Some thoughts on libraries and the censored minority
I recently encountered a publication by a group that stands against the mainstream media (publishers, booksellers, and libraries among them). This group believes that the most important and interesting works of literature are never published and remain unread. How would you know, if they have never been read? More importantly, this group, which is the proponent for the minority viewpoint and unpublished authors, refuses to accept submissions for printing in their periodical. Does this not seem hypocritical? Granted, being of the library world, my viewpoint is supposedly both mainstream and therefore at odds with this particular organization's beliefs (which are stated in their manifesto).
A cynic would denounce the group as a bunch of rejected authors who are now grousing over their collective bad luck and passing these sour grapes on through their self-published organ. But that is what free speech is about. Everyone is entitled to speak their piece. Being in a capitalistic, market society, the trouble is getting that message heard by more than those in the same room with you. Again, this is seen as one the imperialist evils keeping them down. The Internet has become to many a means of equalizing things and allowing a fairly equal voice to all. Of course, with the growing commercialization of search engines, this may be of decreasing value as, once again, only those users with your particular URL can find your site.
Sadly, minority rights and free speech often are eclipsed by another one of the great American institutions, majority rule by election. Though debacles such as the 2000 presidential election may cause us all to doubt the veracity of that as well.
I recall something taught in a class on collection development. As a rule, a selector of information (be it physical or electronic) should always strive to choose at least 20% of these resources from a point of view that you totally disagree with or are very uncomfortable with. By doing so, a collection of information will hopefully not be overly skewed toward one viewpoint or another. It is a starting place for making the library a place of well-represented viewpoints.
However, there are increasing pressures to make libraries customer-demand driven. How else will the library compete with bookstores and the Internet, is the argument. As this is becoming more and more the norm for library service, those minority voices will again be lost in the clamor for the latest popular novel. A librarian must serve their customers, no question about it. But the librarian must also work to impact their customers and broadening their horizons. Readers' advisory is one service in demand that can provide a means for introducing the minority voice into the mainstream.
So to this group of underground writers and poets and essayists, I say that libraries can be a part of their support group. They must speak as loud as they can in order to be heard over the dominant demands being placed upon libraries today. But the library can be the place where their voice is heard by more than their fellow oppressed comrades. Over time, a minority can become a majority. Look at how "alternative" music became the popular demand in rock music. To everything, there is a season.