Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 From: Deadsmile@hotmail.com (Josh)
A N G E L F I R E KISKC SOME MAJOR ASS I ALOS HAVE OTHER PAGES WHAT XOOM AND GEOSH*TIES BUT ANGELFIRE HAS MOR MB's >>>>>>>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 From: email@example.com (Mike Nieman)
One provision for being censored involves the following: 3.lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value. Thus, using this standard, I ask you who should determine whether a webpage meet these criteria? Surely you can see that censorship of material that is not illegal is wrong? In fact, I question whether even 10% of the user webpages at Angelfire would meet even the barest definition of these values.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 From: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi, I think your page is great! What a wonderful service to provide (the comparisons). I have a home page with Tripod and I think they are great! You should check out some of there new features, they now have a cgi bin, and have shortened there urls even more (example: http://USERNAME. tripod.com) how great is that?! The only complaint I have about tripod is the pop up ad's they are really anoying, but for all the other services they offer I can live with them. I have a request... I was searching for a web site host that offered free sites for commercial use, I found one called Crosswinds. Could you please include them in your comparison? Thank You! micki