Wonder Weapons
The Pentagon's quest for nonlethal arms is amazing. But is it smart?
BY DOUGLAS PASTERNAK
Tucked away in the corner of a drab industrial park in
For hundreds of years, sci-fi writers have imagined weapons that might use
energy waves or pulses to knock out, knock down, or otherwise disable
enemies--without necessarily killing them. And for a good 40 years the
Weapons already exist that use lasers, which can temporarily or permanently
blind enemy soldiers. So-called acoustic or sonic weapons, like the ones in the
aforementioned lab, can vibrate the insides of humans to stun them, nauseate
them, or even "liquefy their bowels and reduce them to quivering diarrheic
messes," according to a Pentagon briefing. Prototypes of such weapons were
recently considered for tryout when
While this and similar weapons may seem far-fetched, scientists say they are natural successors to projects already underway--beams that disable the electronic systems of aircraft, computers, or missiles, for instance. "Once you are into these antimateriel weapons, it is a short jump to antipersonnel weapons," says Louis Slesin, editor of the trade journal Microwave News. That's because the human body is essentially an electrochemical system, and devices that disrupt the electrical impulses of the nervous system can affect behavior and body functions. But these programs--particularly those involving antipersonnel research--are so well guarded that details are scarce. "People [in the military] go silent on this issue," says Slesin, "more than any other issue. People just do not want to talk about this."
Projects underway. To learn what the Pentagon has been doing, U.S. News talked to more than 70 experts and scoured biomedical and engineering journals, contracts, budgets, and research proposals. The effort to develop exotic weapons is surprising in its range. Scores of projects are underway, most with funding of several hundred thousand dollars each. One Air Force lab plans to spend more than $100 million by 2003 to research the "bioeffects" of such weaponry.
The benefits of bloodless battles for soldiers and law enforcement are obvious. But the search for new weapons--cloaked as they are in secrecy--faces hurdles. One is the acute skepticism of many conventional-weapons experts. "It is interesting technology but it won't end bloodshed and wars," says Harvey Sapolsky, director of the Security Studies Program at MIT. Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: "I have yet to see one of these ray gun things that actually works." And if they do work, other problems arise: Some so-called nonlethal weapons could end up killing rather than just disabling victims if used at the wrong range. Others may easily be thwarted by shielding.
Sterner warnings come from ethicists. Years ago the world drafted conventions and treaties to attempt to set rules for the use of bullets and bombs in war. But no treaties govern the use of unconventional weapons. And no one knows what will happen to people exposed to them over the long term.
Moreover, medical researchers worry that their work on such things as the use of electromagnetic waves to stimulate hearing in the deaf or to halt seizures in epileptics might be used to develop weaponry. In fact, the military routinely has approached the National Institutes of Health for research information. "DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] has come to us every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the central nervous system remotely," Dr. F. Terry Hambrecht, head of the Neural Prosthesis Program at NIH, told U.S. News. "But nothing has ever come of it," he said. "That is too science fiction and far-fetched." Still, the Pentagon plans to conduct human testing with lasers and acoustics in the future, says Charles Swett, an assistant for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. Swett insists that the testing will be constrained and highly ethical. It may not be far off. The U.S. Air Force expects to have microwave weapons by the year 2015 and other nonlethal weaponry sooner. "When that does happen," warns Steven Metz, professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Army War College, "I think there will be a public uproar. We need an open debate on them now."
Laser ethics
What happened with
On
Despite such arguments, the International Red Cross and Human Rights Watch
have since led a fight against antipersonnel lasers. In the fall of 1995, the
Acoustic pain
The next debate may well focus on acoustic or sonic weapons. Benign sonic effects are certainly familiar, ranging from the sonic boom from an airplane to the ultrasound instrument that "sees" a baby in the uterus. The military is looking for something less benign--an acoustic weapon with frequencies tunable all the way up to lethal. Indeed, Huntington Beach-based Scientific Applications & Research Associates Inc. (SARA) has built a device that will make internal organs resonate: The effects can run from discomfort to damage or death. If used to protect an area, its beams would make intruders increasingly uncomfortable the closer they get. "We have built several prototypes," says Parviz Parhami, SARA's CEO. Such acoustic fences, he says, could be deployed today. He estimates that five to 10 years will be needed to develop acoustic rifles and other more exotic weapons, but adds, "I have heard people as optimistic as one to two years." The military also envisions acoustic fields being used to control riots or to clear paths for convoys.
SARA's acoustic devices have already been tested at the Camp Pendleton
Marine Corps Base, near the company's
Toward the end of World War II, the Germans were reported to have made a
different type of acoustic device. It looked like a large cannon and sent out a
sonic boomlike shock wave that in theory could have felled a B-17 bomber. In
the mid-1940s, the U.S. Navy created a program called Project Squid to study
the German vortex technology. The results are unknown. But Guy Obolensky, an
American inventor, says he replicated the Nazi device in his laboratory in
1949. Against hard objects the effect was astounding, he says: It could snap a
board like a twig. Against soft targets like people, it had a different effect.
