LOS RETROCESOS DE LA FÍSICA
El progreso de todos nuestros conocimiento se ha debido a t las observaciones y a su correcta interpretación. En la antigüedad se consideraba que la Tierra era el centro del Universo y era plana. Se puede decir que el nacimiento de la verdadera física se originó con Galileo y Newton; porque ellos se concretaron a explicar la acción de los fenómenos físicos, exclusivamente de acuerdo con la observación de estos, sin pretender explicar su origen. Como la luz se mueve en el espacio sideral, tenía que ser de naturaleza corpuscular. De acuerdo con los conocimientos y requerimientos en sus épocas se pudo suponer que el espacio interestelar estaba afectado por la masa de los cuerpos celestes, formando lo que se consideró como un campo de fuerza que actuaba sobre dichos cuerpos de acuerdo con las observaciones de la acción de la gravedad, tanto en los cuerpos terrestres como astronómicos. De acuerdo con todo esto se evitaron cometer contradicciones.
INTRODUCCIÓN
Este año (2008) ya entramos al tercero en que oficialmente el presidente corrupto del premio Nobel de física Sune Swanberg, les otorgó a los ladrones Roy J.Gluber, catedrático de Harvard, John
L. Hall, de Colorado y Theodor W.Hensch de Munich en el 2005 dicho premio, con lo cual se inició oficialmente la época antigalileica de la física en pleno siglo XXI. Este se produjo porque en el siglo XX, entre los investigadores científicos mas reconocidos, no hubo ninguno capacitado o suficientemente interesado en descubrir la realidad de los problemas de la física del siglo XX, que tuvo un gran progreso por la abundancia de fenómenos existentes en la naturaleza. Al evidenciarse y darse cuenta de que entre las leyes y fórmulas existentes y las observaciones posteriores había variaciones diferenciales, se trató de modificar las interpretaciones existentes; lo cual le correspondió a Einstein cuando era joven; el trató de resolver este problema de una manera que nadie de prestigio reconocido en el siglo XX (y aun en a actualidad), lo pudo hacer. Para explicar todo esto, entre muchas razones, hay que ser muy impopular en este terreno científico, aunque con una visión mas real de esto; como fueron Galileo y Newton en su época, y de acuerdo con los conocimientos existentes en aquel entonces, o los de mi padre, que en 1945 demostró que las teorías de la relatividad estaban equivocadas. Aquí no voy a hablar de ninguna teoría física en particular; voy a hablar de cuales deben de ser las causas y efectos para poder interpretar correctamente a dichas teorías; esto lo haré de la manera mas concisa posible.
Desde el siglo XIX ya se había aceptado que todos los cuerpos y partículas están formados por átomos, y con esto tendremos que considerar que todos los fenómenos son causados por los átomos y son manifestados en las partículas y cuerpos macroscópicos por sus efectos, perceptibles por nuestros sentidos. Para muchos se ha considerado a Einstein como un gran genio, inclusive superior a Galileo
o Newton. Pero si el nunca supo distinguir entre las causas y os efectos de los fenómenos, yo únicamente lo llamaría un preten-genio. Si por ejemplo en magnitudes astronómicas quiso ajustar las teorías con las nuevas observaciones, suponiendo que el Universo era curvo, con esto logró de una manera subjetiva hacer que sus teorías coincidieran con las observaciones. Por ejemplo, al considerar dos cuerpos celestes en movimiento, en un Universo curvo, pero separados en línea recta cierta distancia, pero afectados en su interacción por la longitud de una línea curva (línea geodésica) dada por la curvatura del Universo, que desde luego es mayor en longitud y en interacciones (que la recta), y forzándola a iguales interacciones que las observadas. Este es el caso del planeta Mercurio moviéndose alrededor del Sol. Si los cuerpos están fijos uno con respecto del otro, no se produce dicha interacción... En 1945 mi padre comprobó que al moverse los cuerpos dichos, los valores de las radiaciones gravitatorias variaban de acuerdo con sus respectivas emisiones y recepciones, y de acuerdo con los valores obtenidos por las observaciones.
Con las teorías ondulatorias de las radiaciones, también están confundiendo las causas con los efectos. El hecho de que la materia se transforme en energía, y viceversa, y de la fórmula: E = m c2, son un fiasco. Por la anterior razón mi padre siempre fue partidario de las teorías corpusculares de las radiaciones, y yo lo he comprobado, estableciendo la dinámica de los corpúsculos y micro corpúsculos y eliminando las teorías ondulatorias de las radiaciones. Como la realidad no se puede comprender con lo subjetivo, como pretenden los partidarios de la física moderna, considero a Einstein no como un genio, sino como un preten-genio . No me corresponde juzgar el trabajo de investigación de mi padre y mío; como me ha dicho en varias ocasiones Don Gonzalo Estrada Cruz: Dios dispuso que mi padre y yo hayamos completado la física, por alguna razón que estamos muy lejos de comprenderla, los que actuamos honradamente, y menos los piratas; pero sí comprendo, por ejemplo, que en mas de 40 años que me he dedicado a la investigación he descubierto muchas cosas buenas, que por el gran egoísmo se ha pretendido ignorarlas en perjuicio de la humanidad. Galileo y Newton concibieron la dinámica clásica; mi padre Estanislao de Hoyos y yo concebimos la dinámica de los corpúsculos y microcorpúsculos, y no porque yo sea un ciudadano distinguido de los Estados Unidos, o de algún país de Europa. Como buen presidente de México, quisiera que Felipe Calderón fuera el primero en darme el reconocimiento oficial. Mi trabajo de investigación es un obsequio a la ciencia y a la humanidad; no puedo exiguir a nadie; puedo pedir al que reconozca; puedo insinuar al que me apoye.. En mas de 40 años he hecho mi investigación. ¿Cuánto tiempo (y esfuerzo) se necesita para que se me de un reconocimiento oficial?
Monterrey, México, 24 de enero del 2008 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
SOME VALUES GIVEN IN THIS WORK
Gravity microcorpuscle: m
g = 7.811 x 10—58 Kg.
EXPERIENCIAS NEGATIVAS.
Las ideas absurdas establecidas desde Ptolomeo predominaron hasta que Galileo consideró que los verdaderos conocimientos se deben de obtener por razonamientos lógicos. Estas ideas se fueron imponiendo hasta la época de Newton, en que los razonamientos lógicos coincidían con las observaciones. Después de Newton se siguió respetando la anterior idea, pero a medias, al no poderse interpretar de una manera mas correcta las observaciones; por ejemplo, esto sucedió con una teoría ondulatoria de la luz, considerando la existencia del éter. Junto con estas interpretaciones deficientes se estableció un espíritu muy impositivo, que le daba absoluto respeto a las personas que impusieron dichas interpretaciones erróneas, con lo cual se prestaba para faltarle el respeto a las interpretaciones mas lógicas. Por esto, aquí voy a hablar muy claro de muchas cosas y de muchas tonterías.
Todo un catedrático universitario en una ocasión me dijo que yo estaba perdiendo mi tiempo como investigador, pues con la física moderna se podía explicar cualquier problema o fenómeno perfectamente. Otro profesionista me dijo con ironía que todos los físicos del mundo estaban equivocados menos yo; yo no estoy luchando contra millones de ideas que tienen millones de físicos; sin contra una sola idea errónea que tienen millones de físicos. Otro profesionista me dijo que mis modelos de átomos explicaban de una manera muy sencilla el comportamiento de la materia, lo cual era erróneo, porque la física es mucho mas complicada. Otro profesionista me dijo que debería ser mas amable en mis explicaciones; con todo respeto, a mi no me interesa que se me acepten por simpatía mis ideas, sino por lógicas. Otra persona me dijo que había estudiado muchos años para entender algo muy útil, como es la física moderna, y que no podía aceptar algo que no estuviera de acuerdo con ella.
Otros me han dicho que soy un pobre iluso que me quiero comparar con cualquier físico reconocido; pero esta es una idea sentimentalista, sin ningún fundamento material y lógico y muy opuesto a mis investigaciones.. También se me ha juzgado como un charlatán; pero si consideramos esto, yo podría decir lo mismo de Einstein y sus teorías tan subjetivas, y aquí con alguna razón, porque el recibió toda clase de reconocimientos y premios; y mi padre y yo con nuestras ideas completamente lógicas, por ejemplo, lo único que yo he recibido han sido bombas con virus para que no pueda usar el internet; y si no me han podido demandar por difamación por lo que he dicho, es que yo tengo toda la razón. Muchos piensan que si no se han reconocido los trabajos de mi padre y míos es porque no sirven; pero no piensan que es por intereses egoístas y personales de muchos influyentes.
En todos los terrenos he padecido cosas absurdas y tendenciosas; por ejemplo que los patrones y los trabajadores son enemigos; al contrario, como amigos, uno necesitan de los otros, es un espíritu de cooperación, no una competencia egoísta; los hipócritas y egoístas no entienden lo que es amistad Muchas veces pensé que con una buena preparación y responsabilidad se podía progresar en un trabajo; pero muchas veces sucede lo contrario, porque esto estimula a los egoístas para difamar al que actúa al contrario de ellos. Una prueba de lo mezquinas e incompetentes que son estos egoístas es que nadie de ellos se a atrevido a decirme que no debía de haberles dicho ladrones a catedráticos de universidades de mucho prestigio, como las de Harvard, Colorado, Munich; etc. ni de corrupto al presidente del Comité del Premio Nobel de Física... El 5 de Oct. del 2008 se van a cumplir 3 años que el premio Nobel de física se adjudicó a tres ladrones que me robaron la idea galardonada. Pretendiendo consolidar esta arbitrariedad el 2006 y el 2007 se otorgaron los premios de física a dos ideas, obtenidas por observación, e interpretadas con fundamentos absurdos, como la del expansión de universo, la teoría de los electrones libres, del spin, etc..
A ver con que salen en el 2008. con los premios Nobel; a ver si se siguen burlando del rey de Suecia, que entrega personalmente los premios Nobel; o del presidente de México que tanto se preocupa por defender a los mexicanos de los abusos que se cometen con ellos en el extranjero. Estos dos gobernantes ya debían de saber esto, porque yo me encargué de comunicarme con ellos. Pero si no se le ha dado importancia a mi reclamo, por falta de interés en comunicarles la información que di, o de que alguien considere una necedad mi reclamo no sabe distinguir muchas cosas... Aparte de lo corruptos lo influyentes que pueden dar un reconocimiento oficial, son incompetentes, como alguien que compra fruta para comerse la cáscara y tirar la pulpa; pero aún los mejores instrumentos se echan a perder , si siempre se les da mal uso.
Aunque uno siempre busque las cosas buenas, también se expone a obtener malos resultados. Por lo extenso de mi trabajo de investigación, en muchos de mis temas siempre me ocupé de sus fundamentos, pero no me di tiempo de verlos mas detenidamente, en sus explicaciones y detalles. Claro que esto en cierto modo me hace sentirme incómodo; pero mas incómodo me hubiera sentido al descuidar los fundamentos. Pero en todo esto hay algo muy importante, que ni siquiera me di tiempo de pensarlo. Cuando me robaron la idea del premio Nobel 2005, comencé a protestar por internet, y me empezaron a mandar bombas de virus por el mismo conducto para que no pudiera usar el internet; una señora muy joven que se dio cuenta de esto, me dijo: Que debía de redactar mis trabajos de investigación mas incompletos y menos claros, para evitar que me los pudieran robar tan fácilmente, desde luego sin exagerar demasiado para no quitarles todo su mérito. Involuntariamente así lo hice, por las razones que expliqué, y esto me ha hecho sentir mejor, por lo que dijo la señora mencionada. Ahora que estoy en condiciones de corregir todo, lo hago sin ningún riesgo razonable, con toda calma.
En mi vida me ha tocado ver muchos cambios, generalmente promovidos por los mas influyentes; por ejemplo en Estados Unidos, en Europa y otros países, antes se podía comprobar cuando alguien mandaba un trabajo, porque siempre se daba un acuse de recibo, o se firmaba y sellaba una copia de dicho trabajo; con lo que se podía comprobar la prioridad y evitar muchos actos de piratería. Con lo que respecta al nuevo gobernador de Nuevo León, me sucedió lo mismo con un ayudante de dicho gobernador; por lo cual me quejé con este, y ordenó que se siguieran aceptando y sellando de recibidos mis trabajos, evitando esa actitud retrógrada de algunos países primer mundista.. Aprovecho la presente para hacer un comentario: Me enteré que los niños de primaria tienen que cargar diariamente con un bulto de mas de 8 Kgs. de útiles escolares. Los niños de escasos recursos desarrollan mas sus habilidades ante la escasez; algo semejante puedo decir de los investigadores de los países pobres. Considero que aquí hay una confusión entre cantidad y calidad, mal resuelto; o un interés pecuniario. Cuando yo fui estudiante de primaria con un cuaderno y lápiz recibí una educación comparable a la de mis nietos; y sin un costo exagerado de útiles escolares. Algo similar a lo anterior muchas veces sucede con los investigadores de escasos recursos, Mi protesta contra los influyentes no ha sido en vano; varios catedráticos del ITESM están de acuerdo con mis ideas; posiblemente en universidades de Argentina y Brasil, y posiblemente de países pequeños y mas pobres, como El Salvador también me apoyen; esto último no lo puedo comprobar porque tengo cortado mi correo electrónico para no recibir bombas de virus. Pero esto no me preocupa, porque en realidad el problema no es entre mi (que pretenden considerarme un pobre iluso) y los influyentes; sino entre estos y Dios que estableció todas las leyes de la naturaleza...
Monterrey, México; 2 años 4 meses antigalileicos del siglo XXI (= abril del 2008) Manel de Hoyos Robles.
Sr. Presidente de México: Por este conducto le estoy pidiendo que me ayude por una injusticia muy grande que se está cometiendo conmigo y con México; como se aclara por toda la documentación que simultáneamente le estoy remitiendo. Se que usted es una persona demasiado ocupada, pero también se que tiene personas competentes que le ayudan. Por la atención que preste a mi solicitud, reciba con anticipación todas las gracias y agradecimiento míos y de todo México.
Manuel de Hoyos Robles Químicos 224-1, Colonia Tecnológico Monterrey, N.L. México. Monterrey, N.L. a 25 Nov. / 07
Dr. Mohamad H. Badii Head Graduate Division UANL.
Apreciable Dr.; Me tardé un poco en comunicarme con usted porque quise corregir bien los temas que quiero mandar para que se publiquen, y porque me sentí mal; cada vez que esto me sucede, pienso que me puedo morir; por esto me urge y antes quiero que se reconozca el nombre de mi padre y mío para México, como el nombre de Galileo es para Italia, y el de Newton es para Inglaterra. Este no es un problema científico, sino de muy mala voluntad de algunos... Si en el terreno científico han sido muy injustos con mi padre y conmigo; no quiero que también lo sean con México; por eso también me voy a comunicar con el presidente de la república, mandándole mis temas: MECHANOPHYSICS-A y MECHANOPHYSICS-B; para que se queje con el Rey de Suecia y con el Comité del Nobel de Física. Quizá nuestro Gobernador nos pueda ayudar con su valiosa recomendación.
Junto con este correo le estoy mandando mis temas MECHANOPHYSICS-B. El próximo lunes pienso comunicarme con usted por teléfono, para ponernos de acuerdo y llevarle los temas que deseo se publiquen.
Usted sabe mejor como se remiten los temas para publicarse en la revista científica que usted considere; sin embargo pienso que por su conducto y con el membrete de su Facultad de la UANL, se podrá hacer de acuerdo con la siguiente idea:
Dear Sir: Here annex an investigation work of an ex-catedratic of UANL that is dedicated to the investigation of physics. The themes we want to be published gives a model to explain the differences between the theories of classical physics and the practical observations, due to some abarralogic effects, produced by the movement of the interacting bodies..
Hope you accept our proposition; but any way we anticipate our thanks for any attention you give to our request.
Atentamente: Manuel de Hoyos Robles
CARTA DE BUENA VOLUNTAD:
Oficialmente el 10 de diciembre del 2007 se cumplen dos años de la actitud antigalileica de la física, en pleno siglo XXI. Como el comité mas representativo del progreso de esta ciencia es el Comité del Premio Nobel de la Física; en el año 2005 su presidente corrupto Sine Swanberg, les otorgó este premio a los ladrones de ideas Roy J Gluber, John L. Hall y Theodor W. Hensch, que también son ladrones de dinero, que es lo que vale dicho premio. En el 2006, tratando de proteger el falso prestigio, entre otras cosas de su presidente, se otorgó dicho premio a una idea caduca, como es la de la expansión del universo, y ahora en el 2007 no se otorgó a un descubrimiento, sino a un invento (el disco duro); y también a una técnica que tiene en el sentido directo muy poco de científica; por decir algo, ciertos efectos los aproxima de 1 mm3 a 1/100) mm
3. Con mi modelo de átomos con órbitas poligonales existe la posibilidad de conocer con gran exactitud las propiedades de un solo átomo en forma individual... Con dicha técnica y otras artimañas, esperan que les sirva para ir eliminando honrosamente a la física moderna, que mas que científica está resultando una basura; y también para pretender eliminar deshonrosamente a la física mecanizada, que cada vez les está resultando mas intolerable; aquí me refiero a la nanotecnología Con esto pretenden determinar las propiedades de un átomo con partículas de polvo (o con pequeñas gotas líquidas o gaseosas) formadas por miles de átomos. Pero lo único que están consiguiendo es hacer el ridículo y confirmar todo lo que digo.A principios del siglo XX, al encontrarse diferencias entre las teorías existentes y las observaciones , inmediatamente se desechó la física clásica en beneficio de la moderna, dada por Einstein, Bohr, y otros. Como en 1945 mi padre comprobó que las teorías de la relatividad eran un fiasco, pero al no aceptarse su idea por falta de divulgación; quizá le hicieron un bien a mi padre, porque así un influyente con facilidad de divulgar sus ideas, se hubiera apropiado de las de mi padre. Tengo mas de 40 años combatiendo el fiasco que es la física moderna; pero al contrario que Einstein, nadie me ha querido dar un reconocimiento oficial; pero no es por ignorancia, sino por mala fe, como lo prueban las ideas robadas a las que se les otorgó el Nobel de Física 2005; y también es prueba de esto, que no convienen en aceptar que la física moderna es un fiasco y no quieren resignarse a esto y aceptar inmediatamente las ideas de mi padre y mías; por lo cual le están dando mucha importancia a ciertas ideas, que mas que científicas para ellos, son de transición, como las de nanotecnología con las que pretenden darle dicha transición a la física moderna hacia las ideas de mi padre y mías, apropiándose de ellas, después de que hace muchos años ya las habíamos concebido.
Por este conducto le estoy pidiendo a nuestro presidente que defienda a un conciudadano que ha sido víctima de un robo, que por las circunstancias no corresponde a ningún juez; sino al reclamo de dos gobernantes honorables como son el presidente de México y el Rey de Suecia, contra todos los abusos y arbitrariedades del Comité del Nobel de Física en perjuicio de todo lo decente; pero desde luego en este caso limitándose al perjuicio de un ciudadano mexicano, y de todo México, que por tener investigadores científicos, merece que estos puedan tener un lugar, de acuerdo con su capacidad, como
lo han tenido por ejemplo Galileo y Newton. En mas de 40 años haciendo mi trabajo he logrado un
gran cariño por muchas cosas, que quisiera compartir con todos; es mucho lo que puedo dar y recibir. Para esto hay doscaminos: el del
poder y el de querer; dado el gran egoísmo y corrupción que existe,
escojo a este último. Dice el dicho: Querer es poder; pero hay que querer bastante Para erradicar un mal hay que eliminarlo desde la raíz. Para bien de la ciencia y la decencia yo le pido que me de una
disculpa por escrito, al Comité Nobel de Física.... Monterrey, México; 10 de Dic./07 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
FRANCISCO:
Informe sobre la cooperación del Dr. Mohammed Badii: Como al principio de noviembre tuve la primer entrevista con el y me dijo de dos revistas científicas que podían publicar un artículo sobre mi trabajo; para lo cual se necesitaba mandar las hojas escritas a máquina, por correo ordinario a una de las revistas. Quedamos que yo iba a escribir el trabajo, y el por medio de su Facultad lo iban a mandar a una revista. Como por el 10 de noviembre, por internet le mandé mas de cien páginas de investigación, y con flecha 23 de Nov., por el mismo conducto le mandé otro tanto de mi investigación. El 25 de Nov. me comuniqué por teléfono con el diciéndole que ya tenía listos los escritos que se iban a mandar para publicarse; y su secretaria me dijo que me podía entrevistar al día siguiente con el para tratar mi asunto.
Como mi domicilio está muy lejos de la universidad, me tardé cerca de una hora en llegar (y otra al regresarme). Esta vuelta se hubiera evitado, si se me hubieran aclarado las cosas por teléfono. Como había mucha gente para entrevistar al Dr., nada mas se me concedieron unos cinco minutos, en los que casi no hubo tiempo ni para saludarnos. Aquí me dijo, contradiciendo lo de la primera entrevista, que no se podían mandar escritos, que todo debía ser por correo electrónico. Le dije de los dos trabajos de investigación que le mandé por internet, y me contestó que no se había enterado; cuando menos ppr el primero, o me estaba mintiendo o tenía muy poco interés. En la breve entrevista hizo un comentario como una simple platica, o insinuándome dudas sobre mi trabajo: Dijo que de los trabajos que ellos recibían, como el 40% no servían
Al día siguiente, en un principio pensé en hablarle por teléfono para aclarar todas estas dudas; pero luego pensé que todo el problema consistía en que dicho Dr. no quiere hacer nada en que manifieste algún desacuerdo con los físicos involucrados y sus vigentes teorías, porque piensa que esto le puede afectar en su trabajo. No puedo decir que estoy agradecido de el, pero le deseo mucha suerte en todas sus actividades. Por ejemplo, Don Gonzalo Estrada Cruz es un periodista muy libre y sin ningún compromiso con nadie; que lástima que no esté relacionado en el terreno de la física. Todo esto lo digo, porque si por alguna circunstancia una persona mas importante quisiera ayudarme, se documentaría con alguien que esté mas obligado con dicha persona que con los físicos involucrados y sus vigentes teorías.
Saludos. Monterrey N.L. a 29 de noviembre/07 TÉCNICAS FALSAS (buenas mientras no se acepten otras mejores)
Aquí voy a insistir en algunas cosas, aclarando ciertas ideas. En muchas ocasiones la ciencia se complica al considerar como efectiva alguna idea errónea; esto da lugar a muchas complicaciones y que se distraiga mucho tiempo estudiando algo que a la postre viene resultando algo inútil; y que se subestimen otras ideas que en realidad si son benéficas para el progreso de la ciencia. En las anteriores condiciones están las teorías mal interpretadas que desorientan al funcionamiento y la estructuración de muchos efectos físicos, como las teorías de la relatividad, que mal interpretadas pretenden corregir las diferencias entre las teorías previamente existentes y las observaciones; esto considerando a su concepto de “espacio tiempo” que se pueda deformar.. Lo que con la física mecanizada lo logramos de una manera objetiva al considerar dichas variaciones producidas por efectos aberratorios en los fluidos ínter actuantes, como ya se ha explicado en diferentes ocasiones. Otra mala interpretación ha sido la de considerar la existencia de las fuerzas fuertes, al suponer que el núcleo de los átomos está formado por una partícula unitaria constituida por partículas positivas, que se rechazarían por ser del mismo signo, lo que se evitaría con dichas fueras fuertes que nulificarían la interacción de las cargas positivas. este modelo ha dado lugar a considerar muchas complicaciones y partículas actuantes como los quarks arriba, quarks abajo, quarks extraños, quarks encantos, etc..
Con nuestro modelo de los sistemas binarios de órbitas poligonales, evitamos todas estas complicaciones, porque no es precisamente el signo de las partículas positivas las que producen el rechazo, sino la mutua orientación frontal de estas; que con los sistemas binarios está restringido entre la partícula positiva y la negativa de cada sistema; con lo que no se permite que las cargas positivas del núcleo se orienten como lo consideran, enfrente una de otra.. Otra técnica mal interpretada es la nanotécnica, con la que pretenden conocer las propiedades de un átomo, conociendo las propiedades de una partícula de polvo (de dicho elemento) formada por miles de átomos; aquí cabe considerar que hay propiedades que no cambian si la partícula está formada por miles o por millones de átomos... Si esta técnica exige que todas las partículas ínter actuantes tengan la misma dimensión, no nada más en los sólidos, sino en los líquidos y gases, se producen una serie de complicaciones inútiles y costosas. Por ejemplo en Estados Unidos se hacen estos estudios, y en muchos detalles también de dudosa utilidad, cooperan algunas personas aquí en Monterrey; con lo que se está trabajado para obtener resultados que mas que dar prestigio, podrían resultar obstáculos para obtener la realidad de muchas cosas, y un descrédito a largo plazo para todos los involucrados; como se está demostrando al ignorar a la física mecanizada, que no ha sido concebida en Estados Unidos o en Europa, pero si en México.
Lo que he dicho aquí, no se refiere directamente a ningún problema científico, porque la física mecanizada es muy superior a la moderna, que está plagada de contradicciones y ambigüedades, con lo que se presta a que los influyentes puedan plagiar muchas ideas buenas de investigadores honestos Aquí se trata de algunos de los esfuerzos que se han hecho por robar las ideas de mi padre y mías. Para el que dude de esto, es muy fácil comprobarle su equivocación, entre muchas razones, con: La piratería del premio Nobel de física del 2005. Con el premio Nobel de física del 2006 que se adjudicó a una idea obsoleta y absurda como es la pretendida expansión del universo.. Con el premio Nobel de física del 2007, por las razones ya dichas. Todo esto confirmado porque nadie se atreve a demandarme por difamación, porque saben que tengo la razón
Se ha pretendido que las ideas de mi padre y mías sean ignoradas un tiempo suficiente, para que en un futuro que ellos consideren oportuno, apropiarse de ellas y de todos los méritos... Todo esto que he dicho representa un robo a un ciudadano mexicano y a México; que no lo puede resolver ningún juez, que no tiene que estar enterado de estos problemas científicos; ni tampoco un físico inseguro, que no se sienta con libertad de actuar. Por esto, vuelvo a insistir en que nuestro presidente por conducto del Rey de Suecia puedan intervenir. O en último caso, que se me de dicho reconocimiento aquí en México, y que el premio que me corresponda se le adjudique al Teletón de Tamaulipas y Yucatán. Atentamente: Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
Monterrey, México, diciembre del 2007.
RECONOCIMIENTOS
Con este escrito quiero felicitar al Dr. Oliver Probst por su tema: El Efecto Magnetoresistivo Gigante, publicado en la prestigiosa revista Ciencia, Conocimiento Tecnología, en el cual se interpretaron con efectos condicionales (no reales...) las observaciones (producidas directamente por átomos, no por electrones); por lo cual voy a hacer algunas críticas, no al doctor, sino a la física moderna; lo anterior de acuerdo con los siguiente: Un átomo conductor se caracteriza por sus electrones 7ª órbita, se mueven en la misma órbita, desfasados un tiempo: ≈± t
o; uno magnético por: ≈ tj/4 ± to;; uno aislante, por ≈ tj/2 ± to. La interacción entre átomo productor y receptor es micromolecular.... Con respecto a la velocidad que adquieren los electrones, esta es producida por el incremento de longitud de las órbitas de los electrones debido a un incremento de temperatura del átomo producido por un campo magnético exterior sobre los dos electrones externos, (7ª órbita poligonal, ver tema: Modelo de Imán) cuando se mueven simultáneamente y adyacentes en sus órbitas. Al variar la acción magnética de un imán por la anterior razón y afectar a los átomos de otro elemento magnetizable; va existir una armonía en la variaciones entre sus elementos binarios (ver tema: The Gas Distribution Energy)....Voy a aprovechar este escrito para hablar de los trabajos de investigación hechos por mi hijo, que es médico. Algunos de estos experimentos se hicieron, cuando mi hijo y yo nos dimos cuenta de que tomando los dos electrodos de una máquina productora de una corriente de 0.08 amperes y 10 voltios se producían ionizaciones muy bien distribuidas en el espacio y en el tiempo en los átomos de nuestro organismo, de varios miles de grados, capaces de destruir todos los microorganismos patógenos adyacentes. Por tal motivo lo aplicamos contra los virus del SIDA y comprobamos su efectividad, y tratamos de divulgar esta idea (ver periódico A.B.C de fecha 3 de junio de 1994). En el mismo periódico de fecha 10 de junio de 1994, las personas involucradas en estos problemas nos trataron de charlatanes.
Más después, al darse cuenta de que teníamos razón, hubo muchas personas en diferentes lugares que se quisieron atribuir la primacía de esta idea. Pero esto no les valió, entre muchas cosas por dos razones: no se pueden adjudicar prioridades falsas; esto por un lado, por otro demostraron su incapacidad en demostrar la efectividad del tratamiento, porque no tomaron en consideración que los virus se protegen de la electricidad al introducirse en las células defensivas, ni saber como resolver este problema; finalmente no supieron como comprobar que el paciente estaba libre del virus del SIDA, porque con las pruebas del Western-blot que hicieron lo único que comprobaron fue que las proteínas reportadas eran de los medicamentos, no de los virus.... Lo único que consiguieron fue hacer el ridículo, como se hizo con el premio Nobel de física del 2005.
Por lo dicho anteriormente comprobamos que si queremos que se reconozca oficialmente una prioridad se requiere ser un investigador influyente con prestigio (falso, o correcto...); por esto, no voy a esperar a tener completamente comprobada la investigación de mi hijo, para divulgarla. El está investigando como curar muchas enfermedades con las moléculas de Volta; contra mucho escepticismo y malas voluntades. Para la cura de la diabetes, la molécula de la insulina, trabaja como una multimolécula de DNA... ; para la cura del cáncer hay que saber como librar a las células cancerosas de su glucosa. Si alguien entiende lo que estoy diciendo y tiene todo el apoyo de un investigador profesional, tal vez este se pueda adjudicar alguna prioridad en esto, pero se tendrá que reconocer la prioridad de mi hijo en esta investigación...
Monterrey, México, 20 de diciembre del 2007. Manuel de Hoyos Robes.
THE VOLTA´S MOLECULES. (I)
Here will consider the phenomenon can produce some observed effects. Volta observed that if two flat plates of different metals were in direct contact in their surfaces; for instance: Cu and Al ones; it was produced a difference of electrical potential between them. In this way he conceived the Volta´s piles; this phenomenon and many others are not well explained by modern physics. Here will be consider that when both plates join as was say before, the surface atoms of one plate coincide with the atoms f the other surface; because this, between both atoms is formed a molecule; so, some of their corresponding electros will jump from one atom of a plate to the other one of the other plate.; in this process, also will be produced a stock voltage that will produce a feeble electric current. Other electric currents, that are produced in the free atmosphere can affect in a sensible way the current produce by the stock voltage; due to this, the experiment is made into a metallic cage. The copper plate is connected directly to the cage with a copper wire; and from the cage to the earth; all these without been affected by any external current.
From an scientific magazine: Ciencia Ilustrada, edited in Sao Pablo Brazil (Civita Editors), are given some difference of potential of some metal plates, with respect to the copper one; this difference of potential is equal to the stock voltage: Na → 2.37 eV; Mg → 1.30; Al → 0.95; Zn
→ 0.78; Pb → o.54; Hg → 0.07; Ag → -- 0.05; Au → -- 0.16; Pt → -- 0.24; graphite → -- 0.51
In the theme: How are Formed the Molecules, is given the formula: 1 = r2 (Z / A)3 i, considering that the energy of an atom, of a molecule formed by two atoms is proportional to the square of the velocity of the orbital electron (7 shell) (r2); is inverse proportional to its ionization potential multiplied by the volumetric ionization effect: 1 / [ì (Z / A)3]. 1 (Z / A)3 = unitary volumetric distribution of the (i) effect in one of the atoms of the two interacting plates. In the fore mentioned theme, also is consider, that in order to form a molecule with two atoms, both of them ought to have an equal radius.
Considering the Na plate acting on Cu one: 11Na23; rNa = 1.57 μ; iNa = 5.1 eV;
difference of potential of Na with respect to the Cu one, of the Volta´s molecule = sp = 2.37 eV. 29Cu63.7 rCu = 1.17 μ; iCu = 7.7 eV.
First approximation of the coincident radius of both atoms: r = 0.5 (1.17 + 1.57) 1.37μ; r2 = 1.877 μ. ------ etermination of the first approximation of the ionization potential of the Na aatom of the Volta´s molecule: Na: 1 = r2 (Z / A)3 iNa = 1.877 (11 / 23)3 iNa = 1.877 x 0.1094 i0.2053iNa; iNa = 4.87 eV. For the copper plate we have: Cu: 1 = 1.877 (29 / 63,7)3 iCu = 1.877 (0.09435) iCu = 0.1771 iCu; iCu = 5.645 eV
The definitive ionization potential corresponding to the Cu atom of the Volta´s molecule: iCu = 7.7 – 2.37 = 5.33 eV.. The definitive r2 of the atoms of the Volta´s molecule: r2 = (5.645 / 5.331.877 Cu: 1 = 1.988 x 0.09435 iCu = 0.1876 iCu; Na: 1 = 1.988 x 0.1094 iNa = 0.2175 iNa; iNa = 4.598 eV.
The stock voltage (2.37 eV), is not between the two plates, but between the Cu atoms of the Volta´s molecules and the Cu atoms of the Cu plate. With the fore difference of potential will produce an electric current from the Cu plate, along the Cu wire that unites this plate with the metal cage, and from this to the earth when the molecable electron is in the Cu atom; and vice-versa when this electron is in the Na atom.. Here is produced an alter superconductor current at normal temperature (for instance at: 21o C). There are many things to say about this; but if the most prestige universities do not want to accept any investigation work that is not in accordance with modern physics, and the pirates want to adjudicate my ideas, by now I prefer to omit them.
12Mg24; rMg = 1.36 μ; iMg = 7.6 eV.; stock potential = sp = 1.30
r = 0.5 (1.17 + 1.36) = 1..265 μ; r2 = 1.600 . . . .
Cu: 1 = 1.600 (29 / 63.7)3 iCu = 1.600 x 0.09435 iCu = 0.151 iCu; iCu = 6.624 eV.
Definitive: iCu
= 7.7 – 1.30 = 6.4 eV.
.r2 = 1.600 x 6.624 / 6.4 = 1.656; r = 1.287 μ
Cu: 1 = 1.656 x 0.09435 iCu = 0.1562 iCu;
iCu = 6.4 eV
13Al27 rAl = 1.25 μ; iAl = 6.0 eV. sp = 0.95 eV.
r = 0.5 (1.17 + 1.25) = 1.21 μ; r2 = 1.464. . . .
iAl = 7.7 –0.95 = 6.75 eV.; definitive radius: r = 1.253 μ; r2 = 1.57
iCu = 6.75 eV.
30Zn65; rZn = 1.25 μ; iZn = 5.4 eV.; sp = 0.78 eV….
iZn = 6.92 eV; r2 = 1.532;
iCu = 6.92 eV
82Pb207; rPb = 1.54 μ; iPb = 7.4 eV.; sp = 0.54 eV…..
iCu = 7.16 eV; r2 = 1.488;
iCu = 7.16 eV.
50Sn118; rSn = 1.41 μ; iSn = 7.3 eV, sp = 0.48 eV…..
iCu = 7.22 eV; r2 = 1.373;
iCu = 7.22 eV.
- - - -- --- - -
83Bi209; rBi = 1.52 μ; iBi = 8 eV; sp = 0.14….
iCu = 7.56 eV; r2 = 1.4018;
iCu = 7.56 eV.
26Fe56; rFe = 1.17 μ; iFe = 7.9 eV; sp = 0.13 eV….
iCu = 7.57 eV; r2 = 1.4;
iCu =.7.57 eV.
80Hg201; rHg; = 1.44 μ iHg = 10.4 eV; sp = 0.07 eV....
iCu = 7.63 eV; r2 = 1.389;
iCu = 7.63 eV.
47Ag108; rAg = 1.34 μ; iAg = 7.6 eV; srp = --0.05....
iCu = 7.75 eV; r2 = 1.3675;
iCu = 7.75 eV.
79Au197; rAu = 1.34 μ; iAu = 9.2 eV sp = --0.06 eV.....
iCu = 7.76 eV; r2 = 1.3657;
iCu =7.76 eV.
78Pt195; rPt = 1.29 μ; iPt = 9.0 eV; sp = --0.24 eV....
iCu = 7.94 eV; r2 = 1.3348;
iCu = 7.94 eV.
6C12; rC = 0.77 μ; iC = 11.3 eV; sp = 0.51 eV.....
iCu = 8.21 eV; r2 = 1.2906;
iCu = 8.21 eV.
Monterrey, México, April 17, 2006
Manuel de Hoyos Robles
Por medio de la televisión me enteré de que unos médicos españoles hicieron una operación quirúrgica, que tengo entendido no se había hecho con anterioridad; o sea injertar el antebrazo y mano a una mujer . Supuestamente el miembro injertado y la persona receptora tienen el mismo tipo sanguíneo; sin embargo pienso que el efecto de rechazo se puede reducir mas si a la persona receptora se le inyectan partículas coloidales de moléculas de Volta (ver tema: The Volta Molecules).
M0onterrey, México, Dic. 12, 2006 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
SUPERCONDUCTORS (I) (checked)
Since long time ago the theory of the free electrons has been accepted, and in the present time most of the physicists accept it. In other themes of this work have mentioned why we do not accept that theory. In the beginning of the first part (mechanophysics I) of this work is given a model of electric current we consider by far more logic and simple and that harmonize very well with other physical problems, and also with the problem will be seen in this theme.
Obviously, in order to discover the superconductivity of the electric current, first was discovered the normal current, as is well know by most people The superconductivity was discovered by Kamedlungh Onnes in 1911; when he was studding the variation of the resistance of a mercury conductor at very low temperatures; above 5o K the resistance diminishes at a very low rate; but at 4o.28, 4o.26 K he observed a sudden drop, seem as a null resistance. He found similar results with other electric conductors working at temperatures lower than 20o K. These temperatures were called: transition temperatures. In 1918 Onnes made other experiment with 700 m of lead cable winded as a solenoid, to which he inducted an electric current, and afterward he refrigerated it in liquid helium. After 24 hours the current continued flowing in the wire.
Because all the fore one, he thought that with a very much thin conductor wire, at transition temperature, it was possible to transport a big quantity of electron current if the conductor was affected by a big potential difference. when the conductor was at lower temperature than the transition one. But this did not happened, because after some increment of the voltage the superconductor was transformed in normal conductor, in spite of its low temperature. The interpretation was given to this, is that if the voltage is incremented, this produces magnetic fields. In the study of the superconductivity was seen that is not produced any magnetic field. With the electric theory of the free electrons can be explained very well the relation between the resistance of the conductor and the production of the magnetic fields. This because for produce such fields is required some energy that is equal to the resistance of the conductor. In mechaophysics we are in accordance with this, as will be seen forward.
Fist will be see the theory in accordance with the interpretation given by modern physics, and afterward in accordance with mechanophysics; in this way will be understand better this problem. In modern physics are required some conditions for the superconduction; of course a lower temperature than the transition one. They also accept that the current remain after the difference of potential has finished. There ought to be an energy in form of heat that make the current to continue flowing. In some way these seem contradictory, because it is supposed there is not required any energy for the superconductor to works. The only way to explain this is considering there is not lost of energy; and that the liberated one (in form of heat) is employed for not reduce the effect produced by the difference of potential that made the flow of the electrons of the superconductor. But this is not our problem, but of modern physics. In accordance with modern physics, the temperature that could be produced due to the flow of the electric current in the metals of the conductor could be eliminated (liberated) in two ways: by the effect of the photons; and by the current electrons. This is because the superconductors are not good conductors of heat
If a superconductor is affected by a magnetic field, it lost its superconductivity. In the superconductors have been see that the electrons do not increment their kinetic energy with the change of temperature; this means that they do not conduct any increment of temperature due to the effect of flow of current in the superconductor; then the elimination of heat by the fore reason, is produced by the photons. The effect of the photons is manifested by the vibration of the atoms, and this vibration can change between certain limits without affecting the superconductivity; this in accordance with theories of modern physics. Has been observed in the isotopes, that the heavier ones are better conductors (superconductors). This could be explained considering that a heavier atom is affected by a less intensity vibration than a lighter one.
Maybe the first model to explain the superconductivity, was that between their atoms there is a space in which the current electrons can move freely, without any obstacle; about this there are some points not so clear. Maybe the most resent accepted model of superconductor is due to Bardeen, Cooper, and Schieffer; they considered that the superconductivity is due to a minimum state of energy of the current electrons when the transition temperature is reached. In this condition are formed the so called: Cooper´s pairs; consist in the union of two current electrons, spinning one in opposite direction than the other, in such way that the magnetic fields of one is nullified by the magnetic field of the other one. Originally I conceived other model of superconductor, based in the idea that they do not produce magnetic fields. In the model of electric current of electrons moving along multimolecules, it was consider that in the conductor wire are formed the multimolecules when is a difference of potential between both extremes of the conductor. These multimolecules were adjacent one to each other, parallel along the conductor wire and coincident the extreme of them in such way that in a given cross section of the conductor all their extremes coincide. In my original model I considered that when the transition temperature is reached in the conductor the chain of multimolecules were equal, except that half of them were displaced longitudinally half the distance of a multimolecule, with respect to the other half. In a transversal way a chain of multimolecules is adjacent to other chain of multimolecule displaced half length of a multimolecule, and so on. In the fore condition, each current electron does not move along a whole multimolecule; but when it has moved half distance of a multimolecule, jumps to the adjacent chain of multimolecules, were also moves half distance of a multimolecule; and so on; in such way that never reaches the end of any multimolecule, so that never is reached any ionization effect in all the chain of multimoecules, and because this is not produced any ionization, and of course any magnetic field around the superconductor.
