Postwar reconstruction and social upheavals, 1945-58
During World War II, liberal and moderate Iraqi elements began to play an active political role. The entry of the United States and the Soviet Union into the war and their declarations in favour of democratic freedoms greatly enhanced the position of the Iraqi democratic elements. The people endured shortages and regulations restricting personal liberty and the freedom of the press, trusting that the end of the war would bring the promised better way of life. The government, however, paid no attention to the new spirit, and the wartime regulations and restrictions continued after the war. The regent called a meeting of the country's leaders in 1945 and made a speech in which he attributed public disaffection to the absence of a truly parliamentary system. He called for the formation of political parties and promised full freedom for their activities and the launching of social and economic reforms.
The immediate reactions to the regent's speech were favourable, but, when political parties were formed in 1946 and certain regulations abolished, the older politicians and vested interests resisted. The new government formed in January 1946 was overthrown within a few months of its inception. General Nuri then became prime minister and tried to enlist the cooperation of political parties, but the general elections held under his government's supervision were no different from previous controlled elections. The parties boycotted the elections. General Nuri resigned in March 1947, and Salih Jabr formed a new government.
Jabr, the first Shi'ite politician to become a prime minister, included in his Cabinet a number of young men, but he himself was unacceptable to some liberal and nationalist elements who had been roughly handled when he was wartime minister of interior. Jabr tried to help the Arabs in Palestine in order to improve his image in nationalist circles, but he mishandled opposition leaders. Most damaging was his attempt to replace the Anglo-Iraqi treaty of 1930 without consulting with Iraqi leaders. When his attention was called to the need for consultation, he called in only older politicians and excluded the younger leaders.
Jabr entered into negotiations with Britain with the intention of enhancing his own position. When he found that Britain wanted to retain control of its air bases in Iraq, he insisted that Britain accept the principle of Iraqi control of the bases; Iraq would allow Britain to use them in the event of war. He threatened to resign if Britain refused his proposals.
It was with this understanding that Jabr proceeded to London early in 1948 to negotiate a new treaty. He and Ernest Bevin, the British foreign secretary, quickly came to an agreement and signed a 20-year treaty at Portsmouth on Jan. 15, 1948. It provided for a new alliance between Iraq and Britain on the basis of equality and complete independence and stated that :-
"each of the high contracting parties undertake not to adopt in foreign countries an attitude which is inconsistent with the alliance or which might create difficulties for the other party."
An improvement of the 1930 treaty, this treaty sought an alliance on the basis of mutual interests. The two air bases, which were often the subject of criticism, were returned to Iraq. British forces were to be evacuated, and Iraq would be supplied with arms and military training. The annex to the treaty stressed the importance of the air bases as "an essential element in the defense of Iraq." Britain's use of the bases in the event of war, or threat of war, would be dependent on Iraq's invitation. The treaty also provided for the establishment of a joint defense board for common defense and consultation. Both parties agreed to grant each other necessary facilities for defense purposes.
Despite these advances, the treaty was repudiated immediately in a popular uprising. Street demonstrations had occurred before the treaty was signed, in defense of Arab rights in Palestine, but, when the news of the signing of the new treaty was broadcast in London, rioting and demonstrations in Baghdad followed. The regent called a meeting at the royal household on January 21 that was attended by both older and younger leaders. After deliberations, they decided to repudiate the treaty. Jabr returned to Baghdad to defend his position but to no avail. Rioting and demonstrations increased, and Jabr was forced to resign.
The new treaty was not the root cause of the uprising. It was the culmination of a struggle between the young, liberal leaders who wanted to participate in political activities and the older leaders who insisted on excluding them. This conflict continued after the treaty was rejected. The older politicians returned to power under General Nuri's leadership.
In 1952 another popular uprising, stirred by opposition leaders and carried out by students and extremists, occurred. The police were unable to control the mob, and the regent called on the army to maintain public order. The chief of the general staff governed the country under martial law for more than two months. Civilian rule was restored at the beginning of 1953, but there was no sign that the country's older leaders were prepared to share authority with their opponents.
Meanwhile, King Faysal II, who had come of age, began to exercise his formal powers, and the period of regency came to an end. It was hoped that the regent would withdraw from active politics and allow the political forces of the country to create a new order. The former regent, who became the crown prince, continued to control political events from behind the scenes. The struggle for power among the leaders continued with increasing intensity until the downfall of the monarchy in 1958.
Despite political instability, Iraq achieved material progress during the 1950s, thanks to a new oil agreement that increased royalties and the establishment of the Development Board. The oil agreement between the Iraqi government and the Iraq Petroleum Company (IPC), originally signed in 1925, had yielded relatively modest royalties, owing to certain technical limitations, such as the need for pipelines, and to war conditions. It was not until 1952 that construction of pipelines to Banias was completed.
Some points of dispute between the Iraqi government and the IPC were not entirely resolved. The nationalization of the oil industry in Iran and the announcement of the 1950 agreement between Saudi Arabia and ARAMCO (Arabian American Oil Company), on a half-and-half basis of payment, induced the Iraqi government and the IPC to negotiate a new agreement on the division of profits. Some opposition leaders demanded the nationalization of the oil industry, but the Iraqi government and the IPC, forestalling any serious move for nationalization, agreed to negotiate on the basis of the fifty-fifty formula, to the mutual advantage of Iraq and the company. The new agreement was signed in 1952, allowing Iraq to take part of its share of the profits in kind and to receive an increasing amount of royalties specifically agreed upon between the two parties. It was stated that Iraq would receive no less than £330 million in 1953 and 1954 and no less than £350 million in 1955 and subsequent years.
In 1950 the government created an independent Development Board, an agency immune from political pressures and responsible directly to the prime minister. The board had six executive members, three of whom had to be experts in some branch of the development program. The prime minister, as chairman, and the minister of finance were ex-officio members. An amendment to the law increased membership by two and provided for a minister of development responsible directly to the head of the Cabinet. These members were appointed by the Cabinet, had equal voting rights, and were not permitted to hold any other official position. Two foreign members held positions as experts, and the Iraqi members were selected on merit and past experience. The board was composed of a council and ministry. Its staff was divided into technical sections and the ministry into a number of departments. The technical sections were for irrigation, flood control, water storage, drainage, transportation, and industrial and agricultural development. The board was financed from 70 percent of oil royalties and from loans and revenues from the board's own projects. The estimated expenditure of the first six-year program (1951-56) was £3155 million, and in 1950 the World Bank provided a loan of $12.8 million for the Wadi Ath-Tharthar flood-control project.
The Tharthar project, completed in 1956, connected the Tigris River at Samarra' (some 60 miles north of Baghdad) with the Wadi Ath-Tharthar Depression. A barrage was constructed on the Euphrates at Ramadi, making it possible to divert water into Lake Habbaniyah. Other flood-control plans, such as that at Bekme (completed after the revolution of 1958), were laid down. Extensive work on bridges and public buildings, including schools, hospitals, a new Parliament building, and a royal house, was started.
This work, especially the work on dams and irrigation projects, was a long-term investment, and many short-term projects of more direct benefit to the population were neglected. Opposition leaders attacked the Development Board for the stress on long-term projects that they claimed benefited only the vested interests--landowners and tribal chiefs. Despite criticism, the board maintained an independent status rarely enjoyed by any other government department. Nevertheless, the public remained unaware of the far-reaching effects of the projects undertaken, while the opposition attacked the board for squandering funds on contracts given to wealthy landlords and influential politicians.
Back to the History Page