ANANIAS.

A Jewish High Priest.


"I salute you, sir:--I was born in Jerusalem, in the year 2 B. C, as it is now called. I was the highpriest of the Jews, from A. D. 45 to A. D. 65. My name was Ananias. You will find a brief account of my doings in the twenty-fourth chapter of Acts. I was one of the accusers of Apollonius before Felix. The name ought to have been Apollos, instead of Paul. The charge that was there set down against him was, that he was a seditious and pestilent fellow. That was not the charge made against him at all. The charge was that he had attempted to enter the Holy of Holies, claiming the divine right to do so. When the priests and populace attempted to restrain him, and keep him from entering there, such was his power that he entered the Holy of Holies, and none present could stop him. We called this power, the power of God, but you people call it mediumship. It was for this I accused him before Felix. He had violated and profaned the temple, and I accused him of it. As a spirit I must confess that I was more governed in this by a feeling of jealousy than anything else. The Jews had sworn to destroy him, but he had proselyted a great number of them to his faith. [What faith was that?] It was the faith of Christos or Chrishna. You read of Paul or Apollos having been let down from the walls of Damascus, in a basket; but that occurred at Jerusalem and not at Damascus. From A. D. 35 to A. D. 65, the only Christ that was preached in Judea was the Christos of Apollonius. [Of what faith by name was Apollonius?] He belonged to the Essenes. The Essenes were not Jews, as has been wrongly supposed. Any person who followed their teachings could join the Essenes, no matter what his or her nationality. This Apollos or Apollonius, was summoned before Felix and his wife Drusilla, where he produced such extraordinary spirit manifestations, that as he [Felix] could not let him go, not having the power to do so, he did the next best thing for Apollos, and kept him in prison until his successor arrived, where he was sent to Rome where he was liberated. I am Ananias son of Nebedus. I am particular in telling you this, because there was another highpriest of the Jews about that time who was named Ananias."


CHARLES MARTEL.

King of France.


"I will salute you by saying:--I hope the truth will triumph although it has many opponents. I was a warrior--not a priest. I am known as Charles Martel. I was the grandfather of Charlemagne, and secretly--not openly--a materialist in my belief. I overcame the Saracens in battle; for which I am heartily sorry as a spirit, for I believe that my victory over them kept Spiritualism back, for a thousand years. And what a singular army it was that I commanded! It was in three divisions, each of which had to be kept entirely separated from the others, or they would have killed each other about their different religious beliefs. The first division was composed of troops drawn from what you term Italy, Greece, and in fact from all the countries along the shores of the Meditteranean Sea. Their religion was the worship of Jupiter and their standard an imitation of your plow. The second division was drawn from Gaul and Germany, and they were worshippers of Christos. Their battle standard bore the figure of a lamb. The third division came from Britain and Scandinavia and their standard had upon it a pine or some other evergreen tree. They were worshippers of Hesus. Those were the principal religions of my time; and there was much similarity between the last two mentioned. The followers of Jupiter were distinguished for their multiplicity of gods, as every force in nature and every human passion had its presiding god or goddess. You may imagine the difficulty that I labored under to have to control these three hostile forces and to use them without allowing them to intermingle. Their religious hatred of each other would have overcame them much sooner than the enemy could have done it. The spirit who will follow me, will be Radbod. We always fought against each other when we happened to meet; but as spirits we are endeavoring to pave the way for a true knowledge of the past, in relation to the Christian Church. As I before said, as a spirit, I have one grand regret, and that is, that I ever stopped the advance of the Saracens.--Fraternally, Charles Martel."

Refer to Nouvelle Biographie Generale for account of Charles Martel.


RADBOD.

King of Friesland.