In all the fore mentioned models have been consider that does not exist any resistance in the flow of electrons in the superconductor; but this is not logic, so we can not accept as good such models. For produce any current it is required some ionization effects and these effects produce the magnetic effects. In the examples given in the fore paragraph was not consider any lost of energy of ionizations produced by the current electrons on the last atom of a chain of multimolecules. This is correct; what is not correct is that such ionizations were not produced. In our new model will be seen forward will be consider this energy of ionization, but here will consider that is not produced by the current electron, but by the energy is required to maintain the transition temperature not to grow. The ionization effects are not produced directly by the current; as was say before, but by other actions completely independent of the current, as is the energy required to maintain the temperature bellow the transition one. With this we see that it is illusory the idea that with the superconduction could be too much economic and can be obtained with less energy than that it can produce. So, the experiment that Onnes made with very much thin conductor wires for to obtain much current, could not work, because the small quantity of multimolecules could have such conductor.
In 1933 Messner discovered an effect that has his name. If is introduced a block of aluminum with normal temperature, into a magnetic field, the magnetic lines are not affected by the block; they move without any direction change into the block, as if it did not exist or it were thoroughly transparent to such lines. If the block has a temperature equal to the transition one, no magnetic lines will penetrate into the block, they will deflect skirting the block. This can be interpreted as the low temperature of the aluminum superconductor can produce a magnetic field, equivalent to the ionization effect produced by the current electrons in each last atom of a chain of multimolecules.
In the present time have been study, for to obtain superconductors with alloy of metals; for instance, we have silicon with fusion temperature = 1420o C; and cooper with fusion temperature = 1083o C. If we make an alloy of both elements, maybe they can get mixed at 1420o C. With a mathematical criterion, when the fore alloy gets a temperature of 23o C, the cooper that is a good conductor will be at a tension fatigue; and the silicon will be at an equal fatigue, but of compression. Now lets see the problem, considering only the conductor element of cooper in other way, at 23o C If we fix the cooper wire, in order can not change its longitudinal length; and afterward it gets a transition temperature; at this temperature the wire will have a tension fatigue, that could be equal to that the element cooper got in the alloy at the 23o C; this can be verify if the proportion of the elements in the alloy is the correct one, taking in account their physical and mechanic properties of both elements. With this is obtained a condition (tension fatigue) of a superconductor of cooper, but at 23o C of temperature, and maybe it is obtained a superconductor (with the alloy) at 23o C.
Monterrey, Mexico, July 5, 2004.
Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
THE PLASMA (MAGNETISM) (I) (corrected theme)
In the study of plasma we have to consider two parts: The part that produces the magnetic field; and the part that is affected by such fields. Since was discovered that around a conductor wire is produced a magnetic field, have been see several ways to produce such fields; maybe the most practical one for produce a concentric magnetic field is a conductor wire rolled up in form of circular loops. In our numerical example will consider the loops forming a cylindrical coil or ring. In the same plane is the ring, in the center of it, will be consider that is the part or matter that is affected by the magnetic field. This problem has been solved in an experimental way in the practice. Considering that all the electrons of the electric current in the coil, contribute for the positive particles to produce the magnetic field and its effects; also they do not define all the effects, but only those that are appreciate in a direct way. In our numerical example will be determine all these effects and the interaction between them and the positive particles of the binary systems..
It has been observed that the moving electrons can be deviated when they are affected by a magnetic field; because this, the orbital electrons of the atoms are affected by such field; by one side reduce their intensity; and by other side increment their temperature and also their radiuses, etc. In two parallel conductor wires there are attraction forces between the current electrons of one wire with respect to the current electrons of the other wire, when their orbits grow (increment of temperature), if the electrons move in the same direction and parallel (with their axis parallel), and at constant distance. Can be produced heat, compressing the atoms that are affected by the magnetic force, as was say in the theme: Pressure and Temperature. In the themes: How are Formed the Atoms, and: How are Formed the Molecules, has been see that when the atoms get radiuses bigger than the fundamental ones, their orbital electrons get more kinetic energy than their normal one; because this, they have more capacity to interchange more energy in form of heat. A body affected by a magnetic field gets more temperature. In this conditions such atoms liberate heat corpuscles; in such way that if more intense is the magnetic field, more heat is liberated
With the numerical exampel will be consider how is the interaction between the producer of the magnetic field and the body affected by such field. In other problems have been defined in a direct way the interaction between two bodies or two particles; for instance,: two celestial bodies, spaced at a distance L, attract one to each other with equal energy. Same thing could be say with two opposite electric charge particles, spaced a distance L´; that are affected one to each other. In classic and modern physics this is explained considering the action of the so called fields of forces. With the fore explanation is not defined the field and how it acts. In mechanophysics has been consider not fields of forces, but inductive fields; formed by ultramicroscopic particles emitted by the interacting particles or bodies; and when such particles reach the interacting bodies or particles, they stimulate the mentioned particles or bodies for produce the attraction (or rejection) energy. This last explanation, by far, is more objective, nevertheless does not define how are produced those inductive particles and how they act, as have been observed. By now we know how they act, and considering this, as valid for other phenomena, will apply a similar idea for the interaction of magnetic effects, The part that produces the magnetic field requires some energy for to do this. And the part (body or particle) affected by this, will act with the same energy; as happens with the gravity and the Coulombs ´fields. Here will not pretend to obtain exact values, because the radii of the atoms are different in the different elements. Here will be used the data given tin the table at the end of mechanophysics , for obvious reasons.
Here will be explained first how are produced the magnetic fields in the circular loops forming the coil. In this coil move the orbital electrons as have explained in other themes, along the chain of atoms forming the multimolecules. Every 2.5 x 106 multimolecules = (2.5 x 106)2 atoms, the last atom of a chain of multimoleules gets ionised, that is transformed in a positive charge; in this way can produce an electric positive field; this field will affect the atoms of the material into the surface of the circular coil. We suppose all the electron orbits of all the atoms that are into the mentioned surface are affected in a similar and approximate way; here will study the seven orbit.
Let see a numerical example of conductor: wire of copper (i = 7.7 eV) forming a coil with circular loops with: r L = 0.30 m.; in the conductor wire flows a current of: I = 6.5 x 10--10 electrons / Sec.; with the fore current and the dimension of a loop can find the temperature and the compression of the atoms affected by the magnetism produced by the coil. Diameter of a copper atom: 2 rc = 2 x 1.17 x 10--10 m = 2.34 x 10--10 m
In
other themes has seen that that in an electric current every (2.5 x 106)2 quantity of atoms, isionized one. L = 2 p rL = 2 p 030 = 1.885 m Length of a multimolecule: Lm = 2.5 x 106 x 2.34 x 10--10 = 5.95 x 10--4 m Lenght of a chain of multimolecules: lSm = 2.5 x x 106 x 5.95 x 10--4 = 1,487.5 m Quantity of chain of mulumolecules there are in a loop ni = L / LSm = 1.885 / 1,487.5 = 0.0012672 / loop: qi = I ni = 6.5x 1010 x 0.00012672 = 8.6 x 106 atoms = 8.6 x 106 x 7.7 x 1.6 x 10--19 = 9.9324 x 10--11 eV. Fc1 = K qn q1 / L2 = 9 x 109 (9.9324 x 10-11 x 1.6 x 10--19) / 0.32 =1.5892 x 10--21 newton Work can do with the fortheforce (forming the binary system) : W1= F1 r1 = 1.5892 x 10--21 x 0.30 = 4.7676 x10--22 joule Applying the Boltzmann¨s formula: T = 2 K / 3 k = 2 x4.7676 x 10--22 / (3 x 1.38 x 10—23) = + 23o of incrementn the solution of this problem could be some doubts. First, in the coil can have positive charges that form a positive field affecting the atoms of the material that is into the coil; but this material is a neutral one, and the general idea is that for the Coulomb’s formula, this works between the action of two charges spaced a given distance. In our problem the production of the positive field by the coil, is clear. In the affected matter into the coil there are no free charges, only neutral atoms: nevertheless, in the fore operations was obtained double energy in the affected atoms, than in the lionized positive charges of the coil. But really a neutral atom is formed by two binary system in the seven shell, and it is supposed that one of them is the affected by the magnetic field, in such way that it is formed by two charges; the positive is rejected by the magnetic field, and the negative (orbital electron) is attracted by such field. In this way can be explained the compression effect that is produced in the atoms of the affected material, and also the double energy given by the last formula, with respect to the formula of Boltzmann applied to the energy that produced the magnetic field. Even the attraction as the rejection effects are produced by some fluids; with this can be explained the heat produced by these fields.
Monterrey, México,Febrauary, 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
Aquí quiero honrar a Galileo, valorando el gran beneficio que recibió la humanidad con su trabajo de investigación, y reprochando el pago que se e dio por esto. Con estas lineas le doy mi reconocimiento. Mi padre comprobó que las teorías de la relatividad estaban equivocadas. Yo tengo mas de 40 años de investigar en la física; si se me reconociera esto se beneficiaría grandemente la humanidad; pero no como se hizo con el premio Nobel de física 2005, en que se premió a los que me robaron una parte limitada de esta. MI reclamo por esto, que mas bien lo he hecho pensando en el bien de la humanidad, no ha sido atendido. El Nobel de física 2006 se adjudicó a una idea basada en un fiasco, como es la expansión del universo. A ver que sucede en el 2007, porque la altanería es mas fuerte que la verdad para algunos que no entienden que aceptar la verdad con humildad dignifica. Se es grande por los bienes espirituales; por los materiales, muchas veces cualquier ladrón o corrupto puede aparentar que lo que no es.
THE TCHERENKOV´S RADIATION. (corrected theme)
Many tunes I have say that the theory of relativity born death (and also all modern physics), because when the theory was accepted, it was well known that the velocity of light was not a constant of the Universe, because in a refringent medium it has less velocity than in empty space. Here there is not any valid interpretation to deny this. Many times I have say that if a ray of light is emitted from a moving system in empty space, this ray will have the velocity (c) of light
the velocity (v) of the moving system. If this has not been proven in the practice, is because has not been other Michelson that do this. But not only in empty space could be incremented the light velocity, as was say before, but also into a refringent medium, as was proved with the Tcherenkov´s radiations. But if the same Tcherenkov and all the physicists interpreted in other way this problem, they did not prove that light was not a constant of the Universe.
The scientists that work near a nuclear reactor have get used to see an intense light of a greenness blue color in the water in which is submerged the fusion mass. Who see this for first time, gets too intrigued. This phenomenon was interpreted since 1934 by the mentioned physicist, and afterward by many others, as a radiation moving at faster velocity than light; and because this, is strange that at the present time many physicists believe that light is a universal constant.
The Tcherenkov´s raqdiation will be consider the condition in wich the orbital electrons are ionezed with a magnitude given by: v
^1 = 2,160 Km. / Sec. Ki = 0.5 me v^12 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10--31 x 2,160,0002 = 2.125 x 10--18 m / Sec. as if the electron were a propeller particle m^ = 9.1091 x 10--31 Kg., at velocity: v 1 = 2.16 x 106 m / Sec. In the fore condition will consider a binary system in wich the electron moves¿ = 14 vertices. In each vertex the interacting energy between both particles will be: K1 = 0.5 me v^2 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10--31 x 691002 = 2.1747 x 10--21 joule / vertex. This happens during 14 vertices; and in each vertex the fore energy is accumulated in the electron,so that this value is employed for liberate the electron from the positive particle, that in half orbit produces such separation: S K1 = 28 (14 + 1) x 2.1747 x 10--21 = 3.046 x 10--20 joules. After such separation, the space between both particles will grow , but then the electron will emits an opposite flluid, equal to: 3.046 x 10--20 ; opposing the separation of the binary system:Velocity that gets the electron with the flid S K1 : S K1 = 3.046 x 10--20 joules = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10--31 ve2 = 4.5516 x 10--31 ve2; ve = (3.046 x 10--20 / 4.5516 x 10--31)0.5 = ( 6.6878 x 10102)0.5 = 2..58608 x 106 m / Sec. 9.1091 x 10--31 x (2..58608 x 106 )2 = 3.046 x 10--20 The force: S K1 = 3.046 x 10--20 joules ; acting in an interior way and in opposite direction of the posoitive particle of the binary system; is produced by a propeller particle: m^ = 3.046 x 10--20 / 0.5 c2 = 6.769 10--357 Kg. After the electron recede from its positive particle M^ will acts, in an exterior way, trying to get near of its posive particle, in order to preserve the binaary system; this with a velocity of: c¨ = c + ve = 3 x 108 + 2.586 x 106 = 3.00256 x 108 m / Sec.. The frequency of the radiation will be: n : n h = 6.6256 x 10--34 n = S K1 = 3.046 x 10--20 joules n = 3.046 x 10--20 / 6.6254 x 10--34 = 4.7 x 1013 in the air, in the water will be: n´ = (2.25 / 3) = 3.52 x 1013 . .. . . .
. . . . , . . . . .
n = (3,046 x 10--29 / 6.056 x 10--20 x (3 x 108 /2.36 x 10--8) = 6.131 x 1015 corpusacles
l´ = c / n = 3 x 108 / 6.131 x 1015 = 4.89 x 10--7 m. As the fore corpuscles are emitted when the electron is moving at a velocity (ve ), the value l´ will demineshes: 0. me ve2 = 0.5 x 9.10591 x 10--31 ve2 = 3.4046 ve2 = (3.046 x 10--29 / 0.5 x 9.0591 x 10--31)0.5 = 2.?????¿¿¿¿ l = 4.89 x 10--7 x 2,86 x 10--8 / (2.86 x 108) =2.25 x 108 m / Sec. = light velocity of the radiation. c1´ = 2.25 x 108 + 28
PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE (II) (checked) ?
In the first theme with this name was demonstrated how a big pressure reduces the diameter of the atoms in such way than the dimension get smaller than the seven shell, for instance, the orbital electrons of such shells get free, so that with a velocity equal to: v
7 are able to produce heat in the medium in which is realized the shrink of the atoms. Do not find any objection in the fore explanations, on the contrary are find very much logic and coincident with some practical observations; here will be see the problem from other point of view, as will be explained later, will not precipitate in give explanations, next will determine some characteristics of our Sun. The gravity acceleration in the surface of it is:g = G M / r
2 = 6.673 x 10—11 x 1.985 x 1030 / (7 x 108)2 = 270.32 m / Sec. In the theme Gravity Force was obtained the time of liberation as follow:Half of the fore velocity is for to nullify the resistance produced by the celestial body (the Sun); this resistance is manifested by the velocity that had the orbital electrons when they worked producing internal energy into the atoms, before these were compressed; and after the compression work as free particles producing external energy. The gravity in the Sun is so strong that not only affects the exterior shells of the atoms, but also some interior ones, as will be seen forward, in such way, that , some of the shells of the atoms are destroy and their orbital electrons get free, producing external energy, manifested as heat, due to the kinetic energy that had the orbital electrons of the disintegrated shells. Here it is pertinent to remember how the orbital electrons move around the nuclei of the atoms (how move as binary systems). In the seven shell the orbital electrons deflect in each vertex, due to the action of the
m⊥7 particle, that produce a velocity of deflection v⊥7 = 69,100 m / Sec.; in the six shell have: m⊥6 and v⊥6 = 93,979 m / Sec.; in . . . . the second shell: m⊥2 and v⊥2 = 826,580 m / Sec.Our next step is to relate the liberation velocity of the Sun with the deflection velocity of the atoms: v
⊥n; here the fore value is an average one, due to the velocity of the orbital electrons liberated of the disintegrated shells.The energy of the liberation velocity is: K
L = 0.5 me ve2 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10--31 x 615,1862 = 1.723687 x10--19 joule The fore velocity correspond to a temperature: Tn = 2 KL / 3 k = 2 x 1.723687 x 10--19 / 3 x 1.38 x 19--23 = 8,327º KIn accordance with the accepted theories, in the surface of the Sun the temperature is about 5,000
o K and into the Sun can be several millions degree of temperature. The datum of temperature in the surface is easy to prove with direct observations. The temperuture obtained before is bigger than the observed one; with this is concluded that the heat radiated by the surface of the Sun is bigger than the heat that the surface receives from the inner caps of it. But we consider the problem is is not so simple as was say, there are many factprs have not take in account. The data of the interior temperatures, only could be suppose, in order to be in accordance with some accepted theories, that we consider are too far from reality. With our model are simplify so many facts, and because this ought to be study with special interest this theme.With all have say here, in my protocol begins to understand how the energy is not lost, but transmit from one particle to another one, and with this criterion is get the idea that all the stars can produce energy during infinite time, with out exhaust; maybe they have an evolution process, after which they return to their original condition, and so on. Determine the inherent temperature of the Earth with this model of liberation velocity. v
e =(r g)0.5 = (6,378,163 x 2 x 9.81)0.5 = 11,187 m / Ses. KL = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10--31 x 11,1872 = 5.7 x 10--23 joule Tn = 2 x 5.7 x 10--23 / 3 x 1.38 x 10--23 = 2.o75KMonterrey, México, April 15, 2000 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
THE RADII OF ATOMS: He, Ne, Ar, Kr; Xe.
In the table of radii of the atoms of the periodic table are given the radii of all the atoms, except those of the extreme right column. In accordance with the tables of radii and ionization potentials , we have seen that for an atom that has two molecable electrons in the seven shell, one of them, that is the first binary system, gets ionized first; the condition for this is that the radius of the atom that is going to get ionized gets the required conditions for this, in accordance with the formula:
1≈ i ra (A / K)3. Although the second binary system does not get ionized with the value of (Ii) given in the table; also gets some degree of excitation when the first binary system got ionized; but the second system needs more excitation than the first one; so, remains with its negative particle (its electron).From all say in the fore paragraph is concluded that the ionization of a binary system is a function of the radius of it. In the tables of ionization the values of ( i) for the atoms of the extreme right column, are those that affect simultaneously the two binary systems of the seven shell; as both system are in equal structural conditions, we deduce that half of the ionization correspond to the first binary system, and the other half to the second binary system. In accordance with this here will be determine the radii of the mentioned atoms, with the following numerical examples:
2He4; i = 24.6 eV.; He; 12.3: 1 = 12.3 rHe2 (A / Z)3 = 12.3 rHe2 (2 / 4)3 = 1.538 rHe2; rHe2 = 1 // 1.588 = 0.63 rHe = 0.80 μ 10Ne20; i = 21.6 eV. Ne; 10.8: 1 = 10.8 rNe2 (10 / 20)3 = 1.35 rNe2 ; rNe2 = 0.741; rNe = 0.861 μ. 18Ar40: i = 15.8 eV.: Ar; 79: 1 = 7.9 rAr2 (18 / 40)3 = 0.72 rAr2; rAr2 = 1.389; rAr = 1.179 μ. 36Kr84: i = 14 eV: Kr; 7.0: 1 = 7.0 rKr2 (36 / 84)3 = 0.551 rKr2; rKr2 = 1.848; rKr = 1.347 μ.Monterrey, México, March / 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
ESTRUCTURAL MODEL OF RESISTANCE. (corrected theme)
In a macroscopic body with a tension or a compression forces; such body can get broken, seems as the atoms or molecules get separated one with each other. At atomic magnitudes, the electrons and the positive particles (nuclei…) in a material way are separated; same thing can be say about. the molecules that have their atoms united one from each other by the molecable electrons. Also the same thing can be say of the multimolecules. With all these can be appreciated that with the macroscopic body can not get a good idea how the bodies affected by compression or tension forces, can fail. The only thing that gets clear, is that the energy (fatigue) of the orbital electron is relative too big compared with the energies that affect the macroscopic bodies; this will be clear in the next paragraphs. In modern physics it is consider that the resistance of a body is due to the electric attraction forces there are between the atoms of the body. This explanation is not so clear, because we suppose that most of the atoms of the body are neutral particles.
In our model we will consider that the atoms of a body are united by the electrons in a similar way than the molecable electrons unite the atoms of a molecule. For understand better the problem let see the behavior of an orbital electron moving around the nucleus of an atom in the seven shell or orbit. In a vertex of such orbit is produced a velocity: v
^7 = 69,100 m / Sec. (due to the propeller particle m^7, (see forward) that deflects its orbit; this happens in each atom of the bodySince was seen the theme: Velocity of Sound was given the relation that exist between the velocity of sound and the resistance of a material, in accordance with the formula: v
s = (E g / w)0.5 . Sound moves in the sever orbit electrons. Considering an isometric distribution of atoms, an electron moves along (n) orbits (7 shell) while the sound advances a diameter of atom at velocity (vs). when the electron has made 2 n half orbits, the sound had advanced a diameter of atom. When the electron has moves 2 n half orbits: the m⊥7 particle transmits to the adjacent electron of the forward atom the sound effect. With a model is consider that an orbital electron of the seven shell, moves (n) orbits while the sound advances one diameter of the atom. After this the effect of sound advance to the forward atom, in which its orbital electron moves also (n) orbits and the sound advance one diameter of atom; and so on. . . In each time of orbit, a propeller particle m^7 acts with an impulse equal to: v^7 me for to advance to the electron of the forward atom; an so on during (n) times in the multimolecules that are formed when the sample is affected by a tension or a compressionWill be consider that for the sound advance as was say, it is requires an energy for pass from one atom to the adjacent one. For the electron to deflect in a vertex (7 orbit) it is required a velocity: v
^7 = 69,100 m / Sec.; the impulse to do this is: fv´ = v^7 me = 69,100 x 9.1091 x 10—31 = 6.294 x 10—26 Kg m /Sec.The fore impulse is produced every time of vertex: t
v7 = 8.27 x 10—17 Sec. is: fv = fv´ / tv = 6.294 x 10—26 / 8.27 x 10—17 = 7.611 x 10—10 Kg m / Sec.2 = 7.611 x 10—10 / 9.81 = 7.7584 x 10---11 Kg. Quantity of atoms there are in a area of 1 m2: n = 1 / (2r7)2 = 1 / (2 x 1.13763 x 10—10)2 = 1.9317 x 1019 atoms / m2 Will consider the sound moving in an iron rod. Velocity of sound: vs = (E g / Δ)2 = (2.1 x 1010 x 9.81 / 7800)0.5 = 5,106 m / Sec.When an orbital electrons makes (2 n) half orbits the sound advance a diameter of atom. In the model will give here of structural resistance, this is produced by the action of a propeller particle m
⊥7 acting in a molecable electron; this particle jumps from such electron to other one of the adjacent atom, when is affected by an broken impulse. This propeller particle, not only produce attraction between the negative particle and the positive one of a binary system, trying to avoid they fail; but also acts in a synchronized way in the solid bodies, trying to attract the adjacent atoms to be in contact with its own one. Similar thing happens with the atoms of the multimolecules in which flow the current electrons. In the liquid substances this effect is reduced.When a solid body is affected by some vibrations ,as that of sound, the contact between the adjacent atoms is reduced, also the structural resistance. When a solid fails due to the action of a force, is produced a vibration in that solid body; if the force is enough big is produced a separation between their atoms, and the molecable electrons try to move from their shells to subshells.. The lineal advance of the effect of m
⊥7 is (n) times faster than the lineal advance of the sound. This is all right, but the orbital electrons have two orbits in the seven shell, so they have double resistance. Here will consider that sound has the value given before, because the iron works in an elastic way; if it lost its elasticity due to the effort it is affected; also will be lost its sound velocity, due to the same reasonConsidering the two half orbits of the seven shell of the electrons affected by sound, we have: 2 v7 / π = 2 x 308,570 / π = 196,442 m / Sec. The lineal velocity of the sound in iron is. vs = 5,106 m / Sec. Relation between both velocities: n
Fe = (2 v7 / π) / vs = 196,442 / 5106 = 39 he deflection fatigue F> of the orbital electron, expressed in Kgs / m2 is: F> = f> n = 7.7584 x 10—11 x 1.9317 x 1019 = 1.49869 x 109 Kgs / m2 = 149,869 Kgs / cm2 The failing elastic fatigue of iron rod will be: F = F> / nFe = 149,869 / 39 = 3,843 Kgs / cm2If we can avoid all the vibrations in the iron; then the propeller particle n⊥7 only will acts for to jumps from one electron of an atom to the electron of the adjacent atom in a time of orbit: to = 28 t>. In this condition, we will have: F = F> / 28 = 149,869 / 28 = 5,352 Kgs./ cm2.
For water we have: v
s = 1,450 m / Src. nw = (2 v7 / π) / vs = 196,442 / 1,450 = 135 F> = 149,869 Kgs / cm2 (compression fatigue) Failing fatigue: F = 149,869 / 135 = 1,119 Kgs / cm2 When water is compressed till the fatigue (F), the seven shell electrons jump to a 7 sub-shell . . . (?), or reduces its confined voume (see theme: Model of Refringent Substance-I-)Monterrey, México; February /2005.; july 2006; March /07 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
Pienso que a los doctores especialistas de Monterrey, excepto el Dr. José Manuel Ramírez Aranda les hace falta ser más humildes y aceptar muchas verdades que les van a permitir curar la enfermedad producida por el virus VIH.
Pienso que los grandes físicos, químicos, biólogos del mundo son mucho más humildes y que muy pronto aceptar muchas verdades que indirectamente van a permitir solucionar este problema.
M ODEL OF CONDUCTION OF HEAT (corrected theme)
There is the idea that the conduction of heat is produced by vibration effects: Maybe this is correct in some partial way, from a mathematical point of view; nevertheless I have other ideas for the conduction of heat, that seem more in accordance with the production of the specific heat, and maybe with other heat phenomenon. In our model is considered that heat in form of particles of corpuscles m
h propagates along multimolecules, as do the electric current electrons. The particles mh join with the particles m^7. Because this the radius of the active atom grows Δr in each vertex; due to this and to the modulus of elasticity E of the atoms of the plate, in each radial direction of each vertex is produced a fatigue in a length of the magnitude of a multimolecule of: fs = Δr E / l,m every time of orbit. But this problem will be study in other theme.I in a metallic plate is produced heat in one side of it; logically it will flows to the opposite side of it; bit at the same time, this heat will try to flow parallel to the side were in which is produced such heat. The model will give here, consider both kinds of flow, not in the instant they initiate, but when they get regulated flow. If we want to know the temperature of a gas, or of a liquid, or of any substance, we can determine them considering a big quantity of atoms or molecules of them. If it is wanted to determine such temperature taking in account only one atom or molecule of the substance will obtain wrong results; much lower or much higher temperatures than the average ones given by many atoms or molecules. This can be proved studding the Brownian movement , in which some particles with determine mass move at much higher kinetic energy than the corresponding to the temperature of the liquid. In our model of electric current it is considered that the last atoms of the multimolecules get much higher temperature than the rest ones of such multimolecule, and also those adjacent to such atom. Will consider that the conduction heat is distributed in the atoms of a body in form of a particle of corpuscles mh, as those of the propeller ones m
^7; these particles are into the orbital electrons (seven shell); the electron moves around the atom during a time of jump and at the same time transmits the heat particle to the adjacent atom of a multimolecule, as will be explained better in forward paragraphsFor to explain the conduction of heat in a body it is required to know how it enters to the body; what part is absorbed by the body; and what part flows over it and afterward leaves the body in a radiation or convection way. Here will be made a model trying to explain all these processes in the most simple and harmonic way . The conduction of heat in a metallic plate from one hotter side to the opposite one, result more illustrative in the in the model we will give here. We consider that all the atoms that are in the hotter side of the plate absorb the heat is produced in such side. Here will take a small surface A of the plate. In figure (1) is show A
1 (continuous line); A2 (pointed line). A = A1 + A2; This surface seems as a rectangle; really are two spiral areas with a thick equal to Lm. In the lines (continue, pointed one), every distance Lm is indicated by a point; in the vertices, also by a number. A = (15 + 1) Lm (7 + 1) Lm = 112 Lm2. It was say that the spiral lines are in the center of the spiral area; but are also in the center of a spiral volume that has a thick equal to Lm. The transversal section f this volume is equal to Lm2 atoms; each atom in the transversal section correspond to a multimolecule, in which flow and are absorbed the heat particles.Has been consider that in the huge celestial bodies, that their interior zones increment their temperature due to the great pressure. In the stars this heat try to move toward the surface, by a conduction effect, following radial directions. In this condition our model gets some complications that will difficult our explanations; so, will be choose a body in which the transmitting of heat will be practically in a perpendicular direction, as in the case of a metallic plate. If the plate is heated in a uniform way in one side, the heat will tries to move to the opposite one, practically in a perpendicular direction to the surface of the plate. If the plate is heated in only one zone of its two surfaces, the heat will try to move also parallel to its surface. Here will be given a model of conduction of heat considering the advance movement of it in one direction, also taking in account the capacity of each electron of each atom of the plate to absorb and transmits heat to the adjacent electron of the adjacent atom
The hat absorbed by the higher temperature side of the plate will move toward the lower temperature will be consider an extensive and flat plate with a uniform thick. In all this process, the absorbed side of the plate; and afterward a part of it will be emitted by this side as a radiation or a convection fluid. Here energy by one side of the plate ought to be equal. to the conduction, the absorbed and the convection and radiated energy by the atoms of the plate. In the fore theme: Specific Heat (II) was seen that the atoms of a body or any substance absorb the half of the heat they receive from other atoms or from the exterior medium: It was say that the seven orbit electrons of the atoms transmit the heat in form of particles of corpuscles m
h to the adjacent atoms, in their vertices. A particle mh, formed by corpuscles, can produce heat. The value of mh is obtained by the difference of heat between the two sides of the plate-. The interior shell particles also can absorb the heat is introduced into them, and also can yield some excess heat.The conduction of heat can be produced in fusion material, in plasma, in solid , liquid and gaseous substances, etc. In any one of these states there are some variations that here will be omitted, in order not complicate the explanations; only will study the conduction of heat in a solid body (in a flat plate), with all its binary systems not ionized. The heat is transmitted from an atom to the adjacent one because there is a direct contact between them. In order the flow of heat will not be produced in an anarchic way, will consider it is flowing along multimolecules, that at the same time that are distributed parallel to the sides of the plate, covering an area (spiral volume) are in colineal contact with the adjacent spiral volume; also with the same thick of L
m In other themes has been explained that a multimolecule is formed by a chain of 2.5 x 106 atoms; so a transversal section of conduction, a multimolecule could be represented by one atom. In the cross section were are the multimolecule, in which is flowing the heat, transmitted by the electrons. Normal to the trajectory of the flowing particles mh, there is a surface with: Lm2 atoms; cross section of spiral volume. (Lm = length of a multimolecule expressed in atoms = 2.5 x 106; each atom correspond to the perpendicular section of a multimolecule. In our model we consider that the spiral surface is formed by: A = 2 x 7 x 8 = 112 multimolecules (see Fig. 1).Since the beginning of the theme was think that heat in form of particle of corpuscles m
h moves along multimolecules. In a flat and extensive plate of uniform thick , in a side of it there is higher temperature than in the other one. The heat will move from the higher temperature side toward the lower temperature, along the multimolecules there are in every spiral volume (see Fig. 1), that are parallel to the sides of the plate. Adjacent with the hotter side of the plate, there is the first spiral volume. At a perpendicular distance Lm = 2.5 x 106 atoms there is other spiral volume (the second one); both are united in the point (0) by a multimolecule that is perpendicular to them, with the values given before. At other similar distance, and collinear, toward the less hotter side of the plate there is a third spiral area. And so on till the less hotter side of the plate.Considering one spiral volume, in this the heat arrives to point (0) in volume V
1 = A1 Lm; next it moves a distance Lm to point (1); from here it moves a distance Lm to point (2); next it moves a distance 2 Lm to point (3); from here to point (4) moves 2 Lm; from (4) to (5) moves 3 Lm… from (13) to (14) moves 7 Lm. Then it enters to the pointed line spiral volume A2, we have moving from (14) to (13) a distance 6 Lm; from (13) to (12) 7 Lm; … from (2) to (1) and from (1) to /0) moves l Lm; completing a time of spiral. When the fore time of spiral has finished,. from point (0) of its spiral area, the heat moves perpendicular to point (0) of the forward spiral volume at a distance Lm. And so on, till arrives to the last spiral volume adjacent to the hotter side of the plate. To this movement between all the spiral volumes we will call: time of cycle = Σ times of spirals.With the fore information can obtain some numerical data that will help to structure our model. If the spiral volumes are spaced a perpendicular distance Lm, their influence volume will be a prism with a base equal to A and a height equal to Lm; to this volume will call: spiral volume; in the center of it ought to be a spiral area. We have seen that all the vertex point are marked with a number: 0, 1, 2, …. 14; the fore ones and those indicated with only one point have an equal influence volume of Lm3 atoms. We can imagine that the particles of heat mh can move during a time of jump (7 shell) into the forward electron that transmit the heat and this is yielded to the forward electron, and so on. Also could be consider other model (?) in which the heat advance from electron to electron at a slower velocity of several times of jump / electron, as does the sound.— To the spiral volume that is adjacent to the hotter side of the plate we will call: first spiral volume; in this there are 112 Lm from point (0) of A1, to point (0) of area A2.; of one spiral volume In our model will consider that in a time: 112 t
m = 112 x 2.8 x 19—5 = 3.136 x 10—3 Sec. = time of spiral, al the atoms of the first spiral volume absorb 100 % of the heat there is in front of the hotter area; in other time of spiral the fore heat moves to point (0) of the first spiral volume; and in a time: tm = 2.8 x 10—5 Sec. = time of spiral jump = tjs, the heat absorbed by the first spiral area has penetrated to the second spiral volumeIn the next table, in the first row are indicated with the number 1 to 8 the number of the spira volume that has the metallic plate. In the second row is indicated the quantity of heat that the calorific particle m
h yields in each speral in each speral volume, parting from one mh in the first colum: In the third row is indicated the quantity of heaat that the second calorific particle yields in the 8 spiral volume: And so on, in the other rows. Here is considered that when the first calorific particle mh begins to move in the second spiral volume, the second calorific particle mh begins to move in the first spiral volume; and when this begins to move in the second mh the third mh begins to move in the first spiral volume; and so on.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - --- - - - - --- ---- - - - - - --- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
½
¼
1/8
1/16
1/32
1/64
1/128
1
¼
¾
5/16
3/16
7/64
4/64
9/256
1
7/8
11/16
8/16
11/32
29/128
37/256
23/256
or to make a numerical example, it will be consider a copper plate of thick: = 9 L
m = 9 x 2.5 x 106 (2 x 1.13763 x 10—10) = 5.1193 x 10—3 m = 0.51193 cm; Lm = 2.5 x 106 (2 x 1.13763 x 10—10) = 5.688 x 10—4 m Spiral area: A = A1 + A2 = (14 Lm) (8 Lm) = 112 Lm2 = 112 (5.688 x 10—4)2 = 3.623 x 10—5 m2 Spiral volume = A Lm = 3.623 x 10—5 x 5.688 x 10—4 = = 2.061 x 10—8 m3 = 0.0206 cm3Density of copper: ΔCu = 8.9 gr./ cm3 Specific heat: cCu = 0.093 x 4.2 = 0.391 joule. The required heat for increment the temperature of 1 cm3 of copper 1o C: T = 8.9 x 0.391 = 3.48 joules / cm3. If the temperature in the hotter side of the plate is: T1 = 120o C, and in the less hotter si T2 = 20o C; then: m h = 100 x 3.48 x 0.0206 = 7.1688 joule
The first spiral volume gets the fore quantity of heat in a time of spiral t
s; and in other time ts, plus a time tm (time of spiral jump): ts + tjs, the quantity of heat mh will be in point (0) of the second spiral volume, in a time tm will yield its corresponding heat of this point mh / (2 x 112). next, in a time: tm will be in point (1), So that in all the second spiral volumes the heat particle m h has yield half of its mass, and has been reduced to: mh / 2; all these in a time of spire (ts)In the next time of jump of spire: t
js = tm the remaining particle of mh will be in point (0) of the third spiral volume; here will yield half of the remaining mass m / 4, also reducing to the fore value its mass; this process in a time: ts = 112 tm: In a time of jump of spire tjs = tm the remaining mass will be in point (0) of the four spiral volume here will reduce and yield to: mh /8. And so on till the 8 spiral volume (adjacent to the less hotter side) in which the reduced and yielded particles will be: mh / 128; completing a cycle.In the first row of the table given before, with the numbers: 1, 2, . . . 8 are indicated the spire volumes, from the first one, adjacent to the hotter side of the plate; to the 8 one, adjacent to the less hotter side. In the second row of the table are indicated the unitary quantity: of heat that in the first cycle was yielded by the particle mh in each one of the spiral volume. the first spiral volume absorbs mh; the second: mh / 2 . . . the 8 spiral volume: mh / 128.
It has been explained the yield of heat in the sample (the plate) in the first cycle; but after the first heat particle m
h was produced in the first spiral volume and had advanced to point (0) of the second spiral volume, all these in a time: 2 ( ts + tjs) = 226 tm = 113 tm of absorbing heat + 113 tm in yielding heat to the point (0) of the second spiral volume; the first spiral volume produces a second mh. So when the first mh is in point (0) of the third spiral volume; the second mh is in point (0) of the second spiral volume: That is, the second heat particle mh will be behind the first one a time of spiral (ts). -In the second row of the table are given the quantity of unitary heat that get all the spiral volumes in the first cycle, produced by the first heat particle mh . The second heat particle mh will yield to the second spiral volume some heat in a second cycle, as follow:Second cycle: In the first spiral volume is produced a second heat particle m
h proportional to (1), in the third row of the table In a time: (112 + 1) tm, the particle will be in point (0) of the second spiral volume, and will remain during a time ts in this spiral volume; etc… In the second spiral area there is: (1 / 2) mh from the first cycle, plus 1 mh of the second cycle: 0.5 (0.5 + 1) = 3 / 4 = to the deposited heat in the second spiral volume = remaining energy when the first cycle has finished.Remaining energy of the second spiral volume + Deposited energy of the first cycle; all divided by 2. [1+ 1 /2] 0.5 = 3 /4; [3/4+ 1 /4] 0.5 = 2/4; [2/4 + 1/8] 0.5 = 5/16; [5/16 + 1/16] 0.5 = 3/16; [3/16 + 1/32] 0.5 = 7/64; [7/64 + 1/64] 0.5 = 4/64; [4/64 + 1/128] 0.5 = 9/256
In a third cycle (4 spiral volume) we have: 1 + 3 /4] 0.5 = 7/8; [7/8 + 2/4] 0.5 = 11/16; [11/16 + 5/16] 0.5 = 8/16 . . .
In the second column the deposited heat varies: (2 – 1)/2 =1/2; (4 – 1)/4 =3 /4; (8 – 1)/8 = 7/8; (16 – 1)/16 = 15/16; (32 – 1)/32 =31/32; (128 – 1)/128 0.5 = 127/128.
