"I salute you, sir:--I was born in Jerusalem, in the year 2 B. C, as it is now called. I was the highpriest of the Jews, from A. D. 45 to A. D. 65. My name was Ananias. You will find a brief account of my doings in the twenty-fourth chapter of Acts. I was one of the accusers of Apollonius before Felix. The name ought to have been Apollos, instead of Paul. The charge that was there set down against him was, that he was a seditious and pestilent fellow. That was not the charge made against him at all. The charge was that he had attempted to enter the Holy of Holies, claiming the divine right to do so. When the priests and populace attempted to restrain him, and keep him from entering there, such was his power that he entered the Holy of Holies, and none present could stop him. We called this power, the power of God, but you people call it mediumship. It was for this I accused him before Felix. He had violated and profaned the temple, and I accused him of it. As a spirit I must confess that I was more governed in this by a feeling of jealousy than anything else. The Jews had sworn to destroy him, but he had proselyted a great number of them to his faith. [What faith was that?] It was the faith of Christos or Chrishna. You read of Paul or Apollos having been let down from the walls of Damascus, in a basket; but that occurred at Jerusalem and not at Damascus. From A. D. 35 to A. D. 65, the only Christ that was preached in Judea was the Christos of Apollonius. [Of what faith by name was Apollonius?] He belonged to the Essenes. The Essenes were not Jews, as has been wrongly supposed. Any person who followed their teachings could join the Essenes, no matter what his or her nationality. This Apollos or Apollonius, was summoned before Felix and his wife Drusilla, where he produced such extraordinary spirit manifestations, that as he [Felix] could not let him go, not having the power to do so, he did the next best thing for Apollos, and kept him in prison until his successor arrived, where he was sent to Rome where he was liberated. I am Ananias son of Nebedus. I am particular in telling you this, because there was another highpriest of the Jews about that time who was named Ananias."
Refer to Nouvelle Biographie Generale for account of Charles Martel.
Refer to Biographie Universelle, article Charles Martel, for account of Radbod. We deem it best before commenting upon this communication from Radbod to give the communication of Winifred, or St. Boniface, as the two communications are so intimately connected with the same points of ancient history as to make their joint consideration most desirable.
I greet you sir:--It is strange that the Catholics of to-day claim me as having been one of the expounders of their doctrines. They are wide of their mark. I was a priest of Christos. I was born in 680 A. D. and died about 734 or 736. I had three disciples. One of them went to Britain, another through Germany, and Swivert, the third, went to Friesland, with what success the king of that country (Radbod) has informed you. The other two met with failures. I had a good deal to do with influencing the zeal of the Christosite division of Charles Martel's army. In fact my position in that matter was similar to that of Peter the Hermit toward the Crusade in after years. I belonged to the religious faith which I called reformed Christosism, and, as it was taught by me, it was set forth in the books that were rejected at the Council of Nice. In that way I was at war, spiritually speaking, with the teachers of the original Christosism--my position being about the same toward them as Martin Luther's position was towards Catholicism. About the only remnants of my teachings now extant, are to be found among the Maronites of Mt. Lebanon. I believe, and in fact I may say that I know, that the books rejected at the Council of Nice were of more importance as truly defining Christosism, than those which were adopted. My original name was Winfred. It was afterwards changed to Boniface. I was a Briton. I was born in the vicinity of what is called Durham."
Refer to Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography for account of Severus. "Of the numerous works of Severus only fragments remain." In these references to Severus and the part he had to shaping the Christian religion, to which we refer our readers, we have all that his orthodox Christian enemies have permitted to come down to us concerning these interesting subjects. Read by the light thrown upon them by the foregoing communication, we can well understand why so little has been permitted to reach us concerning Severus and his times. It is questionable whether Severus could properly claim to be the founder of the doctrine of Monophysites, as he says he was. It is, however, very certain that he was the founder of that phase of Monophysitism which refused all toleration of the orthodox Christian doctrine. It is an important point of the testimony of Spirit Severus when he tells us that, at Antioch, as late as A. D. 513 and perhaps as late as 538 that the idea of Hesus Christos being a Jew was ridiculed by the Syrian descendants of the Phoenicians who were worshippers of IES or JES, the sun god. This was no doubt the fact, and it shows that such a thing as orthodox Christianity had not at that late date been firmly established. The pretence that it had prevailed five hundred years earlier is wholly untenable.
Refer to Biographie Universelle for account of John Biddle. Who can say how far the Spirit of John Biddle has not had a hand in setting on foot and maintaining the movement known as Modern Spiritualism. He explains how it was that at the risk of his life, and all that a man holds dear, he defied the power of the priestly, bigoted Christians of his time and denounced doctrines of the Holy Trinity as untrue. He says his doctrines were founded on the same facts which support Modern Spiritualism, to wit: The spirit life, spirit return, and spirit communion with mortals, with the exception that he regarded those returning spirits as angels. Under such inspiration he was made bold to defy the whole power of the English priesthood. There is no mention of Biddle having been confined, at the time of his death, for the non-payment of one hundred pounds sterling. With that exception the communication is in remarkable accord with what has been recorded concerning him. It is a demonstrated fact, that by their persecutions in the past, the Christian Churches, Catholic and Protestant, have been filling the spirit world with enemies who will yet see the utter overthrow of the power that they have so cruelly and unscrupulously labored to perpetuate.
By way of consolation to this spirit, we assured him that he was widely mistaken in supposing, that in nearly every instance, the testimony of those apostate spirits had not already been proven true, and that his own spirit admissions would furnish the best possible proof of their truthfulness. Even this bigoted and admitted enemy of truth found himself incapable of falsifying in our presence, knowing, as he did, that the information we had received and disclosed, to be what he desired most to conceal from the world. Refer to McClintock and Strong's Cyclopedia of Theological Literature for account of St. Francis de Sales. The spirit of St. Francis de Sales could in no manner have more pointedly identified himself than by giving an account of his efforts to win the aged Beza to the Roman Catholic Church. St. Francis evidently considered that particular service as being the most meritorious of his zealous and certainly most remarkable efforts on behalf of his religion. Even he could not deny the correctness of the spirit information which had been given to us in relation to Apollonius of Tyana, the God Christos of the Hindoos, and the God Hesus of the Gallic Druids. His lame attempt to take comfort from the fact that so much of evidence in support of those things had been destroyed, or was in the private keeping of the Roman Church, showed most clearly what a desperate strait has been forced upon the spirit defenders of Christianity by these remarkable spirit testimonies. I will only add that the name of this spirit was given by the guide of the medium, or we would never have known from what spirit it came. [The character, purposes and unscrupulous nature of St. Francis de Sales as an individual, are fully set forth in his characteristic communication. The admissions he makes as to the priests of his church covering their tracks well is true to life, also to the fact that the valuable manuscripts bearing upon the true history of so-called Christianity are in the possession of the Church, except what have been destroyed. This Spirit is a fair representative of the Church at large.--Compiler.]