the brothers grimm

review by rob gonsalves

director 
Terry Gilliam

screenwriter
Ehren Kruger

producer
Daniel Bobker
Charles Roven

cinematographer
Newton Thomas Sigel

music
Dario Marianelli

editor
Lesley Walker


cast

Matt Damon (Wilhelm Grimm)
Heath Ledger
(Jacob Grimm)
Peter Stormare
(Cavaldi)
Jonathan Pryce
(Delatombe)
Lena Headey
(Angelika)
Monica Bellucci
(Mirror Queen)


mpaa rating: PG-13
running time: 118m
u.s. release: 8/26/05
video availability: TBA
official website


other terry gilliam films
reviewed on this website:

- fear and loathing in las vegas
- the fisher king
- 12 monkeys


You'd think a movie called The Brothers Grimm directed by Terry Gilliam, one of the leading fantasists in world cinema, would be an occasion for true sorcery. But I can see no evidence, other than a few glittering spots of bent visual imagination, that Gilliam was even on the set. The movie feels thoroughly like a project Gilliam did halfheartedly, just to stay in the game. The result plays like what might have happened if Stanley Kubrick had directed an episode of Battlestar Galactica -- some interesting moments no other director could've pulled off, but why the hell is he even bothering?

I'm beginning to think that old-school, quill-pen-and-candlelight fantasy and Terry Gilliam are too neat a fit, anyway. This director thrives on conflict; he has often yearned for the old Monty Python days, when they had no budget for real horses and had to make do with knights hopping around and clacking coconut shells together. Such a sloppy, scattershot genius as Gilliam needs something to push against, some barrier to force him towards a creative workaround, if he is not to disappear up his own nethers. Two of his best recent films, 12 Monkeys and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, had nary a whisper of fairy tales, giants, period costumes, etc. Maybe Gilliam, like David Lynch, needs stories that aren't ideally suited to his past strengths, so that he doesn't fall into easy self-repetition. Gilliam does nothing in The Brothers Grimm that he hasn't done before, and far better, in such films as Time Bandits and even Jabberwocky.

The premise, cooked up by screenwriter Ehren Kruger (continuing his long run of mediocrity after a promising start with 1999's Arlington Rd.), has the famous storytelling brothers Wilhelm and Jacob Grimm (Matt Damon and Heath Ledger) as con artists who bilk superstitious villagers by fabricating supernatural menaces and then swooping in to save the day. Naturally, the Grimms are put to the test when a real paranormal threat rears its head: various children, including Little Red Riding Hood and Hansel and Gretel, have gone missing, and the Frenchmen who occupy Germany want the Grimms to get to the bottom of the mystery. This has promise, but the movie quickly degenerates into scenes of Matt Damon and Heath Ledger (the latter of whom is gradually shaking off some of his earlier stiff mannerisms) rushing around cluttered sets. As a fantasy, Grimm coheres even less well than Gilliam's The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, which I thought was a righteous mess until I saw this one.

Is it a comedy? A dark fantasy? Gilliam never pinpoints it, and I'm not sure he wants to. I think he wants it to be a scruffy, disorganized tall tale, debunking the great brothers as a couple of fakers and wankers. But then they're also supposed to rise to the occasion and become heroes -- Gilliam tries to have it both ways, and it doesn't work here. A Terry Gilliam movie about the real Brothers Grimm, with no lame formula thrills imposed onto the biographical material, might've been something to see and cherish. Instead we get a hodgepodge only slightly more intelligent than Van Helsing, and you have no idea how it pains me to say that.

A couple of bits -- a horse that unfurls a spider web from its mouth, a girl who rubs her face off -- are fantastical and disturbing in the classic Gilliam manner. Probably moments like that were what made Gilliam want to come to the set every morning. But the rest of it is just so much wasted, frantic energy. Jonathan Pryce turns up as a snitty French higher-up, looking visibly bored; the luscious Monica Bellucci, in spectacular costumes we never get a good look at, barely makes an impression as the evil Mirror Queen before she turns into a computer effect. The Grimms themselves seem lost in their own movie; they're 19th-century Ghostbusters without the wit. I'm not often shocked any more by the badness of any given movie -- movies, by and large, suck nowadays. But this is Terry Gilliam, man, the director of whom I could never have said that his work, even when flawed and sloppy, left me bored and irritated. Until now.




home - q&a - miscellany - cool links - rare video resources
cult movies archive - tirades - contact