"I will greet you for the spirit for whom I will speak. I will also greet you for myself--Aronamar. The spirit for whom I will speak, drove out from his domains a disciple of Boniface's who came there to convert his people from Hesusism to Christosism. He says his name was Swivert. He says he heard all that this Swivert had to say, and he became convinced from that that he had originally gotten his religion from Hesusism, and Christosism was only an offshoot of Hesusism; but as a spirit he has found that the reverse of this is true. On his driving out this Swivert, he went back to Charles Martel and enlisted him in his favor, and this finally brought on a war that had for its object the establishment in Friesland of the religion that was taught by Boniface. But finally it became the desire of Charles Martel to possess the whole of the territory of Friesland, and they contended for the remainder of their lives for the supremacy over it, sometimes one gaining and sometimes the other. This Radbod says that Hesus, as he understood the matter, was not the god of their religion. He acted in the same capacity for them that Apollonius did for the Greeks and Romans in bringing the Hindoo gospels into the Roman provinces. Hesus brought the same gospels to Marseilles about B. C. 800. He was a merchant, or trader, but became a propagator of the doctrines of Hesusism. The book from which he taught was called Arjouna, after Arjun the disciple of Christos. As the name of Pauline Epistles was given to the writings of Apollonius, so they gave the name of Hesus to similar writings which were given to his disciples and carried all over Northern Europe. Therefore, Hesusism began eight hundred years before the Christian era; Christosism did not begin in Western Europe until seven hundred years after that era. Hesusism had gained a great ascendency there and had some of the finest schools in Ireland and Gaul, and was ardently taught by St. Patrick and others. The communicating spirit says this is given you to be published, so that there can be some light as to his times to those who are not too blind to see. His name is Radbod."

Refer to Biographie Universelle, article Charles Martel, for account of Radbod.

We deem it best before commenting upon this communication from Radbod to give the communication of Winifred, or St. Boniface, as the two communications are so intimately connected with the same points of ancient history as to make their joint consideration most desirable.


WINFRED--OR ST. BONIFACE.

A So-called Christian Saint.


I greet you sir:--It is strange that the Catholics of to-day claim me as having been one of the expounders of their doctrines. They are wide of their mark. I was a priest of Christos. I was born in 680 A. D. and died about 734 or 736. I had three disciples. One of them went to Britain, another through Germany, and Swivert, the third, went to Friesland, with what success the king of that country (Radbod) has informed you. The other two met with failures. I had a good deal to do with influencing the zeal of the Christosite division of Charles Martel's army. In fact my position in that matter was similar to that of Peter the Hermit toward the Crusade in after years. I belonged to the religious faith which I called reformed Christosism, and, as it was taught by me, it was set forth in the books that were rejected at the Council of Nice. In that way I was at war, spiritually speaking, with the teachers of the original Christosism--my position being about the same toward them as Martin Luther's position was towards Catholicism. About the only remnants of my teachings now extant, are to be found among the Maronites of Mt. Lebanon. I believe, and in fact I may say that I know, that the books rejected at the Council of Nice were of more importance as truly defining Christosism, than those which were adopted. My original name was Winfred. It was afterwards changed to Boniface. I was a Briton. I was born in the vicinity of what is called Durham."

[Comments]


LUCIUS OF CYRENE.

The Secretary of Damis or Demas.


"Peace be with you:--My name, in the mortal life was Lucius of Cyrene. I was the disciple of Apollonius and one of the greatest propagators of the Apollonian Christosite religion. I had three different names, owing to the different languages in which it was written--Lucius, Lucas and Luke. I was the writer or transcriber of the Life of Apollonius, as dictated by Damis or Demas. It was I, who helped him to write all those epistles in the New Covenant. The four Gospels were translated from the Sanscrit by Apollonius, and they were sent out by him in four different languages--the Greek, the Roman, the Armenian, and the Syriac Hebraic. The Apocalypse was written by Apollonius himself. The other books were in the form they were dictated to me by Damis and as transcribed by me. I copied them in the Cappadocian tongue, which was a mixture of Greek and Syriac. I am referred to at first as Lucius of Cyrene, in Acts xiii, 1. The second place I am referred to is, in Rom. xvi, 21. I am also referred to in Col. iv, 13, as, "Luke the beloved physician," and Phil. verse 24, as Lucas. I have been called by those different names. It was Lucian the Satirist who afterwards placed these things in their present shape. Lucian and Marcion were the St. Luke and St. Mark of the Christian Scriptures. Apollonius was deified by the Romans and his statue was set up in the Temple of Jupiter. That is all I can now say. I thank you for the privilege."


