View My Guestbook
Sign My Guestbook
I have recently read a book of Q&A of many fields of science that I saw had a small flaw in something about the stars and night sky. The question is: “if the universe is infinite, why don’t we see a totally bright sky?” the answer in earlier times would have been dust blocks the light. That has been overruled in earlier times because eventually the dust would heat up and shine as bright as the star itself. So the flaw comes in the more recent theory. People say that the star light hasn’t reached us yet, because the stars are billions and trillions of light years away. This leaves people perplexed, because all matter came from the big bang, and we would just see an earlier version of the star. But, the reason this theory may be true is because the big bang merely put out mass and not developed stars and planets. So a cloud of matter comes, and once billions of light-years away, and the amount of light-years being higher than the years the universe has been around, will only reach us later, so we don’t have totally bright skies YET because the light will come later. You may think the star would burn out before the light got here, and it probably would, but the light would still be on its way, and therefore we would see stars light long after it burned out.
View My Guestbook
Sign My Guestbook