from: Shirley <email@example.com> date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998
Why ANYONE would hate Angelfire is beyond me. When I first started to build websites, I had an account on both Angelfire and Geocities, and Angelfire was the only one that could show me basice HTML so that I could get started. That, and Angelfire has a much better graphics directory, and it's MUCH less confusing (that's helpful to blondes like me ;)). Anyway. Angelfire is the easiest, and the best free homepage service that there is!
from: firstname.lastname@example.org date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998
It's interesting to note that 75% of the Anti-Angelfire page has been censored by its webpage provider. Ironic, is it not? Makes the anti-angelfire contingent look a bit silly. i myself don't have an opinion about angelfire, but I am looking for a new free webpage provider. . .I am tiring of geocities. If you have time, could you make any suggestions or give me some info, since you seem to be very well versed in most of the larger providers? All I can find thus far is the page provider itself saying "we are great" with the exception of this angelfire debate. jesickah
from: email@example.com date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998
Come on now. Don't poke fun at FortuneCity for their spelling. I found a couple of mistakes on your pages. Nobody's perfect. Anyhow, thanks for backing something you believe in.
from: firstname.lastname@example.org date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998
I like also Angelfire. They don't make me show their banners. They haven't refused any of my pictures. My page is in Turkish and I haven't lost my page for 6 months. The only thing that I don't like with Angelfire's service is its so slowly working web shell. They don't give us chance to operate on several files. They should expand their services through cgi-hosting, better file manager, java files hosting. Even if they don't, I'm happy with Angelfire for 6 months.