Old Versus
New Immigration
OLD IMMIGRATION:
1830 to 1860:
Mostly Irish and German
Irish: no self rule and potato famine
Germans: liberals and intellectuals after
revolution of 1848
1860 to 1890:
still mainly Northern Europeans (England,
Germany, Scandinavia)
many came to settle the frontier near
growing railroads
Many Americans welcomed
these immigrants as an asset to America as they were:
workers for factories, mines, railroads
farmers for the west
consumers for agricultural and industrial
products
men with special abilities and talents
additional manpower for military
easily assimilated in American society
Early opposition to
immigration:
The “Know Nothings” were an anti-
immigration group
they believed that:
immigrants took American jobs
they did NOT assimilate into society
they were Catholic (which they didn’t
approve of)
NEW IMMIGRATION 1890 to
1914:
came in much larger numbers than earlier
immigrants
mostly southern and eastern Europeans:
Italy, Greece, Austria-Hungary,
Russia, Poland
Settled mainly in cities near factories NOT
frontier
had more difficulty assimilating as they
were different from Americans
Italians and Greeks fled poverty
Austrians and Russians fled heavy
taxation and military service
Jews fled persecution
Reasons to Oppose the New
Immigrants:
with the frontier closed, there was no land
for them
new immigrants competed for jobs that
should belong to Americans
they were harder to “Americanize” and
had little education
they created ghettos and felt no need to
learn American ways
they were “inferior” to Old Immigrants
(theory of Nordic Sumpremacy)
In defense of the New
Immigrants:
they DID assimilate as well as the older
groups
Irish and Germans had retained old ways
and were not educated
farmers and Irish also contributed to
overcrowding in cities
they provided more workers for
expanding American industry
increased the market for American goods
Nordic Supremacy was proved false by
science