¡@
¦p¡@»Õ¤U±ý¡G
-
µû»ù¤@¤U¿ûµ^¥Jªºµ¼Ö³y¸Ú¡F
- »P¿ûµ^¥J¤À¨Éµ¼Öªº¤ß±o¡F
- »P¿ûµ^¥J°Q½×µ¼Ö²z½×¡F©Î
- »P¿ûµ^¥J²á¤Ñ¡A
³£Åwªï±zµ¹¿ûµ^¥J¯d¨¥¡C
¡@
Grade 4 PIANO | Grade 5 THOERY | Grade 8 THEORY | Grade 8 PIANO | ATCL in Performance (Solo Piano) |
¡@
Grade 4 PIANO 12 DEC 2000 ¦Ò¸Õ¦±¥Ø
A well chosen
tempo; clear sound and good articulation ¡V everything was well in place, apart from a
slight feeling of hurry at times.
³t«×¿ï¾Ü¨}¦n¡Fµ¦â²M´·¡A¥B³s¸õµ¨}¨Î
¡V
¤@¤Á³£³B²z±o«Ü¦n¡A¦ý¦³¤@ÂI¨à»°®É¶¡ªº·Pı¡C
Sensitively
shaped, with a pleasing sense of ebb and flow ¡V you could afford often to produce more
sound from the instrument ¡V a danger of the notes not
sounding at all in the last line.
§ÎºAÆF±Ó¡Aµ¹¤H¤@ºØ°h¼é©M¬y°Êªº´r§Ö·Pı
¡V ±z±`±`¯à°÷±q¿ûµ^¤¤µo¥X§ó¦hÁnÅT ¡V
¦ý³Ì«á¤@¦æªºµ²Å¨S¦³ÁnÅT¬O¤@ºØ¦M¾÷¡C
This seems rather
fast for a sad story ¡V again, you could play out
more, as it to an audience. Take more time, and let it sound more
element and expressive.
³o¹ï¤@Ó¤£§Öªº¬G¨Æ¡A¦ü¥G¤Ó§Ö¤F
¡V
¦A¦¸¡A±zÀ³¸Ó¼u«µ§ó¦h¡A¦]¬°³o¬Oµ¹Æ[²³ªY½àªº¡C©â¦h¤@ÂI®É¶¡¡AÅý¨äÁnÅT§ó¥[Àu¶®¤Î´I·P±¡¡C
Good sound ¡V well prepared work ¡V the playing flows effectively.
ÁnÅT¨}¦n ¡V
¨}¨Îªº¹w³Æ§@·~ ¡V ¦³¹ê¤O¦a¼u«µµ¶¥ªº¬y°Ê¡C
Mostly accurate
in notes, but with some delays, and given with a very frail tonal
quality ¡V make more of the
expression marks.
¤j³¡¥÷ªºµ³£·Ç½T¡A¦ý¦³¤@ÂI©µ¿ð¡A¥H¤Îµ¹¤©¤@ӫܵê®zªºµ½è
¡V ¯d·N¦h¨Çºt«µ°O¸¹¡C
Accurate
responses, though not always promptly given.
¦^µª·Ç½T¡AÁöµMµª®×¤£¬O¸g±`±Ó±¶¦aµ¹¤©¡C
Promising work ¡V there's every reason for you to shape the
music with greater assurance.
§@·~¤j¦³¥i¬° ¡V
²Å¦Xµ¼Öªº¯µ³Z¦b©ó±zn¦³§ó¤jªº¦Û«H¡C
Grade 5 THEORY 02 JUN 2001 ¸Õ¨÷
¡@
Grade 8 THEORY 02 NOV 2002 ¸Õ¨÷
¡@
Grade 8 PIANO 26 NOV 2002 ¦Ò¸Õ¦±¥Ø
This was positive
and shapely playing with a firm sense of rhythm. Technique was
mostly authoritative ¡V just a few blemishes in
this performances and a need sometimes for a little more light
and shade in the dynamics. There was much to enjoy though. This
was confident playing.
³o¼Ö¦±ªº¼u«µ¬O¦³¦Û«H¤Î¦³§ÎºAªº¡A¦Ó¥B±a¦³Ã©wªº¸`©ç·Pı¡C§Þ¥©¤jP¤W¬O¦Û¥Dªº
¡V ¥u¦³¤Ö³\·å²«©ó¬O¦¸ºt«µ¤W¡C¦¹¥~¡A¦b¤O«×¤W¦³®É¬O»Ýn¦h¤@ÂI¨à¥ú©ú©M·t²Hªº¡C¾¨ºÞ¨º¨à¦³«Ü¦h½ì¨ý¨à¡A¬O¦³¦Û«Hªººt«µ¡C
There was a great
deal to enjoy here in some very communicative playing. Phrasing
was elegant and you always paid attention to detail ¡V though you can sometimes taper off the
last note in phrase such as , so that the last note is not accented.
