Question Thirty Seven: Personally, I
think you are playing games here. Jesus to me is adding something to the law that was
not stated by Moses or God. Jesus is being a little more charitable than Moses / God and
in fact adding a new condition and state for a marriages disolvemant (i.e. Divorce).
In other words, the only reason Jesus permits divorce is for adultery and the
reason He permits it is because we are to be merciful to people and not stone them
anymore. . In regards to what Paul says in 1 Cor 7:11,12 I balance that off with
what Jesus said in Matthew 19:9 and come up with the new
covenant / Christian doctrine that Christians should not divorce their spouse except for
adultery, So...
Answer: You sound like a
model Christian and a great disciple of the Lord. I’m
sure Jesus is proud to know you and can’t wait to tell you that in person when He sees
you.
Listen - “disciple” - , you are dealing with many many separate but
related subjects :
Justice/ Law/ Old Covenant vs. Mercy/Grace/ New Covenant. YOU ARE ALSO
DEALING WITH STATEMENTS MADE TO PEOPLE WITH TWO VERY DIFFERENT
TYPES OF NATURE (i.e. people with an old nature and people with a new nature)
No matter how you thread that thread you can’t hop back and forth between the
significance of those facts and covenants the way you do.
In light of some new information this question is being rewritten and
should be finished sometime in August (it is very involved). If anything I will
come down harder on divorce
than I did previously and may have to rewrite sections of this site.
”What therefore God has joined
together let
no man separate” Matthew 19:6
_____________
Here is a preview of what is to
come...
‘But no one puts a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment; for the patch pulls away
from the garment, and a worse tear results. Nor do men put new wine into old
wineskins; otherwise the wineskins burst, and the wine pours out, and the wineskins are
ruined; but they put new wine into fresh wineskins, and both are preserved.’ Matthew
9:16,17
See , what this means is New Wine (New Covenant Teachings) in old wine skins (Man’ s
Nature under Old Covenant) will not work. Man will break under the load. (See
Matthew 19:10 His disciples could only bear the writ of divorce, forget
about staying married in anything beyond that (i.e. adultery). They had a
real problem in dealing with the merciful standards of the Old Covenant. Forget about
any HIGHER standard)
Again, the old cannot be combined with the new. But since Jesus has died we are a New
Creation (New Wine Skins) Therefore we can hold the New Covenant teachings of
forgiveness and restoration. If we can’t, either we are not saved (i.e. not
have New Nature) or have not yet learned how to die to self. That’s pretty much it.
And by the way this is the correct teaching on
the new wine.
Not the fluff that was going on recently in a lot of churches. (What a bunch of
watered down hogwash. Trash really, true true trash.)
___________
For more on the New Wine
Including a section on how to
preach it, and teach it to your congregation
Click Here
____________
Another preview of what is to
come...
In regards to the verse in Matthew 19 that you bring up, let’s look at it as well as it’s
parallel verse in Matthew 5.
“but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the cause of
unchastity(por-ni-ah)
, makes her commit adultery(moy-khah-o)
; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery (moy-khah-o) ” Matthew
5:32
“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality(por-ni-ah)
, and marries another woman commits adultery(moy-khah-o)
.” Matthew 19:9
Notice that Jesus DOES NOT SAY that adultery (moy-khah-o) is grounds for a person to
divorce but fornication (por-ni-ah). These are two separate words from two separate
word groups and should be kept that way. If Jesus was granting people permission to
divorce on the basis of Adultery - as you say - He
would have used that word, and since HE DID NOT he must be talking about something
else all together.
Fornication is not adultery, they are committed under entirely different circumstances.
If a married person committed fornication at best - according to the Greek - you would
be talking about incest (por-ni-ah) (CLICK HERE) or maybe a spouses sudden discovery
of the other spouses hidden pre marital life as a fornicator (por-ni-ah) (CLICK HERE)
but these are the things - at best - you can argue for. IT DOES NOT
MEAN THAT A PERSON CAN GET A DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF
ADULTERY, Maybe I should say that again in case you missed it,
IT DOES NOT SAY - ACCORDING TO THE GREEK - THAT A
PERSON CAN GET A DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF ADULTERY.