In the seven cycle (8 spiral volume) we have: 1; [1 + 63/64] 0.5 = 127/128; [127/128 + 60/64] 0.5 = 247/256; . . . . . . . [1245/2048 + 793/2048] 0.5 =
1024/2048 As there are not other spiral volumes, the remaining heat escapes from the eight spiral volume, in accordance with the specific heat conditions. With bold numbers, from the first cycle to the seven one, we have in a diagonal position: 1/ 2 = 2/4 = 8/16 = 16/32 = 128/256 = 1024/2048. The deposited heat of (1/2) mh till the eight spiral area delay: 9 x 113 tm = 9 x 113 x 2.8 x10—5 = 0.0285 Sec. After this time the flux of heat on the plate, and that yields by it in the last spiral tends to gets a unitary value equal to (1). the flux ceases, the plate will try to get a temperature of: (100o + 20o) 0.5 = 60o C ; 50o C and finally 20o C
Monterrey, México, May /2005; February / 07 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
HOW ARE FORMED THE ATOMS (I) (checked)
Since 40 years ago, when my economic conditions permitted me to investigate in the physics, I studied in detail the investigation work of physics of my father, and with this I confirmed he was right in consider that the relativity theory was based in wrong concepts. I had the opportunity to read some books he had, and other ones, specially those related with the structure of the atoms; because same as my father I consider that the essence of the Universe was produced by the atoms. Reading how was the radiation of the black bodies, and how could move the orbital electrons around the nucleus of an atom, in form of waves, I conceived my model of the polygonal orbits, of the electrons moving around their nuclei. My first idea was that a quantity of electrons is moving around a single nucleus. This could be possible because the existence of a field of forces around the nucleus. This field ought to be similar in many aspects, as the one imagined by Newton and Kepler, and afterward by Maxwell and Einstein, that consider that it could be produced from the most elemental particles in any given instant
In my investigation work I concluded that the fore fields are not very much correct; that an elementary particle only could produce lineal radiations forces in a given instant. Many elementary particles, forming a bigger one, in a given instant, can produce many lineal radiations forces in a given instant; being this radiation distributed around a sphere, and acting in a similar way as the fields of forces. A single elementary particle, in many given instants can radiate in all directions many lineal radiations, covering practically the same space and effects than a field of forces.. To the fields conceived since the Newton epoch, and accepted since then, have been named: fields of forces; here will not change the name to them. But to our model of fields we have conceived will call:
induced fields With the fore ideas and others will be mentioned afterward, was possible to improve my model of polygonal orbits. In the epoch mentioned at the beginning of this theme I had the opportunity to have interchange of ideas with a very much competent and very much accessible physicist: Rodolfo Castillo Bahena; he was director of the Faculty of Physics in the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. My relation with him was very much benefic to me. I remember that in one occasion he said to me that the investigator that will give a real good model of atom, immediately will win a Nobel Prize. Then I thought that with my original model of polygonal orbits, mentioned before could be obtained such model, only were required to give more details and explanations. With such model of atom could be explained all the phenomena of the Universe; because the Universe as a whole, is formed with atoms an empty space; all the elementary particles are produced by the atoms..Before continue explaining how are formed the atoms, and of course all the Universe, will try to imagine how was formed the Universe. Of course this is not possible. If we pretend that in many millions of years was verify this; with other many millions of years before, or with infinite many millions of years before, it is not possible to arrive to the mentioned beginning: All right; in a space of the Universe it is possible to imagine a part of it that has not an evolution as we know it is now. In this space of the Universe can imagine is only an immense cloud of microcorpuscles, as those of gravity, moving at light velocity (with their inherent kinetic energy), with respect to a given point. After some change of conditions of space, time, density, etc. in the mentioned space a great proportion of the gravity microcorpuscles unite forming corpuscles as those of light. Afterward a great proportion of the corpuscles unite forming electrons, protons, neutrons; so that it is possible these unite forming hydrogen atoms, and also all the atoms, as will be understand better afterward In my investigation activity I arrived to the conclusion that so small particles, as the gravity microcorpuscles and the light corpuscles, under certain conditions we ignore (I think that for ever) move at light velocity. The mass of such particles and their velocity have a kinetic energy; and this energy could be transmitted to bigger particles, and because this, the orbital electrons move around the nucleus of an atom at a determine velocity (v
n) with its corresponding kinetic energy. All the energy of the atoms produce all the forces of the Universe, as those that have the stars, and all the phenomena of the Universe. And with this simple ideas is explained by one side the concept of mass, and by other complete independent one, the concept of energy. In other themes of this protocol is explained how a propeller particle (m⊥n ), formed by corpuscles as those of light, transmits it energy (kinetic one) to the orbital electron, making it to deflect in a vertex of its polygonal orbit. This could be by a series of reflection effects; or by one reflection effect with a longer time of the reflection action; or by any other reason…We have not a clear idea why the corpuscles, as those of light, and the microcorpuscles of gravity have the mentioned kinetic energy. To this energy we will call: inherent energy. The just mentioned particles can transmit their inherent energy to other particles more bigger, as the electrons, protons, etc. in different ways. It is well known that the atoms affected by inherent energy can produce different kinds of energy, from mechanical, chemical, to atomic ones. With all say before are clear many facts, so we are not only able to understand many relations between the behavior of the macroscopic bodies and the atomic ones; but we are able to improve in a very much significant way our model of the polygonal orbits.The idea that have the modernist physicists is that all the atoms are formed by a given quantity of orbital electrons and one unitary nucleus; also they do not have a clear idea how act the positive and the negative particles; they consider that if it is tried to unite two particles with the same kind of charge, there will be rejection between them. This is because they consider that the electrons and the protons are smooth spheres with uniform surface; in such way that the attraction or rejection forces are produced in the same way in any place of their surface. As the nucleus of an atom if formed by protons and neutrons, it was not be possible for them to obtain a unitary model of nucleus with the same sigh of charge, so they were forced to invent the strong forces;. But this solution only made more complex the structure of the atom and of all physics.
For us that are supporter of mechanophysics, the fore mentioned model resulted completely unsatisfactory; so was obtained the model of the binary systems. As have been explained in other themes of this protocol, with the model of the binary systems the nucleus of the atom is not formed by a unitary particle, but as many particles, as orbital electrons has the atom: This means, that each binary system is formed by an orbital electron as negative particle, and a positive particle formed by a proton; or by a proton and one, or two neutrons. The negative (electron) and the positive particle that form the binary system are spaced one from each other a distance approximate to a radius of an atomic shell. Both particles rotate around a point (center of the nucleus). The orbital electron of the seven shell has, in accordance with our model, a normal velocity of: v
7 = 308,570 m./ Sec; and the positive particle (proton)has a velocity: v+7 = 4 x 308,570 / 1,836 = 672.266 m./ Sec.. If the two mentioned particles of a binary system do not unite, in spite they have opposite electric charges is because there is an equilibrium between the kinetic energy (due to inherent energy…) that has the orbital electron trying to move away in a perpendicular direction from the positive particle; and the attraction force that exist between both particles of the binary system. Similar thing could be say of the positive particle with respect to the orbital electron. To explain with all details all these effects is a long way. Here only will give some direct ideas. In other themes seen in this protocol have been see the binary systems, so, we have some data from they.An orbital electron moving in the seven shell has a kinetic energy equal to: K
e = 0.5 me v72 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 (3.0857 x 105)2 = 4.3366 x 10—20 joule Mass of a corpuscle: mc = 1.47236 x 10—50 Kg. We can consider the fore energy equal to the inherent energy of the electron. With this energy the electron moves away from the positive particle in a perpendicular direction. The inherent or kinetic energy of the electron could be produced by (n) active corpuscles, as those of light, moving at light velocity, so: Kinetic energy of a corpuscle in a propeller fluid: Ke = 0.5 mc c2 = 0.5 x 1.47236 x 10—50 (3 x 108)2 = 6.62562 x 10—34 joule = one quantumOf the binary systems seen in other themes, have been study with more detail the orbits of the electrons, not so those of the positive particles (the nushells). For to have a more complete model of binary systems, it is require to have more details of both particles of the binary systems. It is suppose these two particles have an spherical form, as is consider in modern physics. But we consider that not all the surface is smooth, as a billiard ball. There is one side were each particle can absorb or emit propeller particles; in other themes have been see this: Here will give a special name to this side: propen side. In the opposite side there is other variation of the smooth sphere, also in accordance with our model; to this other side we will call: ionopen side; in this side, is supposed are produced the ionization effects; here are absorbed the inductive radiations and are emitted the ionization radiations. Both mentioned sides are spaced along a distance equal to the diameter of the particles (positive or negative one) of the binary system: This diameter is as a hollow space, as a tube, along which can move the propeller particles.
In modern physics is consider that when two protons are put together, they are rejected. But this is not enough for they get rejected, also it is required that their propen sides get oriented in such way they will be in front one with each other. As was say some paragraphs before. For the solution gave by the modernist physicists of a unitary nucleus, was consider the existence of the strong forces. With our model of the binary systems, the proton or the positive particles of the nucleus are always oriented to its orbital electrons with more energy, so they do not have chance to move orienting their propen sides, to get them in front one to the other.
Till now we have accepted our original model of binary system with an orbital electron of the seven shell with radius equal to that of the atom; and with the first orbit of the positive particle the smaller possible, but with enough space for two positive particles to move freely in the first nushell. By preference we have study the structure of an atom considering the seven shell. In the numerical examples were determine the orbital velocities of the electron and of the proton; with them is determine their energies of attraction of both particles in the binary systems. The first idea could get the readers is that the two particles of the binary systems are attracted in a similar way, for instance, as the Earth and the Moon, with equal and opposite forces. Really in our model are not two particles, but three; there is a propeller article (m
l), whose mass if formed by corpuscles as those of light, so, its inherent energy is 100 % effective, that is, all its mass can move at light velocity by itself. In a time of deflection the propeller particle, that has arrived to the propen side with a velocity (c ), for instance, to the orbital electron; begins with this velocity from the propen side toward the ionopen side along the hollowed diameter; in this trajectory its velocity diminishes to zero because there is an interchange of inherent energy with the orbital electron that is deflected From the ionopen side the propeller particle return toward the propen side from zero velocity to (c) velocity when arrives to the propen side; from here the propeller particle jumps toward the ptopen side of the positive particle with its velocity (c); were is repeated a similar cycle of movement as that in the electron, producing also the interchange of inherent energy in its trajectory along the hollow diameter.. These trajectories, of course are produced in a time of deflection (t>), equal in both particles The interchange of energy is the required for to deflect the trajectory of the positive particle (the proton) in accordance with the radius of its nushell. In order to make more illustrative the problem, and also for to determine a law of interchange of inherent energy will be made the following numerical example.In many other examples have been obtained the deflection velocity (radial velocity) of the negative particle (electron). v
^7 = 69,098 m./ Sec..; the deflection angle: α7 = 360o /28 = 12o.857 K^+7 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 x 69,0982 = 2.1746 x 10—21 joule.The orbital velocity of the proton: v
+7 = 672.21 m./ Sec. Its radial velocity: v^+ = 69,098 x 672.21 / 308,570 = 150.54 m./ Sec. K^+ = 0.5 m+ v^+2 = 0.5 x 1.6725 x 10—27 x 150.542 = 1.896 x 10—23 joule K^+7 / K+ = 2.1746 x 10—21 / 1.896 x 19—23 = 114.7If the (m
p) acted in the same way in the positive particle than in the negative one: why the attraction forces K^+7 and K^+ are so different? With the following law will be explained why. 1.896 x 10—23 x 1.836 / 42 = 2.1756 x 10--21 = K^+7Law of interchange of an inherent energy: The interchange of inherent energy is 4 times more effective or intense in the positive charges than in the negative ones, and is proportional to the quantity of inherent energy that has the propeller particle (mp) divided by the active inherent energy that has the affected particle (in this case the proton).
Monterrey, Mécico, April, 2004 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
HOW ARE FORMED THE ATOMS (II) (corrected theme) Å-------pendiente
Before to explain how are formed the atoms, we need to have an idea of the structure of the atomic particles, that is, of the electrons, protons, neutrons. The word atom in the ancient Greece meant a unitary and indestructible particle; now we know this is not correct; neither the atomic particles can be consider as the mentioned particles. In an objective physics are considered much smaller particles as the corpuscles of light and the microcorpuscles of gravity. If in an accelerator of particles, for instance, an electron can wear out, we can imagine it is formed by smaller particles, as the corpuscles. Are ignored some characteristics of the corpuscles; in some conditions they are as inert particles; in other conditions can move at light velocity. In accordance with this can imagine atomic particles, as the electrons formed by inert corpuscles. Considering the atomic particles as stable ones, formed by a quantity of corpuscles. If it is wanted to increment the fix quantity, afterward, the excess is ejected. If by some way is reduced the fixed quantity into certain limits each electron gets in a unstable state, as could be seen in some conditions. If the reduction is incremented , not only gets in a unstable state , but will not acts as an electron.
In the binary systems, although the electron is the smaller particle, is the most active one; in a more direct way, with it will be define the behavior of such system and of the atom; so, by preference will study its structure and behavior. Beside the inert corpuscles that form its structure with a mass: m
e = 9.1091 x 10—31 Kg, the stable electron has, in accordance with our model some free corpuscles whose inherent energy is equal to: 13.5 eV., part of these corpuscles are employed in produce the orbital velocity of the electron (kinetic energy: 0.5 me vn2); the other part is stored into the electron of the binary system) we call this energy: stored energyIn the fore paragraph was considered the stored energy is in all the electrons; but beside the fore energy, some electrons can have more energy corpuscles , as will be seen forward. In this theme has try to define the structure of an atom. By its self is formed by a given quantity of binary systems, being each binary system formed by a positive and a negative particle. Both type of particles are essential in the structure of the binary systems; also can be consider the existence of other particle that we call: propeller particle. In other themes have been explained the function of these particles with more details. While more small is a particle in the structure of an atom, more simple is its structure. Omitting a series of considerations; with the orbital electrons will be able to define in an elementary way the structure and behavior of the atom, as appreciated in the numerical examples; and all these will be in function of all the binary systems that has an atom. Knowing the behavior of the electron, it is easier to deduce the behavior of the other parts of the binary system and of the atom With respect to the binary systems, here have mentioned the stored energy that have all the electrons
(13.6 eV.). In our model have been consider the binary systems corresponding to the seven shell; they are formed by molecable electrons, they also have the same corpuscles that produce the stored energy, and in our model it is consider that have in a permanent way also a quantity of corpuscles equivalent to to the energy of ionization, and that they are excited when are affected by a field (microcorpuscles) of ionization. The proportion of such corpuscles is bigger in one binary system than in the other. One of the two binary systems of the seven shell can gets ionized when is affected by an ionizer medium, to this we will call: first binary system; the other gets partially ionized, to this we will call: second binary system; as will be seen forward in the numerical examples. The first binary system that is formed in a shell, is suppose that receives more corpuscles, and with more velocity than the other ones Some atoms, as the © has two molecable electrons in the six shell; we suppose they have some energy of ionization; by now it is not necessary to study this. There is other energy we call: deposited energy that also is absorbed by the first and second binary systems of the seven shell, and that we consider is yielded by the other binary systems. We suppose that the ionization energy corpuscles exist in the binary systems of the seven shell of all the atoms, in a permanent way, forming a part of the structure of it, and that are manifested when each atom is affected by the ionizer medium.
In our models of molecules and multimolecules an electron jumps from an atom to the adjacent one every time of jump: t
j = 1.12 x 10—11 Sec. With this we conclude that for to produce an ionization (in the seven orbit) it is required the fore time; this is one condition. After was made the model of electric current was consider that the current electron could jumps from a multimolecule to the adjacent one, producing a big ionization; but when all the values of the electric current were balanced, the required ionization was reduced in a signify way Afterward we study better the model. was seen that the fore ionization only could be produced if the current electron moves several times of jump (tj) around each atom of the multimolecule. For to solve this problem we have two ways: One considering that the current electron moves several times of jump only in the last atom of the multimolecule, before it jumps to the adjacent multimolecule. The other solution is considering that the atoms of the multimolecules get more corpuscles than the corresponding to the stored energy of an isolate atom, so they needed less energy to get ionized.. This solution is the correct one because does not affect the times in which are produced the different effects… Forward will be seen that the electron of binary system (seven shell) can gets more independent corpuscles than the stored ones; for instance, when it is affected by an ionization medium. These corpuscles can be obtained because the other binary systems of the atom yield them to such binary system. Also it is possible that these extra corpuscles could be formed at expense of the same structure of the electron of the binary system, when this is affected by the ionization effect. By now it does not matter how they are formed, only matter that they exist This extra corpuscles can produce an extra energy in the electron that we will call: deposited energy. and that is manifested when the ionization is produced. All these could be understand better in the numerical examples.The energy of ionization is reduced in a perceptible way in the electric current electrons, as was seen in the fore paragraph see the theme: A Model of Electric Current and its Application to Medicine. If the atoms of an electric conductor have more deposited energy (deposited corpuscles) than the normal one (or stored energy), without growing their temperature, this poses some interesting problems in physics and in biology. As the binary system is formed by a positive particle and a negative one (electron), this last one, when acts in the molecules and in the multimolecules, jumps from a binary system of an atom to the adjacent atom, every time o jump.
A stable atom can gets unstable if is affected by an ionization medium. Because this can imagine that the ionization medium emits corpuscles that are absorbed by the electron of the binary system is going to be ionized. We rather think that the ionizer medium emits a field of microcorpuscles that affect the electron, in such way that the other binary systems of the atom, corresponding to shells smaller than the seven one, contribute to increment the corpuscles forming the deposited energy; this could be done with corpuscles emitted by the other binary systems. In our model we will see here, the only thing that interest us, by now, is to know the quantity of deposited energy; and the potential of ionization; this last one will be obtained with the values given by the tables. Forward will be given a formula, with a mathematical criterion for to determine the structure of the atoms, based in their ionization potential and of the radius of the atoms.
When an atom is affected by a difference of potential, can get ionized, this happens in one of the two binary systems of the seven shell. In our models we will see here, also there are some condition to produce such ionization; one of them is that the axis of the binary system is going to be ionized, be oriented in the same direction in which is the ionizer medium with respect to the atom; that is, that the electron will be in front (see propen side forward) of the ionizer medium in the instant that the ionization begins. This ionization effect continues acting in the electron in every vertex of its orbits during a time of jump, and then the electron jumps out from the binary system that is ionized.
In other themes of this work have been given the structure of an atom, formed by binary systems; corresponding each binary system to an orbital electron. We have seen that each binary system is formed by the negative particle (the orbital electron) and by one positive particle, that could be a proton, or a proton plus one or two neutrons, that are integrated, forming a single spherical particle. Both particles have a side in which moves (in or out) the propeller particle. to this side we denominate: propen side In the opposite place of the particle there is other side that we call: ionopen side; for the binary system get ionized this last side (or the other?…) must be in front of the ionizer system, Both sides of a particle of a binary system are united by a diameter; this diameter has the form of a hollow space, as a circular tube.
The way are united the two particles of the binary systems, has been explained in other themes. Both particles are united due to the propeller particle (in accordance with a model); this particle moves into any one of the two particles of the binary system, from the propen side toward the ionopen side, and from this to the propen side, interchanging its inherent energy with the affected particle of the binary system, in such way that after the fore movement, the propeller particle moves toward the other particle, repeating a similar movement and effect in it; so that there is an equilibrated effect between the fore attraction and the tendency of both particles of the binary system to separate due to their orbital velocity; all these as have been explained in detail in other themes. For produce the fore mentioned effects, both particles of the binary system must be oriented with their propen sides one in front of the other one, all time. With respect to the atom, in this way there is no rejection forces between the positive particles of all the binary systems that form the nucleus of the atom; this because the only way that two particles with equal charges are not rejected would be if they can not have their propen siides in front, one to each other.. In modern physics has been consider that the nucleus of an atom is a unitary particle formed by positive particles; between them there are electromagnetic forces that try to reject them; but also there are strong forces that oppose such rejection… We do not accept this model by obvious reasons. In our model we do not have the problems of rejection between the positive particles, by the reason given before; but this is not an obstacle to consider that between a binary system and the other ones of one atom, could exist an interchange of energy, as will be explained with our models of the different atoms
At the same time that one of the two binary systems of the seven shell gets incremented (by corpuscles) for to be ionized, the other (the second) binary system also receives some ionization effect, but in less quantity than the first one, as will be seen in the numerical examples. In the fore paragraphs we have talked of ionization effects and of the size of the atoms, considering this two effects we will be able to obtain a structure of the atoms in an elementary and approximate way, that will permit us to see them in a more fundamental form, with the help of classical physics and the mechanophysics. Next will be given some considerations, that at the same time that harmonize with the structure of the atoms will harmonize with our model, that will be expressed with a mathematical formula.
Here will consider that if the most external orbit (seven shell) of the atom grows, the time of orbit does not change. This means that the velocity of the orbital electron grows in the same proportion than the radius of the orbit. If the velocity of the orbital electron grows, its kinetic energy will grows in a proportion equal to the square of such velocity. Similar considerations could be made when the orbital electrons move in the subshell orbits.; in the (s) and (p) levels there is an increment in their velocity; in the (d) and (f) levels there is a decrement in their velocities .. (?). With a change of temperature also there is a change of velocity and energy in the orbital electron… In order to understand better the explanations, will consider that in the first row of the periodic table there are two atoms (H and He) with binary systems only in the seven shell. The first atom (H) is designed by: N = 1; and the last atom (He) is designed by: N = 2.
In the second row ( six shell atoms) the first atom (Li) is designed by: N = 3; and the last atom of the row (Ne) is designed by: N = 10; if it is consider the (c) atom, could be designed by: N = 6. In the third row (or 5 shell atoms) atom (Na) is designed by: N = 11, (Al) is designed by: N = 13, . In the four row (or four shell atoms) (K) is designed by: N = 19; (Kr) is designed by: N = 36, and so on. In the table at the end of this theme can be appreciate the following:
The dimension of the atoms (diameter, surface, volume) can be obtained with the table of the radiuses of the atoms; in this table could be appreciated how the radiuses vary: In the first column in the left side the radius grow from the (H) atom toward the (C
s) one (in the Fr atom is not indicated any value): Similar thing happens with the other columns, except in that extreme right one, in which are not indicated such dimensions. With respect to the resistance of ionization; this by preference diminishes from the upper atoms toward the lower ones in most of the columns. But the fore variations are not produced in a uniform way: In a particle as perfect as ought to be the atoms could not be logic such variations. Because this, we conclude that both effects (the dimensional and the ionization one) are not independents, but can considered simultaneously and correlated one with each other. In this way the effects of both, are more uniform and more in accordance with the atomic number of each effect.About 40 years ago I conceived the model of the polygonal orbit atoms, with this I was forced to consider the velocity of the orbital electrons; in the first orbit the velocity was equal to 2,160 Kms./ Sec. With this velocity the electron got a kinetic energy equivalent to 13.3 eV.; that was the energy required for the orbital electron to jump from the seven orbit (shell) to the first one. In the seven orbit the kinetic energy of the orbital electron was consider: v
7 = 2,160 / 7 = 308.57 Kms./ Sec., that is equivalent to an energy equal to: K7 = 13.3 / 72 = 0.27 ≈ 0.3 eV. In our model of polygonal orbit were forced to consider the seven orbit (7 shell) with 28 sides. Then (not now) it was consider that the time of vertex could vary in the same proportion than the fundamental radius did; since then was given to the radius of the atoms an average a value: r F = 1.13763 x 10.10 m.Here will be consider that all the electrons dispose of an energy equivalent to 13.6 eV.: A seven orbit electron employs 0.27 ≈ 0.3 eV. of the fore energy for to move at: 308.57 Kms./ Sec, and this and the rest of such energy is stored one. From the six to the second shell the binary systems have the same stored energy, so can contribute (in accordance with our model) with part of these energy to increment the deposited energy of the binary systems that are going to be ionized (seven orbit ones), in a complete way the first binary system and in less magnitude to the second binary systems. In the first binary systems all the stored energy of it is employed in produce its velocity: v
1 = 2160 Kms./ Sec. This binary system does not contribute to increment the deposited energy of the binary system that is going to be ionized. Here it is pertinent to point out that all atoms (except the H one) have two orbital electrons in the seven shell; one that can be ionized (first binary system) and the other (second binary system) that can receive some deposited energy (±) in this process, although in a smaller quantity.Considering that the times of vertex are a constant value in all the atoms, as was proved in the theme: Unified Fields, we will obtain a simplified formula of ionization; with this formula, not only will be able to explain how are formed the atoms, but also will be able to understand many properties of them. The numerical results will be better explanations that all the words we use. When the radius of an atom grows, the velocity of the seven orbit electron will grows in the same proportion and the kinetic energy of such electron will grows in a proportion equal to the square of such velocity. The increments or decrements will be given considering a unitary value with respect to the fundamental radius r
F. As was say before, in an electron there is a stored energy equal to 13.6 eV. A part of the fore energy is employed in giving the orbital velocity to the electron. Considering the fundamental radius, the normal or fundamental kinetic energy of the orbital electron is as follow: Seven shell: K7 = 13.6 / 72 = 0.278 eV. Sixth shell: K6 = 13.6 / 62 = 0.378 eV. K5 = 13.6 / 52 = 0.544 eV. K4 = 13.6 / 42 = 0.85 eV. K3 = 13.6 / 32 = 1.511 eV. K2 = 13.6 / 22 =3.4 eV: In the first shell all its stored energy is employed in moving the electron in such orbit.We have say that any electron has a total stored energy of 13.6 eV; of this energy, a binary system corresponding to the seven shell employs K
7 energy in moving the electron in the seven orbit at a velocity v7, and the rest of the energy: 13.6 - K7 = K7s = stored energy that remains in the electron. Beside the fore energy the seven orbit binary system has other energy that contribute to produces an ionization the electron; this is the deposited energy (energy given by the other binary systems) plus the ionization one, both are equivalent to 13.6 eV. It is supposed that the deposited energy is produced by some binary systems, as have been explained; nevertheless, yet we are not sure if the stored energy contribute in some way to this. The energy that receive the first and the second binary systems when are ionized is called: deposited energy that yield the other binary systems of the atom, when is ready to be ionized, they are: K7 = 13.6 / 72 = 0.278 eV. Sixth shell: K6 = 13.6 / 62 = 0.378 eV. K5 = 13.6 / 52 = 0.544 eV.; K4 = 13.6 / 42 = 0.85 eV. K3 = 13.6 / 32 = 1.511 eV. K2 = 13.6 / 22 =3.4 eV eV.; K2d = 13.6 -3.4 = 10.2The orbital electrons not only move in the 7 shells of the atoms; but also they move in subshells, whose radiuses are: r
n![]()
In the table of ionization can be appreciated that in the extreme right column the ionization is bigger than 13.6 eV .in the atoms: He, Ne, Ar, and Kr. In the rows in which are the fore mentioned last three atoms, the value of ionization grows in an average way from the extreme left atom toward the extreme right atom. When the ionization of the atoms is bigger than 13.6 eV, one binary system can get ionized and the other also increments its deposited energy, but in a smaller quantity. In a row, of the fore mentioned, from the left atom toward the extreme right atom, in an average way the ionization grows as will be seen forward.
In the (Xe) atom the ionization is: i = 12.1 eV., in the (Rn) atom is: i = 10.7 eV. This means that the second binary system decrements its stored energy when the first binary system is reaching its ionization energy; but this energy, by one side grows in accordance with the ionizer medium, and by other side diminish in accordance with the capacity of the atom to gets deposited energy. This means that as the amu of the atom grows, its capacity to gets deposited energy diminish; in this way can be explained that could not be atoms with higher amu = 102. As have been explained, the binary system that is going to be ionized of an atom, gets deposited energy of all the other binary system of the atom, in a proportion equal to their stored energy they have, a binary systems of the first shell does not have free stored energy because it is employed all this energy in moving the electron at a velocity: v
1 = 2,160 Kms./ Sec.Next will be given the proportion of stored potential obtained by each binary system of each complete shell: Seven shell, in this the binary system (second one), that is partially ionized contributes with a proportion equal to: (7 / 7)
2. In the sixth shell, each binary system contribute with a proportion equal to: (6 / 7)2. All the binary systems corresponding to the sixth shell contribute with a proportion equal to: (6 / 7)2 x 8. In the fifth shell all the binary systems corresponding to this shell contribute with a proportion equal to: (5 / 7)2 x 8. In the third shell = 5 row: (3 / 7)2 x 18 In the second shell (6 row) the proportional contribution is: (2 / 7)2 x 32 (there are 32 atoms in the 6 row). It has been say that all the binary systems (minus , that,t hat is going to be ionized) contribute to produce the deposited potential. This potential will be equal to the sum of all the binary systems that contribute divided by 13.6 (N – 1), and multiplied by (Kd)2The atoms have 7 shell, but not all are occupied by binary system in all the atoms; such shells are denominated by the numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6. 7. But not all the orbital electrons move exactly in the whole number shell mentioned before: Most of them move in orbits (subshells) with radiuses little bed bigger (s, p, levels), or little bed smaller (f, d, levels) (?)
Next will be determine the simplified formula of ionization, with all say before 13.6 + i
2´ = i + A·B·C . . . . (I)
( ---- A ---) (----------- B -------------------) (-------------------------C ----------------à
13.6 +i2´ = i + (rN / rF)2 [KNd2 / 13.6 (N - !) ] [(7´/ 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8´ + (5 / 7)2 8´´ + (4 / 7)2 18´ ------- -------------------------------)
+ (3/7)2 18´´ + (2 /7)2 32´] . . . (I)
In the ionization of an atom, all the binary systems work in some way. In our model, the two binary systems of the seven shell are those that are affected in a direct way by the ionizer medium; one that we will call: first binary system will gets from the other binary systems the energy required for gets ionized; and the other we will call: second binary system will gets a fraction of ionization. The first binary system (7 shell) gets an energy of 13.6 eV. (equal to the ionizer energy plus the deposited one) The second binary system will take the other fraction of the ionization, that is represented by: i2´
The effect produced in both binary systems, is due in first place to the potential of ionization, represented by: (i) , this is the first value (after the sign =) of the second term of formula (I); this term is called: potential of ionization (i). When the fore potential acts in the electron, it is going to be ionized. Also act the other binary systems producing, in accordance with the term: A·B·C, the deposited energy in the first and second binary systems..
(A), this term is is equal to: (r
N / rF)2; rN = radius of the atom; rF = fundamental radius = 1.13763 μ.. Have been explained in other part of these theme that the energy that has the seven orbit electron grows proportional to the second power of the increment of its radius.this term is equal to: K
the terms into the angular parenthesis: (n/7)
In this theme has been talked of a fundamental radius of the atoms: r
F; with this radius the orbital electron (7 shell) moves at a velocity: v7 = 2160 / 7 = 308.57 Kms./ Sec.: If the atom has a radius different than the fundamental, the velocity of the electron and its kinetic energy varies has have been explained(Be ) atom. i = 9.3 eV; r
N = 0.89 μ; N = 4 ; M = 6 shell; K6d = 13.2 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (0.89 / 1.13763 )2 = 0.7822 = 0.612 B = K6d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 13,22 / 13.6 (4 - 1) = 4.271 8´ = 2; 8” = 18´ = 18” = 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 x 2 + 0 ] = 1 + 1.469 = 2.469 Formula (I): i1 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 9.3 + 0.612 x 4.271 x 2.469 = 9.3 + 6.454 = 15.754(C) atom. i = 11.3 eV; r
N = 0.77 μ; N = 6 ; M = 6 shell; K6d = 13.2 eV.13.6 + i
2´ = 11.3 + 0.458 x 2.562 x 3.939 = 11.3 + 4.622 = 15.922 The value: 4.522 eV. = to the absorption (deposited energy) that get the first and second binary systems. By now we do not know if the molecable electrons that are in the six shell of the (C) atom receive deposited energy of the other binary systems, although in our model we do not consider this now.(N) atom.
i = 14.5 eV; rN = 0.74 μ; N = 7 ; M = 6 shell; K6d = 13.2 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (0.74 / 1.13763)2 = 0.6502 = 0.423 B = KMd2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 13.22 / 13.6 (7 - 1) = 2.135 8´ = 5 8” = 18´ = 18” = 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 5 + 0 ] = 4.673 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ 1 = 4.5 + 0.423 x 2.135 x 4.673 = 14.5 + 4.220 = 18.720
(Na) atom. i = 5.1 eV; r
N = 1.57 μ; N = 11 ; M = 5 shell; K5d = 13.1 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (1.57 / 1.13763)2 = 1.3802 = 1.905 B = K5d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 13.12 / 13.6 (11 - 1) = 1.262 8´ = 8; 8” = 1; 18´ = 18” = 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8´ + (5 / 7)2 1 + 0] = 7.388 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ 5.1 + 1.905 x 1.262 x 7.388 = 5.1 + 17.79 = 22.89
(K) atom. i = 4.3 eV; r
N = 2.03 μ; N = 19 ; M = 4 shell; K4d = 12.75 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (2.03 / 1.13763)2 = 17842 = 3.184 B = K4d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 12.752 / 13.6 ( 19 - 1) = 0.664 8´ = 8” = 8; 18´ = 1; 18” = 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8 + (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 1 + 0´] = 11.287 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ 1 + 4.3 + 3.184 x 0.664 x 11.287 = 4.3 + 23.860 = 28.161Here: i
2´ = 28.161 – 13.6 = 14.56 eV. We expected i2 would be smaller than 13.6 eV. The interpretation we give to this is that when is produced the ionization effect, the second binary system of the seven shell, moves to a subshell smaller than the seven one; so its potential of ionization grows; forward, in the atom of copper will be seen with more detail this.(Cu) atom. i = 7.7 eV; r
N = 1.17 μ; N = 29 ; M = 4 shell; K4d = 12.75 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (1.17 / 1.13763)2 = 1.0282 = 1.058 B = K4d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 12.75 2 / 13.6 (29 - 1) = 0.427 8´ 8” = 8; 18´ = 11; 18” = 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8 + (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 11+ 0] = 14.552 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 7.7 + 1.058 x 0.427 x 14.552 = 7.7 + 6.574 =14.274We can find a very much important fact if we see the theme: A Model of Electric Current and its Application to Medicine, in which is given a numerical example of electrical conductor of copper wire. A copper atom gets ionized when it is applied a potential of 7.7 eV.; because this, can suppose that for produce an electric current it is required to apply the fore mentioned difference of potential; nevertheless, in such example with a difference of potential equal to: i
k = 0.192 eV is produced an electric current. The interpretation given to this is that the second binary system of the seven shell, contribute whit an energy of: 7.7 – 0.192 = 7.508 eV. (absorbed by the first binary system) when is produced the difference of potential required for produce the electric current. So, will have that for an electric current will vary some values: i2´ = 13.6 + 7.508 = 21.11 eV; i = 0.192 eV; formula (1) will be transformed: 13.6 + i2´ = 0.192 + A B C(Rb) atom. i = 4.2 eV; r
N = 2.16 μ; N = 37 ; M = 3 shell; K3d = 12.1 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (2.16 / 1.13763)2 = 1.8992 = 3.605 B = K3d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 12.1 2 / 13.6 (37 - 1) = 0.299 8´ = 8” = 8; 18´ = 18; 18” = 1; 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8 + (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 18 + (3 / 7)2 1 + 0] = 17.022 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 4.2 + 3.605 x 0.299 x 17.022 = 4.2 + 18.348 = 22.548; i2´ = 8.95
(Sr) atom. i = 5.7 eV; r
N = 1.91 μ; N = 38 ; M = 3 shell; K3d = 12.1 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = (1.91 / 1.13763)2 = 1.6792 = 2.819 B = K3d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 12.12 / 13.6 (38 - 1) = 0.291 8´ = 8” = 8; 18´ = 18; 18” = 2; 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8+ (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 1´ + (3 / 7)2 2 + 0] = 17.205 ¨Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 5.7 + 2.819 x 0.291 x 17.205 = 5.7 + 14.114 = 19.814
Cs) atom. i = 3.9 eV; r
N = 2.35 μ; N = 55 ; M = 2 shell; K2d = 10.2 eV. A = (rN / rF)2 = ( 2.35 / 1.13763)2 = 2.0662 = 4.267 B = KMd2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 10.2 2 / 13.6 (55 - 1) = 0.142 8´ = 8; = 8; 18´ = 18” = 18; 32´ = 0 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8 + (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 18 + (3 / 7)2 18 + (2 / 7)2 1] = 20.226 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 3.9 + 4.267 x 0.142 x 20.226 = 3.9 +12.255 = 16.155(Hg) atom. i = 10.4 eV; r
N = 1.44 μ; N = 80 ; M = 2 shell; K2d = 10.2 eV A = (rN / rF)2 = (1.44 / 1.13763)2 = 1.2662 = 1.602 B = K2d2 / 13.6 (N – 1) = 10.22 / 13.6 (80 - 1) = 0.0968 8´ = 8” = 8;; 18´ = 18” = 18; 32´ = 26 C = [ (7 / 7)2 + (6 / 7)2 8 + (5 / 7)2 8 + (4 / 7)2 18 + (3 / 7)2 18 + (2 / 7)2 26] = 22.266 Formula (I): i´ 1 + i´2 = i + A·B·C = 13.6 + i´2 = i + A·B·C 13.6 + i2´ = 10.4 + 1.602 x 0.0968 x 22.266 = 10.4 + 3.453 = 13.73 ≈ 13.853Monterrey, Mexico, February 2005
Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
Un corto de vista necesita sus lentes para buscar sus lentes y poder ver bien, Esto lo digo porque el Dr. José Manuel Ramírez Aranda y yo tenemos una idea de cómo erradicar la enfermedad del VIH, y es muy fácil comprobarlo sin ningún riesgo, con la electroterapia y la ayuda oportuna de pruebas de laboratorio. La mas reciente terapia de los tres medicamentos simultáneos, lo único que está haciendo a largo plazo , es producir virus mas resistentes.
radii of the atoms
i
onization potential
HOW ARE FORMED THE MOLECULES (I ) (corrected theme)
In the theme: How are Formed the Atoms, were seen some important properties that they have. It was defined there, some important and fixed values, as the time of vertex: t
v7 = 8.27 x 10—17 Sec.; the stored energy that has each orbital electron and that is equal to: 13.6 eV.; the fundamental radius of the seven shell equal to: rF = 1.13763 x 10—10 m., As all the electrons are similar, all them ought to behave in an equal form when they are affected by equal effects In all atoms, that are formed by binary systems, the positive and the negative particles always try to behave in similar way. The orbital electrons try to move around the whole number shells (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 shells), with a velocity: vn = v1 / n = 2,160 / n Kms./ Sec.: The attraction (in the binary systems) between the positive particles and the negative ones is more effective than the rejection forces between the particles with the same sign. All these is produced without affecting the invariant values mentioned at the beginning of this theme. If by any reason can not be realized the fixed values of the atoms they would be disintegrate. This means that all the effects produced in the atoms have their limitations in space, time, energy, etc.; but also can be some variations that in some way is as a liberty for the atomic particles; in this way an orbital electron can move in a subshell, in accordance with the condition of the atoms, their temperature, the chemical reaction, and other facts, as will be seen hereIn our design of the model of molecule will attach to all have been say before. Maybe some times will not understand what produces some effects, but we will be very much strict in accept it if fulfills the required condition. By now we will limit to study the most elementary molecules formed by two or three elements. If we are strict in accepting the fixed and invariant values, in a molecule formed by two elements (two atoms), both atoms ought to have their seven shells with equal dimension of their radiuses.
In the theme: How are Formed the Atoms have been worked with the different radiuses that have the atoms, but it was seen that there are some variations in such radiuses due to the ionization potential, to the deposited potential, that here will denominate: balanced potential, because as will be seen in the numerical examples, in the same way that helps to the ionization potential to take out an electron of an atom; could help to the ionization potential to introduce the electron to other atom (to the other atom of the molecule). This could be interpreted as between the balanced potential and the ionization potential can be a change or variation of their properties; in some conditions the balanced potential could be transformed in ionization potential, and vice versa, the ionization potential could be transformed in balance potential.
In the table of radiuses are given the dimension of them, when they are in form of elements in a stable state. In an isolated atom there is an interchange of energy between all the parts that form it. In a molecule also there is some interaction between all the atoms that form it. Here will give a model of molecule formed by two or three atoms. For to form the molecule, being respectfully of the rules have been determine in the explanation of other phenomena; then the atoms are forced to have the same radius. Also will be consider there will be some interchange between the ionization and the balanced potentials.
In a molecule formed with two atoms, in a given instant, that is equal to the time of jump (7 shell): one of the atoms is as an ionized one; that is, a binary system of it has not its negative particle, or orbital electron, or binding electron that is moving in the other atom. In the next time of jump the binding electron will be moving in the first mentioned atom; and the second atom will be as an ionized one, and so on, happens in each time of jump. Of course this is verify in one of the two binary systems corresponding to the seven shell in each one of the two atoms Originally it was consider that the molecable or binding electron, jumped from one atom to the other one of the molecule in a time of orbit, describing a trajectory similar to an eight (8). When the electron moves in one atom, its corresponding binary system employs its energy in deflects the trajectory of the electron; in the other atom the positive particle of its active binary system without its negative particle, accumulate energy during a time of jump: tj; in such way that when the binding electron is in a coincident side of both atoms, the electron changes its trajectory from the active atom toward the ionized one; and so on, is repeated this process and change from an ionized atom to an active one, and vice versa. In the coincident side of both atoms, the active one is affected by the ionization potential produced by the ionized atom; and the ionized atom, with the balanced energy accumulated. during a time of jump attracts the binding electron to its orbit. This means that a alanced potential can be transformed in an ionization potential when the balanced ones tends to grows and the ionization one tends to diminishes; and vice versa, an ionization potential can be transformed in a balanced one when is produce an opposite effect. It have been say in other paragraphs that the sum of the deposited and the ionization potentials, are equal to: 13.6 eV. In this way in both atoms the deposited energy is different; but the sum of them ought to be equal to 13.6 eV.
The atom that was active, has accumulated during its active time a balanced potential, that added to the ionization potential given by the no active atom, produces in it a saturated potential, equal to 13.6 eV.; After a time of jump this process is reversed This means that the balanced potential of the second atom, plus the ionization potential of the first atom given to the second one are equal to 13.6 eV.; and vice versa; this in accordance with our model.
The ionization potential of an atom, apparently is mainly a function of the size (radius) of an atom: we have for one atom that its: balanced potential / ionization potential = 1.00. The variation of the size of each atom, mainly is function or the ionization potential of the atom, but we suppose that the ionization also gives other characteristics to the atoms, as the chemical, electric and other properties; so the function r
2, ionization, only is an approximate one For the atoms to form a molecule the fore condition must verify. The ionization potential of one atom ought to be equal to its balanced potential. The balanced potential of an atom plus the ionization potential of the other atom affecting to the first one is equal to 13.6 eV. equal to a saturation potential. All these explanation will be clear up with the numerical examples; and with this, the chemistry will be transformed from a recipe technique to a scientific one.In our model of molecule with two atoms it is considered, that both have the same radius.