Almost all the passage work was completely tidy ¡V but with some blemishes towards the end.
³o¼Ö¦±¦b¤@¨Ç·¾³q©Êªººt«µ¦³«Ü¦h¼Ö½ì¡C¤À¥y¬OÀu¶®ªº¡A¦Ó¥B±z¸g±`¯d·N²Ó¸`
¡V ¾¨ºÞ±z¦³®É¥i¥H§â¼Ö¥yªº³Ì¤@Óµ³vº¥ÅÜ®z¦p¡A¦]¦¹³Ì«á¤@Óµ«D±j©ç¡C´X¥G¥þ³¡ªº¼Ö¥y§@·~³£¬O¾ã¼äªº
¡V ¦ý¦b³Ì«á¦³¤@¨Ç·å²«¡C
This was an
imaginative approach to this Character Pieces, with all its tempo
changes and mood swings. This had a very pleasing sense of
performance. Well done.
¦¹¤H®æ´y¼g¼Ö¦±¤D¤Û·Qªº§@«~¡A¦³¨ä³t«×ÂàÅܤΤ߱¡Â\°Ê¡C¦¹ºt«µ¦³¥O¤H´r§Öªº·Pı¡C¨}¨Î¡C
Lovely fingerwork
here and some most effective staccato. These were very well known
and almost blemish-free. They had a good sense of musical shape.
³o¨à¦³¬ü¦nªº¤â«ü¹B§@¡AÁÙ¦³¤@¨Ç«Ü¦³¹ê¤OªºÂ_«µ¡C¦³«Ü¦nªº»{ª¾¡A¥B´X¥GµL·å²«¡C¥¦Ì¦bµ¼Ö§ÎºA¤W¦³¨}¦nªºµ¼Ö·Pı¡C
Some sharps were
missed, but it mostly kept going, despite some uncertainties
along the way.
¤@¨Ç¤É¸¹º|¼u¤F¡A¦ý¤´µM«O«ùÄ~Äò¡A¤£ºÞ¨º¨Ç¤£ªÖ©wªº³¡¥÷¡A¶¶þÓ«e¥h¡C
A lively response
to all tests. Most promising ¡V particularly the last
test.
©Ò¦³´úÅç³£¦³¬¡¼âªº¦^À³¡C¤j¦³¥i¬° ¡V
¯S§O¬O³Ì«áªº´úÅç¡C
Some most
enjoyable playing. You communicate very well with you audience.
Congratulations.
¤@¨Ç¦³½ì¨ý©Êªº¼u«µ¡C±z»PÆ[²³ªº·¾³q«D±`¦n¡C®¥³ß¡C
ATCL in Performance (Solo Piano) 25 NOV 2004
75-100 marks = Pass with
Distinction
50-75 marks = Pass
0-49 marks = Below Pass
Bach: Predlude & Fugue in d minor
WTC BKI
A lively and lucid performance of the prelude ~ maintaining a
buoyant rhythmic flow, and concluding with a sonorous cadence.
The fugue had some unevenness of tone which made it feel slightly
jerky in manner. However, this was dignified playing - lossing
accuracy just momentarily.
Haydn: Sonata in e minor, Hob XVI:34
Haydn with firm, bright tone - but never exaggorated or
over-powering. There was a goold deal of nervous energy, and also
some warm-hearted moments - especially appropriate to the second
subject. The Adagio was expressively shaped. A relaxed, cantabile
sound, followed by a tuneful Rondo - unhurried in its liveliness
and accurate in detail.
Britten: Moderato & Nocturne
Despite small blemishes in arpeggio work (bar 17, 19), this
was a bright and cleanly articulated performance, contrasted in
mood from bar 42 and building a sonorous climax at bar 70. The
Nocturne had a gentle flow and simplicity of expression.
Carefully shaded playing.
Fluency and accuracy were generally well-developed.
"Cautious" reading ~ partially correct, but using a very limited dynamic range.
A relaxed, but 'professional' stage manner. The programme was varied, and supported by succinct, informative notes. The music was correctly timed.
A very perceptive ear in most tests.
¡@