If fact Jesus would address THAT situation later when He is confronted with a
person caught in the very act of adultery (i.e. He forgives them, John 8). If Jesus could
forgive someone caught in adultery, so should we.
Again, the question of “what to do in the case of adultery?” is NOT the question at all in
Matthew 5 and 19, so your question (#37 ) is a faulty question already. Again, the
question in Matthew chapters 5 & 19 is “What to do in the case of fornication?” And even there, it’s not really what to do, it’s more like you can do it if you
choose, but according to John 8 it may not be the best thing.
If Jesus meant divorce on the basis of Adultery He would have said as much. You should
really ask yourself why Jesus used two different words in those verses to describe two
very different sins, before you jump to conclusions. Jesus is concerned about the issue of
fornication here. He will deal with the issue of adultery later.
For a further discussion of the word fornication (por-ni-ah)
(Click Here)
And PS I really don’t agree with the “incest (por-ni-ah) or prostitute (por-ni-ah) angle”,
even though both are terrible terrible sins Jesus does talk
about prostitutes (or "professional" fornicators according to the Greek)
entering heaven before the religious people of His day. Therefore, it was a sin that could
be
forgiven (and if Jesus could forgive it (por-ni-ah) - as well as
adultery - how could we not forgive it?). The sin of incest is
a terrible sin too. I really cant’ think of a worse sin, but from what I have heard over the
years even that terrible sin can be forgive (see proof-text in 1 Cor
5:5), What Jesus is talking about in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 is the state
of a relationship between the actually signing of a marriage covenant - under the Law -
and the actually consummation (or God “Joining Together”) the parties in the covenant.
In other words the (Jewish?) pre marital - covenant IS A LEGITIMATE COVENANT
AND MUST BE KEPT BY MAN, but because it has not been consummated (JOINED
TOGETHER verse), it could be broken, on the grounds of fornication, but only on those
ground could it be broken. (It has to do with the nature of the type of the two fold
covenant that it is [Click Here] for a further discussion).
Once the covenant was consummated (i.e. the second part of it completed) that would be
it. It was a done deal. What God has JOINED together (i.e. intercourse) let no man take
apart comes into play. For Jesus pre marital covenants can be broken for they are
covenants that are not in force until they are consummated (i.e. joined together). IOW’s
since God didn’t put them together yet they - the two parties - can be legally separated.
[And for those of you that say that fornication - in pre marriage - is OK for divorce, but
adultery - in post marriage - isn’t, what you are really doing is breaking the spirit of
John 8 (forgiving bad sins in a relationship), Again - since Jesus uses the word
fornication (porniah) AND WIFE in the same verse
theses verses MUST be talking about Post engagement/ pre
marriage situations. They (i.e. the Jewish people he was addressing) knew what He was
talking about.]
For a discussion of the Jewish use of the word “wife”
Also remember, Jesus had a forgiving heart, if you find yourself involved in the above
post engagement / pre marital situation (and I’m not really sure how this applies to our
culture, but scripture is quite clear in Romans that God treats Jews and Gentiles alike),
If you find yourself in the above situation remember. Jesus is not saying that you should
“divorce” the “spouse” you are engaged too (If they commit fornication during the
engagement period), He is only saying that if you do end the engagement COVENANT on
the basis of fornication that you will not be guilty of breaking the “marriage” covenant,
for it’s not really a consummated covenant (See the parallel lesson of a Nun or Priest
who “opt outs” before they take their FINAL vows). WHAT JESUS WAS DOING IN
MATTHEW 5 AND 19 WAS CLARIFYING WHAT A MARRIAGE COVENANT WAS ( I.E.
A TWO PART COVENANT). For Jesus you can forgive fornication (Pre marital / post
engagement sex) as well as adultery (post marital sex), but with adultery you are “stuck”
in the covenant, with fornication there is an out. The Old Covenant Law was not
concerned about divorce on account of FORNICATION for death was prescribed that
(so you need to rephrase your question 37),
Again what Jesus is talking about is fornication (por-ni-ah) NOT adultery (moy-khah-o)
otherwise He would have used that word.