Molecule of Cl Na;
17Cl35; rCl = 0.99 μ; iCl = 13.0 eV. 11Na23; rNa = 1.57 μ; iNa = 5.1 eV: First will be determine the molecular radius: r = 0.5 (0.99 + 1.57) = 1.28 μ. 1.282 = 1.6384 Cl: 1 = r2 (Z / A)3 iCl = 1.282 (Z / A)3 iCl = 1.6384 (17 /35)3 iCl = 1.6384. x 0.1146iCl; iCl = 1 /0.1878 = 5.326 eV. Na: 1 = 1.6384 (11 / 23)3 iNa = 1.6384 x 0.1094 iNa = 0.1792 iNa; iNa = 1 / 0.1792 = 5.579 eV.We ignore how the atoms get determine radiuses and a determine potential of ionization; for one binary system its potential of ionization could not be bigger than 13.6 eV, other way the binary system gets ionized. In the fore numerical example it was consider that a part of such potential is employed in obtains the radiuses of the atoms, and the rest of it was employed in give to them other characteristics, as the chemical, electric, calorific, and other energetic properties. If the fore numerical result is correct: iCl + iNa = 5.326 + 5.579 = 10.905 < 13.6 eV. If the ionization potential and the radius of the atom are independent of the other potentials or energies, we have the following.
Σ i = 5.326 + 5.58 = 10.905; 10.906 / 13.6 = 0.8019; 1.6384 x 0.8019 = 1.3137 (= r corrected) Cl: 1 = 1.3137 x 0.1146 iCl = 0.1506 iCl; iCl = 6.642 eV. Na: 1 = 1.3137 x 0.1094 iNa = 0.1437 iNa; iNa = 6.958 eV. Σ i = 6.642 + 6.958 = 13.6 eV.
6.642 eV. is equal to the deposited (or balanced) energy of the Cl atom; and also is the ionization energy that the Cl atom produces in the Na atom, for this gets ionized, yielding its orbital electron to the Cl atom. 6.958 eV. is equal to the deposited energy of the Na atom; and also is the ionization energy that the Na atom produces in the Cl atom, for this gets ionized, yielding its orbital electron to the Na atom.
Zn O molecule: Considering that only a part of the ionization potential affect the radiuses of the atoms
30Zn65; rZn = 1.25 μ; iZn = 9.4 eV. 8O16; rO = 0.74 μ; iO = 13.6 eV.; r = = 0.5 (1.25 + 0.74) = 0.995 μ; r2 = 0.99 Zn: 1 = 0.99 (30 / 65)3 iZn = 0.99 x 0.0983 iZn = 0.0973 iZn: iZn = 10.277 eV.
O: 1 = 0.99 (8 / 16)3 iCl = 0.99x 0.125 iO = 0.12375 iO; iO = 8.081 eV.
Considering that all the ionization potential affect the radius of the atom:
Σ i = 10.277 + 8.081 = 18.358 eV.; 18.358 / 13.6 = 1.35, 1.35 x 0.99 = 1.336
Zn: 1 = 1.336 x 0.0983 iZn = 0.1313 iZn:
iZn = 7.614
O: 1 = 1.336 x 0.125 iO = 0.167 iO;
iO = 5.988
Σ i = 7.614 + 5.988 = 13.6.
K Cl molecule: Considering that only a part of the ionization potential affect the radiuses of the atoms
19K39; rK = 2.03 μ;
iK = 4.3 eV.; r = 0.5 (2.03 + 0.99) = 1.51 μ; r2
= 2.28 K: 1 = 2.28 (19 / 39)3 iK = 2.28 x 0.1156 iK = 0.2636 iK; iK = 3.793 eV.
Cl: 1 = 2.28 (17 / 35)3 iCl = 2.28 x 0.1146 iCl = 0.2613 iCl; iCl = 3.827 eV.
Considering that all the ionization potential affect the radius of the atom:
Σ i: = 3.793 + 3.827 = 7.620; 7.620 / 13.6 = 0.560; r2 = 0.56 x 2.28 = 1.277
K: 1 = 1.277 x 0.1156 iK = 0.1477 iK; iK = 6.77
Cl: 1 = 1.277 x 0.1146 iCl = 0.1455 iCl;
iCl = 6.83.
Σ i = 6.77 + 6.83 = 13.6
H2O molecule: Considering that only a part of the ionization potential affect the radiuses of theatoms.
:1H1: rH = 0.37 μ;
iH = 13.6 eV
8O16; rO = 0.74 μ; iO = 13.6 eV.
r = (2 x 0.37 + 0.74) / 3 = 0.4933 μ; r2 = 0.2434
H: 1 = 0.2434 (1 / 1 )3 iH = 0.2434 x 1.0 iH = 0.2434 iH;
iH = 4.109 eV
O: 1 = 0.2434 (8 / 16)3 iO= 0.2434 x 0.125 iO = 0.0304 iO;
iO = 32.868
Considering that all the ionization potential affect the radius of the atom:
Σ i = 2 x 4.109 + 32.868 = 41.086; 41.086 / 13.6 = 3.021
3.021 x 0.2434 = 0.7353
1H1:
0.7353 iH; iH = 1.36 eV.;
8O16: 0.7353 x 0.125 i0 = 0.0919 iO:
iO = 10.88 eV.
Σ i = 2 x 1.36 + 10.88 = 13.6 eV,
Monterrey, México, May 15 / 2004 February / 05 June / 05 February / 07; Manuel de Hoyos Robles
Recientemente se acaba de descubrir en Nueva York un virus del VIH mas resistente a los
medicamentos modernos.
Una pregunta: ¿Si supuestamente Einstein sabía que la velocidad de la luz en un medio refringente es menor
que en el vacío o en a atmósfera; por qué consideró que esta era una constante universal?
MULTIMOLECULES OF DNA. (corrected theme)
Till here, in a convincing way have been prove the validity of my model of the polygonal orbits of the atoms; in some way also have been prove the validity of the multimolecules. In this theme will be given a big jump, omitting many things for to study the behavior of the multimolecules with respect to the DNA. For to do this will omit many important points in the study of physics; but this will not affect us; on the contrary will evident the existence of such points.
The name of this theme has a great significant value, specially for the biologist., as will be seen forward. A great mystery of science has happened so. When the Earth born there were no life in it, neither a way to reproduce. Before to see this problem from our point of view, will be seen it how is appreciated in accordance with the accepted facts, in the present time. From a translation to the Spanish language of the “Book of Life” - ;Marshell Cavendish Limited, 1963 - were take the following ideas of how was organized the life on Earth.
The scientists think that life in Earth began since 2,500 million years ago. How happened this? How was originate the man? Our would born 4,500 millions years ago. It was formed in the same time than the other planets of our solar system, and was made in the same way. The dust and the rocks that moved around the Sun, joined due to the gravity force. Originally all the planets were formed by inert matter, as the Moon, without life and atmosphere. After 2,000 millions years was suppose that appeared the first sign of life, and in other 2,000 million years appeared plants and the man. Have been given some fascinates speculations about the origin of life; nevertheless the scientists consider that the origin of life was not a casual neither a divine event. The life was a consequence of the physical an chemic laws, acting in the Earth in accordance with the condition it had then. The Sun, the great pressure in the interior caps of the Earth, the volcanic eruptions, the electric discharges, produced heat and gases, as nitrogen, oxygen, helium, some radioactive substances. The atmosphere was mainly made by water vapor, methane, ammonia, nitrogen, but without oxygen.
Before the atmosphere was formed; the light of the Sun was too harmful for the develop of life, due to the effect of the ultraviolet radiations. In an indirect way the ultraviolet radiation contributed to the development of life, due to the action in the water vapor, that was affected forming oxygen and hydrogen; this last one, mainly escaped from the Earth; part of the oxygen was transformed in ozone; that protected us from the ultraviolet radiations. By the volcanic actions, ultraviolet radiations, the chemical actions of simple elements in the seas, the electric discharges monoacid molecules and substances `producer of proteins and nitrogen bases that produce the helical DNA.
From the fore mentioned elemental organization, to something we could call “life”, passed a long time. The living organism are very much organized. The producer of proteins are arranged so can produce long molecules with proteins and nucleic acids. Their cell have very well distributed such molecules, acting in accordance with the organism they form. How got their “message” such simple chemical products? When the theme in which were take the fore explanations was written, there were two explanations to answer the fore questions; one was given by the supporters of the protein first and other by the supporters of the nuclei acid first. In the living organism the nuclei acid acts as “coping paper” in the assembling proteins. But it is necessary tools for to join the nuclei acids first than all. Here is not possible to have one before the other. It is almost impossible that both are produced at the same time; and less possible the production of them in an spontaneous way. If the protein were formed before: where obtained the “instructions” necessary for their synthesis without the molecules? If these were the first formed: With which tools were ensemble without proteins? Only can be given an answer to both questions: Or the proteins achieve to organize by themselves by a primitive way, acting as a coping paper and as tools. And similar thing can say of the nuclei acid. The two hypothesis given before have some favorable fundaments. The supporters of the “protein first” can prove that in the primitive condition of the Earth the amino acid could be condensed by themselves for to form proteins (proteinoids) that have some degree of “auto ordination”. These proteins are not series of amino acids structured in a random way, united in chains, but seem formed with a certain structure in accordance with some simple chemical laws. Also there is other powerful proof when this proteinoids are introduced in water with salt, form immediately small spherical particles denominated micro spheres. These are similar to the living cells, as could be appreciate in the microscope; they can be feed with some adjacent molecules, can grow and divide forming other micro spheres; that is, they can act like nuclei acid without getting material. The discovery of the micro spheres, by doctor Sidney Fox of Miami University think that in the present time could be forming life.
Doctor Leslie Orgel of Institute Salk of California have prove that with small chain of nuclei acid can form a longer and ordered one; he and Francis Crick of Cambridge were the discovers of the “double helix” structure of the DNA, think that this is the original instrument. Maybe the proteins can be change to micro spheres; and the nuclei acid can reproduce by itself. With all say before have not given an answer of how was formed the life. Neither the protein nor the nuclei acids can act as the cells that “know” how to adapt to the medium and “learn” how to do this. The natural selection was the impulse force of the evolution. With the production of the photosynthesis the oxygen grew in a great rate; this happened in one millions years ago. With the oxygen the life in the Earth grows in a great scale.
When our world began to form, it had high temperature and pressures; so were formed all the elements. Some millions years after that, in many zones of the world the temperature got below 100
o C, so the water got in a liquid state, and were formed molecules as those of the living organisms. In some places the temperature was higher than in others; because this were formed multimolecules between both places, and in them flowed differential currents of electrons from the lower temperature to the higher one; following many multimoleculess trajectories; but the electrons moved by preference in the less resistant ones. In this way, these last trajectories displaced to the more resistance ones; and not only this, but as they acted as current wires, were able to attract similar atoms as they had, forming other similar conductor chain of multimolecules, by a polymerize effect. In this way could be formed many DNA multimolecules, that could work as filament conductors of differential electric current. In this filament conductors some electrons tried to escape from them, also following the less resistance way; so were formed the nucleotides, in which the electrons that try to escape from one filament moved to the other one, with less resistance than the outside way of the DNA molecule. Similar thing happened in the other filament of the FNA molecule (multimolecule). Fig.(1) is a part of a nucleotide; the explanations of the flowing differential current in it, also are similar to that of the filaments of the two DNA; so it is not necessary to extend in our explanations, giving physiological data, that we do not understand well.the fore paragraphs have been explained how originated the life in the Earth, in accordance with the knowledge accepted till the time were written them by first time Who has read something about the DNA can understand what was say in the fore paragraphs, Nevertheless, in order to make more clear our explanations, here will be given a brief description of the DNA molecules; they are formed by two parallel and long helical branches, or chains of atoms formed by a series of spacer; being each spacer constituted by one phosphoric molecule + one deoxyribonucleic molecule (see Fig. 1). The helical branches are spaced, one from each other by the nucleotide bases: adenine, guanine (purines); thiamine, cytosine (pyridoxines). In the space were is the atom H
3 will be an atom- in which the helical branch is united to the nucleotide base, substituting H3 by an atom of the base that form the nucleotide. In our model, in, the two helical branches flow two differential electric currents of equal magnitude, in the same time and direction, as will be seen forward. In the practice has been see that when in two parallels conductors flow two equal currents in the same way there is attraction between them; also it is consider that the conductors have a cover that insulate them. In the DNA molecule the nucleotide bases work as insulators and at the same time nullify the attraction force between both helical branches. For instance, in each nucleotide space of the helical branch a current is deviated toward the other helical branch by one of the two seven orbits of the connecting atom of the adjacent base; this deviated current moves to the annex base and to the other helical branch. But in this other helical branch happens an equal and opposite effect toward the first helical branch. As in all the nucleotide bases flow equal quantity of current; so the deviated current of one helical branch toward the other will be equal to the other toward the first helical branch, As a net result, there is no lost of current in the helical branches, by this reason...In my investigation work have obtained many data with which can support my theory of the model of the polygonal orbits of the atoms. Also have been given many detail that support the theory of the multimolecules. This theory was born with my model of electric conductor. In the fore paragraphs it is consider that only the live particles are able to make copy papers in order to make reproduction of the of cells. In the theme: a Model of Electric Current and it Application to Medicine) was given an example of two similar conductors wires winded in an helical way, placed parallel one to each other and affected by similar differential electric currents; there were attraction forces between them. In a similar way can imagine only one conductor acting in a medium in which are suspended small particles of dust or atoms of the same material of the conductor wire; this dust particles will be attracted by the conductor wire, so they will be arranged in a similar way than the loops of the conductor wire; in this way they will produce a copy papers. Now suppose that the winded wire is in a medium in which are suspended atoms of: C, H, N, O, P, that are the elements that form the DNA molecules; they will be attracted by the wounded wire and will be distributed in the surface of it, as was mentioned before with the dust of particles of the conductor . In the case of the 5 elements mentioned before they will be accommodate in order they get similar electric current than did the dust particles, that is equal to the current in the conductor wire.
Of course, between the conductor wire and the coping multimolecule of DNA there are many differences, but also many similitude. It is possible to avoid the problematic effects of the differences , so will be seen it in a geometrical example; for instance, in the wire conductor all the atoms have equal radiuses; not so in the in the DNA multimolecule. In our theme: How are Formed the Molecules is explained only a particular case of them, that is, of a molecule formed by two atoms. Till now we do not know how behave a molecule formed by several atoms; nevertheless, as we do not know this, we will consider some properties of it in accordance with some properties of the multimolecule of DNA; its atoms have a high degree of ionization, so there is no risk they get an electric ionization; all the atoms that form the multimocecule of DNA ought to have the same radiuses in order they form a unitary chain. Due to the ignorance of many facts, all the data obtained here will be made in a semi quantitative way, the explanation in all them will be made simultaneously with our model. Till here we will see it is possible to make copies with not live substances; and this will give us a great value of our model of multimolecule, and at the same time to the model of nucleic acid first.
In other themes of this work as been given a model explaining how the DNA molecules produce a copy of it, acting atoms similar to it; this due that a differential electric current flows along the DNA molecule. The fore differential electric current only has the capacity to attracts the atoms for to form one similar DNA molecule. After the original DNA molecule as made a copy of it as was say; the copy will try to separate of the original one. We can conceive several model for to do this; originally was given a model considering that the copy model, after it was made; gets a rotation movement around the original one, in a similar way than a screw can get of a bolt. Next will be see other model of separation we consider more fictile.
When the differential electric current advance in the original DNA molecule, at the same time attracts the copy material, forming the copy DNA. After this current moving in the original DNA has formed the copy DNA, jumps to such copy and begins to move also in the copy in opposite direction; because this. between both DNA molecules will be a rejection force. This will be manifested in each instance in each space of the molecules; unwinding each space, till is covered all the length of the DNA; and as in each unwinding space both DNA (the original and the copy) separate, at the end of this process will be two independent DNA with the original form After the unwinding and separation of both molecules, they recuperate their original form (of winded one).
In figure (1) is represented a single space of DNA molecule formed with one phosphoric acid molecule + one deoxyribonucleic molecule formed with four elements: oxygen (O, O1, O2, O3, O4); hydrogen (H, H1,H2, H3); phosphor (P); carbon (C, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5). In our model we will consider that the differential electric currents move along the following trajectory: H1-O1- P- O2-C1- C2- C3- C4- O3-H2. In order that the molecule works as a unitary system, all the fore atoms ought to have the same radiuses. In the theme : How are Formed the Molecule is given the solution for a molecule with two atoms; but a molecule formed by more atoms could be affected by all them, so that all their atoms get the same radiuses. As here only will give qualitative values, all the required values will be obtained considering lineal variations, in the hydrogen atoms, as they only have one orbital electron, we will consider that they can vary the size of their radiuses with minimum forces. The hydrogen atoms rather serve for to regulate the flux of the current in an indirect way; also contribute to unite the phosphate with the deoxyribonucleic molecules, for to form long chain molecules. In this way the extreme H atoms get free, also one O in each space of DNA. Other considerations will be given in explaining our model in Fig.(1). In this figure some atoms of the fore mentioned trajectory are connected to other adjacent atoms; that are outside the mentioned trajectory, they contribute to uniform the size of the radiuses and also contribute to regulate the current. The radiuses of the atoms are has follow: r
H = 0.37 μ; rO = 0.74 μ; rP = 1.10 μ; rC =0.77 μ.The first atom of the space of molecule is H
1, this gets free when the spaces unite forming long molecules. The next atom O1 could have a radius: r2 = rO = 0.74 μ.The third atom of the space of molecule: P, has: r
3 = rP = 1.10 μ, but is affected by 4 adjacent atoms of O (rO = 0.74 μ) and one O1 that is affected by H1, rO1 = (0.74 + 0.37) / 2 = 0.55 μ; r3 = rP = (1.10 + 0.74 x 4 + 055) / 6 = 0.77 μ; The fourth atom: 02, r4 = rO = (0.74 x 2 + 0.77) / 3 = 0.75 μ The fifth atom: C1, its radius: r5 = rO = 0.74 x 3 / 3 = 0.74 μ The sixth atom: C2, r6 = rC = 0.77 x 4 / 4 = 0.77 μ The seventh atom: C-- 3 or 4 (?) r7 = rC = (0.77 x 4) / 4 = 0.77 μ. The eight atom: C4, r8 = rC = 0.77 x 4 / 4 = 0.77 μTThe night attom:O
3, r9 = rO == 2 x 0.74 / 2 = 0.74 μμMonnterrey, Mex ico, Octoberr 2 / 04 Manuel de Hoyos Roblles

THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT. (checked)
moving, the corpuscles of the ray will have a velocity equal to: (c +> v). Now that I have study the energies could have an electron, have arrive to some conclusions; one of them is that the electron, by itself has a determine quantity of active corpuscles; of them a proportion is employed in giving the orbital velocity of the electron; maybe this proportion is not a fixed one for each shell; and can vary between some limited values; but between this tolerance, the fore mentioned proportion ought to be something unavoidable; there are many reason for this, but here have no space to mention them. In accordance with the fore explanations, will work with a (H) atom. If the atom is into a huge celestial body, could be compressed in such way, that its binary system is reduced to the size of the first shell. In this condition the orbital electron will move at a velocity: v1 = 2,160 Kms./ Sec. If by an explosion, or any other reason the pressure of the atom is reduced and the binary system could grows till the seven shell: Into the atom there is not any free fluid, as the air in the atmosphere, that cam brake the velocity of the electron, so, this will continue moving at: v1 = v7 = 2,160 Kms./ Sec in the seven shell. This could means that if the electron moves in the seven shell at the same velocity as in the first shell, its kinetic energy K7 will grows in the same proportion. The concept of kinetic energy in the corpuscles has not the same meaning than in the macroscopic world. A corpuscle, by itself has a velocity; we can not say that it has more energy when moving at more velocity. In a huge celestial body, with an explosion, a part of it can get light velocity; in this part, with other explosion, gets other light velocity, so we have two light velocities with respect to the original body; and so on, the corpuscles can get velocities of three or more light velocity with respect to the original bodyBecause all these, if the orbital electron is moving at a velocity: v
7 = v1 = 2,160 Kms./ Sec. in the seven shell, during a prolonged time… it is because the corpuscles that produce the kinetic energy in the seven shell move at: 7 c velocity: I say all these, because about 1980, in several scientific publications were mentioned some quasars that move at several light velocities. It was affirmed this because in three years the quasars moved in a space bigger than 26 light years: If the light velocity could not be faster than (C ), it would not be possible to receive any radiation of such quasars, because any radiation emitted toward the Earth will be aberrated by the velocity of the emitter quasar (of 9 c) in a perpendicular ray.. We suppose that if the corpuscles are moving at several (c) velocity, after certain time they get the (9 c) velocity.In this year the theory of relativity get one century of existence. This is based in the constant of the light velocity and that this is of undulate character. The fundamentals of this science, as those of modern physics are too contradictory and ambiguous, and this idea is not new, but; always have been know that light has less velocity in a refringent medium. A ray of light, when is reflected perpendicular in a mirror at (c) velocity, reflects in the opposite way with the same velocity; for to do this, its velocity change from (c) velocity to zero velocity; and from zero velocity to (c) one in the opposite way. In the centenary existence of modern physics has been vigorously defended by the physicists. One lie can be covered with other lie, For Einstein the light velocity was a universal constant, not so the time; in accordance with this, in a refringent medium the time vary slower than in empty space; this is false because the supporters of the undulate theory of light have to accept that the wave length (λ) is smaller, but the frequency (ν ) does not change, in spite it is a direct function of the time.. It was supposed that if we move at light velocity the time does not pass . I was young when it was accepted that the distant stars were receding from us at light velocity. If now I am old and faulty. How can explain this? I we are moving at light velocity with respect to the distant galaxies?
With all their energy of the physicists, in the present time have try to save a theory full of contradictions and dualities, as is the relativity (and all the modern physics). If in 1945, with the theories of the aberration, of my father, it was not possible that the theories of relativity were rejected. In 1980 it ought to prove that the theories of Einstein were wrong founded. Before to continue with these explanations; for the person that are really interested in this theme; I recommend to read my theme:. The Tcherenkov´s Radiation and a theme that was written in the magazine: New scientists (25 June 1980): Do Quasars Expand Faster Than Light? As in the year 1980 had been observed three quasars that moved at faster velocity than light: 3C 345, 3C 279, 3C 273. Here we will talk specially of this last, that is at a distance of 3 x 10
9 light years from us. By radio-astronomic observations, in three years, it had displaced a distance as 26 light years. The supporter of the relativity theory could be able to argument that the space there is between the quasar and the Earth the rays of the radiations were deflected as if were affected by a huge and magnifying lent that increased the trajectory of the quasar ten times; but this argument could not be valid because did not work with the adjacent stars. The supporter of the relativity theory talk of the superluminous velocity that is produced by radio-waves of the electrons emitted by the quasar.They have consider that during the observation time of the 3C 273 quasar, this has emitted in a direction approximate to the Earth a series of electrons in a straight line and at a velocity equal to that of light; the space between the electrons is at equal distances (r ); so they were emitted each one in a lapse of time: t = r / c. The electron that is at a distance ® from the point of emission of the quasar in a given instant emits a radio-wave that propagates in all directions, as a sphere at light velocity. The fore following electron, in a time: t / 9 after, emits other similar radiation. The two fore following electron emits other similar radiation at a time 2 t / 9 after the first one…..and so on are repeated these ‘process till the fore 10 following electron that produces its radiation in a time: 9 t / 9 = t, after the first one, and at a distance of 11 r from the emitter point of the quasar; and in this instant the first electron and will be at a distance 2 r from the point of emission of the quasar; in a time 10 t /9 will emits its second radio-wave radiation, and the 11 fore following electron will emits its corresponding radio-wave; in this instant, in the point of emission of the quasar will be emitted other electron; and so on, along a distance of: 3 x 10
9 light years. The value of ®, by far must be smaller than the wave length (λ) of the radio-wave, in order to have confide super luminous waves, it ought to be few meters, as will understand better forward. from us at light velocity You did not understand the fore explanation? Do not worry, neither the authors of it do…Considering the radio-waves spheres in a given instant, can be adjusted into an involving surface of a cone whose base is proportional to a circle with radius equal to: (r ), and its height is equal to: (10 r). A radial straight line in the surface of this cone from the vertices to its base, will represent a superluminous radio-wave, that will recede normally from the electrons at a velocity equal to (c), and recede in a diagonal way from the vertices of the involving cone at a velocity of: 10 c, that last is the super luminous velocity, in accordance with the physicists and astronomers. The most honest commentary can make, is the absurd that result a line of electrons as the mentioned one, and that can be perceived a wave radiation in diagonal way…. -
Monterrey, Mexico, march / 20 00 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
COMENTARIOS
Durante muchísimos millones de milenios de existencia de la vida en nuestro planeta, todos los seres vivientes, incluyendo a los mas elementales hemos sido influenciados por todas las lees de la naturaleza, de manera tal que nos hemos adaptado de la mejor manera para sacar el mayor provecho, y para evitar de la mejor manera los efectos negativos de ella. Todo esto nos ha permitido desarrollar nuestros sentidos. En el siglo XX, Einstein, Bohr, y otros investigadores, que merecen todo nuestro respeto, porque de alguna manera contribuyeron grandemente al progreso de la ciencia, hicieron con criterio recetario caso omiso de lo aquí dicho y han influenciado de una manera subjetiva a todos los físicos modernistas y a otros investigadores, con ideas de la física moderna.
Todos los que no estamos influenciados por ideas subjetivas, desde los mas ignorantes a los mas bien documentados podemos decir, con todo respeto y de acuerdo con las ideas lógicas que nos dan nuestros sentidos, que los fundamentos de la física moderna están basados en conceptos contradictorios y ambiguos, que se tendrán que desechar en el futuro. En el presente, un siglo es suficiente para desechar esto.
Hace como 45 años, leí en un libro sobre una encuesta, que si mal no recuerdo se efectuó en una prestigiada universidad como la de Princeton; esta consistía en que los catedráticos participantes incluyeran en una hoja el nombre de los diez científicos mas importantes de la historia; en todos ellos se incluyó a Einstein en primer lugar.
En esa época no me dedicaba a la investigación, sino a mi profesión de ingeniero civil, como modus vivendi; sin embargo yo nunca me influencié por el carácter subjetivo y ambiguo de la física moderna, y no por ignorancia, sino porque siempre fui partidario de las ideas de mi padre. Si yo hubiera participado en esa encuesta, no le hubiera dado ningún lugar a Einstein, esto sin dejar de reconocer su gran capacidad intelectual (aunque equivocada). Si en la actualidad participara en una encuesta como esta pondría: 1) Newton 2) Galileo 3) Boltzmann y Max Planck 5) Pasteur 6) Lord Kelvin 7) a n) a los esposos Curie, Kepler, Volta, Ohms, Fermi, Rutherford, Lavoisier,, y muchos otros grandes investigadores.
En todo esto que digo podría estar equivocado, y tendría que aceptar ideas que no están de acuerdo con las mías, si alguien me lo demostrara en armonía con estas, prefirieron callar. Einstein tampoco la encontró; pero en vez de callar consideró que existía una mala interpretación en todo esto. No le quiero quitar méritos por dicha actitud, al contrario, lo hubiera ganado, si al ir avanzando en su investigaciones hubiera ido eliminando todas las divergencias. De cualquier manera, con sus teorías erróneas dio un paso adelante a la física, lo que permitió un gran progreso de esta en el siglo XX: Entre algunos de los grandes investigadores que nunca estuvieron de acuerdo con las teorías de la relatividad, pero que no la pudieron combatir por falta de mas conocimientos, podemos mencionar a: Michelson, Max Planck,, Poincaré. Cuando en la universidad de Berlín (ETH), se interesaron porque Einstein perteneciera a su personal docente, consultaron a Poincaré, que aparte de ser un gran investigador era una persona muy íntegra. El informe que dio fue al de que Einstein era un gran investigador, con ideas muy originales, con una capacidad extraordinaria para poderlas aplicar y que en un futuro se pudieran comprobar experimentalmente. Sin embargo que ninguna de estas ideas, en aquel entonces estaba bien orientada; pero no descartaba que entre toda esta desorientación se llegara a encontrar algo que si fuera definitivo.
Como en 1934, el físico ruso Tcherenkov, al estudiar las radiaciones producidas en un reactor nuclear, por el material de fusión sumergido en el agua del reactor; encontró que dichas radiaciones tenían una velocidad de 3.75 x 10
8 m / Sec. Sin embargo los partidarios de que la luz era una constante universal y de que esta ara de naturaleza ondulatoria, consideraron que las ondas luminosas se radiaban diagonalmente en el vértice de un cono envolvente de radiaciones producidas por electrones que se movían a la velocidad de la luz en el eje de dicho cono; en vez de frontalmente, como siempre se había aceptado (ver tema: The Tcherenkov Radiation): La explicación que dieron es que las radiaciones en forma de onda se reciben normalmente en la superficie del cono a la velocidad (c), y avanzan diagonalmente hacia el vértice del cono a una velocidad mayor que (c).En la década de los 40, mi padre tuvo oportunidad de enterarse de las teorías de la relatividad, y él también llegó a la misma conclusión que Poincaré; nada mas que él si pudo comprobar que las teorías de la relatividad estaban basadas en ideas erróneas. Mi padre comprobó que las aberraciones de las radiaciones como las de la luz, la gravedad, no nada mas se producían por efectos aberratorios geométricos, como siempre se había considerado; sino también por efectos aberratorios energéticos. Desgraciadamente los físicos que tuvieron oportunidad de ver esto, no tuvieron la suficiente visión para apreciarlo. Esto sucedió como en el año de 1945.
Como en 1980 los astrónomos observaron que los cuásares: 3C-346, 3C-279, 3C-273, se estaban expandiendo a velocidades varias veces la de la luz; pero como todos los físicos eran partidarios de la constancia de la velocidad de la luz, interpretaron estas observaciones como radiaciones diagonales producidas por electrones emitidos por dichos cuásares, que al moverse a la velocidad de la luz en el eje del cono envolvente de radiaciones, ya mencionado, daban la apariencia de mayores velocidades de expansión. Esta apreciación es muy pobre, porque una cosa es apreciar que algo se tuvo que mover a una velocidad mayor que la de la luz para poderse desplazar determinado espacio, y otra cosa muy diferente es estar observando que ese algo se está moviendo a una velocidad mayor que la de la luz.
Ahora en mayo / 2005, por deducciones teóricas he demostrado que las radiaciones de ionización de los átomos de potasio tienen una velocidad igual a: 381,000 Kms./ Seg. Con los conocimientos científicos vigentes es relativamente muy fácil comprobar esto y acabar con todas estas intolerancias tan grandes. Existe un interés exagerado en proteger unas ideas erróneas, y todo lo contrario en aceptar algo más lógico como las ideas de mi padre y mías Estamos en el siglo XXI, y una actitud como esta no puede ser científica, es antigalileica, y muy injusta, por el poco aprecio que se tiene al trabajo de los que difieren de ellos. Mi idea ha sido que todo se apegue a la lógica, no se trata de desacreditar a Einstein ni a ningún investigador; en cierta forma ellos han contribuido grandemente al progreso de la ciencia. Los que lo están desacreditando son los que soportan unas ideas que fueron buenas cuando se concibieron, pero no ahora. Si algún día se reconocen las ideas de mi padre y las mías como buenas; y en el futuro alguien descubre otras que las puedan sustituir por ser mejores; no me gustaría que alguien nos las siguiera defendiendo; me conformaría con el beneficio que hubiesen hecho, y no con el mal que pudieran hacer al negarle el valor a algo mejor. Me da mucha pena por Einstein, que le esté sucediendo esto; el recibió toda clase de reconocimientos y murió creyendo en lo imperecederos de algunos de sus trabajos, de todos los halagos, y de mucho mas; pero no nos podemos salir de la verdad sin perjudicar a todos inclusive a él, que todo lo hizo pensando en el bien de los demás. Yo tal vez me muera muy pronto; lo haré con la satisfacción de saber que he hecho algo que va a ser en beneficio de la humanidad, pero lamento que no se reconozca en mi vida.
Me gustaría saber como un partidario de la teoría ondulatoria de la luz pueda explicar de una manera lógica la propagación de un rayo láser con la teoría ondulatoria de la luz ; es decir con una onda avanzando en forma de una línea recta. Cuando Max Planck descubrió que las radiaciones, como las de la luz no se producían de una manera continua, sino por variaciones de un cuanto, en realidad descubrió una importante propiedad de las partículas que producen la luz. Al querer hacer extensiva esta propiedad a toda la materia, Einstein y Bohr cometieron un gran error (esta es mi opinión). Cuando Bpltzmann determinó la relación entre la energía y la temperatura de los átomos y moléculas, determinó una propiedad de estos; cuando estas ideas se quisieron hacer extensivas, sin ninguna limitación, se consideró la existencia de temperaturas hasta de millones de grados, cometiendo un gran error (esta es mi opinión). Einstein con su gran capacidad intelectual no se limitaba a aceptar lo que la lógica nos indica, y a veces se extralimitaba cayendo en contradicciones. En una ocasión dijo que en el mundo únicamente había unas 10 personas que entendían las teorías de la relatividad; con esto estaba demostrando que sus teorías eran erróneas (esta es mi opinión). En otra ocasión dijo que la felicidad es algo que únicamente los animales y la gente mediocre buscaban. En esto estaba completamente equivocado; porque tanto él como yo también hemos buscado la felicidad en el trabajo de investigación
En todo esto hay mucho que meditar: ¿Por qué evolucionó la ciencia física como sucedió en el siglo XX? ¿Esto fue algo ineludible? Nunca lo he creído, y voy a poner un ejemplo. Pienso que en alguna de las estrellas cercanas que observamos ene el cielo exista un planeta en que sus habitantes hayan evolucionado intelectualmente como nosotros los terrícolas; por ejemplo en Alfa Centauro; en ese planeta hubo un Ptolomeo; después un Galileo, cuyas ideas siempre fueron aceptadas, y un Newton, este último fue partidario de la teoría corpuscular de la luz. Años después otros investigadores establecieron la teoría ondulatoria de la luz y del éter; de manera que se aceptaban simultáneamente las dos teorías. Tratando de aclarar esto un Michelson centauro comprobó las diferentes velocidades que puede tener la luz, y que el éter no existe. Posteriormente, al comprobarse que existían ciertas divergencias entre las teorías vigentes y las observaciones; aparecieron científicos con diferentes teorías. Tratando de explicar esto, un “Einstein” del planeta Centauro expuso sus ideas, nada mas que aquí estas no se impusieron, porque otro científico con ideas semejantes a las de mi padre, impuso las suyas, a las cuales si se les hizo caso; así que a la idea de que la luz era una constante universal, nunca se pudo establecer en el planeta centauro. Como los científicos centauros han sido mas tolerantes que los terráqueos, no ha habido rivalidad entre ellos por sus diferentes ideas que se ha aceptado simultáneamente; nadie trata de imponerse sobre los demás, no hay rivalidad, sino cooperación y aceptan todo lo que ofrezca alguna posibilidad de progreso. Aquí en la tierra estamos pensando que en un lejano futuro se mande una sonda espacial hacia el planeta centauro que tarde mas de 10 años en ir a dicho planeta y regresar a la tierra. En el planeta centauro, que también han observado la expansión de los cuásares dichos, ya están pensando, y posiblemente ya estén trabajando en una sonda que tarde unos dos años en venir a la tierra y regresar a centauro; todo esto aprovechando las grandes presiones que se pueden obtener al producir el plasma...
Monterrey, México, junio / 2005
Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
In a general way have been see the forces that produce the orbit of the atoms; with our model was given a satisfactory explanation of them from a magnetic point of view; nevertheless the few explanations can not be complete if it is not seen the magnetic effect that affect the electrons; these are the ionizations effects, that also will contribute to clear more the fore explanations. Studying the Zeeman´s effect will be understand better how are produced the ionizations. Before study this problem I had the idea that the propeller fluids in the atomic particles were produced by a single propeller particle; but now that I began to study the Zeeman´s effect have found that the radiations produced in an atom, when affected by a magnetic field are formed by several spectral lines; the interpretation I have given to this is that each line correspond to one propeller fluid; in the literature I have read they esteem that there are 3 lines (normal effect), 5, 7, lines (anomalous effect), and some consider could be more lines. I have made some considerations in which esteem could not be produced more than 7 lines. Have consider that the “recipient” were are the propeller particles is divided in 28 equal parts that correspond to the stored energy, minus the orbital energy of the electron. With such division are satisfy the condition of the perpendicular forces and of the ionization effect. Forward will be explained better this.
In studying the orbits of the electrons can be appreciated more than two magnitude of magnetic energies: one small one produced by the perpendicular forces, as was seen before, other that is produced by the velocity of the orbital electrons along their orbits; also the actions of the external magnetic field over the electron. It was seen before that an electron moving in the seven shell produces a magnetic field every orbit; it deflects 360o in a time of orbit (to,) equal to that of other electron moving around a loop at the same angular velocity (in the same time to). But between the magnetic field of the orbital electron and that of the electron moving in the loop there is a difference; the orbital electron in to / 2 (in 14 vertices) produce the field in one direction, and in the other to / 2 produce the field in the opposite direction;. and the electron in the loop always produce the field in one direction.
For ionize the atom are required energies of magnitude:
Ei = i eV. = 1.6 x 10—19 joule .
With the fore energy the electron gets a liberation velocity: vi, so we have:
Ei
T
HE ORBITS OF THE ELECTRONS.- THE ZEEMAN´S EFFECT (I)When I conceived the model of the polygonal orbits, I had to take in account many facts, as could understand who had red this work; one of them was to consider that the orbital electrons move around their respective shells, covering all their surface. Beside this it was esteemed that their translation movement they have, is affected by perpendicular forces, in such way that their orbits were not only produced in a plane, but also have an angular movement perpendicular to them In this theme, every time we talk of an orbit (of the electrons), we are referring to the regular polygonal one equal to one isoperimetral of one circle (a polygon of 28 sides in the seven shell). For to understand better all these, it is necessary to study again in this point the theme: A Model of Electric Current and its Application to Medicine, in Fig.(2) of such theme, schematically is represented the trajectory of an orbital electron, when this is in vertex (Z) is affected by a perpendicular force that deflects its trajectory an angle (a´); the orbit is deflected an angle (a) . In accordance with the figure it is suppose hat the perpendicular forces act downward. In this point the readers can get confused if we do not make more extensive and detailed our explanations; they could think that he perpendicular forces always will work in a downward way. But if we consider the polygonal orbit in a isoperimeter with the a circular one, in a space of trajectory of 360o (one orbit), half of this orbit in the figure will be in front; in this space the orbit will have downward angular movements. In he other half orbit the perpendicular forces can not act downward, because the fore angular movement will be nullified; so we consider that such forces act downward in half time of orbit; and in the other half time of orbit act upward. From a mechanical criterion, this is completely correct. Apparently, from a physical point of view the transition of the perpendicular forces from a downward action to a upward would be in a uniform way, not in a sudden one. We can not accept the fore supposition, as will be seen forward, also, if we accept a uniform transition we will be forced to accept that the orbital electron is not affected in an equal way in all the vertices, and this is not true. By the moment will get pending this problem. Here only want to clear up a point that can confuse the readers and that we omitted, because in order to advance in many other problems, we did not take in account.
In this problem and in some others, generally the solution was consider studding only the seven shell. For instance, in the seven shells the perpendicular forces are smaller than in the interior ones. Here only have given some variations of our model without more details that will correspond to other themes. As I think that with some figures can make more illustrative the trajectory of an orbital electron (third shell…) In order to simplify the explanations are consider two imaginary points N and S that will define the position of the orbits; also in the figures are represented all the vertices of an orbit: 0, 1, 2, 3, ..6, … 12. In order to see more clear the rotation of the orbit of the electron; here will consider in the figures the perpendicular forces much bigger than really are. In the figure the point N will coincide with point O. In Fig.(A) is seen a front side of the atom and the electron orbit (of half a circle): 0, 1, 2, … 6, This orbit start from point N (= O) and does not end in point S because the perpendicular forces in the figure act from left to right side on the electron trajectory. In Fig.(B) is seen the opposite side of the atom. In order could be appreciated all the trajectory of the electron, in the figure is given an angular movement D to the atom in the same plane is seen, in such way that the vertex 6 will be in the lower side of the circle. Here the perpendicular forces will act from the right side to the left side in the figure, and the vertex 12 will be at a distance 2 D from point N. Considering that the perpendicular forces change their directions of action every half orbit, the trajectory of the orbital electron will be as a spiral that covers all the shell. In Fig.(C) is indicated the electron trajectory if the perpendicular forces always acted from the left to the right side (downward action…); in this case the orbital electron will return to point N every 360o; so, this last trajectory could not be satisfactory..
The downward and the upward action of the perpendicular forces, of course are produced in all the orbits of the atoms, but with a bigger potential in the most interior shells. Here only will be seen this problem in the seven shell, because in this are evidenced and produced mainly all the effects and behavior of such forces. For to have an idea how work the perpendicular forces we can imagine that in each half time of orbit (14 times of vertex in the seven shell) the orbital electron gets the corpuscles of the propeller fluid for deflects normally the orbit downward 14 times; when this process finish the electron gets other corpuscles of propeller fluid that will deflect normally the electron upward 14 times; and so on.. All these is produced due to magnetic effects. An electron in a time of orbit moves around a orbit 360o; a charge as that of the electron moving around a loop in a time of orbit produce a magnetic field at a rate of: 1 / 28 t> = 1 / 28 x 8.25 x 10—17 = 4.33 x 1014 electrons / Sec. = 4.33 x 1014 / 6.3 x 1018 = 6.87 x 10--5 coulombs / Sec. All have say before is in accordance with our theory and with our model of polygonal orbit, and because this, can be accepted.
