Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

TONY MCCARROLL - SUES OASIS


Tony McCarroll, ex-drummer for the band, hired the lawyer of ex-Beatle drummer Pete Best in a suit against his former bandmates for 20 percent of the band's earnings.  However, Jens Hills, McCarroll's attorney, told ATN that the similarities between his two clients stop at their coincidental roles as drummers.

Part of the reason Tony was anxious to set the record straight was that he had got a little weary of the comparisons that were being made between him and Pete Best, Hills said. Best, who was booted by the Beatles in 1962, was represented by Hills in negotiations with the Fab Four when they sought to use tracks with their former bandmate on the Beatles' Anthology series. Pete was removed from the Beatles before they ever became successful, while Tony was removed from Oasis just at the point when the band wagon was starting to roll, Hills said.

McCarroll was ousted from Oasis based on personality differences in April 1995. The week after 'Some Might Say' went
to number one in the U.K., Hills notes. The ex-drummer (who was replaced by Alan White) claims that he was unlawfully dismissed from a partnership that was to run the duration of the recording contract--that is, through at least five albums, according to Hills. He's seeking a declaration that his expulsion from the partnership was unlawful, and he's seeking damages," or 20 percent of the band's profits following his removal. McCarroll already receives royalties for the band's first album, Definitely Maybe. According to the liner notes of (What's the Story) Morning Glory, McCarroll appeared on just one track, Some Might Say.

If he was successful with his suit, the ex-drummer would have also received profits from the 1995's widely successful
(What's the Story) Morning Glory as well as from the much anticipated Be Here Now, due out in August, which he did not appear on. London's Sunday Times reports that McCarroll's total take could have reached 18 million pounds. Vanessa Cotton, an Oasis spokeswoman at Ignition management, acknowledged the ongoing suit against the band, but would not comment on the matter. " It's an ongoing thing, so there won't be [any statements] at this time", Cotton said. A representative from the office of John Stathan, the band's lawyer, told ATN, "We don't talk to press. McCarroll originally filed suit in December 1995. He was inaccurately reported to have settled out of court in a story printed last year by the British tabloid News of the World. Although the story was corrected three weeks later at the behest of Oasis, most fans lingered under the assumption that the dispute was resolved until a story about McCarroll's litigation ran in the Sunday Times.

Oasis agreed on an out of court settlement with their former drummer after his lawyers approached the group's lawyer's with an offer minutes before the trial was due to start.  Under the settlement agreement the group have agreed to buy out Tony's share of future royalties on the Oasis recordings on which he played for £550,000.

The group are extremely pleased with the settlement. Their position has always been that Tony should receive fair payment for the recordings made while he was in the group, but no more.  Each side will pay for their own legal costs for the four year action.