Slam
Bang:
Deep Impact
Armageddon |
DIRECTOR
Mimi Leder
SCREENWRITERS
Bruce
Joel Rubin
Michael Tolkin
PRODUCERS
David Brown
Richard D. Zanuck
CINEMATOGRAPHER
Dietrich Lohmann
MUSIC
James Horner
EDITORS
Paul Cichocki
David Rosenbloom
CAST
Robert Duvall (Captain Tanner)
Téa Leoni (Jenny Lerner)
Elijah Wood (Leo Biederman)
Vanessa Redgrave (Robin Lerner)
Morgan Freeman (President Tom Beck)
Maximilian Schell (Jason Lerner)
James Cromwell (Alan Rittenhouse)
Ron Eldard (Dr. Oren Monash)
Jon Favreau (Dr. Gus Partenza)
Laura Innes (Beth Stanley)
Mary McCormack (Andrea Baker)
Leelee Sobieski (Sarah)
Blair Underwood (Mark Simon)
Dougray Scott (Eric Vennekor)
MPAA rating: PG-13
Running
time: 120m
U.S. release: May 8, 1998
Video availability: VHS -DVD
Other Mimi
Leder films
reviewed on this website:
- Pay
It Forward
|
[May 1998]
Last year brought two duelling disaster films on the same subject
-- Dante's
Peak and Volcano.
This year, the apocalypse flicks (or, as I call them, "apocaflicks")
competing for your seven bucks are Armageddon, due July
1, and the misleadingly titled Deep Impact. Both deal
with a big, inconsiderate comet threatening the planet, and if
Deep Impact is any indication, you might want to hold
out for Armageddon.
I don't know whether to be annoyed or amused by filmmakers who
don't know one of the fundamental laws of moviegoing: We go to
different movies for different things, and we adjust our expectations
(and sometimes our IQs) accordingly. Someone attending The
Lost World expecting a sobering analysis of human nature
will be frustrated, as will someone who goes to The
Sweet Hereafter expecting a couple of raptors to menace
the kids in the schoolbus. Rare indeed is the artist/entertainer
who can juggle convincing emotion and convincing CGI effects.
Deep Impact juggles so relentlessly that it seems positively
schizo, giving us a little "character development"
here and a little mini-disaster there, leading up to the big
event -- death from above, the tidal waves and mass destruction,
the skyscrapers scattering like petals. And good God,
does this ever not work. You can feel the audience's impatience
during the obligatory tedious dialogue scenes, the disappointment
when the movie finally gets around to those big destruction scenes,
which can't possibly live up to all the build-up and anticipation.
The new apocaflicks have the good fortune of boasting uniformly
good casts, as opposed to the old ones back in the '70s, which
mostly had one or two good actors (Gene Hackman or Paul Newman)
and a lot of has-beens or TV stars. Here, Téa Leoni is
nicely low-key as a reporter who pursues a government cover-up
and trips over the biggest story in history: A comet the size
of Mount Rushmore has made definite plans to visit us real soon.
Morgan Freeman plays the President, whose sad job it is to break
this epic bad news to his country, and Freeman has such strong,
quiet authority that the noisy opening-night audience shut up
whenever he spoke.
President Freeman sends up a crew of brave astronauts, headed
by Robert Duvall, to land on the comet and plant nuclear explosives
to blow it up into several million Earth-friendly pieces. This
doesn't work; pretty much everything else they try doesn't work,
either. It's during the walking-on-the-comet sequence that director
Mimi Leder (The Peacemaker) has her finest moment: Due
to a burst of "explosive outgassing" (sounds like Cartman
after too many Cheesy Poofs), an astronaut is literally blown
sky-high, and we get a view of the rapidly receding ground from
his panicked point of view. It's a chilling, vertiginous moment.
Leder, working with a script credited to Michael Tolkin and Bruce
Joel Rubin, can't do much with the alleged "human interest"
scenes. Téa frets over the divorce of her parents (Vanessa
Redgrave and Maximillian Schell), young astronomer Elijah Wood
frets over his school sweetheart, Duvall frets over his crew,
Freeman's performance is one long fret-fest. A serious movie
could be made about characters taking stock of their lives in
the face of apocalypse, but this isn't it. The characterization
is TV-quality at best; everyone makes self-defining speeches
to each other. A movie like Deep Impact may make you appreciate
the no-nonsense sweat of Volcano or Twister,
for me the two best recent apocaflicks because they didn't bother
at all with plot -- the characters hurtled along, working
as a team, racing against the clock, certainly never stopping
to muse on the importance of family or paths not taken. Disaster
movies are trim and exciting or they're nothing, and Deep
Impact isn't trim or exciting.
[July
1998]
There is very little to say about Armageddon:
Criticism of this huge, aggressive corporate product seems quaint
and impotent. Some will prefer it to the year's other big-bang
movie Deep Impact -- prefer its beer-commercial rocketry
to Deep Impact's "seriousness." And some will
be jazzed by its jackhammer retro-ness, its unapologetic macho
shallowness. This, they will say (as they always seem
to say), is popcorn entertainment. Memory can be kind: I remember
nothing much about Armageddon except Bruce Willis trashing
his acting credibility, and Ben Affleck and Liv Tyler in an idiotic
love scene involving animal crackers, and Michael Bay directing
it all as if supervising a group of first-graders bashing toy
trucks together.
|