In the theme: A Model of Electric Current and its Application to Medicine is explained the production of the perpendicular forces and of their angular deflection; as a remembering will be repeated some of that, with some other data. In Fig.(2) is indicated the trajectory of an electron; in point (Z) we have: r a = (p r /14) a ´ The energy of a perpendicular deflection is: m = 9.2754 x 10—28 joule The kinetic energy of the orbital electron is: Ee = 0.5 x 9,1091 x 10—31 (3.09 x 105)2 = 4.3487 x 10—20 joule If vi is the perpendicular velocity of the orbital electron. in point (Z) we have: m = 9.2754 x 10—28 / 2 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 vi2 ; vi = 22.1 m / Sec. vi = 308,560 / 15632 = 22.78 m / Sec.
In a general way have been see the forces that produce the orbit of the atoms; with our model was given a satisfactory explanation of them from a magnetic point of view; nevertheless the few explanations can not be complete if it is not seen the magnetic effect that affect the electrons; these are the ionizations effects, that also will contribute to clear more the fore explanations. Studying the Zeeman´s effect will be understand better how are produced the ionizations. Before study this problem I had the idea that the propeller fluids in the atomic particles were produced by a single propeller particle; but now that I began to study the Zeeman´s effect have found that the radiations produced in an atom, when affected by a magnetic field are formed by several spectral lines; the interpretation I have given to this is that each line correspond to one propeller fluid; in the literature I have read they esteem that there are 3 lines (normal effect), 5, 7, lines (anomalous effect), and some consider could be more lines. I have made some considerations in which esteem could not be produced more than 7 lines. Have consider that the “recipient” were are the propeller particles is divided in 28 equal parts that correspond to the stored energy, minus the orbital energy of the electron. With such division are satisfy the condition of the perpendicular forces and of the ionization effect. Forward will be explained better this.
In studying the orbits of the electrons can be appreciated more than two magnitude of magnetic energies: one small one produced by the perpendicular forces, as was seen before, other that is produced by the velocity of the orbital electrons along their orbits; also the actions of the external magnetic field over the electron. It was seen before that an electron moving in the seven shell produces a magnetic field every orbit; it deflects 360o in a time of orbit (to,) equal to that of other electron moving around a loop at the same angular velocity (in the same time to). But between the magnetic field of the orbital electron and that of the electron moving in the loop there is a difference; the orbital electron in to / 2 (in 14 vertices) produce the field in one direction, and in the other to / 2 produce the field in the opposite direction;. and the electron in the loop always produce the field in one direction.
For ionize the atom are required energies of magnitude: Ei = i eV. = 1.6 x 10—19 joule . With the fore energy the electron gets a liberation velocity: vi, so we have: Ei = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 vi2 vi = (1.6 x 10—19 / 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31)0.5 = 592,700 m / Sec. The energy of the orbital electron expressed in eV is: x 10—20 / 1.6 x 10—19 = 0.272 eV..
We consider that the magnetic field produced by interior effects ought to be more intense into the electron than those produced by external effects; in a quantity; 13.60.5 = 3.68; this value also is equal to:1.6 x 10—19 / 4.3487 x 10—20. = 3.68.
Although we have not study many facts of magnetism, always have esteemed that the minimum magnetic energy can affect in a signify way the ionization of an atom is that of 1 eV. With the result obtained before also have prove that the exterior magnetic potential, although are different in all the atoms.; in some aspect part of they are equal in all them; this is in the inducive effect of energy that gets the electron is going to be ionized; the equal part in all the atoms is: (3.68 times more effective than that of the exterior field). In all the numerical examples given here it is consider that: v7 (the velocity of the electron in the seven orbit) is equal in all the atoms; of course this, and other facts are approximate ones… Into our approximation, when the atom is ionized, is produced an energy equal to ( i) due to the external action of ionization, plus that of the induced electron: 3.68 x 0.272 = 1, so:
ni = i + 1 = to the spectral lines energy. The stored energy of an electron is: 13.6 eV.; 13.6 – 0.272 = 13.33 vi = 592,700 x 13.33 = 2,163,800 m / Sec.
In our model will consider that the stored energy of the electron is equal to 13.6 eV. From this we find the perpendicular forces that act in the vertices; also the required force to ionize the atom; here is consider that the atom is ionized by an inducive process; the inducive micro- corpuscles have practically a null mass, so the induced effect and the propeller fluid are produced at expense of the mass of the same electron.
When an atom gets ionized are liberated some of the parts of the stored energy, in a lineal proportion with the degree of ionization, also the one due to the induced electron, as was say before; all these with the energetic magnitude of the ionization potential. If it is supposed that the 13.33 eV of the stored energy are liberated, we will have: (ni – 1) liberated parts, plus 1 of the induced electron. ni = vi / v7 = 2,163,800 / 309,000 = 7 parts.; v7 = velocity of the orbital electron
The stored energy, as was say, is employed in produce the ionization in the orbital electron, and also in produce the perpendicular forces. In other themes was esteemed that the first mentioned effect was produced in a time of jump: tj = 135,632 tv. In our model of ionization will divide the stored energy. in 28 equal parts. In this way every part can produce: no = 135,632 / 28 = 4,844 perpendicular forces in a time of jump. As in one orbit there are 28 vertices, in a time of jump tj, in each vertex are produced: nv = 4844 / 28 = 173 perpendicular forces With respect to the propeller particles (mp) produced by the induced electron, are required: 4 parts / tj = one propeller particle (mp)
In Fig.(A) and Fig.(B) is seen that in a given instant, in the same plane in which is the orbital electron are the points N and S, in an approximate way so the spectral line due to the induced electron will .be produced by polarized radiations in the same plane mentioned before The perpendicular forces and the exterior magnetic field act normally to the plane of the orbital electron, so the spectral lines are produced by polarized radiations perpendicular to the fore one.. When the orbital electron is ionized, the magnetic radiations are emitted radial or perpendicular to the orbit of the electron in point N (see FigA). Next will be seen some numerical examples, and with them will be explained other properties of the radiations. Because we ignore many facts, in the numerical examples will be given forward have not take in account the influence can have the different velocities of the orbital electron of the seven shell in the variation of the ionization effects; so will consider this velocity equal to: v7 = 309,000 m / Sec. in all our examples.
Let see the Br atom; rBr = 1.14 m; iBr = 11.8 eV.
Ionization energy: Ei = 11.8 x 1.6 x 10—19 = 1.888 x 10—18 joule
Velocity that gets the electron when is ionized
Ei = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 vi2
vi = (1.888 x 10—18 / 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31)0.5 = 2,036,000 m / Sec.
If it is consider that v7 = 309,000 m / Sec., and that is proportional to one propeller fluid; then the quantity of propeller fluids ni due to the exterior magnetic field will be:
ni = vi / v7 = 2.036 x 106 / 309,000 = 6.59; 309,000 m / Sec. = velocity of the orbital electron; In accordance with our model the ionization fluid plus a single one due to the inducive electron is: 6.59 + 1 = 7.59 integrated fluids. As could not be fractions of propeller fluid, we have: 6 propeller fluids due to the exterior magnetic field, plus one due to the induced electron that will be ionized. The fraction 0.59 will be distributed proportionally between 7 propeller fluids, growing their masses. This could be proved because the spectral lines get more spaced. All the radiations try to move parallel, because this, and because they do not deviate in their trajectory, 3 spectral lines are in one side of the central one; and the other 3 in the opposite side of this central one, or line produced by the induced electron. All the spectral lines are distributed in a uniform and balanced way..
Let see the Rb atom: rRb = 2.16 m; iRb = 4.2 eV.
Ei = 4.2 x 1.6 x 10—19 = 6.72 x 10—19 joule
vi = (6.72 x 10--19 / 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31)0.5 = 1,214,680
ni = 1,214,680 / 309,000 = 3.93
Let see the Cs atom: rCs = 2.35 m; iCs = 3.9 eV.
Ei = 3.9 x 1.6 x 10—19 = 6.24 x 10—19 joule
vi = (6.24 x 10—19 / 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31)2 = 1,170,495 m / Sec
ni = 1,170,495 / 309,000 = 3.79
These last two problems have their atoms with a big radius, by now we do not know what influence this could have. With the fore given results we have a double central spectral line due to the induced electron, plus one due to the external magnetic field. In one side of them there is one spectral line due to magnetic field; in the opposite side there other similar line.
Monterrey, Mexico, July, 2005
Manuel de Hoyos Robles
PROPELLER PARTICLES WITH MASS OF A NEUTRON.
When a stable atom absorbs a neutron , or an alpha particle gets a unstable state, so emits some radiations in accordance with many facts; here only will give a mechanical model, explaining how can be emitted a proton or a neutron at light velocity. If at normal condition the atom absorbs a neutron, can imagine several things: That it transform in other element with heavier amu; that it can disintegrate; or simply, that it tries to eject out it. Similar things can say if the atom absorbs an α particle. Here will limit to give a model of ejected particle with mass of a proton or a neutron.
If we suppose that the atom absorbs a neutron; this could affect to a binary system of the atom in such way that can take other neutron of a binary system; with both of them can be formed a special binary system, in which one neutron moves in the seven shell as a negative particle: and the other neutron moves in the seven nushell, as positive particle. Here could be imagine that is formed a Coulomb´s orbit in the zone corresponding to the polygonal orbits; so the distance of the two charges (neutrons…) would be equal to: r
7 = 1.13763 x 10—10 m But this model could not works, because the action of the Coulomb´s formula is not instantaneous, and is produced at lapses of time that do not correspond to that of the polygonal orbits. Other doubt we get, is why the neutrons can acts as positive, and as negative charges. Here also, we are not able to answer this doubt; the only thing can say is that if in the neutrons are positive and negative charges; it is possible that they employ them in the condition given here; for some reason we ignore yet. If a neutron is formed by corpuscles, and these can get light velocity, the neutron also can do this.Here we get forward saying that with the neutrons can be formed a specially binary systems. It was done so, thinking of a neutron moving at light velocity when is expelled; it was necessary to excite it many times, one in each vertex of the polygonal orbit. Here will be consider two velocities, that produce two impulses; one produced in an accumulative way and around the 28 sides of the polygonal orbit (7 shell). In each vertex is produced an impulse: f
>o = v^7 mn = 69,100 x 1.6748 x 10—27 = 1.1573 x 10—22 newton; v^7 = 69,100 m / Sec.; mn = 1.6748 x 10—27 Kg = mass of a neutron.. These impulses is distributed around the 28 sides of the polygonal orbit ≈ a circular orbit. The other impulse will be equal to the sum of the fore ones, but projected in a straight line (the diameter of the circle).As the neutron is emitted at a velocity of (c) (
?), it gets a kinetic energy equal to: Kn = 0.5 mn c2 = 0.5 x 1.6748 x 10—27 (3 x 108)2 = 7.533 x 10—11 joule. Its impulse is: Fn = mn c = 1.6748 x 10—27 x 3 x 108 = 5.022 x 10—18 newtonThe fore values can also be obtained taking the projection of the accumulative impulses in the trajectory in which will be expelled the neutron, so: Σ f
>o / π = Σ f> = Fn = nj f>o / π = 135,632 x 1.1573 x 10—22 / 3.1416 ≈ 5.00 x 10—18 ≈ 5.022 x 10—18 newton In this theme with a physics-mathematical way have determine how to obtain energy of an atom. Fermy determine this in an experimental and expensive way. . .Monterrey, México, March / 2007
Manuel de Hoyos Robles
THE GAS DISTRUIBUTION ENERGY (I) (corrected theme)
This theme is very much important in the study of the gases in physics; because here will change it from its probabilistic character to a determinist one. The kinetic theory of the gases has many degree of indeterminations, and this is because a poor understanding of the behavior of the atoms or the molecules that form such gases. It has been think that the atoms or the molecules, have different velocities, because they continually are shocking between themselves. I have meditated in this problem, and have concluded that although these atomic particles move in all directions, and with different velocities; it is very much problematic they can interfere in their trajectories and produce shocks. I am in accordance that the temperature of the gases grows with the velocity with which the atoms or the molecules moves; but this is also an incomplete argument.
In other themes I have say that the corpuscles as those of light, have equal capacity to for produce kinetic energy if they fixed or moving at (c) velocity; because this, and because in a gas their atoms or molecules are moving, can be consider that they emit fluids of corpuscles, that act as propulsion jets; after the fluid of corpuscles are emitted, the gas is not affected, because if the emitted corpuscles escape from it; other corpuscles that have escaped from other place, substitute them; conserving the same temperature.. Logically while more temperature has the gas, this has more free corpuscles, and its atoms or molecules move faster. With all say here it is concluded that the temperature of the gas is produced with the movement of its atoms or molecules, as could be proved by the Boltzmann´s formula, and by the free corpuscles that move in the gas, and that produce heat, as do the corpuscles of light emitted by our Sun; and also that are absorbed by the atoms or molecules of the gas, when they get exhausted. In the following paragraphs will be explained how are produced the movement of the atoms or molecules of the gas, and how they produce the temperature and pressure in the gas with the help of the corpuscles that are ejected when the atoms or molecules get their kinetic movement..
In the accepted theories it is consider that in the air (in a stable state, without wind, dust , etc,), the atmosphere at normal temperature (21
o C) the molecules of it, by preference (N2) are moving at an average velocity va1. Some of them could be moving in accordance with the accepted theories, at higher velocity than the fore one mentioned, and other at less velocity; all these due to the continuous shocks between them. I am not in accordance with this, for the reason say at the beginning of this theme.Here will study the gas of the atmosphere in a clear state, without any perturbing effect, as wind, or any dust particles. Can divide in an arbitrary and virtual way, for to simplify the explanations to the atmosphere, by cubes with: d = 1 m. by side; annex one to each other, in an isometric way, from north to south, east to west, up to down. In each cube will consider that is circumscribed an sphere of diameter: d = 1m.; the sphere will have: Exterior surface: S = π d
2 = 3.1416 m2 Volume: V = π d3 / 6 = 0.5236 m3 The atmosphere is formed (in an average way) by molecules with amu = 28.9 Mass of each molecule: ma = 28.9 x 1.674 x 10—27 = 4.8379 x 10—26 Kg. Temperatura: Ta = 273o + 21o = 2.94o KWith the fore data and by experiment was found that the atmosphere pressure at sea level is: F = 1.01 x 10
5 newtons / m2 Molecular energy of the atmosphere in accordance with the Boltzmann´s law: Ka = 1,5 k Ta = 1.5 x 1.38 x 10—23 x 294 = 6.0858 x 10—21 joule / molecule Ka = 0.5 ma va2 = 0.5 x 4.8379 x 10—26 va2 = 2.41885 x 10—26 va2 The average velocity of the molecules of the air (6.0858 x 10—21 / 2.41885 x 10—26)0.5 = 501.6 m / Sec.In accordance with classical and modern physics the atoms or the molecules of the gas have different velocities; because this , for determine the pressure and temperature that produce this gas, it is consider an average velocity of the atoms or molecules of the gas. In mechanophysics the fore solution is good in a partial way; here we consider that beside the atoms or molecules of the gas, contribute to produce the temperature and pressure, the liberated free corpuscles, that produce the movement of the mentioned atoms or molecules... Considering the action of air into a cube of 1 m
3. In an average way an air molecule moving parallel to the lateral sides of the cube, affects a square side of the cube (1 m2) in a time: t = d / va = 1 / 501.6 = 0.001994 Sec.An air molecule acts one time at its own cube, and at 501.6 – 1 = 500.6 in the adjacent cubes, in each one acts one time . In an adjacent cube is moving a molecule toward the first one cube; in such way that the action of one molecule is equivalent to 501.6 actions. Similar thing could be say if the air is confined in a cubical recipient of 1 m
3; here the molecule reflects 501.6 / Sec., times in the walls of the recipient.If now we consider that the molecule reduces its velocity at its square root: v
a10.5 = 501.60.5 = 22.396 m / Sec., each second. Because this, the time of action vary as: t´ = t0.5 = 0.0019940.5 = 0.04465 Sec. With the cubic distribution of air we got the idea how act the molecules in the atmosphere.Now will see how act the molecules in the cube The air pressure in the exterior surface of the cube is: F
a = 1.01 x 105 newtons / m2 = 1.01 x 105 S = 1.01 x 105 x 6.0 = 6.06 x 105 newtons / S m2By experiment have been obtained the pressure of air in the atmosphere Fa, at the sea level and at a temperature of 21o C. It is possible to divide in a hypothetic way the space of the atmosphere in cubes with volume of 1 m3, distributed in an isometric way; as was say before; if it is choose one of them, into it can imagine a circumscribed sphere with diameter equal: d = 1.0 m. In the sphere was determine its surface: S
O = 3.1416 m2, and its volume: VO = 0.5236 m3. In the cube we have: S = 6.0 m2; V = 1.0 m3. Considering either the cube, or the sphere; both can be circumscribed by the atmosphere, so are affected by it pressure Fa. The atmosphere mainly is constituted by nitrogen molecules: N2 = 28.9 amu. With all the fore data it is possible to determine the quantity of molecules there are into the sphere, or into the cube. The molecules of air move in all directions, either in the cube, as in the sphere; in our model they have different velocities, as was say before; but as the action (movement) of the corpuscles grow, while the movement of the molecules decrease in opposite proportion, it result correct to consider the kinetic energy of the movement as a constant for all the velocities of the molecules; so, in our problem will work for determine the different data we need, considering: vO1 = 501.6 m / Sec. In classical and in modern physics; in which it is not consider the action of the corpuscles; also have take the value. vO1, as an average one.Some paragraphs before was seen the time of action: t =
0.001994 Sec., of a molecule that moves parallel to the lateral sides of the cube; but the molecules move in all directions, so the fore value can not be applied to all them. The times of action are function of the surface S, and of the volume V, beside of the change of velocity of the molecules. With the cube or with the sphere can obtain the data we need, that are the quantity of molecules and of energy there is into the sphere or into the cube. For the cube we have: S = 6.0 m2, and V = 1.0 m3; for the sphere: SO = 3.1416 m2, VO = 0.5236 m3; S / V = 6.0 / 1.0 = SO / VO = 3.1416 / 0.5236 = 6.0The time of action of all the molecules affected by the surface (S or SO); and the volume (V or VO) grow as follow: t´´ = t (SO / VO) = 0.001994 x 3.1416 / 0.5236 = 0.01196 Sec. The velocity of a molecule decrements at a rate of va0.5; so their time of action (and of the corpuscles) vary in the same proportion: t´´´ = (t´´)0.5 = 0.011960.5 = 0.10936 Sec.
Considering the action in the surface of the sphere, that also is proportional to the action in the surface of the cube… tIV = t´´´/ V = 0.10936 / 1.0 = 0.1094 Sec. While the atmosphere pressure with an impulse: Fa = 6.06 x 105 newtons in the surface of the cube; the molecules and the free corpuscles into the cube act in the opposite way with the same impulse, in an active time: = 0.1094 Sec.; so each molecule into the cube oppose to the atmosphere pressure with tIV
an impulse / Sec.: fa´ = fa / tIV = 2.4267 x 10—23 / 0.1094 = 2.218 x 10--22 newton / Sec. The quantity of molecules (Ñ) that oppose the pressure Fa, are those that are into the cube: Ñ = Fa / fa´ = 6.06 x 105 / 2.218 x 10—22 = 2.732x 1027 molecules / cube Weight of the molecules in a cube of 1 m2. w = 129 Kgs./ m3 We obtain: w = Ñ ma = 2.732 x 1027 x 4.8379 x 10—26 = 132 Kgs / m3. ≈ 129 Kgs. / m3Considering the molecule with its average velocity: v
a1 after a time it gets zero velocity, it remain so during a lapse of time during which it absorb some corpuscles, and gets the velocity: va1 again, and so on. It has been explained that an atom of a gas varies its velocity at a rate: van0.5 m / Sec. If the maximum velocity of an air molecule in accordance with our theory is: va1 = 501.6 m / Sec., in moving a distance (L) it reduces its velocity: Δva1 = 501.60.5 = 22.396 m / Sec., so the molecule gets the velocity: va2 = va1 – Δva1 = 501.6 – 22.396 = 479.204 m / Sec. Next, this last velocity is reduced: Δva2 = va20.5 = 479.2040.5 =21.891 m / Sec.; so: va3 = va2 – Δ va2 = 479.204 – 21.891 = 457.313 m / Sec. And so on.Next will be given the reduced velocities and their decrement
415.0480.5 = 20.373; 394.6750.5 = 19.855; 374.8090.5 = 19.360; 355.0480.5 = 18.843;
336.2050.5 = 18.336; 317.8690.5 = 17.829; 300.0400.5 = 17.322; 282.7180.5 = 16.814;
265.9040.5 = 16.307; 249.5970.5 = 15.759; 233.7980.5 = 15.290; 218.5080.5 = 14.782;
203.7260.5 = 14.273; 189.4530.5 = 13.764; 175.6890.5 = 13.252; 162.4340.5 = 12.745;
149.6830.5 = 12.235; 137.4480.5 = 11.724; 125.7240.5 = 11.213; 114.5110.5 = 10.701;
103.8110.5 = 10.189; 93.6220.5 = 9.676; 83.9460.5 = 9.162: 74.8740.5 = 8.648;
66.2260.5 = 8.138; 58.0880.5 = 7.622; 50.4660.5 = 7.104; 43.3620.5 = 6.585;
36.7770.5 = 6.064; 30.7130.5 = 5.542; 25.1710.5 = 5 .017; 20.1540.5 = 4.489;
15.6650.5 = 3.958; 11.7070.5 = 3.422; 8.2850.5 = 2.875; 5.4100.5 = 2 .326;
3.0840.5 = 1.756; 1.3270.5 = 1.152
Sum of decrements: Σ = 22.396 + 21.891 + 21.385 + . . . 1.756 + 1.152 = 501.014 ≈ 501.6
In a liquid or in a solid it is easy to consider that sound can advance along the atoms or the molecules of them, because they are fixed in their places; not so in the gases in which the atoms or the molecules are constantly moving, some at higher velocity than sound. In the atmosphere, in accordance with the given conditions, such velocity vary from va = 501.6 to 0.0 m/ Sec. In the accepted theories it is consider that sound moves by waves. But taking in account waves of sound in air or in a gas result too problematic, for the reason given before. The model will be given here is taking in account that sound is manifested by some vibrations that are produced in the atoms or in the molecules; such vibration will affect to the atoms or molecules that get in contact with the medium in which is produced the sound. If the atoms or molecules are moving at bigger velocity than sound, they reduce their velocity to that of sound, emitting some corpuscles. If the atoms or molecules of the air (or gas) have less velocity than sound; when are affected by the mentioned vibrations, absorb some corpuscles, incrementing their velocity to that of sound. In this way the sound is produced by the translation movement of the atoms or molecules of the air or gas.
Monterrey, Mexico, August 1, 2006
February / 2007
Manuel de Hoyos Robles
. If I were a protected investigator of a prestige university I would win a Nobel price of physics by a work like this one.
Si Dios me dio la capacidad de beneficiar a la humanidad con mi trabajo de investigación, con mucho gusto lo seguiré haciendo, aunque nadie me lo agradezca, y se piense mal de mi, porque no se comprenda que todo lo que diga y haga es pensando en el bien de todos, mas que en el mío; a mi padre le sucedió lo mismo; yo no soy mas que una persona que tengo vergüenza y dignidad. Hay muchas injusticias en todo esto, porque las personas egoístas nada mas piensan en recibir los agradecimientos (aunque no los merezcan) pero no en darlos.
Este tema tiene un valor muy grande, porque le da a la teoría de los gases un valor completamente determinista y tendrá que sustituir a las teorías vigentes en este terreno, caracterizadas por su carácter probabilístico; ojalá sea pronto; porque una física contradictoria y ambigua como es la física moderna se ha impuesto por un siglo con ideas que desde hace tiempo ya resultan mas perjudiciales que benéficas.
MODEL OF REFRINGENT SUBSTANCE (I) (corrected theme)
If in modern physics it is consider that light is a universal constant: c = 3 x 10
8 m / Sec. they are not able to explain why light moves at lower velocity in a refringent body; also they could not explain why some quasars can expand at velocities as big as 9 c. In a simple way can be explain all these, saying that light is not a universal constant. But if in most of the experiments and observations have obtained values of the velocity of light equal to: c = 3 x 108 m / Sec. the fore given affirmation results problematic. In other themes have been say that the corpuscles as those of light move from zero velocity and get the light one with out any force, for reason ignored by all us. Other thing can be say is that if light is emitted from a body that is moving at (v) velocity, grts: c +> v After a lapse of time or of distance, that could be a differential one, the light radiation always try to get the (c) velocity; this in accordance with the quasars observations, that expanded at 9c, and were observed at light velocity (c); and with the dynamic of the corpuscles and microcorpuscles. In this theme will be see some reasons why the corpuscles change their velocity, for instance, into a refringent medium.As we have not the impediment to consider the velocity of light as variable; we can explain its variation into a refringent body. When light enters to such medium it diminishes its velocity, due that the atoms or molecules affect the corpuscular radiations that penetrate in such medium. If we talk of a refringent medium, we are talking of a transparent one. It is not difficult to imagine a body fulfilling such conditions., because all atoms have empty spaces between them, and also because between the atoms and molecules there are such spaces; so the corpuscles can move freely in such spaces, specially if the atoms are uniformly distributed in such body. The orbital electrons emit some fluid; maybe this contribute to reduce the transparency, because the transparent substances are not formed by heavy atoms.
When a ray of light penetrates into a refringent medium, the superficial atoms affect such radiation, reducing its velocity; not so, the more interior ones, as will be seen in our numerical examples. The corpuscles of the radiation that were affected by the superficial atoms get saturated for some time, we have consider equal to a multimolecular one: t
m = 2.8 x 10—5 Sec. Between other reason, this is in accordance with our model of electric current… In such way that all light radiation that penetrate in the refringent medium remain with the same refringent conditions, in the fore mentioned time. In other themes have say that the corpuscles as those of light, as gravity microcorpuscles have the same energy if they move slower, as light velocity; in the first case their energy is latent, and in the second one is manifested as a kinetic one. With the fore explanation it is easy to understand the behavior of light in a refringent medium. Imagine a recipient full of water, and a ray of light; before it enters to the recipient has a velocity equal to (c ) and its corresponding kinetic energy; when it enters to the recipient gets a velocity: cr < c, and its corresponding kinetic energy A modernist physicist can not explain this because for him the reduction of velocity produces a lost of energy, and the new increment of velocity when the ray gets out of the refringent medium will not produce an increment of energy. The problem will be understand better with the numerical examples.Galileo and Newton established the laws of the dynamic of the macroscopic bodies and particles by the observation of them; but they never thought in the origin and roots of the movements. For Einstein the concept of energy was more fundamental than that of movement. For us the differences of movement of the bodies and particles can produce the energy. For him the matter could be transformed in energy: E = mc
2. Here the term E has no meaning without movement of m…In the XIX century Tyndall supposed that the sky gets its blue color because in the atmosphere are some dust particles that can disperse some of the rays that move over the atmosphere. He did not explain why the sky gets red when the Sun is near the horizon. Here will be given other explanation, considering why it gets blue when the Sun is up from the horizon, and gets red when it is near the horizon; and why it does not get the other color of the rain bow. Here will work with variation of kinetic energy.
An atom with r = 1.13763 x 10
—10 m, of its seven orbit electrons, has a kinetic energy of each one: K7 = 0.5 me v72 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,57 02 = 4.33586 x 10—20 joule In our model de fore value is expressed in corpuscles moving at light velocity (quantums). K7 / h = 4.33586 x 10—20 / 6.6256 x 10—34 = 6.545 x 1013 h / Sec.When all the corpuscles of a radiation pass near an atom or a molecule of a refringent medium they are affected by the fore quantity in some of the atoms or molecules of the refringent medium, as will be explained in the numerical examples.. For determine the refraction of light it is required to have the refraction index; this has been obtained by experiments; in the book: Physics, Principles and Problems, by James T. Murphy, and Robert C. Shoots are given some values of it: water. 1.33; alcohol, 1.36; quartz, 146; polyethylene, 1.52; glass flint, 1.61; glass crown, 1.62; diamond, 2.42. In accordance with modern physics this index is produced by a force; but in the dynamic of the corpuscles and microcorpuscles the concept of force or of energy results an ambiguous one; and now we have to repeat the idea that gives the fundamental of the Universe, the fore elementary particles, without any force or energy can be stable or moving at light velocity. with the same energy. In the atoms, the molecable electrons produce the exterior kinetic energy.
It was seen before that a molecable electron of an atom in its seven shell is affected by a kinetic energy equal to K
7; in the same way could be affected the radiations that pass near it. For to understand better it is necessary to obtain the value of K7; the seven shell molecable electron can move at v7 velocity during indefinite time because every time of vertex: tv7 = 8.27 x 10..17 Sec. is produced a deflection energy K^7 = 0.5 me v^72 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 x 691002 = 2.1747 x 10—21 joule / tv7 = 2.1747 x 10—21 / 8.27 x 10..17 = 2.6296 x 10—5 joule / Sec. K^7 = 2.1747 x 10—21 / 6.6256 x 10—34 = 3.2823 x 1012 h / tv7The fore could be interpreted as the atoms have the property or capacity to produce the fore energy every time of vertex (t>7), so, if a radiation as light passes near an tom or into its shells will be affected by such property or capacity. If the corpuscles of the ray of light are affected as was say, after that, they can continue moving into the refringent medium without been affected by the other atoms of such medium, during a time of multimolecule (t
m = 2.8 x 10—5 Sec,), as was say before. In the fore time the ray moves a big distance with its single refracted velocity, in the atmosphere. A refracted ray of light of the Sun, when moves up in the sky produces a blue color, and when the Sun is near the horizon, produces a red color. All these is because of the big quantity of rays we receive, a small quantity of them are affected by the atoms of the atmosphere. Of all the radiation received from the Sun we can perceive by our eyes those with: λ = 4 x 10—7 to 7 x 10—7 m ν4 = c / λ4 = 3 x 108 / 4 x 10—7 = 7.5 x 1014 h / Sec. (violet color) ν7 = c / λ7 = 3 x 108 / 7 x 10—7 = 4.2857 x 1014 h / Sec. (red color) The average ν is: ν = (ν4 ν7)0.5 = (7,5 x 1014 x 4.2857 x 1014)0.5 = 5.669 x 1014 h / Sec. In accordance with the table of radii of the atoms, the average one is: r = 1.0 μ. It was say before that the kinetic energy that has a molecable electron (7 shell) is produced by the velocity; v7 = 308,570 m / Sec., and that this velocity is maintained due that each time of vertex is produced a radialenergy equal to K
^7. It was explained before that a refracted ray of light, with some characteristics…will be seen forward, gets a decrement of its kinetic energy equal to K^7 when all its corpuscles are affected by the fore energy of the atoms of the refringent body. Here it is suppose that the atoms of a solid or a liquid, are in contact one with each other. In a gas, or in the atmosphere the atoms are spaced at relative big distances, beside they are not fixed in a place, but are moving, because this, when a corpuscle of the light radiation gets its corresponding energy of the K^7, this energy will work in an active atom in the gas, and will be proportional to K7, instead of K^7. In an average way the atmosphere is formed by molecules of N2; the radius of N is equal to: rN = 0.74 μ; considering there are 4 molecable electrons in a N2 molecule. The energy of K7 vary proportional to (rμ2) = (rμ / r)2; here: r = 1 μ.; all the values are expressed in equal magnitude. rμ = 0.74 μ. The kinetic energy of a molecule 0f N2 is equal to: K7´ = 4 K7 rμ2 = 4 x 6.545 x 1013 (0.74)2 = 1.4334 x 1014 h / Sec. = νNThe fore explanation could verify in the practice, but this can not satisfy us; so, here will be given a theoretical explanation, that at the same time that coincide with the practice will support our models of atom with polygonal orbits and my model of the multimolecules, and my theory of electric current; beside many other things. In the model of refraction of light in the atmosphere (and in any medium); will consider that for an atom of the medium, to affect to one corpuscle of the refracted radiation, the deflection point or vertex of the affected electron, ought to be in front and in contact with the corpuscle of the radiation. For to attain this, the electron must move around the atom during a time of jump: tj = 1.12 x 10—
11 Sec. . The most intense light radiation that fulfill the fore condition is the violet one: ν = 7.5 x 1014 corpuscles / Sec.; 7.5 x 1014 / c =7.5 x 1014 / 3 x 108 = 2.5 x 106 Corps. / radiation (= nm…?); tm = tj nm = 1.12 x 10—11 x 2.5 x 106 = 2.8 x 10—5 Sec. = time of multimolecule.The resulted radiation will be a refracted one time, is: ν
r = ν4 – vN = 7.5 x 1014 - 1.4336 x 1014 = 6.0664 x 1014 h / Sec. (blue color radiation); its refraction index is: ir = 7.5 / 6.0664 = 1.236.After move the ray in the atmosphere during a time equal to: t
m = 2,8 x 19—5 Sec, in a distance approximate equal to: d = cr tm = (3 x 108 / 1.236) 2.8 x 10—5 = 6756 m; is produced other refringent effect and the ray gets a frequency: ν c´ =6.0664 x 1014 – 1.4336 x 1014 = 4.5332 x 1014 (red color radiation).It is consider that in the instant is produced the refraction in the affected radiation, the light diminishes its velocity; but after that, it gets light velocity, but with bigger (λ) and less (ν).
I have the idea that with mechanophysics is possible to find all the characteristics of the atoms. Many of them have been obtained by experiments, as the radii of them. In the data required in this theme, has been see that due to the atoms of the refringent substance are produced the refraction index in the radiations that penetrate into the refringent substance, here will be explained this, although for to obtain an exact value, it is not easy, because intervene some data that can have many variations due to many facts., In the models will be given here have been consider that the molecable electrons are those that produce the energy of the refraction effects in the incident radiations; for to understand better this problem, will consider a typical atom.
Next will be given a model of refringent substance, of course it ought to be a transparent one. We consider that for a body to be a stable one, all its atoms ought to produce their deflection effect at the same time. This also happens in other fields, for instance in the transfusion of blood; in the transplant of organs; in all bodies including the transparent and opaque ones; other way would be rejection effects in such bodies. Based in this will be made our model of refringent substance. If light reduces its velocity when enter to a refringent body is because its atoms affect the velocity of the incident radiation. We suppose that the main influence for this are the molecable electrons; their kinetic energy can reduce the velocity of the incident radiation; this energy is proportional to the square of their radii. The radial kinetic energy of the typical molecable electron is: K
^7 = 2.1747 x 10—21 joule / tv7 = 2.6296 x 10—5 joule /Sec. = 3.2823 x 1012 h /tv7Of course the fore energy affect the incident radiation, nevertheless, till here has not defined the time it acts. The fore energy acts in order the orbital velocity remains by indefinite time, because in every vertex is produced this radial deflection in every time of vertex: t
v7 = 8.27 x 10—17 Sec. The fore energy acting N times, as will be seen afterward, can produce the energy that will refract the incident ray; all these in the case that the refringent body has the atoms (typical) with the values given before; but some atoms have radii bigger, or smaller than: rμ = 1 μ. Here have talked of substances formed by atoms, but there are other formed by molecules.Till here have been defined the energies that produce the molecable electrons that affect the incident radiations. These energies K
^7 are produced every time of vertex t>7, but has not been explained how acts in the corpuscles of the incident radiations. In other themes have been explained that the times of vertex are constant values for all the seven orbits of all the atoms, no matter they have different radii. In our model is consider that for each corpuscle of the incident radiation to be affected by E^7´ energy, it coincide with the orbital electron that produces it; beside other conditions…. Taking in account the atoms (typical) with: r = 1 μ, distributed in an isometric way, and the incident ray with velocity: c = 3 x 108 m / Sec (as if were not affected by the refringent body…). In this theoretical case, each corpuscle of the ray, for to advance from one atom to the adjacent one requires a time: tr = 2 r / c = 2 x 10—10 / 3 x 108 = 6.6667 x 10—19 Sec. For coincide a corpuscle of light with an orbital electron in its time of vertex, the corpuscle ought to advance the following quantity of atoms: n> = tv7 / tr = 8.27 x 10—17 / 6.6667 x 10—19 = 124 atoms.As the molecable electrons of the atoms of the refringent substance have different values: r ≠ 1 μ, the values of n
> can vary in a signify way. In a refringent substance formed by molecules the atoms that produce the refringent effect have other variations. Because all these, is not easy to determine the refringent index in this way; maybe there is a relation between the specific heat and the refraction index. In our model will be consider that if the refringent substance is formed by molecules; the atom of a molecule that is affected by the bigger quantity of molecable electrons, is that that contribute to the refraction of the incident radiation. The numerical examples will be given here fulfill the condition of an atom affected by 4 molecable electrons, except the diamond.First let see the water: H2O. The O has two mlecable electrons and is affected by two molecable electrons of the two H atoms. In an approximate way we suppose that its radius is: r ≈ (r
H + rO) / 2 = (0.37 + 0.74) / 2 = 0.555 m. All light radiations get equal velocity in the refringent medium, but as they have different frequency ν when the radiation enter to such medium, its frequency diminishes in the same proportion than its velocity; the corpuscular separation does not change.. The light radiations have different energies h / Sec.) The violet color: Wv = c / λv = 3 x 108 / 4 x 10—7 = 7.5 x 1014 h /Sec. The red color nr = c / λr = 3 x 108 / 7 x 10—7 = 4.2857 x 1014 h / Sec.Here will choose an average radiation ray:
W = (W
, and of the molecule formed by more than two atoms. For the water will consider an (O) atom with two H ones, fixed to it perpendicularly, forming an L: But this molecule is not a move less, but has a double rotation movement, around atom (O) For produce such rotation it is required a minimum space that is that can be confined in a cube, that we will call: confined volume; the size of the fore mentioned cube has a length of 3 diameter of an atom, as will be seen forward. In the water can be consider the cubes of the confined volume distribute in an isometric way, in contact one with each other, so there is attraction between them with an energy equal to the cohesion there is in the water molecules. Here we have to remember that particles with the same sign do not reject, if they are not free to be oriented for this; on the contrary, can be attraction between them.
When were study the molecules, it was take in account that the atoms that form them ought to have the same diameter; because this, in an approximate way can have: r = 0.5(r
O + rH) = 0.555 μ (see table of radii of atoms). It was say before that a water molecule is into the confined volume. This cube must have the density of water, given by the weight of the molecule of water, and also the required space for the double and perpendicular rotation was say before. The double rotation is produced simultaneously, and can be appreciated in detail considering rotation angles equal to: 360o / 28; nevertheless and in order to simplify the explanations, here will consider the rotation angles equal to 90o. In the annex figures is seen the confined volume corresponding to a rotating water molecule. Fig.(1) is a lateral view of the confined volume, indicating angular movements of 90o with the numbers: 1, 2,. . .6. The fore points in the sphere correspond to the center of the sides of the cube of the confined volume. Fig.(2) is a superior view of such movements. Fig.(3) indicates the water molecule in the position: 4 – o – 1; point (vertex) 4 is the atom Ha; in (o) is atom (O); in 1 is atom Hb. Next will take in account the movement of the molecule, first the movement of atom Hb, starting from point 1 to 2, rotation axis 3-5; next from point 2 to 3, rotation axis 1-6; from point 3 to 4; and from 4 to 1. Rotation of atom Ha: from 4 to 5, rotation axis 1-6; from 5 to 6; from 6 to 3; from 3 to 4.Next will take in account the rotation with 90
o angles, of the water molecule in form of L, considering the atom Ha the first term into the parenthesis; the atom O in the vertex (o); and the atom Hb the last term in the parenthesis. Starting rotation of the water molecule from: (4 – o – 1) (4 – o – 1); (5 – o – 2); (6 – o – 3); (3 – o – 4); (4 – o –1); and so on. . .The weight of the molecule of water is: w = 18 x 1.674 x 10
—27 = 3.0132 x 10—26 Kg. = 3.0132 x 10—29 m3 of water = confine volume = (6 r)3 = 216 r3 r = (3.0132 x 10—29 / 216)1/3 = 5.1863 x 10—11 m; φ = 1.0373 x 10—10 mThe energy that have the molecable electrons that affect the O atom are those that produce the refringent effect in the incident ray, vary in a proportion equal to: r
μ2 = (rμ / r)2 K^7´ = 4 rμ 2 K^7 = 4 (0.5186)2 3.2823 x 1012 = 3.531 x 1012 h / tv7 By experiment has been determine the refraction index of water: ir = 1.33, so, the diffracted velocity of light in water is: cr = c / ir = 3 x 108 /1.33 = 2.2556 x 108 m / Sec. The incident radiation with c = 3 x 108 m / Sec., gets the cr velocity since it enters to the periphery atoms of the water recipient; so the average velocity in such space is: cr´ = (c cr)0.5 = (3 x 108 x 2.2556 x 108)0.5 = 2.6013 x 108 m / Sec.Will be determine the distance (d) that advance the incident radiation in order to be affected by the vertex effects: d = c
r´ tv7 = 2.6013 x 108 x 8.27 x 10—17 = 2.1513 x 10—8 m The fore distance is equal to the following quantity of diameter of atoms: n> = d / 2 r = 2.1513 x 10—8 / 1.0373 x 10—10 = 207.4The lost of kinetic energy of the incident radiation is: W
L = W (1 – 1/ir) = 5.6695 x 1014 ( 1 – 1 / 1.33) = 1.4067 x 1014 h / Sec. Quantity of active atoms, acting in all the corpuscles of the radiation, required for produce the refringence of the incident ray: N = WL / K^7´ = 1.4067 x 1014 / 3.531 x 1012 = 39.84 atoms Distance travel by a radiation in order to gets refracted: D = n> N φ = 207.4 x 39.84 x 1.0373 x 10—10 = 8262.8 x 1.0373 x 10—10 = 8.571 x 10—7 mIt has been defined the quantity of time that an incident radiation pass by an atom in the instant it is producing a deflection effect. In a trajectory equal to (d). in water, the fore distance is equivalent to: n
> = 207.4 diameter of atoms. The time required for produce such refringence is: tr = N tv7 = 39.84 x 8.27 x 10—17 = 3.295 x 10—15 Sec. The radiation into the refringent medium (the water) moves at an average velocity: cr´ = 2.6013 x 108 m / Sec.; so the distance required by the radiation to gets regfracted is: D = cr´ tr = 2.6013 x 108 x 3.295 x 10—15 = 8.5713 x 10—7 m. Also is equal to: D = N d = 39.84 x 2.1513 x 10—8. Alcohol is a liquid refringent medium, could be tried in a similar way than water.In a refringent liquid substance as water was seen that the refringent molecules confined in their corresponding confine volume have capacity for produce a double rotation. In a solid refringent body, its molecules can not have the rotation movement; they are fixed in their confine volume, although do not occupy all its volume. As have say, all the atoms of a molecule get an equal diameter, in such way that an atom can be confines in a cube, whose sides are equal to the diameter of the atom; to this cubes we will call: atom cube. We can divide the confined volume by a whole number of atom cubes, and also all the refringent body, distributing them in an isometric way. Part of these cubes will be occupied by the molecules of the refringent body; so we have to define how are structured such molecules and how are they distributed in such body. The water molecules are formed as an L, in which the vertex of it is occupied by the atom (O), and the two branches are occupied by the two H atoms; this is logic because in an atom with two molecable electrons, they try to move in planes spaced at a maximum angle (90
o). For the quartz molecule will consider the Si atom in the vertex of the L and the two O atoms in the two branches of the L structure. It was defined the structure of the quartz molecule, next will be define how are distributed such molecules in the refringent body. We consider the two L in a vertical position, one is parallel to a lateral plane and the other parallel to a frontal plane of the refringent body; in such way that the Si atom of the first molecule is in contact with an(O) atom of the other molecule; in this condition it is required to take in account a double confine volume, containing the two molecules; this double confine volume will have the following dimensions, expressed in diameters of atom: 3 x 2 x 2 = 12 atom cubes.
