For social or
political topics:
A) Demonstrate
that a Problem Actually Exists (offense, pt 1).
Goal: So you’ve got
a new idea—so what? What harm is there
in the way things are done now? What’s
wrong with just keeping things the way they are? If it’s not broken, we don’t want to fix
it. Demonstrate that the problem is
real.
Possible Strategies:
Give anecdotes and statistics about
individuals harmed. Show that the way
things are done now harms many people, or if it only harms a few people, it
harms them deeply.
B) Demonstrate
the Cause of the Problem (offense, pt 2).
Goal: Show that the problems are tied to
the way things are now.
Possible Strategies:
Provide evidence that shows that the harm
described in part A is caused by the particular law, method, or
attitude which the paper is arguing against.
Provide evidence
that shows that although the plan presently used is reducing the problem, there
remains a gap between results and the desired goal.
C) Propose the
new solution or plan and offer support (defense).
Goal:
Introduce the new plan and offer support. Remember—the solution the paper proposes must
address the problems that the paper presented in Part A!
Possible Strategies:
Provide evidence that the new plan has
been tried in other countries, states, or cities and that it has shown positive
results in treating the problem described in Part A.
Show that the problem described in Part A
has been treated successfully in a model school, experimental hospital,
etc. Hypothesize that the experimental
plan may work on a larger scale.
Show how a different but similar problem
is successfully treated; propose that this treatment could be modified to
address the problem described in Part A.
Show that the new plan better fits with currently accepted theories or with investigator’s observations and therefore should better treat the problem described in Part A.
For scientific
or paranormal topics
A) Demonstrate
Weakness in the Current Theory (offense).
Goal:
So you’ve got a new idea—so what? What’s wrong with the old idea? If it’s not
broken, we don’t want to fix it.
Demonstrate that the current theory is broken.
Strategy 1) Challenge the traditional
evidence.
Show that previous investigators used
faulty evidence.
Show that previous investigators
intentionally falsified evidence.
Show that traditionally used evidence can’t
be applied to this case.
Strategy 2) Challenge traditional
scientists’ interpretation of the evidence; challenge the link between the
evidence and their claims about the evidence.
Show that previous investigators had
preconceived ideas that warped their interpretation of the data.
Show that traditional arguments are
outdated.
Show that traditional arguments don’t
really
apply
to this case.
B) Present the
New Theory and its Evidence (defense).
Goal:
Introduce the new theory and offer support.
Strategies:
Show how the current theory fails to
explain the actual observations in the field or the laboratory.
Present evidence from new areas that shows
that traditionally accepted evidence may be an anomaly.
Show that new evidence cannot be explained
using the traditional theory.
Show how certain evidence fits the new
theory better than the old theory.