Again...
for a further discussion of the word
Por-ni-ah
Click Here
For other verses that uses the word Por-ni-ah, as well as other verses that uses the word Moy-khah-o (Adultery)
For the case for por-ni-ah meaning the state of the
Jewish engagement period
Click Here
For Footnotes
Click Here
Still another preview of what is to
come...
Also, since you bring the verses in 1 Corinthians into this discussion, let me ask you... did
you ever really read them?
1 Corinthians 7 is talking about 4 different types of people.
1) The never married ( 1 Cor 7:25)
2) Christian’s married to an unbeliever who leaves ( 1 Cor 7:15)
3) Christians married to an unbeliever who stays ( 1 Cor 7: 12,13)
4)AND... CHRISTIANS MARRIED TO EACH OTHER!!! ( 1 Cor 7: 10,11)
Now ask yourself something... do Christians, real Christians ever ever divorce each
other? If your answer is “yes” then I can guarantee you that your definition of “Christian”
is really really wrong. Jesus said that what your would do unto the least of my brethren
you do unto me. Would a Christian divorce Jesus? Of course not, the why do you argue -
especially in light of the above verse - that Christians can divorce each other? Jesus does
not give permission in 1 Cor 7:10, 11 for divorce and remarriage of Christians. At most He
allows for separation, but the spouses MUST REMAIN UNMARRIED. Your wrong to
bring in 1 Corinthians the way you do.
PS. read the chapter in reverse order ot get the full effect of verse 10 and 11. Also
remember to pay CLOSE ATTENTION to what Paul is ALSO saying in verse 10....
”But to the married I give instructions, not I, BUT
THE LORD (JESUS)”
IOW’s the same person with whom you pin your hopes on for your divorce in Matthew 5
& 19 is also saying to you in 1 Corinthians NOT to divorce your Christian spouse.
This is an open source web-site. In
other words you can freely copy its pages and put them any server you wish. [If
you’re not sure what I’m talking about... just right click your mouse (if you have
Microsoft Windows) and
click on “View Source” and you will see the HTML code that underlies the particular
page you are viewing. If you ‘cut and paste’ what you see into a word processor you will
then be able to ‘save it’ and then ‘cut and paste’ (or upload) that particular page on any
server which
supports HTML (just about all of them). The pictures themselves can also be
copied by right clicking your mouse and using the “Save Picture As...” feature].
Thus you can have your own web site [Angelfire
(Lycos ) offers free web pages as well as many
other sites Click here
and ask around].
Periodically I will update the links on these pages. Below you will find the dates of the
‘last update’ of a particular page. If you wish you can use the below “updates” as a guide
to update your own pages or you can update your own at you own discretion.
Feel free to improve on any of the pages you copy.
Also, feel free to use this entire sites content (Music, Theology,
Divorce and Remarriage etc.) in any way you wish (for example: if you wish to publish a
page in whole or in part in another medium (let’s say in tract or book
form), you have my permission to do so (and you don’t have to inform me or put my
name on the work).
You can also sell the work at a profit if you wish, just having these works circulating in
the world is reward enough for me).
Again, this is an open source web site. The code (as well as content) is
free to all. Feel free to tinker, dabble and fiddle around with both code and
content. God is a very creative Spirit. Who knows what kind of page(s) you will develop.
Also, who knows what kind of influential tracts or books you may write. (If you want
you can change the sentence structures around and put this sites content in your own
words. Then put your name on the book or tract and shop it around to some
publishers. Most of this sites content is desperately in need of rewrite so putting your
name on a rewritten work is probably a good idea, actually a
very good idea).
May God bless you in your efforts.
P.S. If you copy these pages to a server make sure you place your
own e-mail address on the pages so people will know whom to write if they have any
questions (you can also leave my e-mail address on them if you wish (i.e.
StevenMRyan@cs.com), but as of now I don’t have the time to answer everyone’s
questions so I think your e-mail address would be a better idea).