CHAPTER VI.
CLAIMS INVOLVING DEATH OF THE EMPLOYEE |
Note: Hyperlinks are currently being added to enable users to obtain both Board decisions and Appellate Court decisions by
clicking on the case name. This is a time-consuming process that may take several months to complete. In addition, not all
cases are currently available on the Internet for viewing, therefore there will be no hyperlink for those cases.
If you have any questions regarding this, please contact Jan Zimmers (Workers Compensation Board Research
Analyst/Webmaster) at 785-296-8484.
Go to Table of Contents, Keyword Index
§ 6.01 Generally
6.02 Nature of Dependency
- November 1997. (Award) Proof of dependency is not required of a surviving spouse on the deceased employee in
order to award death benefits to the surviving spouse. See Brinkmeyer v. City of Wichita, 223 Kan. 393, 573 P.2d
1044 (1978). Redditt v. McDonald's, Docket No. 211,963 [Remanded by Kansas Court of Appeals to review issue
of mutual abandonment, Docket No. 80,396 (1999)].
6.03 Partial Dependency
6.04 Special Aspects of Claims of Survivors
Abandonment and/or Desertion of Surviving Spouse
- March 2000. (Award) The Board found that there was mutual abandonment under K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 44-508(c)(2),
thereby denying death benefits to claimant. Over the course of time claimant not only accepted the reality of the
marriage relationship with decedent, but also demonstrated a preference for the separation existence, including
assumption of other relationships. The claimant and decedent had demonstrated a mutual preference for an end to
their marriage relationship. Redditt v. McDonald's Restaurant, Docket No. 211,963.
- November 1997. (Award) Claimant, the surviving legal spouse of the deceased employee, is asking for death
benefits. Respondent, however, argues claimant is precluded from benefits under K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 44-508(c)(2)
because claimant willfully or voluntarily deserted or abandoned the deceased employee for more than six months
prior to the date of the employee's death. The parties agreed that other than a phone call from the decedent to
claimant in 1986, the claimant and decedent had absolutely no direct contact with each other after 1978 or 1979 up
and until the decedent's death in 1995. Additionally, claimant received no financial support from the decedent from
1985 until his death in 1995. In determining whether an abandonment of the marital relationship occurred, the
Appeals Board looked to the logic of Tisdale v. Wilson & Co., 141 Kan. 885, 43 P.2d 1064 (1935), which stated the
question of whether an abandonment occurred is a question of law and defined abandonment as occurring when one
leaves the marital relationship with the intention of not returning. By focussing on the intentions of the parties, the
Appeals Board found that the decedent was the first to have the intent to abandon or leave the marital relationship as
evidenced by his leaving the marital home and having extramarital affairs. The fact that claimant did not seek a
reconciliation of the marriage was immaterial as decedent was found to be the first to abandon the marriage. See
Tatum v. Tatum, 736 P.2d 506 (Okla. 1982). Therefore, finding a valid marriage existed at the time of decedent's
death and finding the decedent was the first to abandon the marital relationship, the Appeals Board determined that
claimant was entitled to death benefits and the provisions of K.S.A. 44-508(c)(2) did not bar claimant's recovery.
Redditt v. McDonald's, Docket No. 211,963 [Remanded by Kansas Court of Appeals to review issue of mutual
abandonment, Docket No. 80,396 (1999)].
- But See Dissent, which would find that claimant and decedent reconciled the marriage in 1979 and then mutually
abandoned the marriage in that same year. The Dissenting Board Member finds the mutual abandonment of the
marriage would bar claimant from receiving death benefits under K.S.A. 44-508(c)(2). See eg City of Aurora v.
Claimant in Death of Corr., 689 P.2d 659 (Colo. Ct.App. 1984); Bass v. Mooresville Mill, 11 N.C. App. 631, 182
S.E.2d 246 (1971), cert den., 281 N.C. 755, 191 S.E.2d 353 (1972). Id.
6.05 Time Requirements