All said before was for to explain the conditions in which works the quartz atom; but as there are many refringent substances it is better to give the condition of all the refringent substances in a general way; forward will be done this for 2 or 3 atoms molecules: 1) Although can give different position to the refringent molecules, always it is possible to work with a single confine volume; for instance in the quartz molecules was obtained a double confine volume of 12 atom cubes with 2 molecules; this is equivalent to a single confine volume of 6 atom cubes with one molecule with 3 atom cubes That all the atom cubes are distributed in an isometric way in the refringent body For simplify the explanations will give a position to all the terms; so the refringent body has a horizontal plane formed by confine volumes. Parallel to it and spaced one confine volume are other horizontal planes similar to the fore one and covering all the refringent body
In a vertical way there will be lines formed with confine volumes; in few words we have an isometric distribution of atom cubes (that form the confine volumes) in the 3 dimension of the refringent body.
Let see the quartz molecule
Considering two L structures of this molecule, adjacent one to each other, as was specified before, seen one in frontal position and the other perpendicular we have a double confine volume; with atom cubes equal to to: 3 x 2 x2 = 12, with two molecules formed by 3 atom cubes each one; this is equivalent to a confine volume of 6 atom cubes, with one molecule. The confine volume is: V
c = 6 (2 r)3; the weight of the quartz molecule is: w = (28 + 2 x 16) 1.674 x 10—27 = 1.0044 x 10—25 . The density of quartz is: Δ = 2.5 to 2.8; its average one is: Δ´ = 2.65. With the fore values can be made the following proportion: Vc : w :: 1 m3 : 2650 Kgs Vc = 6 (2 r)3 = 48 r3 = w / 2650 = 1.0044 x 10—25 / 2650 = 3.7902 x 10--29 r = (3.7902 x 10—29 / 48)1/3 = 9.2429 x 10--11The active energy that has the (Si) atom of the molecule of quartz is: K
^7´ = 4 rμ 2 K^7 = 4 (0.9243)2 x 3.2823 x 1012 = 1.1216 x 1013 h / tv7 The rafraction index of quartz is: ir = 1.46 The velocity of light into quartz is: cr = 3 x 108 / 1.46 = 2.0548 x 108 m / Sec. Average velocity of refringence: cr´ = (c cr)0.5 = (3 x 108 x 2.0548 x 108)0.5 = 2.4828 x 108 m / Sec. Dstance between active atoms of the molecules: d = cr´ tv7 = 2.4828 x 108 x 8,27 x 10—17 = 2.0533 x 10—8 m The fore distance expressed in diameter of atoms: n>7 = d / 2 r = 2.0533 x 10—8 / (2 x 9.2429 x 10—11 = 111.07Lost of kinetic energy of the incident radiation: W
L = W (1 – 1/ir) = 5.6695 x 1014 (1 – 1/1.46) = 1.7863 x 1014 h / Sec. Quantity of atoms, by radiation, with active vertex effect, required for produce the refringence in the incident ray: N = WL / K^7´ = 1.7863 x 1014 / 1.1216 x 1013 = 15.93 Trajectory required for the ray to get its refraction: D = n>7 N φ = 111.07 x 15.93 (2 x 9.2429 x 10—11) = 3.2708 x 10—7 = N d = 15.93 x 2.0533 x 10—8 = 3.2709 x 10--7Now let see the diamond
Here it is consider its structure with a molecule with its two atoms; one in a vertical position; and the other in a horizontal one, coinciding both with one of their atoms; Δ = 3510 Kgs./ m
3 So the double confine volume will be formed by the following quantity of atom cubes: 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 Confine volume: Vc = 4(2 r)3 = 32 r3 Weight of a diamond molecule: w = 2 x 12 x 1.674 x 10—27 = 4.0176 x 10—26 Kg. 4.0176 x 10—26 : Vc :: Δ : 1 m3; Vc = 32 r3 = 4.0176 x 10—26 / 3510 = 1.1446 x 10—29 m3;r = (1.1446 x 10
—29 / 32)1/3 = 7.0985 x 10--11 mQuantity of diameters of atoms there are between them:
n
Monterey, México, octuber 2006 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
“ “ March 20, 1999
EL MAGNETISMO YΑ LA TEMPERATURA
Este tema he decidido escribirlo en español, porque quiero honrar a los pueblos de América Latina, a España y Portugal que ahora les corresponde haber contribuido al progreso de la física en el siglo XXI; así como a los pueblos de Europa central les correspondió este progreso en el siglo XX. Podría decir que con este tema le estoy dando el tiro de gracia a la física moderna; pero este le fue dado en la década de los 70 del siglo pasado; cuando los astrónomos descubrieron que algunas galaxias se estaban expandiendo a velocidades hasta de 9 c; y ni con esto los físicos mas responsables del progreso de esta ciencia se convencieron. No encuentro razones para convencerlos de la realidad de las cosas. pero no se puede decir esto con algo que hace mucho tiempo ya murió en la realidad y que únicamente vive en la mente y deseos de las personas obsesivas...
Con este tema se van a aclarar muchas cosas; mucho progreso se ha logrado, aun siguiendo caminos equivocados y aquí se va a ver mas claro esto. En mis temas anteriores siempre había dicho que no entendía porque los corpúsculos como los de la luz, y los microcorpúsculos como los de la gravedad , sin la acción de una fuerza o energía, podían pasar de un estado inmóvil a uno de energía cinética. Con lo que diga en este tema, ya empiezo a comprender esto y a entrar en las raíces mas profundas de la naturaleza. Si he sido investigador científico, pienso que es porque puedo y quiero hacer el bien a la humanidad. Aquí voy a aprovechar para agradecer a personas que de alguna manera me han ayudado en esto; como mi padre que demostró que las teorías de la relatividad estaban equivocadas; como el Dr. Rodolfo Castillo Bahena, que fue director del departamento de física del ITESM, que a pesar de ser partidario de la física moderna, siempre me ayudó. asesorándome y facilitándome un pase para la biblioteca del instituto; al Sr. Gonzalo Estrada Cruz, director del periódico A.B.C., que sin ser lo que digamos un experto en física, confiando en mi, me facilitó ciertas ayudas que aparte de beneficiar a terceras personas me permitieron comprobar ciertos problemas...; y a otras personas que de alguna manera me han apoyado.
En un grabado del libro: Física, Principios y Problemas de Murphy-Smoot, me llamó la atención una fotografía de un recipiente de vidrio, cilíndrico en la que aparecía una pequeña esfera de plomo apoyada sobre un alambre conductor eléctrico, enrollado formando como una espira anular en forma de (o), con la que se podía producir un campo magnético dentro de su estructura anular. En la descripción de la fotografía se decía que al pasar una corriente de electrones por dicho alambre conductor, cuando la temperatura se aproximaba al cero absoluto, se lograba que la esfera quedara flotando en el aire; supuestamente si la corriente tenía cierta intensidad, y su campo magnético actuaba en sentido opuesto a la gravedad. Mas adelante se analizará este problema.
Siempre que se desarrolla una nueva ciencia o teoría; obviamente existen muchos puntos sin explicación inmediata; pero factibles de encontrar una solución, o sea que todas las ciencias y teorías se van ampliando a medida que se van ampliando las investigaciones, y no se justifica ignorar un trabajo de investigación por este motivo; al contrario, se le debe de dar todos los reconocimientos y oportunidades; esto se hizo con la física moderna, a pesar de que ya no se trataba de problemas sin explicación inmediata, sino de una negación de esta, al inventar y aceptar conceptos ambiguos y contradictorios. Si la física moderna se aceptó de inmediato, y a la mecanofísica no se ha querido aceptar, a pesar de todas las razones dichas, hay mucha discriminación en esto. Si en muchos años le he puesto todo mi cariño y buena voluntad a mi trabajo de investigación (y al de mi padre), y no se le ha dado ni un agradecimiento ni reconocimiento, la única causa que veo es que pertenezco a un país tercermundista. Muchas cosas se pueden arreglar muy fácilmente; por ejemplo en el tema: The Maximum Temperature Could Exsist, el problema se dio únicamente desde el punto de vista de los electrones orbitales; si estos electrones quedaban libres en (n) órbita debido a una gran compresión; también las partículas positivas de los sistemas binarios quedan libres, y si de acuerdo con la fórmula de Boltzmann, estos temían menos velocidad que la correspondiente a la de la presión dicha (y a la de los electrones librados); estas partículas positivas tratarán de tomar su debida energía cinética, aumentando su velocidad. Para un electrón liberado por presión de la séptima concha existirá una temperatura:
T
7 = 2 K7 / 3 k k = 0.5 me v72 = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,5702 = 4.3366 x 10—20 joule T7 = 2 x 4.3366 x 10—20 / 3 x 1.38 x 10—23 = 2095o K En el átomo H: m+ = 1.673 x 10—27 Kg.; v+7´ = 4 v7 / 1836 = 4 x 308,570 / 1836 = 672.2 m / Seg.. Para que m+ se mueva a una velocidad correspondiente a T7o, deberá tener una velocidad: v+7 K7 = 4.3366 x 10—20 = 0.5 m+ v+72 = 0.5 x 1.673 x 10—27 v+72; v+7 = (4.3366 x 10—20 / {0.5 x 1.673 x 10—27} )0.5 = (5.1842 x 107 )0.5 = 7200 m / Seg. v+7 / v+7´ = 7200 / 672,2 = 10.71 ≈ 11.Si consideramos que cada t
v7 segundos m7 aumenta su velocidad una cantidad v+7´, en 11 tv7 adquirirá su velocidad de equilibrio por temperatura = 8.27 x 10--17 x 11 = 9.1 x 10--16 Seg. Si m+7 = 2 x 1.673—27; Δ v+7´ = 2 v+7´ / (tv7 = 8.27 x 10--17) = 3 x 1.673—27; Δ v+7´ = 3 v+7´ / tv7En otros temas como: Maximum Temperature Could Exist, Pressure and Temperature; Mass of the Stars; no se ha considerado la energía requerida para reducir los volúmenes confinados; por considerarlos relativamente despreciables; por un lado, por otro, tampoco hemos definido si al reducir las cubiertas (shells) de los átomos, si también se forman otros elementos. En el tema: Polygonal, Virtual and Coulomb´s Orbits, se ha considerado algo que no existe, como son las órbitas virtuales, tratando de explicar y ligar un fenómeno con otro, etc. Aprovecho esto, para insistir en algo que no se me ha querido creer, y que costaría muy poco comprobarlo; y en lo que cualquier protegido de una universidad de mucho prestigio se hubiera hecho acreedor de un premio Nobel de medicina, o sea de la electroterapia; localmente las personas que me podrían ayudar en esto, emplean muchos recursos en cosas cuyo valor se limita a posibilidades dadas por los que pretenden tener mucho prestigio. Es muy lamentable que con esta actitud se les niegue la salud y la vida a muchos que la necesitan. En pocas palabras,, como una ciencia nueva, se está estructurando a la física mecanizada. Estamos concientes de que existen algunas lagunas por eliminar, pero al contrario de la física moderna, estas se han ido eliminando a medida que se avanza en las investigaciones.. Vuelvo a repetir lo que he dicho algunas veces: que es absurdo que una física tan ambigua y contradictoria como la física moderna, inmediatamente se haya aceptado y las ideas de mi padre y mías, a pesar de tener un buen número de años de existir no se hayan querido aceptar, ya no por nosotros, sino por el prestigio de los que se supone que controlan el progreso de la ciencia.
En el tema: The Plasma (Magnetism) (I) se consideró la acción de una corriente de electrones circulando por un conductor enrollado en forma anular, formando como una bovina en que los electrones circulan produciendo un campo magnético interior, de acuerdo con la regla de la mano izquierda, o sea en sentido contrario a la acción de la gravedad (¿). En el tema mencionado anteriormente, y en otros hemos considerado que la acción del magnetismo en la materia que está confinada dentro de la sección anular, actuaba en un sentido en los electrones de los sistemas binarios y en el opuesto en las partículas positivas
(la atraccvvón se nuifica or la reppulsión); por lo cual se producían esfuerzos de compresión y un aumento en la temperatura en dicha materia confinada.. Sin embargo al considerar el experimento de la esfera de plomo, nos dimos cuenta de que este efecto no es como lo habíamos considerado. De acuerdo con la esfera de plomo, y de la temperatura muy cercana al cero absoluto, la corriente de electrones en el conductor producen un campo magnético contrario a la fuerza de la gravedad. Este campo magnético tiene una propiedad de actuar en un sentido en la materia afectada y de producir un aumento en su temperatura; este aumento en la temperatura produce energía cinética en dicha materia que se opone a la magnética produciendo esfuerzos de compresión. Considerando que existe reciprocidad en estos efectos, al producirse el incremento de la temperatura, se producirían energías cinéticas en sentido contrario a las producidas por el campo magnético: lo que ocasiona fuerzas de compresión en la materia afectada. Pero al no producirse ningún incremento de temperatura (cerca del cero absoluto), no se producirá la energía cinética debida al calor, y la única energía que se opondrá al campo magnético, será la de la gravedad que se ejerce sobre la esfera de plomo.Para nuestro problema numérico consideramos al recipiente (tubo) de vidrio cilíndrico de un diámetro interior como de: φ = 1 cm ., A = π φ
2 / 4 = π 0.012 / 4 = 7.853 x 10—5 ≈ 8 x 10—5 m2El volumen de la esfera de plomo es: V
Pb = π φ3/ 6 = 3.1416 x 0.013 / 6 = 5.236 x 10—7 ≈ 5 x 10—7. Peso de la esfera: wPb = 5 x 10—7 x 11,300 = 5.917 x 10—3 kg. ≈ 5.9 gramos.Usando un conductor de cobre; la longitud de una multimolécula: L
m = nm 2 rPb = 2.5 x 106 x2 x 1.17 x 10—10 = 0.000587 m Longitud de un anillo: LL = π φ =3.1416 x 0.01 = 0.031416 m NL = LL / Lm = 0.031416 / 0.000587 = 53.7 multimoléculas / anilloConsideramos que cada 2.5 x 10
6 multimoléculas se ioniza un átomo en un tiempo: ti = nm tm = 2.5 x 106 x 2.8 x 10—5 = 70 segundos. Cantidad de electrones de la corriente I que hay en un anillo: nL = NL tm I = 53.7 x 2.8 x 10—5 I = 0.0015 ILa corriente I en el alambre conductor deberá de producir una carga q
+ en un tiempo: nm tm que actúe en cada masa atómica de la esfera de plomo , que hará que dicha esfera pueda flotar en el aire.Cantidad de cargas positivas activas en un anillo, cada segundo: q
+ = i nL / Lm2 = 1.6 x 10—19 x 0.0015 I / (2.5 x 106)2 = 3.845 x 10—35 I coulombs / 70 Seg. = 5.5 x 10--37 I coulomb / Seg.. Radio del anillo conductor: r = 0.005 m Fórmula de Coulomb: Fc = 9 x 109 q+ q1 / r2 = mA Fc = 9 x 109 x 5.5 x 10—37 I x 1.6 x 10—19 / 0.0052 = 3.167 x 10—41 I Newton.Con el impulso anterior producido en el alambre conductor son afectados (rechazados) cada una de las partículas positivas de la esfera de plomo a muy baja temperatura; sin que sean afectados los electrones, como habíamos supuesto antes de estudiar este problema.
I = 1.674 x 10
—27 / 3.167 x 10--41 = 5.3025 x 113 electrones / segundo = 5.3025 x 1013 / 6.25 x 1018 = 8.324x 10--5 amperesMonterrey, ,México, 22 de, octubre / 06 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
VELOCIDADES DE RECHAZO Y DE ADMISIÓN. (corrected theme)
Cuando Newton estableció las leyes de gravitación universal se inmortalizó. A fines del siglo XIX y principios del XX, al hacer observaciones mas precisas se descubrieron variaciones diferenciales entre la teoría y la práctica; por lo cual Einstein al establecer sus teorías de la relatividad supuso que esas pequeñas diferencias eran debidas, entre muchos de sus argumentos a las curvaturas que se producían en el espacio interestelar; de todas maneras se le siguió dando su valor muy aproximado a las teorías de Newton. Como en 1945 mi padre comprobó que las teorías de relatividad estaban equivocadas, y que las pequeñas diferencias mencionadas, simplemente eran producidas por efectos aberratoríos. Las teorías de mi padre fueron completamente ignoradas (hasta la fecha); porque los efectos aberratorios no nada mas se producen en los fenómenos de la naturaleza; sino también en la mentalidad de muchos de los físicos que se han considerado mas eminentes durante todas estas fechas..
Igualmente de las pequeñas diferencias mencionadas y del criterio con que estas se han justificado, en este tema pongo en evidencia que las teorías de Newton en este aspecto están incompletas, pues no toman en consideración ciertos efectos producidos por el movimiento de los cuerpos ínter actuantes. En este aspecto la actitud de Newton estuvo muy justificada; falta ver la actitud que tomarán ciertos investigadores contemporáneos antes y después de las investigaciones; si es que se dignan a hacerlas.
Hablando de cuerpos y partículas que se atraen (o repelen) cuando se encuentran en estado inmóvil, cuando están en movimiento, pueden manifestar ciertos efectos opuestos; con esto estamos indicando que una condición para que dos estructuraciones con iguales cargas se puedan atraer mientras la distancia entre ambas no tenga variación; así en el caso de dos corrientes de electrones iguales, moviéndose en dos alambres conductores paralelos y cercanos tratarán de atraerse el uno al otro. En la físicas aceptada esto se considera debido a la atracción de los campos magnéticos de ambos conductores. En la física moderna a las partículas atómicas (electrones, protones, neutrones) se les ha considerado como simples esferas uniformes, con propiedades físicas uniformes. En nuestra física, además les hemos considerado un lado por donde emiten y reciben fluidos, aparte de otras propiedades. Aunque los electrones se están moviendo en ambos conductores, sus respectivas distancias no varían; cosa contraria sucedería si las corrientes de electrones fueran en sentido opuesto en ambos conductores. En las partículas eléctricas la atracción entre dos de carga opuesta, es igual a la repulsión entre dos de igual carga; sin embargo no sucede lo mismo con la preferencia de inter acción entre cargas opuestas, que es mucho mayor que la inter acción entre cargas iguales (de rechazo); como se demuestra en los sistemas binarios que forman los átomos, y en que las partículas positivas del núcleo se orientan de preferencia a sus respectivas partículas negativas (electrones), en vez de hacia las positivas del núcleo de los otros sistemas binarios. Lo mismo sucede entre los electrones de un conductor con las partículas positivas del otro conductor, y viceversa.
Para no tener el problema de la resistencia del aire, los experimentos que veremos aquí, se podrían hacer en la superficie de la Luna. Si se dejara caer desde cierta altura un cuerpo en la Luna, se aceleraría por su gravedad. Si a esta altura se emite un proyectil hacia la Luna, con una velocidad mayor que la que le puede dar su gravedad; se tendrá la idea de que el proyectil llegará a la superficie de la Luna con una velocidad mayor con la que fue emitido. De acuerdo con los conocimientos que tenemos de la dinámica de los corpúsculos y microcorpúsculos va suceder lo contrario, o sea que como la velocidad del proyectil es mayor que la velocidad que produce la gravedad sobre el proyectil, la acción de esta se manifiesta en las partículas atómicas del proyectil en el lado opuesto de donde se recibió la gravedad; es decir que la velocidad del proyectil es una velocidad de rechazo, con respecto a la velocidad de acción o de admisión de la gravedad, de manera que esta actúa en sentido contrario al de atracción.
La explicación que damos de esto es que en el caso del cuerpo que se dejó caer, todas sus partículas atómicas adquirieron un ritmo de aceleración en armonía con la fuerza de la gravedad; la aceleración del cuerpo o partícula aumenta, sin que se pierda el ritmo que es producido por la velocidad de la gravedad, no por la velocidad del cuerpo., sino en armonía a este. En el caso del proyectil, este se emite hacia la superficie de la Luna a un ritmo mucho mayor que el producido por la gravedad sobre este; es decir, que en este caso la velocidad del proyectil es mayor que el ritmo de la producción de la gravedad (g
l) de la luna, o sea que es una velocidad de rechazo con respecto a la aceleración lunar.En la Luna la fuerza de la gravedad superficial es como del 16.5 % la de la Tierra, o sea: g
L = 0.165 x 9.81 = 1.62 m / Seg.. Si ponemos: L = 100 m de altura, donde se emite axialmente un proyectil con una velocidad de: vp = 20 m / Seg; supuestamente el proyectil arribaría a la superficie lunar en un tiempo: t1 y durante este tiempo la gravedad de la Luna incrementaría la velocidad del proyectil: vL = gL t1 / 2 = 0.5 x 1.62 t1 m / Se c; por lo cual tenemos: L = 100 m. = (vp + 0.5 gL t1) t1 = (20 + 0.81 t1) t1; t1 = 4.264 Segs.. Sin embargo, y de acuerdo con la teoría del doble flujo y/o la de la velocidad de rechazo: vp > vL; por lo cual la fuerza de la gravedad actuaría en sentido opuesto a como se supone (? ); es decir que tenemos: L = 100 m. = (vp – vL) t2 = (20 – 0.81 t2) t2; t2 = 6.966 Segs. = tiempo que tardaría el proyectil en llegar a la superficie de la Luna, y llegaría con una velocidad de: v2 = 20 – 0.81 x 6.966 = 14.36 m / Seg. (? )La física moderna está retrazada como un siglo. Cuando se concibió se aceptó con todas sus ambigüedades y contradicciones. Después se ignoraron ideas mas lógicas, como las de mi padre y las mías, por no haber sido concebidas por los que controlaban el progreso de la física. Más recientemente ya no fue posible ignorar las verdades, por lo cual trataron de piratearlas. Mas recientemente se ha querido (pero no se ha podido) considerar a la física moderna, como la solución de esta ciencia, con el mismo espíritu que un comerciante trata de vender sus productos obsoletos como si fueran los mas evolucionados. Las ideas que doy aquí (noviembre, 2006), aunque son sumamente trascendentales, también lo son muy sencillas, por lo cual va a haber muchos que traten de adjudicárselas; habrá quien diga que las concibió hace muchos años. . . lo raro de todo esto será que en todo este tiempo se haya quedado callado. Todo esto lo digo porque .si puedo hacer el bien lo hago sin pensar en que me lo agradezcan.
Muchas veces hemos hablado de lo infinitamente grande y de lo infinitamente pequeño. Con respecto al espacio y al tiempo no hay dificultad en entenderlo. Con respecto a lo material y sus propiedades, necesitamos pensar en ambas cosas para establecer sus límites. Un cuerpo interestelar no puede crecer indefinidamente atrayendo a otros, porque después de cierto límite, el aumento de masa y rechazo de compresión es mayor que el de atracción gravitatoria. Considerando lo infinitamente pequeño llegamos a la dimensión de los corpúsculos y microcorpúsculos. En los primeros su energía para producir cargas positivas y negativas es superior a la energía requerida para fraccionarlos: en los segundos su energía para producir la fuerza de la gravedad es superior a la energía para fraccionarlos: Con esto hemos fijado un límite al concepto de dimensión, y esta no puede ser un concepto absoluto, sino una parte de un concepto mas amplio, que viene siendo un espacio-energía; por lo cual las partículas mas pequeñas que pueden existir en el Universo son los corpúsculos y los microcorpúsculos
Monterrey, México, marzo del 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
SPECTRAL STRIP.
There are some similitude in the way born modern physics and mechanophysics; in some way have been based in the ideas of classical physics; so they have applied the laws of the movement of particles and bodies accepted by classical physics; but these laws are incomplete. In classical physics, that knew the existence of the electromagnetic and the gravity forces; but did not know how are produced, and how act such forces; because the dynamic of the particles and bodies developed by Galileo and Newton, only explained the action of such forces without have an idea how are produced. All have study modern physics know how it developed for to explain some problems in which the classical dynamic did not work; so, it is not necessary to talk of this.. In mechanic physics we understood that the classical laws of dynamic do not work when an atom can emits a radiation as that of light, at light velocity. We always have consider that light and gravity are of corpuscular nature, because the waves can not move in the empty space, and also their action is distributed in all their perimeter, and not in a point as does a corpuscle. Without corpuscles and microcorpuscles can not conceive an active universe, in which they move at light velocity
We can imagine a corpuscle into a move less electron; because such electron receives an exterior excitation, the corpuscle gets light velocity, escaping from the electron; here the impulse of the corpuscle is by far bigger than that of the excitation. We have two charged particles spaced several centimeters; one particle produces an induced field with a given frequency; the same frequency affect to the second particle with the same intensity, and vice versa, so there is an attraction between them, if they have opposite charges, a rejection if the charges are of the same sign.. A metal body is affected by a radiation with a given homogeneous frequency, and with the same frequency are liberated some electrons of the body. (n
f) (t/n) = f t; nf = homogeneous frequency; n > 1. Similar things can say of the microcorpuscles. With this is concluded that the corpuscles and microcorpuscles do not move by the impulse of forces, but of some excitation produced with determine frequency with too smaller energy. If the excitation moves at light velocity, can be determine the time of actionIn the seven orbit electrons can be consider that the internal propeller fluid of orbit acts at a time of deflexion: t>7 = 4.47 x 10
—20 Sec.. There are many details have been consider in he structure of the model of polygonal orbits; some of them have been explained in other themes. For to make the structure was choose the hydrogen atom, and with this was obtained the seven orbit in accordance with the black body radiations. In all atoms practically have been consider the same energy. Beside all the different diameters, the production and action of the different energies vary due to several effects, in time and in magnitude; because this, the values of t>7 and m^i obtained in the H atom can be much different in other atoms., In other themes have been say that when a given atom is ionized with a potential (in), the other orbital electrons of all the shells in some way contribute with some of their ejected fluid they produce (iS), to increment the energy of ionization to a value: ii = in + iS. We can interpret this in more than one way. The interpretation given in other themes, was considering that the electron of the ionization require more energy than in. Here will be given other interpretation we consider better; so the energy of the ionization has grown from in to iS; but its time of action diminishes from t>n to t>n in / ii. This last interpretation is in accordance with the observation made by the English physicist Moseley that discovered that the homogeneous strips report a frequency proportional to the square of the atomic mass of the ionized atoms; similar results were obtained in his investigation by Sommerfeld.
In other themes have been say that at a great pressure can reduce the diameter of the binary systems; nevertheless this is not the only way to have binary systems smaller than the seven shell ones. In most of the atoms, more of their binary system are smaller than those of the seven shell. Can be consider that this is due that the positive and the negative particles are affected by a propeller particle m^ that is synchronized to a higher frequency than that of the seven shell, by a reason we do not know well yet.
n the 1 row of the Mendelejeff´s table are all the atoms whose more interior shell is the 7 one. “ “ 2 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 6 “ “ 3 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 5 “ 4 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 4 “ 5 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 3 “ 6 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 2 “ 7 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 1
The most stable atoms are those of the first to the four rows. In the four row there are 16 elements, and their orbits have 16 sides, each one. In our model of atom with polygonal orbits, it is consider that the energy for to deflect the orbital electron in each seven orbit vertex is equal to the energy of the interior propeller fluid m^n, acting in a time of deflection: t>7 = 4.47 x 10—20 Sec. When an atom gets ionized, one of the seven orbit electron increments its kinetic energy from that of the seven orbit to the first orbit and afterward gets free from the atom. Here the propeller fluid m^7 increment its its value to: m^i is not interior, but an exterior one, manifested by a radiation; in the hydrogen atom this radiation is equal to: iH = 13.6 eV. = 13.6 x 1.6 x 10—19 joule. When is produced an ionization we have: 0.5 me v72 = 0.5 m^ic2 joule
When the H atom gets ionized the orbital electron is affected by: iH = 13.6 x 1.6 x 10—19 = 2.176 x 10—18 joule; iH = 13.6 eV. The radiation produced by the ionization is equal to: iH = 0.5 m^i c2 = 0.5 (3 x 108)2 m^i = 4.5 x 1016 m^i m^i = propeller fluid of ionization = mass equivalent to the spectral strip…. m^i = 2.176 x 10—18 / 4.5 x 1016 = 4.8356 x 10—35 Kg. When the ionization is produced the positive particle decrement its energy: D in = 0.5 me v12 - iH = 0.5 x 9.1091 x 10—31 (2.16 x 106)2 - 2.176 x 10—18 = 2.5578 x10—18 – 2.176 x 10—18 = 3.818 x 10—19 joule; v1 = 2.16 x106 m / Sec. = velocity of the electron in the first shell.
Monterrey, México, May 22, 2007; Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
f I were a protected investigator of a prestige university I would win a Nobel price of medicine by a work like this one.
Si fuera un protegido de una universidad de mucho prestigio ganaría el premio Nobel de medicina por un trabajo como este.
Para los que han aprendido con mucho esfuerzo la física moderna, esta es como una droga maligna que no les permite librarse fácilmente de ella.
Una persona me dijo que la física no es tan simple, como yo la presento. Pero no entiende que mi padre y yo partimos de lo difícil para llegar a lo sencillo después de muchos esfuerzos hechos en muchos años; y que los físicos modernistas entonces pensaban que lo difícil era fácil, y ahora piensan que lo fácil es difícil (mucha miopía; mis respetuosos desacuerdos para Bohr, Heisenberg, etc...).
THE DEFLECTION TIME
As investigator I feel a great respect for all them. With my work I have employed all the facts they have discovered, specially those of modern physics; many times I have say this physics is an ambiguous and contradictory science; nevertheless as been structured for to find new facts about physics. One of the creators of this science was Einstein, and with this he saved it to gets in a chaos; so he has received many recognitions; I am in accordance with this, but without considering him as important as Newton. Many times I have say that in 1945 my father had proved than that the theories of relativity were wrong; my father sent his investigation work to a congress of physics was made then, and it was ignored. As in 1965 I began my investigation work with my model of atom with polygonal orbits, that also had a limited and ignored divulgation. In these there is some ignorance and injustice that can be understand because the mentioned limitations. In some way all the progress of science ought to be consider as alternatives, that could be accepted as definitive after they get improved and get corrected of any fail; so has happened with the corpuscular and undulated theories of light. The problems we had with our investigation in the data mentioned, are eliminated beginning with the XXI century, because from it I began to send my works by internet to different universities in all the world. Now I am sure that my work has been recognized, bur not in the correct way, because some of it, was pirated by the winner of the Nobel prize of physics 2005.. La llama de lo grandioso no se apaga echándole basura, se intensifica.Nor Galileo, and Newton gave all the basis of physics. Einstein got a great prestige considering that light was a universal constant; its formula: E = mc
2 is a fail. With the existence of the corpuscles and microcorpuscles and the model of the atom with polygonal orbits, has been established the continuation of the physics gave by Galileo and Newton My father and me have not pretend to give a perfect science, but have give new fundaments to physics, so we can say that Galileo, Newton, my father Estanislao de Hoyos and me are the structurers of physical science.Practically I only have study the seven shell of the atoms, but with this have found some behavior of the corpuscles; nevertheless, in an indirect way have obtained several characteristic of the atoms; here will try to determine the behavior of the deflection of the orbital electron in a more direct way; of course the mentioned deflections make the orbital electrons to follow their trajectories around the nuclei of the atoms. But also can consider that such electrons can jump from one shell to other one; or from one atom to an adjacent one. The propeller particle m
^7 moves along the diameter of the electron from the in-side toward the out-side, and from this toward the in.side one. When the orbital electron changes from one shell to other one is produced an exterior propeller fluid with the particles m^7, that when get unbounded are transformed in radiations as those of light that can advance toward he exterior space during a return time; in half of the fore time such radiation start with a velocity (c) when emitted, and finish with a velocity = 0 m / Sec in the return distance point. the fore variation is produced with decrements of 6.25 % of (c) in a uniform way, in accordance with our theory. In the case of the movement of the m^7 particle into the diameter of the orbital electron, it enters in the in-side of the diameter at (c) velocity, advance at an effective velocity : v^7 m / Sec. along the diameter of the electron in a uniform way at the out-side of the diameter. From the out-side point the m⊥7 particle moves toward the in-side point moving at an effective velocity of 69,100 m / Sec.; and when it gets outside of the diameter of the electron gets a velocity equal to (c), toward the in-side point of the positive particle. In this way this trajectory is similar to that of advance of the return distance; also there are other similar characteristics that will be seen in the numerical examples. in which will be determine the deflection time of the orbital electron in a vertex. The advance, or the receding trajectories of the m^7 particle are equal to one diameter of the electron: d = 2 r = 2 x 1.4 x 10—15 m = 2.8 x 10—15 m. The axial effective velocity is: v^7 = 69,100 m / Sec. In the deflection time we have to consider two actions of the m^7 particle: first the particle activates its corpuscles for to get its movement; to this we call: pre movement effect. When this effect finish, the particle m⊥7 begins to move at v ^7; to this we call: movement effect In the fore paragraph were consider two times, in which is produced the deflection time; of them the movement effect is easy to determine because we know the velocity of m^7, and the distance: d = 2 x 1.4 x 10—15 m = diameter of the electron, in which moves the propeller particle. t>m = d / v^7 = 2.8 x 10—15 / 69,100 = 4.082 x 10—20 SecThe fore value: t
vm is equal to the time of deflection t> i f it can omit several properties that affect the action of the light velocity produced by m^7, affected by ve7 of the orbital electron and afected, in accordance with the first law of the double fluid theory by the radial velocity v^7. All these in accordance with the dynamic of the corpyscles and with the hyphotenuze: v> of the rectangle triangle with sides: ve7 and 2v^7; v> = ( ve72 + 2 v^72)0.5 = (308.572 +138.22) = (95,215 + 19,060)0.5 = 338.1; t> = t> m ve7 / v> = 4.082 x 10—20 x 388.1 / 308.57 = 447 x 10—20 Sec.The fore value of t
>m, fixs very well with the dimension of the electron; but in the fore paragraph was consider the pre movement effect, that logically is necessary for the corpuscles of the m⊥7 particle to gets active; and not only this; the timer of action of The movement of the radiation moving in the outer space, is the return distance movement (advancing + receding)tr ; And the movement of the m⊥7 over the diameter of the electron are similar in several aspects; can be made some proportions for to find the time of deflection, In accordance with the mass of the positive particle of the binary systems of the seven shell, can be three values; nevertheless the most common one is when the positive particle is formed by one proton plus one neutron ≈ 2 x 1.673 x 110—27 Kg.; and here only will work with this value, in order to simplify our theory. In accordance with the observations, we have 3 values for L = 4 x 1010, 5 x x1010, 6x 1010 light years; corresponding to the 3 T>. . .We have: L = 5 x 1010 light years = 5 x 1010 x 31,557,600 x 1.5 x 108 = 2.3668 x 1026 m. = average return distance;31,557,600 Secs. = 1 year.. v = c / 2 = 1.5 x 10
8 m / Sec. = average velocity of the radiation, Half return time: tr = L / v = 2.3668 x 1026 / 1.5 x 108 = 1.57788 x 1018 Secs. d = 2 x 1.4 x 10—15 = 2.8 x 10—15 m = diameter of an electron.With a proportion between return distance L and the diameter of the orbital electron d, we have: t
r (2 r) / L = 1.57788 x 1018 x 2.8 x 10--15/ 2.3668 x 1026 = 1.8667 x 10—23 Sec. Time of movement effect, considering that the orbital electron deflects at a velocity: v>7: = 69100 m / Sec : t>7´ (active time) = 1.8667 x 1023 x 1.5 x 108 / 69100 = 4.052 x 1020SecMonterrey, Mexico, December, 20, 2006. Manuel de Hoyos Robles
El siglo pasado perteneció a la física moderna; este siglo tiene que pertenecer a mecanofísica.
La física moderna es como un globo completamente inflado; si se le agrega mas aire va a reventar
en este año
Lo mejor sustituye a lo bueno; el automóvil al caballo, mecanofísica a la física moderna.
Es un error no reconocer la existencia de algo, esto no significa aceptarlo.
.
. THE INDUCED FREQUENCY IN SOLIDS
Before the XV century there was not a special interest to know how acted the different particles and bodies of our world; the Sun, the Moon, the stars, were consider a part of our world; instead to consider it as a part of them. In this condition some exceptional persons got ideas very much different than that of almost all people. Most of these ideas were obtained due to their great capacity of observation. From considering that all the Universe was limited in our world, and that this was an immense flat surface; to consider that our world have a spherical shape, and in the opposite side of it the inhabitants were in an opposite position ; that the Moon moved around the Earth, and the Earth moved around the Sun, were some great conclusions, as that of consider the effect of the gravity force. All is known of this force till the present time (except in mechanophysics) is its property of attraction. in modern physics it was consider that gravity force was produced by waves; same thing happened with the light radiations. Some of the men that initiated the first revolutionary change in science were: Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, and others. But these discoveries were made by their great capacity of observation, rather than by logical deductions.
In the beginning of the XX century, also was a great revolution on physics science, trying to explain some small differences between the accepted theories and the more precise observations. The idea to accept the observations is all right; what was wrong was the interpretation that was given to such observations, and that these interpretation have prevailed till the present time, with modern physics; and with such interpretation, this physics by itself has limited its capacity to get developed. This capacity has been limited to the classical dynamic, and to give more importance to something that always has been limited to acts in material spaces, as are the waves; but modern physics has consider they can acts in empty space; this in accordance with its contradictory and ambiguous criterion.
Of the two great revolutions that have had physics, the only correct one was the first mentioned; in a great part this was based in the movement of the celestial bodies . The revolution was given by modern physics was not based in the movements that have the electrons and the positive particles in the atoms; this in spite that in the XX century the study of the atoms got a great development; in other themes we have talked of many other wrong interpretations made by modern physics. Based in the objective ideas that had my father I developed my model of polygonal orbits of atoms. I can not say that got the ideas by direct observation of the atoms; these observations were made by the effects that the atoms produce in the macroscopic matter; and they were not made by me, but by the experimental investigators; the only thing I did in this was my interpretation and the relation between the different effects. Because all these I deduced that the atoms ought to have a certain structure; here could not extend giving more explanations, the only can say is that have arrived to some conclusions, for instance that of the induced frequency. In the theme: The Induced Frequency on Gas, was given the induced frequency of the N atom, without explaining what it is. In a very much fundamental way, yet I have not a clear idea; nevertheless, by now will explain it as follow: The induced frequency of an atom is the impulse that has when is moving at the velocity that has the sound in a body formed by such atoms; when the atom gets its induced frequency, each orbital electron also has the same induced frequency. In accordance with the fore explanation the induced frequency vary in the different elements, and because this can be explained why can not be atoms with more than certain amu.. I know some effects, but do not understand how are produced; the investigators that produced the first great revolution on physics are as I am now. I know how are produced some effects, but do not know why (?).