"I felt like I had been hit by a thick rubber blanket," says
Obolensky, who once stood in its path. The idea seemed to founder for years
until recently, when the military was intrigued by its nonlethal possibilities.
The Army and Navy now have vortex projects underway. The SARA lab has tested
its prototype device at
Electromagnetic heat
The Soviets were known to have potent blinding lasers. They were also feared to have developed acoustic and radio-wave weapons. The 1987 issue of Soviet Military Power, a cold war Pentagon publication, warned that the Soviets might be close to "a prototype short-range tactical RF [radio frequency] weapon." The Washington Post reported that year that the Soviets had used such weapons to kill goats at 1 kilometer's range. The Pentagon, it turns out, has been pursuing similar devices since the 1960s.
Typical of some of the more exotic proposals are those from Clay Easterly. Last December, Easterly--who works at the Health Sciences Research Division of Oak Ridge National Laboratory--briefed the Marine Corps on work he had conducted for the National Institute of Justice, which does research on crime control. One of the projects he suggested was an electromagnetic gun that would "induce epilepticlike seizures." Another was a "thermal gun [that] would have the operational effect of heating the body to 105 to 107" degrees Fahrenheit. Such effects would bring on discomfort, fevers, or even death.
But, unlike the work on blinding lasers and acoustic weapons, progress here
has been slow. The biggest problem is power. High-powered microwaves intended
to heat someone standing 200 yards away to 105 degrees Fahrenheit may kill
someone standing 10 yards away. On the other hand, electromagnetic fields
weaken quickly with distance from the source. And beams of such energy are
difficult to direct to their target. Mission Research Corp. of
Nonetheless, government laboratories and private contractors are pursuing
numerous similar programs. A 1996 Air Force Scientific Advisory Board report on
future weapons, for instance, includes a classified section on a radio
frequency or "RF Gunship." Other military documents confirm that
radio-frequency antipersonnel weapons programs are underway. And the Air
Force's Armstrong Laboratory at Brooks Air Force Base in
Low-frequency sleep
From 1980 to 1983, a man named Eldon Byrd ran the Marine Corps Nonlethal
Electromagnetic Weapons project. He conducted most of his research at the Armed
Forces Radiobiology Research Institute in
By using very low frequency electromagnetic radiation--the waves way below radio frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum--he found he could induce the brain to release behavior-regulating chemicals. "We could put animals into a stupor," he says, by hitting them with these frequencies. "We got chick brains--in vitro--to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their brains," Byrd says. He even ran a small project that used magnetic fields to cause certain brain cells in rats to release histamine. In humans, this would cause instant flulike symptoms and produce nausea. "These fields were extremely weak. They were undetectable," says Byrd. "The effects were nonlethal and reversible. You could disable a person temporarily," Byrd hypothesizes. "It [would have been] like a stun gun."
Byrd never tested any of his hardware in the field, and his program,
scheduled for four years, apparently was closed down after two, he says.
"The work was really outstanding," he grumbles. "We would have
had a weapon in one year." Byrd says he was told his work would be unclassified,
"unless it works." Because it worked, he suspects that the program
"went black." Other scientists tell similar tales of research on
electromagnetic radiation turning top secret once successful results were
achieved. There are clues that such work is continuing. In 1995, the annual
meeting of four-star U.S. Air Force generals--called
Direct contact
As the military continues its search for nonlethal weapons, one device that works on contact has already hit the streets. It is called the "Pulse Wave Myotron." A sales video shows it in action. A big, thuggish-looking "criminal" approaches a well-dressed woman. As he tries to choke her, she touches him with a white device about the size of a pack of cigarettes. He falls to the floor in a fetal position, seemingly paralyzed but with eyes open, and he does not recover for minutes.
"Contact with the Myotron," says the narrator, "feels like millions of tiny needles are sent racing through the body. This is a result of scrambling the signals from the motor cortex region of the brain," he says. "It is horrible," says William Gunby, CEO of the company that developed the Myotron. "It is no toy." The Myotron overrides voluntary--but not involuntary--muscle movements, so the victim's vital functions are maintained. Sales are targeted at women, but law enforcement officers and agencies--including the Arizona state police and bailiffs with the New York Supreme Court--have purchased the device, Gunby says. A special model built for law enforcement, called the Black Widow, is being tested by the FBI, he says. "I hope they don't order a lot soon," he adds. "The Russian government just ordered 100,000 of them, and I need to replenish my stock."
The U.S. military also has shown interest in the Myotron. "About the time of the gulf war, I got calls from people in the military," recalls Gunby. "They asked me about bonding the Myotron's pulse wave to a laser beam so that everyone in the path of the laser would collapse." While it could not be done, Gunby says, he nonetheless was warned to keep quiet. "I was told that these calls were totally confidential," he says, "and that they would completely deny it if I ever mentioned it."
Some say such secrecy is necessary in new-weapons development. But others
think it is a mistake. "Because the programs are secret, the sponsorship
is low level, and the technology is unconventional," says William Arkin of
Human Rights Watch Arms Project, "the military has not done any of the
things to determine if the money is being well spent or the programs are a good
idea." It should not be long before the evidence is in.
[END]