SEVERUS.

Patriarch of Antioch.


"I greet you sir, by saying:--Our efforts are directed towards such points we think will be likely to attract attention and cause thought. In this mortal life I bore the name of Severus. I was the founder of a sect of Monophysites--a foolish sect, continually in my time and afterwards contending about the Trinity. We were then trying to shape the Christian religion as it now stands. The greatest difficulty that I found at Antioch was when we undertook to make Hesus Christos a Jew. When we taught that, we were frequently mocked and ridiculed. Even the most ignorant people of those times had their traditions and it was difficult to make them relinquish the teachings of their forefathers. When in the mortal form I never thought that this Christian system would gain the foothold it has to-day. I used it in my earth life simply because I thought it was better than the religions of the numerous gods that were worshipped by the people. There was one Jacob, a Syrian, who did much more than myself to place the Monophysites in power; but they lost all they had gained in a short time after his death. One Felix II, a pope or bishop, I think, finally exterminated them. And so ended, when my sect ended, my connection as a spirit with this mortal plane. Since that time I have never returned to this earth until you see me here to-day. Myself and all my followers now belong to the school of Plotinus in the spirit life. We are Spiritualists in this way: We do not think spirits have any right to meddle in mortal affairs for evil, and try to intercept all meddling spirits who bring nothing but confusion to earth's people; and in this way we hope to help you. There is nothing worse for mortals than babbling and foolish spirits. That all of us may be blessed with the sunlight of truth is my greatest hope and most earnest desire."

Refer to Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography for account of Severus.

"Of the numerous works of Severus only fragments remain."

In these references to Severus and the part he had to shaping the Christian religion, to which we refer our readers, we have all that his orthodox Christian enemies have permitted to come down to us concerning these interesting subjects. Read by the light thrown upon them by the foregoing communication, we can well understand why so little has been permitted to reach us concerning Severus and his times. It is questionable whether Severus could properly claim to be the founder of the doctrine of Monophysites, as he says he was. It is, however, very certain that he was the founder of that phase of Monophysitism which refused all toleration of the orthodox Christian doctrine. It is an important point of the testimony of Spirit Severus when he tells us that, at Antioch, as late as A. D. 513 and perhaps as late as 538 that the idea of Hesus Christos being a Jew was ridiculed by the Syrian descendants of the Phoenicians who were worshippers of IES or JES, the sun god. This was no doubt the fact, and it shows that such a thing as orthodox Christianity had not at that late date been firmly established. The pretence that it had prevailed five hundred years earlier is wholly untenable.


AGABUS.

A Supposed Christian Prophet.


"I salute you, sir:--My name was Agabus. In Acts xi, 27, 28, you have an account of me as fortelling a famine in Judea. In reading that chapter you are led to suppose that I came from Jerusalem, which was not the case. I was an Armenian and a proselyte to the doctrines of Apollonius the Cappadocian. I was won to that faith through the logic or teachings of Damis or Demas. Our meetings in those days were simply for the brethren to give way to the spirit; and you will notice that after all those meetings, some who attended were sent in one direction and some in another, but in all cases the most powerful mediums were sent to the most skeptical people. In this laid the success of the Apollonian religion. Apollonius, as well as Damis and his other disciples knew that success was to be won by evidence. Apollonius learned this from the Gymnosophists of India; and for that reason, in the first and second centuries, they used mediums to propagate their system. The followers of the religion of Apollonius, treating of Christos or the Indian Christ, were made up of nearly all the nations that he could then reach, and in fact had very little to do with the Jews, who are made to appear, by the Christian books, to have been the principal adherents of that religion. The fact is that the most powerful propagators of it were Greeks and Romans; and that is why you find most of the epistles written in Greek or Latin. These two nations and those tributary to them were the most powerful adherents of the Christosite Apollonian system. You will notice that I do not call any of these movements religions, but only systems, because there can be no religion, as I have found out as a spirit, but that which is founded on the scientific book of nature. This idea of a descent of God among men, or of men being god-made, is something that all humanity will have to get rid of, and the sooner they do it the better. I passed to spirit life in A. D. 97."


