: individual
There are positive and negative forces in the
world and therefore in human beings. If a person cannot eliminate his negative
qualities (and most people find it almost impossible), he can, however, bring
them into a neutral point and thus establish a state of equilibrium or balance.
Living in a society where there is so much folly
and ignorance, evil and unbalance, he must protect himself mentally,
emotionally, physically, and even psychically.
In a world seething with negative thoughts,
murky in several areas with suspicion and even hatred, inflamed with violent
feelings, he who knows the truth must hold all the more to inner and outer calm,
to goodwill and faith in the Overself's presence.
Evil is strong in the world and sometimes people
who aspire to the good become discouraged and depressed. It is at such moments
that they need to recall whatever glimpses of the Real they have had and to
remember that all things pass away, including the evil.
We live in apocalyptic times, as history is
already revealing. The call today is a penitential one, a solemn recall from
earthliness to holiness, from frivolousness, grossness, and madness to
remembrance of life's higher purpose. Those who feel in their own hearts some
sort of a response, however feeble, should cling to this precious intuition and
let it guide them until they are saved.
The failure to persuade either the masses or
their leaders to change their way of life and thought is not a reason for
abandoning either the inner or outer work as useless. Even though any marked and
visible result may not now appear, it may yet do so at a later date. We must
have a moral concern which instigates acts aiming at conversion or makes
proposals even if they will obviously fail.
Questions about man's future and civilization's
prospects trouble us. More pessimistic answers are gloomily given than
optimistic ones. It is not easy to do otherwise, when the facts are so
tragically plain and when they lie so plentifully all around us. Philosophy
least of all can afford wishful thinking. It too sees the night falling but
whilst counselling stoic resignation it does not discourage constructive
resistance. And it reminds the individual that society's catastrophes should
urge him all the more to seek and find the one necessary refuge - his own
sacredness.
If anyone wants to see a better world he must
make his contribution toward it. And this demands inexorably that he begin with
himself and make his character and conduct better.
The prudent man learns by observation or by
experience, or more often by both, that there is spiritual ignorance in the
world and in man: he must often conceal the greater portion of his wisdom and
his power. This is necessary for his own protection and security. It was a
similar caution and desire for personal safety which induced the writers of
ancient Hindu texts and medieval Italian ones to advise those who lived under a
brutal tyranny to emigrate. This did not mean going to a new country but to a
new district.
There is not much that an individual can do in
time of great general catastrophe, such as the mass horror of war. But even
then, the hope and faith of an existence higher than the present one is not
without its value. At such times one must lean back, draw a deep breath, and
remark as Abraham Lincoln did during the blackest hours of the U.S. Civil War:
"This too will pass."
The coming of war brings its own anxieties. This
is when he has to draw upon his spiritual knowledge to get the strength and
courage to endure bravely special trials and tribulations. It is only at such
times of crisis that all higher interests get the chance to prove their solid
worth, for without their inner support and some kind of understanding of what it
all means, life becomes most inhumanly alarming. He may have found glimpses of
inner peace from time to time and now he has to insert these into his external
life and try to stretch them out through constant remembrance of the Real. Such
frequent communion and intelligent remembrance can give him the strength to go
on, the peace to put up with frustrations, doubts, and fears, and faith in what
is still beyond his conscious knowledge, the satisfaction that the years are not
being wasted. All other duties become better fulfilled when he fulfils this
supreme duty of realizing the ever-present reality within the heart. Indeed they
cannot be s eparated from it for through them Reality can express itself.
It is not palatable to hold the thought that
humanity is so bad, or else its rulers so misguided, that little or nothing can
be done to save it. Yet if it happens to be a true thought, we ought to be
strong enough to accept it and acknowledge that there are times when such a
defeatist outlook is justified and necessary.
It does not usually pay to be pessimistic but
that need not prevent our facing unpalatable facts.
The evil he has no opportunity to fight in the
larger world outside, he has every opportunity to fight in the smaller world
inside his own person.
With destruction awaiting modern civilization,
it is useless to look for a safer refuge than in finding the peace and strength
of the Overself. For if we do that, we shall also be led by it to do what may be
physically needful too.
If greater knowledge brings greater power, it
also brings greater responsibility. The more he receives from the Overself's
grace, the more should he give to humanity's need.
With so many people in the world today whose
outlook is negative, whose emotions are twisted and thinking is warped, it is
more needful to stand firm in one's own spot of positive thinking than ever.
Whoever doubts the truth of this message,
thereby deprives himself of its benefits. But this is equally true of the
believer who fears its truth. If the future holds distress and suffering, blows
and disasters, it is to be met with courage sought and asked from the higher
self. According to our faith, it will be given us.
It is not a question of what we like or prefer
or believe. It is a question of accepting quietly, or else defying vainly, the
course of events and the trend of destiny.
If catastrophe and obliteration threaten
humanity and if the individual is hopeless when confronted by them, it is
logical to conclude that although humanity might not be able to save itself, the
individual can save himself from these disasters if he believes that inner
salvation is at least a possibility where outer salvation is not. Yes, you and I
can save ourselves from within even when we cannot save ourselves from without.
That at least is a better lot than the one of the man who can save himself
neither from within nor from without and puts his faith in political action
alone. For politics is merely a system of human bargaining actuated by
self-seeking. It can invoke the aid of no higher power because it does not rise
higher than this self-seeking interest itself. But the individual is free to
lift himself above this sordid plane and therefore he is in a position to invite
the attention and aid of higher powers.
He who consciously inhabits reality will live
independent of the mutations of fate, the catastrophes of history, and the
crises of an epoch in dissolution. Even in crisis of war, where danger or even
death is lurking, philosophy reveals its immense practicability. For the
philosopher can meet them with the utter calmness, effective capacity, and
resolute heroism with which his studies, reflections, disciplines, and ideals
have formed his character. Amid the surging tides of postwar chaos he sets the
example and shows the value of philosophic discipline and the power of
philosophic principles by standing firm as a rock. Just as he kept cool in the
very midst of global conflagration, so he now keeps clear-sighted amid the gloom
of its dusty aftermath. In the very midst of world confusion, he becomes a
little oasis of strength and peace, wisdom and certitude, calm and holiness. If
he has to live in a chaotic disordered environment, the sad heritage of war, he
still lives his own constructive orde red pattern of existence. The very example
of such a man keeping steady and balanced thus silently helps some others who
are bewildered or aimless.