In the theme: Induced Frequency in a Gas, seem that the determination of such frequency is an easy problem, because in the gas their atoms or molecules are free, so there is not a direct interaction between them; also their amu is small. In a solid body, as the atoms are in direct contact one with each other, there is such interaction. In classical and in modern physics it has been consider that a solid body works in this way due that there are some electric attraction forces between the atoms. This explanation is very much problematic, because would imply that into such body there are many free charges. With my model of atom with polygonal orbits we can give a model in which it is not necessary to have free charges in a solid body; for to have a good adherence between all the molecules of such body. If it is consider that into a horizontal plane of the body are two adjacent atoms, one (N) placed in the north side of the other atom (S). We suppose that in the extreme north side of atom (N) there is a vertex in which acts an interior propeller fluid simultaneously with other propeller fluid acting in the extreme south vertex of the (S) atom. The action of both propeller fluid acting at the same time will try to compress both atoms, opposing the exterior tension produced in the body in the same direction. If the body is affected by an exterior compression force, this could be contra rested by the simultaneous action of two propeller fluids in the two atoms, also. Similar effects can be produced in all directions and planes, and with all the atoms of the body. None of these effects are produced in the gas atoms. We have say that the corpuscles and microcorpuscles do not get movement by mechanical forces, but by induced frequencies; but they can produce movements in the macroscopic particles and bodies in accordance with the classical dynamic. In the numerical example will be seen that some of the interactions could be between both dynamics, the classical and that of the corpuscles…
In other themes have give some effects produced by the corpuscles and microcorpuscles, in this theme will give others; but I consider they are not enough yet, in order to obtain some laws that will permit to investigate some ignored properties of the ultramicroscopic particles and their action on the atoms; it is supposed that other persons that will work in this way will obtain such laws. Here will study the problem given by the title of this theme. In the theme: Velocity of Sound was given a model of velocity of sound applied to an iron body. This problem was seen with a classical criterion. Here will be seen it in accordance with the induced frequency; that will work in the iron atom in a similar way as did in the gas; but there will be some differences, because in the gas the atoms are free to move and in the solids there is not this liberty. Next will be given some characteristics of the iron atom;
26Fe56; rFe = 1.17 μ. In our numerical example will use: r7 = 1.13763 x 10—10 m. With this last radius there is lees active induced frequency, but more latent one, than in the first mentioned radius; but the total induced frequency is equal in both cases. We will use the second radius, because with this can use: v7 = 308,570 m / Sec, that ids in accordance with our original model of atom… The iron atoms have 4 active shells; in each shell are acting several binary systems, whose impulse of their orbital electrons is given in the following table, of the: 7, 6, 5, 4 shells, due to their orbital velocity: me v7 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,570 = 2.8108 x 10—25 newton. m e v6 = “ x 360,000 = 3.2793 x 10—25 “ me v5 = “ x 432,000 = 3.9351 x 10—25 “ me v4 = “ x 540,000 = 4.9189 x 10—25 “ ??????????????¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿??????????????¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ Beside the translation velocity of the orbital electrons, there is an impulse due to their axial deflection in each vertex, produced by the axial velocity: v^7 = 69,100 m / Sec, in the seven orbit. The radial velocity in the : 6, 5, 4 orbits, can be determine as follow: v^n = 2 vn Sin.(90º/2n) v^6 = 2 v6 Sin.(90º /12) = 2 x 360,000 Sin, 7º.5 = 93,979 m / Sec v^5 = 135,159 m / Sec.; v^4 = 233,755 m / Sec.The radial impulses are: me v^7 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 69,100 = 6.2944 x 10—26 newton.
me v^6 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 93,979 = 8.5606 x 10—26 newton.
me v^5 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 135,159 = 1.2312 x 10—25 newton.
me v^4 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 233,755 = 2.1293 x 10—25 newton.
We have say that when an atom has an induced frequency all its parts ought to have the same induced frequency. Since was seen the theme: The Induced Frequency in a Gas, was seen that the normal induced frequency of an atom is given by its mass multiplied by the velocity of sound in the body that is formed by such atoms. The induced frequency in an atom is produced every time (ts), in which sound had advanced a distance equal to the diameter of an atom. In this time an orbital electron has moved around several orbits. In the orbital electron the induced frequency is produced on each vertex of each orbit, that is 4 n times / orbit. The time of orbit that employs the orbital electron is smaller than (ts); this means that the induced frequency is produced in an orbital electron ñ = ts / ton faster than in the whole atom, so we have: ts = 2 r7 /vs. In the 7 orbit of iron, of our numerical example: ts = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 5,000 = 4.55 x 10—14 Sec.
to7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 π / 308,570 = 2.3165 x 10—15 Sec.
The time of orbit of the electron in the: 7, 6, 5, 4 shells are: to6 = 1.7019 x 0—15 Sec; = (36 / 49) 2.3165 x 10—15 to5 = 1.1819 x 10—15 Sec; to4 = 7.564 x 10—16 Sec. 19.65 = quantity of orbts that makes an rrbital electron of the 7 shell in a time: ts = 4.55 x 10—14.Sec 60.178 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 4 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “
ñ7 = ts / to7 = 4.55 x 10—14 /2.3165—15 = 19.65 ñ5=25.746; ñ5 = 38.514; ñ4 = 60.178. = ( 49 / 16) 19.65 while the sound advances the diameter of an atom, the seven orbit electron have moved 19.65 orbits = 19.65 x 28 vertices...
The value of (ñ) gives the quantity of orbits made by an electron, while the sound advance a distance of 2 r7. In the vertices of each orbit is incremented the induced frequency of the electron. In the seven orbit there are 28 vertices, so it gets the following quantity of increments: (4 n) ñ 7 orbit: 28 ñ7 = 28 x 19.65 = 550.2; 6 orbit : 24 ñ6 = 24 x 25.746 = 617.9; 20 ñ5 = 20 x 38.514 = 770.3; 16 ñ 4 = 16 x 60.178 = 962.8 560..2 = quantity of vertices that moves a 7 shell electron in a time: ts = 4.55 x 10—14.Sec 962.8 “ “ “ “ “ “ “ 4 “ “ “ “ “ " “ “ “ “
In the 7 and 6 shells the binary system are formed by two amu; in the 5 and 4 shells some binary systems have the positive particle formed by 3 amu. In this way the weight of the atom grows in the same proportion than the positive particles, also the induced frequency. Also each binary system has the same proportional increment. With all these effects will be obtained the following equation, which will give the average induced frequency of a binary system formed by an electron and a positive particle. In the following equation will be consider the 56 amu, but acting in the 26 electrons. The first term correspond to the binary systems of the seven shell; the second to those of the 6 shell; the third to those of the 5 shell; and the four to those of the 4 shell:
?
4
x 550.2 (2.8108 x 10—25 + 6.2944 x 10—26) + 16 x 617.9 (3.2793 x 10—25 +8.5606 x 10—26) + 18 28 x 770.3 (3.9351 x 10—25 + 1.2312 x 10—25) + 184 x 962.8 (4.9189 x 10—25 + 2.1293 x 10—25) = 2200.8 x 3.4402 x 10—25 + 9886.4 x4.1354 x 10—25 + 13,865.42,157.8 x 5.1663 x 10—25 + 17,330.43,861.23,851.2 x 7.0482 x 10—25 = 7.57118 x 10—22 + 4.08838 x 10—21 + 7.16328 x 10—21 + 1.22148 x 10—20 = 2.4544 x 10—20 newton
In the seven shell moves 4/ 2 electrons; in the sixth shell mos 16 /2 electrons, inthe five shell mos 28/2 electrons, acting in in 14 x 20 vertices....
Dividing the fore impulses by 52 we have the total average induced frequency, expressed in newtons of a binary system of the iron atom: KFe = 2.4544 x 10—20 / 52 = 4.72 x 10—22 newton/ electron
The induced frequency of the iron atom is: KFe = mFe vs = 9.3688 x 10—26 x 5000 = 4.69 x 10—22 newton 5032 ≈ 5000 . . . Monterrey, México; June 10, 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
. FÍSICA DE ALTA ENERGIA (II) ( tema corregido)
El hidrógeno tiene una masa atómica: amu = 1.007825; su velocidad del sonido: vH = 1270 m / Seg. Si bombardeamos un átomo de C con un átomo de H a una velocidad de 1270 m / Seg. el C supuestamente se transforma en 7N13, que tiene una vida de 9.96 min. Numéricamente lo anterior es correcto; estructuralmente no, porque la frecuencia de inducción expresada en energía cinética es mucho mayor en el átomo de C que la del H. Lo anterior quiere decir que se formo un átomo híbrido de N, y sin ningún decaimiento; y no un isótopo con decaimiento b-. Si enseguida bombardeamos al 7N13 con otro átomo de H, a la misma velocidad dicha; el núcleo y el electrón del H se juntan con el núcleo del primer átomo de H, formando un sistema binario y produciendo otro átomo híbrido 7N14, que numéricamente es un átomo de nitrógeno, pero no estructuralmente « Si enseguida bombardeamos con un átomo H, de la misma manera al híbrido 7N14, obtenemos un átomo híbrido 8O15; que numéricamente es igual a un isótopo con decaimiento b+ en 124 Seg.; pero no estructuralmente. Finalmente bombardeamos al átomo 8O15 por otro átomo H, y obtenemos un átomo: 8O16 = 6C12 + 2He4 + g. En todo este proceso el átomo de C, al estar saturado por efectos de He, no sufre ninguna variación, así pues: g = 4 H – 2He4 = 4 x 1.007825 – 4.0026 = 0.0287 amu. =
0.0287 x 1.673 x 10
—27 = 4.8015 x 10—29 Kg.La energía liberada será: Kg = 0.5 x 4.8015 x 1
0--29 (3 x108)2 = 2.161 x 10—12 joule /1 HeAl estructurar la bomba de H se producen algunos isótoos híbridos radioactivos, que al no completar el proceso de estructuración se liberan, pudiendo producir efectos radioactivos en otros átomos en el medio en que se produce la reacción atómica. Sin embargo al aplicar mi modelo a los átomos de boro obtenemos:
5B11 + 1H1 = 6C12 + g = 11.00931 + 1.007825 = 12.017135 = 12.00 + g; g = 0.017135 amu. = 0.017135 x 1.673 x 10—27 = 2.8667 x 10—29 Kg.energía liberada: K = 0.5 x 2.866 x 10
—29 (3 x 108)2 = 1.2897 x 10—12 / joule / átomo de B. Energía completamente limpia de radioactividad.Basado en observaciones experimentales Bethe dedujo la estructuración de la bomba de hidrógeno. Aquí, basándonos en la frecuencia inducida, aunque apoyándonos en datos experimentales hemos obtenido esta estructuración. Este tema, por ahora está lleno de interrogantes, y no nada mas en el terreno científico: en el terreno diplomático nos podemos imaginar a un país muy pequeño y pobre, como El Salvador con capacidad de fabricar bombas de hidrógeno.
.Monterrey, México, 23 de agosto/ 07 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
Si aparte de los muchos trabajos, estoy presentando uno como este, es indignanante que no se me haya dado ningún reconocimiento oficial, en pleno siglo XXI.
FORMACION DE LA CIENCIA FÍSICA.
El desarrollo de la ciencia se ha originado por la necesidad de conocer los fenómenos que se producen en la naturaleza Estos siempre se han obtenido por las observaciones a las que se les ha dado diferentes interpretaciones; originalmente de una manera completamente empírica; pero a medida que se ha ido progresando, se han ido imponiendo los razonamientos lógicos. Esto sucedió con Galileo y Newton. Posteriormente a ellos, se ha tratado de seguir su mismo criterio; sin embargo las ideas lógicas no siempre han sido fácil obtenerlas, de manera que en algunas ocasiones se ha tenido que considerar la existencia de algún otro efecto para poderse explicar la existencia de algunas observaciones; esto sucedió por ejemplo cuando se impuso la teoría ondulatoria de la luz, con el éter.. Al final del siglo XIX y principio del XX, al haber pequeñas diferencias entre las observaciones y las teorías vigentes; entonces se impusieron las de la física moderna, concebidas principalmente por Einstein. En dichas teorías también se presentó el problema de obtener una interpretación lógica de una manera directa.
Por las razones expuestas anteriormente se consideró a Einstein comparable a Newton. Sin embargo no fue mas que un físico de segunda categoría, que al igual de muchos de sus admiradores de aquel entonces y aun del presente, nunca comprendió que todos los fenómenos que existen en la naturaleza se causan en lo mas pequeño y se manifiestan por los efectos producidos en lo mas grande. Tampoco comprendió que un resultado ambiguo es igual que un anti- resultado ambiguo
En la evolución de la ciencia ha habido actitudes acertadas y desacertadas; no nada mas en el aspecto científico, sino en el impositivo, como el que le sucedió a Galileo al pretender negarle sus deas mas lógicas, por el egoísmo de los mas influyentes. Lo mismo que en pleno siglo XXI nos está sucediendo a las ideas de mi padre y mías. Pero la ciencia no puede progresa por el capricho torpe y egoísta de los influyentes. Los trabajos de investigación de mi padre y míos han sido muy generosos, pensando en el beneficio de todos; pero muy mal agradecidos por las personas influyentes que no les interesa el bien de los demás sino el suyo propio. La ciencia no va a dejar de progresar por el capricho debido al egoísmo de los influyentes; y el miedo de decir la verdad de los que no son influyentes.
Monterrey, México, enero del 2008 Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
VEÑOCIDAD DE RECHAZO PERPENDICULAR
La generalidad de las personas piensan que un buen investigador científico es alguien con una capacidad deductiva muy superior a la de los demás, y desde luego con mucho interés en aplicar dicha capacidad. La generalidad de las personas se dejan impresionar en mayor grado por las ideas mas complejas y difíciles o imposibles de entender que emplean dichos investigadores. Desde que yo era muy joven me formé una idea muy diferente de este problema, posiblemente por la influencia de mi padre, yo aprendí a juzgar a los investigadores científicos de la misma manera que la generalidad de la gente juzga a las persona ricas e influyentes, cuya valía no se puede juzgar por lo anterior; un ladrón e hipócrita, o un mediocre afortunado y bien relacionado, pueden lograr mucho prestigio; y por muchas razones una persona honorable y competente no lo logra.
Mi padre fue un ingeniero minero, que siempre vivió y se desenvolvió en su profesión; desde luego, como la generalidad de las personas, también se interesaba por otras actividades, pero de una manera simplemente informativa y de interés general. En la primera mitad del siglo XX, un físico de segunda categoría, como fue Einstein. adquirió un prestigio extraordinario, al plantear sus teorías con ideas imposibles de confirmar y otras que únicamente se podían apreciar de una manera ambigua. Esto para la gran mayoría de los científicos le dio un prestigio superior a Newton, y consecuentemente la generalidad de la gente lo aceptó como un genio extraordinario, pues en todos los medios de difusión así se catalogó, desde las publicaciones científicos exclusivas para especialistas, hasta publicaciones de libros que estaban al alcance de la preparación de cualquier profesionista o estudiante con conocimientos de física.
Mi padre al enterarse de las ideas de la relatividad, le parecieron muy absurdas, y como he dicho muchas veces, en 1945 pudo comprobar que estaban equivocadas, esto gracias a sus conocimientos que tenía de física y de matemáticas, requeridos en su profesión. Otros científicos notables, como Poincaré, Max Planck, FitzGeraid, Lenard, Michelson, etc. no estaban de acuerdo con dichas ideas, pero no pudieron demostrar que estaban equivocadas; pero esto no fue por falta de capacidad, sino por algo opuesto a esto. Aquí sucedió algo semejante que en una fábrica, en que al no lograr sus operarios hacer funcionar un aparato, se recurrió a los servicios de un técnico experto que estuvo inspeccionando meticulosamente dicho aparato sin lograr su objetivo; finalmente un simple operario resolvió el problema, pues se dio cuenta de que el aparato no estaba conectado a la corriente eléctrica. Algo semejante le ocurrió a una persona que se cansó de buscar sus lentes, sin darse cuenta de que los traía puestos.. Este problema se debe a que por lo general las personas mas preparadas, buscan la solución en sus ideas mas elevadas y subestiman a las mas sencillas, y no nada mas esto, muchas veces yo he dicho grandes verdades y nadie me cree, y a Einstein. Bohr, etc. les creen todas las mentiras que han dicho.
Por las razones que he dicho, mi padre se limitó a comprobar que las teorías de la relatividad estaban equivocadas. Y yo, debido al poco éxito que tuvo en esto, traté de encontrar en toda la física otras ideas que confirmaran las de mi padre; y entre los dos hemos dado las bases de una nueva física (mecanofísica) diferente a la moderna, pero la terquedad se ha impuesto sobre la razón, y el progreso de la física se ha estancado durante un siglo. y no solo esto, sino los que empiezan a darse cuenta de esta falla , tratan de aprovecharse de ella, como lo hizo Roy J: Glauber y sus cómplices Theodor W. Hensch y John H. Hall, en complicidad con el presidente del comité del premio Nobel de física: Sune Svanberg como sucedió al adjudicárseles el premio Nobel de física 2005. Considerando todo esto, dicha persona parece no estar satisfecha con el robo de mis ideas y del dinero que recibió del premio Nobel; pues a mediados del año pasado inventó el juego del premio Nobel, consistente en que los participantes (de preferencia estudiantes...) deberían de presentar de una manera cualitativa alguna idea original de la física; la idea que resulte mas factible seria la ganadora; mas bien dicha idea le serviría al roba ideas para atribuirse otra piratería, contando con el apoyo de alguien como el presidente del premio Nobel de física del 2005.
La idea generalizada es que un investigador científico no necesita hablar de sus cualidades, pues esto corresponde a los charlatanes; correcto, pero cuando los encargados de divulgar el progreso de la ciencia no sean anti-galileicos y no dejan que la ideas de los que las conciben sean pirateadas; no se puede ser modesto ante los corruptos, y A ellos me estoy dirigiendo; yo soy modesto ante la gente decente, no ante los hipócritas y piratas.. Por esto siempre estoy afirmando que mi padre y yo somos científicamente muy superiores a Einstein. Si esto que digo aquí. y muchas otras cosas, son ciertas y muchas instituciones que gozan de mucho prestigio no lo quieren aceptar: ¿Cómo se me puede juzgar a mi, como un inmodesto . . . ? El Sr. Gonzalo Estrada Cruz dice que no me debo vanagloriar de todo lo que yo valgo, Dios me lo ha dado a mi y no a otra persona, por alguna razón que no comprendemos y que lo debo defender como lo estoy haciendo, para bien de la humanidad..
Todo esto lo estoy divulgando por internet; pero al principio no me libré de que me siguieran perjudicando, porque me comenzaron a mandar bombas con virus con las que no me permitían ni mandar, ni recibir mensajes; por lo cual me vi obligado a cancelar mi correo electrónico de recepción; lo cual lo hizo las persona que me ha ayudado al buen funcionamiento de mi computadora; el también me dijo que ya no me iban a poder perjudicar en este sentido, porque las empresas de internet son serias y responsables y se encargan de mandar los mensajes respetando las ideas correctas de sus clientes honestos sin excepción, y que si se negaban darme su servicio, se lo tendrían que negar a todos. Es decir, que los problemas científicos que tengo con las personas e instituciones mencionadas, por ningún motivo les incumben a las empresas de internet. Si una tercera persona o institución se siente perjudicada, no podrá arreglar sus diferencias en complicidad con otras empresas. Si alguien piensa que lo estoy difamando, recuerde que existen leyes para castigar este delito; si ese alguien comprende que tengo razón en lo que digo, puede desistir en su actitud negativa para librarse de todas las críticas que estoy haciendo. Acabo de ver una película en forma documental del Papa Juan Pablo II, en que pedía disculpas a todos los que por algún motivo habían resultado perjudicados por su iglesia. incluyendo el problema de Galileo con la Santa Inquisición.
En el tema titulado: Velocidades de Rechazo y de Admisión, si no estoy muy equivocado, le estoy dando el tiro de gracia a la física moderna, para lo cual se requieren hacer experimentos muy especiales en la Luna. La parte científica de este tema en cierto sentido es una continuación del anteriormente mencionado tema, pero sin tener los problemas de aquel.
En una cámara cilíndrica al vacío, afectada por un campo magnético perpendicular, se pueden mover partículas con cargas eléctricas positivas o negativas, describiendo órbitas circulares. Las partículas con cargas tratan de moverse en línea recta; pero el campo magnético se manifiesta sobre la cámara con fuerzas axiales que afectarán a la partícula móvil, cargada, a reflexionarse hacia el centro de la cámara, en forma tal que la energía cinética de la partícula afectada por las fuerzas axiales o perpendiculares describirá una trayectoria circular alrededor del centro de la cámara.
Dicho campo magnético se puede formar por un alambre conductor enrollado perimetralmente a a la superficie exterior de la cámara cilíndrica; siendo afectado dicho alambre por una corriente, ver tema: The Plasma, Magnetism (I). La fuerza radial que produce el alambre enrollado, va a ser igual pero en sentido opuesto a la fuerza centrífuga, que produce la partícula cargada en su trayectoria. La aceleración centrífuga axial es: αr = v w = w2 r = v2 / r; w = v / r radianes. . De acuerdo con el campo magnético, simultáneamente se producen una determinada (v) (velocidad de la partícula cargada, y su radio de giro ( r) de su trayectoria circular. En 1930 Lawrence , diseñó su ciclotrón para acelerar un flujo de protones (o de deuterones), basándose en la formula anterior de aceleración axial, para poder acelerar hasta una velocidad: v = c a los protones.; lo consiguió por medio de campos eléctricos negativos, actuando en conjunto con el campo magnético; para esto dividió a la cámara de vacío en dos semicilindros, formando dos D. Con el campo magnético lograba que los protones describieran medio circulo en una D (semi-cámara). Al llegar los protones a la frontera de la otra D, en esta se producía un campo eléctrico negativo, que incrementaba el valor de ( v), y consecuentemente al valor de ( r). En esta otra D se produce una trayectoria de medio círculo, que es mayor que la anterior; al llegar los protones a la frontera de la primera D, en esta se produce un campo eléctrico negativo, que incrementa aún mas los valores de (v ) y (r ); y así sucesivamente.
En todo este proceso se ha considerado que el campo magnético es uniforme y de igual intensidad en la parte central de la cámara, que en cualquier punto de esta. De una manera breve podemos justificar esto. Si se toma un punto en el centro de la sección cilíndrica de radio (r) , la anterior distancia es igual para todo el alambre conductor. Si se toma un punto que esté a una distancia r 1 del alambre conductor (r1 < r), será afectado principalmente por las cargas que existen en un tramo (medido angularmente) α r1, Y por el lado opuesto será afectado por las cargas que existen en un tramo: α (2 r - r1). Esto por una parte; por la otra parte las cargas mas lejanas actuarán en un tiempo proporcional al valor anterior: α = r1 + α (2r - r1) = α 2 r. . .
De acuerdo con la fórmula de velocidad de rechazo perpendicular, actuando en sentido opuesto a la aceleración del protón; vamos a considerar dos protones que serán afectados por un campo magnético perpendicular a la cámara cilíndrica; el primer protón cerca del centro de la cámara (= r1); y el segundo cerca de la superficie exterior de la cámara, a una distancia del centro de esta, igual a (r2). De acuerdo con la intensidad del capo magnético, ambos protones tomarán una velocidad con una trayectoria circular, inversamente proporcional a sus radios de giro, y proporcional al cuadrado de sus velocidades y una misma aceleración radial (αr). Si aumentamos la intensidad del campo magnético, el protón mas externo estará mas propenso de escapar hacia el exterior del campo magnético; y el protón mas cerca del centro aumentará sus valores de (v1 ) y de (r1 ). Enseguida daremos un ejemplo numérico.
r = 89.5 cm = radio de la cámara cilíndrica.. Primero consideramos un alambre conductor de longitud de un anillo con diámetro igual a la cámara cilíndrica, con una corriente: I = 0.01 ampere = 6.3 x 1018 x 0.01 = 6.3 x 1016 electrones / Seg.
LL = 2 π r = 2 π x 89.5 = 562.3 cm. = 5.623 m = lenght of the ring cm. =5.623 m = circunferencia de 1 anillo Lm = nm 2 ra = 2.5 x 106 x 2 x 1.13763 x 10--10 = 5.68815 10--4 m = longitud de una multimolécula. nm = cantidad de átomos que tiene una multimolécula. LL / Lm = 5.623 / 5.68815 x 10—4 = 9,885 multimoléculas / anillo.
Cantidad de electrones de la corriente que hay en n anillo:
nL = I (LL / Lm) tm = 6.3 x 1016 x 9885 x 2.8 x 10—5 = 1.7437 x 1016 electrones de corriente / anillo Considerando que cada 2.5 x 106 multimoléculas se ioniza un átomo, en un tiempo: ti = nm tm = 2.5 x 106 x 2.8 x 10—5 = 70 segundos. En la corriente eléctrica podemos tener la cantidad de cargas positivas activas en un anillo. potencia de ionización: i = 7.7 eV = 7.7 x 1.6 x 10--19 = 1.232 x 10--18 joule q+ = i nL / nm2 = 1.232 x 10--18 x 1.7437 x 1016 / (2.5 x 106)2 = 3.4470 x 10--15 coulombs /70 Sec. = 2.4113 x 10--13 coulombs / Sec.
Con la fórmula de Coulomb determinamos la fuerza axial que producen las cargas positivas activas de la corriente en el anillo conductor:
Fc = K q+ q1 / r2 = 9 x 109 x 2.4113 x 10--13 x 1.6 x 10--19 / 0.8952 = 4.3377 x 10--22 newton = 4.422 x 10--23 Kg.La aceleración axial que produce la corriente en el anillo sobre cada protón que se encuentre en la cámara cilíndrica al vacío será: ar = Fc / m+ = 4.422 x10--23 / 1.673 x 10—27 = 26,4316 m / Seg2 ?????????????????¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿?????????¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿
Para un protón que esté a 10 cm. del centro de la cámara cilíndrica: α = 6.1336 = v12 / r 1 = v12 / 0.10; v1 = (6.1336 x 0.10)0.5 = 0.7832 m / Seg.. Para un protón que esté a 90 cm del centro de la cámara cilíndrica: v2 = (6.1336 x 0.9)0.5 = 2.35 m / Seg; 2.35 / 0.7832 = 3 = 90.5 Si se incrementa la corriente en el anillo conductor 9 veces, se producirá una aceleración axial
igual a 9 α = 9 x 6.1336 = 55.20 m / Seg2. El protón que se encontraba a 0.90 m del centro de la cámara tratará de salir de esta; y el protón que se encontraba a 0.10 m de dicho centro se desplazará a: r = 9 x 0.10 = 0.90 m de dicho centro; su velocidad aumentará a: v1´ = 9 x 0.7832 = 7.049 m / Seg.
Monterrey, México, 10 de enero del 2007; Manuel de Hoyos Robles
![]()
VELOCITY OF SOUND IN THE HELIUM ATOMS.
In the fore two themes was seen the induced frequency in a gas and in a solid; really here it will be seen in a liquid, because when helium is at very low temperature it gets in a liquid state. There is a direct relation between the velocity and the induced frequency, as was seem in the fore themes. In the theme: Velocity of Sound was seen the interesting experiment made by Lev Davidovish Landau on helium at very low temperature. As experimental one, he was a very good physicist, so he obtained very much interesting results. In a book or in a scientific magazine (I do not remember which one) I rear that he did not understand the fundamentals of the quantum physics, although he consider it was a correct one; in accordance with this, he tried to explain his experiments; but in this aspect I consider he only was a clever experimentalist; not a theoretical one this by one side, by other quantum is a deficient science.
I have the advantage of all the other investigators, that I can express saying the defects and name of all the physicists; this because they ignored the work of my father and mine for many years; and this is the worst insult can receive an investigator. The modernist physicists do not feel so sure of their knowledge. For instance, in one occasion Einstein said that beside him, only 10 Scientifics in the World understood his theories. In other occasion he said to Michelson why he employed so much time measuring the velocity of light. I suppose that if he were so sure of his theories, he would not needed to make such commentaries. About what I say of modern physics, a person that I appreciate so much, said me that in my investigation work would limit to it, without making personal commentaries. I am grateful for the indications made by such person, but I have to say that in more than 40 years have practiced such idea without any good result
In my fore two themes were mentioned the two great revolutions that had the physical science; but really are not 2, but 3, because now we are having a third one with mechanophysics. Really this third one born in 1945, when my father proved that the theories of relativity were wrong; but modern physics have had a whole acceptance that has prevailed till 2005, when the Nobel price was given to 3 persons, that appropriated one of my ideas, with which they won the physics Nobel prize. With all say is evident that the 1 and the 3 revolutions born with an antigalileo opposition. And the second revolution (of modern physics), that is a wrong one, has had an optimum acceptance that has prevailed till the present time. I do not want that my work could produce any conflictive effect; but if something can be imposed in an not logic and very much unjust way, the only can produce is what was say. Only the good things are imposed, because they are correct.
Next will study the velocity of sound in helium four
2He4. The numerical solution of this problem really will be made for to explain in a theoretical way the interesting experiment made by Landau, because from it we have used some values are not necessary to deduce in a theoretical way. First we will prove the lambda velocity of sound: vs = 116.7 m / Sec., produced at a temperature: T = 2.o2 oKThe weight of helium is: m
He = 4 x 1.673 x 10—27 = 6.692 x 10—27 Kg . The induced frequency of the atom is: FHe = mHe vs = 6.692 x 10—27 x 116.7 = 7.8096 x 10—25 newtonThe impulse of a 7 shell orbital electron is: Fe´ = me v7 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,570 = 2.8108 x 10—25 newton F^e = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 69,100 = 6.6.2944 10--26 newton Fe = Fe´ + F^e = 2.8108 x 10—25 + 6.6.2944 10--26 = 3.4737 x 10--25 Doble induced frequency of an orbital electron: = 2 x 3.4737 x 10--25 = / 6.9475 x 10--25 7.8096 x 10—25 - 6.9475 x 10--25 = 8.621 x 10--26
7.8096 x 10—25 / 6.9475 x 10--25 = 1.124
In our theme: The Maximun Temperature Could Excist was determine the temperature in accordance with the presion that hqve the atoms, given by the action of the orbital electron in an eacxis of its orbit with a force, produced by the velocity: v^n. Bigger forces as this, do not permit the existence of the atoms; so the concept of temperature los their properties, because can not apply to a universe in equlibrium; here only can consider movement of particles. Here will nt talk of this interesting problem, in which can give limits to all things, only in accordance with the propertikies can have all the particles f the universe.. In the fore mentioned theme was determine the temperature corresponding to: v^n, when ( n) vary between 1 to 7. The interior propeller particles m^n oves at (c) velocity. . . When an atom is introduced in a medium with very loud temperature, it does not desintegrate, its seven orbit electrons continue moving around their positive particles; in accrdance with our model at its same velocity; its kinetic energy, in some cases has growns, not because the mass of the rbital electron has grown, but because as ben produced someelectric attraction between it and its positive particle, that increment the effect of itsw mass; forward in the theme: Reactividad de los Atomos, it will be seen that some times there is not an extra atraction between both particles of the binary system, but also an rejxtra rejection, when the reactivity is negative.
becaause their active corpuscles also are affected by the kinetic energy 12.4 % in this problem; v^n¨ = 1.124 v^n
KHe = 3 T k / 2 = 3 x 2.2 x 1.38 x 10—23 / 2 = 4.554 x 10—23 joule. The velocity of sound: vs = (4.554 x 10—23 / 3.346 x 10—27)0.5 = 13,6100.5 = 116.7 m / Sec.
Time employed by sound to advance the diameter of an atom: s = 2 r7 /vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 116.7 = 1.95 x 10—12 Sec. Time employed by the orbital electron to move one orbit: to = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 π / 308,570 = 2.3167 x 10—15 Sec. / orbit
In a liquid substance the induced frequency is not produced in the vertices of the orbit of the electron because there is no resistance in each vertex for produce the deflection in a liquid substance; this effect only is produced in a time of orbit.
Quantity of orbits that makes the electron while the sound advance a distance equal to: 2r7: ñ = ts / to = 1.95 x 10—12 / 2.3167 x 10—15 = 841.8 orbits / ts The induced frequency of the atom is: FHe = mHe vs = 6.692 x 10—27 x 116.7 = 7.8096 x 10—25 newton
----------
Now will see the induced frequency of the atom when its v
s = 202 m / Sec.K
He = 0.5 mHe vs2 = 0.5 x 6.692 x 10—27 x 2022 = 1.3653 x 10—22 joule T = 2K /3 k = 2 x 1.3653 x 10—22 / 3 x 1.38 x 10—23 = 6.o6 K ts = 2 r7 / vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 202 = 1.1264 x 10—12 Sec. ñ = ts / to = 1.1264 x 10—12 / 2.3167 x 10—15 = 486.2Induced frequency of the atom: FHe = m
He vs = 6.692 x 10—27 x 202 = 1.3518 x 10—24 newton Impulse Half induced frequency of an electron: Fe´´/ 2 = me v7 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,570 = 2.8108 x 10—25 newton Fe^/ 2 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 69,100 = 6.2944 x 10--27 Fe = Fe´´ + Fe^ == 2.8737 x 10--25 x 2 = 5.7474 x 10--25 ne = FHe / Fe = 7.8096 x 10--25 / 5.7474 x 10--25 = 1.3589Making similar considerations asthat f the fore atom, we Have: Inrement of kinetic energy due to increment of active corpuscles 35.89 % in this problem; v^n¨ = 1.3589 v^n
-------------------
Now we will see the induced frequency of
2He3 in which is produced the sound zero: vs = 350.1 m / Sec.Mass of helium three: mHe = 3 x 1.673 x 10
—27 = 5.019 x 10—27 Kg. Induced frequency of atom: FHe = mHe vs = 5.019 x 10—27 x 350.1 = 1.75715 x 10—24 newton Impulse of an orbital electron: Fe´= me v7 = 9.1091 x 10—31 x 308,570 = 2.8108 x 10—25 newton Fe^ = 9,1091 x 10--31 x 69,100 = 6.2944 x 10--27 newton induced frequency: Fe = 2 ( 2.8108 x 10—25 + 6.2944 x 10--27) = 2 x 2.8737 x 10--25 =5.7475 x 10--25 ne = FHe / Fe = 1.75715 x 10—24 / 5.7475 x 10—25 = 3.7572 x Δ ne = vs / ñ = 350.1 / 280.6 = 1.25Quantity of orbits required by an orbital electron to gets its induced frequency: nf = ne /Δ ne = 6.25 / 1.25 = 5 orbits.
Monterrey, México, June 18, 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
En toda la historia de la ciencia yo soy el único investigador importante de la física que puede decir las verdades sin ningún adorno. Me puedo llamar importante porque si me comparo con Einstein, que estructuró una física que es un fiasco (la física moderna), se le ha considerado muy importante (sin quitarle méritos, que si los tiene); con mas razón se me puede considerar importante a mi que estoy estructurando una física verdaderamente lógica y científica. Nadie me puede llamar inmodesto, porque como científico tengo que decir la verdad; no se me puede decir que no soy diplomático, porque en más de 40 años yo contribuí al progreso y un egoísmo estúpido se impuso, negándolo. La física moderna, aparte de ser ambigua y contradictoria; resulta muy incompleta y deficiente, ya que nunca consideró darle importancia a las partículas que constituyen todo el Universo, formado por los átomos; como son los corpúsculos y los microccorpúsculos; como lo he estado demostrando evidentemente en mis últimos temas
Yo se ser humilde, porque con respeto acepto las ideas de otros, ya sean erróneas, conocidas, controvertidas, novedosas; y les se dar el lugar a cada una de ellas. A mi padre nadie le pagó, ni le reconoció su trabajo de investigación. Por lo que a mi respecta puedo decir lo mismo. A mi edad me agobia el cansancio, pero no puedo decir lo mismo de mi espíritu de investigación. Sé que mi trabajo de investigación para muchos no vale nada; pero valdrá mucho cuando algún influyente se pueda apropiar de el; pero esto ya va a ser muy difícil que suceda, porque este año o se reconoce mi trabajo, o declaro el espíritu antigalileico de la física moderna, aparte de sus muchas fallas que tiene.
THE BROWNIAN MOVEMENT. /modify theme)
I begging copping 3 paragraphs of a book of physics: In 1827 the English botanist Robert Brown observed by first time that the immersed particles, suspended in a liquid were moving in a continuous and swaying way. Nevertheless Brown did not understand why they moved so, and after several decades no one hypothesis explained such phenomenon. In 1877 Delsanlx explained that it was produced by the collide of such particles with the molecules of the liquid. In some way the fore explanation is incomplete because was not explained how the molecules were moving. Nevertheless this explanation has remained as good till the present time; but only in a qualitative way. I do not believe this could be done in a quantitative one; for some reasons will be given afterward.
In some articles I have red are given other properties of this movement. Some discoveries, although were not made for to study the Brownian movement, in some way can help to understand better it. Jacobus Van hoff, in 1886 published the result obtained of the diluted solutions showing the analogy there is between the behavior of such solutions and the perfect gases. Both are affected in a similar way by the equation: P V = R T; were: P = pressure; V = volume of the solution; R = a constant; T = temperature. During the next nine years he worked with the electrolytic solution enunciated by Arrhemius in 1877 He proved that the equation: P V = R T was not good when the electrolysis acted; so he altered the equation by a coefficient called: Van Hoff´s factor that is always bigger than one, and is determined in each case by the degree of dissolution; so the equation is transformed in: P V = i R T.
Jean Perrin, studying the movement of the molecules of a resin into water, calculated the Avogadro´s number. With mastic (a kind of resin) he analyzed the movement of such particles in the microscope. He could measure the quantity of molecules that were in a given mass of water; so he could obtain their kinetic energy; the result of this was amazing. The kinetic energy of the suspended particles corresponded exactly to the kinetic energy of the particles of a gas that were contained in the same volume and with equal quantity of particles. The particles used by Perrin in his experiment were as 1012 times heavier than the hydrogen molecules, but the kinetic energy of them were equal. With this result he obtained the Avogadro´s number with a value: 6.8 x 1023 molecules / mol; the present value is: 6.23 x 10 23 . This work was published in 1913.
With all say before we can conclude that with certain limits the suspended particles in a liquid behave in a similar way than the atoms and molecules in such medium (in the liquid). In this way can be explained the theory that consider the movement of the particles in the Brownian movement,
It could be “able” that in the water or liquid in which are the suspended particles that produce the brownian movement could be affected by an “equal” mass of the water or liquid that it is supposed that impact such particles. Boltzmann and all the investigator physicists till the present time, have consider that the molecules of the liquid and gases move at different velocities because they impact between them, one with each other, getting different kinetic energies I am not in accordance with this, as have explained in the theme: The Gas Distribution Energy. With respect to the impact of the molecules of the liquid with the suspended particles; such impacts could be produced in different and opposite direction at the same time, producing nullifying kinetic effects. I suppose that Boltzmnnn understood this, so did not pretended to employs his theory of impact of molecules, to the impact of these to the suspended particles In other themes I have say that Einstein did not distinguish between causes and effects; this by one side; by other side, when he could not find a logical explanation, used a subjective or an artificial one.
In accordance with I have say of Einstein, he developed his brownian theory considering the impact of the liquid molecules in the suspended particles; and similar thing have done the other investigator about this movement; so their theories have been accepted till the present time, with all the complications mentioned before. We consider can be explained that the molecules of the liquid and gases have their different kinetic movement produced by themselves (not by impacts between one with each other…) Similar thing I can say of the suspended particles, that produce their movement (Brownian…) by themselves; and with this simple explanation are devaluated all the accepted theories of browuian movement in the present time.
A person told me that I can not comp it with none influent person or institution, and that always, I will be ignored for them: my father and me are bother persons that conceived good ideas before them. For God they are only nuisances persons that only conceived a contradictory and ambiguous science, as is modern physics.. and my father and me are those that conceived the good ideas. In writing this lines, there are almost two and a half years that the influents tried to ignore for ever the work of my father and me, giving the Nobel price to three physicist that robed an idea of mine, disguised it as one of modern physics (remember: Harvard, Colorado and Munich universities…). They thought that in this way, and continue ignoring us, and giving the price in 2006, 2007… could steal one by one all our investigation work; this in spite that since October 5, 2005 I began to reply for this. Instead to get more prestige with this, are manifested as corrupts, discrediting the chemistry and the medicine Nobel prices; and many other negative tings. An honorable king, as is the Sweden one, gives personally such awards; in an involuntary way he gave them to 3 thieves; in 2006, 2007 he has continue giving such price in the same way; because this it is necessary he knows that, and that the consul of Sweden in Monterrey send a copy of this theme to the king; also I will send a copy to the president of México; hoping he understand this is not a politic, but a scientific problem, that affect to all México and to all the world…
Monterrey, México, 2 years, 5 months AG Manuel de Hoyos Robles
AG. = antigalileic year date. (initiated in an official way in Oct. 5, 2005, with the Nobel price of physics, in an arbitrary way…)
Si las personas que controlan el progreso de la física se sintieron muy valientes (aparte de corruptas...) apropiándose de las ideas que no les pertenecen: ¿Dónde está el valor para reclamar a los que les decimos: ladrones; corruptos... por esto? Enseguida voy a transcribir los comentarios que hice con este tema antes de modificarlo:
Si los grandes que han aceptado a la física moderna, son lo suficientemente humildes en aceptar que estaban equivocados, no por eso dejarán de ser grandes.