JOHN BIDDLE.

An English Theologian.


"Good day, sir:--During my mortal life I was a Socinian writer. My name was John Biddle. I was many times in jail for denying the truth of the Trinity; and I finally died in jail, of what is termed jail fever, and all because I could not raise one hundred pounds sterling. To convey to your mind any idea of the indignation I feel at the way I was treated by the Christians would be utterly impossible. They knew, as did President Bradshaw, my most bitter opponent, that what I asserted was the truth. My doctrines were founded upon the same facts that your Modern Spiritualism rests upon, with this exception that what you call spirits, I called angels. All this drew upon me the hatred and malice of the priests of my time, who petitioned parliament and the king to have my teachings suppressed. My writings were burned. But since I entered spirit life I gathered around me a force of congenial spirits, and if I do not succeed in making my mark upon the Christian Church before long, it will not be because I have not tried hard enough to do it. I would say to you, foster skepticism wherever you can, for it is the axe that will cut down the tree of superstition. I am sorry to see your difficulties, sir, and that you find so few helpers in your battle for truth. I was thrown into prison in May, and died there in September 1662."

Refer to Biographie Universelle for account of John Biddle.

Who can say how far the Spirit of John Biddle has not had a hand in setting on foot and maintaining the movement known as Modern Spiritualism. He explains how it was that at the risk of his life, and all that a man holds dear, he defied the power of the priestly, bigoted Christians of his time and denounced doctrines of the Holy Trinity as untrue. He says his doctrines were founded on the same facts which support Modern Spiritualism, to wit: The spirit life, spirit return, and spirit communion with mortals, with the exception that he regarded those returning spirits as angels. Under such inspiration he was made bold to defy the whole power of the English priesthood. There is no mention of Biddle having been confined, at the time of his death, for the non-payment of one hundred pounds sterling. With that exception the communication is in remarkable accord with what has been recorded concerning him. It is a demonstrated fact, that by their persecutions in the past, the Christian Churches, Catholic and Protestant, have been filling the spirit world with enemies who will yet see the utter overthrow of the power that they have so cruelly and unscrupulously labored to perpetuate.


ST. FRANCIS DE SALES.

A Bishop and Priest of Geneva.


"I greet you sir:--When here, I never hesitated to preach the truth in the presence of heretics. I wish to ask you how you, a small body of people and in so small a minority, expect, successfully, to beard the powerful Catholic Church? What does it matter, even if you know the truth in relation to Apollonius of Tyana, or in regard to Crishna Hesus, or the other gods? You forget that all the valuable manuscripts concerning them are in possession of our church. You will need proof to show that your standpoint is correct; and like many of the Protestant Churches (all of which are nothing more than bastard churches) it will appear that it has nothing more to support it but the sayings and doings of a lecherous monk. You may know, when I tried to convert the famous Theodore Beza, on his death bed, to the Catholic faith, that I was in earnest about propagating my religion when here, and I am yet so in spirit life. The priests of my church have hidden their tracks well, and it will cost an immense outlay of time and money to prove that these apostate spirits have been communicating to you the truth. You cannot do it, and I challenge you to the trial."

By way of consolation to this spirit, we assured him that he was widely mistaken in supposing, that in nearly every instance, the testimony of those apostate spirits had not already been proven true, and that his own spirit admissions would furnish the best possible proof of their truthfulness. Even this bigoted and admitted enemy of truth found himself incapable of falsifying in our presence, knowing, as he did, that the information we had received and disclosed, to be what he desired most to conceal from the world.

Refer to McClintock and Strong's Cyclopedia of Theological Literature for account of St. Francis de Sales.

The spirit of St. Francis de Sales could in no manner have more pointedly identified himself than by giving an account of his efforts to win the aged Beza to the Roman Catholic Church. St. Francis evidently considered that particular service as being the most meritorious of his zealous and certainly most remarkable efforts on behalf of his religion. Even he could not deny the correctness of the spirit information which had been given to us in relation to Apollonius of Tyana, the God Christos of the Hindoos, and the God Hesus of the Gallic Druids. His lame attempt to take comfort from the fact that so much of evidence in support of those things had been destroyed, or was in the private keeping of the Roman Church, showed most clearly what a desperate strait has been forced upon the spirit defenders of Christianity by these remarkable spirit testimonies. I will only add that the name of this spirit was given by the guide of the medium, or we would never have known from what spirit it came.

[The character, purposes and unscrupulous nature of St. Francis de Sales as an individual, are fully set forth in his characteristic communication. The admissions he makes as to the priests of his church covering their tracks well is true to life, also to the fact that the valuable manuscripts bearing upon the true history of so-called Christianity are in the possession of the Church, except what have been destroyed. This Spirit is a fair representative of the Church at large.--Compiler.]


SILAS OR SILVANUS.

A Disciple, not of Jesus, but of Apollonius of Tyana.


"I greet you, sir:--I was one of the most intimate disciples of Apollonius of Tyana, sometimes called Paulinus, Paul and Apollos, according to the different dialects of the various countries which he visited. About the first mention of me, you will find in the 15th Chapter of Acts, 22d verse. You will also find mention of me in the 1st verse of 1st Thessalonians. The book of Acts, is set down by the best commentators as having been written about A. D. 59, while the Epistle of the Thessalonians is set down for A. D. 52. Both of these statements are wrong. The 1st Thessalonians was written about in A. D. 40; and portions of Acts about A. D. 60--other parts of it later. It never assumed its present shape until the time of Lucian. The 1st Epistle to the Thessalonians was the first ever written by Apollonius; and you will note, if you examine that epistle, that he does not charge the Thessalonians with those vices that are named in the other epistles. The reason for this is very simple when understood. It was because the Thessalonians were Chrestus-Christosites, Thessalonica being the capital of ancient Macedonia, and he, Apollonius, had made a few converts there. He had to write to them very kindly, fearing that they would go back to their old teacher, Chrestus. The propagation of the Apollonian system of Christosism was opposed by the Greek Promethean system, and by the teachings of Chrestus concerning Christos; and also by an Ethiopian version, of which you will hear more hereafter, from the spirits. I think I have said all that can be of benefit or that I can now recall this morning. Yours for the truth, Silvanus, surnamed Silas.


FRUMENTIUS.

An Abyssinian Bishop.


I salute you, sir:--My name is Frumentius. I was an Abyssinian bishop in the fourth century, and the original writer of the Ethiopic version of Christosism, as contained in the four gospels received by a pagan priest of the sun, not historically named, from Calanus, in the days of Alexander the Great. I was a sun worshipper myself and so understood the matter that I regarded Christos as the Child of the Sun. In my day it was a common thing to believe that all the pure spirits of the dead upon this earth passed to the sun. Consequently, I wrote this Ethiopian version to show that the god of the sun, in his kindness, sent his son here, to die for the sins of mortals. If my version had been left intact this would clearly have appeared to those who read it; but as will be explained by a spirit who will come after me, and by tricks well known to Christians, they left just so much of my record stand as suited the propagation of their own faith. The rest was destroyed; how, will be explained by a spirit before these sittings are ended. Bless you for the good work you are doing; but you will find that none are so blind as those who will not see."


CHRESTUS.

The Rival of Apollonius of Tyana.