Rey de Suecia, por conducto: Cónsul de Suecia en Monterrey
a todas las universidades corruptas y de mucho prestigio, por internet.
![]()
MODELO DE IMAN (EFECTO DE INTERACCION).
En el tema Conduction of Heat se consideró que el calor se conducía a través de un cuerpo avanzando por capas de átomos, con trayectorias espirales; de acuer
do con esto supuse la posibilidad de obtener un modelo de imán; no quiero adelantarme dando una opinión sobre esto; pero aquí concibo un modelo con el que dentro del mismo átomo se producen las fuerzas de atracción magnéticas; me parece que este es mucho mas correcto. Como en muchos fenómenos, la interacción entre átomos de cuerpos sólidos es producida por los dos electrones de la séptima órbita a causa de muchas razones dadas y evidentes, aquí también hacemos la misma consideración. En nuestro modelo consideramos que los electrones se mueven alrededor de sus órbitas, y que estas , a la vez giran alrededor del núcleo. En las Fig.(1) representamos esquemáticamente la posición de las dos órbitas cuando estas están prácticamente paralelas, estas orbitas desde luego son poligonales (28 lados iguales), y de la misma dimensión; la indicada con línea continua y la indicada con línea punteada: En la Fig.(2) hacemos consideraciones semejantes, con excepción del sentido en que se mueven los electrones indicados por las flechas, que en este último caso son en sentido opuesto.
Al haber dos electrones orbitales en la séptima órbita, los dos tendrán que efectuar este movimiento de alguna de las varias maneras concebibles; por ejemplo podemos suponer que: Uno siga una trayectoria igual al del otro, pero separada varias órbitas, o sea en tiempos diferentes, en la misma trayectoria. Otra condición es que los electrones se muevan en sentido opuesto. En la gran mayoría de los átomos, en que el movimiento de los electrones es en el mismo sentido, este se manifiesta evidentemente cuando las órbitas son paralelas. En el caso de un imán, cuando ambos electrones prácticamente se mueven en un mismo plano, se presentan los dos casos indicados en las Fig.(¡) y Fig.(2), alternativamente, como se entenderá mejor con los ejemplos numéricos, especialmente con los átomos de Fe, en que las propiedades magnéticas se manifiestan en mayor magnitud. Supuestamente, para que un imán actúe con su máxima efectividad sobre un cuerpo con átomos de Fe, todos sus átomos deben tener a sus electrones moviéndose de igual manera al mismo tiempo, es decir sincronizadamente. Cuando un imán está aislado de otros cuerpos, sus átomos con sus electrones superficiales se orientan en sentido opuesto a los interiores, por lo cual existe una mutua atracción entre ambos, en forma tal que los flujos de inducción prácticamente se mueven entre la parte superficial y la interior del imán, sin escapar de este. En un cuerpo metálico supuestamente hay interacción superficial con interior, pero en función y condiciones de movimiento en el mismo sentido de los electrones orbitales; con lo cual se produce la resistencia y el módulo de elasticidad de dichos metales. . . .
Veamos el movimiento de un electrón de la séptima órbita del átomo de Fe, Consideremos en la Fig.(3), que el electrón se mueve en un tiempo cero, 0, en una órbita en el plano (A) dicho electrón avanza a o largo de su órbita; esta a la vez tiene un movimiento de giro, de manera que en un tiempo igual a Tj /3 (tiempo de brinco / 3) se moverá en el plano (B); en un tiempo 2 tj /3 se moverá en el plano (C); en un tiempo tj se moverá en el plano (A), y así sucesivamente. ⇔ El segundo electrón, cuyo plano se mueve en sentido opuesto, vamos a considerar que en un tiempo 0 se mueve en el plano
(A) como se indica en la Fig.(1); es decir, paralelo y en el mismo sentido que el primer electrón; por lo tanto se va a producir una interacción en los dos electrones; en un tiempo igual a tj / 3, su órbita girando en sentido opuesto a la del primer electrón se moverá prácticamente en el plano (B), en que los electrones se moverán en sentido inverso, como se indica en la Fig.(2), por lo cual no habrá ninguna interacción entre ambos electrones. En un tiempo 2tj /3, la órbita del segundo electrón, moviéndose en sentido opuesta a la del primer electrón en (B) se moverá al plano (C), en el que el movimiento de ambos electrones es como se indica en la Fig.(1), pero en e sentido de las manecillas del reloj que por ser en el mismo sentido producirán la doble interacción; y así sucesivamente. De acuerdo con lo dicho, en un tiempo tj se producen el siguiente número de interacciones en los dos electrones : n = 28 x 2 + 14 x 2 = 84 interacciones. De acuerdo con el anterior movimiento de los dos electrones y sus órbitas, podemos explicar la energía de atracción de los imanes de Fe.
La principal característica de un imán es su fuerza de atracción a otro determinado cuerpo de Fe; esta propiedad la producen sus átomos; pero para que estos actúen mas efectivamente deben de estar orientados en una misma dirección, porque de lo contrario el efecto de un átomo se puede nulificar con el efecto del otro orientado en dirección opuesta. Aquí vamos a ver un imán formado por átomos de Fe. Fuera de su propiedad de atracción el imán, sus átomos actúan de una manera normal como los átomos de otros elementos. En nuestro modelo de órbitas poligonales se determinó que la partícula productora de las deflexiones en las órbitas poligonales en la séptima órbita, tiene una masa igual a: m
^7 = 4.8324 x 10—38 Kg.. La masa de un átomo de Fe es: mFe = 56 x 1.673 x 10—27 = 9.3688 x 10—26 Kg.. Cuando vimos el tema: 21 Cm. Radiation of Interstellar Hydrogen; se consideró que dicha radiación era producida porque aparte de la masa del flujo productor de vértice m^7, también hay un exceso de masa en los electrones orbitales, que independientemente afecta a estos y al átomo de una manera cinética, y este efecto no nada mas es exclusivo del átomo de H interestelar. Al estudiar el magnetismo en los átomos de Fe, vimos que también se manifiesta en estos; dicha masa tiene un valor en la séptima órbita de: mL = 2.054 x 10—41 Kg. y le llamamos masa de radiación de liberación. El impulso que produce esta masa se efectúa independientemente de la m^7; o sea que mientras esta produce el fluido interno de deflexión, mL produce un efecto externo que se manifiesta como un impulso magnético. Este es producido en cada vértice, aunque no forzosamente es manifestado en estos, sino que se puede ir acumulando, y manifestarse en cada tiempo de brinco tj. fL = mL v^7 = 2.054 x 10—41 x 69100 = 1.4193 x 10—36 newton / tj = 1.4193 x 10--36 / 1.12 x 10--11 = 1.2672 x 10—25 newton / Seg.Cada vez que el electrón de una órbita coincide, en posición y dirección con el otro de otra órbita se produce un impulso fL. En la Fig.(2) están representadas dos órbitas, en condiciones semejantes ala Fig.(1) excepto que el movimiento de los electrones es en sentido opuesto. En el caso de la Fig.(1), aunque los electrones se mueven en sentido opuesto, por simetría coinciden en posición y dirección.. Ya vimos la interacción entre un electrón y el otro, para producir el efecto fL, de manera que en un tiempo tj se producen: Σ f
L = nL fL = 84 x 1.2672 x 10—25 = 1.0644 x 10—23 newton / átomo tj. La masa de un átomo de Fe es igual a mFe, y su impuso dado por la gravedad será: f Fe = mL g = 9.3688 x 10—26x 9.81 = 1.1908 x 10—25 newton. Carga que puede soportar el imán: wFe = Σ fL / f Fe = 1.0644 x 10—23 /1.1908 x 10—25 = 11.28 veces su propio peso.El valor anterior es muy fácil comprobarlo, conociendo el peso del imán y el del cuerpo de Fe atraído. La determinación de otros átomos con propiedades magnéticas se puede determinar conociendo la proporción de órbita en que coinciden ambos electrones.. Conociendo la coincidencia entre dos electrones de dos órbitas, en las condiciones dichas, nos van a dar una base para determinar un modelo de átomos radioactivos, pero este va a ser material para otro tema.
Monterrey, México, 8 de Oct. /07 Manuel de Hoyos Robles

THE BOHR´S MAGNETRON (la raíz de una física microcorpuscular)
when I began my investigation work on physics, I had many ideas very much different to the accepted by modern physics; most of them were obtained by my father. We did not accepted that light and gravity were of undulated nature, that require a material medium to propagate we did not accepted the field of forces, because the empty space can not produce forces; we consider that the corpuscles of light do not move as do the particles and bodies in the macroscopic dynamic, because from an atom are emitted the corpuscles of light, from zero to light velocity without an initial mechanic impulse; etc., etc. My father proved that the relativity theories were wrong.
Beside the fore mentioned ideas, I had those of classical physics; so I thought that for begin my investigation work I needed to conceive a model of atom; different to the accepted ones; although I was in accordance that the electrons moved around the nucleus of the atom, as the planets move around the Sun; but I got the idea that the orbits of the electrons were polygonal ones; requiring less energy than the circular ones; also in this way was easy to consider their radiations in accordance with the black bodies ones; was consider that the orbital electrons deflected in each vertex of their trajectory due to the action of interior fluids formed by corpuscles, as those of light, that from zero velocity got the light one, without the action of any mechanical energy. Other thing I had read and also imagined, was that the orbit of the electrons also move around the nucleus of the atom, covering all the surface of its shell.
I accepted the magneton of Bohr, as an energy that produce a gyration of the polygonal orbits; this model was in harmony with others. After many meditations was eliminated the nucleus of the atoms, that was substituted by the binary systems. My model of the polygonal orbits, first was made with a structural criterion; but trying to reach a scientific one, that we have reach now. After to conceive our model of atom with polygonal orbits of the electron moving around a single nucleus, I conceived the binary system model: Finally it was consider that each orbit of the electrons have a spin movement around the center of the atom.
Here will study my models considering by preference the seven orbit shells, that are those have more contact with the exterior medium and with the more evident characteristic of the atoms. The other shells have many similitude. An orbital electron moving in the seven shell with 28 regular sides, in a geometrical way, practically moves in a circular orbit. A binary system that is formed by a negative particle and the positive one; both have a charge q = ±1,6 x 10—19 eV. W The electron moves around the positive particle with a radius: r7 = 1.13763 x 10—10 m..
As we have advanced in our investigation, we need to find a model to explain in a scientific way the spin of the orbit of the electrons. Each binary system is formed by two unitary charges (+, -). We have decided that with the Coulomb´s formula can find the action of the perpendicular energy that makes the orbit to spin around the center of the atom. Here will work with the seven shell: q+ = - q- = 1.6 x 10—19 coulomb; r7 = 1.13763 x 10—10 m.; tv7 = 8.27 x 10—17 Sec. The Coulomb´s formula:
F
c = K (q- q+) / r72 = 9 x 109 (1.6 x 10—19)2 / (1.13763 x 10—10)2 = 1.78025 x 10—8 newton / Sec. = .78025 x 10—8 x 8.27 x 10--17 newton / tv7 = Coulomb´s force acting during a time of vertex. For produce the perpendicular energy, due to: v^7 = 69,100 m / Sec., the orbital electron receives from the Coulomb´s field an energy due to c = 3 x 108 m / Sec.. From this we have the proportional perpendicular energy that gets the orbital electron from the Coulomb´s field = (69,100 / 3 x 108). As the v^7 vary from 0 to 69,100 m / Sec. » 0.5 x 69,100 m / Sec. in a time of deflection: t<7 = 4.47 x 10—20 Sec.; then the proportion of perpendicular energy absorbed, is; (1.5 x 69,100 / 3 x 108) / tv7. In the theme: Time of Deflection, part of this time is an active one: t<7´ = 4.05 x 10—20 Sec.; and the rest (arrange time): t<7´´ = 0.42 x 10—20 Sec. t<7 = 4.47 x 10—20 = t<7´+ t<7´´;4.05 / 4.47 = 0.906; 1.5 X 0.906 = 1.358
The effective proportion of perpendicular energy employed for produce the magnetron is: (1.358 x 69,100 / 3 x 10
8) / ttv7. Half Magnetron of Bohr: m / 2 = 1.78025 x 10—8 (1.358 x 69,100 / 3 x 108) 8.27 x 10—17 = 4.611 x 10—28
Monterrey, México, May 31, 2007, Manuel de Hoyos Robles.
FRAME DRAGGING AND OPPOSING EXPANSION (I). (corrected theme)
Till the present time there are many physicists supporters of the relativity theories, and of subjective concepts; and many problems try to be solved with such theories. In the magazine: Astronomy, February / 06, there is an article that I transcribe here:
Lumpy gravity. An excellent gravity model from NASA´s GRACE satellite let scientists test relativity by tracking two Earth orbiting satellites.
General relativity. Einstein passes test
A distortion of space and time predicted by Albert Einstein´s 1916 theory of general relativity has been detected directly for the first time, say scientists. Writing in Nature (October 21, 2004), Ignazio Gunfolini (University of Lecce, Italy) and Enricos C. Pavlis (University of Maryland) report measuring a relativistic distortion known as “frame dragging.”
According to general relativity, the gravity of the spinning Earth drags the space- time frame work surrounding the planet forward as Earth rotates.
Says Pavlis, “The effect is like spinning a bowling ball in a molasses—any thing caught in the molasses moves along too.” He notes calculations indicate frame-dragging from Earth rotation could change a satellite’s position by about 6 feet (2 meters) over one year.
The team tracked the two Laser Geodynamics Satellites; LAGEOS 1 and 2, for almost 11 years, sustaining distortions such as that caused by Earth’s lumpy gravitation field. The effect the researched measured has 99±5 percent the amount predicted by general relativity.
They hope to have the results confirmed by NASA´s ongoing Gravity Probe B mission. “We are very satisfied with the present result,” says Pavlis.--ROBERT BURNHAM.
Since 1945 my father proved that the relativity theories were based in wrong fundamentals; this was done considering that the energy also could be aberrated in accordance with the first law of the double fluids theory, that consider that the aberration effects are manifested proportional to the incremented aberration acting at the second power. The first law of the double fluid theory can be applied to any body moving in a gravity field; but some times it is affected by other facts, that oppose such law. For to understand better this will be given some numerical examples. First it will be seen the case of a satellite that will remain fixed in a vertical position (rf), with respect to any point in the equator of the Earth.
Applying the Newton´s formula, we have:
F
f = G m M / rf2 = 6.673 x 10—11 x 1 x 5.975 x 1024 / rf2 = 3.9871 x 1014 / rf2 newton; m = 1 kg. If it is consider that the satellite rotates in the equator; the velocity of a point in the surface of the Earth here will be: vo = 2 π ro / 24 x 602 = 2 π 6.375 x 106 / 86400 = 463.6 m / Sec. Angular velocity of Earth and of satellite: w = 2 π / 86400 = 7.2722 x 10—5 Rad./ Sec. Radial acceleration: α = v w = w2r = v2 /r ; ro = 6.375 x 106 m = radius of Earth Ff = = 3.9871 x 1014 / rf2 rf2 = Ff / 3.9871 x 1014 = α = w2 rf = (7.2722 x 10—5)2 rf = 5.2885 x 10—9 rf rf = a / 5.2885 x 10—9 rf3 = Ff a / (3.9871 x 1014 x 5.2885 x 10—9 ) (3.9871 x 1014 )2 =Orbital radius of a satellite with equal angular velocity that a point in the equator…The gravity force in 1 Kg. in the fore point: rf = (3.9871 x 1014 / 5.2885 x 10—9)1/3 = (7.5392 x 1022)1/3 = 4.2245 x 107 m Ff = 3.9871 x 1014 x 1 / (4.2245 x 107)2 = 0.22343 newton
The centrifugal force: αf = w2 rf = (7.2722 x 10—5)2 4.2245 x 107 x 1 = 0.22341 m / Sec2 Velocity of the satellite: vf = Ff /w = 0.22342 / 7.2722 x 10—5 = 3072.25 m / Sec. vf = vo (rf / ro) = 463.6 x 4,2245 x 107 / 6.375 x 106 = 3072.14 m / Sec.
Next will be seen a satellite that is moving in an equatorial orbit between the mentioned before and the surface of the Earth. rh = 6.39 x 106 m The gravity force in a unitary mass (1 Kg.) is: Fh = 3.9871 x 1014 / (6.39 x 106)2 = 9.7646 newtons
The rotation velocity of the satellite moving along the equator: wh = (Fh / rh)0.5 = (9.7646 / 6.39 x 106)0.5 = (1.5281 x 10—6)0.5 = 1.23617 x 10—3 Rad./ Sec. Time of orbit: th = 2 π / wh = 2 π / 1.23617 x 10—3 = 5082.7 Sec. = 1.41 hours.. Velocity of the satellite: vh = wh rh = 1.23617 x 10—3 x 6.39 x 106 = 7898.7 m / Sec.. The velocity of a point in the surface of the equator is: vo = 2 π ro / 86,400 = 2 x 6.375 x 106 π / 86,400 =463.6 m / Sec. The velocity of a point at a distance above the equator equal to: rh - ro, is: vh-o = 463.6 ( 6.39 x 106 / 6.375 x 106) = 464.7 m / Sec.
If the satellite moves in the same direction than the rotation of the Earth, its velocity with respect to a point in the Earth will be: vh - vo = 7898.7 – 464.7 = 7434 m / Sec. If the rotation of the satellite is in the opposite direction than the Earth, its velocity with respect to a point of the Earth will be: vh + vo = 7898.7 + 464.7 = 8363 m / Sec.
The first law of the double fluid theory consider that if a body is moving in a gravity field it is affected in a proportion equal to the square of the increment velocity of gravity produced by the movement of the body. In the case of a satellite moving around the Earth, in the equator; if we apply the first law to the satellite , by one side it will try to increment its velocity, moving to a bigger orbit; by other side, we have that at bigger orbit is reduced the kinetic energy of the satellite: To this second effect we will call: opposing expansion. As the orbit of the satellite does not change its size, it is considered that the opposing expansion nullify the effect of the first law of the double fluid theory.
In the fore paragraph it was consider that the emitter gravity medium (the Earth) was in a fixed position; but if the Earth has a rotation movement, and the satellite is moving in an equatorial orbit, there will be a proportion rotation between the satellite and any point in the equator of the Earth; and in accordance with this proportion the effect of the emitted gravity of Earth will increment the velocity of the satellite, due to the efect of the second law of the double fluid theory; this because the velocity with which is emited the gravity to the saltellite, will be incremented (or decremented) in a vectorial waY , as will be appreciated forward Velocity of the rotation of Earth, appreciated from the satellite; ve = 464.7 m / Sec. ; velocity of the satellite: vh = 7898.7 m / Sec.
Considering the action of the first law of the
double fluid theory, when the equatorial satellite moves in the same
direction than the rotation of the Earth, it receives the gravity at a
velocity of
(c
ve) = (c
464.7) m / Sec.
Because this, the velocity of the satellite is incremented in a quantity
that isequal to: vs [c
ve)
/c]2
. - Dve. T o this increment of velocity of the
satellite,its orbit grows and at the same time the value of (ve)
reduces to: ve¨ = ve -
Dve.
In the second lapse of time, is repeated a simillar process: and
so on, till: SDve¨ = ve / 2; here: ve¨ =>
0. The values of Dve¨ are relative very much small,
and reduces every lapse of time so delay a long time (as one year) to
end to act. So, in accordance with our model the final
velocity of the satellite wol be: vh =
7898.7 + 464.7 x 1.5= 8,595.7 m / Sec. In the case of
the satellite moving in the opposite direction of the rotation of
the Earth, the satellite receives the
gravity force with a velocity (c "ve); and the final velocity f the satellite will :
7898.7 - 464.7 x 1.5
= 7,201.6 m / Sec
Monterrey, México, July 21 / 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles
REACTIVIDAD DE LOS ATOMOS
En la estructuración de la energía de un átomo, forzosamente tiene que existir una relación entre la energía de todo el átomo y los electrones orbitales; la diferencia entre la primera energía y la de los electrones nos van a dar la reactividad de cada átomo.
Esta diferencia existe porque a veceshay cierta atracxión, o cierta
repulsion extra en os electrones orbitales, como se explicó en el tema:
Velocity of Sound in the Helium Atoms. Estos datos han sido
obenidos basándonos lo mas posible en datos obtenidos por observaciones; cuando menos con esto nos damos cuenta de ciertas variaciones, que mas adelante podrán servir para entender mejor ciertas ideas. Todavía no tenemos una idea del porqué los átomos tienen determinado radio; por qué existe cierta relación entre la
velocidad del sonido y la estructuración de los átomos, etc. Todo esto se complica si consideramosque las masas atómicas de las partículas positivas varían entre un elemento y otro, o en el mismo
elemento, actuando en diferentes condiciones; por qué algunos elementos tienen varios isótopos. Pero
aquí vamos a simplificar lo mas posible nuestro modelo, eliminando todas las variaciones que podamos, y no dando ideas en las que no tengamos conocimientos mas o menos completos. Todas estas
explicaciones se complementarán con los ejemplos numéricos. Para simplificar nuestros modelos,
como dijimos, vamos a considerar a todos los átomos con los siguientes e iguales valores; excepto al
hacer el ajuste debido al cambio longitudinalmente del radio del átomo, que afectará linealmente a (ñ)y al impulso longitudinal de los electrones (considerando a vn, constante), es decir que se verá afectado por r2 al impulso de los electrones orbitales del átomo que consideremos, como se tomará en
los problemas numéricos.
1 amu = 1.673 x 10—27 Kg.; rn = n r7 / 7 = 1.13763 x 10---10 n / 7; v7 = 308,570 m / Seg;
vn =2,160,000 / n m / Seg.; v^n = 2 vn Sen (90º / 2n).
Z = número de electrones que tiene un átomo; A = masa atómica; vs = velocidad del sonido
en el átomo correspondiente (dato obtenido por experimentación)
Una masa atómica: ma = 1.673 x 10—27 Kg.
El impulso inherente que tiene cada amu de un átomo será: Fa = ma vs
Velocidades orbitales de los electrones: vn = v1 / n
vn = v1 / n = 2,160,000 / n m Seg.; v7 = 308,570 m / Seg v6 = 360,000 m / Seg.;
v5 = 432,000 m / Seg.; v4 = 540,000 m / Seg.; v3 = 720,000 m / Seg.; v2 = 1,080,000
m / Sec. Los anteriores valores se conservan debido a que en cada vértice de la órbita se produce:
v^n = velocidad de vértice; v^n = 2 vn Sen.(90º / 2n).
Velocidad de deflecciín: v^7 = 2 x 308,570 Sen.(90o / 14) = 69,100 m / Seg; v^6 = 360,000 Sen.(90o /12) = 93,980 m / Seg ; v^5 = 135,160 m / Seg.; v^4 = 210,700 m / Seg.;
v3 =
372,700 m / Seg.; v^2 = 826,600 m / Seg.
Impulsos longitudinales de los electrones: m
e vn.Impulsos de deflexión en los vértices:
me v
En nuestro modelo consideramos que tanto los impulsos longitudinales, como los axiales se producen simultáneamente. o sea cada tiempo de deflexión. La cantidad de deflexiones varía de acuerdo con el número de órbita, así en la séptima órbita hay 28 vértices, en la sexta 24, etc. La rapidez o tiempo (tn) conque el electrón es afectado por una deflexión es proporcional a: t
7 (n / 7)2. Aquí (t7) es igual al tiempo que tarda el electrón de la 7ª órbita.: tv7 = 8.27 x 10—17 Seg. = tiempo que tarda el electrón de moverse de un vértice al siguiente; aunque indicamos numéricamente el anterior tiempo, no es necesario emplearlo aquí; únicamente consideramos los valores proporcionales entre la n órbita y la séptima. Todo el problema en este modelo de impulsos de los electrones será obtenido con puras proporciones con que actúan estos; esto se irá aclarando mejor a medida que se vaya estructurando nuestro modelo. Enseguida vamos a indicar los impulsos que se producen en cada vértice de cada orbita; que será el impulso que tiene el correspondiente electrón.f7 = 2.8108 x 10--25 + 6.2944 x 10—26 = 3.4402 x 10—25 newton / segundo f6 = 3.2793 x 10--25 + 8.5606 x 10—26 = 4.1354 x 10—25 “ f5 = 3.9351 x 10--25 + 1.2312 x 10—25 = 5.1663 x 10—25 “ f4 = 4.9189 x 10--25 + 1.9193 x 10—25 = 6.8382 x 10—25 “ f3 = 6.5586 x 10--25 + 3.3950 x 10—25 = 9.9536 x 10—25 “ f2 = 9.8378 x 10--25 + 7.5296 x10—25 = 1.7367 x 10—24 “
La anterior tabla indica los impulsos que se producen en cada vértice de cada orbita, que son los requeridos para mantener el impulso del electrón orbital en dicha órbita
Estructuración del átomo de hidrógeno: 1H1. Su velocidad de sonido es: vs = 1270 m / Seg.; rH = 0.37 μ Su masa: mH = 1 x 1.673 x 10—27 Kg. Impulso del átomo: FH = mH vs = 1.673 x 10—27 x 1270 = 2.1247 x 10—24 newton. El sonido tarda en recorrer una distancia igual a un diámetro de átomo: ts = 2 r7 /vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 1270 = 1.7915 x 10—13 Seg. El tiempo que el electrón orbital emplea en recorrer una séptima órbita será: te7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 3.1416 x 1,13763 x 10—10 / 308,570 = 2.3164 x 10—15 Seg.
Mientras que el sonido avanza un diámetro de átomo, el electrón orbital de la séptima órbita avanza ñ número de órbitas: ñ = ts / te7 = 1.7915 x 10--13 /2.3164 10—15 = 77.34 Impuso del electrón orbital: Fn = ñ f7 = 77.34 x 3.44 x 10—25 = 2.6605 x10—23 newton De acuerdo con nuestro modelo original de átomo, el radio original de este es: r7 = 1.13763 x 10—10
m.; de acuerdo con la tabla dada, el radio unitario es = 1 μ.; Los átomos que vamos a considerar aquí (excepto el H) tienen: ra > 1 μ; de acuerdo con esto, el valor de (ñ) variará proporcionalmente en: ra / 1; igualmente (f7); y (Fn´) variará proporcionalmente a ra2... Fn´ = Fn rH2 = 2.6605 x 10—23 x 0372 = 3.6422 x 10—24 Reactividad (.-) : RA = FH – Fn´ = 2.1247 x 10—24 – 3.6422 x 10—24 = - 1.8163 x 10—24.
Veamos ahora la reactividad del litio
3Li 6; vs = 6000 m / Seg.: rLi = 1.23 μ mLi = 6 x 1.673 x 10—27 = 1.0038 x 10—26 Kg. FLi = mLi vs = 1.0038 x 10—26 x 6000 = 6.0228 x 10—23 newton. ts = 2 r7 / vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 6000 = 3.7921 x 10—14 Seg. te7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 3.1416 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 308,570 = 2.3164 x 10—15 Seg. ñ = ts / te7 = 3.7921 x 10—14 / 2.3164 x 10--15 = 16.67 Fn = ñ Σ fn = 16.67 (2 x 3.4402 + 1 x 4.1354 ) 10—25 = 1.8032 x 10—23F
n´ = Fn rLi2 = 1.8032 x 10—23 x 1.23 2 = 2.728--23 Reactividad (+ ): RA = FLi – Fe´ = 6.0228 x10—23 – 2.728 x 10—23 = + 3.2948 x 10--23 El valor de ñ nos indica el número de orbitas en que cada electrón se mueve produciendo su reactividad.
Atomo de berilio
4Be8; vs = 13,000 m / Seg.; rBe = 0.89 μm
Be = 8 x 1.673 x 10—27 Kg. = 1.3384 x 10—26 Kg.
Atomo de boro:
Atomo de oxígeno:
Atomo de sodio:
Atomo de aluminio:
ñ = t
s / te7 = 4.4613 x 10—14 / 2.3164 x 10.--15 = 19.26
Atomo de potasio
Atomo de calsio:
Atomo de hierro:;
26Fe56 vs = 4910 m / Seg.: rFe = 1.17 μ
m Fe = 56 x 1.673 x 10—27 Kg. = 9.3688 x 10—26 Kg.
FFe = mFe vs = 9.3688 x 10—26 x 4910 = 4.6 x 10—22 newton.
ts = 2 r7 / vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 4910 = 4.6339 x 10—14 Seg.
te7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 3.1416 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 308,570 = 2.3164 x 10—15 Seg.
ñ = ts / te7 = 4.6339 x 10—14 / 2.3164 x 10..-15 = 20.0
Fn = ñ Σ fn ≈ 20.0 (2 x 3.440 + 8 x 4,135 +15 x 5.166 + 3 x 6.838) 10—25 = 2.7592 x 10—22
Fn´ = Fn rFe2 = 2.7592 x 10—22 x 1.172
= 3.7773 x 10--22
Reactividad (+ ): RA(Fe) = FFe – Fn´ = 4.6 x 10—22 -3.7773 10—22 = + 8.227 x 10--23
Átomo de rubidio:
37Rb85; vs = 1300 m / Seg.: rRb = 2.16 μ
mRb = 85 x 1.673 x 10—27 Kg. = 1.422 x 10—25 Kg.
FRb = mRb vs = 1.4220 x 10—25 x 1300 = 1.8487 x 10—22 newton.
ts = 2 r7 / vs =2 x1.13763 x 10—10 / 1300 = 1.8097 x 10—13 Seg.
te7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 3.1416 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 308,570 = 2.3164 x 10—15 Seg.
ñ = ts / te7 = 1.8097 x 10—13 / 2.3164 x 10.--15 = 78.126
Fn = ñ Σ fn ≈ 78.126 (2 x 3.440 + 8 x 4.135 + 18 x 5.166 + 8 x 6.838 + 1 x 9.954) ) 10—25 (85 / 74)
= 1.7732 x 10—21 newton
Fn´ = Fn rRb2 = 1.7732 x 10—21 x 2.162 = 8.273 x 10 –21 Reactividad ( -): RA(Rb) = FRb – Fe´ = 1.8487 x 10—22 -8273 10—21 = - 8.088 x 10--21
Supuestamente los átomos de la columna del lado derecho de la tabla periódica, como el He, carecen de reactividad, por lo cual sus electrones orbitales, al moverse simétricamente, nulifican sus efectos de impulsos productores de reactividad... En los ejemplos numéricos anteriores los efectos de reactividad eran producidos a temperaturas de 273º K. Desde luego si se aumenta o reduce su temperatura, variarán esos efectos, y/o nos indicarán a que temperatura se igualan con signos opuesto dos átomos, para formar una molécula, o también que temperatura se produce al formarse la molécula. Basándonos en la anterior idea (que no hemos estudiado bien...), vamos a considerar la molécula Cl Na; y que esta se forme a 273º K. al juntar los elementos dichos. Aquí el volumen de sodio, considerado, tiene una reactividad negativa: RA(Na) = - 2.387 x 10—22 newton. Para que se forme la molécula mencionada, el Cl debe de tener una reactividad: RA(Cl) = + 2.387 x 10—22
Velocidad del sonido en el cloro: 17Cl35; vs = muy indefinido de acuerdo con datos tomados de internet; rCl = 0.89 μ mCl = 35 x 1.673 x 10--27 = 5.855 x 10—26 Kg. F
Cl = mCl vs = 5.855 x 10—26 vs newton ts = 2 r7 / vs = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / vs = 2.27526 x 10—10 / vs Seg. te7 = 2 π r7 / v7 = 2 x 3.1416 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / 308,570 = 2.3164 x 10—15 Seg. ñ = ts / te7 = 2 r7 /(vs te7) = 2 x 1.13763 x 10—10 / (2.3164 x 10—15 vs) = 98,224 / vs Fn = ñ Σfn = (98,224 / vs) (2 x 3.440 + 8 x 4.135 + 7.5 x 5.166) 10—25 = (98,224 / vs) (6.88 + 33.08 + 38.745) 10—25 / vs = 7.73072 x 10—19 / vs Fn´ =Fn rCl2 = ( 7.73072 x 10—19 / vs ) 0.892 = 6.12350 x 10—19 / vs Reactividad (+ ): RA(Cl) = FCl – Fn´ = 5.855 x10—26 vs - 6.12350 x 10—19 / vs 10--24 La reactividad del sodio es: RA (Na) = - 2.387 x 10—22; para formar la molécula de Cl Na, debe de ser igual y contraria a la reactividad del cloro:Monterrey, México, a 18 Sept./ 2007 Manuel de Hoyos Robles 2 años, 4 meses, antigalileicos
Es muy conocido el dicho: Nadie es profeta en su tierra. Pero otro dicho es mas correcto: Un tercermundista no es profeta en su tierra, ni en ninguna parte.. En mas de 43 años de investigación científica no me he hecho acreedor de ningún agradecimiento ni reconocimiento oficial; porque un tercermundista no se lo merece, pero si un primermundista, como quedó demostrado con el premio Nobel de física 2005 el que SuneSvanberg se lo otorgó a los ladrones: Roy J. Gauber de Harvard. John L. Hall de Colorado, y Theodor W.Hensch de Munich que me robaron una idea disfrazándola de física moderna; y no lo hicieron con todas, porque no es posible, pero pensaron hacerlo poco a poco de una en una, tratando de ignorarme, pero únicamente han confirmando su espíritu antigalileico. Este problema no nada mas es anticientífico, sino diplomático; un rey muy digo y honesto, de un pueblo igual (excepto SuneSvanberg) involuntariamente se está haciendo cómplice: nuestro presidente dijo que no escatimará esfuerzos en defender a los mexicanos y a México. Aprovecho la presente para agradecer su apoyo a don Gonzalo Estrada Cruz, a Rolando Leal Gonzàlez; al Dr. Rodolfo Castillo Bahena, al Arq. Héctor Benavides; al Lic. Francisco Santos de Hoyos: al gobernador Lic. Natividad Gonzalez Parás; al Dr. Humberto de la Garza Hinojosa; a Felix Ramos Gamiño, y otros muchos; en el departamento de física del ITESM quitaron todos los retratos de Einstein...
![]()
EINTEIN DE HASS EFFECTsINCE
Since wa accepted a structure of the atoms in the scientific workd, mst of the experiments and obervations of the behavior of them have consider they are stabñe àrtovñrd with out rotation movements by themseves or in the molecules. Because this, can be supposed that when a shall is filled with all its orbital electrons, these move in such way do not produce rotation movements in the position of an isolatedatom; ortorsion effect if the atom form part of a body. Same thig can say of the most intrior shel adits electrons. In the most exterior shell (7 one) wotj two rbital electrons, not always happens so; because the orbital electrons cold be affected by exterior atoms. In the case of an iron magnet, torsion effect is produced, as have been proved by the by the Einstein de Has experiment.
There are more than one than one way to appreciate the rotation r torsion of a magnetized body; the most direct one is hanging the body by a fine metalic wire, that will be affected b a torsion force. From this oint of view will be giben the model of of of iron magnet It is consider that ech atom of iron, by itsef acts as a magnet, because every half time of jump (tj/2) the two orbital electrons of the seven shell move simultaneusly in two adjacent and parallel orbits, in a time f orbit (to); this is done every tj /2. Here is valid to make a question: Why any body f iron, csn, or can not behave as a magnet? If the atoms of the piece of ron are oriented in differen direction, their magnetic effect are nullified one with each other. If the atims are oriented in the sae direction, their magnetic effecs sum p. When the two electrons move simultaneously in two adjacet orbits, the impulse of an orbital electron along a seven orvbit: f7 = v7 me = 308,5700 x 9.1091 x 10--31 = 2.8108 x 10--25 newton.
If we divide by half the seven shell in the same plane in which move adjacent the two electrons, will appreciate all the vertices of the orbit in a regular polygon of 28 sides (see Fig, 1); in the centter of it, with A is indicated the nuceus f the atom. With a straight line: O-A-14 is indicated the torsion axis; with O the north poe; with 14 te south pole. The line: 21-A-7, is projection, in a verical plane of the equator. As was say before, every tj / 2 is prodced a coincident of orbits of the two electrons. (every 135,632 / 2 = 67,816 vertices).
It is possible to make several model of atomes of iron that can act as magnet, in all them is consider that the orbital electrons of the seven shell, beside of their traslation impulses are affected, by oyther perprndicular ones, but these could at in ever vertex, or in every 28 vertex; or in every tj. As we ignore many facts; by now will consider the last condition. With ab exoeriment mde with a new iron mgnet, it supported a weight of 12 times its own one. So, in accordance with the model given here, the perpendicular impulse / tj (or the sum of them. . . ) is: F^ = 2 x 28 F7 = 2 x 28 x2.8108 x 10--25 = 1.5704 x 10--23 newton / tj; that we call normal trajectory impulse: Each one of these imuses, is oriente in the surface of the shell. In our numerical example will conside the value of F^, only producing a nrmal rotation in the axis of theatom, but not deforming the orit of the electrons. This impulse only produce a torsion effect in the iron atom.
In accordance with the possition f a vertex of the orbit of the eletron, part of the noral trajectory impulse F^, in its corresponding vertex will act perpendicular to the rotation or torsion axis (F^^), and (F^=), perpendicular to it. In accordance with what have say: in the vertices 0 and 14: (F^^) = 0.0 newton; and (F^=) = 1.57404 x 10--23 newton. ,(F^^) is a impulse perpendiculr to the torsion axis; and (F^=) is a parallel impulse to such axis. In the vertices 2 and 26 , (F^=) = 1.57404 x 10--23 Sin2 (90o x 5/7) = 1.2777 x 10--23 newton (F^^) = 1.57404 x 10--23 - 1.2777 x 10--3 = 2.934 x 10--34 newton (see Fig.1); a = 90o x /7.
From the fore result is deduced that thee normaltrajectory impulse F^, in an average way (in the 8 vertices . . . )can be divide in two equal ones; ne parallel to the rotation axis, (F^=); and other perpendicular to it, (F^^). If we consider fixed the rotation axis; around the nucleus A can translate an electron in 135,632 / 28 orbits/ tj; in all of them the quantity of (F^^) añway is equal to the quantity of (F^=). The iron atom in our model has two fundamental impulses,beside the translation ones: impulses parallel to its rotation axis; and impulses perpendicular to this axis; because this, in an average way the impse F^ is divided in two equal ones. . . . .
In an active orbit, we have: when the electron advances from vertex 0 to 7, (F^^) Grows when the electron advances from vertex 7 to 147, (F^^) G Diminishes when the electron advances from vertex 14 to 21, (F^^) Grows when the electron advances from vertex 21 to 0, (F^^) Diminishs
In accordance with the Einstein - de Hass experiment, in a magnet is produced a torsion effect. Considering that each iron atom works as a magnet in the iron body; ad this body works with more intensity while more percentage of its atoms are riente in the same direction. But an a magnet body beginsto lost some of its capacity of attraction with the time.
Next will make an extract of this problem, considering one iron atom as a a magnet. Longitudinal impulse impulse of the orbital electron F7 = v7 me = 308,570 x 9.1091 10--31 = 2.8108 x 10--25 newton. The perpendicular acial impulse (F^^) = 2.8108 x 10--25 = 7.87024 x 10 newton = parallel axial impulse (F^=F^ = normal rajectory impulse = 1.57404 x 10--23 ewton Fg = gravity impulse. Weight of an iron atom: mi = 56 x 1.673 x 10--27 = 9.3688 x 10--26 Kg. Aceleration of the atom by the gravity g = 9.81 m / Sec. Fg = mi g = 9.3688 x 10--26 x 9.81 = 9.1908 x 10--25 newton Fm = magnetic impulse of the iron atom.
With the experiment of Einstein - de Hass, has been proved that the magnetic attraction is proprtional to the torsion effect, so we have: An iron atom gets its magnetism by two effects; one by the action of the norma trajjectory impulse: F^ = 1.57404 x 10--23 = (F^^) + (F^=) = 2 (F^^) = 2 x 7 .87024 x 1'--24 1.57405 x 10--23 (F^^) = Fg n1 = 7.87024 x 10--24 = 9.1908 x 10--25 n1 The value (F^1=), can works as a second normal trajectory impulse. (F^=) F^2 = 7.870024 x 10-24 = F^2^) + F ^2 = 3.9351 x 10--24 +3.9351 x 10--24 In obtaining all the magnetic effect is exceding the value (^2=) = 3.9351 X 10 X 10--24. If it is consider that in a time tmj is produced all the torsion effect; with (F^2=) is preventing any grwer of magnetism after tmj = M tj . . . . F^2= 7.87024 x 10--24 + 3.93511 x 10--24 = 1.1805 x 10--23 = 9.1908 x 10--25 n2 n2 = 12.8 = relation between magnetism and and gravity...(?)... Radius of iron atom: r = 1.17 x 10--10 m The torsion impulse of an iron a6tom: F^2 = 1.1805 x 1.17 x 10--10 joul. A new magnetic body whose mass is equal to: Wm 0 0,1 Kg willhave a torsion impuls equal to: f = f / = 1.3812 x 10--23 x 0.1 / 9.3688 x 10--36 = 1.4743 x 10--9 joule / tj = 1.4743 x 10--9 M joulr / M tj . . . (?)
Monterrey, México, May 2008
Manuel de Hoyos Robles.