At my weekly sitting with the medium and before the communication from Chrestus was given, the guide of the medium took control and said--"Mr. Roberts, the spirit who is here to communicate is one who has something very important to say to you, and Aronomar is so anxious that you should understand this, that he will take control of the medium himself for a moment." Aronomar through the medium, addressed me as follows:

I greet you:--In this work in which we are both engaged, you doing your part and I mine, I have now to show you that we do not wish to set Apollonius up as a god or christ; and the spirit I am about to introduce to you, will show you that his claim for special consideration was the fearless advocacy and maintenance of his ideas. The spirit who is about to take control of the medium will give you the particulars concerning the doings of himself and Apollonius. He was opposed by Apollonius, and can tell you about him, as well as about himself. You can ask him any questions you desire to have answered, because I have concentrated a very strong force around the medium, and I think we can sustain the spirit until you have done with questioning him."

Here Aronomar yielded the control to the spirit, and the following astonishing communication was given:

"I salute you, sir:--In the time of Claudius Caesar, I was at Rome, engaged in propagating the Gymnosophic ideas in relation to the Indian Christos in contradistinction to the ideas of Apollonius of Tyana, in relation to him. He taught the reformed Buddhist doctrines concerning him, while I taught the Brahmanical doctrines. The difference between the two doctrines were simply, that according to Apollonius's way of teaching, mankind were to depend mainly, or solely, upon Christos as their Saviour; in my way of teaching, Christos could only be their Saviour provided their good works and deeds accompanied a belief in him. My idea was the same as that of genuine Christianity, to-day, in relation to salvation. Apollonius taught the doctrines of Universalism. In order to stop all progress in the direction of my teachings, Apollonius, Paulines or Apollos, went and stopped with Aquila and Priscilla, and worked with them, while his agents or followers worked against me at Rome. At the time this agitation occurred, there was an edict issued by the emperor Claudius which ordered the expulsion of all Jews from Rome, as Suetonius has been made to record it; but this is an interpolation by Christian writers to conceal my historical identity. This passage in Suetonius has greatly bothered your modern theologians, Adam Clark, Dr. Lardner, and other commentators, to know whether Christ, so-called, was ever at Rome. I was the man who was at that time in Rome, and I was the opponent of Apollonius. My name was Chrestus, and it seems strange that with such a name, learned theologians should ever have mistaken me for a Jew. In their zeal to find some evidence to prove that their Christ had an existence, they are ready to accept anything, however irrational and improbable. I was a Macedonian, and a slave to Claudius, but was set free by him on the account of the appeals of my friends and followers. At length I acquired such power and influence by my preaching and teaching the doctrines of Christos, and by my mediumship, which was manifested in support of my teachings, that Claudius expelled myself and all my followers from Rome. It is important that you should thoroughly know what the name Chrestus meant. I was named after what I taught. In the contest between myself and Apollonius, he had more friends than I had; and mainly among the patrician order. He being a freeborn citizen and I having been a slave, of course the whole patrician order worked against me. In order that you may thoroughly understand the import of this communication, I will say that Apollonius received his gospels from India through Iarchus; I received mine directly from Calanus, the teacher of Alexander the Great. When I say I received my gospels directly from Calanus, I mean they came down to me through my ancestors from the time of Alexander, one of whom was with Alexander, and was personally acquainted with Calanus. I was born about A. D. 6, and lived until A. D. 92. [Where did you go on being expelled from Rome?] I went back to my home in Macedonia. [Did you ever meet Damis, the friend and disciple of Apollonius?] I never met him, but I knew of him. He sent me threatening letters commanding me to cease teaching my doctrines. He was then in Thessalonica. [What was your occupation in Macedonia?] I was a scribe to the Macedonian priests, but I was not a follower of the Macedonian religion. I adhered to the Christos religion, as did my ancestors before me. [What was your Macedonian name?] I will have to spell it for you. Ruthalia. I want further to say that the edict against myself and followers was said to be issued against us as Jews, but that term was applied to all persons who we regarded as vagrants or disturbers of the peace and good order of Rome, and not as designating the followers of Judaism. That is why the interpolator of Suetonius chose the name Jews for those people against whom the edict of Claudius was issued. You will find me called Chrestus in Suetonius."


Next

Contents